In 2012, Gallup asked participants if they had exercised more than 30 minutes a day for three days out of the week. Suppose that random samples of 100 respondents were selected from both Vermont and Hawaii. From the survey, Vermont had 65.3% who said yes and Hawaii had 62.2% who said yes.

What is the point estimate of the difference in the population proportion in Vermont and Hawaii?

R, S, and T are collinear . Then 13 is  the length of RS.

What do collinear points mean?

The question to know

RS + ST = RT

RS = w + 1 ,  ST = w - 1

RT = 18

2w + 1 + w - 1  = 18

3w = 18

w = 18/3

w = 6

RS = 2 * 6 + 1 = 13

Learn more about  collinear points

brainly.com/question/1593959

#SPJ9

The net profit on sales ratio for the given financials is 15.68%

To calculate the net profit on sales ratio, also known as the profit margin ratio, you would divide the net profit by the total sales and multiply by 100 to express the result as a percentage.

The calculation is,

Net Profit on Sales Ratio = (Net Profit ÷ Total Sales) x 100%

Substituting the given values, we get

Net Profit on Sales Ratio = (R23,009 ÷ R146,700) x 100%

Do the arithmetic operations

= 15.68%

This means that for every Rand of sales generated, the company earned a profit of 15.68 cents.

Learn more about net profit here

brainly.com/question/30652816

#SPJ4

The table shows a proportional relationship between the cups of milk used and number of tablespoons of chocolate syrup used. The scale factor shown is 3/2. The constant of proportionality for this relationship is 3/2. The units for the constant of proportionality are teaspoons of chocolate syrup used per cups of milk used.

When it comes to ratios and fractions, the concept of proportion is very connected. When two amounts with the same unit are compared, they form a ratio. When comparing two quantities, a ratio enables us to determine whether one is larger or smaller.

Two ratios or two fractions are equivalent when they are compared according to the proportional rule. To put it another way, two ratios are said to be proportional when they are equal. Performing arithmetic operations on both sides of the ratio taught us that a ratio can be expressed in a variety of ways.

Both the 3: 5 and 6: 10 are equivalent ratios. This indicates that these ratios are proportional. This proportionality can be expressed mathematically as follows:

                                                 \($ \frac{3}{5} = \frac{6}{10}\)

Learn more about proportionality

https://brainly.com/question/29126727

#SPJ1

The rate at which the length of the cylinder is changing can be determined using the formula for the volume of a cylinder and applying the chain rule of differentiation. The rate of change of the length h is found to be -0.8192 in/sec.

The volume V of a cylinder is given by the formula V = πr²h, where r is the radius and h is the length of the cylinder. We are given that V = 128π cubic inches.

Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to time, we get dV/dt = d(πr²h)/dt. Using the chain rule, this becomes dV/dt = π(2r)(dr/dt)h + πr²(dh/dt).

Since the radius r is decreasing at a constant rate of 0.05 inches per second (dr/dt = -0.05), and the volume V is constant (dV/dt = 0), we can substitute these values into the equation. Additionally, we know that r = 2.5 inches.

0 = π(2(2.5)(-0.05))h + π(2.5)²(dh/dt).

Simplifying the equation, we have -0.25πh + 6.25π(dh/dt) = 0.

Solving for dh/dt, we find that dh/dt = -0.25h/6.25 = -0.04h.

Substituting h = 8 (since V = πr²h = 128π, and r = 2.5), we get dh/dt = -0.04(8) = -0.32 in/sec.

Therefore, the rate at which the length h is changing when the radius r is 2.5 inches is -0.32 in/sec, which is equivalent to -0.8192 in/sec (rounded to four decimal places). The correct answer is (b) -0.8192 in/sec.

To learn more about equation click here:

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Answer: 47

Step-by-step explanation:

You simplify it giving you 47

Answer:

f(3)=11

Step-by-step explanation:

3(3)^2=27

-6(3)=-18

27-18+2=11

The required sample size is 99 salespeople.

To estimate the population mean of travel days per year for salespeople with 98% confidence and a margin of error of 6 days, we need to determine the appropriate sample size. We can use the formula n = (z^2 * σ^2) / E^2, where n is the sample size, z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, σ is the standard deviation of the population (or sample, if known), and E is the desired margin of error. In this case, z = 2.33 (from the z distribution table for a 98% confidence level), σ = 32 (from the pilot study), and E = 6. Plugging these values into the formula gives us n = (2.33^2 * 32^2) / 6^2, which is approximately 98.68. We need to round this up to the next whole number, which is 99. Therefore, we should sample 99 salespeople to estimate the mean number of travel days per year for salespeople with 98% confidence and a margin of error of 6 days.

Learn more about sample size here

https://brainly.com/question/30647570

#SPJ11

The value of integer k is -5.

Polynomial equations formed with variables, exponents and coefficients .

Since the polynomial has three integer roots, we can express it as:

(x - r1)(x - r2)(x - r3) = 0

where r1, r2, and r3 are the three integer roots.

Expanding the left-hand side, we get:

x^3 - (r1 + r2 + r3)x^2 + (r1r2 + r1r3 + r2r3)x - r1r2r3 = 0

Comparing this with the given polynomial, we see that:

r1 + r2 + r3 = 1

r1r2 + r1r3 + r2r3 = k

r1r2r3 = 3

First we need to find the value of k. From the first equation, we see that one of the roots must be 1, since the sum of three integers that are not 1 cannot be 1. Without loss of generality, assume that r1 = 1. Then we have:

r2 + r3 = 0

r2r3 = 3

Since the roots are integers, the only possibility is r2 = -3 and r3 = 1.

Therefore, we have:

k = r1r2 + r1r3 + r2r3 = 1(-3) + 1(1) + (-3)(1) = -5

Therefore, the value of integer k is -5.

Learn more about polynomial equation here :brainly.com/question/28947270

#SPJ1

Lo que hicimos fue operar los terminos semejantes, es decir, los que poseen la letra a y los que poseen la letra x, por separado.

Answer:

what can i help u with

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph of x = |y| is as shown in the figure.

When we draw a vertical line, it intersects the graph at two points.

This means for the same value of x , we have two values of y.

Or in other words, for the same pre image, we have two images.

Hence it is not a function.

But for every value of x, we do have a value of y, hence it is a relation.

x = |y| is a relation but it is not a function

Answer:

:B

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that can help

The probability that 3 out of the 4 captured elk have been tagged is approximately 0.0053.

We can use the concept of combinations.

The total number of ways to choose 4 elk out of 24 is given by the combination formula:

C(24, 4) = 24! / (4!(24-4)!) = 10,626

Now, we need to consider the number of ways to choose 3 tagged elk out of the 8 tagged elk and 1 untagged elk. The number of ways to do this is given by:

C(8, 3) * C(1, 1) = 8! / (3!(8-3)!) * 1! / (1!(1-1)!) = 56

Therefore, the probability that 3 out of the 4 captured elk have been tagged is:

P = (Number of ways to choose 3 tagged elk out of 8 tagged elk and 1 untagged elk) / (Total number of ways to choose 4 elk out of 24)

P = 56 / 10,626

Calculating this division gives us the probability:

P ≈ 0.0053

So, the probability that 3 out of the 4 captured elk have been tagged is approximately 0.0053 .

Learn more about concept of combinations here : brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ4

Answer: Toni invested in pounds= $1350

Step-by-step explanation:rate of compound interest=4%

Step-by-step explanation:

Toni invests money into an account which pays a fixed rate of compound interest each year. The total value, £V, of her investment after t years is given by the formula:  

Given equation is in the form of

where P is the amount invested

'r' is the rate of interest

t is the time taken

P= 1350 is the initial amount invested

1+r= 1.04  (subtract 1 from both sides)

multiply it by 100 to get percentage

r= 4%

I just search it bc my brain dosent work any more

The recommended improvement is to introduce a placebo control (e.g., water) for Group B.

Here, we have,

To improve the experiment and research questions, introducing a placebo control (e.g., water) for Group B would be a valuable addition. This ensures that any observed differences in performance between the two groups are specifically attributable to the Awesome Drink Energy Juice and not influenced by other factors such as placebo effects or the act of consuming a beverage.

By including a placebo control, Group B would receive a drink that appears similar to the Awesome Drink Energy Juice but lacks the active ingredients or properties claimed to enhance performance. This allows for a more rigorous comparison between the effects of the energy juice and the placebo, providing a clearer understanding of the true impact of the intervention.

The improved research question would then be: Does the Awesome Drink Energy Juice improve Biochemistry performance compared to a placebo control?

Including a placebo control strengthens the experiment by providing a more robust comparison and addressing potential confounding variables that may affect the results. It helps to isolate the specific effects of the Awesome Drink Energy Juice and provides more reliable evidence of its impact on performance.

Therefore, the recommended improvement is to introduce a placebo control (e.g., water) for Group B.

learn more on structure :

https://brainly.com/question/31190503

#SPJ4

complete question:

The students in a Biochemistry class aren't performing as well as they could and the lecturer thinks that their grades can be improved by having students drink Awesome Drink Energy Juice. The lecturer splits the students into two groups, group A and group B: Group A receives the Awesome Drink Energy Juice and Group B does not. He asks them to complete as many Biochemistry problems as possible in one hour. At the end of one hour, Group A completed 27 problems and Group B completed 41 problems. How could his experiment (and research questions) be improved? Introduce a placebo control (e.g. water) for Group B O Add an additional control group that had good performance Make grades the dependent variable O Introduce a placebo control (e.g. water) for Group A O Add an additional control group that had low performance O Make grades the independent variable

Answer:

0.56

Step-by-step explanation:  

24/43 as decimal is approximately: 0.55814 (Rounded to fifth decimal place)

Answer:

54 hope it helped you out

The lengths of the sides are: AB = CD = 4.5667 inches; BC = 9.1333 inches and AD = 9.1333 inches

An isosceles trapezoid is a four-sided figure with two parallel sides and two non-parallel sides that are equal in length. In this problem, we are given that the perimeter of the isosceles trapezoid ABCD is 27.4 inches, and that BC is twice as long as AB.

Let's start by assigning variables to the lengths of the sides. Let AB = x, BC = 2x, CD = x, and AD = y. Since the perimeter of the trapezoid is the sum of all four sides, we can write the equation:

x + 2x + x + y = 27.4

Simplifying the equation, we get:

4x + y = 27.4

We also know that the non-parallel sides of an isosceles trapezoid are equal in length, so we can write:

AB = CD = x

Now we can use the fact that BC is twice as long as AB to write:

BC = 2AB

Substituting x for AB, we get:

2x = BC

Now we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of AD. The Pythagorean theorem states that in a right triangle, the sum of the squares of the legs (the shorter sides) is equal to the square of the hypotenuse (the longest side). Since AD is the hypotenuse of a right triangle, we can write:

AD^2 = BC^2 - (AB - CD)^2

Substituting the values we know, we get:

y^2 = (2x)^2 - (x - x)^2

Simplifying, we get:

y^2 = 4x^2

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

y = 2x

Now we can use the equation we found earlier to solve for x:

4x + y = 27.4

4x + 2x = 27.4

6x = 27.4

x = 4.5667

Now we can find the lengths of the other sides:

AB = CD = x = 4.5667

BC = 2AB = 2x = 9.1333

AD = y = 2x = 9.1333

So the lengths of the sides are:

AB = CD = 4.5667 inches

BC = 9.1333 inches

AD = 9.1333 inches

To know more about sides, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31139338#

#SPJ11

The rule of inference being used here is Modus Tollens. Modus Tollens is a valid deductive argument form that states if a conditional statement "If P, then Q" is true and the consequent Q is false, then the antecedent P must also be false.

In the given scenario, the conditional statement is "If the guard dog doesn't know a person, then it barks."

The observation that the dog didn't bark (Q is false) leads to the conclusion that the dog must have known the person (the antecedent P is false).

To know more about observation visit-

brainly.com/question/21053033

#SPJ11

Answer:

28x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

5+5+9+9 = 28

Answer:

(2,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of the line is m = -5

4 is your x1

-3 is your y1

Plug into the equation y - y1 = m(x - x1)

y + 3 = -5(x - 4)

y + 3 = -5x + 20

   -3             -3

y = -5x + 17

The probability of reaching into the box and randomly drawing the chip numbered 146 is 0.0027 or 1/364.

Probability is the chance or likelihood of an event taking place.

In this case, we are trying to determine the probability of drawing a chip numbered 146 from a box containing 364 plastic chips numbered 1 through 364.

To solve this, we will use the formula:

probability of an event = number of favorable outcomes / total number of possible outcomes.

Let's find out the favorable and total number of outcomes.

Favorable outcomes: The number of chips numbered 146 is only one.

Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes is 1.
Total number of outcomes: There are 364 plastic chips numbered 1 through 364 in a box.

Therefore, the total number of outcomes is 364.
Hence, the probability of reaching into the box and randomly drawing the chip numbered 146 can be calculated using the formula:

probability of an event = number of favorable outcomes / total number of possible outcomes.

Thus, the probability of drawing the chip numbered 146 is:

Probability = 1/364 or 0.0027 (rounded to four decimal places).

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/30703136

#SPJ11

The measures of central tendency of the first psychology exam in a semester are the average score, which was an 85.

The correlation coefficient and the range of scores from 95 to 65 are not measures of central tendency either.

The standard deviation is a measure of variability, not central tendency, that the measures of central tendency of the first psychology exam are the average and median scores. This states that the mode, correlation coefficient, range of scores, and standard deviation are not measures of central tendency.

Hence, the measures of central tendency for the first psychology exam in a semester are the average score (85) and the median score (80).

learn more about central tendency click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1288901

#SPJ11

The measures of central tendency for the psychology exam scores include the average, median, and mode.

The measures of central tendency of the first psychology exam in a semester include the average score, median score, and mode (most frequently occurring score).

The average score on the exam was 85, which represents the mean of all the scores.

The median score on the exam was 80, which represents the middle value when all the scores are arranged in order.

The most frequently occurring score was 82, which represents the mode of the scores.

https://brainly.com/question/33581018

#SPJ12

The expression is rationalize to give C  \(= \frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}\)

From the information given, we have that the surd form is expressed as;

C=\((\frac{E}m} )^(^1^/^2^)\)

This is represented as;

C =\(= \frac{\sqrt{E} }{\sqrt{m} }\)

We need to know that the process of simplifying a fraction by removing surds (such as square roots or cube roots) from its denominator is known as rationalization of surds. A common approach involves selecting a conjugate expression that can remove the irrational surd by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator.

Then, we have;

C = \(= \frac{\sqrt{E} * \sqrt{m} }{\sqrt{m} * \sqrt{m} }\)

multiply the values, we have;

C = \(\frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}\)

Learn more about surds at: https://brainly.com/question/840021

#SPJ4

The amount earned is $88,709.68

It is a payroll tax that is paid on wages earned by employees.

We have,

We will assume the current Social Security tax rate for employees as 6.2%.

Now,

The amount earned.

= 5,500 / 6.2%

= 5500 / 0.062

= $88,709.68

Thus,

The amount earned is $88,709.68

Learn more about social security tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/18268724

#SPJ1

Answer: 4a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4a

Step-by-step explanation:

8 of something minus 4 of something gives you 4 of that thing

For the given Rayleigh distribution with \(f(x)= 2axe^{-ax^{2} }\) , the expected value is E[X] = sqrt(pi/(4a)), and the variance is Var[X] = (2 - π/(2a²)).

the Rayleigh distribution is characterized by a probability density function (PDF) of the form \(f(x)= 2axe^{-ax^{2} }\), where a > 0. This distribution is used to model the magnitude of a two-dimensional vector whose components are independently and identically distributed Gaussian random variables.

For the Rayleigh distribution with the PDF \(f(x)= 2axe^{-ax^{2} }\) , the expected value (mean) is E[X] = sqrt(pi/(4a)), and the variance is :

Var[X] = (2 - pi/2a²).

Now, let's explain the answer in detail. To find the expected value, we integrate the product of the random variable X and its PDF over the range of possible values:

\(E[x] = \int\limits {(0 to a)x* 2axe^{-ax^{2} }} \, dx\)

By substituting u = -ax², du = -2ax dx, the integral becomes:

E[X] = ∫(0 to ∞) -ueⁿ du

Using integration by parts, we have:

E[X] = [-ueⁿ] - ∫(-eⁿ du)

= \([-xe^{-ax^{2}](0 to a) - \int\limits {0 to a}e^{-ax^{2} }\, dx }\)

The first term evaluates to 0 at both limits. The second term can be rewritten as:

E[X] = ∫(0 to ∞) e⁻ᵃˣ² dx

= √(π/4a) (by evaluating the Gaussian integral)

Thus, the expected value of X is E[X] = sqrt(pi/(4a)).

Next, to find the variance, we use the formula Var[X] = E[X²] - (E[X])². First, we calculate E[X²]:

E[X²] = ∫(0 to ∞) x² * 2axe⁻ᵃˣ²) dx

= ∫(0 to ∞) -x * d(e^(-ax²))

= [-x * e^(-ax²)](0 to ∞) + ∫(0 to ∞) e⁽⁻ᵃˣ²⁾ dx

The first term evaluates to 0 at both limits. The second term is the same as the integral calculated for E[X]. Hence:

= √(π/4a)

Substituting the values into the variance formula:

Var[X] = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2

= (√(π/4a)) - (sqrt(pi/(4a)))²

= (2 - π/(2a²))

Thus, the variance of X is Var[X] = (2 - π/(2a^2)).

Therefore, for the given Rayleigh distribution with f(x) = 2axe⁽⁻ᵃˣ²⁾,

the expected value is E[X] = sqrt(pi/(4a)), and the variance is Var[X] = (2 - π/(2a²)).

Complete Question:

A random variable X has a Rayleigh distribution if its probability density is given by f(x) = 2oxe or for x > 0, where a > 0. Show that for this distribution 1. Al l vandle has a Rayleigh distribution if its probability density i f(x) = 2axe-ar' for I > 0, where a > 0. Show that for this distribution a) The expected value is b) The variance is o? = (1-5)

Learn more about Variance:

brainly.com/question/32159408

#SPJ11

An equation highlighting the discount: y = (65 - 7)x

A simpler equation: y = 58x

The conclusion about the relationship between age and income is that there is no specific or direct relationship between age and income. Income can vary greatly across different age groups, and age alone is not a reliable predictor of income.

When considering the relationship between age and income, it is important to understand that age alone does not determine a person's income level. While it is true that individuals generally accumulate more work experience and potentially higher income as they grow older, there are many other factors at play. Income is influenced by various factors such as education, occupation, skills, industry, location, and individual choices.

For example, two individuals of the same age may have vastly different incomes based on their education levels. Education has a stronger correlation with income than age alone. Higher education typically leads to increased earning potential and access to higher-paying job opportunities. However, it is important to note that even within similar education levels, income can still vary based on other factors mentioned earlier.

Therefore, it is crucial to consider a multitude of factors when examining the relationship between age and income. Age alone does not provide a reliable basis for predicting or determining someone's income level, as it is influenced by a wide range of individual circumstances and external factors.

Learn more about factors here:

https://brainly.com/question/29128446

#SPJ11