If the purpose of a statute is regulatory and the enforcement of licensing requirements is deemed to be in the public interest, then any unlicensed transaction becomes illegal. Option B
This is because the regulation and enforcement of licensing requirements is designed to protect the public and ensure that individuals engaging in certain activities have the necessary skills and qualifications to do so safely and competently. If unlicensed individuals are allowed to engage in these activities, there is a risk of harm to the public.
Enforcement of licensing requirements may include fines, penalties, and other legal consequences for those who engage in unlicensed transactions. This is intended to deter individuals from engaging in such activities and ensure compliance with the regulations designed to protect the public.
It is important to note that unlicensed transactions may not necessarily be void or unenforceable. Instead, they are simply illegal and subject to the consequences outlined in the applicable statutes and regulations. It is always advisable to seek legal advice if there is any uncertainty regarding the legality of a particular transaction.Therefore option B is correct.
For more such on licensing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31517493
#SPJ11
Kant offers an example of an honest shopkeeper who refuses to cheat his customers. Kant imagines one motive that the shopkeeper might have: a worry that if he is dishonest, word will get out and he will lose business. Why does Kant discuss this example?
Answer:
He wants to demonstrate that an honest action can sometimes lack moral worth if it is done from the wrong motive.
Explanation:
Since in the question, Kant predict one motive that if the shopkeeper is dishonest than he will lose his business which makes him worry
This example reflects that if the honest action is taken out that lead to lacking moral worth in case when it is done with the wrong intention or motive
Therefore the above is the answer that should be considered
true/false; cabinet department Taft created to help workers
Cabinet department Taft created to help workers is true(because the department was designed to promote the welfare and improve the working conditions of wage earners, including the regulation of child labor, the establishment of minimum wage standards, and the implementation of safety regulations in the workplace).
President William Howard Taft created the Department of Labor in 1913 to address the needs of American workers.
The Department of Labor is responsible for the formulation and implementation of labor policies and programs, including the enforcement of labor laws and the administration of various benefit programs for workers. It also oversees the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which collects and analyzes data on employment, wages, and other economic indicators.
Overall, the creation of the Department of Labor represented a significant step forward in the protection and empowerment of American workers. By focusing on the needs and concerns of employees, the department has helped to promote fair labor practices and improve the quality of life for millions of working people in the United States.
For more questions on: wage
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
You’re given an assignment to write a brief for your supervising attorney, in a lawsuit
between two local businesses over payment of a construction contract totaling $100,000.
In preparing this document, it’s important that you educate the judge on
A. the procedural rules of your state court system.
B. the law applicable to the case in question.
C. the difference between substantive law and procedural law.
D. the constitutional standards for admitting evidence.
Based on the peculiarity of rule of law in different localities and the content of this question, when preparing this document, you must educate the judge on the procedural rules of your state court system.
What are the Procedural rules of the state court systems?The term Procedural rules of the state court systems are used to describe the law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the state court system.
Generally, it is believed that state court systems follow their own state rules of civil procedure which may be widely different from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).
Therefore, since the court case involved two local businesses, and to ensure there is fairness, the Judge should be aware of the procedural rules of your state court system to determine the right judgment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the. the correct answer is option A. "the procedural rules of your state court system."
Learn more about the procedural rules here: https://brainly.com/question/28560902
#SPJ1
What group in the United States is MOST likely to be stereotyped as involved with organized crime?
Russian Americans
Italian Americans
Albanian Americans
Irish Americans
Answer:
I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war
Explanation:
I may be wrong
Answer:
Italian Americans
Explanation:
in a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.truefalse
In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence. This staement is false.
One form of evidential criterion employed in a burden of proof analysis is preponderance of the evidence. The burden of proof is met under the preponderance standard when the party with the burden shows the fact finder that there is a more than 50% possibility that the claim is true. In a civil trial, this is the burden of proof.
