In order to have a criminal conspiracy, the minimum number of participants is:

Attempt robbery or dacoity while armed with a lethal we-apon.— If the criminal is armed with a dangerous we-apon while attempting to commit robbery... dacoity, the im­prisonment with which such offender must be sentenced shall  Law.

Central Government Law committing grave harm voluntarily utilizing dangerous we-apon or ways —Whoever, except as provided in section 335, voluntarily causes grievous harm by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing, or cutting, or any instrument which, when used as a we=apon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or corrosive substance.

To learn more about Law, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ1

Yes, verbal contracts valid. Unless they violate the statute of frauds. Option D is the correct answer.

Legally speaking, verbal agreements can frequently be just as binding as written ones. Although they could be very challenging to regulate, you should take solace in the knowledge that there are relevant state and federal laws that can support the enforcement of such contracts and safeguard your legal rights. Even so, placing your agreement in paper is still the best approach to ensure that all parties are protected. Option D is the correct answer.

A sort of agreement involving two or more parties that is established orally rather than through a written document is known as a verbal contract. Regardless of whether an oral agreement comprises all of the components of a contract or not, there are situations when a physical written contract is required in order for the agreement to be enforceable. Option D is the correct answer.

Learn more about Contracts here:

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ4

True. When a property is sold in a foreclosure sale, the proceeds are typically used to satisfy the outstanding mortgage and pay off any associated fees and expenses.

If there is any surplus remaining after these obligations are met, it generally belongs to the homeowner, in this case, Jill.

Foreclosure is a legal process in which a lender takes possession of a property due to the homeowner's failure to make mortgage payments. It is usually a last resort for the lender to recover their investment. Once the property is sold at a foreclosure auction, the proceeds are first used to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance. This ensures that the lender recovers the amount owed to them.

In Jill's case, once the mortgage is satisfied, meaning the remaining balance on the loan has been paid off, and all the fees and expenses related to the foreclosure sale have been settled, any surplus funds are typically returned to the homeowner. The $6,000 surplus mentioned in the statement would therefore go to Jill.

It's important to note that foreclosure laws and procedures can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and there may be specific rules governing the distribution of surplus funds. However, in many cases, the homeowner is entitled to any surplus remaining after satisfying the mortgage and other obligations.

In summary, it is true that when Jill's home is sold in a foreclosure sale, and after the mortgage is satisfied and all fees are paid, the $6,000 surplus would go to Jill. This is because the surplus represents funds that exceed the amount necessary to satisfy the mortgage and associated expenses, and as the homeowner, Jill is entitled to any remaining funds.

Learn more about mortgage here

https://brainly.com/question/29981765

#SPJ11

They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)

Answer:

If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.

Explanation:

Answer:

State Circuit Court.

This is because speed driving or driving above the speed limit is a minor offence that need not be dealt in a federal, higher court and can be easily taken care of by the lower state courts.

Explanation:

The State Circuit Court is an intermediate level court where local and limited jurisdiction cases are heard. These courts are the court systems that deal with cases that are not serious enough to be tried in the higher courts. They are also known as state courts.

In the scenario of being pulled over at the interstate by a state highway patrol car for speed driving or driving above the limit, the summons will be heard in a circuit court. This is because the case is just a minor one as compared to more serious offenses, which makes it eligible to be tried in a lower court rather than at the federal level.

The filibuster was seldom utilized all through a large portion of American history however has turned into a much of the time involved strategy in the U.S. Senate during the most recent 20 years. Option B is correct .

Filibusters became more common toward the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, prompting serious consideration of amending Senate rules to end the practice. At that point, the Senate had grown in size and became more active. Because of the amount of work that needed to be done each session, a senator who chose to filibuster might make it hard for the body to move forward and get concessions from senators who wanted to approve their measures.

10 ​​​​​: Grand jury is the role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a Judge , Option B is correct .

The federal criminal case prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, presents evidence to a grand jury. If there is "probable cause" to suspect the defendant of committing a crime, the grand jury decides whether a trial should be held.

11 : Chief office of the president is the  Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the Cabinet . Option C is correct .

The White House Office, the Public safety Gathering, the Committee of Monetary Counselors, and the Workplace of The board and Financial plan are the four associations that make up the Leader Office of the President , which gives the president guidance in significant approach regions.

12 : Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as Fireside chats .  Option C is correct .

Throughout the 1930 s and 1940 s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave radio addresses that were referred to as "fireside chats." FDR gave radio broadcasts to calm the nation during a turbulent time and explain things in a way that most people could understand.

Learn more about filibuster :

brainly.com/question/29551874

#SPJ4

Complete question as follows :

The filibuster

A. Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate

B. Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years

C. Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years

D. Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate

Question 10

The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a

A. Judge

B. Grand jury

C. Prosecuting attorney

D. Defense attorney

Question 11

The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the

A. Cabinet

B. White House Staff

C. Executive office of the president

D. Department of the Interior Top of Form

Question 12

Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as

A. A frequent annoyance

B. Weekly Ramblings

C. Fireside Chats

D. Happy times

A "friend of the court" is literally and commonly used to refer to a brief filed by someone who is interested in but not party to a case.

A legal brief filed by a party that is not a direct participant in the case is referred to as a friend of the court brief. This brief is frequently filed by an individual or organization with a significant stake in the outcome of a case, but who is not a party to it.Friend of the Court is an individual or organization that is not a party to a lawsuit but has a strong interest in its outcome and can provide information that may be useful to the court.

The individual or organization files a brief explaining their viewpoint on the case and how they believe the case should be resolved.Friend of the Court briefs are usually allowed by a court when it is believed that the information provided in the brief will be beneficial to the court in reaching a verdict or ruling.

Learn more about brief filed here:https://brainly.com/question/28468624

#SPJ11

Answer:

have lost a sense of judgment and self-control and have slight impairment of balance, speech, vision.

The legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are essential in the construction industry. Duty of Care refers to the responsibility that a person owes to another to ensure that they do not cause harm.

Breach of Duty of Care occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care and this failure causes harm to another. Causation is when the failure to take reasonable care is the cause of the harm. Damage refers to the harm suffered by the injured party.In the construction industry, the duty of care is owed by employers to employees, contractors, and members of the public who may be affected by their actions. The duty of care is also owed by the employees to their employers and co-workers.

A breach of duty of care can occur in many ways. An employer may fail to provide the necessary safety equipment or training to employees, which can cause harm. An employee may fail to follow safety procedures, which can cause harm to themselves or others.The case law that illustrates the concept of Duty of Care is Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case, the claimant bought a bottle of ginger beer from a shop and found a decomposed snail inside the bottle. The claimant suffered from shock and gastroenteritis.

The court held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure that the product was safe.The case law that illustrates the concept of Breach of Duty of Care is Nettleship v Weston (1971). In this case, a learner driver was being taught by her friend and was involved in a car accident. The court held that the learner driver was responsible for the accident, and her friend, the instructor, was held liable for the injuries caused.The case law that illustrates the concept of Causation is Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969).

In this case, the claimant went to the hospital complaining of stomach pains and vomiting. The doctor on duty sent him home, and he died later that night from arsenic poisoning. The court held that the hospital was not liable for the death of the claimant as the failure to diagnose the condition was not the cause of the death.

The case law that illustrates the concept of Damage is Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963). In this case, the defendant left a manhole on the road with no warning signs. The claimant fell into the hole and suffered burns from molten tar. The court held that the defendant was liable for the injuries caused to the claimant as he failed to provide a warning of the danger.

In conclusion, the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are significant in the construction industry. These principles ensure that employers, employees, and members of the public are protected from harm. It is the responsibility of all parties to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others.

To know more about Duty of Care visit-

brainly.com/question/30782971

#SPJ11

For each crash a teen is involved in, the number of close calls that are they involved in is 10.

This refers to the auto accident where a driver loses control and bumps into another object or vehicle which leads to damage.

Hence, we can see that For each crash a teen is involved in, the number of close calls that are they involved in is 10.

This shows the percentage amount of teens involved in close calls of crashes.

Read more about car crashes here:

https://brainly.com/question/25241464

#SPJ1

The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.

For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means

From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is  Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct

Learn more about question of fact from:

https://brainly.com/question/13857186

Answer:

Steps:

Explanation:

1: Compare the bank account balance to the cash balance on your books

2: Scrutinize your bank statement

3: Scrutinize your cash book

4: Adjust the balance of your bank account

5: Adjust the balance of your books

6: Record the reconciliation

(Hope this helps?)

Answer:

Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.

Explanation:

Answer:

A lawyer should not accept representation in a matter unless it can be performed competently, promptly, without improper conflict of interest and to completion. Ordinarily, a representation in a matter is completed when the agreed-upon assistance has been concluded.

Explanation:

Homeowners have the legal right to keep intruders off their property. People can do this by erecting fences, posting signs, or simply asking trespassers to leave. This is also known as an easement.

An easement is a nonpossessory right to use and/or enter another's real property without owning it. It is best exemplified by the right of way that one landowner, A, may have over the land of another, B. In most jurisdictions, an easement is a property right and type of incorporeal property in and of itself.

A landowner can call the police in cases of serious, repeated annoyance or threatened harm, and the police will usually warn the person to stay away and, if necessary, make an arrest.

Therefore, the person can charged of easement for using a portion of their neighbor's land for years as a parking space.

To learn more about easement, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13059197

#SPJ9

Answer:

Crime scene investigators.

Explanation:

Forensic examination is a type of forensic examination that examines traces of evidence left by people and things to solve identification (which particular person or specific object left traces), diagnostic (establishing the safety or state of objects that created traces) or situational (establishing the conditions for the formation of traces) tasks within a crime investigation, with the ultimate objective of determining who, how and when commited the crime under investigation.

Answer:

Intellectual property consists of tangible forms of creations of the mind. Inventions, written works, drawings, bred plants and industrial designs are examples of intellectual property. Ideas alone are not intellectual property.

Explanation:

Answer & Explanation:

The statement that criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain that "law is a partial system that protects private interests" is not accurate. Criminologists from the consensus perspective generally argue that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve conflicts, reflects the need for social order, and is a product of value consensus. They do not typically view law as a partial system that exclusively protects private interests.

Criminologists from the consensus perspective maintain all of the following EXCEPT:
d. law is a partial system that protects private interests.
The consensus perspective emphasizes that laws are created based on a general agreement and shared values in society, focusing on the role of law in maintaining social order. Therefore, options a, b, and c align with this perspective, while option d does not, as it suggests a bias in the legal system favoring private interests.

From the consensus perspective, criminologists maintain that law reflects the need for social order and is a product of value consensus. However, they do not believe that law is a neutral mechanism that helps individuals resolve their conflicts or that it is a partial system that protects private interests. Instead, they argue that law is a universal set of rules and norms that promote social cohesion and regulate individual behavior. In their view, the criminal justice system should aim to prevent crime and rehabilitate offenders, rather than solely punishing them. This approach emphasizes the importance of community involvement and social intervention in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
To know more about private interests visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29765850

#SPJ11

The given statement "d. the process tends to serve the interests of small, organized elites" is true because the modern constitutional amendment process in Texas has been criticized for being dominated by influential and well-organized interest groups.

These groups often have the resources and networks to promote and push for amendments that align with their specific interests. This has led to concerns that the process may not adequately represent the diverse interests of the general public and can favor the preferences of small, powerful elites.

The modern constitutional amendment process in Texas has witnessed a tendency to serve the interests of small, organized elites. This is because influential interest groups, equipped with ample resources and strong networks, hold considerable sway over the process.

Such groups are often able to promote and advocate for amendments that cater to their specific agendas, giving them an advantage in shaping the state's constitution.

This dynamic has raised concerns about the lack of representation of the broader public and the potential for the process to prioritize the preferences of powerful elites over the interests of the larger population.

For more questions like Population click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/27779235

#SPJ11

— These three techniques, electronic surveillance, undercover operations, and use of informants are the most important techniques that have assisted the investigative agencies to combat organized crime and transnational crimes.

Answer:

dang you really think im writing all that

The decision of one of the U.S. district courts would be recorded in the official reports called United States Reports. District Courts are federal trial courts of the United States with jurisdiction over cases that are involved in federal laws.

District courts are divided into 94 districts that are in the 50 states and Puerto Rico, and they are considered the workhorses of the federal court system. They are the trial courts where cases of federal laws are first tried. The decision of one of the U.S. district courts would be recorded in the official reports called United States Reports.

United States Reports (U.S.) is an official reporter that is a series of bound case books that are published by the United States Government Printing Office. The decisions from the U.S. district courts may appear in other publications, but the decisions are officially published in the United States Reports.

Learn more about jurisdiction

https://brainly.com/question/12448353

#SPJ11

In order to preserve order, safeguard individual rights, and foster a just and peaceful cohabitation, laws serve a variety of objectives and tasks that are fundamental to society.

The framework for preserving public safety and order is established by laws. For example, traffic regulations control vehicle movement and guarantee the safety of motorists and pedestrians.

To protect people's liberties and rights, Laws are created. They offer a framework for the legal defense of human rights, including the rights to life, liberty, and property.

For settling conflicts and disagreements in a fair and unbiased manner, laws offer a method. To resolve disagreements between people, groups, in a society, or even nations, courts interpret and apply the law.

Learn more about Law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15439594

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Law agency

Explanation:

The law of agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a set of contractual, quasi-contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that involve a person, called the agent, that is authorized to act on behalf of another (called the principal) to create legal relations with a third party.

Answer:

no, the answer is false.

Explanation: