In recent cases involving advertising in space offered by the government, case outcomes favoring advertisers have often been determined by the nature of the ______.
speech involved

yes she will  because she made an appointment to do so

She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.

According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.

As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

Learn more about on Law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6534668

#SPJ5

Answer:

a member of congress

Explanation:

I think im not 100% though

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is TRUE that the shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for "comfort and esteem."

According to various research findings, the people that move from periodic social drinking to substance abuse usually do such due to the need to give themselves comfort when they are suffering from one sad moment or depression.

The other way people change from periodic drinking to substance abuse is to elevate their self-esteem, especially when they are low on confidence.

Hence, in this case, the statement is TRUE.

Answer:

is there a list of statemnts that you forgot orrrrr?

\

Explanation:

There is no valid agreement between Bu and Aria in the situation given above, as there was no common acceptance for the purpose of buying and selling the car at the desired price.

A valid agreement can be referred to or considered as an agreement that holds the conditions of offer being accepted by the parties involved, and eventually leads to the formation of a legal contract between both the parties involved in the contract for one single offer.

Therefore, the significance regarding a valid agreement has been aforementioned.

Learn more about a valid agreement here:

https://brainly.com/question/28080427

#SPJ1

True, rights not given to the federal govt are rights given to the states, this is the principle of federalism.

About Federalism

Federalism is a mixed or compound form of government that divides the powers between a central government (the "federal") and regional govts (provincial, state, cantonal, territory, or even other sub-unit governments) under a single political system. In the unions of states under the Old Swiss Confederacy, federalism as it is known now, was first practised.

Federalism is distinct from both devolution inside a unitary state, where the regional level of govt is subservient to the general level, and confederalism, where the general level of govt is subject to the regional level.

To know more about federalism:

brainly.com/question/8305583

#SPJ4

Answer:

Its good

Explanation:

lot of benefits

The individual-rights advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights. Thus, option (a) is correct.

What is advocates ?

Defend, debate, and support someone's unique idea is what the word "advocate" refers to. Typically, lawyers use the term "advocate." A person with the right to represent a party in court is known as an advocate.

Advocates for individual rights mean defending the human and legal rights of people. Advocates for individual rights include those for civil rights, economic rights, social rights, political rights, cultural rights, etc.

Therefore, option (a)  individual-rights advocates is correct.

Learn more about on advocates, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8994455

#SPJ2

If jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday. The journal entry is Debit Salaries Expense $10,500; Credit Salaries Payable $10,500.

The appropriate entries to record the given transactions are:

1. Dec. 31

Debit Salaries Expense $10,500

Credit Salaries Payable $10,500

(To record  accrue salaries expense)

Salaries Expense = Weekly payroll ÷ Days in work week × Days to accrue

Salaries Expense = $17,500÷5×3

Salaries Expense =$10,500

(Days to accrue: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)

2. January 5

Debit salaries expenses $7,000

Debit salaries payable  $10,500

9$17,500 -$7,000)

Credit Cash $17,500

(To record salaries expenses)

Therefore the entry for Dec 31 is to debit salaries expenses and credit salaries payable.

Learn more about journal entry here:https://brainly.com/question/14279491

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday (january 5th) for the previous full week. assume juniper park senior center has a five day workweek and has an unadjuste balance in salaries expense of 510000

Record the adjusting entry for accrued salaries on December 31.

Record the journal entry for payment of salaries made on January 5.

Salaries Expense:

Answer:

Puffing is illegal under federal law.

Explanation:

Puffing and commendation of goods do not create an express warranty, nor does as affirmation of the value of the goods. However, leaving your car running, unattended, to warm it up in cold weather is called "puffing" and it's illegal in many places

To satisfy the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, all of the following requirements must be met EXCEPT B) The injured party must prove negligence on the part of the defendant.

Res ipsa loquitur is a legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff to establish a presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant without providing direct evidence of the defendant's negligent behavior. In order to apply the doctrine, certain requirements must be met.

A) The injured party has not contributed to the accident in any way: This means that the plaintiff must show that they did not contribute to the cause of the accident or their injuries. If the injured party played a role in causing the accident, the doctrine may not apply.

B) The injured party must prove negligence on the part of the defendant: This statement is the exception mentioned in the question. Normally, in a negligence claim, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, who must demonstrate that the defendant acted negligently. However, under res ipsa loquitur, the plaintiff can establish a presumption of negligence without explicitly proving it.

C) The event is one that normally does not occur in the absence of negligence: This requirement means that the type of accident or injury that occurred would not typically happen without someone being negligent. The event itself should strongly indicate that negligence was involved.

D) The defendant has exclusive control over the instrumentality causing the accident: This means that the defendant had control over the object or situation that caused the accident, and the plaintiff did not have control or contributed to the incident. The defendant's exclusive control suggests that they had the opportunity to prevent the accident from occurring.

Therefore, the correct answer is B) The injured party must prove negligence on the part of the defendant, as res ipsa loquitur allows the plaintiff to establish a presumption of negligence without explicitly proving it.

Learn more about Res ipsa loquitur:

https://brainly.com/question/29829778

#SPJ11

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

In a tort action, the plaintiff would not need to prove their claims beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, choice (A) is right.

A doubt that is grounded on logic and common sense rather than pure speculation is referred to be a reasonable doubt. It might result from a thorough and objective analysis of all the data or from a dearth of evidence.

Either the evidence is insufficient or there is a reasonable doubt, depending on the circumstances. When plaintiff  you are not completely convinced of the defendant's guilt after weighing and analyzing all the evidence, there is reasonable doubt.

A defendant cannot be found guilty based on conjecture or supposition.

Learn more about reasonable doubt, from :

brainly.com/question/29986194

#SPJ4

Answer:  C

Explanation:” This is like a judge's or jury's decision in a court case. Once the arbitrator decides that all of the parties' evidence and arguments have been presented, the arbitrator will close the hearings.  Hope its right! Im pretty sure it is though

Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.

From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.

From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.

Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650

#SPJ1

Article II, section four: The President, VP, and all civil officers of the US, will be eliminated from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. U.S. Const.

Twenty-5th amendment, section 1: In case of the removal of the President from office or of his demise or resignation, the vice chairman shall grow to be President.

Congress permitted the 25th modification on July 6, 1965. The states finished ratification on February 10, 1967, and President Lyndon Johnson certified the amendment on February 23, 1967. The first use of the twenty-fifth amendment took place in 1973 whilst President Richard Nixon nominated Congressman Gerald R.

Learn more about amendment here https://brainly.com/question/687600

#SPJ4

Answer:

Referencing allows you to acknowledge the contribution of other writers and researchers in your work. Any university assignments that draw on the ideas, words or research of other writers must contain citations. Referencing is also a way to give credit to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas.

Explanation:

Answer:

A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.

Explanation:

so it should be b

Answer:

Political Persuasion

Explanation:

The ways they influence policy decisions are: association, bandwagon, fear, weasel words, either/or, loaded language, card stacking, and charisma. They use these strategies and strong words to shape our view on a public opinion.

There are three main levels to the federal court system: district courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the last level of appeal in the federal system, are the three levels of appeal.

What is the court's final decision?

the final court decision that settles all disputed issues and the parties' rights in relation to those issues. The only decisions left after a final judgment are how to enforce the judgment, whether to award costs, and whether to appeal.

What are the three ways that an appeal to the Supreme Court can be handled?

appeals through state and federal courts, appeals through the original jurisdiction.

Learn more about Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ4

Here's link\(^{}\) to the answer:

bit.\(^{}\)ly/3gVQKw3

According to O*NET, some common tasks performed by Lawyers are:

In legal matters and disputes, a lawyer advises and represents businesses, individuals, and government agencies. The primary responsibilities of a lawyer are to uphold the law while protecting the rights of their clients.

Lawyers provide legal advice, conduct research, and gather evidence or information, draft legal documents such as contracts, divorce decrees, or real estate transactions, and defend or prosecute in court. Lawyers can practice in a variety of areas, including corporate, family, bankruptcy, and environmental law.

Read more about Lawyers

brainly.com/question/20397360

#SPJ1

Answer:

The regulation of genetically modified (GM) foods in the United States is overseen by several government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Here are some of the key laws and regulations affecting GM foods in the United States:

FDA regulation: The FDA regulates GM foods as "foods" under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). GM foods are subject to the same safety requirements as other foods, including pre-market review by the FDA to ensure that they are safe to eat.

USDA regulation: The USDA regulates GM crops under the Plant Protection Act. GM crops that are intended to be grown in the United States must undergo a review process to ensure that they are not harmful to other plants or to the environment.

EPA regulation: The EPA regulates GM crops that are engineered to produce pesticides or other chemicals under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).

Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology: In 1986, the White House issued the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology, which established a framework for regulating GM foods and other biotechnology products in the United States. The framework outlines the roles of the FDA, EPA, and USDA in regulating GM foods and other biotechnology products.

Labeling requirements: In 2016, the USDA established a mandatory labeling requirement for GM foods sold in the United States. The requirement, which went into effect in 2020, requires food manufacturers to disclose the presence of GM ingredients on their product labels.

It's worth noting that the regulation of GM foods in the United States is a complex and evolving issue, and there is ongoing debate over the adequacy of current regulations. Some advocacy groups and consumer organizations have called for stricter regulation of GM foods, while others argue that current regulations are sufficient to ensure their safety.

Answer:

The laws and regulations affecting genetically modified foods in

the United States are governed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The USDA regulates the production and labeling of GM foods, while the EPA oversees their environmental impacts. The FDA is responsible for ensuring that GM foods are safe to eat and properly labeled. Additionally, the National Organic Program (NOP) regulates the use of GM foods in organic products.

Explanation:

Answer:

It is questionable whether or not retrial after a hung jury is Constitutional. ... If a mistrial occurs due to a hung jury, the prosecutor may decide to retry the case. A judge may decide to disallow this in some cases, but the prosecutor is usually allowed to proceed.

In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.

An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.

If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.

To know more about proceedings:

https://brainly.com/question/29791715

#SPJ11

Answer: free exercise clause

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights is made up of the first ten amendments in the Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights consist of the rights of every Americans.

According to The Free Exercise Clause, Americans have the right to practice any religion that they want. Under the Free Exercise Clause, the religious beliefs of the citizens are protected. Also, the government shouldn't support any religion or become involved with one is as not to bring about controversy.

The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.

The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.

As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.

To learn more about Indonesia, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31792781

#SPJ4

Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.

In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.

Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.

To know more about law:

brainly.com/question/30133385

#SPJ4

Answer:

almost good faith

insurable interest

contribution

Explanation:

please follow me