False. If Terrill steals a digital camera and sells it to Samuel, Samuel will not obtain a valid title, even if he can prove that he gave value for the camera and acted in good faith.
The principle that applies in this scenario is known as the "void title" rule.
Under the void title rule, if someone obtains property through theft or other illegal means, they cannot transfer valid ownership rights to another person, regardless of that person's good faith or the consideration given for the property. This means that even if Samuel purchased the stolen camera in good faith and paid for it, he would not acquire legal ownership of the camera.
The true owner of the camera would still retain the rightful ownership and could seek to recover the stolen property from Samuel. Generally, the law seeks to protect the rights of the true owner and does not recognize the legitimacy of transactions involving stolen goods.
It is essential to discourage the market for stolen property and promote the return of stolen items to their rightful owners. If Samuel unknowingly purchased a stolen camera, he may have legal recourse against Terrill for restitution, but he would not obtain valid title or ownership rights over the camera itself.
In such situations, it is crucial for individuals to exercise caution and conduct proper due diligence when purchasing goods to ensure their legitimacy and legality. Reporting suspicious or stolen items to the authorities can help prevent the perpetuation of illegal activities and protect the rights of the true owners.
Learn more about digital camera here
https://brainly.com/question/609508
#SPJ11
How did federal officials make Plains nations settle in one place?
Federal officials implemented several policies to make the Plains nations settle in one place. One of the most significant was the establishment of reservations, which were areas of land designated for Native American tribes to live on.
The federal government hoped that by confining Native Americans to these reservations, they could more easily control and assimilate them. To further encourage settlement on reservations, the federal government passed laws that made it illegal for Native Americans to leave the reservation without permission. These laws were enforced by military personnel who would capture and punish any Native Americans who tried to leave the reservation.
The government also used economic pressure to encourage Native Americans to settle on the reservations. They often withheld rations, supplies, and other forms of aid from tribes that refused to settle on the reservation. The government hoped that by making life difficult for Native Americans who resisted settlement, they could compel them to give up their nomadic lifestyle and become farmers.
Learn more about farmers here:
https://brainly.com/question/3226068
#SPJ11
what is medicare power of attorney
Answer:
A medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare. ... This allows an agent (a trusted friend or family member) to make important and necessary healthcare decisions if the individual becomes incapacitated or unable to communicate or participate in care.
Answer:
A medical power of attorney or medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare.
Explanation:
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Lilac~
As set forth by Regulation Z, before enforcing an acceleration clause that appears as part of the mortgage, lenders must wait until payments are delinquent at least how many days.
In a home loan contract, a "speed increase statement" is an arrangement that allows the moneylender to request that the borrower reimburse the whole credit after a default. A "speed increase condition" in a home loan or deed of trust permits the moneylender or current credit holder.
Pyramiding late expenses allude to a loan boss' act of forcing a late charge when a purchaser sends a convenient installment in a sum adequate to cover the consistently planned installment however deficient to cover an earlier neglected late or misconduct expense.
TILA advances the educated use regarding purchaser credit by requiring convenient revelation of its expenses. It additionally incorporates considerable arrangements, for example, the purchaser's right of rescission on specific home loan advances and the convenient goal of charging questions.
To learn more about Regulation here
https://brainly.com/question/14955878
#SPJ4
Which of the following is the first attribute you should use to determine the seniority between two individuals?
Responses
length of service in the department
rank of the person
length of service in the rank in the department
number of personnel directly reporting to him or her
Rank of the person is the first attribute you should use to determine the seniority between two individuals.
HOW DO DEPARTMENT EXAMPLES WORK?Several different items can be referred to as departments. An administrative division within a country, a government ministry, or simply a section of an institution are examples. In this definition, we make use of the word "department" to refer to several organizational divisions.
What does "department" signify in the workplace?One of the divisions inside a company, government agency, or academic institution is a department. In a big store, a department is also one of the sections. The U.S. Department of Agriculture He changed locations and went to sales.
To know more about Department visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11539179
#SPJ1
How would you behave to alleviate the distress
Answer:
Identify your needs. ...
Focus on what you want — not on what you don't. ...
Honor your needs. ...
Get moving. ...
Develop a nurturing voice. ...
Reverse the “Golden Rule.” ...
Practice a soothing gesture. ...
Practice different perspectives.
Explanation:
Every judge has the power to decide the cases before him/her without having to follow the decisions of any other judge or court.
Answer:
Judicial power is the power “of a court to decide and pronounce a judgment and carry it into effect between persons and parties who bring a case before it for decision.”
The time allowed for one party to sue another and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit are examples of ________.
The time allowed for one party to sue another and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit are examples of Statute of limitations.
Statute of limitations is defined as the time allowed for one party to sue another, and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit. It refers to the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated after the occurrence of a particular event or incident.
The term statute of limitations applies to a wide range of legal proceedings and provides a time frame within which legal proceedings may be commenced.
It sets out time limits within which legal proceedings must be commenced after the cause of action arises.It refers to the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated after the occurrence of a particular event or incident.
A statute of limitations is typically enacted by a legislative body and varies depending on the nature of the case. The statutes of limitations vary from one jurisdiction to another and may be dependent on the nature of the lawsuit and the relevant laws of that jurisdiction.
In conclusion, the statute of limitations is the time limit within which legal proceedings may be initiated, and the rules governing the process of a lawsuit. A statute of limitations is typically enacted by a legislative body and varies depending on the nature of the case.
Learn more about statute of limitations here https://brainly.com/question/30666158
#SPJ11
A type of lawsuit originating under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code that allows people to sue government employees for violating their constitutional rights is ___
A type of lawsuit originating under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code that allows people to sue government employees for violating their constitutional rights is a 1983 lawsuit.
In other words, the violation of an established right must be alleged by the plaintiff in order for their claim to be actionable under Section 1983. A human rights lawsuit is one filed under Section 1983. Anyone whose civil rights have been infringed may file one.
If the perpetrator acted illegally, the victim may bring a claim. 1. According to the U.S. Constitution or specific federal statutes, civil rights are protected.
Consider the scenario if a member of the Metropolitan Police Department unlawfully detained a person. The person was physically abused by several officers while being arrested. It is conceivable that this behavior would justify a Chapter 1983 civil rights complaint against it.
learn more about lawsuits here
https://brainly.com/question/26747114
#SPJ4
powerpoint slides about the difference between hick's law and fitt's law. when is it best to use one law over the other, and why are they important in designing?
Users will take longer to decide if they are presented with more stimuli (or options).
What is Hick's law ?
William Edmund Hick and Ray Hyman, a British and American psychology partnership, are the namesakes of Hick's Law (also known as the Hick-Hyman Law). These two researchers set out to investigate the connection between the quantity of stimuli present and a person's response time to each stimulus in 1952. It seems sense that the more stimuli a user has to pick from, the longer it takes for them to decide which one to interact with. Users that are presented with several options must take their time to understand and make decisions, which results in their being assigned tasks they don't want to accomplish.
In other words Hick's Law simply states that when more options are provided it takes longer to decide which option to chose .
to learn more about hick's law click
https://brainly.com/question/13710772
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a difference between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution that is a response to a problem expressed in the passage?
A) The Articles of Confederation lacked federal executive and judicial branches, whereas the United States Constitution did not.
B) The Articles of Confederation allowed for the federal government to request revenues from states but did not permit it to tax citizens directly, whereas under the United States Constitution the federal government could tax citizens directly.
C) Under the Articles of Confederation, members of the national legislature were paid by the state governments, whereas under the United States Constitution they were paid by the federal government.
D) Under the Articles of Confederation, members of the national legislature were not able to regulate currency, whereas under the United States Constitution the federal government regulates currency.
Option (B) is correct. The federal government was permitted by the Articles of Confederation to ask the states for money, but it was not allowed to tax people directly; this was changed by the United-States Constitution.
Articles had been unicameral, had no strength of tax, had no status military, and there has been no change process. Constitution is bicameral, has the rights to levy taxes, has a military, have change process. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to alter commerce, making it not able to shield or standardize exchange among overseas countries and the diverse states.
Outwardly patterned on a lot of the US, it had 3 obtrusive modifications: 1) the Preamble makes clean that is a federal authorities of Sovereign, Independent States, 2) they invoked 'the choose of Almighty God', and 3) they outlawed the Slave Trade absolutely, a primary in American Constitutional law. Articles are the sections of the report that describe the powers and features of the authorities. The U.S. Constitution has 7 articles at the same time as the Florida Constitution has 12 articles. 21. Amendments are modifications which have been made to a constitution.
Learn more about Confederation visit: brainly.com/question/19875019
#SPJ4
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
5. Is Carl Lee Hailey sane...or insane? After deciding, explain the reasons for your choice.
Answer:
I believe that Carl Lee Hailey was sane, just that he was overcome by rage because of his daughter's abduction. Even though he was acquitted due to insanity, that was only due to his brother's attorney's quick thinking.
Explanation:
A contract is a legally ________ promise or set of promises made by one party to another.
A contract is a legally binding promise or set of promises made by one party to another.
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties, in which each party agrees to do or not do something in exchange for some form of consideration, such as money, goods, or services. Contracts can be written or verbal, and they are used in many different contexts, from employment agreements to rental contracts to business deals. The terms of a contract are binding on all parties involved, and failure to fulfill the obligations outlined in the contract can result in legal action.
For such more question on contract
https://brainly.com/question/30708720
#SPJ4
Haan i miing hi normal equipment but need to tranport a bullet from the crime. In an attempt to protect the bullet, which proce would be BEST to ue?
fold it in a clean piece of paper
put it in a pocket
wrap it in a towel
wrap it in platic wrap
Answer:
Wrap it in plastic wrap.
the fbi’s request for access to apple’s encryption code is part of the legal war between
The legal war between the FBI and Apple over access to encryption code.
The FBI's request for access to Apple's encryption code is part of the legal war between the two entities.
The conflict arises from the tension between national security concerns and individual privacy rights.
The FBI has sought access to encrypted data on devices such as iPhones to aid in criminal investigations and prevent potential threats.
However, Apple has maintained that creating a "backdoor" or weakening encryption would compromise the privacy and security of its users.
This legal battle represents a larger debate over the balance between law enforcement's investigative powers and the protection of personal data.
The outcome of such cases can have significant implications for the future of digital privacy and encryption technologies.
For more such questions on encryption, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30186009
#SPJ11
What federal court would be the first to hear a criminal case?
Any lawsuit arising under federal court, the Law, or pacts is heard in federal court. The majority of cases involving federal issues or offences begin in district courts, which are nearly always granted original jurisdiction.
District courts hear wants to appeal cases only when a constitutional question arises in state courts. According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. The federal Court has original jurisdiction when it is the first and only Court to hear a case. The Constitution also gives Congress the authority to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court; to that end, Congress established the United States district courts, which hear the majority of federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals.
Learn more about federal Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ4
when liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as ______ liability.
When liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as strict liability.
The term strict liability refers to liability that is determined without regard to guilt mind. A person can be held legally accountable for losses or harms brought on by their actions, regardless of what they intended or felt at the time. This legal principle is known as strict liability.
It is not necessary to demonstrate the defendant's negligence or malicious intent when there is strict liability. The focus should be on the act itself and whether it was harmful. Strict liability is frequently used in situations involving inherently risky activities, such as managing wild animals, producing hazardous materials, or engaging in risky activities.
Learn more about strict liability at:
brainly.com/question/32157948
#SPJ4
How does the uniform commercial code differ from the common law of contracts?
Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).
Explanation:
Answer:
Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.
Explanation:
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
4. Are state courts very busy? If so why
are
they?
Answer:
16
Explanation:
Dan is 16 years younger than Emily.
Black American men were granted suffrage before American women.
True
False
Answer:false
Explanation:
Black men were given voting rights in 1870, while black women were effectively banned until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Gidgits Galore can request "Superfund" (or CERCLA) assistance to assess and clean up the brownfield (i.e.
real property, possibly contaminated, considered for reuse) that it would like to develop for another gidgits
factory.
O False
O True
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Which of the following is a LEFT leaning or a LEFT wing source.
Answer:
The new yorker
Explanation:
we all know its not fox news and the wall street journal is more right leaning
The major goal of __is to achieve a just and orderly society through a practical emphasis on social justice?
Answer:
Left Realism
Explanation:
by 1860, most states had eliminated ____________ from their voting requirements.
Answer:
By 1860, most states in the United States had eliminated property as a requirement to vote.
Explanation:
Property as a requirement to vote refers to a law stating that only free men who owned property could vote. Property as a requirement for voting was justified in part by the idea that only free men who owned property had the interest and commitment to participate in the democratic process. However, this law was also used to exclude many people from electoral participation, leading to a lack of representation and political equality.
Answer: The answer is Property requirements
Explanation: By 1860, most states had eliminated Property requirements from their voting requirements.
Property requirements means Ensuring that the quality and the value of the property meet certain minimum thresholds is as important as ensuring that the applicant is willing and able to repay a loan. The Agency imposes quality and value requirements to protect the borrower’s interest and, in the event of liquidation, the Agency’s interest
Hope this was helpful
36010 feel free to answer
Answer:
1325
Explanation:
there u go mate
Answer:
1325
Explanation:
lawyer's client, Consuela, reveals that she is cheating on her spouse, which is why she was taking an unusual route to work. While taking this different route, her tire got punctured and she had to step out of the car to check it out. While Consuela was taking a look at the tire, a random man (whom she did not know) ran past Consuela and slipped a murder weapon in her bag. Just as she was getting the murder weapon out of her bag, the cops arrived and arrested Consuela as an accessory to murder. Prosecutors contend that Consuela knows who the "random man" is, and they allege that she has assisted that man to escape capture. Despite the serious charges against Consuela, she tells her lawyer that she does not want to disclose the real reason why she was taking a different route to work (that she had gone that route in order to be with her paramour - the person with whom she was having an affair). Is the lawyer permitted to reveal what Consuela told her - the reason she was taking that route? Yes, because it serves as evidence and will prevent the client from getting framed. Yes, because the client told the lawyer, which automatically means the lawyer can reveal that information in courts. Yes, because of the mandatory disclosure rule. O No; in this case, the lawyer may only reveal a client's spoken intent to soon commit a crime (i.e., to carry out an impending crime). O No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty
The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".
The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.
Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486
#SPJ11
Jackie is cheated when she buys a defective car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Jackie has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Jackie tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.
Answer:
Jackie needs therapy she's a maniac
Explanation:
Question 6 of 10
Which term describes a situation in which one country can produce more of a
product than other countries?
Absolute Advantage
Explanation:
just got it right on my test?
Answer: Absolute advantage
Explanation: A P E X
if a prepaid smart card or gift card is lost, then the money that was on that card is
Answer:
The money in the gift card will be lost aswell if you loose it