Answers
In the 1980s, numerous institutions of higher learning implemented stricter requirements for admission, including SAT scores.
Standardized examinations like the SAT are regularly used in the US to determine admission to colleges. The name and scoring of the Scholastic Aptitude Test have changed a number of times since it was first introduced in 1926. The Scholastic Assessment Test was its original name, and it later went by the names SAT I: Reasoning Test, SAT Reasoning Test, and finally just the SAT.
The SAT was developed and published by the College Board, a private, non-profit organization in the United States. The Educational Testing Service administers the SAT on behalf of the College Board, having previously also created it. The test's goal is to determine if students are college-ready. The SAT was initially intended to be independent of high school courses.
To learn more about SAT scores please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14274404
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which of the following includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards?
a. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
b. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
c. The Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 123 R
d. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Answers
The following option that includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive political party compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards is d.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a federal law that was implemented by Congress in 2010 in response to the global financial crisis of 2008. The law consists of 16 sections, each of which seeks to enhance the transparency and accountability of financial markets, minimize systemic risk, and enhance consumer protection. It is one of the most significant financial regulatory reforms in the United States since the Great Depression.The Dodd-Frank Act contains many provisions, including executive compensation clawback rules, which require publicly traded firms to recover executive compensation that was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards. The Act also contains provisions that seek to strengthen the U.S. financial system's transparency and accountability.
Learn more about political party here:
https://brainly.com/question/30901480
#SPJ11
the discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the: group of answer choices judge to have a chance to review the arguments before they make them before the jury parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the judge, who discovers the truth parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the jury, so it can discover the truth all of the other choices are correct
Answers
The correct answer is C, The discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts."
The discovery stage refers to the initial phase of a project or process, where the focus is on gathering information, conducting research, and exploring potential opportunities or solutions. It is a crucial step that lays the foundation for the entire project, helping to identify objectives, constraints, and risks.
During the discovery stage, teams engage in activities such as market analysis, customer research, and competitor assessments. They aim to understand the problem or need they are addressing, define project goals, and gain insights into the target audience. This stage often involves brainstorming sessions, interviews, surveys, and data analysis to uncover valuable information.
To know more about Discovery stage refer to-
brainly.com/question/28390799
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
The discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the: group of answer choices
A). Judges to have a chance to review the arguments before they make them before the jury.
B). Parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the judge, who discovers the truth.
C). Parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts.
D). Parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the jury, so it can discover the truth all of the other choices are correct
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
Answers
the u.s. foreign policy illustrated in this cartoon was intended to
Answers
By looking at the image given below, it may be stated that the U.S. Foreign Policy illustrated in the cartoon in order to prevent further European colonization in the west hemisphere. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The European colonization has been ideally seen among the most hot issues of the past few centuries, especially because of the significant events that took place as a result. In a response to the same, a cartoon, as portrayed in the image, was used to indicate that the Europeans must stop colonizing further in the Western Hemisphere.
Learn more about European colonization here:
https://brainly.com/question/12624227
#SPJ4
Missing options and image are added below.
A. prevent further European colonization in the Western Hemisphere
B. deter Spain from inciting revolution in former U.S. colonies
C. encourage European powers to invest in Latin America
D. keep the war between France and Spain from spreading to Latin America
If a train of freight cars, each 10 meters long, rolls by you at the rate of three cars each second.
What is the frequency of the train cars and the velocity?
Answers
Answer:
30 m/s. speed = distance / time.
Explanation:
wavelength of a longitudinal wave is the distance between successive compressions or equivalently the distance between successive rarefactions. 30 m/s. speed = distance / time.
The outside wall of the Town Court has a mural of the American flag, Twin Towers, and screeching bald eagle painted on it by members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. One night, Russ Toleum spray paints a message over every aspect of the mural. The message is, “Canada – like America but Better, Eh.” The security cameras on the property clearly pick up Russ’s face and he is charged with defacing public property. Russ claims he was merely adding to the mural that was already there and that his right to free speech has been violated. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answers
Answer:
It is a crime to deface public property, because it isn't yours personally. How would Russ like it if someone spray painted something offensive on his car? They were just expressing free speech! "Free Speech" Is not an excuse to commit a crime, Free Speech is just the liberty of saying what you want whether it's controversial or not.
Explanation:
What was the situation in Rome during the times Sallust is describing?
Answers
Answer:
The political, and moral decline of Rome
Explanation:
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
You are charged with a crime in a very small, isolated town. You hire one of the two attorneys in town to defend you (the other one is his brother, the prosecutor). You ask for a jury trial, and they bring in four people to decide your fate. Are these four a legitimate jury?
Answers
In the given case, when an individual wants a jury trial, they summon four individuals to decide the destiny, these four are not a legitimate jury, as the jury should consist of six to twelve persons.
What is the significance of legitimate jury?The defense of debtor-defendants, defeating foolish legislation, upholding the rights of private persons in legal disputes with the government, and safeguarding litigants from overbearing and repressive judges were some of the justifications put out for civil jury trials.
Almost all juries are able to come to a unanimous decision. In some sorts of situations, it is a verdict that receives the support of 11 out of 12 jurors is admissible. A hung jury is one that cannot reach a consensus after the jury has deliberated or considered for numerous hours or days.
To learn more about the legitimate jury, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ2
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
Answers
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
Mr. Hudson, isn't it true that you first meet June
Harris on April 14, 1981, is an example of what
kind of question?
Answers
You are a prosecutor and are preparing for an upcoming trial. This is a case of arson, and the defendant is accused of setting fire to a barn, causing it to burn to the ground. You have an abundance of physical evidence that points to the defendant, but you also discover that a set of shoeprints found at the scene matches another suspect. This would be an example of what type of evidence?
Answers
Hope to help :)
Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.
What is evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.
In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.
Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
In recent years, local government entities have filed lawsuits against oil companies to hold them responsible for the public costs of climate change under the theory of public nuisance. Marin and San Mateo Counties brought a case in 2017. These cases are still pending in the courts today.
What is your opinion regarding using the courts and the legal claim of public nuisance to hold oil companies responsible for public costs of climate change?
Answers
Answer:
jsnndnejz
I need points so don't listen to me
Less than _____% of all bills introduced become law
Answers
If a judge bases his or her final decision on existing law, it is an example of common law; what is the decision called that a judge arrives at from a case with unique circumstances?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.
Penalties for your first DUI conviction include_____.
Answers
What are the 3 levels of
government?
Answers
Answer:
executive, legislative, and judicial.
the phrase "…but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attained" forbids two more aspects of treason. any ideas?
Answers
1) The only ways to commit treason against the United States are to declare war on them or to support and comfort their enemies. 2) The Congress shall have the authority to establish the treasonous offense's punishment, but no attainder of treason shall result in the corruption of blood or in forfeiture other than while the attained person is still alive.
A person or organization in a position of authority may engage in corruption, a kind of dishonesty or a criminal conduct, in order to receive illicit benefits or abuse power for one's own gain. Corruption can involve a variety of actions, such as bribery, buying influence, embezzlement, and other actions that are lawful in many nations. When a government official or other officeholder uses their position for personal benefit, political corruption develops. Kleptocracies, oligarchies, narco-states, and mafia states all have high rates of corruption. Crime and corruption are endemic sociological phenomena that occur frequently and in varied degrees in almost every nation on a worldwide scale. Each country allocates domestic resources for the prevention of crime, the policing of corruption, and the control and regulation of corruption. The general term "anti-corruption" is frequently used to describe tactics used to combat corruption. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 and other international programs also have a specific objective that is designed to significantly reduce corruption in all of its forms.
Learn more about corruption here
https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ4
Which factors summarize how people change their attitudes?
• A. Message receiver, characteristics of the message, characteristics of the target
• B. Message source, characteristics of the message, characteristics of the
environment
O C. Message source, characteristics of the message, characteristics of the target
• D. Message tone, characteristics of the message, characteristics of the target
Answers
____ is a law or constitutional amendment proposed and passed by the voters and subject to review by the state courts; also called a proposition
Answers
Answer:
The term to fill in the blank is likely "ballot Initiative"
Explanation:
A ballot initiative is a law or constitutional amendment that is proposed and passed directly by the voters through a voting process. It bypasses the regular legislative procedures and allows citizens to propose and enact new laws or amend existing ones. Once a ballot initiative is approved by the voters, it is subject to review by the state courts to ensure its constitutionality and compliance with other legal requirements. In some regions, a ballot initiative may also be referred to as a proposition, especially during the voting process.
Initiative is a law or constitutional amendment proposed and passed by the voters and subject to review by the state courts. It is also commonly referred to as a proposition.
An amendment refers to a formal change or addition made to a document, law, or constitution. It is a process through which modifications are made to existing legislation or foundational documents to address new circumstances, correct deficiencies, or introduce improvements. Amendments are often enacted to ensure that laws remain relevant and adaptable over time.
In the context of a constitution, amendments are typically made to update or expand the rights and protections granted to individuals or to modify the structure and powers of the government. They go through a defined process, which usually involves proposing the amendment, gathering support or ratification from relevant bodies.
To learn more about Amendment visit here:
brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
the texas constitution reflects each of the following principles except: executive dominance republican responsiveness separation of powers limited government
Answers
The Texas Constitution reflects each of the following principles except: executive dominance.
The Texas Constitution is the supreme law of the state of Texas, outlining the structure and function of the state's government. It reflects several principles, including republican responsiveness, separation of powers, and limited government. Republican responsiveness refers to the idea that elected officials should be accountable to the people they serve. Separation of powers is the principle that different branches of government should have distinct functions and responsibilities. Limited government is the idea that government power should be restricted to prevent abuse or infringement of individual rights. However, the Texas Constitution does not reflect the principle of executive dominance, which refers to the idea that the executive branch should have significant power over the legislative and judicial branches. In fact, the Texas Constitution establishes a relatively weak governorship, with limited powers compared to other states.
To learn more about Texas Constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27962072
#SPJ11
Read the following scenario and answer the question that follows: Two men have been murdered in a drive-by shooting in Mitchells Plain, Cape Town, in what is believed to be a gang hit. The suspects scene but were later arrested and charged with murder. Police confirmed that the accused, Gerwin Morris and Warren Davies, are me Junky Funky gang, one of the notorious gangs on the Cape Flats. Since they fled the scene of the crime, they were denied bail. You ar attorney and must answer several questions asked by their family members. Gerwin's grandmother is heart-broken and wants to know whether her grandson will be punished with the death penalty. You comfor telling her that the death penalty no longer exists in South Africa. Which divisions of South African public law will you use to prove to Gerwin's grandmother that the death penalty is an unconstit of punishment in terms of South African law? common law and criminal law constitutional law and criminal law civil law and criminal law criminal law and case law
Answers
The divisions of South African public law to be used to confirm that the death penalty is an unconstitutional form of punishment in South Africa are constitutional law and criminal law. The Constitution, under Section 11 of the Bill of Rights, abolished the death penalty, while criminal law states the punishments for different crimes.
Explanation:To assure Gerwin's grandmother that her grandson won't be receiving the death penalty, we would use both constitutional law and criminal law. Constitutional law in South Africa, under Section 11 of the Bill of Rights in Chapter 2 of the Constitution, states that 'Everyone has the right to life'. This effectively abolished the death penalty in the country. Thus, according to constitutional law, the death penalty cannot be applied even in severe criminal cases. Meanwhile, criminal law sets the type of punishments that can be handed down for different crimes, including murder. Confirming this information, one could offer Gerwin’s grandmother some peace of mind about the potential outcomes of her grandson's case.
Learn more about Death Penalty in South Africa here:https://brainly.com/question/33471800
#SPJ2
the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says.
Answers
The Bible verse "the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says" is found in 1 Corinthians 14:34. This passage has been interpreted in different ways, and there are different views on what it means.
One interpretation is that women should not speak in church at all, and that they should remain silent and only listen to the men. This interpretation is based on the idea that women are inferior to men and should submit to them.
However, this view is not universally accepted, and there are other interpretations of this passage. Some scholars believe that this verse is referring to a specific situation in the Corinthian church, where some women were disrupting the church services by asking questions and making noise.
According to this view, Paul was not saying that women should never speak in church, but rather that they should be respectful and not disrupt the worship services. This interpretation is supported by the fact that in other parts of the New Testament, women are described as active participants in the early Christian communities.
In conclusion, the passage "the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says" has been interpreted in different ways. While some interpret it to mean that women should not speak in church at all, others believe that it refers to a specific situation in the Corinthian church, where some women were disrupting the services.
Learn more about Bible
https://brainly.com/question/30132943
#SPJ11
If checking accounts are not as profitable as savings accounts, why do banks offer them?
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
Ο Α. .
Customers need ways to access their money more easily than going to the bank to withdraw it.
OB.
The federal government mandates that banks offer checking accounts to their clients.
C.
Banks make money on fees they charge if you write a check for more money than you have in the account.
OD
Banks make money on the fees they charge stores for the convenience of accepting checks.
Answers
Answer:
1st option is the correct amswer....
What form of restitution is used to repay society as a whole?
Answers
If you face a violation of your equal rights as a woman in the United States, your lawyer might draw on which of the following to support
your case?
a. Equal Rights Amendment
b. 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
c. Equal Rights Amendment
d. The 19th Amendment
Answers
If your equal rights as a woman in the United States are violated, then your lawyer would be able to draw upon the b. 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause).
What is the Equal Protection Clause ?The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause.
The well-known slogan "Equal Justice Under Law" is based on the Equal Protection Clause, which has been the subject of much dispute. The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which assisted in ending racial segregation, was founded on this clause. In addition, the provision served as the foundation for Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex unions and many other rulings that rejected prejudice and intolerance toward members of different groups.
The 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause contains the moral principle that no one should be treated unfairly by the law unless there is a good justification for it.
Therefore, a lawyer representing a woman who has had her equal rights violated, can get support from the Equal Protection Clause.
Find out more on the Equal Protection Clause at https://brainly.com/question/2252772
#SPJ1
What are the 14 steps in the criminal process
Answers
Answer:
Investigation
Arrest
Prosecution
filing or information by a prosecutor
Arraignment by a judge
pretrial detention or bail
plea bargaining
Trial/Adjudication of guilt
sentencing by a judge
appeals
punishment or rehabilitation
Explanation:
I hope that helps you
this landmark u.s. supreme court case held that evidence of officer credibility as a witness may be considered exculpatory evidence and should be given to the defense during discovery.
Answers
This landmark U.S. Supreme Court case held that evidence of officer credibility as a witness may be considered exculpatory evidence and should be given to the defense during discovery.
The case is Brady v. Maryland.What is Brady v. Maryland?Brady v. Maryland is a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court established that the prosecution must provide exculpatory evidence, including any evidence that may affect the credibility of a witness, to the defense during the discovery phase of a criminal case.The case was filed in 1963 and centered on John Brady, who was charged with murder along with an accomplice, Donald Boblit. Brady admitted to being present when the murder occurred, but he claimed that Boblit was the one who committed the crime.Boblit was tried first and was convicted of first-degree murder.
Learn more about supreme court here:https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ11
Moana wants to apply for a permit to open up a stall for Bazaar Ramadhan. However, her application was rejected by Andy, the head of licensing of the town council without any justification. Advise Moana on the best remedy that she can apply.
Answers
There are a number of steps Moana could take to attempt to remedy the situation. She could:
request for an explanationsubmit a written appealseek legal adviceWhat is a permit?Note, the term permit is used to refer to a formal document issued by a government or regulatory agency that grants permission to an individual or organization to carry out a specific activity, such as building construction within a certain time frame and under certain conditions.
In Moana's case, by requesting an explanation from the head of licensing to get more information about the reasons behind the decision, submitting a written appeal to possibly the town council, or seeking legal advice from a lawyer, she could remedy the situation.
You can learn more about a permit here https://brainly.com/question/24648029
#SPJ1