Mawby and Walklate looked at victimology as a social phenomenon. They broke victimology into three strains. Review these strains and discuss which strain you believe in the most and why.

The term that refers to someone who files an appeal is "appellant."

The appellant is the individual or party who challenges a decision or judgment made by a lower court, and they seek a review of that decision by a higher court. Appellant is the party who appeals a lower court's judgment or order to a higher court. Here are some additional details about appellants:

Role in the Appeals Process: The appellant plays a crucial role in the appeals process. They initiate the appeal by filing a formal document, typically known as a notice of appeal, with the appropriate appellate court. This document outlines the grounds for the appeal and requests a review of the lower court's decision.

Burden of Proof: As the appellant, the burden of proof generally rests on you to demonstrate to the appellate court that there are valid grounds for reversing or modifying the lower court's decision. This requires presenting legal arguments, supporting evidence, and referencing applicable laws or precedents.

Legal Representation: Appellants often seek legal representation from appellate attorneys who specialize in handling appeals. These attorneys have expertise in appellate law and are experienced in navigating the complexities of the appeals process.

Learn more about Appellant: https://brainly.com/question/29766399

#SPJ11

Answer: B is the correct answer

Explanation: I took the quiz and got it right. Plessy vs. Ferguson helped the united states allow segregation calling it constatuitional.

A store owner charges black customers more than Hispanic customers for the very same merchandise. The owner is most clearly engaging in discrimination.

The noun merchandise refers to things that can be offered or sold, just like the merchandise it truly is on the market at your neighborhood record shop or the merchandise offered via sidewalk providers in a large town. whilst you go into a shop, you are surrounded by products, whether or not it is food, apparel, or books.

Merchandise is the term used for any product that you can promote or purchase. Any top for sale is merchandise, a few examples consist of groceries in a grocery store, garments in a retail save, electronics on a website, or uncooked materials in a manufacturing warehouse.

Learn more about merchandise here: https://brainly.com/question/4716509

#SPJ4

Answer:

American horror story’s cast so hot because they are celebrities and famous people. Like if you are the director, you wouldn't hire someone unattractive. This answer goes to any other movies/series .

Answer:

Explanation:

It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.

In this case, to pay the local supplier before the funding deadline given by the importer and prior to exporting the goods, I would consider using a transfer or credit card as means of payment.

A transfer would involve directly transferring funds from my bank account to the local supplier's account, ensuring timely payment. Alternatively, I could use a credit card to make the payment to the local supplier, which would allow me to temporarily finance the transaction until I receive payment from the importer.

Both options provide a way to fulfill my obligation to the local supplier while awaiting the financing from the importer in my first transaction.

Learn more about payment mode here

https://brainly.com/question/32691151

#SPJ4

The group's false rumors and social media postings about Jessie might damage her reputation and mental health.

Jessie's conduct may not be criminal if she didn't use harsh language or threaten her harassers.

Jessie should consult a lawyer before acting.

Generally, It is not appropriate for the group of people to make false rumors and social media posts about Jessie, as it can cause harm to her reputation and mental health. This type of behavior is known as defamation, which is a false statement that harms someone's reputation. Jessie may have a case for defamation against the group of people if she can prove that the statements were false and caused harm to her reputation.

Additionally, the group of people's continued harassment of Jessie, even after she changed schools, may also constitute a form of harassment. In many jurisdiction Harassment is illegal and punishable by law.

As for Jessie's own actions, creating an anonymous social media account to confront her harassers and posting the conversation may not be illegal, as long as she did not use any offensive language or threaten them in any way. However, it is important to note that some jurisdictions have laws that prohibit revenge po/rn and posting private conversations without consent. Jessie should check the laws in her jurisdiction to ensure that her actions are legal.

In general, it is best for Jessie to seek legal advice from a lawyer before taking any action. The laws and evidence vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and a lawyer can help her navigate the legal process and determine the best course of action.

Read more about mental health issues

https://brainly.com/question/29023959

#SPJ1

Answer:

probability

Explanation:

Probability is the branch of mathematics concerning numerical descriptions of how likely an event is to occur, or how likely it is that a proposition is true. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where, roughly speaking, 0 indicates impossibility of the event and 1 indicates certainty.

This is an illustration of probability. As a result, Option (A) is the best decision.

Mathematical representations of the likelihood that an event will happen or that a proposition is true are dealt with in the discipline of mathematics known as probability. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where 1 denotes certainty and 0 denotes the impossibility of the event. An event is more likely to occur the more likely it is that it will.

Tossing a fair (unbiased) coin is a straightforward demonstration. The coin is fair, therefore both "heads" and "tails" are equally likely to occur; as a result, the chance of each outcome is equal. Additionally, the chance of either occurring is 1/2 (sometimes written as 0.5 or 50%), as there are no other

Hence, Option (A) is accurate.

Learn more about probability, from:

brainly.com/question/9793303

#SPJ5

Answer:Cause they can’t check it and if your doing good it helps

Explanation:

Answer:

is there a list of statemnts that you forgot orrrrr?

\

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.

The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.

The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.

The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.

To learn more about competency examinations, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/31646918

#SPJ4

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________

Answer:

the answer is D

Explanation:

The Defendants who plead an excuse defense admit criminal that what they did was wrong but argue that, under the circumstances, they should not be held responsible for their actions.

This defense is typically used when a defendant's actions were influenced by external factors such as mental illness, duress, or necessity. When a defendant pleads an excuse defense, they are essentially admitting to committing the criminal but are arguing that their actions were justified due to the circumstances at the time. For example, a defendant with a mental illness may argue that they were not in the right state of mind to fully understand the consequences of their actions. Or, a defendant who acted under duress may argue that they were forced to commit the crime and had no other choice. Ultimately, it is up to the judge or jury to determine whether the excuse defense is valid and whether the defendant should be held responsible for their actions. It is important to note that even if the excuse defense is accepted, the defendant may still face consequences such as mandatory treatment or rehabilitation programs.

learn more about criminal

https://brainly.com/question/32247537

#SPJ11

Answer:

Since the United States was established there was always a great importance to maintain a relationship between both the states and the nation, both politically and economically. In the late 1700's to the early 1800's, George Washington's treasurer, Alexander Hamilton, had opted for a "Bank of the United States", which was fully within Congress's authority. He was wanting the bank to circulate and print paper money and expand economic development. This was eventually signed into legislation and a national government was created. The Bank taxed both the states and the nation as a whole. The Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, did not support the national bank nor did his supporters, the Jefferson Democratic-Republicans. The bank's charter expired in 1811, and the supporters along with Jefferson wanted to block its renewal. This lead to various questions and conflicts such as "Could Congress charter a national bank?" or "Could the federal government tax the states?" The Barron vs Baltimore case ("James McCulloch, an agent for the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay a tax that Maryland had imposed on all out-of-state chartered banks") declared that the Bill of Rights could NOT restrict the powers of the state governments. After this, there was a rise of dual federalism. Dual federalism was the states and national government exercising exclusive authority in distinctly delineated spheres of jurisdiction. Then there was a rise of cooperative federalism, which was when both levels of government coordinated their actions to solve national problems, such as the Great Depression. Then came an era of new federalism which is what the nation uses today. By decentralizing policies, authority can blend between the national, state and local governments.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

true

The Criminal profiler cannot state whether a certain criminal committed the crime.

A criminal profile only provides a general description of the sort of individual who may have committed the crime. It does not refer to a specific person who happens to meet the characteristics. As a result,

It must be noted that offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative approach used by law enforcement organizations to identify potential suspects.

It has also been used by investigators to connect crimes that may have been perpetrated by the same offender.

Learn more about criminal profiler:

https://brainly.com/question/12000532

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think grid search could be used when you have many investigators available and are looking for the same person

Answer:

i felt something i never felt come closer ill give u all my love if u treat me right baby ill give u everything

Explanation:

According to the research on disparity and sentencing, racial minorities are sentenced more harshly when the victim is white. Hence, the correct option is A.

'Minority group' can be used in a variety of ways, depending on the situation. A minority group, according to its usual usage, can be easily understood in terms of demographic sizes within a population, i.e., the group in society with the fewest members is the "minority." For instance, non-Hispanic Whites are the majority (63.4%) in the United States, while all other racial and ethnic groups (including Mexicans, African Americans, Asian Americans, American Indians, and Native Hawaiians) are considered "minorities".

In comparison to both black defendants who victimize other blacks (particularly acquaintances) and white defendants who victimize whites, black defendants who victimize whites typically face harsher punishments. Blacks and Latinos sometimes receive harsher sentences than whites for lesser offenses like drug and property offenses. But Latinos and Blacks who are found guilty of serious drug charges also frequently receive harsher sentences than Whites in the same circumstances.

To learn more about Minority Group, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14948712

#SPJ11

Answer:

I guess the civil rights act

Explanation:

Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990) is a case that focuses on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

ETC International is a company that provides simulation and control systems to aerospace, aviation, and defense industries. In an attempt to secure a contract with the Mexican government, ETC made several payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, sued the company, claiming that these payments were made to obtain favorable treatment and violate the FCPA.Facts:Environmental Tectonics Corp. (ETC) is a firm based in Pennsylvania that offers simulation and control systems for aviation, aerospace, and defense businesses. In the early 1980s, the company sought to secure a contract with the Mexican government and, as part of that effort, made various payments to Mexican officials. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, filed a suit against the firm, alleging that the payments were made to secure favorable treatment and that the payments were in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Issues:The issue at hand is whether Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) made payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s to secure a contract with the Mexican government. In addition, whether the payments were made to gain a favorable treatment or violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Rule:The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a U.S. law enacted in 1977 that makes it unlawful for companies that trade in the United States to pay bribes to foreign officials to obtain business deals.Answer:The United States Supreme Court, in this case, ruled in favor of Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) and overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals. The Court held that the FCPA did not apply to this case since the payments made by ETC were not in connection with obtaining or retaining business. The Court also held that the SEC cannot enforce the FCPA with a civil action, and only the Department of Justice (DOJ) can. Finally, the Court found that a private party has no right of action under the FCPA.In conclusion, the Court's decision in Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), clarified the scope and limits of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although ETC made payments to Mexican officials, the Court held that the payments did not violate the FCPA because they were not made in connection with obtaining or retaining business. As a result, the Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals and held that Kirkpatrick had no right of action under the FCPA.

To Know More about obtaining visit:

brainly.com/question/2075542

#SPJ11

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

get appointed by Congress. I'm not so sure but it sounds right

The correct answer is C). The state employee assumed the risk of injury inherent in the job. A mining corporation kept explosives in a storage facility while running a distant copper mine. The state employee accepted the occupational risk of injury.

Under the legal principle known as "assumption of risk," a person is prohibited from suing for damages if they involuntarily exposed himself to a known danger. In certain states, taking on risk is viewed as contributing to negligence. In strict liability proceedings, assumption of risk cannot be used as a defence.

Even though a reasonable person would have been aware of such a risk, a plaintiff cannot accept a risk that he or she is uninformed of.

Read more about storage facility at

https://brainly.com/question/30461678

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The term "non-medical use of prescription pharmaceuticals" (NUPM) refers to the use of prescription drugs, whether obtained with or without a prescription. Hence option B is correct.

In a manner, for a purpose, or for a period of time other than those specified, or by a person for whom the medication was not intended.

Drugs are defined as substances that, when ingested, can alter physiology or psychology. Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and fillers are used in the majority of medications to increase volume. These are chemicals that aid in the treatment of illnesses and suffering.

Nonprescription medications

Common uses for these medicines exist. These don't have the same potency as prescription drugs. Use of these is risk-free.

Medications on prescription

As the name implies, you can only get these medications with a prescription froma qualified medical practitioner. These are quite specialized and stronger than over-the-counter medications.

Illicit drugs

Since some medications have serious negative effects, they should only be taken as prescribed. Hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, and ketamine are a few examples.

Find out more information on prescription pharmaceuticals, over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and illicit drugs here:

Learn more about Drugs here

https://brainly.com/question/18204963

#SPJ2

Answer:

Transnational organized crime (TOC) is organized crime coordinated across national borders, involving groups or markets of individuals working in more than one country to plan and execute illegal business ventures.

Explanation:

hope it becomes helpful to you ☺️☺️

good luck

Answer:

Transnational criminal networks such as organized crime groups, drug traffickers, and weapons dealers at times share convergence points—places, businesses, or people—to “launder” or convert their illicit profits into legitimate funds.

Explanation:

Unlike tra ditional crimes that occur within a single country, transnational crimes are distin guished by their multinational nature and cross border impact.

Examples of transnational crimes include: human trafficking, people smuggling, smuggling/trafficking of goods (such as arms trafficking and drug trafficking and illegal animal and plant products and other goods prohibited on environmental grounds ect.

The Rehnquist Court and the Warren Court were two distinct eras in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States, each associated with a particular approach to judicial decision-making. The answer is:

1. The Rehnquist Court is associated with b. Associated with its judicial restraint and conservatism.

2. The Warren Court is associated with a. Associated with judicial activism because of its far-reaching decisions that were not always directly connected to the immediate case.

The Rehnquist Court, named after Chief Justice William Rehnquist, was known for its conservative approach to judicial decision-making and a preference for judicial restraint, meaning it was cautious about expanding the court's role and interfering with legislative decisions.

The Warren Court, named after Chief Justice Earl Warren, was characterized by its more liberal and activist approach. It issued landmark decisions that had a broad societal impact, often reaching beyond the immediate facts of the cases before it. The Warren Court played a significant role in advancing civil rights, individual liberties, and criminal justice reform.

Therefore, the answer is:

1. The Rehnquist Court is associated with b. Associated with its judicial restraint and conservatism.

2. The Warren Court is associated with a. Associated with judicial activism because of its far-reaching decisions that were not always directly connected to the immediate case.

For more details regarding Rehnquist Court, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5038905

#SPJ4

Answer:

cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.

pros: no prison

Explanation:

Answer:

B - Major Crime

Explanation:

Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.