Answer:
Yes, it is against the law. It is called Falsifying documents, and it is a felony crime.
Explanation:
How are members of house committees determined?
Explanation:
Each of the committee is determined at the beginning of the Congress
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of _____.
600 officers
16 sworn officers who split their time between campuses
6 sworn officers and 66 civilian guards
over 60 sworn officers
The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.
The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.
The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.
To know more about University of California here
https://brainly.com/question/16551247
#SPJ1
When were all white men able to vote?
The 15th Amendment, which was enacted in 1870, gave males of all races the ability to vote. African Americans received citizenship rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution (1868). The capacity to vote was not always a result of this, though.
Anyone born in the country or who acquired citizenship was given citizenship and equal civil and legal rights under the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. African Americans and former slaves who had been set free after the American Civil War were included in this. One of the fundamental tenets of our democracy is that anyone born in the United States is automatically a citizen of the United States. It embodies America's core commitment to fairness and is reflected in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. sexual behaviour" The Court concluded based on the Fourteenth Amendment's provision of due process: "The petitioners have the right to have their privacy respected. By declaring their private sexual behaviour illegal, the State cannot diminish their existence or dictate how they will live. Birthright citizenship was established, "due process" and "equal protection" under the law were mandated, and the federal government was given the responsibility of maintaining freedom. Race and ethnicity were eliminated from the legal concept of "American identity " Every day, we all experience the effects of the 14th Amendment.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ4
Wairimu aged 17 years entered into an agreement with Patel in which Wairimu agreed to supply Patel with old Jerry cans for recycling. Patel gave Wairimu 50000 and Wairimu supplied cans worth 20000 and has failed to supply the balance. Patel is aggrieved and seeks your legal advice. What should Patel do?
Answer:
12
Explanation:
cuz
which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
A) The nonresident has traveled through the state on many occasions
B) In the past, the nonresident had sexual intercourse in the state and the child may have been conceived by that act.
C) In the past, the nonresident resided with the child in the state
D) The nonresident is personally served within the state
Answer:
a
Explanation: it makes sense
health care compliance plans should be focused on _____ A. maintaining profits B. preventable medical errors C. decreasing paperwork D. increasing diversity
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
B. preventable medical errorsExplanation:I just took the test
Is there any restriction that applies to computer games advocating the doing of a terrorist act in Australia? 1. Australian law protects such cases as a form of freedom of speech/expression. 2. Such games may not be sold publicly but distribution for private use is allowed. 3. Such games may not be sold or provided online. 4. Such games may not be screened. 5. Options 2 and 4 above 6. Options 3 and 4 above 7. Options 1 and 2 above 8. None of the above
Computer games that encourage carrying out terrorist acts are subject to a ban on public sale in Australia, however private usage of such games is permitted. Describe terrorism. A crime or an action that intentionally spreads fear, usually by violence against people or property, is referred to as terrorism. Terrorist acts are carried out to advance a specific political philosophy or cause. Terrorists include anyone or any group of people who carry out terrorist acts. Australian legislation on terrorism-promoting video games. Australian law prohibits the sale of video games that encourage the commission of terrorist acts. On the other hand, private use distribution is allowed. However, such games may not be sold or provided online, nor may they be screened.
Therefore, Option (2) and (4) above is the correct answer. Option (1) is incorrect since Australian law does not protect computer games that advocate terrorism as a form of freedom of speech/expression. In Australia, advocating a terrorist act is a crime. As a result, computer games that promote terrorism are not regarded as protected speech or expression. Option (3) is also incorrect since Australian law does not allow for the online sale or provision of computer games that advocate for the commission of a terrorist act.
Know about the rights enjoyed by Australian citizens:
https://brainly.com/question/14184036
#SPJ11
which legal tool is used when the mental health patient is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care?
When a mental health patient is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care, the legal tool that is used is called a healthcare proxy.
A healthcare proxy is a legal tool that is used when a person is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care. It is a legal document that enables an individual to appoint another person to make healthcare decisions for them when they are unable to do so themselves. A healthcare proxy is important for individuals who are incapacitated due to mental health issues or physical disabilities. It is also important for individuals who are facing the end of life and want to ensure that their wishes are respected regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care.
Learn more about healthcare proxy here:
https://brainly.com/question/7742017
#SPJ11
the constitution provides a basis for a right to privacy. True/False ?
The constitution provides a basis for a right to privacy. - True
Justice Louis D. Brandeis argued in his opinion in Gilbert v. Minnesota (1920) that the First Amendment protected a person's right to privacy in their own home despite the fact that the United States Constitution does not specifically mention privacy.
The Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy is a basic right and that it is derived from other fundamental rights protected by the constitution, such as the right to life and the right to personal liberty. The Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments have all been interpreted by the courts to build a foundation for such a right, despite the fact that the right to privacy is not expressly stated in the Constitution.
Read more about Constitution on:
brainly.com/question/21235714
#SPJ4
The Hospital Corporation of America, founded by the family of Bill Frist (Republican, Tenn.), former U. S. Senate Majority Leader, and the country's largest for profit hospital chain, settled fraud charges with the U. S. Justice Department. Read the article at: https://www.laweekly.com/the-bad-doctor/ (Links to an external site.)
Does the LA Weekly article appear to be biased, or does it seem to accurately report HCA's fraud? Explain your answer.
The LA Weekly article does not appear to be biased. From the content of the article, it appears to accurately report on HCA's fraud.
The article outlines specific cases in which HCA and its affiliates were accused of fraud, such as overbilling Medicaid and Medicare, billing for unnecessary services, and operating physician practices to overbill government health care programs.
The article also states that HCA agreed to pay a total of $2.5 billion in criminal and civil fines to resolve the fraud charges. The article even provides a quote from the Department of Justice responding to the settlement. These facts all support a conclusion that the LA Weekly article is accurately reporting HCA's fraud.
To know more about HCA , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18369452
#SPJ4
What was President Wilson's opinion in the Treaty of Versailles?
President Wilson's opinion in the Treaty of Versailles was a mix of support and disappointment.
He believed that the treaty was necessary to prevent future conflicts, but he also had reservations about its harshness towards Germany. Wilson strongly advocated for his Fourteen Points, which aimed to establish peace and self-determination for all nations.
However, many of these points were not fully incorporated into the final treaty. Wilson was particularly disappointed with the heavy reparations imposed on Germany and the loss of German territories. He also opposed the creation of the League of Nations without the United States being fully committed.
Despite his efforts, the treaty was ratified without significant changes, leading to ongoing tensions and contributing to the start of World War II.
Learn more about Treaty of Versailles https://brainly.com/question/1359438
#SPJ11
Which crime is classified as a misdemeanor?
O assault
O burglary
O murder
O speeding
The crime is classified as a misdemeanor is called speeding. Thus the correct option is D.
What is a misdemeanor?Though less harmful than murders, misdemeanors typically carry a greater degree of imprisonment. The penalty for a misdemeanor is a fine, imprisonment, or up to a year in a county or regional jail.
The threat or performance level of such an act, as well as the act of causing physical harm or unintentional contact with a person, may all fall under the legal definition of an assault regardless of the crime's level of seriousness.
Shoplifting, vandalism, drinking in public, and property crimes are examples of common crimes. Certain offenses may fall under the misdemeanor or felony categories, depending on the state.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about misdemeanors, here:
brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ7
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least _____.
Answer:
1) They need to be at least 23 yet under 37
2) A four year minimum degree from an american college/university
3) valid driver’s license
4) must be a US citizen
5) must have completed at least two years of professional work experience, or one year for those that hold a master’s or higher degree.
6) must comply with the FBI Drug Policy and meet the physical fitness standards described below.
7) must be able to be cleared for Top Secret SCI (Secure Compartmentalized Information).
Answer:
A bachelors degree
Explanation:
A writing sample that has been made to look like someone else's handwriting is a:
Answer:
cursive
Explanation:
Edward Hanousek worked for Pacific and Arctic Railway and Navigation Company (P&A) as a roadmaster of the White Pass & Yukon Railroad in Alaska. Hanousek was responsible "for every detail of the safe and efficient maintenance and construction of track, structures and marine facilities of the entire railroad," including special projects. One project was a rock quarry, known as "6-mile," above the Skagway River. Next to the quarry, and just beneath the surface, ran a high-pressure oil pipeline owned by Pacific and Arctic Pipeline, Inc. P&A's sister company. When the quarry's backhoe operator punctured the pipeline, an estimated 1,000-5,000 gallons of oil were discharged into the river. Hanousek was charged with negligently discharging a harmful quantity of oil into a navigable water of the United States in violation of the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.
1. Did Hanousek have the required mental state (mens rea) to be convicted of a crime? Why or why not?
2. Which theory discussed in the chapter would enable a court to hold Hanousek criminally liable for violating the statute regardless of whether he participated in, directed, or even knew about the specific violation?
3. Could the backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline also be charged with a crime in this situation? Explain.
4. Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he should not be convicted because he was not aware of the requirements of the SWA. Would this defense be successful? Why or why not?
1. In order to be convicted of a crime, Hanousek must have had the required mental state (mens rea).
2. The theory of strict liability, discussed in the chapter, would enable a court to hold Hanousek criminally liable for violating the statute regardless of his knowledge or participation in the specific violation.
3. The backhoe operator who punctured the pipeline could also potentially be charged with a crime in this situation.
4. Hanousek's defense that he was not aware of the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) would likely not be successful.
