Answers
Answer: The Joined together States Incomparable Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust degree that precluded anticompetitive behavior in commerce) connected to the railroad industry, indeed although the U.S. Congress had sanctioned a comprehensive administration of controls for that industry.
Explanation:
Related Questions
You are the prosecutor on a domestic violence-related murder. A husband brutally stabbed his wife more than 20 times. The first responding officer placed the husband into custody after arriving on the crime scene. The officer questioned the man about what happened. The man confesses to the officer at the scene that he had killed his wife because she had caught him cheating, and she was going to divorce him.
During your pre-trial preparation, you have a meeting with the officer. He tells you that he did not advise the husband of his Miranda Rights after taking him into custody, but before asking him questions. As an experienced prosecutor, you know that this might be an issue during the trial. You know of some legal loopholes that might allow you to get the confession entered into evidence, but only if the officer tells the truth that he did not read the Miranda Rights. During the trial, the defense attorney cross-examines the officer and asks, "Officer, did you read my client the Miranda Warnings before you interrogated him?"
There is NO video or other evidence to support or contradict whether the officer read the Miranda Warnings or not. The officer testifies that yes, he did read the Miranda Warnings. You know that the officer is lying on the witness stand. If you say something, you know that the confession will be thrown out, and the entire case will be tainted. You know that most likely that the defendant will be found not guilty and set free. If you say nothing, then the man will be convicted and sent to prison for the brutal murder. Ethically, what should you do?
Answers
As an experienced prosecutor, it is important to follow ethical rules. Ethically, it would be appropriate to inform the court of the officer's lie regarding the reading of the Miranda Warnings.
Here are some reasons to support this ethical decision:
If the officer lied, it would indicate that the confession was not voluntary because the defendant was not warned about his right to remain silent.The court would be more likely to dismiss the case if it became aware that an officer had lied under oath about Miranda Warnings.
In court, the prosecutor's primary duty is to seek justice, not to obtain convictions at all costs.There is no ethical dilemma since there is only one correct answer. The prosecutor must disclose the officer's testimony and allow the court to determine the credibility of the officer's testimony regarding Miranda Warnings.
To know more about ethical visit
https://brainly.com/question/30090411
#SPJ11
Maddie wants to offer a small, positive, and impactful gesture to her recent job interviewer that might help set her apart from the competition. what would be an appropriate follow-up gesture?
a.
send a handwritten thank-you note.
b.
ask to take the interviewer out to dinner.
c.
buy the interviewer a gift.
d.
send a singing telegram.
Answers
a. sending a handwritten thank-you note would be an appropriate follow-up gesture.
A gesture is a form nonverbal communication ornon-vocal communication in which visible fleshly conduct communicate particular dispatches, either in place of, or in confluence with, speech. Gestures include movement of the hands, face, or another corridor of the body. When you relate, you make broad and agitated movements with your hands when speaking. Someone describing a scary auto accident might relate hectically. The verb gesticulate is related to the noun gesture.
The gesture has stress on the first syllable, and relate has stress on the alternate syllable.
Learn more about gesture here: https://brainly.com/question/27031953
#SPJ4
examples of writ of prohibition
Answers
The basis upon which the writ is commonly issued is:
Want, or excess, of jurisdiction.
Breach of natural justice.
1. John offers Tk. 5,000 to anyone who will remove
rubbish and clean his garden. The following people comply with the terms of
this offer:
(a) His wife, Gen;
(b) His ex-wife, Flora;
(c) His colleague, Sam
(d) His son, 9 years old, William;
(e) His next-door neighbor, Billy-a lunatic.
Advise John whether or not, in these circumstances, any legally
enforceable contracts have been concluded.
Answers
Answer:
In these circumstances, it is unlikely that legally enforceable contracts have been concluded with everyone who has complied with John's offer.
(a) John's wife Gen is considered a household member, and thus cannot enter into a contract with her husband.
(b) John's ex-wife Flora, however, can enter into a contract with John.
(c) John's colleague Sam can also enter into a contract with John as they have a professional relationship.
(d) John's son William is a minor, and as per the contract law, a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
(e) John's next-door neighbor Billy is a lunatic, and as per the contract law, a person of unsound mind cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
In conclusion, only John's ex-wife Flora and his colleague Sam have entered into legally enforceable contracts with John for the removal of rubbish and cleaning of his garden.
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Answers
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
If you were a prosecuting attorney, and you KNEW FOR FACT that the defendant had committed a crime, would you commit misconduct if it looked as if the defendant would be acquitted? Explain why. Does the level of crime or crime type matter in your answer? Why or why not?
Answers
As the prosecuting attorney, your role is to defend the defendant in regards to the case and even if they had committed a crime, you have to make sure that they are not proven guilty or they are acquitted.
To some extent, the level of crime or crime type matter because some prosecuting attorney will let their clients go if it a petty crime but when it is a crime such as murder, misappropriation of funds, they may never compromise.
What is this case about?If you known that it is a huge crime and your conscience cannot allow you to let the man go so that he will not do it again, you can tell the opposition lawyer anonymously but this may jeopardize your law career if caught.
The right thing to do is to step down from been the prosecuting attorney and then you can be free from that guilt of betrayal to yourself and to the defendant and then one can properly submit the evidence to the opposition lawyer.
Learn more about prosecuting attorney from
https://brainly.com/question/11589445
#SPJ1
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
Answers
an alcohol server unlawfully serves a minor alcohol, who then injures himself. can the alcohol server be sued for damages suffered by the minor?
Answers
In many jurisdictions, an alcohol server can be held liable for damages suffered by a minor who was unlawfully served alcohol.
This is because the server had a duty to exercise reasonable care and not serve alcohol to someone who was underage, and their failure to do so resulted in harm to the minor. Liability for damages may be based on the legal theory of negligence, which requires proof of a duty owed, a breach of that duty, causation, and damages. If the minor can prove that the alcohol server breached their duty of care by serving alcohol to them when they knew or should have known that the minor was underage, and that this breach caused their injuries, they may be able to recover damages from the server. However, the specific laws and legal standards governing liability for alcohol-related injuries vary by jurisdiction, so it is important to consult with a qualified attorney for guidance in a particular case.
Learn more about jurisdiction :
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
An implied contract may result from statements found in employee handbooks or other employment documants.
A. True
B. False
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A contract is a signed agreement between an employer and an employee stating various ground rules as terms of employment. This is a signed and official documentation that holds both parties in an agreement.
An implied contract, on the other hand, is not a written or verbally spoken contract but is based on the actions of the parties involved. It is still legally binding and is a form of agreement between the concerned parties. And so, it can also be a result of any statements found in an employee's handbook or other employment documents.
Thus, the answer is true.
Mawby and Walklate looked at victimology as a social phenomenon. They broke victimology into three strains. Review these strains and discuss which strain you believe in the most and why.
Answers
Victimology was examined by Mawby and Walklate as a social phenomena. Positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology are some of the three subtypes that they fall under. The majority of the time, support positive victimology.
What is victimology?
The term "victimology" is the study of crime victims. The field of victimology critically examines and perpetrator of the crime.
There are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology. They believe in most of the time as positive victimology because they contributed in socio-culture and dominant individual thy focuses tends to be interpersonal crime.
As a result, there are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology.
Learn more about on victimology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27625447
#SPJ1
Describe four of the factors which may have been relevant to the public interest part of the Full Code test in Sally Challen’s case.
Answers
According to the Full Code Test, the four factors that were relevant to the public interest in the case of Sally Challen are as follows:
1. Seriosity of the Offence: Sally was found culpable in the murder of her abusive husband, Richard Sally. The murder shows a commitment of serious harm to Richard's life and endangered public safety if it remained unchecked. Sometimes, the abused becomes the abuser.
2. Culpability Level: Sally was adjudged culpable in the murder of Richard, having been directly involved in the act. She premeditated and planned the murder. But there was no history of any previous convictions in her case.
3. Circumstance and Harm: The circumstance in which Sally killed her husband was not considered in her conviction. Sally had suffered unabated abuses in the hands of her husband for many decades. According to her, the husband made her behave abnormally.
4. Societal Impact: The murder was bound to influence other women to give similar treatments to their abusive husbands if not checked by the court conviction. In the same way, the overturning of her earlier conviction from murder to manslaughter influenced victims of abusive husbands to seek redress. Every unlawful use of force against a person attracts public interest.
Interestingly, Sally Challen's conviction for murder was eventually commuted to manslaughter after her appeal, which determined that Richard Challen must have subjected Sally to coercive control.
According to Professor Evan Stark, coercive control involves the erosion of a person's self-esteem through constant humiliation, intimidation, punishment, and other abusive assertions of power. The aim of coercive control is to isolate the victim and make dependent on the perpetrator. A victim of coercive control is often deprived of basic needs while their daily routine is subject to total control.
Thus, according to the Full Code Test, after passing the evidential stage, prosecutors must subject the case to the public interest stage before determining whether or not to proceed with the prosecution.
Related question: https://brainly.com/question/25644506
Which federal agency is primarily responsible for protecting consumers' markets against computer-generated fraud?
Answers
Answer:
INFOSEC
Which federal agency ids primarily responsible for protecting consumers against computer-generated commercial fraud? The DOJ operates the National INFOSEC Education and Training Program.
when a party is fraudulently induced into a contract, that party can select .
Answers
When a party is fraudulently induced into a contract, that party can either seek damages or terminate the contract.
About Contract
A legally binding agreement between two or more parties known as a contract establishes, clarifies, and regulates the parties' respective rights and duties. The transfer of commodities, services, income, or a promise to transfer all of those at a later time are common components of contracts. The damaged party may seek legal remedies like damages or rescission in the case of a contract violation. Agreements must be kept, which is the foundation of contract law, a branch of law of obligations that deals with contracts. Like other aspects of private law, contract law differs from country to jurisdiction.
To know more about contract:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
Is it possible to
have an impartial jury with the attention media pays to important/large cases?
Answers
Which of the following is NOT an effect of alcohol?
A. Poor judgement
B. Decreased muscle coordination
C. Resistance to physical injury
D. Short-term memory loss
Answers
What is a "pocket part?"
Answers
Answer:
A pocket part (formally titled as a supplement) is a special document located inside the back cover of certain hardcover legal reference books.
Explanation: I hope i helped Brainliest?
XYZ cable channel ran a story about an E. Coli outbreak in a national chain of restaurants serving Mexican cuisine. They showed a video of a local Mexican eatery not part of that national chain. What tort was committed by the cable company? O A. Appropriation B. Public disclosure of private information O C. False light D. Intrusion of solitude
Answers
The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option C)
The false light is:
A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.
They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.
This right must be in balance with freedom of expression.
According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.
Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is C. False light.
1. Mr. Rodrigo alyas Digong was held fragrante delicto for taking cartons of Sardines can goods, accused argued that he should only be convicted of frustrated theft for taking can goods from the supermarket since he was immediately apprehended by the security guard. Is the contention of Digong correct? What crime did he committed? Explain why? ( 10 Points)
2. Tiborcio fired at Kurdapyo’s room, although in reality, the latter was not present in his room; thus, Tiborcio failed to kill him. If inherent impossibility of accomplishing the crime. What factual crime does committed by Tiborcio? Explain. ( 10 points )
3. Patrolman Gunggong dropped a hand grenade inside a house, killing Pikoy instantly and causing Butog, Pokang, Dagul & Mokong to suffer shrapnel wounds on their bodies. What crime committed by Patrolman Gunggong for the grave negligence and mistake he committed? ( 10 Points )
Answers
In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.
What crime did Digong commit and why?The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.
In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.
Read more about sales contract
brainly.com/question/28326714
#SPJ1
Con la evolución del derecho romano y con la expedición del cerebro edicto de Antonio caracalla, se extinguió la clasificación del hombres libres y esclavos, en pro de fortalecer el imperio, el fisco, ¿esto es falso o verdadero?
Answers
Answer: Verdadero
Explanation:
En el año 338 a.C., el Emperador Caracalla pone fin a la institución de la esclavitud, eliminando la distinción entre hombres libres y esclavos. Este evento no solo aporta una mayor fuerza integradora al creciente imperio, sino que además permite una mayor recaudación de fondos a través de los impuestos que los esclavos liberados deben comenzar a pagar, y que genera un beneficio fiscal para el emperador.
Antes de eso, la esclavitud había sido una institución naturalizada en el Imperio Romano, existiendo personas que nacían como esclavos, y otras que obtenían esa condición por definiciones del derecho positivo de la época.
When President Obama assists fellow Democrats in their election campaigns by endorsing them and making speeches on their behalf he plays the role of
Chief Executor
Chief of Party
Chief Legislator
Chief of State
Answers
Answer:
I believe it is the Chief of Party.
Explanation:
which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity that the form is out of date with respect to current law?
Answers
A will that specifies an executor or an exception has a significant risk of being declared invalid since the form is no longer lawful under the law. Option (d) is Correct.
The person in charge of running the operations of a decedent's probate estate is known as the executor (for men) or executrix (for women). The chosen word is the same as the personal representative. It can be a smart idea to name a family member as executor if you believe they can handle the responsibility. Examples include naming a grandchild who is an adult, a niece or nephew, or one of your offspring.
A woman who has been charged with carrying out a final will and testament's instructions is known as an executrix. Both an executrix and an executor are accountable for the same things. The executor's primary responsibility is to follow out the deceased's instructions for managing their affairs and wishes. If there was no prior appointment, the executor is chosen either by the testator—the person who creates the will—or by the court.
Learn more about law visit: brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity and may not reflect the provisions of current law?
A. marital share
B. statutory
C. formal
D. exemption trust
E. living
PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE FOLLOW AND BRAINLIEST
Answers
1: Congress has two legislative bodies or chambers: the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. Anyone elected to either body can propose a new law.
2:Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill
3: If the majority of the committee members vote favorably for the bill, it is advanced to the Senate floor, where every Senator has an opportunity to review and debate the legislation. After being voted upon favorably by a committee, the bill is referred to the full Senate for a vote.
4: a majority of 51 out of 100 is required.
5: After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President.
6: When a bill reaches the President, he has three choices. He can: Sign and pass the bill—the bill becomes a law. Refuse to sign, or veto, the bill
7: The veto allows the President to “check” the legislature by reviewing acts passed by Congress and blocking measures he finds unconstitutional, unjust, or unwise.
hope this helps :)
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
Answers
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
Answers
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
Answers
what is 2 + 5,940,714
Answers
Answer:
5,940,716
Explanation:
that is what it is
Answer:
5940716
Explanation:
I NEED HELP!
What is the function of primaries and caucuses?
1) to get out in the field and discuss the issues of the day with the voting public
2) to choose the running mate of the front runner, or the person who will run for president
3)to introduce to the voters the front runners whom the party will choose during the convention
4) to give voters a chance to vote on the candidate they would like to represent the party
Answers
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is 3; to introduce to the voters the front runners whom the party will choose during the convention
mention and clearly explain four essential ingredients for the existence of a contract
Answers
Answer:
For a contract to be legally binding it must contain four essential elements:
an offer
an acceptance
an intention to create a legal relationship
a consideration (usually money).
However it may still be considered invalid if it:
entices someone to commit a crime, or is illegal
is entered into by someone that lacks capacity, such as a minor or bankrupt
was agreed through misleading or deceptive conduct, duress, unconscionable conduct or undue influence.
why is Uhuru Kenyatta in pandora papers
Answers
Answer:
The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.
Explanation:
How could the legal issues associated with using tobacco products affect your future?.
Answers
The legal issues associated with using tobacco products affect your future as the tobacco industry contends that because their trademarks cannot be used due to plain packaging, their reputation will suffer and they will no longer be entitled to the safeguards that were previously provided by national law.
According to the tobacco business, plain packaging infringes upon its trademark rights in a manner that is contrary to both domestic and international intellectual property rules and duties. Most of its arguments rest in some manner on the claim that trademark owners have a positive right to use their registered trademarks and that plain packaging inhibits them from doing so.
As per the tobacco industry, limiting or regulating the use of trademarks on tobacco product packaging through plain packaging legislation has the effect of "appropriating" their property rights and it clearly affects future life.
Learn to know more about Tobacco on
https://brainly.com/question/28549462
#SPJ4