No, it is not correct to say that the Khumalos have a personal right over the homestead. The right of habitatio that was reserved in their favour was limited to their lifetime and was attached to the smaller homestead on the farm, not to the farm itself.
A personal right is one that is "available against a specific person, and not against the world at large, and is limited in duration and extent to the life or other legal personality of the holder thereof," according to the court in Hendricks v. Road Accident Fund (paragraph 31).
The habitatio reserved in favour of the Khumalos was a genuine, time-limited right that was affixed to a specific piece of immovable property rather than a personal right.
Therefore, the Khumalos cannot assert sovereignty over the homestead by relying on a personal right.
For such more question on Khumalos:
https://brainly.com/question/31223365
#SPJ11
What were two concerns held by attorneys that would lead them to talk to jurors about the csi effect?
Concerns held by attorneys that would lead them to talk to jurors about the CSI effect The CSI effect is prosecutors' notion that crime packages are skewing jurors' courtroom expectancies, in the end making it more difficult to win their instances and convict defendants.
The “CSI impact” turned into first described within the media as a phenomenon because viewing forensics and crime is primarily based on television suggests. This impact impacts jurors to have unrealistic expectancies of forensic science all through a crook trial and has an effect on jurors' decisions within the conviction or acquittal technique.
The CSI effect refers to television suggests like CSI: Crime Scene research, regulation & Order, and forty-eight Hours thriller, and the effect they have on jurors. it is said that jurors who watch those sorts of indicates may additionally region a heavy emphasis on forensic technology in a case.
Learn more about CSI here:
https://brainly.com/question/17446086
#SPJ4
A state legislature received complaints from traffic accident victims who, in the days immediately following their accidents, had received unwelcome and occasionally misleading telephone calls on behalf of medical care providers. The callers warned of the risks of not obtaining prompt medical evaluation to detect injuries resulting from accidents and offered free examinations to determine whether the victims had suffered any compensable injuries. In response to these complaints, the legislature enacted a law prohibiting medical care providers from soliciting any accident victim by telephone within 30 days of his or her accident. Which of the following arguments would be most helpful to the state in defending the constitutionality of the law?
a. Because the law regulates only commercial speech, the state need only demonstrate that the restriction is rationally related to achieving the state's legitimate interests in protecting the privacy of accident victims and in regulating the medical profession.
b. The law is a reasonable time, place, and manner regulation.
c. The state has substantial interests in protecting the privacy of accident victims and in regulating the practice of medical care providers, and the law is narrowly tailored to achieve the state's objectives.
d. Because the commercial speech that is the subject of this law includes some speech that is misleading, the First Amendment does not limit the power of the state to regulate that speech.
The correct option is option (c), i.e., The state has substantial interests in protecting the privacy of accident victims and in regulating the practice of medical care providers, and the law is narrowly tailored to achieve the state's objectives.
Why is confidentiality important to victims?
When the anonymity of their information is guaranteed, victims of violence are more likely to seek out help and reveal the true nature of the abuse or attack they have endured. This enables efficient, individualized advocacy planning and responses.
Why is it important for the government to make laws protecting the victims as well as the witnesses of a crime?
For successful criminal trials to take place and for organized criminal groups to be destroyed, victims' and witnesses' cooperation is essential. However, getting such cooperation is one of the difficulties that many criminal justice systems encounter in the investigation and prosecution of crime.
Learn more about Right to privacy: https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ4
Rufus is playing soccer with his friends after school. rufus pushes samantha while chasing the soccer ball as part of the game. samantha falls and sprains her wrist. rufus also intentionally kicks bethany while she is lying on the ground after a play has finished. rufus was mad that she had scored a goal on him earlier in the game. alex yells at rufus to get himself under control, and rufus responds by trying to punch alex with a closed fist. who can and cannot bring a successful lawsuit against rufus for battery? how about assault? please define the torts of assault and battery in your answer.
In this scenario, the torts of assault and battery are involved. Assault refers to the intentional act of causing apprehension or fear of harmful or offensive contact in another person.
Battery, on the other hand, involves the intentional and harmful or offensive physical contact with another person without their consent.Based on the information provided, Samantha, Bethany, and Alex can potentially bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for both assault and battery.Samantha can bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for battery because he intentionally pushed her, causing her to fall and sprain her wrist. This constitutes harmful physical contact without her consent.Bethany can also bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for battery because he intentionally kicked her while she was lying on the ground. Again, this constitutes harmful physical contact without her consent.
Alex, on the other hand, can bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for assault but not battery. When Rufus tried to punch Alex, he caused apprehension or fear of harmful or offensive contact. However, since Rufus did not make actual physical contact with Alex, battery is not applicable.It's important to note that the success of these lawsuits may vary depending on the jurisdiction and other factors. It's advisable for the parties involved to consult with a legal professional for accurate advice specific to their situation.
To know more about apprehension visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32224854?
#SPJ11
What is advancements can be made to improve on your chosen area going forward for the next 20 years. For SAFTEY IN CORRECTIONS
The advancements that can be made to improve your chosen area going forward for the next 20 years are known by research into the missing links in your field.
This is further explained below.
What is your chosen area of study?Generally, Your field of study should ideally be relevant to your intended future career path and be capable of making a possible contribution to the realization of your desired professional outcomes.
Many students tend to grossly underestimate how important it is to identify a pertinent study subject that is suitable for their dissertation. It is not possible to make a hasty choice about this matter.
In conclusion, Research into the gaps that exist in your industry has shown the potential improvements that may be made to your chosen sector moving ahead over the next 20 years.
Read more about your area of study
https://brainly.com/question/13175153
#SPJ1
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
How many of the original thirteen states must ratify/approve the constitution for it to take effect?.
The process set out in the Constitution for its ratification provided for much popular debate in the States. The Constitution would take effect once it had been ratified by nine of the thirteen State legislatures; unanimity was not required.
The charter now not simplest designed a government however additionally located limits on it to prevent arbitrary rule. especially through its amendments, the constitution guarantees every American essential rights and safety of lifestyle, liberty, and assets.
The charter of America is the splendid law of the united states of us. It outdated the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution. at the start comprising seven articles, it delineates the country-wide frame of government.
A change can be proposed via a two-thirds vote of each house of the constitution, or, if -thirds of the States request one, via a conference known for that reason. The modification has to then be ratified by way of three-fourths of the state legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in every kingdom for ratification.
Learn more about Constitution here https://brainly.com/question/16385413
#SPJ4
Discuss the functions of law?
Answer:
The four primary functions of law – preventing undesirable behaviour and securing desirable behaviour which is performed in criminal law and torts; providing facilities for private arrangements between individuals, which is found in private law, criminal, and tort law; provisions of services and the redistribution of goods found in legal systems; and settling unregulated disputes found in courts and tribunals – are discussed in the chapter. It also tackles the secondary and indirect functions of the law. The secondary functions of the law include the determination of procedures for changing the law and the regulation of the operation of law-applying organs. The c
Explain how information about public opinion is gathered
Lyn is injured when a part of a roller coasterbreaks free and strikes her while standing in line. If Lyn brings a successful tort action against the amusement park, she may be awarded special damages to compensate her for Group of answer choices nonmonetary aspects of the harm suffered, such as pain and suffering. egregious or reprehensible conduct by the defendant. monetary losses, such as medical expenses. all of the choices.
If Lyn is successful in her tort action against the amusement park, she may be awarded special damages to compensate for nonmonetary aspects of the harm suffered, such as pain and suffering, as well as monetary losses like medical expenses.
Special damages are also known as compensatory damages, which are designed to compensate the plaintiff for their actual losses resulting from the defendant's wrongdoing.
In this scenario, Lyn was standing in line for a roller coaster when she was hit by a part of the ride that broke free. This incident caused her physical injuries, as well as emotional distress and trauma. As a result, she may be entitled to special damages to compensate for her pain and suffering and any related medical expenses.
The awarding of special damages in a tort action is typically based on the extent of the harm suffered by the plaintiff, as well as the degree of negligence or wrongful conduct on the part of the defendant. In cases where the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious or reprehensible, punitive damages may also be awarded to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future.
Overall, if Lyn brings a successful tort action against the amusement park, she may be able to recover both special and general damages, depending on the circumstances of the case. This can include compensation for nonmonetary harm, such as pain and suffering, as well as monetary losses like medical expenses and lost wages.
learn more about nonmonetary here
https://brainly.com/question/32632724
#SPJ11
What important rule was introduced in 1954 to speed up the tempo of the game?
Answer:
the clara clarckston rule
Explanation:
Answer:
Then in 1954, the 24-second shot clock was introduced. This was done to increase the speed of the game, by forcing the team with the basketball to shoot the ball before the 24-second timer is up. Finally, the NBA introduced the three-point line, in the 1979-1980 season.
Gilbert wants to initiate a suit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint. The complaint should include
The thing which the complaint should include is b. a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
What is a Lawsuit?This refers to the class action that is filed by a person or company against another in a law court, seeking redress.
Hence, we can see that based on the tenets of law, if Gilbert wants to initiate a lawsuit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint, he should include a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
Read more about lawsuits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1184001
#SPJ1
State the title of the case (e.g., Hampton v. United States).
Did you have probable cause to approach the defendant while he was parked at the traffic light? Why or why not? Defend your answer.
Was the entrapment defense valid in this case? Why or why not? Defend your answer.
Is providing the opportunity for someone to commit a crime the same as entrapment? Why or why not?
The title of the case is Smith v. State, and it involves the legality of approaching the defendant while he was parked at a traffic light without probable cause. Additionally, it explores whether the entrapment defense is valid in this case and whether providing the opportunity for someone to commit a crime is equivalent to entrapment.
In this case, it can be argued that there was no probable cause to approach the defendant while he was parked at the traffic light. Probable cause is typically required for law enforcement officers to initiate contact with individuals, such as conducting a search or seizure.
If there were no observable factors or reasonable suspicions that warranted such contact, the approach may be deemed unjustified. However, the specific circumstances surrounding the encounter would need to be examined to determine whether probable cause existed.Regarding the entrapment defense, its validity depends on whether the defendant was induced or coerced into committing a crime he would not have otherwise committed. Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers engage in conduct that creates a substantial risk of inducing a person to commit a crime they were not predisposed to commit. To determine the validity of the defense, the defendant's susceptibility to entrapment, his pre-existing intent, and the actions of the law enforcement officers must be thoroughly evaluated.Providing the opportunity for someone to commit a crime is not the same as entrapment. Merely presenting an opportunity or facilitating an environment for a crime to occur does not constitute entrapment if the individual already had a predisposition or intent to commit the crime.Entrapment involves inducing or persuading a person to commit a crime they would not have committed otherwise, whereas providing an opportunity does not involve active inducement or persuasion. The distinction lies in the presence or absence of coercive or manipulative tactics employed by law enforcement to lead an otherwise unwilling person into committing a crime.
For more questions on entrapment
https://brainly.com/question/32397918
#SPJ8
Given that our scale is 1"=1'
How long would a line on your scale sketch be to represent a wall that is 10' long?
what US Supreme Court case decided that the death penalty itself did NOT violate the Constitution?
Answer: Gregg v. Georgia
Explanation:
A plaintiff sued a defendant for battery. At trial, the plaintiff's witness testified that the defendant had made an unprovoked attack on the plaintiff. On cross examination, the defendant asks the witness about a false claim that the witness had once filed on an insurance policy.
The question is:________
Answer: It is a proper question
Explanation:
The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.
In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.
what is school based assessment
Answer:
a test of your school knowledge
Explanation:
A school based assessment is a process that requires the teachers to mark their students' work for fair assessment of their periodic performance.
The assessment is used as a information to increase students learning and development
In conclusion, the school based assessment is important because its allows to assess the performance of students.
Read more about school based assessment
brainly.com/question/26921511
Which of the following statements best describes how operational commanders are setting up their subordinates for success?
By establishing command relationships that promote synergy among the components, instill a one-team/one-fight mentality, and provide authorities commensurate with responsibilities
By understanding that all agencies, intergovernmental organizations, and nongovernmental organizations have their own languages
By acknowledging information and coordination "voids" at the GCC and JTF headquarters
By creating an environment of inclusiveness in order to understand the complex problem space
By establishing command relationships that promote synergy among the components, instill a one-team/one-fight mentality, and provide authorities commensurate with responsibilities.
Operational commanders aim to foster an environment where different components work together seamlessly, promoting collaboration and synergy among the various units or organizations involved. They strive to instill a unified mindset, emphasizing the importance of teamwork and shared goals. This helps in creating a cohesive and effective force. Additionally, commanders ensure that their subordinates are granted appropriate authorities that align with their responsibilities, empowering them to make informed decisions and take necessary actions.
By establishing these command relationships, promoting unity of effort, and delegating suitable authorities, operational commanders enhance the chances of success for their subordinates in executing complex missions or operations.
To know more about Operational commanders, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31754943
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANKS
Income tax - 20%
Property tax - 2%
Sales Tax - 8%
Frank Ramos
Occupation - Dentist
Annual Salary - $78,000
Recently purchased $500 tablet for his sons birthday, a 10$ collar for his dog and 20$ pizza buffet lunch for his family
owns a $240,000 home
What are Franks property taxes for this year?
You are approaching an intersection and are preparing to turn right with a green light. You should slow down, signal your turn and
Answer: look both sides before taking the turn
Explanation:
Which statement explains the way historical events affected the development of values in American society?
American society is made up of people who can look back on events in U.S. history.
American national history covers many subjects, including the topic of American society.
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
The experience that comes from reading history has been valuable to many people in America.
Answer:
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
What is subject matter jurisdiction?
a. It is a type of jurisdiction that concerns civilian and non-civilian courts on the federal level.
b. It is a type of jurisdiction which determine where the appropriate court is physically located.
c. It is the type of jurisdiction that determine who can be a party in a particular court.
d. It is the type of jurisdiction that determines what type of cases courts can hear.
Subject matter jurisdiction is the type of jurisdiction that determines what type of cases courts can hear. Option D.
What is subject matter jurisdiction?Subject matter jurisdiction is the type of jurisdiction that determines what type of cases courts can hear. It refers to the authority of a court to hear cases involving a specific subject matter, such as contracts, family law, or property disputes.
Subject matter jurisdiction also determines the types of claims and defenses that can be raised in a lawsuit. For example, a court with jurisdiction over contract disputes cannot hear cases involving personal injury claims.
Thus, subject matter jurisdiction is essential in ensuring that cases are heard in the appropriate court.
Hence, the correct answer is option D.
Read more about Lawsuits at https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
50. If the solid yellow line is on your right, you are driving:
A.
in a safe manner
B.
on the correct side of the road
C.
on the wrong side of the road
If the solid yellow line is on your right, you're driving: A. in a secure manner
Driving is the controlled operation and movement of an automobile, such as vehicles, bikes, vans, buses, and bicycles. Permission to drive on public highways is granted based totally on a fixed of situations being met and drivers are required to observe the installed avenue and traffic legal guidelines within the region they are driving.
Definition of driving: communicating force a using wheel. b: exerting pressure on a user to have an effect. 2a: having extraordinary pressure a riding rain a driving beat. b: acting with vigor: lively a hard-using worker.
The motive of driving. riding serves many functions. At its most fundamental degree, using a motor automobile is a reliable, green, and inexpensive mode of shipping. using a vehicle may be as smooth as going for walks or strolling once you get cozy at the back of the wheel. For this, you want to practice difficult, keep in thought all the guidelines and traffic laws and familiarize yourself well with the vehicle.
Learn more about driving here: https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ9
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
Which of the following is the most rapid acting and produces the most immediate effect?
Intravenous drug administration method is the most rapid acting and produces the most immediate effect.
Intravenous administration gives an ideal route for the infusion of highly concentrated, sulfuric, and irritant solutions. The blood will buffer and rapidly help spread substances.
An intravenous (IV) injection or infusion is one that is administered directly into your vein via a needle or tube. In fact, the word “intravenous” implies “into the vein.”
With IV administration, a small plastic tube called an IV catheter is embedded into your vein. The catheter enables your healthcare provider to administer multiple safe doses of medication to you without having to poke you with a needle each time.
To know more about drug administration, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12015701
#SPJ4
Elaborate the functions of the three-tiered federal court system.
Answer:
The U.S. has a three-tiered structure of courts. The first one or the first level is trial courts. There is the Supreme Court on the second level, and the third level is the federal court. Trial courts or the federal courts look into the state matters dealing with the general public, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, is the highest court of the country, and the federal court is the court to hear the matters of the constitution.
Explanation:
District Courts and Circuit Courts
District courts are the primary or level 1 of the federal court system; the purpose of the district court is to settle the disputes of different states. Also, it is the first place of appeal. They function to deal with civil and criminal cases.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the only institution where the cases can be challenged after being heard in the circuit courts and district courts. There is only one Supreme Court, and it is of the highest order. The Supreme Court can decide on all the matters concerning civil or state.
Federal Court
Federal court works for the matters of the state. Federal courts take into account only the matters concerning the legislature and high officials. They help the state to deal with the matters of the legislation separately.
-Hope this helps <3
in order to get around the need for senate approval of treaties, many contemporary presidents have made use of _____ in foreign affairs. group of answer choices executive agreements international protocols executive immunity signing statements
Many presidents in the modern era have used executive agreements in international diplomacy to avoid the requirement that treaties be approved by the senate.
What do treaties entail?Treaties are pacts made by states. They might be multilateral, involving many nations, or bilateral, involving just two. The fact that treaties are enforceable (i.e., breaching them has legal repercussions) and are a component of international law are their main characteristics.
What do you name a treaty?An international agreement, convention, covenant, treaty, pact, or interchange of letters are some additional names for a treaty. Under international law, treaties are, however, just agreements that have legal force and effect for the parties.
to know more about treaties visit:
https://brainly.com/question/907952
#SPJ4
What is Judicial Review? Describe it in detail, please.
Answer:
the Judaical review is a power of the courts of a country to examine the actions of the legislative, executive and administrative arms of the government. it determines whether actions are consistent and also with the constitution actions that are judged and considered inconsistent are declared unconstitutional and are null and void.
Explanation: hope this helps :)
at what point in the overall process do judges decide whether or not they will be sending a suspect your way?
Judges decide a range of cases that come earlier than the courts, which includes civil suits, crook cases and household law matters.
When there is no jury, judges… Judges also make sure that instances are conducted following the rules of court docket and the rules dealing with proof that can be used.
Do judges decide instances on the foundation of what they in my view suppose is right?Our personal opinions or public sentiment about the deserves or morality of certain laws simply are now not factors in judicial decision making. We are charged to interpret the legal guidelines and to defend the constitutional rights of all citizens, regardless of power or position.
Learn more about judges decision here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338#SPJ4laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation.
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2