Joseph Allen and his colleagues found that adolescents who were securely attached to their parents at 14 years of age were more likely at 21 years of age to report:

Answer:

so you can make money and have a good life

Explanation:

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

The two way left-turn lane is the lane that allows vehicle to take left turn. It is also known as the shared left turn lanes. This lane is used by vehicles to make left turns on a busy road to make left turns or U-turns.

The vehicle is not permitted to drive more than 200 feet on this shared lane,as it may cause clashes. The vehicles make left turns on the shared left-turn lanes with the opposing traffic.

Therefore, option A is correct.

Sometimes one need to turn left on a busy road that shares the left-turn lanes with opposing traffic.

A two way left-turn lane is a lane which allows vehicle to take left turnand also known as shared left turn lanes.

The left-turn lane are used by vehicles to make left turns on a busy road to make left turns or U-turns.

However, a vehicle is not permitted to drive more than 200 feet on this shared lane.

Hence, at times, one need to turn left on a busy road that shares the left-turn lanes with opposing traffic.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about this here

brainly.com/question/4616863

Answer:

EUMC reaped a substantial profit from its River-walk I investment.

Explanation:

Answer:  very expensive store

Explanation:

Answer:

Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.

Answer:

none, none, and they choose the canidates

Explanation:

Answer: Answer is below <3

Explanation: There are eight different kinds of fingerprint patterns, such as radiatal loop, ulnar loop, double loop, central pocket loop, plain arch, tented arch, plain whorl and accidental.

please give brainliest if I’m correct! Tyty <33

Answer:

I believe so

Explanation:

I have no clue I'm a high schooler who likes kpop and life revolves around sleeping 24/7

Answer:

a. One cannot leave

Explanation:

A total institution is one in which the daily lives of the individuals inside it is highly regimented and controlled. This is done in-order to follow a strict code of lifestyles and to ensure strict compliance of the laid down rules and regulations guiding the institution.

All the statements above are true except the " One cannot leave" which happens to be false. In total institution, one is free to join them as well as being total free to leave the institution. Example is the boarding schools.

Based on my analysis of available information, a perfect Global Center for Preparedness would need to have a comprehensive framework for identifying potential risks and responding to emergencies.

It would require state-of-the-art facilities and technologies, a highly trained and responsive workforce, and effective communication and coordination mechanisms.

The center would also need to be adaptable to evolving threats and have a strong focus on collaboration with international partners.

Additionally, it should prioritize research and development of new strategies and technologies to enhance preparedness and response capabilities

Read more about preparedness here:

https://brainly.com/question/29448773

#SPJ1

No, because Karen is required to first file the case in the appropriate trial court.

In order for an appellate court to hear a case, it must have gone through the trial court level first. Appellate courts do not initially decide issues such as whether a person has a claim and can act as a plaintiff. The trial court is the initial forum where such matters are addressed. Karen would need to file her case in the appropriate trial court and go through the necessary legal proceedings before it could potentially reach the appellate court.

The appellate court's role is primarily to review decisions made by lower courts, rather than initially deciding on the issues presented in a case.

To know more about appellate court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421

#SPJ11

Answer:

false because they need a test to see if they can be the right judge

Explanation:

pls give brainliest

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

Own definition for the criminal justice system:

the system of law enforcement that is directly involved in apprehending, prosecuting, defending, sentencing, and punishing those who are suspected or convicted of criminal offences.

what is the purpose of the criminal justice system?

It plays an important part in maintaining a just, peaceful and safe society. It does this by maintaining public safety, enforcing laws and protecting people's rights. Some key goals of the criminal justice system include: Preventing crime.

I hope it helps for the first part..

Answer:

Explanation:

An exchange rate is the value of a country's currency vs. that of another country or economic zone. Most exchange rates are free-floating and will rise or fall based on supply and demand in the market.

Answer:

the civil and crimal law.

Explanation:

Answer:

1.=The creation of jaywalking laws would be an example of the interactionist view in lawmaking .The interactionist view states that the definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power in a particular legal jurisdiction ,such as the auto industry .

Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Does the judicial system provide justice? Why or why not?

The question of whether the judicial system provides justice is complex and can vary depending on the context and perspective. While the judicial system aims to administer justice and uphold the rule of law, there are several factors that can impact its effectiveness:

a) Legal framework: The laws and regulations that form the basis of the judicial system play a crucial role in determining the level of justice provided. If the laws are flawed, biased, or unjust, it can hinder the system's ability to deliver justice.

b) Access to justice: The availability and accessibility of the judicial system to all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status, is crucial. If certain segments of society face barriers to accessing legal representation or face systemic biases, it can undermine the notion of equal justice for all.

c) Procedural fairness: The fairness of the legal procedures, including the right to a fair trial, unbiased judges, and the opportunity to present evidence, is fundamental to providing justice. Any deficiencies in these areas can undermine the perception of justice.

d) Human fallibility: The judicial system is operated by individuals who are prone to biases, errors, and limitations. Mistakes can occur in the interpretation of the law or the weighing of evidence, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.

e) Systemic issues: Some argue that systemic issues such as racial or socioeconomic biases exist within the judicial system, leading to unequal treatment or disparities in outcomes. These concerns raise questions about the system's ability to consistently provide justice.

While the judicial system strives to provide justice, its effectiveness can be influenced by the factors mentioned above. Ongoing efforts are needed to address these challenges and improve the fairness and accessibility of the system.

2. What might be another option instead of the current judicial system?

There are various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods that can be considered as alternatives or complements to the traditional judicial system. These methods aim to resolve conflicts and provide justice in a more efficient, collaborative, and less adversarial manner. Some potential alternatives include:

a) Mediation: In mediation, a neutral third party facilitates discussions between the parties involved in a dispute, helping them reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Mediation focuses on finding common ground and encourages communication and cooperation.

b) Arbitration: Arbitration involves the parties presenting their case to an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators who make a binding decision. It is less formal and more streamlined than a court trial, providing a quicker resolution.

c) Restorative justice: Restorative justice emphasizes repairing the harm caused by an offense by involving the victim, the offender, and the community. It seeks to promote healing, accountability, and reintegration, focusing on rehabilitation rather than punishment.

d) Community courts: Community courts operate at a local level and aim to address underlying issues within a community while providing justice. They emphasize problem-solving approaches, rehabilitation, and community involvement.

e) Online dispute resolution (ODR): ODR platforms leverage technology to facilitate the resolution of disputes online. It can provide a convenient and accessible means for parties to reach a resolution without the need for physical court appearances.

These alternative options focus on different principles and methodologies compared to the traditional judicial system, providing flexibility, efficiency, and increased participation from the parties involved. However, the suitability of these alternatives can vary depending on the nature of the dispute, the legal framework, and the cultural context in which they are implemented.

The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.

People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.

Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.

Learn more about hostilities, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30331571

#SPJ4

Tort law and criminal law are two different areas of law that have differences in terms of their purpose, burden of proof, penalties, and parties involved.

Tort law is concerned with cases of civil wrongs that cause injury or harm to an individual or their property. It is the legal area where one person causes harm or damage to another person's person, property, or reputation.  A plaintiff, who is the person claiming damages, seeks compensation for their injuries from the defendant, who is the person alleged to have caused the harm or damage. The objective of tort law is to provide financial compensation to an injured party to compensate for damages incurred. Tort law does not involve criminal sanctions, such as jail time or fines.

In contrast, criminal law deals with cases that involve a violation of public law. The primary objective of criminal law is to protect society by preventing criminal activities, punishing offenders, and rehabilitating them. Criminal law is concerned with the punishment of committed crime against the public rather than individuals. The burden of proof is higher in criminal law than in tort law. In criminal law, the prosecutor has to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, while in tort law, the plaintiff has to prove the defendant's negligence by a preponderance of the evidence. The penalties for criminal offenses are also more severe than those for tort law offenses. A criminal conviction may lead to imprisonment or other forms of punishment, while tort law only involves financial compensation to the plaintiff. In conclusion, while both tort law and criminal law deal with the breach of a legal duty, they differ in their purpose, burden of proof, penalties, and parties involved.

To know more about  tort law and criminal law :

https://brainly.com/question/22734459

#SPJ11

During the Primary and caucus season of presidential elections, candidates are officially identified. This stage involves a series of state primaries and caucuses where voters select their preferred candidate for each party, leading to the nomination of each party's official candidate.

The candidates are officially identified during the Primary and Caucus season of the presidential elections. This is the time when political parties hold a series of elections in each state to determine their respective nominees for the general election. During this season, voters have the opportunity to select their preferred candidate, and the winner of each state's primary or caucus earns delegates who will vote for them at the party's national convention. It is during this process that the field of candidates is narrowed down until a clear nominee emerges.

To learn more about Caucus, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29545667

#SPJ11

Gardner has given the charity a fee simple defeasible. The correct option to this question is B.

In this situation, Gardner has deeded the land to Homes for the Homeless with a specific condition mentioned in the deed - "as long as it provides shelter for those without."

This means that the charity has the ownership of the land as long as they meet this condition. If the condition is not met or is violated, the ownership may revert back to Gardner or another designated party.
Based on the information provided and the specific terms of the deed, the correct answer is that Gardner has given Homes for the Homeless a fee simple defeasible.

For more information on charity kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/29818302

#SPJ11

Answer:

judices

Explanation:

I learned it in middle school

Answer:

Pretty sure its B. Sorry if I'm wrong.

Explanation:

This is the definition on Wikipedia.

"Right to know", in the context of United States workplace and community environmental law, is the legal principle that the individual has the right to know the chemicals to which they may be exposed in their daily living.

Answer:

B. Laws that do not come from the Constitution.