If a bill is submitted to the president within 10 days of the end of the congressional session and he/she takes no action on the bill this is referred to as a pocket veto, the bill does not become law.
The veto is the president's authority to reject a bill or joint resolution and halt its passage into law. A measure enacted by Congress must be signed by the president within 10 days. In the case of a conventional veto, the President sends the piece of legislation back to the house where it was first introduced, usually with a message outlining his or her reasons. Only a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House is required to override this veto. In this case, despite the President's objections, the bill becomes a law. When Congress adjourns during the ten-day timeframe, a pocket veto happens. The bill cannot be sent back to Congress by the president.
Learn more on law
https://brainly.com/question/29553499
#SPJ4
Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
Answer:
pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States
Explanation:
The First Amendment is the right to freedom of speech, religion and the right to peacefully assemble.
Do "You" believe there should be limitations on each or any of these rights"
Answer:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Explanation:
The mayor and city council have a secret meeting to pass a law requiring citizens to pay a special tax for new sewer lines. Which characteristic of rule of law was violated in this situation?
Accountability to the law
Transparency of institutions
Decisions based on the law
Consistent application
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Transparency of institutions
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
DEPPRESSION DECEMBER "WOO HOO"
Answer:
dang, thanks for free points tho
Explanation:
Answer:
Free answer dude-
Explanation:
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
Do you believe that there are too many lawsuits in the United States? If so, do you place more blame for the problem on lawyers or on individuals who go to court? Is there anything that would help the problem?
What if any are the positive outcomes of lawsuits?
Answer:
do a protest
Explanation:
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
Identify the exceptions to a search warrant when conducting a search for evidence
Answer:they cannot go into locked safes briefcases etc. They can enter locked rooms though and they will.
Explanation:
what are the consequences to a silent partner in a partnership when the partnership is unable to pay off debt
Answer:
When a partnership can not pay of it's debt, they can get sued by the person they owe the debt to.
Which of the following actions is illegal for selling alcohol
Answer:
no options
Explanation:
A nurse assesses the third-degree perineal laceration of a postpartum woman. Which assessment findings would concern the nurse?
Select all that apply.
Edema noted
A fleshy odor
Absence of ecchymosis
Small hemorrhoid at anus
Stitches are not well approximated
From the given options, the assessment findings that would concern the nurse regarding a third-degree perineal laceration of a postpartum woman are.
Edema noted: Edema, or swelling, around the perineal area can indicate inflammation or poor healing.
A fleshy odor: An odor from the perineal area can be a sign of infection or poor wound healing.
Stitches are not well approximated: Poor approximation of stitches suggests inadequate wound closure, which can lead to complications such as delayed healing or increased risk of infection.
The following options would not typically be concerning in this context:
Absence of ecchymosis: Ecchymosis refers to bruising, and its absence is generally a positive finding indicating that there is no significant bruising in the perineal area.
Small hemorrhoid at anus: While a small hemorrhoid at the anus may be present, it is not directly related to the assessment of the perineal laceration and would not be a major concern in this context.
It's important to note that any concerns regarding the assessment findings should be further evaluated and addressed by a healthcare professional.
To learn more about postpartum woman, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32809066
#SPJ11
If you had to choose between (1) killing one person to save the lives of five others and (2) doing nothing, even though you knew that five people would die right before your eyes if you did nothing—what would you do? What would be the right thing to do? (Trolleycar example).
Answer: 1
Explanation: A defensive position on the first option, would be to argue that in certain life and death scenarios, taking difficult and morally complex actions may be necessary to save the lives of innocent people. From this point of view, the right thing to do would be to save as many lives as possible, in this particular case, even if it means taking one life to save five. This perspective, known as Utilitarianism, emphasizes on the principle of maximizing overall happiness and well-being, in this case, saving five lives is considered to be more valuable than taking one life.
One could also argue that in such a situation, where time is of the essence and action is required, one must weigh the immediate loss of one life against the potential loss of five lives and act in a way that minimizes loss of life. It's also important to note that this action should be taken only if there is no other alternative and every other possible solution has been exhausted.
Moreover, as with any action that has moral implications, it's crucial to be transparent and accountable for the consequences that arise from it. and to consider the potential long-term implications of the decision that is made.
It's important to keep in mind that this is a thought experiment and in reality, decision making under such scenarios could be much more complex and harder to navigate. And it may require the input of multiple experts and professionals to evaluate different options and make a responsible decision.
Explain the concept of "field training" for police officers. When does it begin and what is the primary purpose for the training?
Answer:
"Field Training" is usually hosted after the Police Academy. For example if you take a look at the Los Angeles Police Department the officers in training are long sleeves with neckties. They are to be at a close watch of a T.O (Training Officer) which means that the T.O is to supervise them during a 10-95 (Traffic Stop), 10-32 (Backup Required) calls and evaluating their Code-3 (Lights and Siren) response. If there are shots fired during the course of the Field Training the Trainee is to act as a full rank officer and begin assisting and protecting him/herself and the Training Officer.
this question has me very confused help plzzzz
What 13 member committee in the House provides a bill with a calendar date and
may speed up, delay, or even prevent action on a bill to go to the floor of the House of
Representatives?
(A) Ways and Means
(B) Budget
(C) Rules
(D) Committee of the Whole
When police have substantial time to obtain an arrest warrant and there is probable cause but no exigency, the Fourth Amendment requires that they obtain an arrest warrant to lawfully seize the person in a public place.
Answer:
This statement is true
Explanation:
This statement is true. The police may search an individual in a public place but the individual has the right to refuse this search. This is where the Fourth amendment right comes into play. This right basically protects the individual from police abuse by preventing police from being able to search them or seize any of their belongings. This is unless they have a warrant which was issued by a court due to the police having probable cause that can be proven.
Rich and Archie sign an agreement in which Archie agrees to deliver ten cases of champagne in 5 days. The parties negotiated and meant to say in the written agreement, delivery in 50 days. If the evidence is clear that the two parties intended to agree to 50 days, the courts will probably
Answer:
Reform the contract
Explanation:
Contract reformation means that both parties, in this case, Rich and Archie, ask the courts to rewrite the contract or make a change in a specific part of the contract to express what both of the parties want. Then, Rich and Archie would agree that Archie has to deliver ten cases of champagne in 50 days, not 5.
Several persons together stole a painting from an art museum. One of them, who was the driver, was caught during the commission of another crime. He told police that "I didn't even get any money from the art museum. It all went to the first guy and the second guy." When the first and second guy go on trial for the theft of the art painting, is the driver's statement admissible in court?
Answer:
If the driver's statement was voluntarily obtained by the police without duress, then the statement will be admissible. But, if otherwise, it cannot be admitted. Such self-incriminating statements are usually used as evidence for police to arrest a suspect, but to convict. This is why at the point of arrest, the suspect is read his or her "rights to remain silent."
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of the trial judge to determine any issues as to the statement's voluntariness. This implies that the confession can be admitted into evidence if the judge determines that the confession was voluntarily made by the driver. The judge will not admit the statement if it is determined that there were some use of threats of force, violence, or intimidation on the part of the police to obtain the self-incriminating confession.
Explain why each of these objectives is so important for transforming policing in South
Africa for a new era of “democratic policing”. In other words, explain how achieving each
of these objectives would help to make it possible for government to create what the White
Paper calls “democratic policing”.
[25 Marks]
To prepare Africa for a new era of "democratic policing" The new police force is making an effort to transform from a past of violent and indiscriminate violence into a respected democratic police force.
Has South Africa's community policing programme been a success?Due to financial support from residents and their willingness to stop crime, community policing has been most effective in wealthy (typically white) regions. Even yet, it might be challenging to gauge how it affects crime reduction.
What was the name of the first democratic law in South Africa?In order to oversee the transitional phase following the end of apartheid, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1993, often known as the Interim Constitution, was adopted. It first introduced universal adult suffrage, the cornerstone of a modern democracy.
To know more about democratic policing visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11460279
#SPJ1
What conflict exists when an mco provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests
A conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
What is the role of the MCOs?The Managed Care Organizations is an entity that provides financial incentives such as bonuses to physicians for reducing the number of tests, treatments and referrals to hospitals and specialists.
Therefore, the conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
Read more about MCOs
brainly.com/question/27034009
#SPJ1
The responsibility for transmitting the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals is
The transmission of the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals is the responsibility of the circuit clerk. The clerk is also responsible for furnishing the appellant with a docketing statement form.
The circuit clerk is responsible for sending the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals. According to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 11(b), the appellant must furnish the circuit clerk with a docketing statement form. In most cases, the record is forwarded to the appellate court within 10 days of the appeal. However, in some instances, the appellant must provide transcripts of the trial proceedings, which may take time.
The transmission of the record is crucial in that it provides the appellate court with an accurate representation of what transpired during the lower court proceedings. The record usually contains trial transcripts, evidence, exhibits, and pleadings. It is worth noting that the transmission of the record must be done within the stipulated time frame, which is usually 30 days after the notice of appeal is filed. Failure to adhere to this time frame may lead to the dismissal of the appeal.
Learn more about the court from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
Written defamation is _____; oral defamation is _______. Group of answer choices fraud; conversion conversion; fraud slander; libel libel; slander
Although elections can be very candidate-centered, for which of the following does the party organization often provide considerable support?
a) Voter data lists
b) Donor lists
c) Voter registration drives
d) Campaign funds
e) All of these are correct.
The party organization often provide considerable support to all of these Although elections can be very candidate-centered.
What does the political party do?A local party organization is a group in charge of a political party's operations at the city, county, or district levels but which is not registered as a district or local party committee with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Which of the following is the role of a political party that is most crucial?The primary goal of political parties is to nominate and elect as many people as possible to public office. Once in office, these representatives work to advance their party's objectives through legislation and program initiatives.
What crucial roles do political parties and elections play in the government, in your opinion?In the study of politics in developing nations, particularly in the study of democratization and, more specifically, the consolidation of democratic political regimes, political parties and elections play a significant role.
Know more about voter:
brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ4
Legal insanity is a state of contractual _____, as determined by law.
A.incapacity
B.mistake
C.nullification
D.confusion
E.misunderstanding
Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.
The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.
Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.
It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.
To know more about legal insanity
https://brainly.com/question/31445937
#SPJ11
Given that our scale is 1"=1'
How long would a line on your scale sketch be to represent a wall that is 10' long?
Que lo llevo hacer un gran ciclista a richard carapaz
Richard Carapaz is a great cyclist because :
His natural talent for cyclingHis hard work and dedicationHis mental strengthHow did Richard Carapaz become such a great cyclist ?Carapaz has continuously been a solid and quick cyclist, and he includes a natural capacity to climb slopes. Carapaz could be a exceptionally difficult laborer, and he is continuously seeking out for ways to progress his cycling. He puts in long hours of preparing, and he is continuously willing to thrust himself to the constrain.
Carapaz could be a exceptionally rationally intense cyclist, and he is able to remain centered and spurred indeed when things are intense. He incorporates a never-give-up demeanor, and he is continuously willing to battle for triumph.
Find out more on great cyclists at https://brainly.com/question/15980275
#SPJ4
a(n) ________ contract is one that unduly favors the party with superior bargaining power.
The statement is completed as: ''An unconscionable contract is one that unduly favors the party with superior bargaining power.'' An unconscionable contract is a unilateral and unfair agreement.
An unconscionable contract may contain terms that are excessively favorable to one party and excessively burdensome to the other. These terms may include hidden fees, unreasonable limitations of liability, or clauses that waive important legal rights. In such cases, the party with superior bargaining power is taking advantage of the weaker party.
To avoid entering into an unconscionable contract, it is important to carefully review any agreement before signing it, and to seek legal advice if necessary. If a court finds a contract to be unconscionable, it may declare some or all of the terms unenforceable, or may void the entire contract.
See more about unconscionable contract at https://brainly.com/question/29727579.
#SPJ11
A military spouse has relocated with his wife who is assigned to a duty station in Jacksonville. He has an active real estate license in New York. The spouse may be issue a ________ for 6 months.
Answer:
may be issue a temporary license for 6 months.
Explanation:
A military spouse has relocated with his wife who is assigned to a duty station in Jacksonville. He has an active real estate license in New York. The spouse may be issue a temporary license for 6 months.
A spouse of an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States may be issued a temporary license to practice a profession. The applicant’s spouse must be on active duty and assigned to a duty station in Jacksonville . The applicant must hold a valid license for the profession in another state, the District of Columbia, any United States territory or possession, or a foreign jurisdiction. The temporary license is valid for six months.
as a president who came to power without popular acceptance explain with five reasons how you can gain acceptability from your people
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
1. Reduce Taxes: by reducing the rate of taxes, the economic burden on the people will be reduced, thereby changing people's negative notions about me.
2. Creates direct employment: creating direct government employment will be seen as a good effort by the people as President that have their interest at heart, and is ready to eliminate unemployment.
3. Hold open forums and discuss with the people periodically: this will be a good platform for people to ask me about what they need, and getting a direct and positive response from me will definitely change their negative mind about me.
4. Creates enabling environments for businesses to thrive: a good enabling environment for businesses will, in turn, improve the standard of living of the people, thereby people will generally be happy.
5. Elevate economy through inclusive governmental policy: by ensuring every representative of the socio-political group is part of my administration, this will influence people to have a positive mind towards me.
Select the correct answer.
Which situation represents the direct benefits of taxing citizens?
A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
O B.
the price of smartphones and personal computers decreases
OC.
the number of African Americans serving on corporate boards of directors increases
O D. a Hispanic woman becomes the first woman entrepreneur in the construction industry
Answer: A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
Explanation: