Answers
True, If a strand of hair is observed to have crown-like scales, it is most likely human.
Define the features of human hair?A hair can be defined as a slender, thread-like outgrowth from a follicle in the skin of mammals
Hair is defined as a protein filament that grows through the epidermis from follicles deep within the dermis.
Most common interest in hair is focused on hair growth, hair types and hair care, but hair is also an important biomaterial primarily composed of protein, notably keratin.
Hair can be divided into three parts length-wise:
(a) the bulb, a swelling at the hair base which originates from the dermis.
(b) the root, which is the hair lying beneath the skin surface.
(c) the shaft, which is the hair above the skin surface.
In cross-section, there are also three parts:
(a) the medulla, an area in the core which contains loose cells and air spaces
(b) the cortex, which contains densely packed keratin
(c) the cuticle, which is a single layer of cells arranged like roof shingles.
Learn more about hair here:
https://brainly.com/question/29580230
#SPJ2
Related Questions
the critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Answers
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
What qualifications, certifications, degrees, and/or education does being a lawyer require
Answers
Of the following, which is not an exemption from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act? Matters of National Defense. Trade Secrets. Banking Audits. Medical Files. None of the above. Albert, a resident of Montana, gets into a traffic accident in Colorado. Colorado: Can assert jurisdiction over Albert under its long arm statute because the minimum contacts requirement is met Cannot assert jurisdiction over Albert under its long arm statute because the minimum contacts requirement is not met Cannot assert jurisdiction over Albert unless over $75,00.00 is a stake None of the above Maine passes a law prohibiting the importation of out-ofstate baitfish because authorities cannot be certain that imported fish would be free of "parasites and nonnative species" that might pose environmental harm to local ecology. If this law is challenged by an out of state supplier of baitfish, the plaintiff will: Prevail, if the court finds that it furthers a legitimate state interest and there are no reasonable alternatives Lose, if the court finds that it furthers a legitimate state interest and there are no reasonable alternatives Lose because the state is acting as a market participant Prevail, because the state is favoring its own baitfish suppliers
Answers
The exemption from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act that is not included is "None of the above." Colorado cannot assert jurisdiction over Albert due to the minimum contacts requirement. If Maine's law furthers a legitimate state interest without reasonable alternatives, the plaintiff will lose.
None of the above from the given options qualifies as an exemption from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. None of the alternatives offered are covered by the Act's exemptions from disclosure.
The right response for Colorado's jurisdiction over Albert is "Cannot assert jurisdiction over Albert under its long arm statute because the requirement for minimum contacts is not met." Colorado cannot use its long arm statute to claim jurisdiction over Albert if the minimal contacts requirement is not met.
The correct response is "Lose, if the court finds that it furthers a legitimate state interest and there are no reasonable alternatives," in the case of the challenge to Maine's law banning the importation of out-of-state baitfish. The plaintiff challenging the law would lose the case if the court determined that the law furthers a valid state interest and that there are no workable alternatives.
Learn more about Freedom of Information Act at:
brainly.com/question/510696
#SPJ4
Which of these le an example of eminent domain?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.
discuss the grieved lands of africa as a dramatic monologue
Answers
Answer:
The Grieved Lands of Africa” therefore is suggestive of the several centuries the Africa continent was in the servitude of another continent; maimed, exploited, stripped of her humanity, her people taken as slaves any which way. The slavery itself is relative especially during the colonial era.
Describe the role conflict that exists for treatment professionals.
Answers
In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:
Unclear Job Expectations.Poor Communication.Toxic Work Environment.What is the concept of role conflict?Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.
A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.
Learn more about role conflict, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13603130
#SPJ1
a rational theory of a crime is based on a) inductive reasoning b) deductive reasoning c) analogical reasoning d) syllogistic reasoning
Answers
The rational theory of a crime is based on: b) deductive reasoning. So, option b is correct.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises. In the context of a rational theory of a crime, deductive reasoning is used to examine the motivations, decision-making process, and thought patterns of individuals who engage in criminal behavior. It involves starting with general principles or assumptions about human behavior and applying them to a specific situation to draw conclusions about the individual's reasoning behind committing the crime.
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, while analogical reasoning involves making comparisons between similar situations or cases. Syllogistic reasoning refers to a form of deductive reasoning that involves drawing specific conclusions from two or more premises. However, in the context of a rational theory of crime, deductive reasoning is the primary mode of reasoning used to understand the underlying motivations and reasoning behind criminal acts. So, option b is correct.
To learn more about deductive reasoning, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7284582
#SPJ11
In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, debtors retain most of their assets and agree to payments on their debts, most of which are discharged within three years. True/False
Answers
The statement "in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, debtors retain most of their assets and agree to payments on their debts, most of which are discharged within three years" is false.
Chapter 13 bankruptcy, also known as a wage earner's plan, allows individuals with a regular income to reorganize their debts while keeping their property.
Under Chapter 13, debtors propose a repayment plan to the court, which outlines how they will repay their creditors over a specified period of time. The repayment plan usually lasts between three to five years, depending on the debtor's income and ability to make payments.
During this time, debtors make regular payments to a bankruptcy trustee who distributes the funds to creditors according to the plan.
The repayment plan in Chapter 13 bankruptcy can encompass various types of debts, such as mortgage arrears, car loans, tax debts, and certain unsecured debts.
The plan is designed to prioritize certain debts over others, ensuring that essential debts are paid while other debts may be reduced or discharged altogether.
At the end of the repayment period, if debtors have made all the required payments and fulfilled their obligations under the plan, any remaining eligible debts are typically discharged.
However, it's important to note that not all debts are dischargeable, and certain obligations like child support, alimony, most tax debts, and student loans are generally not discharged through Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
In summary, the statement that most debts are discharged within three years in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy is false.
To know more about Chapter 13 bankruptcy, refer to the link :
https://brainly.com/question/1228459#
#SPJ11
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answers
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?
Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white collar crime.
Answers
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
Rojan (Roy) worked for the Metropolis City Government. One day at work a co-worker approached him and asked whom he planned to vote for as mayor in the next election. Roy told his colleague that he didn't think much of either candidate, and he didn't plan on voting for either one. The next day Roy's boss fired him because he felt that Roy should not have expressed any negative views about elected officials. Roy plans to file a lawsuit against the city based on its violation of his federal constitutional freedom of speech right. If Roy files his lawsuit in federal district court ( Rojan Degoey v. Metropolis City):________
a. The court may hear his case based on federal-question jurisdiction.
b. The court may hear his case based on diversity jurisdiction.
c. The court cannot hear his case because it does not have jurisdiction of this matter.
d. A and B only.
Answers
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
Explanation:
For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of discretionary spending? For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of mandatory spending? Defense spending Medicare Science spending For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of mandatory spending? Social Security Medicare Interest on the national debt Education spending Which type of spending currently takes up a larger proportion of the U.S. federal budget? Mandatory spending and discretionary spending take up an equal amount Mandatory spending Discretionary spending
Answers
For the U.S. government, defense spending and science spending are examples of discretionary spending, while Medicare is NOT an example of discretionary spending.
Discretionary spending refers to the portion of the budget that is determined through the annual appropriations process and can be adjusted by Congress. Examples include defense spending, science spending, and education spending.
For the U.S. government, Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the national debt are examples of mandatory spending, while education spending is NOT an example of mandatory spending.
Mandatory spending is the spending on programs that are required by law, and their budgets are not subject to the annual appropriations process. Examples include Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the national debt.
In terms of the proportion of the U.S. federal budget, mandatory spending currently takes up a larger proportion compared to discretionary spending. Mandatory spending includes programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which together make up a significant portion of the budget.
Discretionary spending, on the other hand, is subject to annual appropriations and is more flexible, but typically accounts for a smaller proportion of the budget.
To know more about discretionary spending refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12602941#
#SPJ11
A blood droplet has a width of 5 mm and a length of 6 mm. What is the
angle of impact?
Answers
Explanation:
56 degree angle.
llanhon
Lame an
F
RS, ADA AND WAIVERS
1. The nature and scope of one's property Interest in a trademark generally is the right to prevent
consumer confusion. U
2. Rights in a registered trademark exist indefinitely as long as the mark continues to be used.
3. Public policy dictates that in the United States free market capitalist system, any entrepreneur may
profit by registering a domain name (cybersquatting) that is confusingly similar to a registered or
unregistered mark, or dilutes, a famous mark without liability.
т
Jotes' Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men's Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the "author of
the work" -- without their performance on the field there wouldn't be a game to broadcast. DF
7. The trademark laws are put in place to protect more the public rather than the trademark. BD
8. A waiver is a contract that releases an organization from liability for harms caused by ordinary
negligence in exchange for the ability to participate in an activity.
Otection under the Lanham
untenable claim. ETW aks
talking trademark. Images
nark because they do not
not distingunh and identify
irk because there are unde
ken by countless photograph
hich have been published in
it the world. No reasonable
do.
F
9. Waivers never hold up in the court of law.
F
v. Maomillan, Inc., 894
fledged that "lu]nder vor
trademark -- if, for ex
ecific goods."
10. A parent who signs a waiver for their child has signed away the right of the child to sue.
T
11. An athlete with a disability will always have a claim to participate as the Supreme Court has
determined that sport is a major life activity.
F
Organize all these with which answers do you think it's right and correct them need this ASAP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Jotes’ Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men’s Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the “author of
the work” — without their performance on the field there wouldn’t be a game to broadcast. DF
Which of the following is a question of fact?
A. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
B. Whether pre-meditation is necessary for a first-degree murder conviction.
C. Whether speech is protected by the First Amendment.
D. What is necessary for service of process?
E. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light and also what is necessary for service of process?
Answers
The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means
Question of Fact is simply known as when a speaker wants to persuade people about how to interpret facts that was presented.In law, question of fact, focus on questions that must be answered by the act of one's reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising drawn from those facts. it is also known as a question for the jury in a jury trial or for the judge in a bench trial. Fact questions are evidentiary questions in nature and are often concern with who, what, where, and when.From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct
Learn more about question of fact from:
https://brainly.com/question/13857186
What formal power would the president use to enact an economic stimulus bill?
Answers
Answer:
Executive powers
Explanation:
Executive powers are held by the president of the United States, and has a part in the decision of passing bills to make them laws.
Hope I helped.
What is the prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime? Can a corpus delicti be proven by a confession or admission of a defendant? Explain your response.
Answers
Answer:
The prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime is to provide sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.
According to the EVIDENCE § 640 (11th ed. 1935), corpus delicti cannot be proven by a defendant's confession or admission. It remains the responsibility of the prosecution to provide enough evidence for the commission of a crime. It is only a defendant's voluntary confession that can be admitted as evidence. However, each judge is expected to weigh the confessional evidence.
Explanation:
Corpus delicti refers to a criminal justice principle that requires sufficient facts to be gathered as evidence to prove that a crime had been committed. This implies that corpus delicti is the body of evidence or facts and not a dead body as wrongfully construed sometimes.
how can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answers
Answer: When a victim complains about an incident, the police officers do the right thing like getting all the information about the incident. But, the principles of Ubuntu is not about what is right, it is about what is ethical to do. The people should treat the victims respectfully and they should be given more empathy.
3 things that the Democratic party stands for today?
Answers
Answer:
Ideological social elements in the party include cultural liberalism, civil libertarianism, and feminism
Explanation:
Some Democratic social policies are immigration reform, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights. Some Democratic social policies are immigration reform, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights.
A and B own Blackacre as tenants in common. Each agrees in writing never to seek partition. A sues for partition. What result?
Answers
A's lawsuit for partition will likely be unsuccessful. This is because both A and B had agreed in writing never to seek partition, which means that they had made a legally binding agreement not to divide or sell the property.
Tenants in common own equal shares of a property and have the right to possession and use of the entire property. However, each tenant in common also has the right to seek partition, which means to divide or sell the property. In this case, both A and B had agreed in writing never to seek partition, which would prevent either of them from dividing or selling the property without the other's consent.
By suing for partition, A is essentially violating the agreement that was made with B. As a result, A's lawsuit for partition may not be successful, and the court may order A to abide by the previous agreement not to seek partition.
