Answers
In Brown v. Plata, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled that inmate mental health care had deteriorated in the state of California because of prison overcrowding.
Which mental health service is most likely to be provided in prison?Correctional psychologists, often known as forensic psychologists in correctional environments, offer psychological evaluations, interventions, and therapies. They provide services like inmate screening and categorization and act as the primary provider of mental health services in the prison systems. Crisis management.
The Court upheld a three-judge panel's directive to remove an estimated 46,000 prisoners from California's jail system. They came to the conclusion that the detainees' subpar medical and mental health care was mostly caused by overcrowding.
To know more about California's jail system, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/22934644
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
a) a forensic anthropologist
b) a forensic pathologist
c) a forensic sociologist
d) a forensic sociologist
Answers
Answer:
C a forensic sociologist
Explanation:
they talk to the police and the citizens.
The best profession, which helps in building the relationship between the police and the citizens is a forensic sociologist. Hence, Option D is correct.
Who is a forensic sociologist?Being a forensic sociologist, an individual will be engaged in the activity of analyzing the shreds of evidence and also keeps the research that is related to criminal cases or civil cases.
It is the duty of the forensic sociologist to make sure that not a single piece of evidence will be neglected during the whole investigation. For keeping a track of all the things, forensic sociologists maintain the relationship between the police and the citizens.
Sometimes people often get confused between forensic sociology and criminology. They both are having different sciences. Forensic sociology is an applied science. On the other hand, criminology is a specialized social science.
Thus, Option D is correct.
Learn more about forensic from here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
11. Although he knew he was guilty of the crime, the mobster said he wouldn't answer questions
about it on the stand. Which amendment protected him?
a. 4th amendment
b. 5th amendment
6th amendment
d. 7th amendment
Answers
Answer:
5th amendment
Explanation:
The 5th amendment goes as follows "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Answer:
5th
Explanation:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
5th Amedment, U.S Constitution
Bacically the constitution allows you to not answer the police officer if he asks you what happened, it is similar to Meranda Rights
the long term damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is
Answers
Answer:
It can lead to addiction. If drinking then it will be hard to leave you would always be drunk and if you take drugs then you will become an addict
Why would the Supreme Court overturn a verdict?
A) Jury could not agree
B) Violation of Municipal Law
C) Violations of the defendants civil/constitutional rights
D) The jury’s decision was not fair.
Answers
Answer:
i think its c
Explanation:
8. Why can't the Vice President take part in
Senate Debate?
Answers
Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
Why can't the Vice President take part in Senate Debate?
The only constitutional obligation for a vice president is to preside over the Senate, except from taking over as president in the event of a president's demise or resignation. Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
According to the Constitution, the vice president of the United States leads the Senate. The vice president officially preside over the receipt and tabulation of electoral votes cast in presidential elections in addition to acting as the meeting's presiding officer. He or she also has the only authority to break a deadlock in the Senate.
A vice president in the government is someone whose main duty is to take the president's position in the case of the latter's demise, resignation, or incapacity.
Learn more about Vice President :
https://brainly.com/question/18882530
#SPJ1
In contracts that are not between merchants selling goods, a promise to keep an offer open for a certain time period must be supported by the offeree’s consideration. Such agreement to not revoke an offer is called a(n):________.
Answers
Answer:
Option Contract
Explanation:
A contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties. In contract law, the agreement to keep an offer open for a certain period of time, within which the contract cannot be revoked by the offeror is known as an Option contract. This must be supported by the offeree's consideration.
If the offeree rejects the agreement, then his right of acceptance has been terminated in most jurisdictions. Other factors that can result in the termination of the offeree's power of acceptance include; a counter offer by the offeree, an expiration of the offer, and a conditional acceptance by the offeree.
mohammed worked in a garment manufacturing firm. he was a new immigrant from afghanistan and due to the terrorist activities in his country he faced several discrimination issues at his place of work. he was subjected to humiliation and verbal abuse, and subsequently he was physically assaulted by his co-workers a few blocks from the company premises. he filed a suit under title vii alleging racial discrimination by co-workers and his employers. to establish a prima-facie case he should present the court with:
Answers
In order for Mohammed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII, he must demonstrate several elements to the court. Firstly, he must show that he belongs to a protected class. This means that he must show that he was discriminated against based on his race, color, national origin, religion, or sex.
In Mohammed's case, he is an immigrant from Afghanistan, which means that he belongs to a protected class based on his national origin. This means that he can allege racial discrimination by his co-workers and employers.Secondly, Mohammed must show that he suffered an adverse employment action. This means that he must show that he was subjected to some form of discrimination that adversely affected his employment. In Mohammed's case, he suffered verbal abuse, humiliation, and physical assault by his co-workers. These actions caused him harm and negatively impacted his ability to perform his job.Thirdly, Mohammed must show that the adverse employment action was based on his membership in a protected class. In other words, he must show that he was discriminated against because of his national origin.Finally, Mohammed must show that the discrimination occurred in the context of his employment. This means that he must show that the discrimination occurred at his place of work or was related to his employment.
To know more about discriminated visit:
brainly.com/question/29801080
#SPJ11
What did the Presidents Task Force on 21st Century Policing recommend that All officers and agency hires would need to possess
Answers
The Presidents Task Force on 21st Century Policing is in order to help the President reduce crime effectively while fostering public trust, identify best practices and provide additional recommendations to him.
What is the presidents task force 21st century?The President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing was written by Laurie Robinson, a professor at George Mason University.21st Century Policing tactics, according to the IACP, are best practises created to assist agencies in promoting effective crime reduction while fostering public trust and preserving officer well-being.Barack Obama, the president of the United States, issued an executive order on December 18, 2014, establishing the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Obama started it in response to the turmoil that erupted in Ferguson, Missouri after Michael Brown was shot by a police officer there.The Act specifies criteria for a number of important areas of law enforcement, such as the gathering of information regarding citizen complaints of racial and identity profiling. gathering information on police stops and detentions.Learn more about Presidents task force 21st century refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/29850633
#SPJ1
Explain the symbolism behind the great open hand and the key above the Justice Gate at the Alhambra.
Answers
The Great Open Hand and Key symbolize justice, protection, and authority in Islamic architecture at the Alhambra.
Islamic architecture is rich with symbolism and the Great Open Hand and Key over the Justice Gate at the Alhambra is no exception. The open hand, also known as the Hand of Fatima or the Hamsa stands for blessings, protection and the banishment of evil. It stands for fairness and justice representing the ability of the law to defend the just and uphold justice. On the other hand, the key represents power, insight and access.
It stands for the key to knowledge, discernment, and discovering the mysteries of justice. The hand and key represent the concepts of justice, truth and divine power collectively, emphasizing the significance of upholding justice and seeking truth in the exercise of law. They act as a tangible reminder of the principles guiding a just and equitable society.
Learn more about Islamic architecture at:
brainly.com/question/30174373
#SPJ4
Philosophy
How does determinism apply to our perception of the self?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.
a contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of a‹ _____ or a _____.
Answers
Answer:
A contract is an agreement that is enforceable by a court of law or a tribunal.:
Title of the Patriot Act gives the president the right to confiscate property of any foreign person who is believed to have participated in an
attack on the United States and also authorizes the Secret Service to
A. create a nationwide electronic crime task force
B. confiscate property of any citizen
C. force citizens born in other countries to relocate to community protection camps
D. submit any material so seized in a court case
Answers
Answer:
A. submit any material so seized in court case
Explanation:
Question 5 of
When you drive in the city, there is a lot going on. Which of the following a driver must do?
Answers
Answer:
The driver should focus on his driving, or there is a change of a car accident.
health departments should be able to enter your house without a warrant from a judge?
Answers
False. Health departments generally require a warrant from a judge to enter someone's house.
In most circumstances, health departments do not have the authority to enter someone's house without a warrant from a judge. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures and requires a warrant to be issued based on probable cause. However, there are some exceptions to this requirement, such as situations involving imminent danger or public health emergencies where immediate action is necessary to protect the public.
Nonetheless, in non-emergency situations, health departments typically need to obtain a warrant, demonstrating to a judge that there is probable cause to believe a violation of health regulations has occurred, before entering someone's house for inspection or investigation purposes.
To know more about Fourth Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7955252
#SPJ11
Which of the following is a responsibility reserved for STATE governments?
A
education of residents
B.
establishment of post offices
С
regulation of trade with other states
D
creation of immigration policy
Answers
Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous __________________.
Searching process
Thought process
Maneuver
Show of patience
Answers
Answer:
definitaly thought process but serching process to
Explanation:
Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.
Parking and PassingWhile driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.
Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.
One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.
There are several types of parking maneuvers :
AngledParallelPerpendicularPassing a vehicle requires a good judgement.
Learn more about "driving" here :
https://brainly.com/question/21945861
A county governed by a central party is best characterized as
A. communist
B. democratic
C. capitalist
D. Aristocratic
Answers
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two cases would the Supreme Court be most likely to review?
a case concerning a motor vehicle accident
✓
a case concerning presidential actions
a case involving two members of Congress
✓
a case in which a federal law is challenged
Answer is 2&4
Answers
Answer:
a case concerning presidential actions
Explanation:
Which of the following is not a step in formal rule making?
A.Publication in Federal Register
B.Formal hearing with a transcript
C.Publication of findings
D.Written comments by the public
Answers
The statement that is not a step in formal rule making is D.Written comments by the public.
What formal rule making?Rule consistency is described as the accuracy with which rules are implemented to individuals and groups, whereas rule formalization is concerned with how thoroughly organizational rules are documented.
The federal Administrative Procedures Act (APA) establishes two distinct processes for the creation of administrative rules: formal rulemaking, which calls for an on-the-record hearing and the presentation of evidence, much like a court proceeding; and informal rulemaking, which calls for notice to the public and an opportunity for comment on the proposed rule.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about rule at:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Marco and Colby decide to rob a pet store. The meet at malt shoppe to go over their plans. Marco leaves to buy a gun, and Colby leaves to steal a get-away car. Marco is arrested as he walks out of the gun shop with a new gun. Colby is arrested while trying to hotwire a car.
Should Marco be charged with attempt? Should Colby? Explain.
Answers
how can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answers
Answer: When a victim complains about an incident, the police officers do the right thing like getting all the information about the incident. But, the principles of Ubuntu is not about what is right, it is about what is ethical to do. The people should treat the victims respectfully and they should be given more empathy.
what does a city or other governmental entity (like jefferson barracks national cemetery in this case) have to show in order for a court to find that its restrictions are justified?
Answers
A city or other governmental entity must show that its restrictions are justified by proving that they are "reasonable" and "narrowly tailored" to serve a "significant governmental interest." This is known as the "intermediate scrutiny" standard, and it is applied to restrictions on speech or expression in public forums.
Under this standard, the governmental entity must demonstrate that its restrictions are necessary to achieve a legitimate governmental interest, such as protecting public safety or preventing disruption.
Additionally, the restrictions must be narrowly tailored, meaning that they must be the least restrictive means of achieving the governmental interest.
In the case of Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery, the governmental entity would have to prove that its restrictions on speech or expression are necessary to protect the dignity and solemnity of the cemetery, and that they are the least restrictive means of achieving this goal.
Overall, the governmental entity must show that its restrictions are reasonable, narrowly tailored, and serve a significant governmental interest in order to be justified under the intermediate scrutiny standard.
For more similar questions on scrutiny:
brainly.com/question/24309787
#SPJ11
An officer has made application for a court order approving electronic surveillance of Defendant. The order is granted, stating: "From June 1 to June 7, Officer X, having established probable cause, is granted the authority to intercept the wire communications of Defendant." The officer proceeded to enter Defendant’s house, without a warrant, to install the listening device. Eventually, a recording is made of Defendant discussing his illegal activities with a friend. Defendant is arrested, charged, and has filed a motion to suppress the interception. Defendant asserts that the entry into his house was illegal. Discuss.
Answers
Answer:
he wasn't granted permission to enter the home
Explanation:
he was granted right to monitor not break in to his home
who is my celibrety crush its somone on fututama
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Im not sure but im gonna say Zoidberg
As an expert witness, a forensic scientist is ethically responsible for doing what? Telling the whole truth Giving information that will help the prosecution Making sure the suspect goes to jail All of the above.
Answers
As an expert witness, a forensic scientist is ethically responsible for telling the whole truth. Forensic science is used in courts of law to investigate criminal offenses and civil lawsuits. Forensic science is the application of scientific knowledge and techniques to criminal and civil investigations and legal proceedings.
As an expert witness, a forensic scientist is called upon to provide specialized scientific knowledge and information to aid the court in deciding cases. Expert witnesses have an ethical obligation to tell the truth in their testimony, whether that testimony helps or hurts the prosecution or the defense.
Therefore, it is the duty of the forensic scientist to provide an accurate and unbiased assessment of the facts to the court, which is critical in ensuring justice is served. They should never deliberately lie or withhold information, which could potentially result in an innocent person being wrongfully convicted or a guilty person being allowed to go free.
To know more about Forensic visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32330162
#SPJ11
T/F it has been a legal requirement that any restaurant which serves more than 180 meals per day must allow customers to take their uneaten food away
Answers
False. It has not been a legal requirement that any restaurant which serves more than 180 meals per day must allow customers to take their uneaten food away.
There is no widespread legal requirement that mandates restaurants to allow customers to take their uneaten food away. While some jurisdictions may have specific regulations or incentives in place to encourage food establishments to donate or distribute surplus food to prevent waste.
There is no universal requirement based on the number of meals served. However, individual restaurants may have their own policies regarding allowing customers to take leftovers home.
To learn more about legal requirement click here : brainly.com/question/4243891
#SPJ11
If a buyer and an agent have agreed to an oral buyer agency agreement, this agreement is
Answers
Answer:
The agreement is good and final.
Explanation:
Hope it helps (:
A request for admission can lengthen a trial because the parties have to take the time to prove facts on which they may already agree. True or false?.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
true
what amendment guarantees the right of due process of the law
Answers
The fifth amendment guarantees the right of due process of the law.
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to due process of the law. Specifically, it states that no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
This means that the government must follow fair and transparent legal procedures when depriving a person of their rights or property. Due process includes both procedural and substantive components, which means that both the process and the outcome must be fair and just.
This amendment is an important safeguard against arbitrary government actions and ensures that individuals are treated fairly under the law.
To know more about fifth amendment, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29528178#
#SPJ11
Agencies develop what
from legislative guidelines.
Answers
Answer:
Federal administrative law derives from the President, agencies of the Executive Branch, and independent regulatory agencies. Agencies are given the authority to create administrative law through laws enacted by Congress. The law comes in the form of rules, regulations, procedures, orders, and decisions.