1. The chapter does not provide specific information regarding Hanousek's mental state or intent in relation to the oil discharge. It would depend on the evidence presented in the case to determine whether he had the necessary mental state, such as whether he acted knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence.
2. Strict liability offenses impose liability without requiring proof of intent or knowledge. If the statute under the Clean Water Act imposes strict liability for the discharge of oil into navigable waters, Hanousek could be held criminally liable even if he was not directly involved or aware of the pipeline puncture.
3. If the operator acted negligently or recklessly, causing the oil discharge into the river, they could be held responsible for violating the criminal provisions of the Clean Water Act. However, it would depend on the specific circumstances and evidence of the operator's actions and mental state.
4. Ignorance of the law is generally not a valid defense in criminal cases. The CWA is a federal statute with established regulations, and individuals are expected to be aware of their legal obligations. Hanousek's lack of awareness of the CWA's requirements would not absolve him of potential liability unless there were specific circumstances or legal arguments that could support a defense based on lack of knowledge or mistake of law, which would require further analysis of the case specifics.
Learn more about Negligence
https://brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
Outline Uniform Commercial Code. The Uniform Commercial Code is a comprehensive set of laws governing all commercial transactions in the United States.
"If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any term of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the courts may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result."
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a comprehensive set of laws that governs commercial transactions in the United States. It was established to bring uniformity and consistency to commercial practices across different states. The UCC covers various aspects of commercial transactions, including the sale of goods, leases, negotiable instruments, secured transactions, and more.
The UCC was drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute (ALI). It was first published in 1952 and has been subsequently adopted, with some modifications, by all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories.
The UCC is not a federal law, but rather a model statute that each state can choose to adopt. However, most states have enacted the UCC in whole or in part, resulting in a considerable degree of uniformity in commercial laws throughout the country. The UCC provides a consistent legal framework for conducting business transactions and resolving disputes, promoting efficiency and predictability in commercial dealings.
To know more about Uniform Commercial Code refer here
brainly.com/question/30869012
#SPJ11
Complete Question : Outline Uniform Commercial Code. The Uniform Commercial Code is a comprehensive set of laws governing all commercial transactions in the United States.
"If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any term of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the courts may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result." Identify the statute or law that establishes the Uniform Commercial Code.
Which of the following statements about government policy and unemployment are true?
(Select all that apply. Hint: There are two correct answers.)
A. Average unemployment benefits are equal to about one-half of the wage that the person earned in his or her previous job.
B. The federal government requires tax collection on the first $7,000 in wages paid to each worker.
C. An individual has to collect unemployment benefits to be classified as unemployed.
D. The funding for unemployment insurance is a federal tax collected from employers.
The following statements about government policy and unemployment are true The federal government requires tax collection on the first $7,000 in wages paid to each worker.
What impact does unemployment have on the government?Both the federal government's ability to collect revenue and economic activity are negatively impacted by unemployment. Less people are taxing the government when unemployment is high. Yet, unemployment also means that fewer people have extra money to spend on goods and services.
What could make you ineligible for unemployment benefits in Texas?If you were fired for an issue other than wrongdoing, you can be qualified for benefits. Instances of misconduct that could result in you losing your eligibility include breaking corporate rules, breaking the law, failing to properly manage your position, or failing to complete your work when you are capable of doing so.
To Know more about corporate rules,
https://brainly.com/question/7283950
#SPJ1
As a consultant for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, you have been hired to complete a site selection report. The Y is currently looking at 3 different locations and they have asked you to prioritize them. Discuss, in detail, the steps (discussed in your textbook) that you would take to complete this report. Use relevant examples form the Edmond area.
To complete the site selection report for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, I would follow several steps outlined in the textbook. These steps include conducting a feasibility study, analyzing the site characteristics, assessing community needs, and evaluating potential risks and benefits.
Feasibility Study: I would begin by conducting a feasibility study for each location under consideration. This study would involve analyzing factors such as demographics, market demand, competition, and economic indicators. For example, I would examine the population growth rate in the Edmond area, income levels, and trends in health and fitness participation.
Site Characteristics: Next, I would analyze the specific characteristics of each location. This would include evaluating factors such as size, accessibility, visibility, zoning regulations, infrastructure, and proximity to amenities. For instance, I would assess the available parking space, the ease of transportation access, and the visibility of each location from major roads.
Community Needs: It is crucial to assess the community's needs to ensure the YMCA can effectively serve the target population. This would involve conducting surveys, interviews, or focus groups with residents to gather information on their preferences and expectations. Additionally, I would research existing community facilities and programs to identify any gaps or opportunities for the YMCA to address.
Risk and Benefit Analysis: To evaluate potential risks and benefits, I would consider factors like operational costs, revenue potential, environmental impact, and potential partnerships. For example, I would assess the cost of acquiring or leasing each location, ongoing maintenance expenses, and the revenue-generating potential through membership fees or program offerings. Additionally, I would evaluate the potential for collaborations with schools, healthcare providers, or local businesses.
By following these steps, the site selection report would provide a comprehensive analysis of each location's suitability for the YMCA in Edmond. It would prioritize the locations based on their alignment with the community's needs, financial viability, and overall potential for success.
For more questions on feasibility study
https://brainly.com/question/30985089
#SPJ8
5. Police became aware of the crawl space because of a
coming from the air vents.
John Wayne facts
Answer:
Assuming this is about John Wayne Gacy, the police became aware of the crawlspace because of a foul odor coming from the air vents.
Which of the following statements are true in relation to GDPR select all that apply
Organizations are required to upgrade policies and procedures so that data is protected the following statements are true in relation to General Data Protection Regulation GDPR. The correct option is 3.
The GDPR requires organizations to update their policies and procedures to ensure data protection. The rule lays out a number of requirements for organizations, among them taking the proper organizational and technical steps to protect the security of personal data. Protection against data breaches and unauthorized access could entail updating policies, procedures, and security measures.
Thus, the ideal selection is option 3.
Learn more about General Data Protection Regulation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30395765
#SPJ1
Your Question seems incomplete most probably your complete question was:
Which of the following statements are true in relation to the gdpr?
1 if an organization doesn't charge for goods or services, they don't need to comply.
2 every organization is required to have a data protection officer.
3. organization are required to upgrade policies and procedures so that data is protected
Which factor is a reason for persistent delinquent behavior according to life course theory?
A stable marriage
A permanent residence
Unemployment
Good upbringing
What are the concerns over money for bail? Do you have these concerns? Why or why not?
Do you support any alternate programs? How does protecting victims play into these programs?
Answer:
One concern over money for bail is that it can create a two-tiered system of justice, where those who can afford to pay for bail can get out of jail while awaiting trial, while those who cannot afford to pay for bail remain in jail. This can lead to unequal treatment and outcomes for defendants based on their financial status. Another concern is that bail can be used as a tool to keep defendants in jail even if they are not a flight risk or pose a danger to the community, simply because they cannot afford to pay for bail.
I do have these concerns. I support alternate programs such as pretrial release or supervision, where defendants are released from jail but monitored by pretrial services staff or a court officer. I believe these programs can protect victims by ensuring that defendants are not released if they are a danger to the community or are likely to flee.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
3. How can it be said that courts adjudicate the allocation of the costs of a consumer-oriented economy?
Answer:
It can be said that the courts assess the consumer profile and consumption pattern in a region, determining which sectors will receive more subsidies to reduce expenses, but increase the production of goods and services, optimizing the regional economy.
Explanation:
A consumer-oriented economy is one that is oriented and driven by consumer spending. Therefore, regions that have this type of economy should study and analyze the consumer profile that citizens have, evaluating the goods and services that are most consumed and that are sustaining this economy more efficiently. Thus, the allocation of expenditures should be determined by the courts in that region, based on the sectors that are most in line with the consumer's profile, being the most profitable sectors and the ones that should be more stimulated.
best way to write a letter for Long-Term disability appeal
The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.
What is a long-term disability appeal?Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.
While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.
Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27571970
#SPJ1
Stress is a natural component of police work. However, some stressors in police work are particularly destructive. List and define three areas of stress that affect police officers and identify methods that may be used to reduce stress among police officers.
The areas of stress that may have to affect the work of policemen would be:
Issues with the administrationLong hours and strenuous dutyMedical issues.What is stress?This is the term that is used to refer to the emotional feeling that is caused by the tension that a person would feel. The stress that they feel would make them to react in ways that may show their displeasure and frustration at given events.
The ways that the stress that the police officers feel can be reduced is when they are let to have fewer hours of work on the field. We know that the work that they do is stressful enough.
When they are adequately compensated and let to have vacation and off days. This would help them to regain their strength.
Also giving them the ability to have enough medical attention that they need is also a way to help the police officers.
Read more on stress here: https://brainly.com/question/11819849
#SPJ1
A face lift: _____________________________ (use word parts)
Rhytidectomy, sometimes known as a facelift, is a surgical operation that comprises the removal of extra facial fat, tightening of facial muscles, and cutting or redraping of facial skin to simulate a smoother, tighter facial look.
How long does it take for a facelift to wear off?A facelift may make your face and neck seem younger. However, the effects of a facelift are not permanent. The skin on the face may begin to droop again as we age. In general, a face-lift should last 10 years.
What exactly happens during a face lift?Incisions for a classic facelift often begin in the hairline at the temples, extend around the ear, and conclude in the lower scalp.
Fat can be sculpted or redistributed from the face, jowls, and neck, and underlying tissue is moved; the deeper layers of the face and muscles are frequently raised.
Learn more about facelift:
https://brainly.com/question/14774630
#SPJ1
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.