Learn more about the right to possession: https://brainly.com/question/30238136
#SPJ11
a real estate contract requires certain features to be legally binding and enforceable. three of the four features below meet these requirements. which one does not?
Answers
A real estate contract requires the following features to be legally binding and enforceable: mutual agreement, consideration, capacity, and legality. Three of these features, mutual agreement, consideration, and legality, meet the requirements. Capacity, the ability of both parties to enter into a contract, is also necessary.
Therefore, the feature that does not meet the requirements is the absence of capacity.
"A real estate contract requires certain features to be legally binding and enforceable. Three of the four features below meet these requirements. Which one does not?"
The four features of a real estate contract that are required for it to be legally binding and enforceable are mutual agreement, consideration, competent parties, and lawful purpose. Out of these four features, the one that does not meet these requirements is "lawful purpose" because a real estate contract with an unlawful purpose cannot be legally binding or enforceable.
To know more about lawful purpose Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16041175
#SPJ11
Hooke's law describes the force of _____.
Answers
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is equal to the negative of the spring's stiffness (k) multiplied by the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position: F = -kx.
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is a result of the spring's stiffness (k) and the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position. The force is proportional to the displacement, and can be expressed as F = -kx, where k is the stiffness of the spring and x is the displacement from equilibrium.
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is equal to the negative of the spring's stiffness (k) multiplied by the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position: F = -kx.
learn more about law here
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
Craig is a salesperson for the local TV station. Which deduction will he be unable to claim on his 2022 tax return?
Answers
To claim a deduction on his tax return, Craig will need to have incurred expenses that are directly related to his job as a salesperson and that are not reimbursed by his employer. He will also need to be able to provide documentation of these expenses, such as receipts or other proof of payment.
Some common deductions that may be available to Craig as a salesperson include expenses for travel, meals, entertainment, and other business-related expenses. However, to determine which deductions Craig will be able to claim on his 2022 tax return, it will be necessary for him to review the specific rules and requirements for claiming deductions and to consult with a tax professional or refer to tax resources.
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.VSuppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
Answers
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
The above scenario is an example of what?
Answer:
Negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, the operators' neglect to adjust the scale properly to ensure the proper functioning and accuracy of weighing resulted in the exposure of incorrect information that hindered the transportation and sale of a certain product. This is a case of Negligent misrepresentation, since there was a display of a false statement due to imprudence, a negligence.
A LAN B RANDIS ARRIVED AT THE G OLDEN F OX RESTAURANT for a Friday-night fish fry. During his meal, a severe thunderstorm began, which caused the ceiling of the men’s restroom to leak. After finishing his meal, Alan entered the men’s room to wash his hands. He slipped on some wet tile, which was caused by the leak in the roof. Alan struck his head during the fall and was severely injured. One week later, Alan’s attorney contacted the owners of the Golden Fox with a claim for damages. The restaurant owners maintained the fall was not their responsibility, claiming they were not the insurers of guest safety. While the owners knew of the condition of the roof, they said it leaked only during extremely heavy thunderstorms and was too old to fix without undue economic hardship. Most important, because the storm was not within their
control, the owners maintained that it was not reasonable to assume they could have foreseen the severity of the storm, and thus they could not be held liable for the accident.
1. Was the severity of the storm a foreseeable event?
Answers
Yes the severity of the storm can be said to be a foreseeable event.
What is a foreseeable event?This is the term that is used in law to show that a person would have had to be able to anticipate the occurrence of something. That is, something is bound or likely to happen given certain things. This is one of the questions that can be found in the contract law as well as in the tort law.
This is a foreseeable event based on the fact that it was expected that such an event was going to have to happen. That is, the building already had issues. This was bound to occur. The business owed the customers the duty of care of having to put the place in order to avoid issues that may spring up such as the one that we have here.
Therefore in order to determine if the storm was a foreseeable event, we would say yes. The natural elements cannot really be controlled hence one has to make the measures that would take care of such situations.
Read more on foreseeable events here: https://brainly.com/question/17462805
#SPJ1
What document outlines the health and safety related procedures programs follow?.
Answers
This emphasis on worker participation is consistent with the OSH Act, OSHA standards, and OSHA enforcement policies and procedures, which recognize the rights and roles of workers and their representatives in matters of workplace safety and health.
It could reduce its enforcement of private assets rights. I can see where in the neighborhood regulation enforcement human beings wouldn't be thrilled with those folks searching over their shoulder and pushing them. If he became going to be critical in approximately full-time law enforcement, he needs to decide to do it properly.
Enforcement motion manner a movement taken with the aid of the department upon its own initiative or at the request of an affected birthday celebration in furtherance of its statutory authority and obligation to execute and ensure compliance with relevant laws.
Enforcement is the proper execution of the system of making sure compliance with legal guidelines, regulations, guidelines, standards, and social norms.
Learn more about enforcement here https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ4
This emphasis on health and safety employee participation is regular with the OSH Act, OSHA standards, and OSHA enforcement documents and strategies, which recognize the rights and roles of employees and their representatives in matters of workplace safety and health.
It is able to reduce its enforcement of private belongings rights. I will see which within the neighborhood law enforcement safety and health wouldn't be thrilled with those parents looking over their shoulders and pushing them. If he has become going to be vital in approximately complete-time regulation enforcement, he wishes to determine to do it nicely.
Enforcement motion way a movement all in favor of the document of the branch upon its own initiative or at the request of an affected celebration in furtherance of its statutory authority and duty to execute and make sure compliance with applicable legal guidelines.
Learn more about health and safety here:- https://brainly.com/question/5496881
#SPJ4
If the defendant successfully proves __________, no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence, the plaintiff will be denied any recovery of damages. a. negligence per se b. comparative negligence c. contributory negligence d. res ipsa loquitur
Answers
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
Provide TWO (2) examples or situations that
prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less
stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing
country (e.g., laws r
Answers
TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.
Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.
Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.
It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.
Learn more about tax loopholes
https://brainly.com/question/7227568
#SPJ11
who is the first president of america?
Answers
How productive have the 111th, 112th, and the 113th Congresses been in comparison to all of the rest in modern history?
Per Frank Luntz, when did President Obama have “the chance to change the political culture in D.C.?” Additionally, why, specifically, did he lose that chance (what happened)?
What do the Republicans realize they can do to keep Obama from fulfilling his campaign promises? Why does this matter in the long-term for his presidency?
Regarding the stimulus package – what are each of the sides pushing to get included? What happens to the Republican requests, and how do they ultimately respond?
What brought on the creation of the Tea Party?
How did the average American feel about Obamacare, include some of their fears?
Judgement vs. character – per VP Biden, why would it be worse to attack one and not the other?
Describe the decision and the election process changes that take place in 2010?
What is the ‘Grand Bargain’ and ultimately how are things sorted out? Be specific.
How does the ‘Gang of Six’ effect the results of the Grand Bargain?
Tea Party members, and eventually all House republicans, take what actions in response to their dealings with Obamacare?
The 2014 election became a major turning point in national politics. What are the results of this election?
What does Frank Luntz predict for the future of the United States?
Why did Donald J. Trump win the 2016 presidential election? Give supporting details.
Opinion: Where do we go from here as a divided, polarized, and deeply troubled “house”? If you were in charge, what changes would you make to preserve our union?
Answers
What brought on the creation of the Tea Party?The bailouts of banks by the Bush and Obama administrations triggered the Tea Party's rise, according to political analyst Scott Rasmussen.
What do the Republicans realize they can do to keep Obama from fulfilling his campaign promises? Why does this matter in the long-term for his presidency?A large part of Obama’s appeal to independents and moderates was his promise to reduce the level of partisanship in Washington. Unfortunately for him, he couldn’t deliver bipartisanship on his own, and (so runs the argument), the Republicans’ decision to oppose his every initiative, starting on Day One, made it impossible for him to redeem his pledge. The Republicans gambled that because Obama and the Democrats controlled the entire government, they would be blamed for continuing partisan wrangling. And the Republicans turned out to be right. Although it was not Obama’s fault, the public focused their discontent with continuing partisan rancor focused nonetheless on him and the Democratic leadership, not on the real source of their disappointment.