In Brandenburg v. ohio (1969), the supreme court established the Brandenburg test, which states that speech can be prohibited if there was high risk of harm from the speech and if the harm was about to happen or immediate. this reflects a change in clear and present danger supreme court applications of the first amendment.
The Supreme Court ruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), that speech endorsing illegal behavior is protected by the First Amendment unless it is likely to spark "imminent lawless action." The Schenck v. United States (1919) clear and present danger doctrine was also the subject of the Court's final significant ruling. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. had ruled in that case that speech could be suppressed by the government if it posed "a clear and present danger of bringing about the substantive evils that Congress may prohibit."
Know more about "Brandenburg v. ohio" visit
brainly.com/question/30759233
#SPJ4
Answer:
clear and present danger
Explanation:
I got it right on the test.
Do you think Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China
collectively to move out of the Warring State Period and establish
imperial order? Evaluate
Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.
Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.
In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.
Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953
#SPJ11
1. Discuss the first reason Carter gives for believing the abuse of women and girls is the number one human rights violation.
2. Explain the other "serious blight" that Carter says contributes to this human rights issue.
3. Describe at least two of the abuses to women that Carter explains as concerning him the most.
4. Discuss what a paycheck has to do with the abuse of women and girls.
The first reason Carter gives for believing the abuse of women and girls is the number one human rights violation is because women and girls are they most vulnerable in human right violation
What are they human rights violation as stated by Jimmy CarterJimmy Carter gave a talk at a ''TEDWomen conference'' where he gave his first reasons for believing the abuse of woman and girls is the number one human rights violation because of the misinterpretation of set of rules regarding women in the religious holy scriptures by men and ''they interpret these rules to make sure that women are ordinarily relegated to a secondary position compared to men in the eyes of God''
The other "serious blight" that Carter says contributes to this human rights issue is women and girls living poverty are exposed violence hence abuse of poor and helpless women has resulted to the increase in abuse of women,
Another "serious blight" that Carter says contributes to this human rights issue is genital mutilation which Carter describe it as horrible thing women faces that is not practiced in American but in some other countries where the outer part of the female genitals is completely which is not hygienic and it is believed to control the female from being way ward .Also women are faced with modern day slavery and human trafficking were helpless women are forced into ''sexual slavery in all countries in the world''.
Also female don't feel safe even in school as they are faced sexual assaults because school authority are not taking measures protecting them from sexual assault.
The role of paycheck has to do with the abuse of women and girl due to misinterpretation of seeing women as a weaker vessel and not seen as equal to men ''discrimination against girls and women," of not allow women to occupy higher position at work his another to be consider as serious issues and also considered as an abuse of women and girls which is the 'lack of equal payment for equal work,''
In conclusion this what paycheck has to do with the abuse of women and girls.
Learn more about Human rights violation on brainly.com/question/32299021
#SPJ4
Criminal prosecution of physical abuse is more common than:
Criminal prosecution of physical abuse is more common than the prosecution of emotional maltreatment.
Physical abuse cases that result in criminal charges, such as battery or assault, are typically prosecuted more frequently than cases of emotional abuse. Physical abuse is frequently accompanied by obvious signs of harm, which makes it simpler to recognize and establish in court. Additionally, authorities prioritize the prosecution of physical abuse because it is frequently thought to have a more severe and immediate impact on the victim's well being.
On the other hand, due to its covert nature and the lack of tangible evidence, emotional maltreatment, which includes psychological abuse, verbal abuse, or neglect, can be harder to prove. The prosecution of emotional abuse is not nonexistent it should be noted and it can be pursued in some circumstances if there is enough evidence.
Learn more about Criminal prosecution at:
brainly.com/question/31852451
#SPJ4
which type of release from prison involves the decisions of a parole board?
The type of release from prison that involves the decisions of a parole board is the parole.Parole refers to the release of a prisoner from jail before the end of their sentence.
Parole is conditional release that permits the individual to leave prison and re-enter the community. The Parole Board typically imposes the conditions of release, and failure to follow them could result in a return to jail.What is the role of a parole board?The role of the Parole Board is to determine whether a prisoner should be released from prison or held until the end of their sentence. The board assesses the risk that a prisoner will reoffend, taking into account factors such as the nature of the crime, the prisoner's conduct while in jail, and the prisoner's level of rehabilitation. The board will also establish terms and conditions of release that the parolee must follow.What are the release options from prison.There are three primary types of release from jail: Discretionary release, Mandatory release, and Conditional release.Discretionary release is an early release granted to prisoners who have served a portion of their sentence and have demonstrated that they can be released safely. It is granted solely at the discretion of the Parole Board.Mandatory release is granted to prisoners who have served the entire length of their sentence and who are not considered a danger to society. They are released at the end of their sentence by the prison administration without a Parole Board hearing.Conditional release, also known as parole, is the release of a prisoner before the end of their sentence, but it is subject to conditions established by the Parole Board. The board may impose specific terms and conditions on the release, and the individual must obey them to stay out of prison.
To know more about Parole , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/7271233
#SPJ11
Laura approached Tyrone, an undercover police officer, and asked him to kill her father.
Laura is guilty of what?
She is guilty of solicitation.
Which of the following is NOT a type of crime pattern analysis? *
Crime and incident series identification
General profile analysis
Victim identification
Hot spot identification
a(n) __________________ for a juvenile is similar to a criminal trial for an adult.
Describe the impact of the War on Drugs and Crack Cocaine had on the Black communities in LA and
Elsewhere
Prior to the War on, overt lynchings and explicit discrimination were the main tools used to oppress Black people. Then mass incarceration, which emerged gradually as a result of several congressional acts, made it considerably simpler.
What is war?War is defined as a violent armed conflict between states, governments, society, or paramilitary groups such as mercenaries, insurgents, and militias. It is characterized by severe violence, damage, and mortality, and it employs either conventional or irregular military troops. Warfare refers to the shared behaviors and characteristics of various types of war, as well as warfare in general.
The Comprehensive Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1984, in particular, abolished parole in the federal system, which increased the number of elderly inmates. Next, mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines were set by the 1986 Anti-Act.
Therefore, The primary methods of oppressing Black people before the War on were overt lynchings and overt discrimination.
Learn more about war here:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ1
a sexual assault victims restricted/unrestricted report will be maintained for reference for what minmum number of years
It is significant to note that, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific agency in charge of keeping the reports, different jurisdictions may have different retention rules for sexual assault reports. However, generally speaking, reports of sexual assault are kept on file for a long time—often for many years.
For instance, the Department of Defense (DOD) in the US has specific policies regarding the storage of reports of sexual assault, both restricted and unrestricted reports. DoD guidelines state that reports of sexual assault that are restricted must be kept for at least 50 years, while reports that are unrestricted must be kept for at least 75 years.It is also important to keep in mind that reports of sexual assault may occasionally be kept forever, particularly if they are related to an active criminal investigation or if the victim requests that they be kept for a longer time.In order to maximise their chances of obtaining support and justice, sexual assault victims should be aware of the retention procedures in place at the organisation in charge of keeping their report. Furthermore, it is crucial that agencies keep accurate and thorough records of all reported sexual assaults because doing so can help victims get the support they need and help hold offenders accountable.Because of this, reports of sexual assault are typically kept on file for a long time—often for many years.
Learn more about sexual assault victim here: https://brainly.com/question/1970589
#SPJ4
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Why does it keep taking money from me I don't even use this app it's taking my money and I want it back
Answer:
1dk im sorry :(
Explanation:
a defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
Yes, its true that, according to the officer's testimony, yes. In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood.
The accused murderer admitted to the crime but insisted that he killed the victim out of self-defense after she lunged at him with a knife. The investigating officer gave testimony during the trial on the crime scene and the victim's health at the time of death. The prosecutor questioned the officer if the police photographer's image of the crime scene adequately captured what he had seen there. The prosecutor then showed the officer the photo. According to the officer's testimony, yes.
In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood. motive, planning, and earlier or later behavior.— Any truth that demonstrates or serves as a justification or preparation for any significant information or fact at issue is relevant.
Learn more about self-defense Visit: brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : A defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
Match the operation with the appropriate lead agency
1. Investigate deliberate damage to an interstate rail line
2. Conduct house-to-house notification of emergency evacuation
3. Barricade state and interstate highways
4. Incarcerate those suspected of vandalizing the rail line until they are charged
state highway patrol
Federal Bureau of Investigation
county sheriff
local police department
The correct match of the operation with the appropriate lead agency is given below.
1. Investigate deliberate damage to an interstate rail line - County Sheriff
2. Conduct house-to-house notification of emergency evacuation - Local Police department
3. Barricade state and interstate highways - State Highway Patrol
4. Incarcerate those suspected of vandalizing the rail line until they are charged - Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Federal Bureau of Investigation or FBI is a special agency that investigates a variety of criminal activities like terrorism, cybercrime, public corruption, civil rights violations, and other major crimes. It is the domestic intelligence agency of the United Sates that also enforces federal laws.
To know more about Federal Bureau here
https://brainly.com/question/13776234
#SPJ1
David claims that he was suffering from depression when he shot his father. He did admit, however, that he knew it was wrong and could have stopped himself from committing the crime. In court David will likely be found:______
Answer:
guilty
Explanation:
David new What he was about to do Was wrong and could have stopped himself
What does a plaintiff need to file if they want the defendant to stop performing an action?
Answer:
If you were wronged, you have the right to sue. But, there are things you have to know before you sue, like:
Who to sue,
Where they are,
What you need to do before you sue them,
Where you should sue them, and
If you should sue them.
These are hard questions to answer, even in an easy case like a slip-and-fall in a store. For example, if you slip on the floor in a supermarket, you have to figure out if the store is part of a chain or just one store, if falling was partly or totally your fault, etc.
In a complicated case, like if the same slip and fall happened on land that the county owns, but that a government agency rents, you have to figure out who was responsible for slippery ground, and follow the laws for suing the government. If you sue a government agency, you have to follow the laws for notice. This is a fancy way of saying that before you sue a government agency you have to fill out papers that say that you’re suing them.
There’s a time limit to give notice. After you file your notice, you don’t have much time to file your lawsuit. Claim limits like this protect hospitals and other businesses. If you do not follow these rules, get ready to fight. If you don’t do things on time, you may lose your right to sue. You could ruin your lawsuit.
Even more important are time limits called "statute of limitations." These statutes, or laws, say when you can file your action. If you don’t file on time, you lose automatically. For example, if you are in a car crash, you have 2 years to file a lawsuit. This might not be true for your case. You have to check the time limit yourself. But in general this is the case. If you wait one day after the time limit, the Court won’t let you sue, except in very special circumstances.
This means that even if you have a good case, you lose because you didn’t file on time. The person you sue can challenge you at any time. They can appeal and win. That’s because the statute of limitations says if the Court can hear and decide the case at all. If you wait too long, you take away the Court’s jurisdiction to hear your case.
What are Summons and Complaint:
A general civil lawsuit starts when the plaintiff files 2 forms.
A Summons is a notice that says there’s a lawsuit.
A Complaint is a form that says how the person was hurt, who hurt them and how much the damages are.
Where do I file my lawsuit?
There are a lot of things to think when you decide where to file your complaint. For example:
Jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction can mean more than one thing. The Court has to have “jurisdiction” over the defendant. This means that the Court has the right to hear and decide a case for the person you are suing. In general, you have to file your lawsuit where the injury happened, or where the contract was supposed to happen, or where the defendant lives.
There can be other requirements. Check the California Code of Civil Procedure .
Then, the Court also has to have jurisdiction over how much money you want. You have to file your lawsuit in the right court:
Small Claims Court,
Limited Jurisdiction Superior Court, or
Unlimited Jurisdiction Superior Court.
Venue:
Jurisdiction says in what State and what Court you file your lawsuit. Venue is the County where you file your action. Usually, this is the County where the defendant lives or where the injury happened. But, sometimes you can change the Venue. See Law and Motion.
Court locations/hours/maps:
See the list of courthouses. Click on each court to see the hours and maps.
Unlimited Jurisdiction cases:
If you have a case worth more than $25,000, you have an unlimited jurisdiction case. For these cases, you have to give the Clerk:
The Complaint, or petition,
A Civil Case Cover Sheet ,
The filing fee (see the local fee schedule ), and
An original copy of the Summons.
The Clerk will endorse the Complaint, the Cover Sheet and the Summons, and give them back to you with something called a “Civil Lawsuit Notice”. This tells the date and time of your first Court hearing, and which Department (courthouse and courtroom) and Judge your case is assigned to.
You’ll also get an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Information
Explanation:
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
What is one trait that state and federal courts have in common?
A. Both must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
B. Both divide jurisdictions and name courts the same way.
C. Both set strict guidelines all defendants must meet before trial.
D. Both are presided over by judges who serve four-year terms.
Answer: A. Both must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
Both state and federal courts must obey the laws outlined in the U.S. Constitution because the Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States. The Constitution outlines the structure of the federal government, including the judicial branch, and sets forth certain rights and protections that apply to all individuals in the country. Both state and federal courts must adhere to the principles and protections set forth in the Constitution, such as the right to due process of law and the right to a fair trial. This ensures that the legal system operates in accordance with the principles of the Constitution and protects the rights of individuals who come before the courts.
State University provides housing on campus and in some adjacent off-campus neighborhoods. To lease a university house or apartment, a person must be a student at State. This requirement is a. an operation of law. b. a breach of contract. c. a novation. d. a condition.
This requirement that is ised by this school before they lease a house out is known as a condition precedent.
What is a condition precedent?This is a legal term that helps to describe all the events and fact that must first be established before a specific contract can be put into consideration.
The precedent is what is set here before anyone can be leased the properties.
Read more on lease here: https://brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ1
In the previous tax year, Albert had a long-term loss carryover of $4,500, he had a current year long-term gain of $1,480, and he claimed the maximum long-term loss allowed ($3,000) on Schedule D in the previous tax year. Albert had a $591 short-term loss in the current year. What is the amount of long-term gain or loss Albert will be able to claim on Schedule D this year after using the carryover loss from the previous year?
Answer: -$611
Explanation:
Long term capital loss = -$1500
Add: Current Capital gain = $1480
Less: short term capital loss = -$591
Therefore, the amount of long-term loss that Albert will be able to claim on Schedule D this year after using the carryover loss from the previous year would be:
= -$1500 + $1480 - $591
= -$611
How many calendar days does a new employee have to complete the RBS training program
Any on-premise alcohol server and manager must be certified by an accredited RBS training provider and pass an ABC exam within 60 calendar days from the first date of employment. The RBS exam is currently available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Punjabi.
if you run an advertisement defaming a fast-food competitor by saying its food processing does not meet government standards, but you cannot prove the truth of your allegations, you may have committed the intentional tort of commercial assault.
a. true
b. false
You could have committed the intentional tort of commercial assault if you made false or defamatory claims about a rival in advertising without being able to back them up. This assertion is accurate.
The remarks made in the context of commercial advertising are especially covered by this tort, which is comparable to defamation. A competitor's reputation and company may suffer if false or defamatory claims about them are made in advertising.
This may be viewed as unfair competition. If a judge determines that you engaged in commercial assault, you could be responsible for the harm caused to the rival. It's crucial to make sure that any claims made about a rival in an advertisement are true and backed up by facts.
To learn more about advertising
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ4
the law of demand states that a higher price leads to a lower quantity demanded and that a lower price leads to a higher quantity demanded. (T/F)
The law of demand states that a higher price leads to a lower quantity demanded and that a lower price leads to a higher quantity demanded False.
What legal principle implies that, generally, a greater price results in a smaller amount demanded?Major points. According to the law of demand, a lower price results in a bigger amount demanded whereas a higher price results in a lower quantity demanded. Tools used to characterize the relationship between quantity desired and price are demand curves and demand schedules.
What exactly is the law of demand?According to the law of demand, quantity demanded for any good or service and other factors like consistent price are inversely connected to one another. A product's price increase causes a decrease in consumer demand for that same product.
What does the law of demand say as a good's price rises?According to the law of demand, there is an inverse relationship between a good's price and the number of people who want it. There will be less demand for a good when its price goes up, and vice versa, when its price goes down, there will be greater demand for that good.
To Know more about demand states
https://brainly.com/question/24019366
#SPJ4
If I were to add alcohol to the education system what problems would I CREATE? Meaning what problems would I create if I taught kids about alcohol in school as a module?
A lot of people don't understand this question.
Answer:
reducing the number of hours committed to studying
Explanation:
hope it helps
\( \: \: \: \: \)
you can bring alcohol in school of it's your project or if your using it on science
Alcohol use could also affect performance by reducing the number of hours committed to studying, completing homework assignments, and attending school. ... Both studies found that drinking had a direct negative effect on GPA and an indirect negative effect through reduced study hours.hope it helps\( \: \: \: \: \: \)
which law or practice guideline did the occupational safety and healthcare administration and oncology nursing society established
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) established "Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs" practice guidelines to protect healthcare workers who handle hazardous drugs in the workplace.
These guidelines provide recommendations for handling hazardous drugs safely, including proper use of personal protective equipment, safe storage and disposal of hazardous drugs, and training and education for healthcare workers. The guidelines are based on OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard and other relevant regulations, as well as best practices in oncology nursing. The goal is to reduce the risk of exposure to hazardous drugs, which can cause serious health problems, including cancer, reproductive problems, and other adverse health effects.
Learn more about OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard:
https://brainly.com/question/27993242
#SPJ11
one example of Treaty and instrument used in international
payments. Please explain the benefit of each.
One example of a treaty used in international payments is the Bretton Woods Agreement, while an example of an instrument is the Letter of Credit.
The Bretton Woods Agreement, established in 1944, aimed to promote stability in international monetary relations. It created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to facilitate economic cooperation and support development. One of its key benefits was the establishment of fixed exchange rates, which reduced currency volatility and promoted international trade.
On the other hand, a Letter of Credit is a financial instrument used in international trade. It serves as a guarantee of payment from a buyer's bank to a seller, ensuring that the seller will receive payment once the agreed-upon conditions are met. This instrument provides security to both parties, as the seller knows they will be paid, and the buyer knows that payment will only be made upon successful completion of the transaction.
To know more about International Payments, visit:
brainly.com/question/33985660
#SPJ11
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
State court
Court of Public Opinion
Federal Court
Answer:
It would be heard in a Federal Court.
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a Federal Court.
I hope this helped at all.One concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to:
a. encourage the public exposure of true privatte facts b. protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure
c. allow the government to tap telephone conversations
d. place criminal sanstions on the use of a persons name without their permission e. product the publication of false light stories
The concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure.
This tort is designed to prevent people from intruding into the private lives of others without their permission. It also serves to prevent individuals from publicly disclosing private facts about another person, regardless of whether the facts are true or not.
Additionally, the tort seeks to protect people from being placed in a false light, which is when an individual is portrayed in a way that is not true or accurate.
By protecting individuals from these forms of invasion, it safeguards their right to privacy and ensures that their private lives are kept private.
Know more about private facts here
https://brainly.com/question/30847167#
#SPJ11
Answer b is the right response. Invasion of privacy is a tort that aims to safeguard people's right to private and freedom from inappropriate public exposure. Included in this are safeguards against encroachments on seclusion, the public exposure of personal information, publicity cast in a false light, and unauthorised use of one's name or likeness.
The concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure. This includes protection from intrusion upon seclusion, public disclosure of private facts, false light publicity, and appropriation of name or likeness without permission.
learn more about invasion of privacy here
https://brainly.com/question/2732893
#SPJ11
Your client, who is ninety-five years old, first contacted you in 2009 to complete her Last Will and Testament, which you did. However, she started to contact you regularly in 2011 in the middle of dementia saying that she wanted to leave everything to her mother. Now, she has insisted on completing a new will leaving everything to her mother, and you proceed with it to make your client happy, but also because you know that this final version of the will is not valid under the defense to formation of duress. True False
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Cohesion is the term that justifies the invalidation of an act, because that act has or was performed on illegal grounds. A testament cannot be an invalid claiming coercion, even if the person who issued it has dementia or another problem that impedes their abilities.
A testament represents an individual's last will and shows what he wants to happen after his death. The will is a legal document and valid in any situation.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
distinguish social behavior and legal behavior for example
Answer:
What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?
The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.
Explanation:
robert offers to give summer a ride to the airport. summer accepts. the day of summer’s flight, robert never shows up. summer sues robert for breach of contract. what should the court decide?
The court should likely decide in favor of Summer, as Robert's failure to show up constitutes a breach of contract.
The court should probably rule in Summer's favor and hold Robert accountable for contract breach. When Summer agreed to accept Robert's offer of a ride to the airport, a contract was created. Robert breached his contract by failing to appear on the day of Summer's flight. He failed to deliver the promised service, which caused Summer harm or inconvenience.
A breach of a contract may result in legal repercussions, such as the payment of compensation to the injured party in the form of damages or other remedies. The proper outcome in this case would be decided by the court after taking into account the evidence and any applicable contract laws.
Learn more about breach of contract at:
brainly.com/question/29891945
#SPJ4