I need help with this question ASAP please!!!

At Lewisville University, they are looking into how often students
attend football games. Here are the results:
● 45% of students regularly attend football games
● Of those that attend football games regularly, 35% are first-year
students and 64% are upper-class students.
● Of those that do not attend football games, 25% are first-year
students and 34% are upper-class students
What is the approximate probability that a randomly selected person
will be attending the football game given they are an upper-class
student?

Answer: 1,004.8 or 320\(\pi\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\frac{1}{3} \pi 8^{2} 15=1,004.8\)

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the theta is in second quadrant, x will be negative and y positive. cos(theta)=-2/sqrt(29)=B/H, the base is 2 and H=sqrt(29). The perpendicular is 5.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

43 + 24 + 57 + x = 180 degree (being sum of interior angles of a triangle)

124 + x = 180

x = 180 - 124

x = 56 degree

in small triangle

57 + 24 + z = 180 degree (sum of interior angles of a triangle )

81 + z = 180

z = 180 - 81

z = 99 degree

in big triangle

x + 43 + y = 180 degree (sum of interior angles of a triangle )

56 + 43 + y = 180

99 + y =180

y = 180 - 99

y = 81 degree

The value of x= 56°

Hope it helps you...

The exponential function that represents the table is \(y =2\times 2^x\)

An exponential function is any function that has its constant raised to the power of an argument.

An exponential function is represented as:

\(y = ab^x\)

Where:

From the table we have the following ordered pair

(x,y) = {(0,2) (1,8)}

So, we have:

\(y = ab^x\)

\(2 = a \times b^0\)

\(a = 2\)

Also, we have:

\(y = ab^x\)

\(8 = 2 \times b^1\)

\(8 = 2 \times b\)

Divide both sides by 2

\(b =4\)

So, we have:

\(y = ab^x\)

\(y =2\times 2^x\)

Hence, the exponential function is:

\(y =2\times 2^x\)

Read more about exponential functions at:

brainly.com/question/11464095

We can arrange the 2023 squares to cover the unit square, with overlaps allowed.

We can prove that a collection of 2023 closed squares of total area 4 can be arranged to cover a unit square by using the pigeonhole principle. Since the total area of the squares is 4, the average area of each square is 4/2023. Let's take a unit square and divide it into 2023 smaller squares of area (1/2023) each. By the pigeonhole principle, we can assign one of the 2023 squares to each of the smaller squares. Since the average area of each square is 4/2023, each of the assigned squares will overlap with at most 4 other squares. Therefore, we can arrange the 2023 squares to cover the unit square, with overlaps allowed.

Learn more about the pigeonhole principle here: brainly.com/question/30322724

#SPJ4

There were 10 different combinations to the multiple choice questions.

Combination is defined as “An arrangement of objects where the order in which the objects are selected does not matter.” The combination means “Selection of things”, where the order of things has no importance.

It is a way of selecting items from a collection where the order of selection does not matter. Suppose we have a set of three numbers P, Q and R. Then in how many ways we can select two numbers from each set, is defined by combination.

\(C_{n,r} = \frac{n!}{(n-r)! r!}\)

where n = 5

r = 3

\(C_{5,3} = \frac{5!}{(5-3)!3!} \\= \frac{5!}{2!3!}\)

= \(\frac{5(4)(3!)}{2!3!}\)

= 20/2

= 10 ways

Learn more about combinations here: https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ1

To illustrate the budget constraints, let's consider the two proposals for a representative individual and the original budget constraint with no policy.

Proposal 1: Income Guarantee of $3000 per year ($15 per day)

In this proposal, the individual receives an income guarantee of $3000 per year, which is equivalent to $15 per day. We can plot the budget constraint with leisure on the x-axis and income on the y-axis.

The slope of the budget constraint represents the wage rate, which is $5 per hour. Assuming an individual works an average of 200 days per year, the maximum income can be calculated as follows:

Max Income = Wage Rate * Hours per Day * Days per Year

          = $5/hour * 8 hours/day * 200 days/year

          = $8000

Therefore, the budget constraint with the income guarantee of $3000 per year would be a straight line passing through the point (0, $3000) and (160, $5000) since $5000 is the income level when all days are worked (200 days * $25 per day).

Proposal 2: Original Budget Constraint with No Policy

In this proposal, we consider the original budget constraint with no policy. Assuming the wage rate is $5 per hour and the individual works an average of 200 days per year, the maximum income is still $8000. The budget constraint without any policy would also be a straight line passing through the point (0, $0) and (160, $8000).

To illustrate both proposals and the original budget constraint on the same graph, we can plot the budget constraints as straight lines with leisure on the x-axis and income on the y-axis. The budget constraints would intersect at different points representing the different policies.

Note: Without specific information about the leisure-income trade-off or any additional policies, it is difficult to provide precise coordinates for the intersection points or the slopes of the budget constraints. The graph provided is a general representation to illustrate the concepts.

To know more about budget refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31952035#

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think the ratio is 3:2 :)

these rats look so delicate and peaceful

Step-by-step explanation:

just like you could float in the air and dance with rats amazing.

To maximize the likelihood function, we take the derivative with respect to θ and set it equal to zero: d/dθ[L(θ|X1,X2,...,Xn)]=−n/θ+(X1+X2+⋯+Xn)/θ2=0.

The MLE for θ in the exponential distribution is simply the sample mean of the observed data.

The exponential distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes the time between events in a Poisson point process. X1,X2,...,XnX1,X2,...,Xn is a random sample of size n from this distribution, which means that each XiXi is an independent and identically distributed random variable with the same exponential distribution.

The probability density function (pdf) of the exponential distribution is given by f(x:θ)=(1/θ)e−x/θ, where θ is the scale parameter. This means that the probability of observing a value x from the distribution is proportional to e−x/θ, with the constant of proportionality being 1/θ.

To estimate the value of θ based on the observed data, we can use the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). The likelihood function for the sample X1,X2,...,XnX1,X2,...,Xn is given by L(θ|X1,X2,...,Xn)=∏i=1n(1/θ)e−Xi/θ=(1/θ)n e−(X1+X2+⋯+Xn)/θ.

Solving for θ, we get θ=(X1+X2+⋯+Xn)/n, which is the sample mean.

Know more about exponential distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31130457

#SPJ11

The function an = -4 + 5(n - 1) in slope intercept form is an = 5n - 9

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

an = -4 + 5(n - 1)

The slope-intercept form of a linear equation is represented as

an = mn + c

Where the variable m is the slope and the variable c is the y-intercept

So, the first step in solving the question is to open the bracket in an = -4 + 5(n - 1)

This gives

an = -4 + 5n - 5

Add -5 and -9

an = 5n - 9

Hence, the representation of the equation is an = 5n - 9

Read more about linear equation at

https://brainly.com/question/14323743

#SPJ1

Dilation does not preserve congruence, as it changes the size of the figure while keeping the same overall shape.

A transformation that does not preserve congruence is a dilation. A dilation is a transformation that changes the size of a figure while keeping the same overall shape. The formula for dilation is:

D(x,y)=(kx,ky)

Where k is the scale factor. A scale factor of less than 1 will decrease the size, whereas a scale factor greater than 1 will increase the size.

For example, if we have a triangle ABC with vertices A(1,1), B(3,3) and C(4,1), after dilation with a scale factor of 0.5, the vertices of the new triangle A'B'C' will be A'(0.5,0.5), B'(1.5,1.5) and C'(2,0.5).

As can be seen from the example, dilation does not preserve congruence. The triangle A'B'C' is not congruent to triangle ABC, since the length of the sides and the angles have changed.

Dilation does not preserve congruence, as it changes the size of the figure while keeping the same overall shape.

Learn more about congruence here:

https://brainly.com/question/7888063

#SPJ4

The vector equation is: x1 * (5, 7) + x2 * (-1, 9) = (6, )
- The matrix equation is: | 5  -1 | | x1 | = |  6  | and | 7   9 | | x2 | = |      |

To write the given system first as a vector equation and then as a matrix equation, follow these steps:

1. Write the given system of equations:
5x1 - x2 = 6
7x1 + 9x2 =

2. Rewrite the system as a vector equation:
x1 * (5, 7) + x2 * (-1, 9) = (6, )

3. Write the matrix equation:
A * X = B

where A is the matrix of coefficients, X is the matrix of variables, and B is the matrix of constants.

4. Create matrix A using the coefficients of x1 and x2:
A = | 5  -1 |
   | 7   9 |

5. Create matrix X using the variables x1 and x2:
X = | x1 |
   | x2 |

6. Create matrix B using the constants of the system:
B = |  6  |
   |      |

So the matrix equation is:
| 5  -1 | | x1 | = |  6  |
| 7   9 | | x2 | = |      |

To summarize:

- The vector equation is: x1 * (5, 7) + x2 * (-1, 9) = (6, )
- The matrix equation is: | 5  -1 | | x1 | = |  6  | and | 7   9 | | x2 | = |      |

#SPJ11

Answer:

V = π(6^2)(8) = 288π cu. in.

= 904.78 cu. in.

Answer:

42,195

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If it is direct proportionality, then y = kx where k is a constant.  Use the given information to find k:

8 = k(12) ⇒ k = 8/12 = 2/3

y = (2/3) x

For y = 12,

12 = (2/3) x ⇒ x = (3/2)*12 = 18

x = 18 when y = 12

I hope this helps a little bit.

In the given word problem, the rate of change is the change in the cost of the ice cream concerning the change in the number of scoops.

That is, the rate of change is the ratio of the change in the cost of ice cream and the change in the number of scoops. Let's first calculate the initial rate of change or slope of the given deal: When we buy a waffle cone, the cost is $3, and we can buy one scoop of ice cream for $1.50.So, for one scoop of ice cream, the total cost would be 3 + 1.50 = $4.50.

We can represent the cost of one scoop of ice cream with the help of a linear equation: y = mx + b. Here, the slope or the rate of change, m = Change in cost of ice cream/ Change in the number of scoops= 1.5/1= 1.5Therefore, the rate of change of the ice cream with respect to the number of scoops is $1.50/scoop.

To know more about linear equation refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/2030026

#SPJ11

A spurious correlation is a correlation between two variables that appears to be causally linked but is actually due to the influence of a third variable that is not considered. The correct answer is  spurious correlation.

Spurious correlations are correlations that exist between two variables, but they are not actually causally related to one another, despite the fact that they appear to be causally related at first glance. The relationship between two variables may be accounted for by a third variable that was previously overlooked or not considered, causing the original correlation to be explained away. Spurious correlations are commonly found in science and research, and they can lead to misleading results if not properly identified and accounted for. It is critical to account for all potential confounding variables in order to establish causal links between variables and avoid spurious correlations. Therefore, researchers must carefully consider all variables that might influence the relationship between two variables to avoid drawing inaccurate conclusions.

know more about spurious correlation

https://brainly.com/question/29361770

#SPJ11

Answer:

a.    \(T = 17s\)

b.    \(D = 72cm\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Direct Variation

\(Distance(D)\ \alpha\ Time (T)\)

D = 264 cm when T = 11 s

Calculating (a)

First, the constant of variation (k) as to be calculated;

Since, there exist a direct proportion; then,

\(D\ \alpha\ T\)

\(D = kT\)

Make k the subject of formula

\(k = \frac{D}{T}\)

D = 264 cm when T = 11 s; So

\(k = \frac{264}{11}\)

\(k = 24\)

So: Solving for (a)

\(D = 408\)

Substitute 408 for D and 24 for k in \(D = kT\)

\(408 = 24 * T\)

Divide both sides by 24

\(\frac{408}{24} = T\)

\(T = \frac{408}{24}\)

\(T = 17s\)

Hence, time to move a distance of 408cm is 17s

Calculating (b)

\(T = 3\)

Substitute 3 for T and 24 for k in \(D = kT\)

\(D = 24 * 3\)

\(D = 72cm\)

Hence, distance covered in 3 seconds is 72cm

The initial amount, a, in the exponential function g(x) = 14 × 2x is 14, and the growth factor, b, is 2.

This can be determined by looking at the equation and noting that the coefficient of x is 2, which indicates that the base of the exponential is 2. We can also calculate the initial amount and growth factor mathematically.

To calculate the initial amount, a, we can take the equation g(x) = 14 × 2x and set x = 0, yielding g(0) = 14 × 20, which simplifies to 14. To calculate the growth factor, b, we can take the natural log of both sides of the equation to yield ln(g(x)) = ln(14 × 2x).

Simplifying this gives

ln(g(x)) = ln(14) + ln(2x).

We can then divide both sides by x to yield

ln(g(x))/x = ln(14) + ln(2)/x.

We can then take the limit as x approaches 0, which yields

ln(g(0))/0 = ln(14) + ln(2)/0.

This simplifies to

ln(g(0)) = ln(14) + ln(2), which can be rearranged to

ln(2) = ln(g(0)) - ln(14).

Taking the exponential of both sides gives us

2 = e^(ln(g(0)) - ln(14)), which simplifies to

2 = g(0)/14, or b = g(0)/14 = 2.

This shows that the initial amount, a, is 14, and the growth factor, b, is 2.

Learn more about exponential function:

https://brainly.com/question/30241796

#SPJ4

Elimination method is the best method to solve the system of equations below

Two or more expressions with an Equal sign is called as Equation.

The given system of equations

6x + 3y = 21...(1)

2x – 3y = -13...(2)

Add equations (1) and (2)

6x+3y+2x-3y=21-13

8x=8

Divide both sides by 8

x=1

Now plug in x value in equation 1

6+3y=21

Subtract 6 from both sides

3y=15

Divide both sides by 3

y=5

By Elimination method we find the values of x and y.

Hence, Elimination method is the best method to solve the system of equations below

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ2

Answer:

x=7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

6 - 6x = 7x - 9x - 22

combine like terms

6 - 6x = -2x - 22

   +2x       +2x

6 -4x = -22

-6          -6

-4x  =  -28

divide both sides by -4

x = 7

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

(2x-3)(2x+1)

Step-by-step explanation:

4x^2 - 4x - 3

we need two numbers that give 12 when multiplied and 4 when subtracted

the numbers are 6 and 2 because 6*2=12 and 6-4=4.

4x^2 - (6-2)x -3

4x^2 -6x +2x -3

take common

2x(2x -3)+1(2x-3)

take (2x-3) as common

(2x-3)(2x*1 + 1*1)

(2x-3)(2x+1)

The area bounded by the x-axis and the curve y = f(x) = 8x^2 + 6x + 6 on the interval [-3,1] is 73/3 square units. To find the area, the function was integrated using the absolute value of f(x) and split into two intervals.

To find the area bounded by the x-axis and the curve y = f(x) = 8x^2 + 6x + 6 on the interval [-3,1], we need to integrate the absolute value of the function f(x) with respect to x:

A = ∫[-3,1] |f(x)| dx

Substituting f(x) into the integral, we get:

A = ∫[-3,1] |8x^2 + 6x + 6| dx

To evaluate this integral, we need to split the interval into two parts: [-3,0] and [0,1], because the function f(x) changes sign at x = 0.

On the interval [-3,0], the absolute value of the function is:

|8x^2 + 6x + 6| = -(8x^2 + 6x + 6)

∫[-3,0] |8x^2 + 6x + 6| dx = -∫[-3,0] (8x^2 + 6x + 6) dx

= -27

On the interval [0,1], the absolute value of the function is:

|8x^2 + 6x + 6| = 8x^2 + 6x + 6

∫[0,1] |8x^2 + 6x + 6| dx = ∫[0,1] (8x^2 + 6x + 6) dx

= 28/3

Therefore, the total area bounded by the x-axis and the curve y = f(x) on the interval [-3,1] is:

A = ∫[-3,1] |f(x)| dx = ∫[-3,0] |8x^2 + 6x + 6| dx + ∫[0,1] |8x^2 + 6x + 6| dx

= -27 + 28/3

= -73/3

Since the area cannot be negative, we take the absolute value of the result:

|A| = 73/3

Therefore, the total area bounded by the x-axis and the curve y = f(x) on the interval [-3,1] is 73/3 square units.

To know more about  area bounded by the curve, visit:
brainly.com/question/13252576
#SPJ11

Answer:

9.00

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine Bob's expected utility for each option, we calculate the utility for each outcome and weigh them by their respective probabilities.

Option A:

Expected utility = 0.5v(316 - 30) + 0.5v(4 - 0)

= 0.5v(48) + 0.5v(4) = 0.548 + 0.54 = 26.

Option B: Expected utility = v(8) = 8.  

Bob would choose Option A as it has a higher expected utility.

ii. Option A: Expected utility = 0.5v(-16) + 0.5v(-4) = 0.5*(-32) + 0.5*(-8)

= -20.

Option B: Expected utility = v(-12) = -24. Bob would choose Option B as it has a higher expected utility.

iii. Option A: Expected utility = 0.5v(8) + 0.5v(-4) = 0.58 + 0.5(-8) = 0. Option B: Expected utility = v(1) = 1.  Bob would choose Option B as it has a higher expected utility.

 (b) If Bob buys the hammer for $2, his utility would be v(-2) = -4. If he does not buy the hammer, his utility would be v(0) = 0. Bob would prefer not to buy the hammer since the utility is higher at 0.

(c) If Bob sells the hammer for $2, his utility would be v(2) = 2. If he does not sell the hammer, his utility would be v(0) = 0. Bob would prefer to sell the hammer since the utility is higher at 2. (d) Bob's buying price is not the same as his selling price.

This concept is known as loss aversion, where individuals tend to value losses more than equivalent gains. One study that demonstrates a similar concept is the "Prospect Theory" by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, which shows how people's decision-making is influenced by the potential for gains and losses and how they weigh them differently.

The study revealed that individuals are generally more averse to losses and are willing to take greater risks to avoid losses compared to the risks they are willing to take for potential gains of equal value.

To learn more about probabilities click here: brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11