In a jury trial where the defendant pleads insanity as a defense, the question of whether the defendant was actually insane at the time of the crime will ultimately be determined by the jury.
Here are some additional points to consider:
The burden of proof for an insanity defense is on the defendant, meaning that he or she must provide evidence that supports the defense.The standard for an insanity defense varies by state, but most jurisdictions use either the M'Naghten test or the Model Penal Code test to determine whether a defendant was legally insane at the time of the crime.If the jury finds that the defendant was legally insane at the time of the offense, he or she may be acquitted of the crime or found guilty but with a reduced sentence, depending on the laws of the state.The jury must decide whether the defendant was suffering from a mental disease or defect at the time of the offense, and if so, whether it rendered the defendant incapable of understanding the nature and quality of his or her actions, or incapable of distinguishing right from wrong.
Learn More About Defense
https://brainly.com/question/22809074
#SPJ11
discuss what should be done when a judge behaves unethically and unprofessionally
When a judge behaves unethically and unprofessionally, it is crucial to address the situation appropriately. Here are some steps that can be taken:
Reporting the behavior: Any instances of unethical or unprofessional conduct by a judge should be reported to the appropriate judicial oversight body or commission. This ensures that the misconduct is documented and investigated.
Conducting an investigation: The judicial oversight body should conduct a thorough investigation into the reported misconduct. This may involve gathering evidence, interviewing relevant parties, and reviewing the judge's actions.
Disciplinary actions: If the investigation confirms the judge's unethical behavior, disciplinary actions should be taken. The severity of the misconduct will determine the appropriate disciplinary measures, which can range from private reprimands to public censure, suspension, or even removal from office.
Judicial education and training: To prevent similar incidents in the future, ongoing judicial education and training programs should emphasize ethical conduct, professionalism, and the importance of upholding the principles of justice.
Transparency and accountability: It is essential to ensure transparency in the disciplinary process and communicate the actions taken against the judge to maintain public trust in the judiciary.
Addressing unethical and unprofessional behavior by judges is vital for upholding the integrity of the justice system and maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. It requires a combination of reporting, investigation, appropriate disciplinary measures, ongoing education, and transparency to maintain high standards of judicial conduct.
Learn more about Investigation
https://brainly.com/question/29365121
#SPJ11
negotiators demonstrating duty ethics are less comfortable with engaging in marginally unethical behavior such as making false promises or misrepresenting information.
True. Negotiators demonstrating duty ethics are less comfortable with engaging in marginally unethical behavior such as making false promises or misrepresenting information.
What is meant by ethical behavior?Honesty, fairness, and equity in interpersonal, professional, and academic relationships as well as in research and scholarly pursuits are characteristics of ethical behavior. The rights, diversity, and dignity of both individuals and groups of people are respected in ethical behavior.
Following corporate policies, communicating effectively, accepting responsibility, being accountable, being professional, and having faith in and respect for your coworkers at work are all examples of ethical workplace behavior. These illustrations of moral behavior guarantee the highest level of output at the workplace.
Read more on on ethical behavior here"https://brainly.com/question/27962109
#SPJ1
T or F Negotiators demonstrating duty ethics are less comfortable with engaging in marginally unethical behavior such as making false promises or misrepresenting information.
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
Fancorp regularly trades in securities on a national exchange.Which of the following is true concerning the company’s requirement to report to the SEC?
The options available are:
a) Must file annual and quarterly financial reports
b) Requirement to file depends on the company’s assets and shareholder base.
c) Not required to report information to the SEC.
d) Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.
Answer:
d) Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.
Explanation:
It is expected that firms or companies who regularly trades in securities on a national exchange is required by law under the United States security and exchange commission to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports using form 10-K and form 10-Q made available by the security and exchange commission.
This is done by the filling the Form 10-K for yearly reports while Form 10-Q for their quarterly reports, and report the business advancement, for example, budgetary exchange, mergers, procurement and so forth to them consistently
Hence, Fancorp is required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.
Is QAnon a Threat to American Safety?
Which of the following is
a way to psychologically measure criminal behavior
Explain and analyze what a good leader is
1 paragraph please see I'll mark you brainilest
Answer:
the good leader is who always speaks the trues
Explanation:
There is a unique link between leadership qualities and organizational success. Leadership is the problem of many organizations but little attention is given to leadership-related research. This paper aimed to examine the qualities of a good leader using principal component analysis (PCA). The study adopted a quantitative research approach by eliciting perceptions of respondents on the qualities of a good leader through structured questionnaire. One hundred and fifty (150) questionnaires were administered to top management of companies within the construction industry, banking industry, food industry, and information technology industry. One hundred and twenty-seven (127) were retrieved and considered for further analysis. The data obtained were analyzed using PCA. The findings revealed the principal qualities of a good leader to be: 1) accessibility and dedication, 2) neutrality and modesty, 3) aspiration and attentiveness, 4) believe and aptitude, 5) dignity and amiability, 6) insight and confidence, 7) vitality and concentration, 8) originality and honesty, 9) responsibility and team spirit, 10) decency and self-assurance, 11) charitable, 12) comical and maintenance culture, and 13) reliability. It is recommended that leaders should demonstrate these leadership qualities to enhance organizational effectiveness and efficiency.
Read this passage from the Articles of Confederation:
Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual
friendship and intercourse among the people of the
different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each
of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from
Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and
immunities of free citizens in the several states.
Which founding principle of the articles is reflected in the passage?
Answer:
Making citizens of the states also citizens of the Union.
Explanation:
Through this passage, and specifically by establishing that all the free inhabitants of the states would enjoy the same rights in the other states in which they were not residents.
Thus, by guaranteeing a unity of rights throughout the territory of the Union, the Articles of Confederation sought to reaffirm the legal unity of all the states, in order to form not only a country with legal security for its inhabitants, but a nation with unified legal criteria at the government level.
Answer:
The founding principle of the Articles of Confederation that is reflected in the passage is A. Making citizens of the states also citizens of the union.
Explanation:
The passage outlines that the free inhabitants of each state, except for certain groups like paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, would be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states. This reflects the idea of creating a union of states with shared rights and responsibilities, rather than a loose confederation of independent entities.
If you notice clear fluid leaking from your
vehicle, it is most likely motor oil.
True or False
what is the stair tool in investigation
Answer:
Investigation. As you proceed through the STAIR tool, the process of Analysis and Investigation can become somewhat circular, as the investigation reveals new information, and new information is analyzed to confirm, disprove, or modify the theories of suspects and events that you are considering.
Explanation:
STAIR tool is the most useful and important tool brought into use in the process of investigation as well as analysis of different theories of events that take place.
What is the significance of an investigation?Investigation can be referred to or considered as the process of deriving results of an event that has taken place by taking into consideration all the key factors that hold a relation with the event that happened during a given time.
STAIR, as a tool of investigation, holds a great amount of significance in the process of analysis, studies, and researches conducted in the process of investigation throughout the entirety of the process. The suspects are major focus of an investigation process.
Therefore, the significance regarding an investigation has been aforementioned.
Learn more about investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/12042816
#SPJ2
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?.
The supporters of the 2019 Texas law that banned straight-ticket voting stated that it would boost voter understanding.
All judicial offices in Texas are currently elected on a partisan basis. For interim court vacancies, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county leaders and confirmation by the Senate. According to the Texas constitution, district and appellate judges are chosen by public vote. Unless the candidate passes a severe independent campaign criterion, only a judicial candidate who has been proclaimed the victor of a party primary is permitted to compete on the official ballot in the general election.Thus this is what Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas made argument in support of the law.
Learn more about Texas Law here: https://brainly.com/question/28996037
#SPJ4
Specific Texas laws regarding recounts in elections allow each of the following except
a. a candidate can request a recount if he or she loses by less than 10 percent.
b. the candidate who requests a recount is required to pay for the recount.
c. a manual recount must be used.
d. canvassing authorities are given very little discretion when interpreting an indentation on the chad.
Specific Texas laws regarding recounts in elections allow each of the following except d. canvassing authorities are given very little discretion when interpreting an indentation on the chad.
The specific Texas laws regarding recounts in elections have provisions that allow certain actions and requirements for candidates, but they do not include giving canvassing authorities very little discretion when interpreting an indentation on the chad. Let's examine the options:
a. A candidate can request a recount if he or she loses by less than 10 percent: This is allowed under Texas law, where a candidate who loses by a small margin can request a recount.
b. The candidate who requests a recount is required to pay for the recount: In Texas, the candidate who requests a recount is indeed required to pay for the recount expenses.
c. A manual recount must be used: Texas laws specify that a manual recount should be conducted in certain situations, providing an additional safeguard in the recount process.
d. Canvassing authorities are given very little discretion when interpreting an indentation on the chad: This statement is not true regarding Texas laws. The interpretation of indented chads or similar issues during a recount is typically subject to the discretion and judgment of the canvassing authorities.
To know more about specific Texas laws regarding recounts in elections, click here: brainly.com/question/226843
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of domestic policy?
OA
A peace treaty is signed with another country.
OB.
A local government issues new parking regulations.
O c.
The government increases federal aid for school districts.
D.
A state repaves its major roads and highways.
Answer:
The government increases federal aid for school districts.
Explanation:
The government increasing federal aid for school districts is an example of domestic policy. Hence, option C. is correct.
Domestic policy is a body of laws, rules, and initiatives intended to influence the lives of a nation's citizens. It comprises regulations for the environment, welfare, healthcare, and education.
The correct option is C."The government increases federal aid for school districts" while the alternative options are not examples of domestic policy. Peace compacts, which are agreements between two nations to stop a war, are Option A. New parking rules are provided by the local authority as Option B. Repaving important roads and highways is Option D, a task carried out by a state government.
The purpose of domestic policy is to minimize unrest and dissatisfaction among the country's citizens. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Learn more about domestic policy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32041681
#SPJ5
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
A workers are guaranteed a certain income
B. Employers are encouraged to hire more workers
C. Employers are required to train more workers
D. Workers are allowed to organize into unions
Answer: B
Explanation:
The economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law can be summarized, as workers being guaranteed a certain income. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This means that employers must pay their employees at least the minimum wage, providing workers with a baseline level of compensation.
By ensuring that workers receive a certain income, the minimum wage law helps to protect them from extremely low wages and potential exploitation.
It establishes a basic standard of living and provides economic security for workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.
Thus, this economic benefit aims to improve workers' financial well-being and reduce poverty rates by setting a floor on wages in the labor market.
Learn more about minimum wage law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31859230
#SPJ2
During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he was sent to looked like wheels with rows of cells emerging from a central hub. Which design or style did this particular prison use?
A.
telephone-pole style
B.
plantation-style system
C.
radial design
D.
campus style
Differentiate terrorism and activism
Answer:
its a good question.
if you look at wiki definition (well its not necessiailty a source of truth, but it refers largely wat a typical person thinks).....terrorism is defined as use of violence to achieve ones' political goal, which is not really different from activism.
i guess the easy answer is that terrorism is a violent act against the traditional social value; whereas activism is a fight, sometimes violent, against what the society considers as unjustice.
if you want a more thoughtful answer, you can add that sometimes one's definition of activism can be considered as terrorsim by a different person, because different ppl in the society have different social value and priority.
say if some self acclaimed activists run riot on the street, some ppl would consider them as activists; but if you are a store owner who dont agree with their view, their act is an act of terror.
Explanation:
Do you think problem-solving courts are beneficial? Why or why not?
The problem-solving courts are beneficial or not may depend on numerous factors, like any kind of the specific needs of the community, the availability of any resources, and also the effectiveness of the court's programs and its interventions.
What are problem-solving courts?Problem solving courts are referred to as specialized courts that specifically aim to address all the underlying issues which usually contribute to any type of criminal behavior. These types of courts often offer treatment, counselling, and various other support services to help the defendants overcome challenges like addiction, mental illness, and homelessness.
Advocates practicing in these types of problem-solving courts usually argue that they can help in reducing recidivism rates, save money on incarceration costs, and also went on to provide more effective and compassionate justice.
Various researches has shown that problem-solving courts can be a very effective tool in reducing recidivism rates for certain type of populations, including drug offenders, veterans, and people with mental illness.
Apart from this, critics of these problem-solving courts often argue that these courts may be too lenient on offenders and that they also kind of divert resources away from traditional criminal justice approaches.
To know more about court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30039981
Yes, problem-solving courts are beneficial because it helps in the rehabilitation of selected defendants.
What is the problem-solving courts?The problem-solving courts can be described as the court that helps in the supervision of the treatment as well as the rehabilitation of the defendants .
It should be noted that the court do help in the process of helping people especially in the behaviour of the people and how tyhey can be reintroduced into the society so that theycab change their behaviour in the sense that the can become a new person and a better person.
Learn more about courts at:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
a situation where pervious autonomus states agree to come together for the purpose of federating is called
hi i am not really sure but i believe it is called:
federalize
definition is: form into a single centralized unit; unite in a federal union.
Based on the Upfront article and the excerpts from McDonald’s statement, why do you think the movement to lower the voting age had bipartisan support? *
From the McDonald’s statement we learn about a blind child in the story "A View From the Bridge." He approaches a man on a bridge and requests his assistance in capturing a fish. The youngster is blind, but the dad does not instantly understand this.
The title "A View from the Bridge" was most likely chosen to suggest that the guy serves as a link between the youngster and the outside world. The man is first reluctant to talk since it is not immediately clear what is going on. The father starts to view the world, nonetheless, from the viewpoint of a kid once it becomes clear. This brings attention to the essay's main idea. the "bridge's vista"
The unique perspective the man gains after experiencing the world through the eyes of a youngster is known as the "view from the bridge."
For such more question on McDonald’s statement.
https://brainly.com/question/15401924
#SPJ4
How is poverty related to other social problems, such as discrimination, immigration and crime?
Answer:
Explanation:
Children growing up in poverty are less likely to graduate high school or go to college, and they are more likely to commit street crime. People living in poverty might also migrate in hopes for a better life, some people even do it illegally. They also might be discriminated to ,since they don't have the privilege to wear the best clothes or be the most hygienic. They are also more likely to have several kinds of family problems, including divorce and family conflict
Which statement best describes a want?
O A. A want is something that would be nice to have.
O
B. A want is something that will help you save money.
O C. A want is something that will help you attain a goal.
D. A want is something that is necessary for survival.
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
After an outcry, how long do educators have to report the outcry to family services according to texas law?.
After an outcry, educators are required to report the outcry to family services according to Texas law immediately but not later than 48 hours.
What is an outcry according to Texas law?An outcry refers to the passage of information by a child or disabled victim of a statutorily- designated offense, like a sexual offense.
Educators are regarded as outcry witnesses. An outcry witness is legally obligated to report the statutorily-designated offense and may be invited during the trial proceedings to testify.
Under Texas law, an outcry by a child against any form of abuse can be used as sufficient legal evidence to support a criminal conviction of the perpetrator.
Thus, after an outcry, educators are required to report the outcry to family services according to Texas law immediately but not later than 48 hours.
Learn more about Child Abuse under Texas Law at https://brainly.com/question/14620054
#SPJ1
Find an online article that deals with any tort. It may involve a lawsuit already filed (remember it would be a civil case), or an incident that will likely result in a lawsuit. Post the link to the article and then write about the article. What specific torts do you think were involved? What remedies will be available for each tort? Do you see any defenses to the tort for the defendant or potential defendant?
Case: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
Torts involved: Negligence.
Remedies available for each tort: The plaintiff may be entitled to compensatory damages
What were the torts involved in the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. case?In the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., the main tort involved was negligence. The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, sued the defendant, Long Island Railroad Co., for injuries she suffered when a package was dropped on a platform causing a shockwave that led to her injuries.
The court held that the defendant was not liable for negligence as there was no foreseeable harm to the plaintiff. In this case, the remedies available for the tort of negligence would have included compensatory damages and potentially punitive damages.
Read more about Negligence
brainly.com/question/14480857
#SPJ4
Use your _____ on poorly lit or rural roads
Answer:
Use your high beams on poorly lit or rural roads
Explanation:
Why is DNA profiling not more commonly used in criminal investigations?
Answer:
DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.
Explanation:
How does hamilton further define the role of the courts? what line of reasoning does he employ here to support his claim?.
Hamilton acknowledged that no federal judge could defy the Constitution by imposing his or her will on the people: The assertion that every delegated authority action that goes against the spirit of the commission under which it is exercised is null and void is the clearest principle-based position.
Why did Hamilton support the Supreme Court's creation?In Federalist 78, Hamilton wrote, "Justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security."
What was Alexander Hamilton's take on the judicial system?The judicial systempossesses no power over the purse or sword; no indication of the strength or wealth of the community; and cannot tolerate any active resolution."It may truly be said to have only judgment, not FORCE or WILL," Alexander Hamilton writes in The Federalist Papers, No.78.
Learn more about Hamilton here:
brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ4
In Country D, business owners make the most economic decisions. As long
as they abide by the Fair Trade policies, they can decide what to produce,
how to produce, and for whom to produce without government
intervention. These decisions are made by business owners based on what
happens in the market. For example, a computer manufacturer recently
developed a new video gaming system but decided to wait until closer to
the holidays to release the system to the public because it believed
anticipation among consumers would allow the company to charge a
higher price for the system
Mixed Economy
Market Economy (Free Market)
Command Economy (Central Gov Economy)
Traditional Economy
Answer:
Allocation & Economic Systems
1. ALLOCATIONPREPARED BY SUE QUIRANTE FOR AP 9 & 10 RTPM-DSHS
2. USAGE NOTES • These are slides I use for my lectures on allocation and economic systems, a first quarter topic in Economics under the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. • All copyrighted materials were lifted from their respective sources under the spirit of fair use. As such, I am uploading these slides in the interest of helping out other public school teachers like me. This material should not be used for any commercial purpose. • Last modified: October 9, 2016
3. “ There isn’t enough to go around.” ~John
4. mekanismo ng pamamahagi ng pinagkukunang- yaman, produkto at serbisyo
5. Four Basic Economic Questions 1 What to produce? 2 How to produce it? 3 How much to produce? 4 Who gets what is produced?
6. Four Economic Systems
7. ECONOMIC SYSTEM consists of a matrix of: 1. social institutions (law, political institutions, religion, etc) 2. agents (individuals or actors) 3. organizations (corporations, unions, charitable org, not-for-profit firms, etc) 4. society (includes principles, beliefs, values)
8. ECONOMIC SYSTEM • function: coordinate the activities of agents in the processes of provisioning and allocation • most economies are a mixture that includes elements from all 3 types
9. Traditional Economy The Inuit tribes of Alaska
10. TRADITIONAL ECONOMY • evolved over time (traditions & custom form gradually) • rate of change is slow • rules of trade not apparent as economy but as moral system • medieval European rules against charging interest on loans—considered a sin in the Christian faith of the time
11. EXAMPLES • pre-modern Europe • pre-colonial tribes in the Americas, Australia, Africa, and Pacific islands
12. Command Economy
13. Command Economy• an overseeing government decides how resources are distributed amongst individuals within the system • trade and individual choice at the consumer and worker level is minimal or, in some cases, entirely non-existent • ideal: efficiency, equality
14. Command Economy• equality: by making sure to allot everyone an equal amount of wealth • in reality, the distributors of wealth at the government level often hoarded wealth for themselves
15. Market Economy • individuals meet in markets and decide what economic decisions they want to make for themselves • ideal : efficiency, freedom • emphasis on trade • exchange of goods and services
16. Mixed Economy • usually allow most people to decide how to obtain and spend capital, what work they would like to pursue, how much they would like to save, and what lifestyle they want to enjoy
17. Mixed Economy • at the same time, a command- based system from the government places restrictions on making choices and encourages market participants to move towards one decision over another
18. Synthesize What You Have Learned Who makes this decision? TRADITIONAL COMMAND MARKET MIXED What to produce? How to produce? How much to produce? Who gets what is produced? Dis/Advantage
Under which condition should I guess a guests ID be rechecked
The condition in which a person should have a guests ID rechecked is:
If the guest appears to be younger than his ID says.What is Safe Alcohol Awareness?This refers to the procedures which are put in place to ensure that an underaged person does not purchase or consume alcohol.
With this in mind, if a guest submits an Identification Card to show that he is eligible for buying a drink at a bar(for instance), then it is the responsibility of the bartender or whoever is in charge to double check the ID if the person appears to be underage.
Read more about alcohol use here:
https://brainly.com/question/17449396
in democracies, what are the two methods used by the ruling elite to control information?
In democracies, the ruling elite often use two methods to control information: censorship and propaganda. Censorship involves the suppression or restriction of certain parts of information, whether through legal means or through the control of media outlets.
Propaganda, on the other hand, involves the dissemination of biased or misleading information in order to influence public opinion. Censorship can take various forms, such as government control of the media, restrictions on the internet and social media, or even the suppression of certain books or publications. This method is often used to prevent the dissemination of information that may be deemed sensitive or harmful to the ruling elite's interests. Propaganda, on the other hand, is a more subtle approach to information control. It involves the dissemination of biased or misleading information, often through the media or other channels, in order to shape public opinion in a particular way. This can involve anything from selective reporting to the use of persuasive language and images. Both censorship and propaganda are tools used by the ruling elite to maintain their power and influence in a democracy. However, these methods can also have negative consequences for freedom of speech and the public's right to know. It is therefore important to remain vigilant and aware of these tactics in order to safeguard democracy and protect the free flow of information.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ11