Margaret Sanger was most noted for her advocacy of birth control.
Hence, the correct option is c.
Margaret Sanger was a birth control activist and sex educator who fought for women's rights to access information and services related to contraception.
She believed that access to contraception was essential to women's ability to control their own bodies and lives, and that it was crucial to reducing poverty and improving public health.
In 1916, Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the United States in Brooklyn, New York, and was promptly arrested for violating obscenity laws.
Undeterred, she continued to advocate for birth control and founded the American Birth Control League, which eventually became Planned Parenthood.
Sanger's work was groundbreaking at the time, as contraception was widely considered taboo and illegal. Her advocacy helped to shift cultural attitudes towards birth control and paved the way for greater access to contraceptive services for women.
To know more about Margaret Sanger here:
https://brainly.com/question/4352969
#SPJ4
one speeding ticket can raise your auto insurance rate by nearly…
Yes, a single speeding ticket will increase your insurance rates by around 23%.
The best ways to lower your insurance bill after receiving a ticket are to look around for a less expensive insurance provider or, if your insurer permits it, enroll in a driver education course. If not, your rates will eventually go back to normal.
What company offers the cheapest car insurance after a ticket for speeding?
Of all the major insurance providers, State Farm has the lowest average rate increase following a ticket, at just 11%. Cheap rates are also available from Farm Bureau, Amica, and Auto-Owners for drivers with recent tickets.
Is insurance affected by a first-time speeding ticket?
Yes, a single speeding ticket will cause a 23% increase in your insurance costs. Multiple tickets, however, result in rates rising much more; for example, drivers with two tickets pay 67% more, and those
To know more about insurance here
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when _______________
In Texas, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when you are caught speeding in a work zone.
What is Work Zone?An region of a trafficway containing construction, maintenance, or utility work is known as a work zone. Signs, channeling systems, barriers, pavement markers, and/or work vehicles are frequently used to designate a work zone.
The standard fine is doubled if you are caught speeding in a construction zone. If there are any construction employees present, the penalties may be as high as $1,000. A $200 fine is assessed for driving in a construction zone. A speeding violation in a construction zone can result in fines of more than $2,000 in some cases.
Therefore, the fines for speeding or for violations of the law that occur in a Work Zone are doubled when an any work is in progress or construction workers are present.
To learn more about Work Zone, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3909716
#SPJ2
Write a brief summary (about 20 sentences) regarding the case about Amie Zyla . Be sure to include the circumstances of the case/law/crime, the year/s, names of the people involved (victim/s and offender/s), and the eventual outcome of all parties involved.
Based on a historical account, the case of Amie Zyla was considered startling and heartbreaking, as it underscored the devastating results of betrayal and greed. This occurrence left Robert Zyla physically and emotionally damaged, while Amie, Joshua, and Larry faced a lifetime behind bars
The Summary of a Case regarding Amie Zyle.In 2006, a disquieting case unfolded in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, about a woman named Amie Zyla and a conspiracy to murder her husband, Robert Zyla.
It was reported that Amie Zyla, along with her lover, Joshua Campbell, organized a plan to kill Robert and collect the insurance money.
During the investigation, it was revealed that Amie and Joshua, a former coworker, had been communicating largely through text messages and phone calls, reviewing their plan to murder Robert.
In February 2006, Amie and Joshua attempted to carry out their sinister plot by attracting Robert to a secluded location, where he was shot multiple times.
However, Robert survived the attack and managed to seek assistance, leading to the arrest of his wife, Amie, and her lover, Joshua.
In the end, Amie Zyla, Joshua Campbell, and an accomplice named Larry Detwiler were all charged with attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and criminal solicitation.
Over the cause of the trial, it was disclosed that the couple's motive was financial, as they wanted to collect Robert's life insurance payout.
Hence, eventually, by 2008, after a highly publicized trial, Amie Zyla, Joshua Campbell, and Larry Detwiler were found guilty on all charges. Amie was sentenced to 28 to 56 years in prison, while Joshua and Larry each received sentences of 27 to 55 years.
Learn more about Murder Cases here: https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ1
why does a party file interrogatories
Answer:
to learn more detail about the other partys case
Explanation:
just took test and got it right
Under the 12th amendment, if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes for president, _____.
The three candidates that garner most electoral college votes are chosen as president by the House and Senate if no candidate obtains a majority of those votes. Each delegate from a state gets one vote.
What does the word "Amendment" mean?The provisions of a contract and perhaps other instrument may be amended or supplemented. An amendment is a new addition or change that largely maintains the integrity of the original document. Other times, a modification completely delete the old content and replace it with fresh wording.
In layman's words, whatever is the First Amendment?Initial Amendment Explained. No law establishing a religion, forbidding its free practice, or restricting the right to free expression or the press may be passed by Congress.
To know more about Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Which of the following initial written agreements is NOT legally
binding?
A) Memorandum of understanding
B) Letter of intent
C) Mixed document
D) Impossible to determine
Answer: A) Memorandum of understanding
Explanation:
Que lo llevo hacer un gran ciclista a richard carapaz
Richard Carapaz is a great cyclist because :
His natural talent for cyclingHis hard work and dedicationHis mental strengthHow did Richard Carapaz become such a great cyclist ?Carapaz has continuously been a solid and quick cyclist, and he includes a natural capacity to climb slopes. Carapaz could be a exceptionally difficult laborer, and he is continuously seeking out for ways to progress his cycling. He puts in long hours of preparing, and he is continuously willing to thrust himself to the constrain.
Carapaz could be a exceptionally rationally intense cyclist, and he is able to remain centered and spurred indeed when things are intense. He incorporates a never-give-up demeanor, and he is continuously willing to battle for triumph.
Find out more on great cyclists at https://brainly.com/question/15980275
#SPJ4
how do corporations engage EPA when they are putting laws into regulations
Answer:
The corporations engage EPA when they are putting laws into regulations is described below in brief details.
Explanation:
Step 1: EPA Recommends a Regulation. The Agency investigates the problems and, if needed, recommends a regulation, also identified as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).
Step 2: EPA Examines Your Observations and Problems a Final Rule.
Step 3: The Regulation is Classified in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments?Yes he does because he stated that due to the reason of the White House not nominating the senior managers to replace those who were said to have left. the homeland security is said to be leaderless.
If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?If I had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, i will chose to keep it the same as it is the right thing to do, splitting will lead to more cost. The best thing is keeping it the same and appointment of leadership head.
Therefore, I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Learn more about Homeland Security from
https://brainly.com/question/850432
#SPJ1
The use of unreasonable force can be determined to be excessive and therefore may subject employees to
The use of unreasonable force, if determined to be excessive, may subject employees to legal consequences and disciplinary actions.
Law enforcement agencies and organizations have policies and regulations in place to govern the use of force by their employees. The use of force should be reasonable and proportionate to the circumstances at hand. If an employee uses force that is deemed unreasonable or excessive, there can be various legal and disciplinary consequences:
1. Legal Consequences: The use of excessive force by law enforcement officers can lead to legal repercussions, such as civil lawsuits or criminal charges. Individuals who have been subjected to excessive force can file lawsuits alleging violations of their constitutional rights, such as the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. If the court determines that the force used was excessive and violated the individual's rights, the employee may be held liable for damages.
2. Internal Disciplinary Actions: Law enforcement agencies typically have internal affairs divisions or equivalent units responsible for investigating allegations of misconduct, including the use of excessive force. If an employee's use of force is determined to be unreasonable or excessive through an internal investigation, they may face disciplinary actions, ranging from reprimands, suspensions, demotions, or even termination. The severity of the disciplinary actions depends on the specific policies and guidelines of the agency and the seriousness of the misconduct.
3. Criminal Charges: In cases where the use of force rises to the level of criminal conduct, employees may face criminal charges. Prosecutors can bring charges such as assault, battery, or manslaughter, depending on the circumstances and the level of harm caused by the excessive force. Criminal convictions can result in penalties including fines, probation, or imprisonment.
4. Loss of Professional Standing: The use of excessive force can damage an employee's professional reputation and standing within the law enforcement community. Instances of misconduct may lead to a loss of trust from colleagues, supervisors, and the public, making it difficult for the employee to continue their career in law enforcement.
It is essential for law enforcement agencies to have clear policies, training, and accountability mechanisms in place to prevent the use of unreasonable force and address instances of excessive force promptly and appropriately. By holding employees accountable for their actions, agencies can strive to maintain public trust and ensure the fair and just treatment of individuals.
To learn more about legal consequences click here: brainly.com/question/28357260
#SPJ11
for defenders, the last step in penetration testing is __________, during which vulnerabilities are fixed and the pen test steps are repeated to ensure the attack can't occur again.
The last step in penetration testing for defenders is remediation or mitigation, where vulnerabilities are fixed, and the pen test steps are repeated to verify the effectiveness of the security improvements and ensure that the system is better protected against future attacks.
What is the last step in penetration testing for defenders, where vulnerabilities are fixed and the pen test steps are repeated to ensure the attack can't occur again?For defenders, the last step in penetration testing is "remediation" or "mitigation."
Penetration testing is a proactive security assessment technique used to identify vulnerabilities in a system or network by simulating real-world attacks.
The purpose of penetration testing is to uncover weaknesses that could be exploited by attackers and provide actionable recommendations to improve security.
The last step, remediation or mitigation, involves addressing the vulnerabilities identified during the penetration testing process.
This step focuses on fixing the vulnerabilities and implementing necessary security measures to prevent similar attacks from occurring in the future.
During the remediation phase, organizations take appropriate actions to eliminate or minimize the risks associated with the identified vulnerabilities. This may involve patching software, updating configurations, strengthening access controls, or improving network infrastructure.
Once the remediation actions are implemented, it is crucial to repeat the pen test steps to ensure that the vulnerabilities have been effectively addressed and that the system or network is now resistant to similar attacks.
This retesting phase helps validate the effectiveness of the remediation efforts and provides assurance that the system has been fortified against potential threats.
Learn more about penetration testing
brainly.com/question/30750105
#SPJ11
the court of appeals for the federal circuit differs from the other courts of appeals because it
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) differs from the other courts of appeals because it not limited to geographic jurisdiction, and instead has nationwide jurisdiction on specific matters.
It was created in 1982 to hear appeals on particular subject matter such as patent law, trademark law, international trade law, and federal claims. The CAFC was established in response to the perception that specialized knowledge and experience was needed to decide cases in these areas, as opposed to leaving it to the various regional appellate courts to apply the law.
The judges of the CAFC have expertise in these areas, and the court has exclusive jurisdiction over many types of cases that are heard on appeal from district courts, including patent infringement cases and trademark cases. This specialization helps to promote consistency in decision-making and reduce the likelihood of conflicting decisions by different circuit courts.
To know more about court of appeals click here
brainly.com/question/39520
#SPJ11
The purpose of damages in contract law is to put the victim in the position he would have been in had the contract been properly performed. True False
False. The purpose of damages in contract law is not necessarily to put the victim in the position they contract had been properly performed.
The general principle in contract law is that damages are awarded to place the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled properly. This principle is known as the principle of "expectation damages." However, it is not always possible to precisely restore the injured party to their exact position before the breach occurred.
In some cases, it may be challenging or impossible to quantify certain losses or to recreate the exact circumstances that would have existed if the contract had been properly performed. In such situations, courts may award damages based on other principles, such as restitution or reliance damages, to provide a fair and reasonable compensation to the non-breaching party.
Therefore, while the goal of contract damages is generally to compensate for the losses suffered, it is not always to fully restore the victim to the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed.
Learn more about victim here
https://brainly.com/question/32406325
#SPJ11
what assumptions are made when people hear the label "criminal"?
When people hear the label "criminal," they tend to make assumptions about the individual that may or may not be accurate. These assumptions include the belief that criminals are dangerous, immoral, and incapable of change.
Many people assume that criminals are inherently bad people who have made a conscious choice to engage in criminal behavior. They may also assume that all criminals are poor, uneducated, and belong to certain racial or ethnic groups. These assumptions are problematic because they are often based on stereotypes and fail to recognize the complex social, economic, and psychological factors that contribute to criminal behavior.
Criminal behavior is the result of a combination of individual, social, and environmental factors that can be difficult to unravel. By reducing criminal behavior to a simplistic label, we ignore the root causes of criminal behavior and fail to address the underlying issues that contribute to it. In addition, the label "criminal" can stigmatize individuals and prevent them from reintegrating into society and leading productive lives after they have served their sentences. Therefore, it is essential to recognize that individuals who engage in criminal behavior are complex human beings who are capable of change and should be treated as such.
To know more about criminal behavior visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32241057
#SPJ11
Guided Practice
In what form of government does one person or a small group of people hold all of the power?
A. a constitution
B. a legislature
c. a democracy
D. a dictatorship
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do?
In the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, one stated goal is to "promote the general Welfare." Which of the following phrases has the same meaning as
"general Welfare"?
O Common good
O Legal system
O Rule of law
O Social contract
Answer: Common Good
Explanation: general welfare refers to what would be consiidered beneficial for all or most, or what comes with being a citizen, which is common good.
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors called in
Answer:
That should be a "no- load" fund
Explanation:
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors is called a no-load fund.
Which fund does not charge any type of sales load?
A no-load mutual fund means there will not be a sales charge when the investor buys the shares or when they sell their shares.
What is the sales charge on a mutual fund called?load
A sales charge is an additional fee paid by an investor that is used to compensate the broker or salesman for effecting that transaction. In mutual funds, the sales charge is typically called a 'load', which may be charged up-front, at the time of sale, or some other arrangement.
What are the 4 types of mutual funds?What types of mutual funds are there? Most mutual funds fall into one of four main categories – money market funds, bond funds, stock funds, and target-date funds. Each type has different features, risks, and rewards.
Learn more about Mutual funds at https://brainly.com/question/4521829
#SPJ2
Which of the following amendments concern bail for arrested suspects?
Group of answer choices
Answer:
it might be amendment 4 or 6
Explanation:
Por qué la empatía y el asertividad son habilidades de la comunicación que permiten una mejor adaptación social?
Explanation:
Los seres humanos son seres sociales, por lo que existe la necesidad de desarrollar y mejorar las habilidades de comunicación para que haya una mejor adaptación social en cada entorno que los individuos necesitan para socializar, como en su comunidad local y en el entorno laboral.
Hay dos características que pueden ayudar en esta adaptación social, que es la empatía y la asertividad, que son habilidades que se complementan entre saber escuchar y saber hablar, porque una persona empática es capaz de comprender al otro emocional y cognitivamente, poniéndose en su lugar otro individuo para comprender y escuchar sin juzgar, pero generando identificación y aceptación. Una persona asertiva, en cambio, es aquella que defiende sus opiniones y se comunica de forma clara, directa y objetiva, pero no de forma agresiva, sino a través de una postura firme que genera seriedad y transparencia en la comunicación.
HURRY PLEEASEE Click this link to view O*NET’s Tasks section for Lawyers. Note that common tasks are listed toward the top, and less common tasks are listed toward the bottom. According to O*NET, what are some common tasks performed by Lawyers? Check all that apply.
According to O*NET, some common tasks performed by Lawyers are:
electing jurors, arguing motions, meeting with judges, and questioning witnessesinterpreting laws, rulings, and regulations for individuals and businessesrepresenting clients in court or before government agenciespresenting evidenceWhat are general tasks performed by Lawyers?In legal matters and disputes, a lawyer advises and represents businesses, individuals, and government agencies. The primary responsibilities of a lawyer are to uphold the law while protecting the rights of their clients.
Lawyers provide legal advice, conduct research, and gather evidence or information, draft legal documents such as contracts, divorce decrees, or real estate transactions, and defend or prosecute in court. Lawyers can practice in a variety of areas, including corporate, family, bankruptcy, and environmental law.
Read more about Lawyers
brainly.com/question/20397360
#SPJ1
which country recently flew a hot air spy balloon over the united states?O ChineseO AustraliaO RussiaO Iran
On February 4, the U.S. Air Force shot down the balloon over U.S. territorial waters off the coast of South Carolina, on the order of U.S. President Joe Biden Debris from the wreckage was recovered.
The Chinese government insisted that the balloon was a civilian (primarily meteorological) airship that had been blown off course while the American and Canadian armies claimed that it was used for spying. [6] According to the U.S., the balloon was equipped with intelligence surveillance technology that was incompatible with a weather balloon and was capable of geolocating electronic messages. [7] It also noted that Chinese spy balloons of a comparable design have flown over more than 40 countries. [8] [7] Analysts noted that it had a different flight path and structural features from a normal weather balloon. [9] [10][11] Later, American authorities admitted that they had monitored the Chinese balloon ever since it took off from Hainan. Its initial targets were probably Guam and Hawaii, but the prevailing winds carried it across North America instead of to its intended destinations.
Learn more about united states here:
https://brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ4
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
Opening statements are just statements, and cannot be considered as evidence by the jury
True or False
Answer:
I say false
Explanation:
Why do you think full-time college students ages 18–22 drink more often and more heavily than their peers who are not in college
Is this an opinion question? If so I think it is because of the major amount of stress they are put in to "have a good life" "get a good job" and "be successful". A lot of them just SNAP
James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case
presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial conversation in the hallway,
James talks to Judge Danner about the woman's restraining order stating she moved into her parents home out of fear, but her parents' home is not on the list of addresses banned on the restraining order. Judge Danner decides to write the parents' address on a photocopy of the restraining order and authenticated the document without adding the new document to the court records.
A. Ethical
B. Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical as it would be considered "ex parte"
Explanation:
ex parte- with respect to or in the interests of one side only or of an interested outside party.
he had an unnoficial conversation
in what ways does the bill of rights, paired with the fourteenth amendment, limit the rights of the states vs. the federal government, and in what ways does it protect individual americans? equal protection of the laws means every place/state/citizens that the law applies to will follow the same law. the place/state/citizens cannot change or break the law.
Answer:
The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, in conjunction with the Fourteenth Amendment, establishes a framework for protecting individual rights and limiting the powers of both the federal government and the states. While the Bill of Rights primarily focuses on safeguarding individual liberties, the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that these rights are applied equally to all citizens.
Limiting the Powers of the Federal Government:
First Amendment: The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. It prohibits the federal government from interfering with these fundamental rights and ensures that individuals have the freedom to express themselves without censorship or persecution.
Second Amendment: The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms. It restricts the federal government from infringing on an individual's right to own firearms, ensuring the right to self-defense.
Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It places limitations on the federal government's ability to conduct searches without probable cause or obtaining a warrant, thereby safeguarding individuals' privacy rights.
Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment includes protections such as the right to due process, protection against self-incrimination, and safeguards against double jeopardy. It ensures that the federal government respects an individual's rights to fair treatment and prevents coercion in legal proceedings.
Limiting the Powers of the States:
Fourteenth Amendment: The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, extends the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states. It includes the Equal Protection Clause, which requires states to provide equal treatment under the law to all individuals within their jurisdiction. This provision restricts state governments from implementing discriminatory laws or policies that infringe upon an individual's rights.
Protecting Individual Americans:
First Amendment: The First Amendment protects the freedom of religion, speech, and assembly for individuals across the United States. It ensures that citizens have the right to express their beliefs, worship freely, engage in political activism, and criticize the government without fear of retribution.
Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment safeguards individuals from unwarranted searches and seizures by both the federal government and state authorities. It protects citizens' privacy and ensures that law enforcement must have probable cause or a valid warrant before conducting searches or seizing property.
Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process rights, ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and have the right to a fair trial. It also protects against self-incrimination and ensures that individuals cannot be tried for the same offense multiple times.
Fourteenth Amendment: The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause ensures that all individuals receive equal treatment under the law, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or other protected characteristics. It prohibits discrimination andand promotes equal rights for all citizens.
In summary, the Bill of Rights, in combination with the Fourteenth Amendment, establishes a framework that both limits the powers of the federal government and protects individual Americans. It safeguards fundamental rights and ensures that the government, at both federal and state levels, respects the equal protection of the law and upholds individual liberties
Why is evidence of a habit considered admissible in many cases? Because it shows that a person has a pattern of truthfulness or untruthfulness. Because it shows that someone is not likely to be the type of person to engage in a specific activity. Because it shows that someone is likely to have been in a specific place at a certain time. Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Answer:
Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Explanation:
Evidence of a habit is considered admissible in many cases in court because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
This is because, the habit of a person is used to prove that the conduct of such person during a given occasion is consistent with his/her habits.