How did the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influence his ruling in the mcculloch case?.

The legislative branch of the federal government, Congress, is responsible for passing laws across the country.

When does federal law take precedence over state law? Pick two options for the answer?

When two laws conflict, when Congress officially or tacitly declares that one law supersedes the other, or when federal laws are so ubiquitous that they encompass the entire legal landscape, federal law preempts state law.

Which division of the government drafts statutes?

Every branch of government makes a particular kind of law. The legislative branch creates statutory law, which lays forth the public policy objectives that the elected legislators desire to achieve. Statutes frequently offer broad guidelines for how the executive branch should carry out statutory laws (public policy).

To learn more about federal law from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/25912245

#SPJ4

Crossover youth are young people who are involved with both the juvenile justice and dependency courts simultaneously. These youth are often referred to as dually adjudicated youth. This term is used to describe youth who have both delinquency and dependency issues that require attention and services from both systems.

The juvenile justice system focuses on young people who have been accused of committing a crime, while the dependency court deals with issues related to abuse, neglect, and dependency.
Dually adjudicated youth require specialized attention and care because they often have complex and interconnected needs that require coordinated efforts from both courts. This population requires a tailored approach that addresses both their delinquency and dependency issues to ensure they receive the services and support they need to overcome the challenges they face.
To address the needs of these youth, many jurisdictions have implemented cross-system collaboration programs. These programs aim to enhance the coordination of services and improve outcomes for dually adjudicated youth. By working together, the juvenile justice and dependency courts can help these youth overcome their challenges and lead successful, healthy lives.

To know more about jurisdictions, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

Answer:

MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.

The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant

The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.

The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.

For such more question on lawsuit:

https://brainly.com/question/30707234

#SPJ11

Answer:

The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.

Hope this helps :) <3

Answer:james madison

Explanation:The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.

Continuous assessment is the responsibility of all individuals involved in an operation and is critical to ensuring its success.

The operation assessment tenet that is the responsibility of commanders, planners, and operators at every level is continuous assessment. According to Joint Publication 5-0, Chapter VI, VI-8, continuous assessment is the process of monitoring the operation's progress toward achieving objectives, assessing its effectiveness, and recommending changes to enhance its performance.

Continuous assessment is a critical component of the military planning process, and it is the responsibility of all individuals involved in the operation to continuously monitor and assess the operation's progress toward achieving its objectives.

This means that commanders, planners, and operators must be actively involved in the assessment process and not rely solely on individual advisors, committees, or assessment entities. The continuous assessment ensures that the operation remains on track and that adjustments can be made as necessary to achieve success.

To learn more about continuous assessment

https://brainly.com/question/31454147

#SPJ4

The purpose of appointing a conservator is to protect business interests after you die. Thus, option D is correct.

A conservatory, often known as the conservatee, is a person who is designated by a court to handle the money matters and/or intimate matters of another person.

The appointment of a conservator is made with the intent of safeguarding and managing the assets and/or personal welfare of the conservatee, who may not be capable of doing so owing to physical or mental incapacity, developmental impairment, or other factors.

A conservator, who is frequently appointed by a court, is in charge of looking after the person's finances and managing their assets. Depending on the requirements of the individual and the details of the conservatorship order, the particular duties of a conservator may change. Therefore, it can be concluded that option D is correct.

Read more about conservators here:

brainly.com/question/29220242

#SPJ5

When Jack raises his eyebrows at a comment made by Carol, he is engaging in nonverbal communication.

Nonverbal communication refers to any form of communication that does not involve the use of words or language. Facial expressions, body language, tone of voice, and gestures are all examples of nonverbal communication. In this case, Jack's raised eyebrows are a nonverbal cue that suggest surprise, disbelief, or skepticism. By raising his eyebrows, Jack is conveying a message to Carol that he may not agree with what she said or that he finds it unexpected.

