Answer:
I think its c
Explanation:
yea its c 99.98% positive
2. When written communication defames a government official, the official must prove New York Times actual malice to succeed in a libel suit against the writer. That means the defamation was
Answer:
GUILTY
Explanation:
When a government official is defamed in writing, the official must demonstrate genuine malice on the part of The New York Times in order to prevail in a libel case against the writer. That implies that the defamation was guilty.
What is the meaning of the term “defamation”?A person, place, or thing is defamed when incorrect information about them is conveyed to a third party, harming their reputation. It can either be spoken or written. It amounts to wrongdoing or a crime.
A person who makes or publishes any imputation about another person with the intent to hurt that person's reputation or with knowledge that such imputation will do so, save in certain circumstances, is guilty of defamation.
This includes spoken or written words, signs, or visible representations. False information that is presented as true and harms the reputation of the subject is called defamation.
Usually, defamation is described as a false statement that one person makes about another and publishes as fact.
Learn more about defamation from here:
https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ2
Describe the process of ossification or the skull using each of the following terms :
A. Cartilage
B. Blood vessels
C. Osteoblasts
D. Osteocytes
E. Osteoclasts
F. Enzymes
G. Calcium
H. Phosphates
A. Cartilage - This bone, which is weak and fragile and develops during birth, serves as a divider between the bones.
B. Blood vessels- This mostly safeguards the bone's surface, which aids in healing wounds and injuries.
C. Osteoblasts – This particular sort of cell is predominantly employed in the development of new bones. It typically moves and deposits a new bone.
D. Osteocytes- This is a live cell that is imprisoned during the development of a new bone.
E. Osteoclasts- Undoubtedly, this is a cell bone that helps with the disintegration of a bone and the removal of its waste.
F. Enzymes- In order for a new, very healthy bone to form were the injured one once existed, enzymes normally dissolve the damaged portion of the bone.
G. Calcium – Calcium makes sure that the newly created bone is incredibly strong and keeps it that way for the rest of your life.
H. Phosphates- These facilitate the death of mature chondrocytes in the growth plate, which helps to create new bone and allows blood vessels to invade.
Learn more about ossification here:
https://brainly.com/question/12885340
#SPJ1
If a judge learns that a defendant was abused as a child and committed the crime while under extreme financial pressure, what is the most likely outcome?
What percentage of all collisions result from avoidable and unavoidable distractions?
Distracted Driving Statistics 9.4% of accidents in this state were caused by that. In Utah, distracted driving incidents cause an average of 2,006 injuries and 20 fatalities per year.
How many collisions are entirely preventable?Automobile collisions can frequently be avoided. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Agency (NHTSA), human error accounts for between 94% and 96% of all motor vehicle collisions.
What proportion of accidents are the result of distractions?Yet, when you compare the total number of distracted driving collisions to the overall number of collisions, distracted driving has continued to be a significant factor, accounting for 14% to 17% of all collisions.
To know more about Distracted Driving Statistics visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30358115
#SPJ1
Sustainable economic development of the Amazon Rainforest involves protecting natural resources and meeting the needs of
A.
companies that harvest Amazon Rainforest trees for a profit.
B.
communities that depend on the Amazon Rainforest for their survival.
C.
consumers who buy goods made from trees in the Amazon Rainforest.
D.
people who make laws to protect the resources in the Amazon Rainforest.
Answer: I believe it is either
B-) communities that depend on the Amazon Rainforest for their survival.
or
D-) people who make laws to protect the resources in the Amazon Rainforest.
Explanation:
The preservation of our rainforests is the best, most cost-effective defense we have against the loss of biodiversity and the current climate crisis.
Answer:
it is all of them
Explanation:
got it correct
Who was the first law given to? *
-The Egyptians
-The Hebrews
-The Greeks
-The Romans
Quickly please I’m in a testtt
Answer:
The content of the instructions and its interpretations, the Oral Torah, was passed down orally, excerpted and codified in Rabbinical Judaism, and in the Talmud were numbered as the 613 commandments. The Law given to Moses at Sinai (Hebrew Halakhah le-Moshe mi-Sinai הלכה למשה מסיני) is a halakhic distinction.
Explanation:
so i guess the hebrews
Which phrase describes this image most precisely?
A.
a small bunch of beautiful tulips in a transparent jug
B.
a colorful bunch of pretty flowers in a water jug
C.
a colorful bunch of tulips in a transparent jug with a handle
D.
a nice bunch of colorful flowers in a transparent water jug with a handle
E.
a pleasing bunch of tulips in a transparent water jug with a handle
Answer:
i think its e because it describes everything in the pic3
The phrase that would most accurately depict the image is E. a pleasing bunch of tulips in a transparent water jug with a handle.
Which phrase accurately talks about the image?The flowers in the jug are tulips so this should be mentioned. The jug is also transparent and has water in it so this should be mentioned as well.
Finally, the jug has a handle so the best option would mention this too which makes option E the best option.
Find out more on images of flowers at https://brainly.com/question/10054408.
#SPJ2
Complete this sentence. If a piece of glass disappears in a liquid, it has
O the same refractive index as the liquid
O a lower refractive index than the liquid
O a higher refractive index than the liquid
O a different refractive index than the liquid
If a piece of glass disappears in a liquid, it has A. the same refractive index as the liquid
What is the refractive index ?Refractive index, commonly known as the index of refraction, is a measurement of how much a light beam bends when it passes through one medium and into another.
With wavelength, the refractive index may change. When refracted, this allows white light to separate into its component hues. It's known as dispersion. In prisms, rainbows, and as chromatic aberration in lenses, this phenomenon can be seen.
Only if the liquid and glass have the same refractive indices will a glass fragment vanish.
Find out more on refractive index at https://brainly.com/question/12469161
#SPJ1
Why did government agencies want to crack down on communism in the United States?
Answer:communists My teacher American workers organize
Explanation:
lindy lou isonhood a juror's reflections on the death penalty.
What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at work? Explain and analyze why this story speaks to her point.
Answer:
Lou tells the story of when she was working as a judge in the court system and sawa man who looked guilty that he had just killed somebody and the judging panel gave him the death penalty. She believed that this was not right and it pained her toeven think about giving a person the death penalty
Explanation:
i got it from course hero
How does psychiatrist Peter Ash think courts should handle juvenile offenders?
I need a paragraph for this with evidence and reasoning.
According to psychiatrist Peter Ash when deciding how to deal with young offenders, it's important to consider a number of elements, including public safety, a reasonable penalty, and the promotion of moral and productive citizenship.
What is Dr. Peter Ash's take on juvenile offenders?Peter Ash claims that one's capacity for self-control and sound judgment is only one factor in determining one's level of responsibility; another factor is the possibility of development. Adolescents have the option to reflect on their past experiences and, maybe, move on from them as they get older.
We should consider the adolescent to be less accountable since he lacks the same level of decision-making expertise and the same possibilities for introspection as an adult. Knowing that an adolescent is still evolving adds to the disturbing feeling that a teenager who is punished today is not the same person who will be locked up in five years.
To know more about juvenile offenders, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29388996
#SPJ1
Lorne is charged with assaulting his brother with a deadly weapon. There is no dispute about his identity. The main issue for trial is whether or not he intended to cause serious harm to his brother. The prosecutor wants to introduce a video taken of Lorne at his brother's wedding, three years earlier. Lorne, in a brunken rage, lunged at his brother with a steak knife, screaming that he would *ill him. Since the weapon in this case is also a knife, the prosecutor feels the video shows that Lorne has murderous intent toward his brother and uses knives as weapons.
Would the video evidence be helpful to proving the case?
Answer:
this isnt enough evedince as someone who is d runk cant control all of there body functionss, when d runk someone can do/say things they wouldnt normally say or do.
Explanation:
Answer:
since there is evidence that people can control all of their body when dr unk this case should not escalate into a full blow trial the is not a proven fact that when dr Unk you have no control this is a rather a simple matter of a family feud
the video would not be help full
Explanation:
________________ involves both parties in a civil case coming together to settle their dispute, without a trial, through an arbitrator.
A. Arbitration
B. Summary Judgment
C. Mediation
D. Compensation
Answer:
The Answer is C. Mediation
Explanation:
In mediation, the two parties come together to discuss terms that they would agree to as a way to settle their dispute. ... Unlike court cases and arbitration, where the parties may be bound by law to follow a ruling they don't agree with, parties in mediation only become bound by what they agree is fair.
QUESTION 1
Crimes that require specific intent fall into which category:
O The defendant intends to cause a certain bad result
O The defendant intends to do something more than commit the criminal act
O The defendant acts with knowledge that his or her conduct is illegal
O Any or all of the above
The apt response is choice (d). All of the aforementioned crimes require particular intent to be committed.
What does "particular intent" mean?In order to be convicted of a crime with specific intent, the defendant must knowingly do an act while intending to get a specific outcome out of it.
What crimes call for a special motive?Crimes with a specific intent are those that are intentionally committed to cause harm. Crimes with specific intent may include forgery, theft, robbery, and violence.
What category do crimes that call for specific intent fit into?Crimes requiring specific intent typically fall into one of three categories: either the defendant intends to do something other than commit the criminal act, the defendant intends to do something else, or the defendant acts with knowledge that his or her conduct is unlawful, which is known as scienter.
Learn more about Crimes: https://brainly.com/question/9336457
#SPJ13
A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based on state law, alleging that she was severely burned because the top flew off the pressure cooker during operation. Under the state law, a jury verdict does not have to be unanimous. However, a specific rule under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directly conflicts with the state law and provides that jury verdicts in federal court must be unanimous. Which statement correctly presents what law the federal judge should apply regarding the jury verdict
Answer:
The federal rule must apply in this case.
Explanation:
A federal court must, in fact, apply to state law when it has a case that was initiated under state law. However, when this case is also based on diversity of citizenship, a federal statute, or a federal rule, as shown in the case above, the court must apply the federal rule, provided that procedural rule does not interfere or deny any right, as shown in the case of the question above. Therefore, the court must apply federal rule.
Would slapping a counter count as assault or would it counter against the counter and cause the counter to get assault charges, I don't need them but I do need answers.
Answer:
a counter is an object, not a person therefore it can not press charges.
Explanation:
this is just illogical. you absolutely can not assault an object, it just isn't possile. nor can it press them against you.
Based on the graph, which statements are correct? Check all that apply.
Voters age 55–64 were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than people age 45–54.
Voters age 65 and older were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than all other age groups.
Men were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than women.
Voters with less than a high school education were less likely to use nontraditional voting methods than voters in all other educational groups.
Answer:
Based on the graph, which statements are correct? Check all that apply.
Voters age 55–64 were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than people age 45–54. {{{{{CORRECT}}}}} Voters age 65 and older were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than all other age groups.{{{{{CORRECT}}}}} Men were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than women. Voters with less than a high school education were less likely to use nontraditional voting methods than voters in all other educational groups.
Explanation:
October 2021 CORRECT on EDGE
The correct statements from the graph are 1. Voters aged 55–64 were ... and 2. Voters aged 65 and older were ...
The graph suggests that the likelihood of the 55–64 aged group using non-traditional voting methods is 69.7 against 65.9 scored by the 45–54 age group. Based on the graph, the age group with the highest likelihood to use non-traditional voting methods is voters aged 65 and older with 77.7.Thus, the graph shows that age influences voters to choose non-traditional voting methods over traditional methods.
Related link: https://brainly.com/question/21817767
Write a short essay on why you want a career in public safety and communications . specifically a 911 dispatcher
Who is involved of the New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What happened in the New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
How did the lower court rule in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What was the legal issue at hand to be decided in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What arguments ware given in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What precedents were cited in. New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What was the decision of the court in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
What was their reasoning in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
Were there any significant dissenting opinions in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?
1. We can see here that the case of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. involved: The State of New Jersey and T.L.O.
2. It is clear that the Supreme Court of the United States actually addressed the subject of students' Fourth Amendment rights against irrational searches and seizures in the landmark case of New Jersey v. T.L.O.
3. We can point out that the New Jersey Superior Court, the lower court, had found in the state's favor, concluding that the search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook was appropriate in the circumstances.
What is a legal issue?We can actually defined a legal issue as a disagreement that exists between the parties in a case that has a specific legal topic that needs to be decided by a court or other legal body.
4. We can see that in the New Jersey v. T.L.O., the legal question was actually citing whether school employees' search of T.L.O.'s purse violated the Fourth Amendment's ban on unjustified searches and seizures.
5. We see that the main arguments raised in the case was whether the search of T.L.O.'s purse qualified as a Fourth Amendment reasonable search.
6. We can point out that The Fourth Amendment's safeguards do not apply the same manner in schools as they do in other circumstances, according to the Supreme Court's prior finding in the case of Ingraham v. Wright, which was referenced in support of its reasoning.
Learn more about legal issues on https://brainly.com/question/30663289
#SPJ1
attach evidence of the organization involvement in the community
Attach evidence of the organization involved in the community it could be photographs or pictures.
Attach evidence of your organization's involvement in the community. B. Photographs, photographs, brochures, etc.: Attach evidence of your organization's involvement in the community. Examples: photos, brochures, etc.
Similarly, an organization's impact on a community can be positive or negative. One of the ways organizations influences communities has to do with social stratification. This is how society divides people into hierarchies or categories. Social stratification primarily refers to socioeconomic status.
Examples of community involvement include working with local schools, neighborhood associations, governments, non-profit organizations, volunteering, or making donations.
Learn more about the community at
https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ4
Insurance that will pay for injury to another driver and/or damage to their car if you are in an accident is called...
When insurance pays for injury to another driver and the damage to their car if you cause an accident, this is Liability Insurance.
What is liability insurance?This is a type of insurance that covers you and people involved in accidents if you are the cause of that accident.
Premiums for such plans are generally higher as they involve paying out for more than one person when claimed.
Find out more on liability insurance at https://brainly.com/question/11464345
#SPJ1
Which organization matches victims with lawyers who specialize in appealing cases
in higher courts?
the Innocence Project
the Center on Wrongful Convictions
Witness to Innocence
the Innocence Convention
Answer:the innocence project
Explanation:
The Innocence Project: organization matches victims with lawyers who specialize in appealing cases in higher courts. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization based at Yeshiva University's Cardozo School of Law that aims to clear the names of wrongfully imprisoned people using DNA testing and other scientific developments while also overhauling the criminal justice system to end future injustice.
The majority of the Innocence Project's work is concentrated on instances involving sexual assault or murder when DNA evidence (such as blood or other body fluids) is crucial to the case. 15% of all exonerations in the US are DNA exonerations, which is a small percentage.
Learn more about the Innocence Project here:
https://brainly.com/question/30372508
#SPJ1
According to John Locke, an English political philosopher of the seventeenth
century, nobody has natural rights to life, liberty, and property is it true or false
Describe the evolution of the terms detective and crime-scene investigator.
Answer:
What is the difference between a homicide detective and a crime scene investigator, according to Ryan's email?
A homicide detective and a crime scene investigator are frequently mistaken for one another. A crime scene is frequently depicted in the media, on television, and in movies, in which a detective pulls a pen from his pocket and begins poking around the body. Many police departments train officers and detectives to work as crime scene investigators and vice versa. With the introduction of scientific procedures for preserving and processing the crime scene, the number of Crime Scene Investigation units began to increase. A detective gathers information gathered by crime scene investigators, which is expected to aid them in apprehending the criminal. Both detective and crime scene investigator occupations, as well as law enforcement, fall within the criminal justice system umbrella, but they should not be confused.
Explanation:
Under the 4th Amendment, the police
can NOT do which of the following?
A. Search your vehicle for drugs if they see them in plain
sight during a traffic stop.
B. Search your home with a warrant signed by a judge.
C. Search your home for evidence of a crime with no
warrant.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Its C because if the police search your of a crime with no warrant the police cant search any premisis with a warant
Answer: C
Explanation:
Under the 4th Amendment, law enforcement cannot search personal property (for example, home, vehicle, etc.) without a warrant.
If you are using your high beams at night, you should remember to do what? A. Flicker them constantly B. Tailgate cars C. Switch to low beams for oncoming traffic D. Also turn on the fog lights
Answer: C switch to low beams for oncoming traffic
Explanation:
One thing to remember while using your high beams at night is to switch to low beams for oncoming traffic.
High beam lightHigh beams are a narrower beam that gives better distance, but less peripheral illumination. High beam light on cars makes sure that both sides of the road, as well as the distance ahead, are illuminated.
Use of High beam lightHigh beam light are preferrably used when driving in rural areas and on open highways away from urban and metropolitan areas. It can be even used if you need to see further ahead, even if there are street lights. Switching to low beams for oncoming traffic prevents any accident by causing direct light to person coming from opposite direction.
Thus, one thing to remember while using your high beams at night is to switch to low beams for oncoming traffic.
Learn more from here - brainly.com/question/17883296
#SPJ2
Cross examination on Sam smith
To answer the cross-examination questions, you can begin thus:
No, it is not true that I was riding my bike on the sidewalk at 7pm on April 23rd.
No, my bike is not my only mode of transportation.
Yes, I was heading home.
On April 23rd it is not a fact that I was crossing the intersection of Elm Street & 3rd.
What is cross-examination?A cross-examination is a series of questions that are meant to verify the truthfulness of answers previously given. A cross-examination can help a person uncover the truth of a situation or a lie that they have been previously told.
In the above cross-examination, the respondent's answers to the questions will help to understand the truth.
Learn more about cross-examination here:
https://brainly.com/question/9010663
#SPJ1
Cross-examination of Sam Smith
Isn’t it true that you were riding your bike on the sidewalk at 7pm on April 23rd?
Your bike is your only mode of transportation. Correct?
You were heading home. correct?
On April 23rd isn’t it a fact that you were crossing the intersection of Elm Street & 3rd
grievances made in emmanuel remi aiyede's article on nigeria's federal system and attempts made to solve the problem as stated in the article
Answer:Nigeria is a troubled federation. Its federal character has been a subject of debate since the return to democratic rule in 1999. Various groups have claimed to be marginalised and not sufficiently represented in the central offices of the national government. Some say it’s not even a federation so much as a unitary state, created by the military.
The oil-producing communities of the Niger Delta are among the groups that have militated for change. They feel neglected in development and dissatisfied with environmental degradation. Their call is for control of the wealth from resources in their region.
Some state governors who felt shortchanged by the federal structure have also called for ‘true federalism’. These states, largely from the southern part of the country, argue that the federation favours parts of the country that produced key actors in the military regimes. Even President Muhammadu Buhari has made this call.
Other groups, like the Arewa Consultative Forum (Hausa-Fulani), Afenifere (Yoruba) and Ohaneze (Igbo), also insist on federal restructuring. Some have called for a return to the regions of the 1950s, others for secession and the establishment of Biafra or Oduduwa republics.
The Conversation is a news organization dedicated to facts and evidence
Calls for federal restructuring have become a way of expressing dissatisfaction with poor economic performance and misgovernance in Nigeria. On the other hand, even elite groups, who mobilise as ethnic factions and compete for power and resources, point to the country’s poor performance as evidence that the federal structure is not working.
Misgovernance and poor economic development are visible in deplorable infrastructure, high youth unemployment, widespread poverty and conflicts. In 2018, Nigeria overtook India as the country with the highest number of poor people. Banditry, insurgency and religious extremism have multiplied.
Nigerians may agree that the federal system hinders the country’s progress. But they haven’t agreed on how to change it. No structural changes have been made since the return to democratic rule in 1999.
Explanation:
PAY NO ATTENTION
TO THE MAN OUTSIDE,
SENATOR
LOBBYIST
b. What is this cartoon suggesting about lobbyists?
Answer:
Lobbyist do not care about the voters. (The voter is outside, looking in through the window)
Explanation:
A lobbyist is a person who is employed by and acts for an organized interest group or corporation to try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and legislative branches.
Out of these four personal traits—integrity, loyalty, dependability, and punctuality—which do you think is more important for a criminal justice professional and why?
I NEED HELP RIGHT AWAY
Integrity is the most important personal trait for a criminal justice professional, as it ensures honesty, ethics, and impartiality in upholding the law and serving justice.
What Personal Trait is more important for a criminal justice professional?Integrity is the most crucial personal trait for a criminal justice professional. It encompasses honesty, ethics, and a commitment to upholding the law and serving justice impartially.
A professional with integrity builds trust, maintains credibility, and ensures fairness in the criminal justice system. It is the foundation upon which all other traits, such as loyalty, dependability, and punctuality, can be effectively exercised, as integrity ensures adherence to ethical standards and a steadfast dedication to the pursuit of justice.
Learn more about Personal Trait on:
https://brainly.com/question/29969358
#SPJ1