Answer:
Explanation: According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, democracy consists of four key elements: a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; protection of the human rights of all citizens
An appeals court is most likely to overturn a trial court's verdict it!
OA. the defendant received a long prison sentence.
B. the prosecution has new evidence against a defendant.
OC. the judge did something wrong during the trial.
OD. a witness has come forward with new information.
SUB
Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Assuming the root canal will cost $1,200 and the crown will cost $1,000, how much will Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed?
Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Assuming the root canal will cost $1,200 and the crown will cost $1,000, how much will Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed?
The amount that Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed is $1,200.
What is an insurance?Insurance is a tool for risk management. You purchase protection against unforeseen financial losses when you purchase insurance. If something bad happens to you, the insurance company pays you or someone else of your choosing. If an accident occurs and you don't have insurance, you might be liable for all associated expenses.
In this case, Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Since the root canal will cost $1,200, he will be responsible for the whole amount.
Learn more about insurance on:
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ1
What is an example of an outcome of a Supreme Court decision that was quickly overturned by a Constitutional Amendment?
“separate but equal” facilities
anti-monopoly statutes
restrictions on political campaign contributions
voting age inconsistencies
The example of the results of the Supreme Court decision that was quickly overturned by a Constitutional Amendment was “separate but equal” facilities. Thus, option first is correct.
What is the best way to override a Supreme Court decision?When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional question, its decision is nearly irrevocable; only the seldom used method of constitutional amendment or a fresh ruling by the Court can change it.
In the 1954 case of Brown v. Board of Education, for example, the Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It overturned the previous judgement in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had established the concept of "separate but equal" facilities.
"Separate but equal" facilities were an example of the outcomes of a Supreme Court ruling that was shortly repealed by a Constitutional Amendment. As a result, option first is correct.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
"________________" jurisdiction deals with cases that have been heard at lower levels; "______________" jurisdiction deals with cases heard for the first time. Lesser; Supreme Supreme; Lesser Appellate; Original Original; Appellate
Answer:
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
The first blank is appellate - during this time they can change the decisions of the lower court
The second one is original - it's the first time hearing of the said case.
Answer:
The first blank is appellate - during this time they can change the decisions of the lower court
The second one is original - it's the first time hearing of the said case.
QUESTION 4
Police officers have incredible decision-making authority (descretion) when dealing with citizens and suspects.
True
False
Answer:
false
Explanation
it depends are you saying all police officers have incredible decision making or some but if you're saying all, some police officers aren't really good at making incredible decisions
Jordan is on a ride along with Officer Leo. Officer Leo pulls over a car for making an illegal turn. When he goes up to talk to the driver, he sees a bag of what appears to be illegal drugs on the passenger seat. No one else is in the car. Officer Leo tells the driver to get out of the car. He places the driver in handcuffs, since he is the only officer there, and tells him that he needs to check for weapons. The officer searches the inside of the car and then the trunk. He doesn't find any weapons, but he does find more drugs in the trunk. Only then does he arrest the driver and return to the station. A colleague processes the driver, and Officer Leo and Jordan go back out.
Are the drugs from the passenger seat of the car the result of a legal search? Why or why not?
What about the drugs from the trunk of that same car? Support you answer.
Answer:
The answer above is wrong.
Explanation:
It is legal for an officer to search a motorist's automobile as long as he has a valid justification for doing so. When there is a probable cause, Officer Leo may also search the trunk of the car.
Hope this helps :)
The federal, state and local governments in the United States have clear, explicit drug laws. Even if you're not using drugs and the drugs aren't yours, being around them can justify an arrest and conviction. Depending on your state's laws, even possessing drug paraphernalia may result in an arrest.
What happens if you find drugs?They will most likely be arrested unless they can demonstrate on the spot that someone else had access to the area and maybe the owner of the drugs. If this occurs to you, it is critical that you do not resist arrest and instead remain polite and respectful. Simultaneously, refrain from providing any information other than your identity.
If drugs are discovered in a vehicle, the driver, passengers, or a combination of both can be charged with illegal drug possession and held liable. Even if a passenger is caught with drugs, the driver may be charged with constructive possession.
Learn more about Drugs here:
https://brainly.com/question/13294633
#SPJ2
Which statement is true about oral contracts?
A. They are best used for complex agreements.
B. They cannot be enforced in the event of a breach.
C. They are used for real estate contracts.
D. They must include all terms and elements.
The answer is B-They cannot be enforced in the event of a breach. Without having the written contract, it is extremally difficult to enforce a oral contract. That is why most people who do oral contracts have it recorded for later use.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer: the correct answer is D.
Explanation:
just took the test, the people in the comments are right. The answer is D.
what does the irs do to encourage people to comply with tax laws?
What percent of people with a serious mental illness commit violent acts?
89%
42%
65%
5%
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
please help i got points
What are the two reason a person can appeal a court case decision?
Appeals in either civil or criminal cases are usually based on arguments that there were errors in the trial's procedure or errors in the judge's interpretation of the law. The party appealing is called the appellant, or sometimes the petitioner.
thank you, and may I have Brainliest? :)
How are indoor crime scenes typically searched for evidence?
Answer:
By forensic scientist, its usually a difficult task to do and you have to be precise
Explanation:
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland?
Group of answer choices.
A. It helped local governments use direct democracy.
B. It denied states the right to control local governments.
C. It supported the strength of local governments over states.
D. It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
E. It showed how the national government’s power needs to be checked.
Answer:
D. It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
Explanation:
McCulloch v. Maryland was a litigation or court case between the national bank known as The Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland with respect to the tax that was imposed on it by the state.
Basically, the state of Maryland passed a legislation to impose taxes on bank notes ($15,000 annually) of any bank that is not chartered in the state of Maryland.
However, James W. McCulloch who was head at the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank objected and refused to pay the tax. Consequently, the appellate court of Maryland ruled that the Second Bank was established unconstitutionally because the federal government is not provided a textual commitment by the constitution to charter a bank.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Marshall ruled that the Federal government of USA has certain implied powers accorded or given to it by the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution but are not explicitly stated therein.
Hence, the effect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland was that it legitimized the power of the national government over states by invoking the doctrine of implied powers to increase its federal authority.
A plaintiff has brought an action for personal injuries against a store, in connection with an incident in which he slipped and fell after the store's linoleum floors had been mopped. A major issue at trial is the degree of moisture that remained on the floor, because it had been mopped 45 minutes before the plaintiff walked on it. The store offers the testimony of an expert, who will testify about an experiment he conducted measuring the amount of time necessary for a linoleum floor to dry completely after having been mopped. Under what condition should the court admit this testimony
Answer: It is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.
Explanation:
The condition under which the court should admit the testimony is that it is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.
The testimony of the expert will only be relevant and applicable of it was similar to the scenario which led to the accident. In such case, it will be admissible if it's relevant.
As long as the conditions of the experiment of the expert replicated the conditions regarding the accident, then the experiment is said to be relevant.
Summary and conclusion of computer forensic
Many who have experienced mediation say that they have more control over the resolution. Which of the following statements best explains that sentiment?
O Mediation also works in businesses, in commercial disputes, in neighborhood disagreements. It is great!
© Mediation is achieved by legal professionals that assist two or more persons to reach a settlement.
O Mediation is confidential.
I thought I was 100 percent right, and mediation taught me that there are two sides and there are ways of solving disagreements.
Many who have experienced meditation say that they have more control over the resolution the statements best explains that sentiment is meditation is confidential.
What is meditation?Your sensation of quiet, peace, and balance that meditation can bring you can help your physical and emotional health. By concentrating your attention on something peaceful, you can also utilize it to unwind and manage stress. You can learn to keep your focus and maintain inner serenity by practicing meditation.5 guidelines for effective meditation Being mindful of the present.controlling the negative thoughts.being conscious of the meditation toolwaking up to reality.unflinching dedication.The fact that meditation generates changes in our awareness is what makes it so effective.Many people identify too strongly with their thoughts and feelings, which prolongs them and makes them seem larger than life. We can suffer from certain ideas or emotions for days on end.To learn more about meditation from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/19069324
#SPJ13
what safeguards and guidelines have been put in place to stop innocent defendants from being coerced into pleading guilty?
Answer:
I'm not really sure, but I think the reading of the Miranda rights is one of them and then there is the fifth amendment of the constitution which tells us that "no individual shall be forced in a criminal case to be a witness against himself in the case."
Explanation:
\(Hope\) \(this\) \(helps!\) \(Have\) \(a\) \(good\) \(day!\) \(:)\)
Examine the following diagram:
Federalists
Wanted a strong
central government
to share power
with the states
Supported
ratification
Anti-Federalists
?
Opposed
ratification
Diagram copyright Discovery Education
Which phrase completes the diagram?
Worried about abuses of individual rights
Objected to separation of powers
Opposed the institution of slavery
Wanted a more unified national system
Answer:
wanted a more unified national system
The use of alcohol can cause
Answer:
The use of Alcohol over time, can cause diseases and other serious problems including: High blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, liver disease, and digestive problems.
Explanation:
High Blood Pressure, Heart Disease, Stroke's, Liver Disease, Digestive Problem's, Cancer Of The Breast, Mouth, Throat, Esophagus, Liver, And Colon.
Hope This Help's
Identify THREE groups of people who are responsible for enforcing laws within the country
Answer:
President,police and the judge
Which type of lawyer makes the most money?
2. If you were going to study some aspect of crime, what research method would you use? Why would you use this method? What advantages would this method give you as you studied your topic?
Answer:
One common research method for studying crime is quantitative research, which involves the use of statistical analysis to examine patterns and relationships between variables. This method is advantageous because it can provide a large amount of data and allow for generalizations to be made about the population being studied. For example, a researcher may use quantitative research to study the relationship between poverty and crime rates in a particular city, using data from official crime reports and socioeconomic indicators.
Explanation:
The U.S. House of Representatives is part of the executive branch of the federal government.
True False
Answer: False
Explanation:
It is part of the legislative branch
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If you ever get confused about the U.S. government, just remember this simple rhyme: The House and the Senate make the laws, the President and the Cabinet enforce them with their claws. The House is part of Congress, not the executive, that would be nonsense. The Congress controls the money and the bills, the executive deals with foreign ills. So don't mix up the branches or you'll get a scolding, they have different functions and different roles for upholding.
All Jokes aside.... And all rhymes aside....Here is the serious version....
(Though that should be a song o(≧▽≦)o ) ....
The U.S. House of Representatives is one of the two chambers that make up the legislative branch of the federal government, along with the Senate. The legislative branch has the power to create and pass laws, as well as to control the federal spending. The executive branch, on the other hand, is composed of the President, the Vice President, and the Cabinet members. The executive branch has the power to execute and enforce laws, as well as to conduct foreign relations.
In what ways have federal
mandates eroded the power of state and local
governments?
Answer:
One way that the federal government can influence the states is through the distribution of grants, incentives, and aid. State and local governments are eager to obtain federal dollars, but many of those dollars come with strings attached.
Which situation is
an example of indirect taxation?
which statement best completes the diagram? need answered asap please n thanks
The statement that best completes the diagram is option A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces Enlightenment ideas to its readers.
What is the statement about?The Pennsylvania Gazette, established by the esteemed Benjamin Franklin, was highly circulated throughout the colonies and effectively promoted the tenets of the Enlightenment, such as personal freedoms, reason, and inherent entitlements, to the general populace.
Therefore, The colonial leaders were significantly influenced by Enlightenment principles, leading to their ratification of the Declaration of Independence during the Second Continental Congress.
Learn more about Enlightenment from
https://brainly.com/question/1688832
#SPJ1
See text below
Question 1 of 10
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Diagram is:
The Second Continental Congressratifies the Declaration of Independence.
__
Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.
Options
A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces
Enlightenment ideas to its readers.
B. British military forces are told to withdraw from the colonies as
punishment for their disloyalty.
C. Colonial leaders reject the concept of natural rights because of its
association with Great Britain.
D. British leaders conclude that the only way to control the colonies.
is by enforcing a strict social contract
What are your opinions about police that do bad things
Answer:
They need to get punishment for thier deeds.
Explanation:
Police's job is to take care of the civilians and forbid bad deeds and make sure people are living happily and safely. If they commit bad deeds like the criminals, they are not worthy of the job.
County and city governments have no direct control over this part
of their budget, as it is a requirement of law.
The part of the budget that county and city governments have no direct control over as it is a requirement of law is: the debt service.
What is debt service?The repayment of the principal and interest on any loans or outstanding obligations that the government has undertaken is referred to as debt service. These debts are frequently issued to fund capital investments like public buildings or infrastructure projects.
Therefore, county and municipal governments are required by law to set aside a specific amount of their budget for debt service payments, and they have little leeway to change or lower those payments.
Learn more about debt service here:https://brainly.com/question/31325359
#SPJ1
This regulation opens meetings to the public.
a.
Nineteenth Amendment
c.
security classification system
b.
Sunshine Act
d.
Civil Rights Act
4. What is one downside of federalism?
ents
A. It allows laws to be inconsistent from state to state.
B. It favors urban residents over rural residents.
C. It promotes unity without uniformity.
me
D. It forces states to adopt the same laws.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It allows laws to be inconsistent from state to state.