Answers
Due to the divergent societal visions that each of these ideologies aspires to advance, there may be tensions and conflicts with pre-existing social and political systems.
Communism, fascism, and nationalism are all political ideologies that can challenge the existing political and social order in different ways.
Communism, for example, challenges the existing order by advocating for the abolition of private property and a classless society. This directly challenges the capitalist system and can lead to tensions between those who support communism and those who support capitalism. Additionally, communism often advocates for the centralization of power in the state, which can challenge existing political systems that are based on democratic principles.
Fascism, on the other hand, challenges the existing order by promoting extreme nationalism and a strong authoritarian leader. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on individual freedoms and democratic principles. Fascism often seeks to suppress dissenting voices and limit civil liberties, which can further challenge the existing social order.
Nationalism, while not as extreme as communism or fascism, can still challenge the existing political and social order by emphasizing the importance of a particular nation or ethnic group over others. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on multiculturalism and inclusivity. Additionally, nationalism can lead to the exclusion and mistreatment of minority groups, which can further challenge the existing social order.
Overall, communism, fascism, and nationalism all present challenges to the existing political and social order in different ways. Each of these ideologies seeks to promote a different vision for society, which can lead to tensions and conflict with existing political and social structures.
Learn more about political systems here
https://brainly.com/question/30814255
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Examples of how Congress oversees the power of the executive branch is its power to
A: approve presidential appointments and conduct investigations
B: create regulations that only apply to official executive offices
C: sign the president's policies into law and enforce regulations
D: impeach executive officials for creating too much red tape
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Kennedy v. Shave Barbor Co case(business Law)• Legal What "legitimate business interests" justify the enforce-ment of a noncompete provision? • Economic What sort of harm, particularly in Kennedy’s situation, would support a court’s refusal to enforce an employment contract’s noncompete provision?
Answers
In the case of Kennedy v. Shave Barbor Co, the "legitimate business interests" that could justify the enforcement of a non-compete provision include protecting trade secrets, confidential information, customer relationships, and goodwill.
Noncompete provisions are intended to protect employers' legitimate business interests. These interests can include safeguarding trade secrets and confidential information, maintaining customer relationships, and preserving the goodwill of the business.
In Kennedy's case, if enforcing the noncompete provision would unduly restrict his ability to find employment or pursue his chosen profession, it could result in a court refusing to enforce the provision. The harm to Kennedy would be in the form of a significant limitation on his employment opportunities and potentially depriving him of his livelihood.
Therefore, a court may consider the balance between the employer's legitimate interests and the harm caused to the employee in deciding whether to enforce the noncompete provision.
To know more about non-compete here https://brainly.com/question/30508349
#SPJ4
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
Answers
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
Describe Immanuel Kant’s idea of the Golden Rule or the ethics of reciprocity.
Answers
Answer:
Isn't the golden rule is to treat others how u wanna be treated?
Explanation:
Im not sure if this is correct but I think it is.
1. Identify five similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights discussed in
Lesson 3.
2. Identify five rights from the UN articles that you would like to add to a list of guarantees
under the US Constitution.
3. Are any rights that you believe should be included but that are missing from either the US
Bill of Rights or the UN Declaration of Human Rights? Give at least two to three rights.
Answers
1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
Padma is interested in becoming a US citizen. What should her first step be?
Answers
Answer: Naturalization with green car can be earn by 3-5years military service
Explanation:
Answer:
Step One: Find Out Whether You Are Eligible for U.S. Citizenship
The first question is whether you have a U.S. green card (lawful permanent residence). With few exceptions, you must obtain a green card before you become eligible to apply for citizenship. So if you haven't yet reached this point, learn about your eligibility by reading Can You Get a U.S. Green Card?.
As a lawful permanent resident, you must meet additional requirements in order to be eligible for U.S. citizenship. These concern the length of time you've spent in the U.S. as a green card holder, your good moral character, your ability to pass a test in English, and on U.S. history and government, and more.
To check on whether you are eligible, see Who Is Eligible to Become a Naturalized U.S. Citizen?
Now would also be a good time to begin improving your English, if need be, and studying the possible questions that appear on the exam. There are 100 total questions the USCIS examiner can draw from, and you'll need to be able to answer six out of 12 correctly in order to pass.
The California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) provides that no trade or business expense deduction is allowed for expenditures made at, or payments made to, a club that restricts membership or the use of its services or facilities on the basis of which of the following:
Answers
Business losses of the following kinds cannot be deducted from business income: losses incurred before the firm has even started. losses a firm experiences when it closes. losses sustained as a result of capital asset damage, destruction, etc.
Which costs not allowable to be claimed as a business expense?Any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalties, fees for professional services, fees for technical services, or any other sum payable to a resident contractor shall not be allowed as a deduction in the prior year in which the expenses are incurred, when determining the income chargeable under the head "Profit."
Personal or business charges that you cannot deduct from your gross income while filing your taxes are known as nondeductible expenses. On the other hand, deductible expenses are costs that you can deduct from your income to reduce your tax obligation.
To know more about business expense, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29679593
#SPJ1
Sanitation rules are established by:
A. the department of revenue
B. the governor
C. the board of cosmo and barbers examiner
D. the board of complaints
Answers
Answer:
The answer is probably C because I looked it up on the internet.
Does the fact that Schmitz did not plan to shoot Senator Blount mean he should not have been arrested? In other words, to what extent should the intent of the person who sends a violent threat online matter?
Answers
why were toll roads a popular alternative to traditional roadways when conservative officials took over the power of the state government?
Answers
Toll roads became a popular alternative to traditional roadways when conservative officials took over the power of the state government for several reasons: Fiscal Responsibility, Free Market Approach, etc.
Fiscal Responsibility: Conservative officials often prioritize fiscal responsibility and limited government spending. Toll roads offer a way to generate revenue for infrastructure development and maintenance without relying solely on taxpayer dollars. By implementing tolls, they can shift the financial burden from the general public to the users of the road, thereby promoting a sense of individual responsibility.
Free Market Approach: Conservative officials generally support free-market principles and limited government intervention. Toll roads are seen as a market-driven solution where private entities can invest in and operate the infrastructure. This approach aligns with the belief that private enterprise can be more efficient and innovative in managing and maintaining roads.
User-Pay Model: Toll roads follow a user-pay model, where individuals who use the roads bear the cost. This principle resonates with conservative ideologies of individual responsibility and avoiding the redistribution of wealth. Supporters argue that it is fair for road users to directly contribute to the upkeep of the infrastructure they benefit from.
Reduced Government Control: Conservative officials often advocate for reducing government control and bureaucracy. Implementing toll roads can be seen as a way to decrease government involvement in transportation, allowing private entities to take on a greater role in managing and financing the roadways.
It's important to note that these reasons are generalizations and may not apply universally. The decision to implement toll roads can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the priorities of conservative officials in each state.
To know more about Fiscal Responsibility, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29790045
#SPJ11
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
Question 16
2 pts
erma enters into a contract to buy a tract of lakefront property from forest acres to build and sell a
residential development. forest acres fails to close the sale. erma's remedy is most likely
the amount that erma invested in the project to the date of the closing.
o nothing-forest acres still owns the land.
o the difference between the contract and market prices of the land.
specific performance.
question 17
2 pts
Answers
The "Contract Price" refers to the specific price that a given buyer and seller have decided upon to sell a particular house. The Appraised Value is a certified assessment of what the market as a whole could be willing to pay for a house.
Can the price on a contract be changed?Typically, neither you nor the vendor has the authority to unilaterally alter the conditions. However, some agreements are made with the option for price adjustments in case project size and scope change in the future.
What drives market pricing?The combination between supply and demand determines market pricing. The balance between supply and demand determines an equilibrium price.
To know more about Contract Price visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14450413
#SPJ4
Liability as an accomplice does not extend to negligent and reckless conduct on the part of a
primary actor that results in a criminal offense.
False
True
Answers
"A legal owner of property has the right to use that property in any way they want to, and the power to give those rights to another. This is called"
Answers
Answer:
Property Interest
Explanation:
"A legal owner of property has the right to use that property in any way they want to, and the power to give those rights to another. This is called Property Interest.
What is property interest?The right to own or utilize property is referred to as a legal interest in that property. It belongs to the registered owner, or the person listed on the title deeds at the Land Registry.
The owner has the power to govern the property due to their legal interest, which allows them to determine whether to sell or transfer it.
The rights that people have in their property are referred to as ownership interests. Property interest is a broad topic that includes ownership duration, ownership proportion, transfer rights, encumbrance rights, & rights of survivorship.
To learn more about Property interest
https://brainly.com/question/14330082
#SPJ5
Which of the following is a quality of a command economy?
Individuals determine what goods and services are produced.
The government determines the demand for goods and services.
Training and education for jobs are determined by business firms.
Wages and employment opportunities for individuals are determined by the government.
Answers
Answer:
Individuals determine what goods and services are produced.
Explanation:
NOT the goverment person jesus lord
If you live on the border of Trenton and Pennsylvania does common in law apply?
Answers
Sorry if this is not the answer you're looking for..
"New Jersey does not recognize common law marriages. In Pennsylvania, a couple may claim to be common law married if there is clear and convincing evidence that the couple exchanged words, in the present tense, for the specific purpose of establishing the legal relationship of husband and wife."
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answers
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
true/false. according to the congressional digest, more than one million wells in the united states use hydraulic fracturing (congressional digest, 2012, p. 71).
Answers
As of March 2012, hydraulic fracturing has been applied to more than 1 million wells nationwide. The statement is True.
According to the information you provided, as of March 2012, hydraulic fracturing had been utilized in over 1 million wells across the United States. Please note that my previous response mentioned that I cannot confirm the accuracy of specific claims or access real-time data, but based on the information you provided, the statement is true as of March 2012.
Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is a technique used to extract natural gas and oil from deep underground rock formations. It involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure into the well, creating fractures in the rock and allowing the hydrocarbons to flow more freely.
To learn more about Hydraulic fracturing, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31032804
#SPJ4
each state has its own system for providing for the defense of indigent defendants. which is not one of these systems?
Answers
There is no national or federal system for providing for the defense of indigent defendants in the United States. Therefore, the answer is "a national or federal system" as it does not exist for the defense of indigent defendants in the US.
Each state is responsible for developing and implementing its own system for providing legal representation to indigent defendants.
In the United States, there is a federal system for providing legal representation to indigent defendants in federal criminal cases. The federal government has a Public Defender Service (PDS) that provides legal representation to defendants who cannot afford an attorney in federal criminal cases. The PDS is funded by the federal government and is separate from the state-based systems for providing legal representation to indigent defendants in state criminal cases.
To know more about federal system here
https://brainly.com/question/5496965
#SPJ4
just say 10 and you will get 10 points
Answers
Answer:
10
Explanation:
Answer:
ya
Explanation:
When is piracy considered qualified?
Answers
Answer: An act of piracy must meet very specific criteria to be considered an act of piracy according to the International Maritime Bureau.
Explanation: Among those criteria are: The pirates must board another vessel; The pirates must intend to steal or commit another crime.
This is not Plagiarized and can be directly copied and pasted to whatever assignment your working on.
How widely is a police report viewed within the criminal justice field and why? What are the negative consequences of a poorly written or incomplete report?
Answers
A police report is a document prepared by a police officer that describes the details of an incident they have investigated. These reports are widely used within the criminal justice field as they serve as a record of the incident and provide a basis for further investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings.
What is the police report about?
Poorly written or incomplete police reports can have negative consequences as they can lead to confusion, misunderstandings, and errors in the handling of a case. They can also cause the case to be dismissed due to lack of evidence or credibility. In addition, if the report is not written clearly or if it contains inaccuracies, it can make it difficult for a prosecutor to build a strong case against the defendant.
Moreover, it may also be used against the police officer in court if they are challenged by the defense attorney on their investigation or testimony.
Learn more about criminal justice from
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
What was the result at the u. S. Supreme court level in the case opener involving the constitutionality of the individual mandate of the affordable care act requiring that most americans obtain minimum essential health insurance contained within the affordable care act?.
Answers
Learn more about this solution
The individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which required most Americans to maintain a particular level of healthcare coverage or pay a fine, was contested in 2012.
The Supreme Court upheld the appeal on the basis that the individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act was an acceptable application of Congress's taxing authority. The initial comprehensive health care reform statute as well as its revisions are collectively referred to as the "Affordable Care Act" (ACA). The law focuses on medical expenses, health insurance coverage, and preventive care. The ACA is upheld in court, preserving coverage for millions of individuals. The lawsuit brought by 18 Republican state attorneys general and the Trump administration was dismissed in June 2021 when the Supreme Court found that opponents of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) lacked standing.
In essence, management was fired. The Supreme Court concluded 7-2 that red states lack the legal authority to contest the individual requirement of the statute. According to the judgement delivered on Thursday, the states were unable to show that the enforcement of the rule had resulted in a "past or future injury." Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch abstained from voting.
Learn more about Affordable Care Act (ACA) hear :
https://brainly.com/question/28722911
#SPJ4
Which of the following cannot be discharged by filing bankruptcy?
a. Credit card debt.
b. Mortgaged debt.
c. Student loan.
Answers
The option is c. Student loan.Bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual or business declares that they cannot repay their debts, and their assets are liquidated, or a payment plan is agreed upon to pay their debts. Bankruptcy can eliminate some debts and prevent creditors from collecting them, but it cannot discharge all debts.
While bankruptcy can discharge or eliminate some debts, student loans cannot be discharged by filing for bankruptcy. This is because student loans are considered "nondischargeable" under bankruptcy law. This means that regardless of the type of bankruptcy filed, student loan debt will not be discharged unless the debtor can prove "undue hardship."Credit card debt can be discharged by filing bankruptcy, but it is important to note that the ability to discharge credit card debt will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. Mortgaged debt can also be discharged by filing bankruptcy, but the debtor will lose their property as part of the bankruptcy process if they cannot catch up with their payments.
To know more about Bankruptcy visit-
brainly.com/question/30628707
#SPJ11
When was the Constitution Act enacted?
A)1981
B)1982
C)1868
D)1867
What did the Constitution Act do?
A) Made Canada a fully independent nation
B) Unified the 10 provinces of Canada
C) Fully repatriated the constitution
D) Reorganized Canada into a federation
Answers
Answer:
i think it is B I'm not sure
In a civil case, the object is to a. resolve a dispute to the satisfaction of all concerned parties. b. obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party. c. punish a wrongdoer to deter others from similar actions. d. take coercive action against a violating party.
Answers
In a civil case, the object is to obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party.
The Civil CaseCivil cases involve those conflicts cases between people or businesses.
These court cases deal with finances or damage to individual rights.
A civil case begins when an individual or business reasons to have been hurt by another person or company.
The civil cases are between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Thus option B is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the Civil Case" here:
brainly.com/question/1065754
When and how a penalty is to be executed?
Answers
Answer: Capital Punishment, also called death penalty, execution of an offender sentenced to death after convinction by a court of law of a criminal offense.
pls help
If a business has not made a profit,
a. it doesn't have to pay income tax.
b. it cannot pay its employees.
c. it has no capital to put back into the business.
d. both a and c
Answers
if you wanted to hear an oral argument in the texas supreme court, you would
Answers
To hear an oral argument in the Texas Supreme Court, you would need to follow these steps:
Check the court's schedule or website for the date and time of the oral argument you're interested in.
Arrive at the Texas Supreme Court building in Austin before the designated time.
Go through security procedures and find the courtroom where the argument will take place.
Enter the courtroom and find an available seat.
Listen attentively to the oral arguments presented by the attorneys, respecting the court's rules and decorum.
To attend an oral argument in the Texas Supreme Court, check the schedule, arrive early, go through security, find the courtroom, and listen attentively to the arguments.
For more such questions on Supreme Court, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30490295
#SPJ11
An individual paid taxes 27 months ago, but did not file a tax return for that year. Now the individual wants to file a claim for refund of federal income taxes that were paid at that time. The individual must file the claim for refund within which of the following time periods after those taxes were paid?
a. Four years.
b. One year.
c. Two years.
d. Three years.
Answers
The correct option is d). An individual must file the claim for refund within three years after those taxes were paid.
According to the general rule outlined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, the statute of limitations for filing a claim for refund of federal income taxes is three years from the date the original tax return was due or within two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later.
In this scenario, the individual paid the taxes 27 months ago but did not file a tax return for that year. If the tax payment was made within the past three years, the individual has the opportunity to file a claim for a refund. However, it's important to note that specific circumstances or exceptions could affect the statute of limitations, and it's advisable to consult with a tax professional or refer to IRS guidelines for precise and up-to-date information.
To learn more about Claim For Refund, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30068175
#SPJ11
The correct option is d). An individual must file the claim for refund within three years after those taxes were paid.
According to the general rule outlined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, the statute of limitations for filing a claim for refund of federal income taxes is three years from the date the original tax return was due or within two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later. In this scenario, the individual paid the taxes 27 months ago but did not file a tax return for that year. If the tax payment was made within the past three years, the individual has the opportunity to file a claim for a refund.
However, it's important to note that specific circumstances or exceptions could affect the statute of limitations, and it's advisable to consult with a tax professional or refer to IRS guidelines for precise and up-to-date information.
To learn more about Claim for Refund, click here:
brainly.com/question/30068175
#SPJ11