Nonverbal communication can be just as powerful as verbal communication and can often convey more information than words alone. Understanding nonverbal cues is an important aspect of effective communication, as it can help us better interpret and respond to the messages being conveyed.

Learn more about Nonverbal communication here: https://brainly.com/question/5428379

#SPJ11

Answer:

The researcher could call it qualitative research.

Explanation:

Qualitative research is one that promotes the investigation of data that do not have a mathematical basis, that is, it does not present numerical data, but seeks to investigate issues, opinions, events and characteristics of something or someone. The research shown in the question above is an example of this, as it seeks to investigate and analyze the contradictions surrounding Benedict Arnold and his role during the American Revolution.

Answer:

The Bankruptcy Code is found in which title of the United States code?

-Title 11

Title 11 of the United States Code.

Title 11, also known as the United States Bankruptcy Code, is the main source of bankruptcy law in the United States.

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

the 2 types are Visual and Manual drivers

Answer:

There are three main types of distraction:

Explanation:

Hope it helps^^

Answer:

In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.

Explanation:

Significantly, a person holding a state-issued permit allowing the person to acquire or possess firearms (e.g., a concealed weapons permit) is not required to undergo a background check if the permit was issued: (1) within the previous five years in the state in which the transfer is to take place; and (2) after an authorized government official has conducted a background investigation to verify that possession of a firearm would not be unlawful.13 Permits issued after November 30, 1998 qualify as exempt only if the approval process included a NICS check.14

It is illegal to follow an emergency vehicle at a distance closer than a specified distance.

The specific distance at which it is illegal to follow an emergency vehicle varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific traffic laws in place. In general, drivers are required to maintain a safe and reasonable distance from emergency vehicles to ensure the safety of both the emergency responders and other road users.

The purpose of maintaining a safe distance from emergency vehicles is to allow them to maneuver safely and respond to emergencies without obstruction. Following too closely to an emergency vehicle can impede their progress and increase the risk of accidents or delays in reaching their destination.

To determine the exact distance required by law, it is important to refer to the traffic regulations specific to your jurisdiction. These regulations often outline the minimum safe distance to maintain behind emergency vehicles, such as fire trucks, ambulances, or police cars, when their emergency lights and sirens are activated.

In summary, it is generally illegal to follow an emergency vehicle at a distance closer than the specified distance mandated by traffic laws. The purpose of this regulation is to ensure the safety and effectiveness of emergency responses on the road.

To learn more about emergency Click Here: brainly.com/question/13004123

#SPJ11

False. Judicial review by judges should not be used except in unusual cases is an inaccurate statement. Judicial review is a fundamental part of the legal system, and it is an important check against governmental excesses.

Judicial review allows the courts to assess the validity of legislative and executive actions. It also ensures that laws are interpreted and applied in accordance with the constitution.

The courts use judicial review to ensure that governmental bodies do not exceed their constitutionally prescribed powers. The courts may also review the actions of governmental bodies to ensure that they are consistent with constitutional rights and freedoms. This means that judicial review is not only used in unusual cases, but also in cases where the government has acted unlawfully or where it has failed to respect the rights of citizens. Therefore, judicial review should be used whenever necessary to protect citizens’ rights and ensure the rule of law.

Know more about  Judicial review here

https://brainly.com/question/28179489#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Terms in this set (4) Griswold, a director of a planned parenthood league was arrested and fined $100 for breaking a connecticut law, which stated that using or giving advice on the use of contraceptives was illegal.

1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.

2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.

The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.

These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.

Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.

Learn more about fundamental rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/1261546

In a civil action, the plaintiff submits the first pleading, which includes the accusations against the defendant is called petition or the complaint.

This document typically describes the grievance, complaint, or claim the plaintiff thinks they have against the respondent. This pleading usually contains the complaint itself as well as a demand for judgment against the defendant that specifies the plaintiff's desired results from the defendant. After receiving the summons, the defendant may submit replies, which are written responses to the petition or other documents that ask for information or responses. Replies, cross claims, and counterclaims are some further typical filings.

To learn more about plaintiff

https://brainly.com/question/16079432

#SPJ4

The Canadian Experience Class (CEC) is a popular immigration program designed for foreign nationals who have already gained skilled work experience in Canada.

Individuals must have at least one year of skilled work experience in Canada in the last three years and meet additional criteria, such as language proficiency and education requirements, to be eligible for the CEC. They must also be able to demonstrate that their professional experience has benefited the Canadian economy and society.

One of the primary advantages of the CEC programme is that it gives preference to applicants who are currently in Canada and have a solid link to the Canadian job market. Those who have already established themselves in Canada through job or study may find it easier to transfer to permanent status as a result of this.

For such more question on foreign:

https://brainly.com/question/30104981

#SPJ4

Answer:

v

Explanation:

h

Answer: B

Explanation: Active analysis is more effective than passive monitoring because it is proactive and allows you to identify problems before they occur. Passive monitoring is reactive and requires time to detect issues.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.

While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.

So, I go with A

Answer:

B

Explanation:

All the other options pertain to criminal cases. A civil case cannot result in punishment.

TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are  Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.

Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.

Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.

It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.

Learn more about  tax loopholes

https://brainly.com/question/7227568

#SPJ11

In the past, there have only been a few occasions for attorneys to turn down possible jurors without having to provide a justification. These are referred to as strikes or challenges.

Challenges in the context of jury selection relate to the right of attorneys to exclude a certain number of prospective jurors without providing a justification. Peremptory challenges and challenges for cause are the two basic categories of challenges. There are a finite number of peremptory challenges that can be used to remove a juror for any cause other than discrimination. On the other hand, challenges for cause are filed when a lawyer thinks that a potential juror is unsuited to serve because of a particular prejudice, links to the parties, or other disqualifying element. The use of challenges is a crucial step in the jury selection process and has a big effect on how a trial turns out.

Learn more about challenges.here:

https://brainly.com/question/28344921

#SPJ4

Agreements which are one-sided, or heavy-handed against one party, that courts will not make the harmed, innocent person fulfill his or her contractual duties are unconscionable agreements/contracts.

Unconscionable contracts are those that are so blatantly biased against one party and unfair to the other that the law deems them to be unenforceable. In terms of contract law, an unconscionable contract is one which gives either of the parties no real, huge range. This is usually the result of major disparities in the parties' relative bargaining positions. Unconscionable contracts frequently entail one of the parties signing under pressure, with imperfect data, or after being deceived, which is one of their main characteristics.

A contract will normally be deemed unenforceable if a lawsuit is brought and the court decides that it is unconscionable.

Learn more about unconscionable contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/14426554

#SPJ4

White collar crime, often committed by corporate or government officials, primarily involves crimes committed for financial gain. The two types of white collar crimes from the options provided are b. embezzlement and c. mail and wire fraud.

Embezzlement is a form of white collar crime that occurs when an individual entrusted with managing or controlling another person's money or property fraudulently takes it for their own personal gain. In this type of crime, the offender usually has legal access to the funds or property but uses them in an unauthorized manner.

To explain further, let's consider an example: A company's financial officer might divert some of the organization's funds into their personal account without the company's knowledge or permission.

Mail and wire fraud is another form of white collar crime that involves using mail, telephone, or electronic communication (such as email or text messages) to deceive someone for financial gain. This crime can take various forms, including scams, fraudulent solicitations, or misrepresentations.

For instance, a person may send emails claiming to be a representative of a well-known company, asking the recipient to provide personal information or send money under false pretenses.

In summary, white collar crimes like embezzlement and mail and wire fraud are typically committed by corporate or government officials for financial gain. Embezzlement involves the unauthorized use of funds or property by someone in a position of trust, while mail and wire fraud involve deceptive communication to obtain money or property fraudulently.

To know more about white collar crimes refer here: https://brainly.com/question/15691073#
#SPJ11