L 4.2.5 Quiz: Exchange Rates
Question 5 of 10
An increase in the trade-weighted value of the U.S. dollar would most likely
lead U.S. consumers to:
A. buy more goods from foreign countries.
B. spend money on domestic products instead of imports.
C. invest more money in international currencies.
O D. save more money to account for rising inflation.
Answers
Answer:
c i think
Explanation:
beacrse
Related Questions
why isn't full employment the same as zero unemployment
Answers
Answer:There are different types of unemployment, and some are unavoidable or even necessary for a functioning labor market.
Explanation:At any given time, jobs are being created and destroyed as industries evolve, and the transition from old jobs to new is not seamless.
What is a judicial review?
A The authority of the Supreme Court to declare laws or actions unconstitutional
B
The authority of a court to sentence a defendant.
C) The authority of a court to hear an appeal from a lower court.
Answers
Answer:
...A.) the authority of the supreme court to declare to laws or actions unconstitutional.
why did stephen f. austin change his mind to support texas independence from mexico?
Answers
Stephen F. Austin initially sought to secure greater autonomy and rights for the American settlers in Texas within the Mexican government.
However, his views shifted as tensions escalated between the Mexican government and the Texian settlers. The catalyst for his change of mind was the Mexican government's shift towards centralization and the abolition of the Mexican Constitution of 1824, which had granted certain rights and autonomy to the states. This move, coupled with the growing discontent among the Texian settlers over issues such as taxation, representation, and cultural differences, led Austin to support the cause of Texas independence. He believed that separation from Mexico would provide the opportunity to establish a self-governing republic that better aligned with the desires and aspirations of the Texian settlers.
learn more about autonomy here
https://brainly.com/question/17174025
#SPJ11
Exploring the Essential Question
Making Connections Imagine that you are a detective on the police force in your city. Your
supervisors believe that a local shipping and delivery business is really a front for moving and selling
drugs in your state and beyond. They think that the business receives large shipments of illegal
drugs disguised as car parts. It then distributes them around town using a fleet of delivery trucks.
As an investigator, what would you want to examine to learn more about this case and gather
evidence? Make a list of the places you would want to look, records you would want to see, and
evidence you might look for. How might your investigation violate the privacy of people associated
with the shipping and delivery business?
Answers
Answer: send an undercover officer in, tap the phones
Explanation:
The first thing you want to do is gather physical evidence, buy a used car part and see if there are drugs inside. You also wanna stake out their shop and observe their movements and if you see any make sure you get it on video and put it in your report. Also go through their trash and try to find physical evidence. send in an wired undercover officer, and tap their phones and try to catch any suspicious phone calls. Once you have done all of these things. type up a warrant and get it signed by a judge.
What realistic advantage do county commissioners realize when they move to a system of government that includes hiring a county administrator?
Answers
Answer: The county administrator has the experience and managerial skills required to recruit, hire, train, and retain the best employees possible to carry out the policies of the county and its commissioners.
Explanation: Brainlest Please
a world health organization document that attempts to restrict advertising of cigarettes is ignored by tobacco companies in the united states. this is an example of which of the following principles of u.s. health law? group of answer choices a provision of international law does not apply in the united states unless united states law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the united states congress. the interstate commerce clause of the united states constitution has been used as a basis for justifying federal action in the area of health. police powers allow states to pass legislation and take actions to protect the common good.
Answers
A) A provision of International law does not apply in the United States unless United States law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the United States Congress.
Historically, the prevention and control of communicable diseases had been done by way of sanitation, safe water, meal supply, isolation, and immunization.
EBPH is the improvement, implementation, and assessment of powerful packages and guidelines in public fitness via the application of standards of clinical reasoning, such as systematic makes use of statistics and information structures and appropriate use of software making plans fashions.
Learn more about ratification here https://brainly.com/question/7458577
#SPJ4
James is a police officer on patrol when he witnesses a man snatch a woman’s purse from her and run away. In one paragraph describe what should be considered.
Answers
Answer:
The direction the suspect ran, visual descriptions of suspect , and if he said anything to the women
The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him, and whether or not he made any comments to the women.
What is visual descriptions?Information on the visual appearance of places, things, people, and more is provided via visual descriptions. The phrase "visual description" can refer to both image and audio descriptions as well as real-time descriptions of the visual environment of a place, person, or space.
An image description gives someone with a print disability, such as the blind or visually impaired, the same or equal information that a sighted reader would obtain when they look at a picture. Alt-text and Long Description are two formats in which image descriptions can be inserted in digital content.
Thus, The suspect's running direction, any visual descriptions of him.
For more information about visual descriptions, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3399699
#SPJ2
2. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether
Damms had taken enough steps to attempt
to murder Marjory Damms according to the
Wisconsin statute. In the case of state v. damms
Answers
Actors who attempt to conduct crimes that they plan to do are nonetheless guilty of the crime even
If it is impossible and the actor is unaware of it.
A clear action taken with the intention of committing a crime suffices to qualify.
Since the actor knows he did all required to ensure the planned crime was committed, he cannot avoid punishment due to the fortunate situation that the desired outcome was unattainable due to a fact he was not aware of to murder Marjory Damms.
Defendant was found guilty of attempting to murder someone. In his appeal, the defendant maintained that because the pistol was empty, it was impossible for him to have committed the murder, and as a result, he was not guilty of the crime.
According to the defendant, the statutory phrase "save for the involvement of some other extraneous circumstance" in Wis. Stat. 939.32(2) applied to the inability of achievement caused by the pistol not being loaded. Additionally, the defendant claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to find him guilty of attempted murder.
To know more about murder visit:https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ9
courts have ruled that the government may place reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner on free speech.
Answers
Yes, that is correct. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the government may place reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of free speech.
This is known as the "time, place, and manner" restrictions, and they are meant to regulate speech in a way that still protects an individual's First Amendment rights. However, these restrictions must be content-neutral, meaning they cannot discriminate against a particular viewpoint or type of speech. For example, the government may restrict a protest from taking place in a residential neighborhood at night, but they cannot restrict a protest simply because they disagree with the message.
Overall, the "time, place, and manner" restrictions are meant to balance the right to free speech with the need for public safety and order.
Learn more about free speech https://brainly.com/question/24485791
#SPJ11
Which does the Supreme Court NOT currently consider when evaluating issues of entrapment?
Answers
Whether police actions provided essential elements to a crime when the Supreme Court NOT currently consider when evaluating issues of entrapment .
What the police can do to convince you they are not cops ?
If you ask a police officer if they are a cop, they may lie to you. Undercover police may and will use a number of strategies to make you believe they are not in fact law enforcement. Most frequently, we witness the application of these strategies during "Mr. Big" operations. A "Mr. Big" operation is a well-known Canadian police strategy that effectively enables the authorities to establish a fictitious criminal gang that finally results in a confession from a suspect using a number of various techniques.
Since there has already been a lot published about "Mr. Big" activities in Canada, this blog won't go into great length about them. As I indicated, these frequently happen during Mr. Big operations, but not always. Instead, I want to concentrate on particular police strategies undercover agents will employ to make people think they are not the police.
To learn more about Undercover police checkout the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/13761769
#SPJ9
The advantages and disadvantages of the public budget
Answers
Answer:
DISADVANTAGES:-Rigid decision makingTime required.Gaming the system.Blame for outcomes.Expense allocations.Use it or lose it.Only considers financial outcomes.ADVANTAGES:-Profitability review.Assumptions review.Performance evaluations.Funding planning.Bottleneck analysisPlanning orientation.Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
Part I
A. A plaintiff is suing for damages resulting from a fall in the supermarket.
Which court should the plaintiff file in?
B. A trial judge did not supply a Russian-speaking defendant in a theft case
with an interpreter and the defendant is convicted. To which court should
the defendant appeal?
C. A defendant is charged with kidnapping a child and taking the child to five
different states. Where would the case be heard?
I
D. Several of the federal circuit courts of appeal are in disagreement over
whether a campaign finance reform law violates the First Amendment. What
is the only court that could decide to hear the case?
Answers
Answer:
Tenemos que el condenado es la persona que va a la cárcel debido la realización de diferentes delitos.
El imputado o acusado es una persona que se le acusa de diferentes delitos pero que todavía no ha sido demostrada la veracidad de esta acusación.
Cuando a un imputado se le demuestra frente a un juicio que es responsable de diferentes delitos se le aplica una condena y por ende pasa a ser un condenado.
dame corazon y 5 estrellas todo lo que miran
Explanation:
In State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because ____________.
Answers
In State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party.
In the case of State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party. The Third Party Doctrine holds that when a person shares their information with a third party, they no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
As a result, the information becomes the property of the third party.In other words, when Patino sent text messages to another person, he effectively relinquished his privacy rights over that information. Because the recipient of the messages was a third party, the police had the legal right to access the messages without violating the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Learn more about Amendment's protections https://brainly.com/question/28949431
#SPJ11
What is the scientific method? Why is it important in Criminal Investigation?
Answers
The scientific method is a tool that helps criminology and criminal justice researchers systematically study crime and justice using methods that are logical and reduce the likelihood of error. This is useful for criminal investigation.
In criminal investigation, the scientific method is utilised to help solve crimes and give evidence in criminal processes. This method is used to assist law enforcement and scientists in determining if an individual has been the victim of a crime or has committed a crime.
The scientific approach also assists real-world investigators and law enforcement professionals in solving crimes by implementing methodological measures that promote objectivity and reduce errors during a criminal investigation.
Therefore, scientific method is important in criminal investigation.
To learn more on criminal investigation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12190224
#SPJ1
As the American population ages what impact will this have on voting patterns? Which
states and regions are expected to grow in importance and why?
Answers
As the American population ages voter turnout would increase. States with more aging population would become important.
In a presidential election year, the youngest voters, those aged 18 to 29, turn out at a rate of 47-65 percent, while those in their 60s surpasses an 80 percent turnout rate. In midterm elections, those under 30 vote at a rate of 17-35 percent, while those in their 60s vote at a rate of 70 percent. Voter turnout increased with age, educational attainment, and income. Voter turnout was highest among those aged 65 to 74, at 76.0%, and lowest among those aged 18 to 24, at 51.4%.
Learn more on Voter turnout-
https://brainly.com/question/1270103
#SPJ4
Kent enters into a contract with Life Insurance Company for a policy that designates Mia as the beneficiary. Kent reserves the right to change the designated beneficiary. Mia’s rights under the policy are
Answers
Mia’s rights under the life insurance policy are contingent on Kent’s actions as the policyholder. While Mia is currently designated as the beneficiary, Kent reserves the right to change the beneficiary at any time. This means that Mia’s rights to the policy benefits are not guaranteed and could potentially be revoked if Kent chooses to make a change.
Life insurance policies can be complex, and it’s important for both policyholders and beneficiaries to understand the terms and conditions outlined in the policy. In this case, Mia’s rights are dependent on Kent’s actions as the policyholder, and any changes made by Kent could potentially impact Mia’s ability to receive the policy benefits.
It’s important for beneficiaries to communicate with policyholders and ensure that they are aware of any changes that may be made to the policy, as well as to regularly review the policy to ensure that it still meets their needs and expectations.
Learn more about insurance
brainly.com/question/989103
#SPJ11
The body of a 22-year-old male murder victim is discovered in his apartment by his landlord. He was found face down on his bed. The name "Joe" is written in blood just above the bed, in the victim's hand writing. A defence lawyer would view this evidence as
Answers
Answer:
A defense attorney would see this evidence as not very accurate, since "Joe" is a very common name and does not point directly to a culprit.
Explanation:
The evidence left by the victim is accurate, since the name "joe" is extremely common and does not point directly to a specific person, in addition, the word "Joe" can be an unfinished word, which makes the evidence even more unspecified and weak, requiring further investigation so that a conclusion can be drawn to the case.
Answer:
Explanation:
orange
Article 35.00 of New York State Penal Law is also called
Answers
Answer:
The Penal Law of the State of New York
Explanation:
The Penal Law of the State of New York combines justification and necessity into a single article, Article 35. "Defense of Justification" comprises sections 35.05 through 35.30 of the Penal Law. The general provision relating to necessity, section 35.05, provides: § 35.05 Justification; generally.
:)
Family law is handled by which type of court?
Answers
Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
gaily cort
Explanation:
guiiiiiiiifet6jnff
After your case is reviewed by the District Court of Appeals and they determine not to
review your case, who could you appeal to next?
County Courts
Circuit Courts
District Court of
Appeals
State Supreme Court
Answers
Answer: your answer is C
Explanation: i took the quiz on edgen 2021
Which Act allows a new state to join the country?
Answers
To what extent do you believe than non-compete agreements are justifiable to prevent former employees from revealing confidential information to competitors? Should courts prevent companies from requiring employees to sign very broad non-compete agreements or is this just an aspect of the free market? Under what conditions would you be willing to sign an NCA? Give Examples.
Please add references
Answers
Non-compete Agreements (NCAs) are contracts between employers and employees, prohibiting the latter from working for competitors or establishing their own ventures within a specied period following their exit from the current employer.
How to explain the agreementTypically, NCAs are implemented to defend the employer's confidential data, trade secrets, customer accounts, and other proprietary material from being exploited by competition.
In regards to this measure, it has experienced criticism due to its influence on employee profession prospects and the unrestricted market. Objectors hold that restricted mobility of qualified workers impeded creativity and competition, as they are precluded from expressing their expertise and knowledge to different firms in the same area.
Learn more about agreement on
https://brainly.com/question/14851869
#SPJ1
____ have led to a repuation of low quailty repsentation provide dby public defnders
Answers
Insufficient funding and heavy caseloads have led to a reputation of low-quality representation provided by public defenders.
The reputation of low-quality representation provided by public defenders stems from a combination of factors, primarily inadequate funding and overwhelming caseloads. Insufficient financial resources allocated to public defender offices result in staffing shortages, limited access to necessary resources, and inadequate training opportunities. As a consequence, public defenders may lack the necessary support and resources to effectively represent their clients, leading to perceptions of subpar representation.
Moreover, public defenders often face an overwhelming number of cases, which compromises their ability to provide thorough and personalized representation. Heavy caseloads leave little time for careful case review, investigation, and client consultations, hindering the development of strong defense strategies. With limited time and resources, public defenders may struggle to provide the level of attention and preparation required to mount an effective defense, further contributing to the reputation of low-quality representation.
Addressing the reputation of low-quality representation requires comprehensive reforms. Adequate funding must be allocated to public defender offices to ensure they can attract and retain highly skilled attorneys, provide necessary resources, and offer ongoing training opportunities. Additionally, measures to reduce caseloads are essential to allow public defenders to devote sufficient time and attention to each case, ensuring the provision of competent and effective legal representation to individuals who rely on public defenders for their defense. By addressing these underlying challenges, the reputation of low-quality representation can be gradually improved, ensuring that all individuals have access to fair and competent legal advocacy.
Learn more about Funding : brainly.com/question/29947443
#SPJ11
if a plaintiff seeking damages from a breach-of-contract action were to receive $1 in damages, the damages would most likely be classified as:
Answers
If a plaintiff seeking damages in a breach of contract action receives $1 in damages, the damages would most likely be classified as: nominal damages.
What is nominal damages?
A little sum of money given to a plaintiff whose legal rights were technically infringed but who hasn't proven they're entitled to compensatory damages because there wasn't any loss or harm in the process because there wasn't any.
Nominal damages are given in place of compensatory damages, which are meant to make up for harm, to mark the plaintiff's legal victory. In the vast majority of situations, nominal damages are set at one dollar; nevertheless, some jurisdictions maintain that nominal damages might change depending on the circumstances of the case.
To know more about nominal damages, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15852114
#SPJ4
What is the right to know the witnesses against oneself amendment ?
Answers
Answer: Criminal defendants have the right to a public trial without delay, a lawyer, an unbiased jury, and to know their accusers and the charges and evidence under the Sixth Amendment.
Explanation:
Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer
Answers
To resolve a conflict, parties should continue discussing issues until they find the one, perfect solution.
True or False
Answers
False. Resolving a conflict does not necessarily require finding the one, perfect solution through continuous discussion.
Conflict resolution recognizes that perfect solutions may be difficult to attain, and instead focuses on finding a resolution that satisfies the needs and interests of all parties involved. This may involve trade-offs and reaching a middle ground that allows for a fair and equitable outcome.
Continuously discussing issues without flexibility or willingness to compromise can hinder the resolution process and perpetuate the conflict. It is important to consider different perspectives, actively listen to each other, and explore alternative solutions that meet the underlying needs of all parties involved. Successful conflict resolution often requires a collaborative and constructive approach, rather than a quest for a singular perfect solution.
To learn more about conflict click here, brainly.com/question/32663176
#SPJ11
which of the below cases placed restrictions on the use of race-based peremptory challenges by counsel?
Answers
The case that placed restrictions on the use of race-based peremptory challenges by counsel is Batson v. Kentucky (1986).
In the United States, during jury selection in criminal trials, attorneys have a limited number of peremptory challenges that allow them to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason. However, the use of peremptory challenges based on race has been a subject of concern due to the potential for racial discrimination.
In the landmark case of Batson v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of race-based peremptory challenges. In this case, the defendant, James Batson, who was African American, challenged the prosecution's use of peremptory challenges to strike all potential African American jurors from the jury pool.
The Supreme Court ruled that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors based solely on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that such actions undermine the integrity of the jury selection process and perpetuate racial discrimination.
The Batson decision established a three-step process for evaluating claims of racial discrimination in jury selection:
The defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecution used peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors based on their race.
If the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the prosecution to provide a race-neutral explanation for the peremptory challenges.
Finally, the court must determine whether the defendant has proven purposeful racial discrimination based on the totality of the circumstances.
Batson v. Kentucky marked a significant milestone in protecting against racial discrimination in the jury selection process. It set a precedent that limited the use of race-based peremptory challenges and established a framework for courts to evaluate and address claims of racial bias.
It is important to note that subsequent cases, such as J.E.B. v. Alabama (1994) and Georgia v. McCollum (1992), extended the Batson principles to apply to gender-based peremptory challenges as well. These cases further emphasized the importance of fairness, impartiality, and equal protection in jury selection, regardless of race or gender.
In summary, Batson v. Kentucky is the case that placed restrictions on the use of race-based peremptory challenges by counsel. It established a framework for evaluating claims of racial discrimination in jury selection and provided important safeguards to protect against the unfair exclusion of potential jurors based on their race.
Learn more about restrictions here
https://brainly.com/question/30389332
#SPJ11
Which of the below cases placed restrictions on the use of race- based peremptory challenges by counsel?
Which of the following terms refer to a law that allows individuals to be prosecuted for an action that, when committed, was not a crime, but was outlawed afterwards?
Select one:
A. ex post facto law
B. habeas corpus law
C. appellate law
Answers
Answer:
It’s A
Explanation:
I got it correct on prepworks
Study the graph.
According to the data, which statement is true about Hispanic voters in 2020?
A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
A majority of male Hispanic voters favored Donald Trump over Joe Biden.
Hispanic voters with college degrees were less likely to vote for Joe Biden than those without college degrees.
Hispanic women over 50 were more likely to vote for Donald Trump than those aged 18–49.
Answers
Answer:
A majority of Hispanic Voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
Explanation:
While viewing the graph you see the majority of Hispanics (all) voted for Biden. Hopes this makes sense.
According to the data the true statement that is about the Hispanic voters in 2020 is that A majority of Hispanic voters of all ages favored Joe Biden over Donald Trump.
The answer to this question can be gotten from looking at this map. The blue voters refers to those that are voting for Joe Biden while the red voters are those that are in support of Donald Trump.
In all categories, Joe Biden was shown to have more percentage of Hispanic voters than Trump.
From the graph, we conclude that option A is the right answer to the question.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25723257?referrer=searchResults