i need help with geometry rotations

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

here you go

step 1

2 (t - 4) + 1  equation

step 2

2 (t - 4) + 1  simplify

2t+-8+1

step 3

2t+−8+1  combine terms

answer

2t-7

can you give brainliest if you dont mind

The given statement is False. A test statistic based on point estimation is not used to construct the decision rule which defines the rejection region.

In hypothesis testing, a test statistic is calculated using sample data and a specific hypothesis to assess the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. The decision rule, which determines whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, is based on the test statistic's distribution under the null hypothesis, rather than the point estimate itself.

The construction of the decision rule involves selecting a significance level (alpha), which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The rejection region is determined based on the chosen significance level and the distribution of the test statistic. If the calculated test statistic falls within the rejection region, the null hypothesis is rejected; otherwise, it is not rejected.

Point estimation, on the other hand, is used to estimate an unknown parameter of interest, such as the population mean or proportion, based on sample data. It involves calculating a single value (point estimate) that represents the best guess for the parameter value. The point estimate is not directly involved in constructing the decision rule or defining the rejection region in hypothesis testing.

Learn more about test statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/31746962

#SPJ11

False. A test statistic based on point estimation is not used to construct the decision rule that defines the rejection region.

The process of hypothesis testing involves constructing a decision rule to determine whether to accept or reject a null hypothesis based on sample data. The decision rule is typically defined using a critical region or rejection region, which is a range of values for the test statistic.

Point estimation, on the other hand, is a method used to estimate an unknown population parameter based on sample data. It involves calculating a single value (point estimate) that serves as an estimate of the population parameter.

While point estimation and hypothesis testing are both important concepts in statistics, they serve different purposes. Point estimation is used to estimate population parameters, whereas hypothesis testing involves making decisions based on sample data.

The decision rule for hypothesis testing is typically constructed based on the significance level (alpha) and the distribution of the test statistic, such as the t-distribution or the standard normal distribution. The test statistic is calculated using sample data and compared to critical values or calculated p-values to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, the statement that a test statistic based on point estimation is used to construct the decision rule defining the rejection region is false.

Learn more about  statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/32201536

#SPJ11

To solve the given linear programming (LP) problem using the graphical LP approach, we will plot the feasible region, identify the corner points, and determine the optimal solution.

Here are the steps:

Step 1: Plot the constraints:

- Plot the line 5x + y = 32, which represents the constraint 5x + y ≤ 32. To do this, find two points that lie on this line by assigning values to x and solving for y. For example, when x = 0, y = 32, and when x = 6, y = 2. Connect these points to draw the line.

- Plot the line x + 3y = 12, representing the constraint x + 3y ≥ 12. Again, find two points on this line and connect them. For instance, when x = 0, y = 4, and when x = 12, y = 0.

- Draw the lines representing x = 20 and y = 20 as vertical and horizontal lines passing through x = 20 and y = 20, respectively.

Step 2: Identify the feasible region:

- Shade the area that satisfies all the constraints. The feasible region is the intersection of the shaded regions.

Step 3: Identify the corner points:

- Find the coordinates of the corner points of the feasible region. These points are the intersections of the lines representing the constraints.

Step 4: Evaluate the objective function:

- Calculate the objective function Z = 3x + 12y for each corner point.

Step 5: Determine the optimal solution:

- Identify the corner point that gives the minimum value of the objective function Z. This point corresponds to the optimal solution of the LP problem.

Once you have completed these steps, you will have the complete solution to the LP problem using the graphical LP approach.

To know  more about constraints visit:

brainly.com/question/32387329

#SPJ11

Answer: a=4b/5

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for a, we want to use algebraic properties to isolate a.

3a+2b=6b-2a               [add both sides by 2a]

5a+2b=6b                     [subtract both sides by 2b]

5a=4b                           [divide both sides by 5]

a=4b/5

Now, we have found that a=4b/5.

the weights that separate the top 9%of the machine components is 6.33 ounces and the bottom 9% of the machine components is 6.27 ounces.

We know that the weights of the machine components are normally distributed with a mean of 6.3 ounces and a standard deviation of 0.03 ounces.

Let X be the weight of a machine component.

To find the weights that separate the top 9% and the bottom 9%, we need to find the z-scores corresponding to these percentiles and then use them to find the corresponding weights.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find that the z-score corresponding to the top 9% is approximately 1.34, and the z-score corresponding to the bottom 9% is approximately -1.34.

Using the formula for converting a value to a z-score:

z = (X - μ) / σ

For the top 9% weight, we have:

1.34 = (X - 6.3) / 0.03

Solving for X, we get:

X = 6.33 ounces

For the bottom 9% weight, we have:

-1.34 = (X - 6.3) / 0.03

Solving for X, we get:

X = 6.27 ounces

Therefore, the weights that separate the top 9% and the bottom 9% of the machine components are 6.33 ounces and 6.27 ounces, respectively. Any components with weights outside of this range may be considered for rejection.

To learn more about standard deviation click here

brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ4

Answer:

(x+7)(x+2) = 66

x^2+9x+14=66

x^2 + 9x -52 = 0

(x+13)(x-4) = 0

x = 4 bc the other root, -13, can't be used (it would make the dimensions negative values)

Answer:

The answer is "Do her friends have accounts at the same bank?"

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question, the above given-choice is correct because the account on the same bank has certainly, but when a retirement fund in a company is concerned, you could only have a savings account on their behalf, and the mutual funds must then be distributed, and these several savings accounts can be opened is by tracking the amount they need to save for every savings target.

The equivalent value of the given expression is -21.4

Decimals are values that include decimal points. Given the expression below

-8.2 - 5−8.2

Collect like terms

-8.2 −8.2 - 5

Convert to fractions

-82/10- 82/10 -  5

-164/10 - 5

-16.4 - 5

Take the sum

-21.4

Hence the equivalent value of the given expression is -21.4

Learn more on expression here: https://brainly.com/question/22048677

#SPJ1

Answer:

10/3

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that helps

Answer

3 hot dogs

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X = number of hotdogs

3.00x + 2(1.50)= 12.00

3.00x + 3.00= 12.00

3.00x + 3.00 - 3.00 = 12.00 - 3.00

3.00x = 9.00

X = 3

3(3.00) + 2(1.50) = 12.00

9 + 3 = 12

The measurement deviates from the mean by more than 100 standard deviations.

It's a way to gauge how widely apart each data point is from the mean. The standard deviation formula comes in two different forms: Standard deviation for the population When you can measure the entire population or the entire collection of data, you use the population version of the formula. Experts in statistics have determined that measurements that fall within a 2 SD range of the true value are more accurate than those that do not..

based on the facts provided;

the average population, =100

The standard deviation for the population

σ=10

Z score:

Z=X−μσ

X:The measurement.

The number of standard deviations the measurement is from the mean:

We are not given the measurement. So, assuming the measurement is equal to 139.

When

X=139

Z=139−100/10

=3.9

It implies that the measurement of

139 is 3.9

standard deviation above the mean of 100;

To know more about standard deviation visit;

https://brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ9

For Question 22:
To calculate the Page Rank of node B after 2 iterations, we need to use the formula:
PR(x) = (1-d) + d(Σ PR(y)/O(y))
where PR(y) is the Page Rank of node y and O(y) is the number of outgoing links from node y.

After the first iteration, the Page Rank of each node is:
PR(A) = 0.16, PR(B) = 0.29, PR(C) = 0.26, PR(D) = 0.29

So, for node B:
PR(B) = (1-0.9) + 0.9((PR(A)/1) + (PR(C)/2) + (PR(D)/1))
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.16/1 + 0.26/2 + 0.29/1)
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.16 + 0.13 + 0.29)
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.58)
= 0.52

After the second iteration, we need to use the updated Page Rank values to calculate the new values. So, after the first iteration, the Page Rank of each node is:
PR(A) = 0.11, PR(B) = 0.52, PR(C) = 0.28, PR(D) = 0.29

So, for node B:
PR(B) = (1-0.9) + 0.9((PR(A)/1) + (PR(C)/2) + (PR(D)/1))
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.11/1 + 0.28/2 + 0.29/1)
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.11 + 0.14 + 0.29)
= 0.1 + 0.9(0.54)
= 0.55

Therefore, the Page Rank of node B after 2 iterations is 0.55.

For Question 23:
To calculate the authoritativeness and hubness scores for node A, we need to use the formulas:
a(x) = Σh(y) and h(x) = Σa(y)
where h(y) is the hubness score of node y and a(y) is the authoritativeness score of node y.

In the very beginning, all nodes have an equal score of 1. So, for node A:
a(A) = h(A) = 1

Therefore, the authoritativeness and hubness scores for node A in the very beginning are both 1.

For Question 24:
To calculate the hubness score of node D after 2 iterations, we need to use the formula:
h(x) = Σa(y)*z(y,x)
where a(y) is the authoritativeness score of node y and z(y,x) is 1 if there is a link from node y to node x, otherwise it is 0.

After the first iteration, the authoritativeness scores are:
a(A) = 0.11, a(B) = 0.52, a(C) = 0.28, a(D) = 0.09

And the hubness scores are:
h(A) = 0.11, h(B) = 0.28, h(C) = 0.52, h(D) = 0.09

So, for node D:
h(D) = (a(A)*z(A,D)) + (a(B)*z(B,D)) + (a(C)*z(C,D)) + (a(D)*z(D,D))
= (0.11*0) + (0.52*1) + (0.28*0) + (0.09*1)
= 0.61

After the second iteration, the updated authoritativeness scores are:
a(A) = 0.07, a(B) = 0.38, a(C) = 0.27, a(D) = 0.28

And the updated hubness scores are:
h(A) = 0.07, h(B) = 0.29, h(C) = 0.45, h(D) = 0.19

So, for node D:
h(D) = (a(A)*z(A,D)) + (a(B)*z(B,D)) + (a(C)*z(C,D)) + (a(D)*z(D,D))
= (0.07*0) + (0.38*1) + (0.27*0) + (0.28*1)
= 0.66

Therefore, the hubness score of node D after 2 iterations is 0.66.
Question 22:
For the Page Rank of node B after 2 iterations, we use the formula: PR(x) = (1-d) + d * Σ(PR(y)/O(y)), where d=0.9, and O(y) is the number of outgoing links from y.

Without knowing the specific network structure and initial Page Rank values, I cannot provide the exact Page Rank for node B after 2 iterations.

Question 23:
In the beginning, the authoritativeness (a) and hubness (h) scores for node A are initialized. Generally, they are initialized as 1 for each node.

So, for node A:
a(A) = 1
h(A) = 1

Question 24:
For the hubness score of node D after 2 iterations, we need to update the initial hubness score twice using the formula: h(x) = Σ(a(y)), where x has a link to y.

Similar to Question 22, without knowing the specific network structure and initial authoritativeness values, I cannot provide the exact hubness score for node D after 2 iterations.

Learn more about Graph Theory here: brainly.com/question/30340330

#SPJ11

The perimeter of the triangle is 170 inches.

To solve for the perimeter, we first need to find the length of the perpendicular height. We can do this using the sine function:

sin(35°) = 46/x

x = 46/sin(35°) = 65 inches

Now that we know the length of the perpendicular height, we can find the length of the base of the triangle using the cosine function:

cos(35°) = 65/x

x = 65/cos(35°) = 75 inches

The perimeter of the triangle is the sum of the lengths of the three sides, so the perimeter is:

P = 65 + 75 + 30

= 170 inches

Learn more about perimeter on

https://brainly.com/question/19819849

#SPJ1

Answer: it takes 4 seconds

Step-by-step explanation: solve values of t when h(t) = 0.

-3t² + 12t= 0 when t(-3t+12)= 0, t= 0 (start) or t=4

Answer:

\(3 \times \frac{1}{3 } + \frac{1}{2} \times - 12( \frac{1}{3} ) = \frac{1}{3} \)

Answer:

I think it goes in this order

<LNO<NLM <OLN

Answer:

<LNO<NLM <OLN

Step-by-step explanation:

The system modeled by the given transfer function H(s) = (2\(s^2\) + 1) / (\(s^3\) + 5\(s^2\) + 6) is stable.

To analyze the stability of the system modeled by the given third-order transfer function H(s) = (2\(s^2\) + 1) / (\(s^3\) + 5\(s^2\) + 6), we need to examine the poles of the transfer function.

The stability of a system is determined by the location of its poles in the complex plane. If all the poles have negative real parts, the system is stable. If any pole has a positive real part, the system is unstable. If all the poles have zero real parts (lie on the imaginary axis), the system is marginally stable.

Let's find the poles of the transfer function by solving the denominator equation:

\(s^3\) + 5\(s^2\) + 6 = 0

Factoring the equation, we have:

(s + 1)(\(s^2\) + 4s + 6) = 0

Setting each factor equal to zero, we get:

s + 1 = 0 or \(s^2\) + 4s + 6 = 0

From s + 1 = 0, we find s = -1.

To solve \(s^2\) + 4s + 6 = 0, we can apply the quadratic formula:

s = (-b ± √(\(b^2\) - 4ac)) / (2a)

In this case, a = 1, b = 4, and c = 6. Substituting these values into the quadratic formula, we get:

s = (-4 ± √(\(4^2\) - 4(1)(6))) / (2(1))

s = (-4 ± √(16 - 24)) / 2

s = (-4 ± √(-8)) / 2

Since the discriminant (√(-8)) is negative, the quadratic equation has complex roots. Simplifying further, we have:

s = (-4 ± 2√2i) / 2

s = -2 ± √2i

The poles of the transfer function are -1, -2 + √2i, and -2 - √2i.

Analyzing the real parts of the poles, we find that all the poles have negative real parts. Therefore, the system modeled by the given transfer function H(s) = (2\(s^2\) + 1) / (\(s^3\) + 5\(s^2\) + 6) is stable.

To learn more about transfer function here:

https://brainly.com/question/33353298

#SPJ4

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

so you have to use the equation

y2 - y1 / x2 - x1

to find the slope

now all you have to do is substitute

-10 - 5 / 9 - 14

-15/ -5

3

Answer:

\(m=3\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\mathrm{Slope\:between\:two\:points}:\quad \mathrm{Slope}=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\)

\(\left(x_1,\:y_1\right)=\left(9,\:-10\right),\:\left(x_2,\:y_2\right)=\left(14,\:5\right)\)

\(m=\frac{5-\left(-10\right)}{14-9}\)

\(\mathrm{Refine}\)

\(m=3\)

Answer:

Now, check another value for the variable.

When w = 2, the first expression is  

✔ 11

.

When w = 2, the second expression is  

✔ 11

.

Therefore, the expressions are  

✔ equivalent

.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1. 11

2. 11

3. Equivalent

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think k = 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 60 = 5(x)

Step-by-step explanation:

60 = 5(x)

60/5 = 12

60 is 5 times as great as 12

The estimated change in revenue when production is changed from 177 to 175 units is approximately -211 units.

To estimate the change in revenue when production is changed from 177 to 175 units, we can use differentials. The differential of a function can be expressed as:

dR = R'(x)× dx

where dR represents the change in revenue, R'(x) is the derivative of the revenue function, and dx represents the change in production.

First, let's calculate the derivative of the revenue function, R(x):

R(x) = 287 + 46x + 0.17x²

Taking the derivative with respect to x:

R'(x) = 46 + 0.34x

Now we can use the differentials formula:

dR = R'(x) × dx

Since we want to estimate the change in revenue when production changes from 177 to 175 units, we have:

dx = 175 - 177 = -2

Substituting the values into the formula:

dR = (46 + 0.34x) ×(-2)

Now we can calculate the estimated change in revenue:

dR = (46 + 0.34x) × (-2)

   = (46 + 0.34 × 175) ×(-2)

   ≈ (46 + 59.5) × (-2)

   ≈ 105.5× (-2)

   ≈ -211

Therefore, the estimated change in revenue when production is changed from 177 to 175 units is approximately -211 units.

Learn more about revenue function here:

https://brainly.com/question/17515069

#SPJ11

Answer:28x+8

Step-by-step explanation:

2(5x+4)+2(4x+3)+10x-6

=10x+8+8x+6+10x-6

=28x+8

Answer:

Laney gets \(1 \frac{3}{15}\) pounds of fudge.

Step-by-step explanation:

2 3/5 x 1/3

Answer:

y=4/5x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx+b

m = slope = 4/5

b = y-intercept= 1

y=4/5x+1

Answer:

She saved 25%

Step-by-step explanation

(100 * 6) /24 = 25

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

4 [x-3] + 2    = y    is not discontinuous anywhere

However    4 / [x-3]  + 2   DOES have a discontinuity at x = 3 because this would cause the denominator to be zero <===NOT allowed !!

To develop the Branch and Bound (B&B) tree for the given problem, follow these steps:

1. Start with the initial B&B tree, where the root node represents the original problem.

2. Choose \($x_1$\) as the branching variable at node 0. Add two child nodes: one for

\($x_1 \leq \lfloor x_1 \rfloor$ \\(floor of $x_1$) and one for $x_1 \geq \lceil x_1 \rceil$ (ceiling of $x_1$).\)

3. At each node, perform the following steps:

  - Solve the relaxed linear programming (LP) problem for the node, ignoring the integer constraints.

  - If the LP solution is infeasible or the objective value is lower than the current best solution, prune the node and its subtree.

  - If the LP solution is integer, update the current best solution if the objective value is higher.

  - If the LP solution is non-integer, choose the fractional variable with the largest absolute difference from its rounded value as the branching variable.

4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for each unpruned node until all nodes have been processed.

5. The node with the highest objective value among the integer feasible solutions is the optimal solution.

6. Optionally, backtrace through the tree to retrieve the optimal solution variables.

Note: The specific LP problem and its constraints are missing from the given question, so adapt the steps accordingly.

To know more about Probability visit-

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11