How much money did the u. S. Pay for the louisiana purchase?.

The Warsaw pact was less of a defensive alliance and more of a means to control the soviet satellites states

Because, The Soviet Union was given further control over its satellite states by a provision in the agreement.

     What is the Soviet Union?

To learn more about the Soviet Union visit:https://brainly.com/question/1310325

#SPJ1

Answer:

4 is the answer ² :) good LUCK

Answer:

Using mobile devices and social media can cause physical and mental problems like eye strain and difficulty concentrating on important tasks.

Explanation:

Answer:

The asnwer is two

Explanation:

Colonization ruptured many ecosystems, bringing in new organisms while eliminating others. The Europeans brought many diseases with them that decimated Native American populations. Colonists and Native Americans alike looked to new plants as possible medicinal resources.

They all took movements to conquer different nations to make bigger the Ottoman Empire, and they additionally took efforts to keep their power.

There are many reasons as to why the empire used to be as profitable as it was, however some of them consist of its very robust and equipped military and its centralized political structure. These early, profitable governments make the Ottoman Empire one of the most vital in history

The Ottoman sultan used to be the absolute ruler of the territory. He was the head of the state and head of the government, and his phrases have been the Law. He was the political, military, judicial, social, and spiritual leader. He was once accountable only to Allah and God's Law, regarded as the Seriat (Sharia)

Learn more about Ottoman empire here:

Answer:

≈15

Explanation:

i think

Answer:

26

Explanation:

The Middle East is currently facing various ongoing issues, including conflicts, political instability, sectarian tensions, and economic challenges. These issues can be linked to historical events such as the Crusades and the creation of Israel, which have had long-lasting consequences on the region.

The Middle East continues to grapple with several significant challenges in the present day. One of the major issues is the prevalence of conflicts and political instability. Countries like Syria, Yemen, and Iraq have experienced prolonged conflicts, leading to immense human suffering, displacement, and the rise of extremist groups. These conflicts often have complex historical roots, including colonial legacies, ethnic and sectarian tensions, and power struggles among regional and international actors.

Sectarian tensions also persist in the region, particularly between Sunni and Shia communities. Historical events, such as the early Islamic schism and subsequent power struggles, have contributed to the sectarian divide, which is further exacerbated by contemporary political rivalries and proxy wars.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a central issue in the Middle East. The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and subsequent conflicts have resulted in ongoing disputes over land, resources, and self-determination. The historical connection to the creation of Israel has left a lasting impact on the region, influencing geopolitical dynamics, inter-state relations, and regional alliances.

Moreover, economic challenges, including high unemployment rates, poverty, and income inequality, continue to be pressing issues in many Middle Eastern countries. Historical factors such as colonialism, exploitation of resources, and unequal distribution of wealth have shaped the region's economic landscape, leading to socio-economic disparities and political grievances.

While it is important to acknowledge the historical context and its influence on current issues in the Middle East, it is crucial to approach these complexities with nuance and avoid oversimplifications. The region's challenges are multifaceted and interconnected, necessitating a comprehensive understanding and a holistic approach towards finding sustainable solutions.

Learn more about economic challenges here:

brainly.com/question/30109620

#SPJ11

Southern democrats considered this individual an unworthy candidate because of his opposition to the Lecompton constitution and his support of the freeport doctrine. He was Stephen Douglas.

Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas engaged in a series of discussions while running for the Illinois U.S. Senate seat in 1858. In these debates, the first contender would give an hour-long speech, the second would follow with an hour and a half of rebuttal, and so on.

Four of the seven arguments were opened and ended by Douglas. The second of these discussions took place on August 27, 1858, at Freeport, Illinois. Lincoln questioned Douglas in Freeport over whether a territory's residents could legitimately ban slavery before a state constitution was drafted.

Lincoln was elected as the 16th President as a result of a series of "connected" events, including Douglas' response, which became known as the Freeport Doctrine.

To know more about Stephen Douglas:

https://brainly.com/question/18389847

#SPJ4

Answer:

It is the deadliest terrorist attack in human history and the single deadliest incident for firefighters and law enforcement officers in the history of the United States, with 340 and 72 killed, respectively.

Explanation:

Answer:

The war between the United States and Mexico would end.

Explanation:

I took a quiz with the same question and it counted this answer right.

One thing that was shared by accident during the Columbian exchange was B. Germs.

the Columbian exchange refers to the trade of goods, people, services, and ideas between Africa, Europe, and the Americas.

as a result of people from these continents mingling, germs were spread and people (mostly American natives) died in the millions from not having immunity.

find out more on the Columbian exchange at https://brainly.com/question/14088518.

#SPJ1

Answer:

This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.

Explanation:

Answer:

This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.

He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues.

During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal. However, each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal. After being found guilty and charged with an $1,000 fine, Fields appealed the court’s decision which brings us here.

Abel Fields argued that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional, and that his right to free speech had been violated, therefore, I will be taking in a count of several similar rulings on other cases to help me make a decision.

Answer:

The British lowered some taxes

Answer:

One example of a modern warfare technology used in WW1 was the use of cannons. In previous eras, cannons were typically made of iron and were relatively immobile, as they had to be mounted on sturdy wooden platforms or fired from the back of a wagon. They also had a limited range and were not very accurate.

However, by the time of WW1, cannons were being made of steel, which made them more durable and able to withstand the pressure of firing larger, more powerful shells. They were also mounted on wheels, which made them more mobile and easier to move around the battlefield. In addition, the development of recoil systems allowed cannons to be fired more accurately and at longer ranges. These advancements made cannons a more formidable weapon on the battlefield and contributed to their widespread use in WW1.

Explanation:

Answer:

One example of a warfare technology from WW1 that represented a significant advancement over its counterparts from previous eras is the cannon. During WW1, cannons were much larger and more powerful than they had been in the past, and they were able to fire shells much further and with much greater accuracy. In previous eras, cannons had been relatively small and were used primarily to fire shot or shell over relatively short distances. They were also relatively inaccurate, and it was difficult to aim them accurately at moving targets.

During WW1, however, cannons were much larger and were capable of firing much larger and heavier shells over much greater distances. They were also equipped with sophisticated aiming and firing systems that made it much easier to aim and fire them accurately. These advances made cannons much more effective as weapons of war, and they played a significant role in the outcome of many of the major battles of the war.

Explanation:

Answer:

The partitioning of the Ottoman Empire refers to the division of the empire's territories and assets among the victorious powers after World War I. The Ottomans had sided with the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire) during the war, and as a result, they were forced to give up much of their territory as part of the peace settlement.

One of the territories that was partitioned as a result of the war was Palestine, which had been under Ottoman control for centuries. After the war, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate to administer Palestine, with the stated goal of establishing a national home for the Jewish people. This decision was controversial, and it led to tensions and conflicts between the Arab and Jewish communities in Palestine.

The Arab population of Palestine was opposed to the idea of a Jewish homeland, as they feared that it would lead to the displacement of Arab residents and the loss of Arab land and resources. The Jewish population, on the other hand, saw the mandate as an opportunity to create a new state for the Jewish people, who had faced persecution and discrimination in Europe.

As a result of these conflicting interests, tensions between the Arab and Jewish communities in Palestine continued to escalate. These tensions eventually led to violence and conflict, including the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 and the Israeli War of Independence in 1948. The partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, and the resulting decision to grant a mandate for Palestine to Britain, played a key role in these conflicts and laid the groundwork for the ongoing conflict between Arabs and Jews in the region.

Answer:

During the Great Migration, Blacks began to build a new place for themselves in public life, actively confronting racial prejudice as well as economic, political and social challenges to create a Black urban culture that would exert enormous influence in the decades to come.

Answer:

One essential characteristic of secede is the act of formally withdrawing from a political entity or organization. This often involves a group or region declaring independence and establishing their own government.

Explanation:

The Democratic Party and the National Republican Party both believed in economic growth, territorial expansion, and a strong federal government by 1828.

The Democratic Party and the National Republican Party both believed in economic growth and territorial expansion. They did not believe in federal go. The Democratic Party was created in 1828 and is one of the two oldest political parties in the United States, the other being the Republican Party. The party dominated American politics in the early 19th century and remained a powerful force in American politics until the 1860s.

The National Republican Party was a political party that was formed in 1825. It was formed as a response to the perceived excesses of President Andrew Jackson's policies. The party was short-lived and only existed for about ten years.The two parties had a lot of differences but they had some things in common. Both parties believed in economic growth and territorial expansion. However, both of them believed in federal government.

To know more about National Republican Party, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1204107#

#SPJ11

president herbert hoover angrily ordered the war department to draft the leaders of the protest into military services.

No, all versions of Hamlet are not the same.

What is version?
If the professor instructs you to read Shakespeare's complete works and you choose the Cliff Notes, you may be able to claim that you read a condensed version of the playwright's works, but in reality, you are cheating. Versions are particular iterations or forms of something. comes from the Latin verb vertere, which means "to turn." Consider it as a character taking a turn, similar to how a literary or artistic work is adapted. Can you believe The Sinking of the Lusitania was adapted into an animated film? or a person recounting an event in their own words. The night we were locked in the storage unit, "Your version of what happened is totally different from mine!"

To learn more about version
https://brainly.com/question/922265
#SPJ4

During the 19th century, the response to laissez-faire economics was mixed, with some supporting the doctrine as a means of promoting economic growth and others opposing it for its perceived negative effects on society.

Laissez-faire economics is an economic doctrine that emerged in the 18th century, advocating for minimal government intervention in economic affairs. During the 19th century, the response to laissez-faire economics was mixed, with some supporting the doctrine as a means of promoting economic growth and others opposing it for its perceived negative effects on society.

One of the main criticisms of laissez-faire economics was that it resulted in economic inequality and social injustice. Many believed that unrestricted capitalism, without government regulation, allowed the wealthy to become wealthier while the poor became poorer. This led to the rise of socialist and communist ideologies, which called for a more equal distribution of wealth and resources.

Another response to laissez-faire economics was the growth of labor unions and other workers' organizations. These groups sought to protect the rights and interests of workers, who were often exploited under laissez-faire capitalism.

In response to these criticisms, some governments began to intervene more in economic affairs, implementing policies such as minimum wage laws, antitrust regulations, and social welfare programs. These policies aimed to address the negative consequences of laissez-faire capitalism and promote greater economic and social equality.

However, despite these criticisms, laissez-faire economics continued to be influential throughout the 19th century, especially in countries like the United States and Great Britain. Proponents of laissez-faire economics argued that it promoted economic growth and innovation, and that government intervention in the economy was unnecessary and counterproductive. Ultimately, the response to laissez-faire economics during the 19th century was complex and multifaceted, with both supporters and critics of the doctrine advocating for different approaches to economic policy.

To learn more about Laissez-faire economics:

https://brainly.com/question/16551227

#SPJ4

Vested parties send agents to state capitals and to Washington, D.C. to come down on individuals from Congress and other POLICYMAKERS.

How could people take part in government?

Casting a ballot is one method for taking part in our vote-based system. Residents can likewise contact their authorities when they need to help or change a regulation. Casting a ballot in a political race and reaching our chosen authorities are two different ways that Americans can partake in their majority rules system.

They take part in Campaigning, or the coordinated course of impacting regulation or strategy. Campaigning can take many structures. Vested parties can affirm in Legislative HEARINGS. For instance, quite a long while back, when Congress was thinking about segregation in exclusive hangouts, delegates of the Boy troopers and the Young lady Scouts showed up in hearings to attempt to convince Congress to permit every one to stay a solitary sex association.

Learn more about government here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ4

The operation that General Douglas MacArthur demonstrated his genius for mobility and bypassing enemy strongholds in the southwest Pacific was the island-hopping campaign during World War II.

General Douglas MacArthur employed the strategy of island-hopping in the southwest Pacific as a means of advancing toward the Japanese mainland while bypassing heavily fortified enemy positions. This strategy involved selectively capturing key islands that provided strategic advantages and skipping over others that were heavily defended. By doing so, MacArthur effectively cut off Japanese supply lines and isolated their forces on isolated islands, making it easier to neutralize them.

The island-hopping campaign allowed MacArthur to quickly advance and gain control over crucial islands such as Guadalcanal, New Guinea, and the Philippines. This strategy showcased his understanding of the importance of mobility and the ability to bypass strong enemy positions, rather than engaging in direct assaults that would have resulted in heavy casualties. By employing this approach, MacArthur was able to steadily push the Japanese forces back and eventually liberate territories from their control. The success of the island-hopping campaign demonstrated MacArthur's strategic acumen and his ability to adapt to the challenges of the Pacific theater of war.

To learn more about  MacArthur Click Here: brainly.com/question/17300951

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hyksos

Explanation:

Hyksos were said to have originated from the Phoenicia region, which is located in the Southwest of Asia. The people of Hyksos were believed to have been a mix of Jewish and Arab origin. They were known to be excellent warriors with advanced weapons and warfare compared to the Egyptians.

The Hyksos conquered Egypt around the period of 1720 to 1710 BC. They were mostly equipped with horse-drawn chariots and weapons from bronze and iron.

Fillmore’s letter has a tone of friendliness and passive request when compared to Commodore Matthew Perry’s letter.

Millard Fillmore was the 13th President of the United States, serving from 1850 to 1853. He was the last member of the Whig party to hold the presidency and took office after the death of President Zachary Taylor. Fillmore's presidency is notable for his support of the Compromise of 1850 and his role in the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given.

learn more about Millard Fillmore: https://brainly.com/question/536940

#SPJ1

Answer:

morphine, heroin, and cocaine

Explanation:

In 1912, an international conference was held to discuss controls on the opium trade. Great Britain wanted substances like morphine and cocaine included in the discussion, as these were replacing opium in terms of use and abuse. This led to several countries agreeing to control international trade and domestic sale and use of these substances.

The conference aimed to establish regulations on the production and distribution of opium and its derivatives, as well as substances like morphine and cocaine. These substances were increasingly being used for non-medical purposes, leading to addiction and other social issues. By including these substances in the discussion, the conference aimed to address a broader range of drug-related problems.
As a result of the conference, participating countries agreed to establish controls on the international trade and domestic sale and use of these substances. This included implementing licensing systems for the import and export of these drugs, as well as regulating the sale and use within their borders. These measures were intended to reduce the illicit trade and abuse of opium, morphine, cocaine, and other similar substances.
to know international conference visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30665515

#SPJ11

Answer:

a s  s s s

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is C) Religious Conflict

Answer:

On 21 February 1613, a Zemsky Sobor elected Michael Romanov as Tsar of Russia, establishing the Romanovs as Russia's second reigning dynasty.

Explanation:

Michael's grandson Peter I, who established the Russian Empire in 1721, transformed the country into a great power through a series of wars and reforms.

According to Article II of the US Constitution, all federal judges must be confirmed by the c) Senate.

Article II of the United States Constitution outlines the executive branch's powers and limitations, including the President's powers and the procedures for presidential elections. According to Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . Judges of the Supreme Court and all other Officers of the United States." This clause establishes that the Senate must consent to the appointment of all federal judges.

The Senate is one of the two chambers of Congress, which is the legislative branch of the US government. The Senate consists of 100 members, with two senators representing each state. The Senate has the power to approve or reject presidential nominees, such as federal judges, ambassadors, and executive branch officials, through a process known as advice and consent.

Therefore, the correct answer is c) Senate.

Learn more about Article II of the United States Constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/28768341

#SPJ11

Article II of the Constitution of the United States establishes the Executive Branch of the government and lays out the duties and powers of the president.

It also includes details about the appointment and confirmation of federal judges. According to Article II of the Constitution of the United States, the Senate must confirm all federal judges. This means that after the president nominates someone to be a federal judge, the Senate holds confirmation hearings to evaluate the nominee's qualifications. If a majority of Senators approve the nominee, they are confirmed as a federal judge.The confirmation process is an important part of the checks and balances system in the U.S. government. It ensures that the president does not have unchecked power to appoint judges who could potentially make biased or unfair decisions. Instead, the Senate has a say in who is appointed to the federal judiciary.

To know more about president visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ11