Answer:
Explanation:
In 1774, the Continental Congress decided to fight back together if British troops used force against the colonies. The Continental Congress was a body of representatives from the 13 colonies that was formed to address the colonies' grievances with the British government and to coordinate a response to British actions. In 1774, the Continental Congress adopted the "Declaration of Rights and Grievances," which outlined the colonies' grievances with the British government and asserted the colonies' rights as Englishmen. In the event that British troops used force against the colonies, the Continental Congress resolved to resist and fight back together in order to protect the colonies' rights and liberties.
B.Fight back together
According to Erasmus, how are monks behaving in ways contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ?
Answer:
They are filthy, ignorant, and love wine and women.
Explanation:
In his book titled "The Praise of Folly" which was written in 1509. Erasmus criticizes different classes of people in society. Including them were the monks.
According to Erasmus, monks are behaving in ways contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ. Based on the fact that during his time monks are ignorant, "They cannot read, and so they consider it the height of piety to have no contact with literature..."
At the same time, they're filthy "Most of them capitalize on their dirt and poverty by whining for food from door to door.."
They also love wine and women, "The monks of certain orders recoil in horror from money, as if it were poison, but not from wine or women."
what activity were passenger Indians involved in. In the early days of south africa
Answer:
The feature on Indian South Africans forms part of our larger feature on the ... as indentured workers in 1860 and later as 'free' or 'passenger' Indians. ... After serving their indentures, the first category of Indians were free to remain in ... Africans · Indian immigrants engaged in non-sugar growing activities ...
Explanation:
The United States Senator who led the noninterventionists in Congress and called for neutrality legislation in the 1930s was FILL IN THE BLANK. A. Gerald P. Nye
The United States Senator who led the noninterventionists in Congress and called for neutrality legislation in the 1930s was Senators William Edgar Borah, Arthur H. Vandenberg, Gerald P. Nye and Robert M. La Follette, Jr. That was the starting point of Neutrality Acts of the 1930s.
What is Neutrality Acts?The Neutrality Acts are a series of laws passed by the United States Congress in 1935, 1936, 1937, and 1939 in response to the threat and increased warfare leading to World War II. Spurred on by increased isolationism and non-interventionism in the United States after its entry into World War I, they aimed to keep the United States from re-engaging in foreign conflicts. rice field.
The legacy of the Neutrality Act was generally negative because it made no distinction between aggressor and victim, treated them both as equals as belligerents, and limited the US government's ability to assist Britain and France against Nazi Germany. regarded as a thing. The law was largely repealed in 1941 in the face of increased incidents between German U-boats and U.S. ships during the Battle of the Atlantic and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
Learn more about Neutrality Acts https://brainly.com/question/9502726
#SPJ4
*the question above should not need to include a sentence "FILL IN THE BLANK" if there are other choices then include those choices to the question. Thank you
50 POINTSS i will give brainlest to best helper:
Write a 200 word essay about genghis khan
Answer:
Explanation:
Genghis Khan[note 4] (born Temüjin,[note 1] c. 1158 – August 18, 1227), was the founder and first Great Khan (Emperor) of the Mongol Empire, which became the largest contiguous empire in history after his death. He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of Northeast Asia. After founding the Empire and being proclaimed Genghis Khan (an honorary title ascending possibly from the Turkic "tengiz" — sea,[10] meaning "the oceanic, universal ruler"), he launched the Mongol invasions that conquered most of Eurasia, reaching as far west as Poland in Europe and the Levant in the Middle East. Campaigns initiated in his lifetime include those against the Qara Khitai, Khwarezmia, and the Western Xia and Jin dynasties, and raids into Medieval Georgia, the Kievan Rus', and Volga Bulgaria. These campaigns were often accompanied by large-scale massacres of the civilian populations, especially in the Khwarazmian and Western Xia-controlled lands. Because of this brutality, which left millions dead, he is considered by many to have been a brutal ruler. By the end of his life, the Mongol Empire occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia and China. Due to his exceptional military successes, Genghis Khan is often considered to be the greatest conqueror of all time.[11]
Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned Ögedei Khan as his successor. Later his grandsons split his empire into khanates.[12] Genghis Khan died in 1227 after defeating the Western Xia. By his request, his body was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia.[13] His descendants extended the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering or creating vassal states in all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and substantial portions of Eastern Europe and Southwest Asia. Many of these invasions repeated the earlier large-scale slaughters of local populations. As a result, Genghis Khan and his empire have a fearsome reputation in local histories.[14]
Beyond his military accomplishments, Genghis Khan also advanced the Mongol Empire in other ways. He decreed the adoption of the Uyghur script as the Mongol Empire's writing system. He also practised meritocracy and encouraged religious tolerance in the Mongol Empire, unifying the nomadic tribes of Northeast Asia. Present-day Mongolians regard him as the founding father of Mongolia.[15] He is also credited with bringing the Silk Road under one cohesive political environment. This brought relatively easy communication and trade between Northeast Asia, Muslim Southwest Asia, and Christian Europe, expanding the cultural horizons of all three areas.
How did France’s First Constitution echo the moderate voices of the National Assembly?
France’s First Constitution echoed the moderate voices of the National Assembly because it retained the monarchy, but sovereignty effectively resided in the Legislative Assembly, which was elected by a system of indirect voting.
What is the French constitution of 1791 about?The first constitution of France was created in during the French revolution by the National Assembly. The constitution was created in such a way that the monarchy was retained however power belonged to the legislative assembly.
This was unique at that time because the legislative assembly were elected through indirect voting. The constitution of 1791 was designed to address some of the anomalies that bedeviled the France at that time.
Some of these include;
The feudal system was abolished and limited the powers of the king.The king came under the supervision of the government, and France became a constitutional monarchy. The nobles and the clergy were stripped off of their privileges.This constitution therefore made France a Constitutional Monarchy
Learn more about the France constitution at https://brainly.com/question/1017853
#SPJ1
Which person attended the inaugural world congress of sports event 21 years ago as a student intern and participated this time as a league executive?.
Answer:
Explanation:
Which person attended the inaugural world congress of sports event 21 years ago as a student intern and participated this time as a league executive?.
What did king george do to english colonists in the new world that violated the principles of the magna carta?.
The king acted, alongside Parliament, to deprive the colonists of their rights. Therefore, the colonists had the proper to withdraw their consent to be governed via way of means by the king. The colonists have been loose to set up their personal government.
The Magna Carta Libertatum, generally referred to as the Magna Carta, changed into a constitution of royal rights agreed to via way of means of King John of England at Runnymede, close to Windsor, on 15 June 1215. First drafted via way of means of the Archbishop. Canterbury column, Cardinal Stephen Langton, for peace. among the unpopular king and a collection of rebellious barons, he promised to shield the hobbies of the church, shield the barons from unlawful imprisonment, briefly get the right of entry to justice, and restrictions at the charge of feudal rights to the Crown, to be made via way of means of a council of 25 barons.
After John's death, the regent government of his younger son, Henry III, re-issued the record in 1216, stripping it of a number of its greater radical content, in an unsuccessful try to benefit political guide for his or her cause. When the struggle are led to 1217, it changed into a part of a peace treaty made at Lambeth, in which the record received the name "Magna Carta", to differentiate it from the smaller Forest Charter posted across the equal time point.
Learn more about the Magna Carta here: https://brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ4
PLSSSSSS HELPPPPP IVE BEEN TRYING TO FIGURE THIS OUT FOR MINUTES
How did American government play a role in the economic growth
Answer:
The government is like the regions money leader they can decide what to do with the money
They played an enormous role in the economy because they can choose what the citizens shall do with their money and control it.
thank you have an amazing day
(pls vote me braniest spent forever on this)
how do you think the first Americans made it to North America?
Answer:
If you are talking about the Native Americans, some historians believe that the first Native Americans came to North America through Asia, through a sliver of land that connected Asia and present-day Alaska called the Bering Land Bridge.
Explanation:
What is the difference between how the authors of “Tubman on the 20!” and “Who’s in Your Wallet? (And How’d He Get There?)” present the Department of the Treasury?
A.The author of “Tubman on the 20!” suggests the Treasury only acts after intense public pressure, while the author of “Who’s in Your Wallet? (And How’d He Get There?)” explains how consistently responsive the Treasury is to public opinion.
B.The author of “Tubman on the 20!” uses the Treasury as an example of support for the representation of women, while the author of “Who’s in Your Wallet? (And How’d He Get There?)” claims that the Treasury is a hindrance to women’s representation.
C.The author of “Tubman on the 20!” describes the Treasury as a powerful force only during Jackson’s time, while the author of “Who’s in Your Wallet? (And How’d He Get There?)” presents the Treasury as powerful today.
D.
The author of “Tubman on the 20!” describes the Treasury as slowed down by the courts, while the author of “Who’s in Your Wallet? (And How’d He Get There?)” describes the Treasury as intentionally ignoring the will of the people.
How did the Civil War transform the United States and the people living in it?
The Civil War transformed the United States by preserving the Union, abolishing slavery, centralizing power, driving industrialization, and bringing about social changes.
The Civil War had a profound impact on the United States. It ensured the preservation of the Union by establishing federal authority over state governments. The war also led to the abolition of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment, fundamentally transforming the nation's social and moral landscape.
Furthermore, the conflict resulted in a centralization of power, with the federal government gaining more authority and influence. This shift laid the foundation for a stronger and more unified nation.
Economically, the Civil War accelerated industrialization and technological advancements as the demands of war production fueled innovation. This set the stage for the nation's future industrial expansion and economic growth.
The war also exacted a significant human toll, causing immense loss of life and suffering. It impacted families and communities across the country, leaving a lasting impact on the collective memory of the nation.
Following the war, efforts were made to reconstruct the South and address civil rights issues, but progress was slow and complicated. The post-war era witnessed social changes, including advancements in women's rights and the ongoing struggle for racial equality.
In summary, the Civil War was a transformative event in American history, with wide-ranging consequences that reshaped the nation politically, socially, and economically.
learn more about industrialization here:
https://brainly.com/question/32029094
#SPJ11
Help please ( gives 25 points)
Answer:
they were worried about conflict between the Colonist and the Natives
Explanation:
Im not 100% sure but i think thats it
Answer:
b
Explanation:
a) Explain why Bank of England's intervention during the September 1992 was described as "too little, too late". Explain why this directly led to 1992 British exchange rate fiasco? b) Required: b) Discuss speculators' role in this incident?
Bank of England's intervention during September 1992 was described as "too little, too late" because it was done without adequate preparation to stabilize the pound.
a) In September 1992, the Bank of England tried to hold down the value of the pound by raising interest rates to 15%. This move, however, proved to be too late and too little. Soros, together with other speculators, kept selling pounds, and as the market confidence in the British government's ability to stabilize the pound deteriorated, the value of the pound continued to fall. The bank's tactics of raising interest rates to attract foreign investment, coupled with its poor coordination, created a currency crisis in the country.
Speculators played a significant role in the 1992 British exchange rate fiasco by selling large quantities of pounds. The speculators' relentless selling of the pound resulted in the currency's value plummeting, making it more expensive for the Bank of England to purchase it. The Bank of England's actions were unable to counteract the speculators' momentum, and the UK was forced to withdraw from the ERM after the pound was effectively devalued.
To know more about Bank of England, visit
https://brainly.com/question/30828091
#SPJ11
What event led the United States to enter World War II?
• the attack on Pearl Harbor
• the blockade of Panama
• the capture of Hawaii
• the invasion of France
the goal of the sncc was to defeat white ___ and to obtain ___.
The goal of the SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) was to defeat white segregationists and to obtain civil rights and equality for African Americans.
The SNCC was a prominent organization during the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. Founded in 1960, the SNCC aimed to combat racial segregation and discrimination through nonviolent means. Their primary focus was on mobilizing young African American students to challenge the oppressive systems in place.
The SNCC's objective was to dismantle the social, political, and economic structures that enforced racial inequality. They actively participated in voter registration drives, sit-ins, freedom rides, and other forms of nonviolent protests to challenge segregationist policies and practices. Their work was instrumental in raising awareness about systemic racism and advocating for civil rights legislation.
The SNCC played a crucial role in organizing grassroots movements and empowering local communities to demand equal rights and opportunities. They worked alongside other civil rights organizations, such as the NAACP and CORE, to challenge segregationist policies and advocate for voting rights, desegregation, and equal access to education, employment, and public facilities.
In conclusion, the goal of the SNCC was to defeat white segregationists and to obtain civil rights and equality for African Americans. Their tireless efforts and commitment to nonviolent direct action were instrumental in shaping the Civil Rights Movement and advancing the cause of racial justice in the United States.
know more about Civil Rights Movement here;
https://brainly.com/question/4214049
#SPJ11
TO
K
on a
war
4. Close reading: Re-read the last two paragraphs of the 1917 speech. Why do you think
Wilson added these paragraphs? How do you think these words made Americans feel?
The last two paragraphs of the 1917 speech delivered by President Woodrow Wilson are as follows:
"We are accepting this challenge of hostile purpose because we know that in such a government, following such methods, we can never have a friend; and that in the presence of its organized power, always lying in wait to accomplish we know not what purpose, there can be no assured security for the democratic governments of the world. We are now about to accept gauge of battle with this natural foe to liberty and shall, if necessary, spend the whole force of the nation to check and nullify its pretensions and its power. We are glad, now that we see the facts with no veil of false pretense about them, to fight thus for the ultimate peace of the world and for the liberation of its peoples, the German peoples included: for the rights of nations great and small and the privilege of men everywhere to choose their way of life and of obedience. The world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek no indemnities for ourselves, no material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. We shall be satisfied when those rights have been made as secure as the faith and the freedom of nations can make them."
What is the 1917 speech.?Generally, It is likely that Wilson added these paragraphs to emphasize the reasons for the United States' entry into World War I and to rally the American people to support the war effort. By clearly stating that the United States was fighting for democracy and the rights of all nations and peoples, Wilson sought to create a sense of purpose and unity among Americans and to assure them that the sacrifices they would make in the war were for a just and noble cause.
These words probably made Americans feel proud and patriotic and may have strengthened their resolve to support the war effort. By emphasizing that the United States was not seeking selfish ends or material gain, but was fighting to ensure the peace and security of the world, Wilson likely appealed to Americans' sense of justice and altruism. The idea that the United States was fighting for the rights of all peoples, including the German people, may also have helped to counter anti-German sentiment and emphasize the universality of democratic values.
Overall, these words likely helped to build support for the war effort among the American people, and to emphasize the importance of the United States' role in shaping the future of the world.
Read more about the 1917 speech.
https://brainly.com/question/30418572
#SPJ1
Why did early humans first domesticate animals during the Neolithic
Age?
Answer: Because they were at a lower level of intellectual development in the previous period, the Paleolithic.
Explanation:
Humans domesticated the first plant and animal species during the Neolithic. The dog, wheat, and pig are the first species that humans have domesticated. In this way, the lifestyle completely changed. People no longer lived a nomadic lifestyle, tied to one area and formed the first social communities. So in the Neolithic, the human race began to develop more intensively.
Answer:
the correct answer is D
Explanation:
How did Constantine change Roman culture and law after he moved the capital to Byzantium?
O He promoted Latin as the primary language.
O He prohibited the Christian religion in the empire.
O He welcomed the Gothic tribes into the Eastern Roman Empire
O He kept many Roman laws, but gave the military more power.
Save and Eyit
why did the rwandan genocide happen
Answer:
It was an intentional attempt to get rid an entire race. Many Hutus and a majority of important government officials came to the conclusion that the real problem was Rwanda's Tutsi minority. They trained and organized armed paramilitary gangs to kill Tutsi civilians.
Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.
On the map above, country J is __________.
A.
Kenya
B.
Nigeria
C.
South Africa
D.
Somalia
Answer:
it is south africa
Explanation:
I took the test
I need help with this.
1. The political cartoon represents the conflict in Korea during the Cold War by using symbolism to convey the power struggle between the two superpowers involved, the United States and the Soviet Union.
2. The person holding the gun in the political cartoon would likely represent the United Nations forces, particularly those led by the United States.
Analyzing the political cartoonThe Korean War during the Cold War is shown in the political cartoon. Russia (Soviet Union) is shown as a bear using symbolism to symbolize their aggressive expansionist goals. The bear attacking Korea is a representation of Soviet involvement in the conflict.
The cartoon also depicts a counteroffensive gun being fired at the bear as a representation of the pushback and opposition the US and UN soldiers offered against Soviet incursion. The individual with the gun stands in for the United Nations forces, principally under the direction of the United States, who were instrumental in defending South Korea and thwarting North Korean aggression that was supported by the Soviet Union.
Learn more on the cold war here https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ1
50 points :>
Anwser these questions
The economies of the Upper South and the Deep South became interdependent around 1860 due to the institution of slavery. The Upper South, including states like Virginia, Maryland, and Kentucky, was primarily a slave-owning agricultural region that grew crops like tobacco, wheat, and corn.
The Deep South, which included states like Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana, was a region with large cotton plantations that relied heavily on slave labor. The Upper South produced food crops that were sold to the Deep South, which in turn supplied the Upper South with cotton for textiles and other goods. This mutually beneficial relationship made the economies of both regions heavily reliant on each other.
What are the Analysis Skills?In terms of question 3, Some Southerners contributed to industrial growth in the region by investing in factories and mills that produced goods for the Southern market. This was particularly true in the Upper South, where there was more economic diversity and a larger population. Some wealthy planters invested in industries like iron and steel production, textile mills, and tobacco manufacturing. This investment created jobs and boosted the local economy, and some Southerners believed that it would help to reduce the region's reliance on Northern manufactured goods.
Lastly, in terms of question 4, There were several barriers to transportation in the South that hindered economic development. The region had few major cities or seaports, which made it difficult to transport goods to market. The South also had an inadequate transportation infrastructure, with few roads, railroads, or canals. The rugged terrain of the Appalachian Mountains made it particularly challenging to build transportation infrastructure in the Upper South. These barriers to transportation limited economic growth in the South and contributed to the region's economic underdevelopment compared to the North.
Learn more about Analysis Skills from
https://brainly.com/question/1086200
#SPJ1
See text below
Building History-Social Science Analysis Skills
2. DESCRIBING Discuss ways the economies of the Upper South and the Deep South became dependent on each other around 1860.
3. EXPLAINING ISSUES How did some Southerners contribute to industrial growth in the region?
4. IDENTIFYING CAUSES What were the barriers to Southern transportation?
Circle the division problem that does not belong with the other three. Explain. Write the problem that does belong. (621 divided by 6) (384 divided by 3) (719 divided by 7) (
Answer:
\(\frac{384}{3} = ??\)
Explanation:
The division problems are:
\(\frac{621}{6} = ??\)
\(\frac{384}{3} = ??\)
\(\frac{719}{7} = ??\)
\(\frac{514}{5} = ??\)
Required
Determine the odd one among the division problems
The first step is to solve each problem
\(\frac{621}{6} = 103.5\)
\(\frac{384}{3} = 128\)
\(\frac{719}{7} = 102.7\)
\(\frac{514}{5} = 102.8\)
Next, we compare the result of each problem
From observation,
The results of \(\frac{621}{6} = 103.5\) , \(\frac{719}{7} = 102.7\) and \(\frac{514}{5} = 102.8\) are decimals
While \(\frac{384}{3} = 128\) gave an integer result
So, we can conclude that: \(\frac{384}{3} = ??\) is the odd one among the division problems because it gave integer result
why did piedmont's power grow during the 1850?
excerpt from molly elliot seawell, an anti-suffragist from virginia who published the anti-suffrage book, the ladies’ battle, in 1911.
Molly Elliot Seawell was an anti-suffragist from Virginia who published the anti-suffrage book, The Ladies’ Battle, in 1911.
She was one of the many women who believed that suffrage was unnecessary and women should not have the right to vote. Elliot Seawell had written an excerpt from the anti-suffrage book "The Ladies' Battle". Elliot Seawell's book was published in 1911. The excerpt from Molly Elliot Seawell's "The Ladies' Battle" clearly indicated her stance on women's suffrage and the reasons behind her position.
The excerpt read, "I am not ashamed to own that I am an anti-suffragist. The vast majority of women are and will remain anti-suffragists. A few freaks, mostly spinsters and man-like women, have gone over to the suffragists, but the true womanly woman will always be an anti. They do not want political power; they know they have a thousand times more influence without it.
"Seawell believed that the majority of women were anti-suffragists and only a few individuals were supporting suffrage. She claimed that those women who supported suffrage were mostly unmarried and were not truly feminine. She also believed that women had enough influence without political power.
To know more about anti-suffragist refer here : brainly.com/question/9056917
#SPJ11
BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER!!!
The transcendentalist movement argued that people should:
O A. spread Christian beliefs to American Indians.
O B. earn as much money as possible.
O C. respect and protect the environment.
O D. leave the United States to live independently.
Answer:
Explanation:
A ?
Answer:
its c.
Explanation:
Which philosopher believed that sense perceptions and observations are essential for knowledge? a. socrates b. plato c. hippocrates d. aristotle please select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Option(a) Socrates is the right answer.
Socrates believed that sense perceptions and observations are essential for knowledge.
What was Socrates famous for most?As one of the most well-known individuals in history, Socrates of Athens (c. 470/469-399 BCE) laid the groundwork for all of Western philosophy with his contributions to the growth of ancient Greek philosophy. For this reason, he is referred to as the "Father of Western Philosophy."What was Socrates' overarching philosophy?According to Socrates, philosophy should produce useful outcomes for the benefit of society as a whole. He made an effort to develop an ethical framework devoid of theological ideology and based on human reason. Socrates argued that the pursuit of happiness was the driving force behind human decision-making.What was the saying of Socrates?Socrates' maxim was: "You must know yourself before you can speak of yourself or of what you can know." "What Is Wisdom", he questioned people, among other things?To know more about Socrates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23964634
#SPJ4
why were southern states against protective tariffs
Answer:
In 1828, Congress passed a high protective tariff that infuriated the southern states because they felt it only benefited the industrialized north. For example, a high tariff on imports increased the cost of British textiles.
Explanation:
I just want you to read this and tell me what you think
I wanted to share this with you. Is Jesus the only way to get to God? We did not invent the claim of Jesus being the only way. This is not our claim; it is His. Jesus said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me” (John 14:6, NASB) and, “For unless you believe that I am He, you shall die in your sins” (John 8:24, NASB). The apostle Peter echoed these words, “Neither is their salvation in any other: for there is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12, KJV). Paul said, “There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”(I Timothy 2:5, KJV). It is therefore the united testimony of the New Testament that no one can know God the Father except through Jesus Christ.
The bond between man and nature was broken, with the ground producing thorns and thistles and the animal world no longer being benevolent (Genesis 3:17, 18). Man also became separated from himself, with a feeling of emptiness and incompleteness, something he had not experienced before the fall. However, God promised to make all these things right and gave His word that He would send a Saviour, or Messiah, who would deliver the entire creation from the bondage of sin (Genesis 3:15). The Old Testament kept repeating the theme that someday this person would come into the world and set mankind free.
God’s Word did come true. God became a man in the person of Jesus Christ (John 1:14, 29). Jesus eventually died in our place in order that we could enjoy again a right relationship with God. The Bible says, “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself” and “he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (II Corinthians 5:19, 21, KJV).
Jesus has paved the way for you! God has done it all, and our responsibility is to accept that fact. We can do nothing to add to the work of Jesus; it has all been done for us. How do you become a Christian? Believe that you are loved and accepted by God. Admit that you are a sinner. Acknowledge your sins. It’s not enough to admit that you have sinned. You must regret those sins and then turn away from them. Repenting is asking God to forgive your sins and turning away from them. Commit your life to Christ.
When I was six years old my dad died so, I accepted God as my savior because my mom said that it's better to do life with God. You could say I loved praying and talking to God when I was six, but I didn't really know what it meant. When I was nine years old I started to realize who God was and that I needed Him. A couple of days before my brother died in the hospital, I remember that my siblings and I were over at a friend's house because we needed someone to watch us while our parents were at the hospital, and we had school the next day. I was so tired of crying and worrying about my brother, so I asked God to give me rest and help clear my mind. That next day I slept in, and the daughter of my parent's friend woke me up and said, "It's a snow day", (it was dry the day before) (December). I knew that God was giving me rest and all my school worries went away. When my brother died on December 20th a week before Christmas, I did not get mad at God instead, I thanked Him for the time I had with my brother and knowing that I'll see him soon. I knew that God was a morning with me. Even though God gets to have my brother, He knows that I still have to go through the pain.
People blame God for the things that happen to them because they can and because it's someone to blame. God lets things happen for a reason. That reason is to grow other people. I learned that at the age of nine. I would not be the person I am today if that didn't happen. Many people say they don't believe in God, then they say "it's God's fault, why did God do this? I hate him". Why are you blaming Him when you don't believe in him? It's not fair. When someone dies in a person's life we get mad instead of realizing it's a part of life, we live in a fallen world. I remember this story where there was a pastor that was going to die because of cancer and he kept saying that he was going to be healed. Soon he died. His kids were confused and frustrated. They became mad at God. They didn't realize that God did heal him, he is now in heaven and has no pain. Today his kids don't want anything to do with God. I met one of his kids and we are good friends today but, I can never talk about the thing that is most important to me, which is God.
God wants you to be a part of His movement, whether you accept Him or not just remember He is in your DNA. If you are an atheist you are saying that life has no creator, that is like saying that a book can create its self there is not an author and there is no planning or thought behind the words or how many pages there are.
Answer:
YES!!! JESUS IS ALWAYS THE ANSWER! GOD BLESS! <33
Explanation: