The correct option that identifies a true statement about federal courts is B. Federal courts can hear cases that the U.S. Constitution has expressly put within their jurisdiction.
Federal courts, in general, possess the power to adjudicate cases and controversies relating to federal law, including constitutional interpretation, federal statutes and regulations, interstate and international commerce, and federal crimes.
However, it is critical to note that the federal courts have limited jurisdiction and can only hear specific types of cases that have been expressly put within their jurisdiction by the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Therefore, option B is correct.
Federal courts, in general, have jurisdiction over cases involving: Federal law and Constitutional interpretation Federal crimes Interstate and international commerce Bankruptcy Patent, copyright, and trademark law Federal tax law Public lands and natural resources Labor relations Federal civil rights The law of the sea Environmental law Alienage and citizenship issues Admiralty law International trade Law governing the Federal Government and its employees.
Learn more about federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/32017401
#SPJ11
How does the judicial branch examine the actions of administrative agencies?
Answer:
Federal courts routinely uphold very broad delegations of authority. When reviewing administrative agency actions, courts ask whether the agency afforded those under its jurisdiction due process of law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Does this help?
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
The judge ruled in favor of Sam. The statements made to the jury by Linda and Sam immediately after the jury was chosen were _____.
How would you explain gender differences in the crime rate ? Why do you think males are more violent than females?
Susan Bean, a citizen of Illinois, sued Wallis Turk, a citizen of the state of Colorado, for the breach of a construction contract on Bean’s new Chicago residence. More than $600,000 was at stake. Bean filed the suit in Illinois state court. Turk filed a motion to remove the case to the federal courts.
Will the case be heard in federal or state court?
The laws of each state establish state courts, which have extensive jurisdiction.
Cases involving everything from family law disputes to criminal matters can be heard in these courts. Federal courts, on the other hand, are established by the U.S. Constitution and have much more limited jurisdiction.
What distinguishes local, state, and federal courts?
State courts handle the majority of cases and interact with the general public more frequently than federal courts. Despite the fact that the federal courts hear fewer cases than the state courts, the cases that they do hear tend to be of greater national significance more frequently. Consider the court cases that you have heard about the most.
Learn more about Federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/25947870
#SPJ4
Franz Joseph Gull suggested that a person's what could predict their criminal tendencies?
Palm
Skull
O Personality
O Genetics
Answer:
skull
Explanation:
Answer: B. Skull
Explanation:
The 18th amendment caused the consumption of alcohol to question 21 options: - decrease, and total consumer expenditure on alcohol to decrease.
- increase, and total consumer expenditure on alcohol to increase.
- decrease, and total consumer expenditure on alcohol to increase.
- increase, and total consumer expenditure on alcohol to decrease.
The 18th Amendment, also known as the Prohibition Amendment, made the production, sale, and transportation of alcoholic beverages illegal in the United States.
Therefore, it is logical to assume that the consumption of alcohol would decrease due to its illegality. However, the reality was different. Prohibition led to an increase in illegal production and sale of alcohol, also known as bootlegging, which contributed to an increase in consumption. As the demand for illegal alcohol increased, so did the total consumer expenditure on alcohol, despite the higher prices. Therefore, the correct option is: increase, and total consumer expenditure on alcohol to increase.
To know more about Prohibition Amendment click here:
brainly.com/question/30484662
#SPJ4
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
Of the following, which is the least affected by legislation? Common Law Statutes Professional Codes Regulations Morallity
Common Law is the least affect-ed by legislation. Common law is the body of law created by jud-ges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by vir-tue of being stated in writ-ten opinions.
The Common law ref-ers to law and the correspond-ing legal sys-tem developed through deci-sions of courts and similar tri-bunals, rather than through legis-lative statutes or exe-cutive action. Common law, also kno-wn as case law, is a body of un-written laws based on legal prece-dents esta-blished by the courts. Common law draws from institution-alized opinions and inter-pretations from judicial author-ities and public juries. Common laws some-times prove the inspiration for new legis-lation to be enacted.
To know more about common law click below:
brainly.com/question/13610284
#SPJ4
for consideration to have "legally sufficient value," it must con-sist of goods or money". true or false?
False. Legally sufficient value in a contract is not limited to goods or money; it can include other forms of consideration as well.
Legally sufficient value refers to the consideration or something of value that is required in a contract to make it valid and enforceable. While goods or money are commonly used as forms of consideration, they are not the only types that can have legally sufficient value. Consideration can also include services, property, promises, or even refraining from doing something. The key requirement is that the consideration provided by each party must have some measurable value.
Legally sufficient value is a fundamental concept in contract law. It ensures that both parties in a contract exchange something of value, which helps establish a mutual obligation and prevents one-sided agreements. While goods and money are frequently used as consideration, they are not the exclusive options.
For example, in a contract between a landlord and a tenant, the tenant's promise to pay rent each month can be considered legally sufficient value. In another scenario, if someone promises not to disclose certain confidential information in exchange for a benefit, the promise of confidentiality can be considered valid consideration.
The principle of legally sufficient value is rooted in the idea that a contract should reflect a fair exchange of goods, services, promises, or any other valuable consideration. This requirement helps ensure that parties enter into contracts with a clear understanding of their obligations and that the agreement is supported by a genuine exchange of value. It also prevents contracts based on mere gifts or gratuitous promises from being legally enforceable.
In summary, while goods and money are commonly used forms of consideration, legally sufficient value in a contract can take various forms. As long as the consideration provided by each party has some measurable value and signifies a mutual exchange, it can meet the requirement for legally sufficient value.
Learn more about legally sufficient value.
brainly.com/question/30187192
#SPJ11
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
When a counselor communicates with a client using e-mail:_____
a. the counselor should never include anything that is confidential because it is unethical to do so.
b. the client's business e-mail address should never be used because employers often read the e-mail messages of their employees.
c. the client should be told to avoid using e-mail to set or change appointment times because it is impossible to tell whether the counselor received the message that was sent.
d. the client should be advised that e-mail messages can always be retrieved and that e-mail systems are not as secure as other means of communication.
e. the counselor should never print out the e-mail messages because the client s confidentiality would be compromised by the existence of paper copies.
Answer:
The answer is E
Explanation:
Whenever you're talking to a client there is always confidentiality, unless you or someone else is in danger they are not allowed to say anything PERIOD. whether it's over phone, email, text, or talking in person they are never allowed to share. <3 hope this helps
Discussion Questions: How does current administration's immigration policy impact
economic, security, and humanitarian policy? How was it treated prior to 9/11? Due to the
current policy, what are the challenges that the United States has regarding securing both
the US/Canada and US/Mexico borders? Do you believe the U.S. policy treats illegal
migrants with dignity? How has the COVID pandemic impacted this policy? (LO1.1 & LO1.2)
1. The current administration's immigration policy has impacted the federal government's economic, security, and humanitarian policy by reinforcing national security while failing to marry the economic and humanitarian disasters and benefits of immigration.
2. Before 9/11, immigration was regarded as a humanitarian way of national openness and was never a security concern.
3. The current immigration policy has mandated the United States to create the Department of Home Security, charged with ensuring safe land borders with Canada and Mexico.
4. Following the creation of the Department of Home Security, the dignity accorded to migrants, whether legal or illegal, has been completely lost on the altar of physical and economic security.
5. The COVID pandemic worsened the U.S. immigration policy because it imposed outright border closures. As a result, the closures brought untold hardships to migrants, who were left stranded at the Canada and Mexico borders with humanitarian catastrophes.
What is immigration?Immigration is the international movement of people who leave their countries of origin to reside in another country or become citizens.
Many reasons for immigration include:
Family reunionViolent conflictsEnvironmental factorsEducational purposesEmployment opportunities.Learn more about the United States' current immigration policy at https://brainly.com/question/20544005
#SPJ1
Fill in the blank with a vocabulary word.
The _______ of flowers smelled good.
bouquet
feathers
flowers
Answer:
The bouquet of flowers smelled good.
Explanation:
A bouquet is a word used to describe a bunch or group of flowers.
Answer:
bouquet
Explanation:
Which makes most sense...
The FEATHERS of flowers smelled good
The FLOWERS of flowers smelled good
The BOUQUET of flowers smelled good
The only one out of those 3 that makes sense, is BOUQUET
:)
Extractive institutions like coal, timber, etc.—that are often economically dominant in rural settings—tend to concentrate power ___________ .
A.Rural communities
B.Among entire local and regional populations
C.in urban communities
D.Among the few
Extractive institutions like coal, timber, etc.—that are often economically dominant in rural settings—tend to concentrate power in urban communities.
What are extractive institutions?This is a term that is used to refer to institutions that extract wealth and natural resources from other areas.
The resources are often gotten from the rural areas and they are used in companies that are in the urban centers.
Read more on extractive institutions here:
https://brainly.com/question/10698634
#SPJ1
Which of the following economic systems leaves production decisions
completely up to the producers?
O A. Command economy
O B. Planned economy
оооо
C. Mixed economy
O D. Free-market economy
\(\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}\)
Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Economics.
A free-market system is an economic system in which the market decides the prices of goods and services through supply (producers) and demand (consumers) with little or no government intervention or control. .
Thus the Answer is D. Free-Market Economy.
Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, the president can ask for a(n) ___________ to prevent a strike in a critical industry.
Selected Answer:
temporary take over by the federal government
Response Feedback:
incorrectcooling off
The Taft-Hartley Act allows the President to appoint a board to investigate union disputes if he deems that a strike would endanger national health or safety.
Taft-Hartley Act's goal was to establish a more balanced relationship between labour and management. The Taft-Hartley Act was intended to defuse the growing momentum of the organised labour movement. According to its terms, the President may issue an executive order requiring the reopening of any union-shuttered workplace, with criminal penalties applied to those who refuse. The act specified that in order to unionise a workplace, a majority of employees must vote in favour of doing so. The Taft-Hartley Act also restricted employers' responsibility when on-site supervisors and workplace managers violate workers' legal rights. This provision provides that if a management official participates in conduct that may be construed as harassment of union members for purposes other than the performance of his or her real work duties, the employer shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability.
Learn more about penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/30029167
#SPJ4
ACCORDING TO THE PREAMBLE WHAT RIGHTS DO “WE THE PEOPLE” HAVE? NAME 5 OF THEM.
Answer:
The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.
Establish Justice is the first of five objectives outlined in the 52-word paragraph that the Framers drafted in six weeks during the hot Philadelphia summer of 1787. They found a way to agree on the following basic principles:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Explanation:
mark me as brainliest thank you
A request for admission can lengthen a trial because the parties have to take the time to prove facts on which they may already agree. True or false?.
Answer:
Explanation:
true
Happy Law Offices has total assets of $880 million. Its total liabilities are $293 million and its revenue is $112 million. Calculate the debt ratio in decimal format to 2 places; for example, 19.5% would be .20).
The debt ratio for Happy Law Offices is approximately 0.33.
The debt ratio is a financial metric that measures the proportion of a company's total assets that are financed by debt. It is a measure of the company's leverage or the extent to which it relies on borrowed funds to finance its operations.
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
Total Assets = $880 million
Total Liabilities = $293 million
Debt Ratio = $293 million / $880 million
Debt Ratio = 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
Learn more about debt ratio at:
brainly.com/question/11249578
#SPJ4
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to take legal action and protect yourself.
The distracted driver of a powerboat struck and seriously injured two water skiers who, at time of the accident, were performing a stunt in which one was on the shoulders of the other. The unrelated skiers, who each suffered damages in excess of $100,000, filed a joint complaint based on negligence in a federal court located in the district in which the accident occurred. One of the skiers was a citizen of the forum state. The driver-defendant and the other skier were citizens of a neighboring state. The forum state has a long-arm statute that permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Upon which of the following grounds can the driver most likely successfully move for dismissal of the claim asserted by the skier who is not a citizen of the forum state?
A Improper joinder
B Lack of subject matter jurisdiction
C Lack of personal jurisdiction
D Lack of venue
The correct response is B. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The federal district court lacks both diversity and additional jurisdiction over the non-forum skier's claim.
This claim meets the $75,000 threshold for amount in issue, but it does not meet the diversity of citizenship standard because both the defendant and the non-forum skier are residents of the same state. The court does not have diversity jurisdiction over this issue as a result. Even though this claim is based on the same set of relevant facts as the forum-claim, skier's the court is unable to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over it because it does not meet the diversity-of-citizenship criterion. A legal entity's legal authority to administer justice is referred to in law as its jurisdiction. In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction. The executive and legislative branches of government have the authority to apply international law, conflict of laws, and other relevant legal theories to allocate resources in the most effective way to suit the needs of society. constitutional law, and other legal frameworks. international scope. In general, international laws and treaties offer commitments that states consent to be obligated to uphold. Such agreements are not usually created or kept up to date. The UN charter outlines three principles for exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction. These three principles are territorial sovereignty, state equality, and non-intervention. This calls into question when many states can establish or enforce jurisdiction.
Learn more about jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
YOUR DECISION - As a defense attorney, your job is to create
reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds about Daniel's intent to lure
Christopher to his death. Besides the facts presented above, other
important details about this case include the following: (1) Jose, the
prosecution's main witness, was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser
charge of voluntary manslaughter in return for his testimony, and (2)
Jose was dating Christopher's sister at the time of the murder. What
argument will you make before the jury to create reasonable doubt?
Answer:
this is for the set up this is the first one I saw
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
The Texas Supreme Court decides the case of Livewire Co. v. Power Corp.
Of nine justices, five believe the judgment should be in Livewire's favor.
Justice Bellamy, one of the five, writes a separate opinion. The four justices
who believe the judgment should be in Power's favor join in a third
separate opinion
Bellamy's opinion is
Answer:
a concurring opinion
Explanation: trust me
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
The end result of rescinding the contract is
Answer:
It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).
Explanation:
The character of a witness is also admissible in court.
O True
False
Character evidence is admissible in a criminal trial IF offered by a defendant as circumstantial evidence. - True
Hope this helps!
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
Which of the following concerns led to the Texas Real Estate License Act prohibiting licensees from practicing law?
A)
Licensees giving counsel regarding the validity of an instrument that addresses real property rights
B)
All of these
C)
Contracts for the sale of a business that do not include a real property interest
D)
Individuals using contracts that are not promulgated by TREC
The concern that led to the Texas Real Estate License Act prohibiting licensees from practicing law is because Licensees are giving counsel regarding the validity of an instrument that addresses real property rights. The Option A is correct.
What is the purpose of Texas real estate license Act?The Texas Real Estate License Act protects consumers by requiring all real estate professionals in the state to adhere to high ethical and competency standards. People who want to buy or sell real estate in Texas should make sure their broker or salesperson is state-licensed.
The Texas Real Estate License Act was passed by the Texas state legislature to protect the public from dishonest brokers and sales agents. TRELA also establishes rules for license holders to follow in order to obtain and then maintain a real estate license.
Read more about real estate license Act
brainly.com/question/30030645
#SPJ1