i dont get how to do these questions
-25x=-150

(i) The pdf of random variable X is:

\(fx(x) = {2bx e^{(-bx^2)}\), x > 0

0, x < 0

(ii) The pdf of Y is:

\(fy(y) = b\sqrt y / e^{(by)} , y > 0\)

0, y ≤ 0

(i) To find the probability density function (pdf) of X, we need to take the derivative of the cumulative distribution function (cdf) with respect to x.

For x > 0, we have:

\(Fx(x) = 1 - e^{(-bx^2)}\)

Differentiating both sides with respect to x gives:

fx(x) = d/dx Fx(x) = \(d/dx [1 - e^{(-bx^2)}] = 2bx e^{(-bx^2)}\)

For x < 0, we have:

Fx(x) = 0

Differentiating both sides with respect to x gives:

fx(x) = d/dx Fx(x) = d/dx [0] = 0

Therefore, the pdf of X is:

\(fx(x) = {2bx e^{(-bx^2)}\), x > 0

{0, x < 0

(ii) To find the pdf of \(Y = X^2\), we can use the transformation method. The transformation function is \(g(x) = x^2\).

We have:

Fy(y) = P(Y ≤ y) = P(\(X^2\) ≤ y) = P(-√y ≤ X ≤ √y) = Fx(√y) - Fx(-√y)

Differentiating both sides with respect to y gives:

fy(y) = d/dy Fy(y) = d/dy [Fx(√y) - Fx(-√y)]

= (1/2y) fx(√y) - (-1/2y) fx(-√y)

\(= (1/2y) 2b\sqrt y e^{(-by)}\)

= \(b\sqrt y / e^{(by)}\)

Therefore, the pdf of Y is:

\(fy(y) = b\sqrt y / e^{(by)} , y > 0\)

0, y ≤ 0

Learn more about probability density function

brainly.com/question/29383481

#SPJ11

The seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To calculate the seasonal total prior to the recent storm, we need to subtract the rainfall from the recent storm (50 inches) from the updated seasonal total (26.42 inches).

Let's assume that the seasonal total prior to the recent storm is represented by "x" inches.

So, we can set up the equation:

x - 50 = 26.42

To solve for x, we can add 50 to both sides of the equation:

x - 50 + 50 = 26.42 + 50

This simplifies to:

x = 76.42

Therefore, the seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To know more about equation click-
http://brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ11

Hyperkalemia is a medical condition that refers to an elevated level of potassium in the blood.

This condition can be caused by several factors, including kidney disease, certain medications, and hormone imbalances. Symptoms of hyperkalemia can range from mild to severe, depending on the level of potassium in the blood.

In a 60-year-old female diagnosed with hyperkalemia, the most likely symptom that would be observed is muscle weakness. This is because high levels of potassium can interfere with the normal functioning of muscles, leading to weakness, fatigue, and even paralysis in severe cases.

Other symptoms that may be observed in hyperkalemia include nausea, vomiting, irregular heartbeat, and numbness or tingling in the extremities. Treatment of hyperkalemia typically involves addressing the underlying cause of the condition, as well as managing symptoms through medication and lifestyle changes.

To learn more about factors click here

brainly.com/question/29128446

#SPJ11

1) The statement of Lin is correct.

2) (a) When scale factor, k = 9, area of the new triangle = 8100 square inches

(b) When k = 3/4, area of the new triangle = 56.25 square inches.

Given that,

A triangle has area 100 square inches.

It's dilated by a factor of k = 0.25.

When the triangle is dilated by a scale factor of k, then, each of the base and height is dilated by the scale factor of k.

So new area of the triangle after the dilation with the original triangle having base = b and height = h is,

Area of new triangle = 1/2 (kb)(kh) = k² (1/2 bh) = k² × Area of original triangle

Here original area = 100 square inches.

k = 0.25

New area = (0.25)² 100 = 6.25 square inches

So the correct statement is that of Lin.

Mai may found the new area by just multiplying the scale factor with 100, instead of taking the square of the scale factor. That is why she got 25 square inches as the new area.

2) (a) When k = 9,

Area of the new triangle = 9² (100) = 8100 square inches

(b) When k = 3/4

Area of the new triangle = (3/4)² (100) = 56.25 square inches

Hence the areas are found.

Learn more about Scale Factor here :

https://brainly.com/question/29464385

#SPJ1

The real root of the given equation is x = 0.00410 (approximate).

Solve one real root of e* - 2x - 5 = 0 with Xo = -2 using the Fixed-Point Iteration хо Method until absolute error < 0.00001. A real root is any value that makes the equation true. It is given that `e* - 2x - 5 = 0`.

To solve one real root of the given equation using the Fixed-Point Iteration хо Method, we rearrange the equation into the form of x = g(x) and select an initial value of x0 and compute successive values using the formula `xi = g(xi-1)` until absolute error < 0.00001. Here, we rearrange the given equation as: `x = g(x) = (e* - 5)/2`where x is the root of the equation.

Now, we use the Fixed-Point Iteration хо Method by selecting X0 = -2, and then iteratively calculating successive values of xi using the formula,`xi = g(xi-1) = (e* - 5)/2`, until absolute error < 0.00001. Absolute error is the absolute value of the difference between the actual value and the approximate value.We know that e* = 7.38906. So, `x = (e* - 5)/2 = (7.38906 - 5)/2 = 1.19453`After the first iteration, `x1 = g(x0) = (e* - 5)/2 = (7.38906 - 5)/2 = 1.19453` The absolute error is `|x1 - x0| = |1.19453 - (-2)| = 3.19453`Since the absolute error > 0.00001, we continue the iteration. After the second iteration, `x2 = g(x1) = (e* - 5)/2 = (7.38906 - 5)/2 = 1.19453` The absolute error is `|x2 - x1| = |1.19453 - 1.19453| = 0`Since the absolute error < 0.00001, we stop the iteration.

Therefore, the one real root of the given equation is x = 1.19453.2.  Compute for a real root of sin √x - x = O using three iterations of Fixed-Point Iteration Method with xo = 0.50 until absolute error < 0.00001.To find the real root of the given equation using the Fixed-Point Iteration Method, we first need to transform the equation to the form `x = g(x)`.We can write the equation as `sin √x = x` or `√x = sin^(-1)x`.

Now, we take the function g(x) as `g(x) = sin^(-1)x^2`.Starting with x0 = 0.50, we can compute successive approximations as follows: Iteration 1:x1 = g(x0) = sin^(-1)x0^2 = sin^(-1)0.25 = 0.25307Error: |x1 - x0| = |0.25307 - 0.50| = 0.24693Iteration 2:x2 = g(x1) = sin^(-1)x1^2 = sin^(-1)0.06401 = 0.06411Error: |x2 - x1| = |0.06411 - 0.25307| = 0.18896Iteration 3:x3 = g(x2) = sin^(-1)x2^2 = sin^(-1)0.00410 = 0.00410Error: |x3 - x2| = |0.00410 - 0.06411| = 0.06001Since the absolute error < 0.00001, we stop the iteration.

To know more about real root visit :

https://brainly.com/question/21664715

#SPJ11

The method converges after 10 iterations, and the final value of x is 1.368804111.

1. The equation given is e*-2x-5 = 0To Solve one real root of e* - 2x - 5 = 0 with Xo = -2 using the Fixed-Point Iteration хо Method until absolute error < 0.00001.

Finding the value of x with Xo = -2: Given, the equation is e*-2x-5 = 0By rearranging the above equation, we getx = (1/2)*e^-x + (5/2)We can write this equation in the fixed-point form asX = g(x)Where g(x) = (1/2)*e^-x + (5/2)Using Xo = -2, calculate g(Xo).

g(Xo) = (1/2)*e^--2 + (5/2) = -0.01831563889Use this result as the new approximation X1 = g(Xo).Now, we can repeat this process until the absolute error is less than 0.00001.The table below shows the calculation for the fixed-point iteration method. The method converges after 10 iterations, and the final value of x is 1.368804111.
2. The given equation is sin √x - x = 0 To Compute for a real root of sin √x - x = O using three iterations of the Fixed-Point Iteration Method with xo = 0.50 until absolute error < 0.00001.Using the given equation, we getx = sin(√x)Using fixed-point iteration method, we can write the above equation as X = g(x)Where g(x) = sin(√x)Using Xo = 0.5, calculate g(Xo).g(Xo) = sin(√0.5) = 0.9092974

Use this result as the new approximation X1 = g(Xo). Again calculate g(X1).g(X1) = sin(√0.9092974) = 0.7902430 Similarly, calculate g(X2).g(X2) = sin(√0.7902430) = 0.8315759By repeating this process until the absolute error is less than 0.00001, we obtain the following values of X.The table below shows the calculation for the fixed-point iteration method. The method converges after 9 iterations, and the final value of x is 0.64171438.

To know more about converges visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29258536

#SPJ11

U.S. v. Spearin (1918) is a significant case that established an important principle in construction contracts, known as the Spearin doctrine. The case involved a dispute between the United States government and a contractor over the construction of a dry dock. The

The contractor argued that the government's defective specifications caused delays and additional costs. The court ruled in favor of the contractor, stating that the government impliedly warranted the adequacy of the specifications and was responsible for any defects. This decision established that when a contractor relies on plans and specifications provided by the owner, the owner impliedly warrants the adequacy and accuracy of those plans. The Spearin doctrine has since been widely recognized and applied in construction law to protect contractors from the risks associated with defective or inadequate specifications provided by the owner.
The case of U.S. v. Spearin (1918) dealt with a dispute between a contractor and the United States government over the construction of a dry dock. The central issue was whether the government could be held responsible for delays and additional costs caused by defective specifications provided to the contractor. The court's ruling established the Spearin doctrine, which states that when a contractor relies on plans and specifications provided by the owner, the owner impliedly warrants their adequacy and accuracy. In other words, if the contractor follows the provided plans and specifications and encounters difficulties or incurs extra expenses due to their deficiencies, the owner is held liable. This doctrine is based on the principle that the owner is in the best position to ensure the accuracy and sufficiency of the plans, and it protects contractors from unforeseen risks associated with defective specifications. The Spearin doctrine has become a fundamental principle in construction law, providing contractors with legal recourse in cases where they suffer harm due to inadequate or inaccurate plans and specifications provided by the owner.

learn more about construction here

https://brainly.com/question/33182774



#SPJ11

Parallel slope = 2

This is because the original line has slope 2. Parallel lines have equal slopes.

--------------------------

Perpendicular slope = -1/2

The original slope 2 or 2/1 turns into -1/2 after flipping the fraction and the sign. Note the original slope and perpendicular slope multiply to -1. This is true for any pair of perpendicular lines where neither line is vertical.

Answer:

the slope of  the parallel line is 2x

the slope of line perpendicular is -1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

f(1) = - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Locate x = 1 on the x - axis, then go vertically down to (1, - 3 ) , then

f(1) = - 3

The lion is the second fastest land animal in all of Africa, reaching a top speed of 81 km/h (50.3 mph). The lion can consider itself faster than other animals, only being outpaced by the cheetah, which can achieve an astounding 120 km/h (74 mph).

To learn more about ratio, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ1

The given linear regression model wages = β0~ + β1~ Education + u~ aims to explain the relationship between wages and education level.

To determine if this model accurately measures the returns to education, we need to consider a few factors.
1. Assumptions: Linear regression models rely on several assumptions, such as linearity, independence, homoscedasticity, and normality of residuals. Violation of these assumptions can affect the accuracy of the model's estimates. It is important to check if these assumptions hold in the context of the wages and education relationship.

2. Significance of β1: The coefficient β1 represents the estimated effect of education on wages. A statistically significant and positive β1 indicates that an increase in education level is associated with higher wages. However, if β1 is not statistically significant, it suggests that education may not have a significant impact on wages.

3. Magnitude of β1: Even if β1 is statistically significant, the magnitude of the coefficient is essential in measuring the returns to education accurately. A larger β1 implies a higher increase in wages for each additional unit of education. Conversely, a smaller β1 suggests a lower return to education.

4. Control Variables: The model may need to consider other factors that could influence wages, such as experience, gender, or industry. By including relevant control variables, the model can better isolate the effect of education on wages and provide a more accurate measure of returns.

5. Data Quality: The accuracy of the model's estimates relies on the quality and representativeness of the data used. The dataset should encompass a wide range of education levels, wages, and relevant variables to obtain robust and reliable estimates.

To know more about linear regression refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ11

The angle between v and w is 1.9 radians. So,

A) \(\(v \cdot w \approx 1.035\)\).

B) \(\(\lVert 4v + 4w \rVert = 12\)\).

C) \(\(\lVert 1v - 4w \rVert = 2\).\)

(a) To calculate the dot product \(\(v \cdot w\)\) , we can use the formula:

\(\[v \cdot w = \lVert v \rVert \lVert w \rVert \cos(\theta)\]\)

where \(\(\lVert v \rVert\) and \(\lVert w \rVert\)\) are the magnitudes of vectors v and w respectively, and \(\(\theta\)\) is the angle between them.

Given that \(\(\lVert v \rVert = 2\), \(\lVert w \rVert = 1\)\), and \(\(\theta = 1.9\)\) radians, we can substitute these values into the formula:

\(\[v \cdot w = 2 \cdot 1 \cdot \cos(1.9)\]\)

Using a calculator to find the cosine value, we can evaluate the expression:

\(\[v \cdot w \approx 2 \cdot 1 \cdot \cos(1.9) \approx 1.035\]\)

Therefore, \(\(v \cdot w \approx 1.035\).\)

(b) To calculate the magnitude of the vector (4v + 4w), we can use the formula:

\(\[\lVert 4v + 4w \rVert = 4 \lVert v \rVert + 4 \lVert w \rVert\]\)

Given that \(\(\lVert v \rVert = 2\)\) and \(\(\lVert w \rVert = 1\)\) , we can substitute these values into the formula:

\(\[\lVert 4v + 4w \rVert = 4 \cdot 2 + 4 \cdot 1 = 8 + 4 = 12\]\)

Therefore, \(\(\lVert 4v + 4w \rVert = 12\).\)

(c) To calculate the magnitude of the vector (1v - 4w), we can use the formula:

\(\[\lVert 1v - 4w \rVert = 1 \lVert v \rVert + (-4) \lVert w \rVert\]\)

Given that \(\(\lVert w \rVert = 1\)\) , we can substitute these values into the formula:

\(\[\lVert 1v - 4w \rVert = 1 \cdot 2 + (-4) \cdot 1 = 2 - 4 = -2\]\)

Therefore, \(\(\lVert 1v - 4w \rVert = 2\).\)

To know more about angle refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13954458

#SPJ11

The area of the polygon is solved to be  1044 squared cm

The area of the composite polygon is solved by dividing the object into two sections. Then adding up the areas

Section 1 has dimensions:

length * width = 46 * 14 = 644

section 2 has dimensions:

length = 46 - 21 = 25

width = 30 - 14 = 16

Area = 25 * 16 = 400

Area of the composite figure

section 1  + section 2

= 644 + 400

= 1044 squared cm

Learn more about area at

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ1

1. The budget constraint in this period is given by 2H + Z = 10.

2. The optimal allocation of health (H) and the home good (Z₁) is H = (5/3)w and Z₁ = (5/3)w, respectively.

3. Incorporating health depreciation at a rate of 0.75, the new optimal choice is H = 6.25 and Z₁ = (5/3)w.

4. When the individual becomes twice as efficient at producing health with Me, the new optimal choices are H = 6.25 + 2Me and Z₁ = (5/3)w.

5. When the wage rises to $3 per unit time, the optimal choices of H₂ and Z remain the same as in the previous case (H = 6.25 + 2Me and Z₁ = (5/3)w) as there is no impact on the relative prices and production functions.

The budget constraint in this period can be defined as 2H + Z = 5w. Since the individual works a fixed amount of time, TW = 5, and the wage is $2 per unit of time, the total income available for the individual is 5w.

To find the optimal allocation of health (H) and the home good (Z), we need to calculate the first-order conditions of the utility function and set them equal to each other.

∂U/∂H = Z₁ = λ

∂U/∂Z = H = λ

Setting these equal to each other, we get:

Z₁ = H

Combining this with the budget constraint:

2H + Z = 5w

Substituting Z₁ = H into the budget constraint, we have:

2H + H = 5w

3H = 5w

H = (5/3)w

Substituting H back into Z₁ = H, we get:

Z₁ = (5/3)w

Therefore, the optimal level of health (H) is (5/3) times the wage (w), and the optimal level of the home good (Z₁) is also (5/3) times the wage (w).

To incorporate health depreciation at a rate of y = 0.75, we need to modify the production function for health. The new production function becomes:

H₁ = (1 - y)H₋₁ + Mt

Substituting the given values, H₋₁ = 1 and TW = 5, we have:

H₁ = (1 - 0.75) + 5

H₁ = 1.25 + 5

H₁ = 6.25

Therefore, the new optimal level of health (H) is 6.25, and the optimal level of the home good (Z₁) remains the same as before, which is (5/3) times the wage (w).

The intuition behind the change is that since health depreciates, the individual needs to allocate more resources towards producing health to maintain the same level of utility. As a result, the optimal level of health increases.

If the individual becomes twice as efficient at producing health with Me (while keeping the depreciation rate), the new production function for health becomes:

H₁ = (1 - y)H₋₁ + 2Me + Mt

Substituting the given values, H₋₁ = 1 and TW = 5, we have:

H₁ = (1 - 0.75) + 2Me + 5

H₁ = 1.25 + 2Me + 5

H₁ = 6.25 + 2Me

Therefore, the new optimal level of health (H) is 6.25 + 2Me, and the optimal level of the home good (Z₁) remains the same as before, which is (5/3) times the wage (w).

The intuition behind the change is that the increased efficiency in producing health with Me allows the individual to produce more health with the same amount of resources. As a result, the optimal level of health increases further.

If the wage (w) rises to $3 per unit of time, the new budget constraint becomes:

2H + Z = 5w

2H + Z = 5(3)

2H + Z = 15

To find the new optimal allocation of health and the home good, we need to solve for H and Z using the updated budget constraint. However, since the production functions for health and the home good remain unchanged, the optimal level of health (H) and the optimal level of the home good (Z₁) will still be the same as in the previous cases.

The intuition behind this is that when the wage increases, the individual's income increases, allowing them to afford more of both health and the home good. However, the optimal allocation of resources between health and the home good remains unchanged because the relative prices of Me and J, as well as the production functions, are not affected by the increase in the wage.

The complete question:

In this question we will solve a simplified version of the Grossman model. Suppose utility is U (Ht, Zt) = Z₁ × Ht. The production function for health is H₁ = Mt + Ht-1 and production for the hom.................t (Hint: Notice these are not functions of TH or T2). Th........me constraint in this example. For the remaining, we focus on a single ...ssume the future does not impact decisions today.

1. What is the budget constraint in this period?

2. Now we will solve for the optimal allocation of health and the home good. Steps;

(a) Calculate the first order conditions of the utility function and set them equal toeach other.

(b) Combine this with the budget constraint and solve for the optimal level of H andZ.

3. Now suppose health depr......n the intuition for why the changes occurs.

4. In we learne......e version of the model from

3. and explain happens to o.......he model and multiply Me by 2 in the production function.) Explain the intuition for why the changes occurs.

5. We know that education ......odel from 4.)

Learn more about Grossman model: https://brainly.com/question/33485556

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

y = -50x -100

When x= 0, plug in 0 to x.

y = -50(0) -100

= 0 - 100

= -100

So in the first y box, you would put -100

I can't tell what the number is in bottom right box so i don't know what x is going to be

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (-3, 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The midpoint of a line segment is the average of the end point coordinates:

  ((1, 1) +(-7, 5))/2 = (1 -7, 1 +5)/2 = (-6, 6)/2 = (-3, 3) . . . midpoint coordinates

The graph of the given equation is plotted below.

The given equation is y=2/7 x.

Graph is a mathematical representation of a network and it describes the relationship between lines and points. A graph consists of some points and lines between them. The length of the lines and position of the points do not matter.

Graph the line using the slope and y-intercept, or two points.

Slope: 2/7

y-intercept: (0, 0)

Plot the points (0, 0) and (7, 2) on the graph

Hence, the graph of the given equation is plotted below.

To learn more about the graph visit:

brainly.com/question/14375099.

#SPJ2

The formula for Permutation is,

The expression given is,

Given:

Plug in n = 9, r = 4

Simplify

Hence, the answer is 3,024.

According to the solving the area of the square is 68.0625.

As is common knowledge, a square is a four-sided, two-dimensional figure. It is also referred to as a quadrilateral. The total quantity of unit squares forming a square is referred to as the square's area. In other words, it is described as the area that the square takes up.

The box formed after cutting the square from each corner will have the dimensions as,

length = 104 - 2x, width = 39 - 2x, height = x.

∴ volume of the box = length × width × height

∴ v = (104 - 2x)(39 - 2x)(x) -----(i)

∴ v = (104 - 2x) (39x - 2\(x^{2}\))

∴ v = 104(39x - 2\(x^{2}\)) -2x(39x - 2\(x^{2}\))

∴ v = 4056x - 208\(x^{2}\) - 78\(x^{2}\) + 4\(x^{3}\)

∴ v = 4\(x^{3}\) - 286\(x^{2}\)  + 4056x

let f(x) =  4\(x^{3}\) - 286\(x^{2}\)  + 4056x  -----(ii)

To, find x for which f(x) is maximum,

⇒we should apply second derivative test ,

According to this test, first we should find critical points at which f'(x) = 0.

then if f''(x) < 0 for that critical point then f(x) is maximum at that critical point.

∴ let us consider, f'(x) = 0.

now, f(x) =  4\(x^{3}\) - 286\(x^{2}\)  + 4056x

⇒ f'(x) = 12\(x^{2}\) - 572x + 4056.  -----(iii)

⇒ f'(x) = 4(3\(x^{2}\) - 143x + 1014)

⇒ f'(x) = 0.

⇒  f'(x) = 4(3\(x^{2}\) - 143x + 1014) = 0

⇒ x = (-b ± \(\sqrt{b^{2} - 4ac }\))/2a    ; where a = 3, b = -143, c = 1014.

∴ x = (-(-143) ± \(\sqrt{(-143)^{2} -4(3)(1014)}\))/2×3

∴ x = (143 ± \(\sqrt{8281}\))/6.

∴ x = \(\frac{143 + 91}{6}\)  , x = \(\frac{143 - 91}{6}\)

⇒ x = 39, 8.25

the square of length 8.25 inch should be cut from each side to det contained with the maximum volume.

Area of the square is = \(x^{2}\) = \(8.25^{2}\)

∴ Area = 68.0625

know more about area of square visit this link:

https://brainly.com/question/1658516

#SPJ4

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

In triangle ΔPQR, we have;

The incenter of the triangle = The point T = The point of the intersection of the angle bisectors

Therefore, the perpendicular distances from T to the sides of ΔPQR are the radius, r, of the inscribed circle of ΔPQR

∴ WT = UT = ST = r

From the figure, WT = 4

∴ WT = UT = ST = 4

ST = 4

Answer: 2

Step-by-step explanation:

I just got the answer correct it's two.

The elk population in 2014 will be 19,700 ,A population is an identified grouping of objects with the purpose of analysis and data collection.

A population is an identified grouping of objects with the purpose of analysis and data collection. Examples include people and animals. It comprises of a related collection of species that live in a specific area and have the ability to interbreed.

The population increased by 12,700-12,000 = 700 between the two measures, however, it did so over a period of 1 year, from 2004 to 2003. Divide 700 elk by 1

The elk population in 2014 will be 19,700We must first establish the method

2014=700 should add 10 times then we will get the 2014th year population.

so the population of 2014th will 19700

To learn more about population refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/25630111

#SPJ1

The formula becomes n ≥ √((b-a)³ * max|f''(x)| * (12/precision))

The sum of angles in a trapezoid-like other quadrilateral is 360°. So in a trapezoid ABCD, ∠A+∠B+∠C+∠D = 360°. Two angles on the same side are supplementary, that is the sum of the angles of two adjacent sides is equal to 180°. The length of the mid-segment is equal to 1/2 the sum of the bases.

To approximate the value of the function using the composite trapezoidal rule, we need to determine the minimum number of points to be considered.

The composite trapezoidal rule uses a series of trapezoids to approximate the area under the curve. The formula for the composite trapezoidal rule is given by:

Approximation = \(\rm h/2 * [f(x_0) + 2f(x_1) + 2f(x_2) + ... + 2*f(x^{n-1}) + f(x^n)]\)

where h is the step size (difference between consecutive x-values) and n is the number of intervals.

To achieve a precision of 10⁻⁵, we need to estimate the number of intervals required. The error formula for the composite trapezoidal rule is:

Error ≤ (b-a) * [(h²)/12] * max|f''(x)|

Given that the maximum of f''(x) on the interval [-1, 2] is not one of the extremes, we need to find the maximum value of f''(x) within that interval.

Next, we need to calculate the error bound using the formula mentioned above and set it less than or equal to the desired precision (10⁻⁵).

Once we have the error bound, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the number of intervals, n. The formula becomes:

n ≥ √((b-a)³ * max|f''(x)| * (12/precision))

Substituting the values for a, b, and the maximum value of f''(x), we can determine the minimum number of intervals, which corresponds to the minimum number of points to be taken into account.

To learn more about Trapezium from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/30816450

#SPJ4

Answer:

(5490-650) ÷ 22 = Y

Step-by-step explanation:

The boundaries of the class 1.87-3.43 are D) 1.865-3.435. The lower boundary is 1.865 and the upper boundary is 3.435.

The boundaries of the class 1.87-3.43 can be determined by subtracting and adding half of the smallest possible unit of measurement to the given class limits. In this case, since the given class limits are 1.87 and 3.43, we need to find the boundaries by subtracting and adding half of the smallest possible unit of measurement.

Let's assume the smallest possible unit of measurement is 0.01.

To find the lower boundary:

Lower Boundary = Lower Limit - (0.01/2)

Lower Boundary = 1.87 - 0.005

Lower Boundary = 1.865

To find the upper boundary:

Upper Boundary = Upper Limit + (0.01/2)

Upper Boundary = 3.43 + 0.005

Upper Boundary = 3.435

Therefore, the boundaries of the class 1.87-3.43 are:

D) 1.865-3.435

To learn more about boundaries

https://brainly.com/question/15319797

#SPJ11

Answer:

axis x=4 & vertex (4,1)

A Triangle is a polygon with three sides.

Foremost, a polygon is a plane figure or a two-dimensional shape with a definite number of line segments, which are connected to form a closed chain.

Thus, if a triangle has three sides, then it is a polygon

The correct answer is option B

To reach the state's goal of having at least 80% of the population vaccinated, approximately 1.6 million more people in Virginia need to receive at least one dose of COVID-19.

People in Virginia need to receive at least one dose of vaccine to reach the state's goal of having at least 80% of population vaccinated:

Number of people needed to receive at least one dose = (80% - 60%) x Population

60% = 0.6

80% = 0.8

Next, we can substitute the given values into formula and solve for  number of people needed:

Number of people needed to receive at least one dose=\((0.8 - 0.6) * 8,000,000\)

Number of people needed to receive at least one dose =\(0.2 * 8,000,000\)

Number of people needed to receive at least one dose = 1,600,000

To know more about COVID-19, here

brainly.com/question/30975256

#SPJ4

--The complete Question is, Suppose the Virginia Department of Health has reported that as of April 1, 2023, 60% of the population in Virginia has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. If the state's goal is to have at least 80% of the population vaccinated, how many more people in Virginia need to receive at least one dose of the vaccine to reach this goal?

Assume that the population of Virginia is 8 million people.--

82.053°??

(Tried going as fast as I can)

Answer:

Katie made more money. Her hourly rate was $9.25 per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

The output changes from code segment 1 to code segment 2 based on which integers are included or excluded from the sum.

Code segment 1 prints the sum of the integers from 1 through 30, inclusive. This means that it adds up all the integers from 1 to 30, including both 1 and 30, and prints their sum. Code segment 2 likely changes the output by either excluding or including certain integers in the sum.
If code segment 2 excludes certain integers, then the sum printed would be smaller than the sum printed in code segment 1. For example, if code segment 2 excludes the integer 15, then the sum would be the sum of all integers from 1 to 14, and then from 16 to 30, which is a smaller sum than the sum of all integers from 1 to 30.
On the other hand, if code segment 2 includes additional integers, then the sum printed would be larger than the sum printed in code segment 1. For example, if code segment 2 includes negative integers, then the sum would include the sum of all negative integers from -30 to -1, in addition to the sum of all positive integers from 1 to 30.
Therefore, the output changes from code segment 1 to code segment 2 based on which integers are included or excluded from the sum.

To know more about Integers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ11