how does lady macbeth's behavior differ when she is awkae versus when she is sleeping

Answer:

The type of definition that is provided in the sentence is: Informal definition.

Explanation:

What is an Informal Definition?

An informal definition is a way of explaining the meaning of a word in simple language that is equally tailored to the need of the immediate audience.

This definition of independence is an informal definition because it is free from classifications and is applied to the context in which the word is used

Answer:

Explanation: no it wasent coumon  because on page 56 it says that "the  community was extraordarily safe .

The word among the answer choices that is associated with John Thornton through the eye of Buck is love, option C, since he shows affection for Buck.

In Jack London's novel "The Call of the Wild," the main character is the dog Buck. John Thornton is one of the men who become Buck's owner. However, he is different than the ones who came before him.

After becoming a sled-dog, Buck has not experienced love or a decent treatment. His owners regard him as some sort of machine, not a living being. But that changes when Thornton comes around. The man is kind, affectionate and playful. He truly likes Buck and treats him well, speaking to him lovingly.

Therefore, we can conclude that Buck would associate the word love with John Thornton. Option C is the right answer.

Learn more about John Thornton here:

https://brainly.com/question/26562099

#SPJ1

John Proctor admits to having an affair with Abigail only when all of the above circumstances converge.

Firstly, Reverend Hale's suspicion of Proctor's involvement with Abigail acts as a catalyst. As a keen observer, Hale senses the underlying tension between Proctor and Abigail, leading him to suspect an illicit relationship.

Secondly, Abigail's threat to expose the truth to the court forces Proctor to confront his actions.

Fearful of the consequences, Proctor realizes the gravity of the situation and understands that the truth may come out regardless of his admission.

Lastly, the pivotal moment occurs when Proctor comprehends that his confession might be a means to save his wife, Elizabeth, from an unjust death sentence.

Understanding the dire consequences of remaining silent, he musters the courage to admit his transgression and expose the truth, ultimately setting in motion the events of Arthur Miller's renowned play, "The Crucible."

For more such questions on John Proctor

https://brainly.com/question/29669207

#SPJ8

Answer:

Of course!  I'll give you a few different sentences for the short story.

Explanation:

I begin to spin the dial on the telephone, waiting to call my friend to wish (her/him/them) a happy birthday.

Sighing, I stand up and begin tweaking the antenna on the television for father.

My sibling and I lay on the floor in the living room, listening to Father Knows Best (a radio show).

I hope these are sufficient. Good luck! :)

Johns's decision is rational because the consequences of low workplace motivation are well-documented. They include:

In addition, the above issues may spread and convert your office into a toxic atmosphere.

Motivated employees are more likely to work harder, arrive on time, and concentrate on their daily tasks. Productivity levels may rise, and a company's overall production may rise. Quality has been enhanced, as has customer service.

Employees who are motivated are more likely to be productive than those who are not. If an employee is content and happy, he or she will execute his or her work in a very spectacular manner, and the outcome will be positive; on the other hand, a motivated employee will stimulate other employees in the workplace.

Learn more about motivation:
https://brainly.com/question/972761
#SPJ1

Full Question:

John would rather spend $2,000 to get rid of an unmotivated employee than to invest time and cash in training someone who is not fully motivated to work for the company. Why is John's action rational?

Answer:

Mr. Utterson and Mr. Hyde differ in many ways, but the statement that best describes their difference is: Mr. Utterson is a respectable, law-abiding citizen, while Mr. Hyde is a criminal who engages in immoral behavior.

Mr. Utterson is a lawyer who is well-respected in his community and serves as a trustee for many wealthy clients. He is a man of high moral character who abides by the law and holds himself to a high standard of conduct.

In contrast, Mr. Hyde is a criminal who is described as "deformed" and "sinister." He is known for engaging in immoral behavior, such as trampling a young girl and committing murder.

Therefore, the biggest difference between Mr. Utterson and Mr. Hyde is their moral character and behavior.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

an opinion is how the writer personally feels or thinks about a certain situation therefore there is no need for legitimate evidence

Answer:

No, schools should not limit what you learn about history because people need to know what happened before some of us were born.

Explanation:

I do not think schools should do that because if is not fair to whitewash the history that happened before time and it is not fair because people need to know what happened to black people before time.

Answer:

The other person

Explanation:

Answer:

including  

and  

In past

As these

even though  

However

Explanation:

sorry if some of them are wrong

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Because the title is interesting and the reader will want to read more

Answer:

The pastor

Explanation:

____________

Answer:

C) tells the story through the eyes of a single character

Explanation:

In the third-person limited omniscient point of view, the story is narrated by the point of view of a single character. The story is told according to the perspective of a character and his thoughts and interpretations are disclosed. It is usually the main character who is the narrator of the story. The thoughts of the secondary characters remain uncertain.

The word that correctly completes the given sentence has been highlighted below:

She is in the annoying habit of forever practicing her scales on that out-of-tune piano.

This refers to the part of speech that is used in a given sentence in order to show action or 'doing' in a given sentence and is considered a major part of speech.

Hence, we can see that based on the complete text, the word that best completes the sentence from the list of given options has been highlighted above,

Read more about verbs here:

https://brainly.com/question/1718605

#SPJ1

She _____ forever practicing her scales on that out-of-tune piano.

anonymous

is, was, has been, enjoys, is in the annoying habit of, etc

Answer:

It seems like you are interested in learning about various strategies in decoding the meaning of words. ill do my best to help you out with that.

Explanation:

Using context clues: This means using the surrounding words or sentences to infer the meaning of an unknown word. For example, if you encounter the word ‘gargantuan’ in a sentence like ‘The gargantuan elephant towered over the other animals’, you can guess that it means very large or huge.

Using word parts: This means breaking down a word into its smaller components, such as prefixes, suffixes, roots, and base words, and analyzing how they affect the meaning of the word. For example, if you encounter the word ‘unhappy’, you can recognize that it has a prefix ‘un-’ that means not, and a base word ‘happy’ that means feeling or showing pleasure. Therefore, you can deduce that ‘unhappy’ means not feeling or showing pleasure.

Using reference materials: This means consulting dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses, or other sources that provide definitions, synonyms, antonyms, or explanations of words. For example, if you encounter the word ‘abhor’, you can look it up in a dictionary and find out that it means to hate or detest something.

These are some of the effective decoding strategies that can help you improve your reading comprehension and vocabulary skills. I hope this information is helpful to you.

Answer:

Wait a minute, why should Wendy give up her life, her dreams, to stay with Peter and never grow up? If they are such a perfect couple, shouldn't he have to meet her half-way?

Explanation:

Yes, to love someone you have to let them be who they are, but can you love them as they need to be loved if you feel that you have to give up yourself to love them? It seems like perhaps by allowing Peter to stay and remain a little boy forever, by not pressuring him into returning with her and growing up, which is what we can pretty clearly see that Wendy wants to do - she wants love and marriage and motherhood from the very beginning of the story, she is loving him the best way she can. She is letting him go and living her life as completely as she can.

By letting Wendy go back to the mundane world and grow up while Peter remains in his fairyland, forever a child, Barrie is perhaps showing us that self and love transcend such things. People are who they are, whether it means they become responsible adults or remain forever child-like and that it is possible for them to respect and love each other, despite their differences. Perhaps they will never be able to be lovers, but perhaps that is not what they need from one another. Perhaps what they need is the love and understanding of a friend who never forgets them, even when everyone else does.

Answer:

Before Peter Pan went back to Neverland, Wendy asked him if will he come back and Peter said yes 'cause he wants to hear her stories about him and the pirates. After that, he went back to Neverland with Tinkerbell." and  Wendy can't leave her family, while Peter can't leave Neverland, so they chose to just part ways.

Explanation:

so yeaa

Answer:

Either b or c

Explanation:

Quentin's question from "That Evening Sun," shows that Quentin is matured. He was too immature to realize racial prejudice and understands later in life how unfortunate Nancy's circumstances were.

In "That Evening Sun," white Southerners are depicted as being callous toward Nancy, one of their black employees, who suffers from paralysing phobias. Quentin's impressions are those of a child since he recounts the events of the story as he remembered them at the age of nine. Because of his immaturity, he is only able to perceive Nancy's distressing conditions at the end of the novel.

However, he worries more about his own well-being than Nancy's fate, fretting about something as unimportant as who would do the family's laundry once she passes away. His egotism suggests that he views her death as unimportant.

Know more about Quentin here

https://brainly.com/question/858484

#SPJ1

The three events from the book Elements of Fantasy: Writing a More Magical Story that is told there are:

It is impossible for the events depicted in fantasy novels to occur in actual life (as we know it, at least). The action frequently takes place on a different planet or in an as-yet-undiscovered realm of this world and incorporates magic or witchcraft.

With this in mind, elements of fantasy writing do not happen to me frequently because they are usually fictitious or things that are not real.

Read more about Fantasy Writing here:

https://brainly.com/question/25217833

#SPJ1

To make his evaluation more effective, Horus should add examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence, as well as an evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidence.

1. Examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence: By including specific examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence, Horus can provide concrete illustrations to support his evaluation. These examples will help to clarify Smith's position and make the evaluation more comprehensive and persuasive. Moreover, the use of examples will allow Horus to analyze and critique the quality and relevance of Smith's reasoning and evidence.

2. An evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidence: In order to make his evaluation more effective, Horus should critically assess Smith's reasoning and evidence. This involves analyzing the logical coherence of Smith's arguments, identifying any flaws or fallacies, and evaluating the reliability and validity of the evidence presented. By offering an objective evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidence, Horus can provide a balanced perspective and demonstrate his own analytical skills.

By incorporating these two elements into his evaluation, Horus will enhance its overall effectiveness. The examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence will provide context and support for his evaluation, while the evaluation itself will demonstrate his ability to critically assess arguments and evidence. Additionally, Horus should consider including a sentence introducing the topic of the argument to provide clarity and context, as well as a conclusion summarizing the claim and evaluation to ensure a cohesive and concise evaluation.

For more such questions on evaluation, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/1159837

#SPJ8

The probable question may be:

What should Horus add to his evaluation to make it more effective? Select two options.a statement summarizing Smith's claimexamples of Smith's reasoning and evidencean evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidencea sentence introducing the topic of the argumenta conclusion summarizing the claim and evaluation

Answer:

No

Explanation:

For example in the U.S. many people oppose the LGBTQ restrictions in health placed by the government.

In order to live a simple life without material goods and refrain from engaging in activities that would offer him pleasure, Siddhartha transformed into an ascetic.

Siddhartha also made an effort to practice disciplined meditation in an effort to comprehend suffering. Siddhartha sought to understand the causes of human suffering as well as potential solutions. He made the decision to depart from the palace and his family in order to search for answers in the outside world. To learn more about pain, he abandoned all of his things including designer clothing.

The three sections represent the three phases that Siddhartha experiences on his path to enlightenment: the thought phase; the flesh phase; and the transcendence phase. Siddhartha intentionally begins to let the self die during this time, which is the sphere of the intellect, in an effort to escape his Self.

To earn more about Siddhartha here:

https://brainly.com/question/8688865

#SPJ1

In order to live a simple life without material goods and refrain from engaging in activities that would offer him pleasure, Siddhartha transformed into an ascetic.

Siddhartha also made an effort to practice disciplined meditation in an effort to comprehend suffering. Siddhartha sought to understand the causes of human suffering as well as potential solutions. He made the decision to depart from the palace and his family in order to search for answers in the outside world. To learn more about pain, he abandoned all of his things including designer clothing.

The three sections represent the three phases that Siddhartha experiences on his path to enlightenment: the thought phase; the flesh phase; and the transcendence phase. Siddhartha intentionally begins to let the self die during this time, which is the sphere of the intellect, in an effort to escape his Self.

To earn more about Siddhartha here:

https://brainly.com/question/8688865

#SPJ1

Incomplete question. The attached image is likely where the question is gotten from.

Explanation:

The expression "wanna toss the ol' virtual pigskin" used by Twohy after he depicts a man fully immense in his work; showing him in a virtual world likely portrays his argument against been a workaholic.

In a sense, he is saying/arguing that taking a break from work isn't a bad idea.

Answer:

To compromise means to give up something that you want in order to reach an agreement or solution. To know when to compromise, identify your thoughts on the situation and determine whether giving up your want would be beneficial to you or others. You need to understand how important the issue is to yourself and then learn what consequences may arise if you do not make the compromise.

Answer:

A rhyme? Comment more specifically if not.

The term "holding" in legalese refers to the main legal contention or tenet that a court upholds in its judgement. It is the section of the court's decision that addresses the arguments made by the parties and establishes the case's outcome.

A judicial opinion's holding, which is its most important component, is frequently summed up in the case's headnote or syllabus. It is the case's legal precedent that can be mentioned and relied upon in subsequent proceedings.

1) It should be noted that the primary distinction between these two instances is that Shaw v. Reno dealt with racial discrimination in redistricting, whereas Smith v. Allwright dealt with racial discrimination in voting. The Equal Protection Clause was at issue in both cases, although different issues were raised by this constitutional clause.

2) These rulings differ because Smith v. Allwright found that the "white primary" system is illegal because it violates the Equal Protection Clause by denying people the ability to vote on the basis of race. On the other side, Shaw v. Reno's ruling states that the in question redistricting plan is illegal because it violates the Equal Protection Clause by prioritizing race when determining district lines.

3) Primary elections, which are frequently under the jurisdiction of political parties, must be open to all voters regardless of race, according to the Smith v. Allwright decision, which illustrated the relationship between political parties and the government.

To learn more about holding law, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18648900

#SPJ4

If we are to consider the ending of Life of Pi, where Pi presents two options for his story: the original story, Pi is in the lifeboat with animals, or the second version, where Pi is in the lifeboat with people, I would say that the second version is more convincing and horrific.

This refers to the term that is used to describe the similarities and differences that exist between two or more different entities and the common factor that links them together.

Hence, it can be seen that in the first story, there is a narration where Pi is in the lifeboat with animals, but the second version is more convincing because he retells the shipwreck, his survival, and then becomes a Taiwanese sailor, with his mother, and a cook

With this in mind, it can be seen that the second version is more convincing and horrific.

Read more about Life of Pi here:

https://brainly.com/question/28141957

#SPJ1

Fatima, Julia, and Felipe work together to solve the problem of the power outage on campus with the help of Mr. Green. And the oil that was present with Fatima.

As there was a power outage that was presented. There were four girls and Mr. green who after the outage of light have gone to access the situation. They went to make sure that the power will be on. They used the hair oil that helped in greasing the switch.

The evidence provided is "The trio raced around the room, looking for the remaining "PW" switches by the light of their phone ja Using Fatima's hair oil when needed, they turned all of the switches to the "Manual On" setting. The room was alive with sound and light when they finished."

Learn more about power outage, here:

https://brainly.com/question/20903737

#SPJ9