In Karch v. Karch, 885 A.2d 535, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania found that "preponderance of the evidence is defined as the greater weight of the evidence, i.e., to tip a scale slightly is the criteria or requirement for preponderance of the evidence".
Similarly, in another Pennsylvania case, the court stated that "preponderance of the evidence is such evidence as causes a fact-finder to believe."
To know more about preponderance of evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/15987790
#SPJ4
The shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for comfort and esteem.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for "comfort and esteem."
According to various research findings, the people that move from periodic social drinking to substance abuse usually do such due to the need to give themselves comfort when they are suffering from one sad moment or depression.
The other way people change from periodic drinking to substance abuse is to elevate their self-esteem, especially when they are low on confidence.
Hence, in this case, the statement is TRUE.
Do you think interest groups help or harm the formation of U.S. foreign policy? Explain your answer in a brief paragraph.
I think an interest groups helps in the formation of U.S. foreign policy because they pursue a policy that favors the country, against the other country.
Who are called the interest groups?Also known as the pressure group, means an association of individuals usually organized on the basis of one or more shared concerns, attempts to influence public policy in its favour. They shared a desire to affect government policy to benefit themselves or their causes and their goal could be a policy that exclusively benefits group members or one segment of society.
The main techniques that the interest groups use to influence foreign policy includes by influencing the Congress, influencing the Executive Branch, influencing public opinion, direct action and corruption.
Read more about interest groups
brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1
A man decided to steal a car he saw parked on a hill. After he got in and started the engine, the car began rolling down the hill. The man quickly discovered that the car's brakes did not work. He crashed through the window of a store located at the bottom of the hill. The man was charged with larceny of the car and with the crime of malicious damage to property. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that if the jury found both that the man was guilty of larceny of the car and that the damage to the store was the result of that larceny, then it should also find him guilty of malicious damage to property. The man was convicted on both counts. On appeal, he argued that the conviction for malicious damage to property should be reversed because the instruction was not a correct statement of the law.
Required:
Should the man's conviction be affirmed?
The man's conviction for malicious damage to property should be affirmed based on the given information and the judge's instruction to the jury.
The man's actions of stealing the car and subsequently crashing it into the store resulted in both the crime of larceny (stealing the car) and the malicious damage to property (damaging the store). The judge correctly instructed the jury that if they found the man guilty of larceny and determined that the damage to the store was a result of that larceny, then they should also find him guilty of malicious damage to property.
In this case, the man's act of stealing the car directly led to the chain of events that caused damage to the store. Therefore, his conviction for malicious damage to property is justified under the principle of causation. The instruction provided by the judge accurately reflects the legal connection between the two offenses, and the jury's decision to convict the man on both counts is consistent with the law.
Based on these considerations, the man's conviction for malicious damage to property should be affirmed.
To know more about malicious damage, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30927916#
#SPJ11
When merging, yield to traffic __.
A. already on the road you’re joining
B. on your right side only
C. if its going slower than you
D. if its going the same speed as you
When merging, yield to traffic already on the road you’re joining. Thus the correct option is A.
What is traffic?Traffic is referred to as the movement of vehicles on roads or highways. When this movement of vehicles is restricted it gives rise to jams making all the vehicles in slow motion and unable to make it to the destination.
In comparison to large-size vehicles, two-wheeled vehicles are smaller in size and can travel through traffic more effortlessly. Taking shortcuts on the road through narrow roads—which are impractical for four-wheelers like cars—also enables people to arrive on time.
When merging the vehicle in the lane one is required to evaluate the speed of running vehicles in order to avoid any accident or collision with them. one should see the movement of vehicles when changing lanes and maintain a slower speed.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Merging the vehicle, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4637613
#SPJ2
Which of the following are among the goals of environmental scanning? (Check all that apply.) -Continually acquiring information on external events -Interpreting and ideating trends
Option 1 is Correct. One of the objectives of environmental scanning is to continuously gather information about external events.
Information regarding events and their connections within the internal and external environments of an organization are gathered through the process of environmental scanning. Environmental scanning is mostly used to assist management in choosing the organization's future course.
Environmental scanning is the continuous observation of patterns and events in the internal and external environments of an organization that have an impact on its success now and in the future. The findings are very helpful in defining objectives and tactics. As the business environment encompasses both the external and internal environments in which the business is practiced, the environment scanning is applied to both the external and internal scanning processes.
Learn more about environmental Visit: brainly.com/question/26441012
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which of the following are among the goals of environmental scanning? (Check all that apply.)
1. Continually acquiring information on external events
2. Interpreting and ideating trends
Richard, an 11-year-old boy, bangs his head against the wall because doing so typically leads to his mother backing off on requests for him to do chores. He has been banging his head more frequently for the past 2 weeks. According to the Four-Factor Model of NSSI, which function seems to be the MOST relevant to Richard’s NSSI?
As Richard bangs his head against the wall because doing so typically leads to his mother backing off on requests for him to do chores. The act of banging his head for past 2 weeks according to the Four-Factor Model of NSSI shows that the automatic-positive reinforcement function seems to be the MOST relevant to Richard’s NSSI.
What should we know about 4 Factor Model of NSSI?The acronym "NSSI" means a nonsuici-dal self-injury, which refers to a repeated and intention damage to the surface of body with intent to cause bleeding, bruising or pain and no suidi-cal intent.
According to Nock & Prinstein, they demonstrated that both structural and construct validity of a four-factor model of NSSI functions includes a automatic-negative reinforcement, automatic-positive reinforcement, social-negative reinforcement and social-positive reinforcement.
Read more about nonsuic-idal self-injury
brainly.com/question/4036744
#SPJ1
When something has already taken place you can use it as a rule of law o Start matching if you like the holding of the case
When something has already occurred, you can use it as a legal standard to start matching if you favor the decision made in the case; this is referred to be precedent.
Controlling precedents are referred to as "binding authority" in a jurisdiction. Any legal authority that a court must abide with while making a decision is known as a binding authority. Persuasive authority: Courts frequently use persuasive authorities (case law from other jurisdictions) while making decisions in first-impression matters. Occasionally, a court will veer from the rule of precedent if it determines that it should no longer be obeyed. This is known as a departure from first impression. A court may make a decision that differs from a precedent if it determines that the precedent is simply inaccurate or if social or technological advancements have rendered it irrelevant.
To learn more about precedent please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14816803
#SPJ4
Once you know a hazard exists the length of time you take to execute your actions is your
Answer: Reaction time
Once you know a hazard exists, [ the length of time you take to execute your actions is your Reaction time.
strategic public relations
Answer:
At their heart, all public relations campaigns are about planning and strategy. After all, without a good strategy, it would be impossible for a PR expert to ensure that they were having the right impact on an audience with their marketing solutions, or that they were releasing press content at the right time. The “strategic planning” part of public relations is what sets it apart as a critical component of building a business and managing a company reputation.
Strategic planning starts with setting a goal for a PR campaign. Once a vision of success is established, PR companies can then work alongside their clients to carve out an effective route to that end target. Strategic planning ensures that press releases go out just at the right time to cause a social splash, and that reputation management strategies have components in place that allow businesses to respond quickly when disaster strikes.
Explanation:
What does campaign mean in politics?
An coordinated effort to sway the course of decision-making within a particular organization is known as a political campaign.
What constitutes a political campaign's primary objective?The core of a political campaign is persuading voters. A campaign is a specific course of action with a short-, medium-, or long-term goal of producing results. Since the founding of our nation, advertisements, theme songs, stump speeches, and even negative campaigning have existed. Since then, every technological advancement has created new ways for candidates to influence voters. The three basic marketing objectives of awareness, consideration, and conversion make up the campaign objectives. The objective you select should fit into the group that is most similar to your present advertising objectives. Creating interest in your good or service by spreading awareness.
To know more about campaign visit:
brainly.com/question/29707776
#SPJ4
an example of a treaty automatically creating legal rights in the courts of a signatory state includes:
An example of a treaty automatically creating legal rights in the courts of a signatory state includes: Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air.
The Montreal convention is a multilateral treaty adopted with the aid of a diplomatic meeting of ICAO member states in 1999. It amended important provisions of the Warsaw convention's regime concerning reimbursement for the victims of air failures.
What is the motive of the Montreal convention?
The primary targets of the Montreal convention are to offer for equitable repayment for demise or harm to passengers, and damage to luggage and load, that occur in worldwide air carriage. To facilitate the green operation of global carriage by way of air of passengers, baggage and cargo.
Who does the Montreal convention practice to?
The Montreal convention applies to all international flights between nations and territories that honor the regulation. Currently, over a hundred thirty five nations and territories abide by way of the Montreal convention. All member states of the European Union and the general public of the UN member states recognize the convention.
Learn more about Montreal convention here:- https://brainly.com/question/27936767
#SPJ4
Explain how Congress could have addressed the increasing cost of insulin prior to 2017.
Prior to 2017, Congress has complete authority to enact legislation that covers both biologics and certain chemically created goods, such as insulin. The cost of insulin would have been lower if this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved together in 2009.
What is Congress?Generally, The legislative body of the federal government of the United States of America is known as the United States Congress. It is bicameral, meaning that it is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives, which is the lower body, and the Senate, which is the upper body. It has its meetings at the Capitol Building in Washington, District of Columbia.
Before 2017, Congress has all of the authority necessary to enact a statute that will not only encompass the chemically created items but also certain chemically produced biologics, such as insulin.
If this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved in 2009 together, the cost of insulin may have been brought down to a more reasonable level.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
License fees are imposed in the exercise of police power.
True or False
Explanation:
I think yes
True
hmmmmmm
Assume that you are a crime scene investigator and you have been called in to investigate a crime. Describe the crime scene in a paragraph and draw a sketch of what you see.
Answer: i can't draw a sketch but this is what i imagine that there is blood on the floor and there is a dead body as well and in the body there are knife stabs and there are 7 of them
Explanation:
in michigan the real estate license law is administered by
In Michigan, the administration and regulation of the real estate license law is overseen by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA). Specifically, the responsibility falls under the Real Estate Bureau, which is a part of the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
LARA is the state government agency responsible for ensuring the public's health, safety, and welfare in various industries and professions, including real estate.
The Real Estate Bureau within LARA is responsible for implementing and enforcing the provisions of the Michigan Occupational Code related to real estate licensing.
This includes issuing licenses to real estate professionals, such as brokers and salespersons, and ensuring compliance with the laws and regulations governing real estate transactions.
LARA's Real Estate Bureau handles various aspects of real estate licensing, including establishing eligibility requirements for licensure, processing applications, conducting background checks, and administering examinations.
The bureau also investigates complaints and disciplinary actions against licensees who violate the real estate license law or engage in unethical or fraudulent practices.
Overall, LARA's Real Estate Bureau plays a crucial role in upholding professional standards, protecting consumers, and maintaining the integrity of the real estate industry in Michigan.
To know more about license law refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/33439711#
#SPJ11
What is the function of the Judicial Branch?
Enforce the Law
Make the Law
Execute the Law
Interpret the Law and settle disputes
Answer: The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws.
Explanation: Their whole purpose is basically to apply laws to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution.
Judicial Branch are kind of like the Jury in the court. They are responsible for protecting the rights of the people. They give power to the people. They Have The Power to Get Its Decisions and Judgments Enforced. These are some of the many functions of the Judicial Branch.
Answer:
to settle legal disputes and determine the constitutionality of laws
Explanation:
Greg Deveroux just turned eighteen years old, and on a dare from friends he foolishly entered the arcade on the city’s boardwalk after it had closed for the evening. He has never been in trouble with the police before and did not steal anything in the arcade, although he did trip over some boxes in the storeroom. The noise alerted the night watchman, who subsequently turned Greg over to police, and he was arrested for breaking and entering. Today he stands before the judge at his arraignment to determine if he will be released from jail until his trial begins in three months. What is the most likely outcome of Greg’s request to be released from jail? Responses
Greg won't need to post bail or hand over any property deeds to ensure his attendance; he will be freed on his own recognizance.
What does Gentle Is the Night mean?"Soft or delicate in texture or consistence; yielding easily to force or pressure; fragile; easily broken, divided, compressed, or wounded," according to the dictionary, describes what tender means. Keats and Fitzgerald appear to be telling us that the night is particularly vulnerable in this way.
Is Tender Is the Night a book you should read?This book is a masterpiece from beginning to end, and I've read it numerous times, getting something new out of each reading. It is a tragedy, a romance, and a wellspring of rich, poetic prose.
To know more about bail visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ1
Facts: Officers wanted to search Dollree Mapp's house, but she said no because they did not have a warrant. They were looking for a suspected bomber. Eventually, the police forced their way in. They did not find a bomber, but they did find a trunk of obscene pictures in the basement. Ms. Mapp was arrested and convicted for possession of obscenity. She appealed.
Question for the court: Can you be convicted on the basis of illegally obtained evidence? Decision: No. The court held that evidence seized without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions both in Federal and now State courts. This is called the Exclusionary Rule. Issue: Can the Exclusionary Rule cause a criminal to go free? Explain below in 2-4 sentences.
Answer:
they didn't have a warrant so they shouldn't have forced there way in. Also they cannot be arrested
Explanation:
hoped this helped sry if wrong lol
A liberal response to the ""strained resources"" of local government most likely would include.
A liberal response to the ""strained resources"" of local government is an increase in Federal spending on public education.
What is a government?It should be noted that a government simply means a group of people that are elected to rule a state.
In this case, a liberal response to the ""strained resources"" of local government is an increase in Federal spending on public education and more programs aimed at helping lower income communities.
Learn more about government on:
https://brainly.com/question/18464634
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
3.
Which of the following is most accurate regarding the relationship between recent changes to state marijuana laws and the recruitment of new law enforcement hires?
Answer:
xjxn
Explanation:
sisjshhdjcojssjxkknskxjansokxksjsx
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
According to your text and consistent with Rational Choice Theory, three of the following four choices are considered recognized motives for committing crime. Which one does NOT belong?
According to Rational Choice Theory, three of the following four choices are considered recognized motives for committing crime:
Economic gainSocial influenceRevengeAttentionOne of the choices that does not belong is "attention." While some criminals may commit crimes in order to gain attention or notoriety, this is not typically considered a recognized motive for committing crime under Rational Choice Theory. The other three choices - economic gain, social influence, and revenge - are all recognized motives for committing crime.
Rational Choice Theory is a theoretical framework that explains criminal behavior as a rational choice made by individuals based on their own self-interest. According to this theory, individuals who commit crimes weigh the potential gains and losses of committing the crime against the potential costs, and choose to commit the crime if the potential gains outweigh the potential costs. The motives for committing crime can vary widely, but Rational Choice Theory focuses on the rational decision-making process that underlies criminal behavior.
Learn more about Rational Choice Theory
https://brainly.com/question/31719485
#SPJ4
Angelina and Brad have six kids. They have been secretly separated for a number of years, and they have finally decided to get a divorce. During their separation, the kids
lived primarily with Angelina. However, Brad insists he should get primary custody of the children. If he can't get custody of all of the kids, he is willing to settle for
custody of his three favorite kids and let Angelina have the other three.
What are some of the issues here?
- 12
Pararanh