Answers
Federalists like a strong central government. This ruling strengthened the central government. He wanted more power in the federal government the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influenced his ruling in the McCulloch case.
The State of Maryland has made one of its most important decisions regarding the expansion of federal authority to Secretary John Marshall. The case concerned Congress' power to establish banks and raised the broader issue of the separation of powers between state and federal governments.
McCulloch's case went to the Supreme Court. As a sovereign state, Maryland claimed it had the power to tax any business within its borders. McCulloch's attorneys argued that a national bank was "necessary and appropriate" for Congress to exercise its enumerated powers.
Learn more about McCulloch's case at
https://brainly.com/question/12575161
#SPJ4
Related Questions
disgusting between ethics, Law and positive morality
Answers
Answer:
ethics is something similar to your culture
like you way of life.
law are rules and regulations that govern a certain state
in which citizen must obey.
positive morals are those behaviour that an individual will exhibit that will bring him honour and respect.
Step-by-step Explanation:
A warrant is required when arresting a juvenile for a criminal act? True or False
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let’s say this.
A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.
So your answer wouldv’e been false.
If a juvenile commits a crime, a police officer or deputy can arrest them with or without a warrant. A warrant can be issued but is not required. Say, a 16 year old robs a store and flees, the cameras show what happened and what the 16 year old looks like. So pictures can be used to identify the juvenile. Miranda rights also have to be read to juveniles because just like an adult, they can refuse to speak.
in american government’s federal framework, sovereignty (that is, supreme and independent political authority) is
Answers
In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.
In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.
The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.
Learn more about federal structure at:
brainly.com/question/31417366
#SPJ4
What are the differences between public law and private law
Answers
Answer:
the difference between public and private law is that private law governs relationships among citizens, and public law governs the relationship between individuals and the state.
Explanation:
In Colleges In Tennessee,New York,Florida,Illinois,Massachusetts Doesn't College Freshmen For Class Of 2028 For College Sleep In The Same Grade Dorm?
Answers
Different colleges and universities have different ways of assigning dorm rooms. Most colleges put new students in the same dorms or buildings, but each college might do things differently.
What is the FreshmenIt is necessary to consult the specific policies of the colleges in Tennessee, New York, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts to determine their dormitory assignment practices for freshmen in the Class of 2028.
Most colleges want freshmen to live together in specific dorms. We do this to help new students make friends, adjust to school, and feel like they fit in. Some places are only for first-year college students, like certain dorms, residence halls, or floors.
Read more about Freshmen here:
https://brainly.com/question/23100651
#SPJ1
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
In a 1973 book, historian Arthur Schlesinger analyzed whether the president of the United States has become overly powerful and was no longer subject to constitutional checks and balances. Schlesinger made his argument following the Watergate scandal stating, “The expansion and abuse of presidential power constitute the underlying issue, the issue that Watergate has raised to the surface, dramatized, and made politically accessible.” Take a position on whether or not Schlesinger’s argument that the presidency has become too powerful is true today. In your essay,
Articulate a claim or thesis that addresses the issue raised by Schlesinger, and use a line of reasoning to defend it.
Use at least TWO pieces of relevant and accurate evidence to support your claim or thesis.
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the foundational documents listed below:
Constitution of the United States
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 70
Brutus No. 1
Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document listed above or from your study of the American presidency.
Use reasoning to explain why the evidence you provided supports your claim or thesis.
Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing or alternative perspective.
Answers
Answer:
“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington
Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.
During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.
You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
Enter the subject you want to present.Show your argument, that is, your opinion on this subject.Present evidence, taken from the documents and articles you have read, that proves that your argument is correct and true.Show an argument contrary to yours.Present evidence, which proves that this argument is incorrect.Finish the text by reinforcing your argument.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults
Among the factors that influence delinquency rate trends, which is false?
a. The general crime rate follows the proportion of young males in the population.
b. As the number of gun-carrying (toting seems too informal) students increases, so does the seriousness of violent delinquency.
c. As the level of social problems increases, such as unwed mothers and racial conflict, so do delinquency rates.
d. There is strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant
population.
Answers
The false statement among the given options is there is a strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant population.
The option (D) is correct.
Research has shown that there is generally no strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant population. Studies have consistently found that immigrants, including first-generation immigrants and their children, tend to have lower rates of crime and delinquency compared to the native-born population.
This phenomenon is often referred to as the "immigrant paradox." While there may be specific cases or contexts where certain immigrant groups exhibit higher delinquency rates, as a general trend, there are areas of strength no between misconduct rates and the immigrant populace.
Learn more about delinquency:
https://brainly.com/question/14502794
#SPJ4
What does Wilson fear is happening in American communities?
Answers
He claimed to have exhausted all peaceful options and feared that during a war, Americans would abandon tolerance and freedom. Wilson expressed his continued concern that a military victory would eventually turn out to be hollow in language that echoed his remarks before the Senate.
American politician and professor Thomas Woodrow Wilson presided over the country as the 28th president from 1913 to 1921. Before winning the 1912 presidential election, Wilson, a Democrat, held the offices of governor of New Jersey and president of Princeton University.
Wilson served as the president of the United States during World War I and afterwards founded and was a key proponent of the League of Nations, for which he was given the 1919 Nobel Prize for Peace. The Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, granting women the right to vote, was passed and ratified during his second term.
To know more about Wilson here
https://brainly.com/question/4112868
#SPJ4
8. As a minor, you risk what penalty if you pass a stopped school bus?
A. O Jeering from the school kids
B. O A high speed chase
C. O License suspension
D. O Other
Answers
Answer:
C.
The others make no sense.
What does a plaintiff need to file if they want the defendant to stop performing an action?
Answers
Answer:
If you were wronged, you have the right to sue. But, there are things you have to know before you sue, like:
Who to sue,
Where they are,
What you need to do before you sue them,
Where you should sue them, and
If you should sue them.
These are hard questions to answer, even in an easy case like a slip-and-fall in a store. For example, if you slip on the floor in a supermarket, you have to figure out if the store is part of a chain or just one store, if falling was partly or totally your fault, etc.
In a complicated case, like if the same slip and fall happened on land that the county owns, but that a government agency rents, you have to figure out who was responsible for slippery ground, and follow the laws for suing the government. If you sue a government agency, you have to follow the laws for notice. This is a fancy way of saying that before you sue a government agency you have to fill out papers that say that you’re suing them.
There’s a time limit to give notice. After you file your notice, you don’t have much time to file your lawsuit. Claim limits like this protect hospitals and other businesses. If you do not follow these rules, get ready to fight. If you don’t do things on time, you may lose your right to sue. You could ruin your lawsuit.
Even more important are time limits called "statute of limitations." These statutes, or laws, say when you can file your action. If you don’t file on time, you lose automatically. For example, if you are in a car crash, you have 2 years to file a lawsuit. This might not be true for your case. You have to check the time limit yourself. But in general this is the case. If you wait one day after the time limit, the Court won’t let you sue, except in very special circumstances.
This means that even if you have a good case, you lose because you didn’t file on time. The person you sue can challenge you at any time. They can appeal and win. That’s because the statute of limitations says if the Court can hear and decide the case at all. If you wait too long, you take away the Court’s jurisdiction to hear your case.
What are Summons and Complaint:
A general civil lawsuit starts when the plaintiff files 2 forms.
A Summons is a notice that says there’s a lawsuit.
A Complaint is a form that says how the person was hurt, who hurt them and how much the damages are.
Where do I file my lawsuit?
There are a lot of things to think when you decide where to file your complaint. For example:
Jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction can mean more than one thing. The Court has to have “jurisdiction” over the defendant. This means that the Court has the right to hear and decide a case for the person you are suing. In general, you have to file your lawsuit where the injury happened, or where the contract was supposed to happen, or where the defendant lives.
There can be other requirements. Check the California Code of Civil Procedure .
Then, the Court also has to have jurisdiction over how much money you want. You have to file your lawsuit in the right court:
Small Claims Court,
Limited Jurisdiction Superior Court, or
Unlimited Jurisdiction Superior Court.
Venue:
Jurisdiction says in what State and what Court you file your lawsuit. Venue is the County where you file your action. Usually, this is the County where the defendant lives or where the injury happened. But, sometimes you can change the Venue. See Law and Motion.
Court locations/hours/maps:
See the list of courthouses. Click on each court to see the hours and maps.
Unlimited Jurisdiction cases:
If you have a case worth more than $25,000, you have an unlimited jurisdiction case. For these cases, you have to give the Clerk:
The Complaint, or petition,
A Civil Case Cover Sheet ,
The filing fee (see the local fee schedule ), and
An original copy of the Summons.
The Clerk will endorse the Complaint, the Cover Sheet and the Summons, and give them back to you with something called a “Civil Lawsuit Notice”. This tells the date and time of your first Court hearing, and which Department (courthouse and courtroom) and Judge your case is assigned to.
You’ll also get an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Information
Explanation:
How can citizens get a law passed without the state legislature's help?
Answers
Answer:
Below:-
Explanation:
Citizens can not passed a bill without the legislature's help!!! due to this sentence:-
"Ultimately, a law can only be passed if both the Senate and the House of Representatives introduce, debate, and vote on similar pieces of legislation."
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
Answers
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a way in which the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and its policies affect banks?
a.
The Fed sets a maximum on the interest rates banks can charge for loans or credit.
b.
The Fed’s required reserve policy limits how much money banks can lend out.
c.
The Fed determines at what price banks must lend money to one another.
d.
The Fed serves as “the bank’s bank,” lending other banks money when necessary.
Answers
The Federal Reserve do not sets a maximum on the interest rates banks can charge for loans or credit.
Thus, the correct option is A.
What is the Federal Reserve?The Federal Reserve Board is dedicated to encouraging responsible innovation in the financial technology sector, both inside the companies we directly supervise and more generally.
The Federal Reserve examines the effects on the whole financial system of each financial institution's safety and soundness.
The Federal Reserve System is governed by the Board of Governors, which is based in Washington, D.C. It is governed by seven individuals, known as "governors," who are appointed by the American president and approved in their roles by the American senate.
Learn more about Federal Reserve, here
https://brainly.com/question/17097530
#SPJ6
a record in writing of the entire trial proceedings including the testimony of all the witnesses and any discussions between the judge and the attorneys that must be prepared and forwarded to the appeals court is called a
Answers
A record in writing of the entire trial proceedings, including the testimony of all the witnesses and any discussions between the judge and the attorneys, that must be prepared and forwarded to the appeals court is called a "transcript."
A transcript is a set-up account of the whole preliminary investigation, including all the declarations of the observers and any conversations between the judge and the lawyers. It is ready and sent to the requests court to audit the preliminary court's choice.
The requests court depends on the transcript to assess the legitimate issues raised on a claim, including whether the preliminary court applied the law accurately and whether there were any mistakes made during the preliminary that require inversion or alteration of the judgment. A transcript is a significant record of the preliminary procedures, and it is vital to guarantee that it precisely reflects what occurred in the preliminary court.
Learn more about preliminary investigation:
https://brainly.com/question/31449385
#SPJ4
Explain three benefits of investigative radio or television programmes and show how these benefits contribute to the role that the media plays in our democracy
Answers
The investigative shows are a part of the media roles in making democratic society transparent by spreading information.
What is Democracy?Democracy can be defined as a form a government in which the majority of power and decision emanates from the masses or the people.
In a democratic society, the masses decides who will be in power by election.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
which of the following rights is guaranteed by the fifth amendment? a. be heard by an impartial jury. b. be represented by legal counsel. c. receive a speedy and public trial. d. requires the state to apply due process of law.
Answers
The correct answer is D. Rights are guaranteed by the fifth amendment requires the state to apply due process of law.
An amendment is a formal change or addition made to a legal document, such as a constitution, law, or treaty. It is a way to modify or update the existing content of the document without requiring a complete overhaul. Amendments play a vital role in democratic societies by allowing for the adaptation of laws to meet evolving needs, address shortcomings, or correct any injustices.
The process of amending a document usually involves a specific set of procedures outlined in the original document itself or in a separate amendment process. These procedures typically require a designated authority, such as a legislative body or a special committee, to propose, debate, and ultimately approve the amendment. Once approved, an amendment becomes an integral part of the original document, carrying the same legal weight as the original text.
To know more about Amendment refer to-
brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ4
Which theory (deprivation or importation) best explains the sub Rosa economy?
Answers
Answer:
I believe it is "deprivation"
Explanation:
I dont know much about law so I researched it and believe this is the best result.
IF ITS WRONG SORRY.
You are walking down a street and pass by a beer brewery. A barrel rolls out of a third story window and injures you. You have no idea how this occurred, and you will have difficulty providing that the brewery was at fault. What legal theory will you best if you sue the brewery?
a. Res ipsa loquitur
b. Strict liability
c. Negligence per se
d. Battery
Answers
Answer:
B) strict liability ( I think )
Explanation:
Hope that helped! :)
Attorney Sarah Robinson represents a woman named Taylor Jackson as a plaintiff in a car accident case. The defense has made an offer to settle the case, but Sarah leaves it on her desk without forwarding a copy to Taylor. Taylor calls six times to check on the status of the case, but all of the calls go unanswered. The settlement offer expires before Taylor ever sees it.
Answers
Answer:
Her actions were illegal
Explanation:
We could make the conclusion that the attorney's actions were illegal. Consider, under the requirements of the law, an attorney acts as a representative to clients by giving advice to the clients, etc.
But they do not have the responsibility of making decisions for their clients except they receive the consent of their clients.
Which of the following is not an example of an express warranty?
a. "This jacket is lined."
b. "This water heater holds 50 gallons."
c. "This toothpaste makes teeth the whitest around."
d. "Preshrunk jeans."
Answers
The answer is d. "Preshrunk jeans." This is not an example of an express warranty because it does not make a specific claim or guarantee about the product.
Express warranties are statements made by the seller or manufacturer about the product's quality, performance, or features. In options a, b, and c, the statements clearly make claims about the product's characteristics, such as being lined, holding a specific amount of water, or making teeth the whitest. These statements would be considered express warranties.
However, the statement about preshrunk jeans does not make any specific claims or guarantees, so it does not qualify as an express warranty. It is important to note that express warranties are legally enforceable promises about the product and can affect a consumer's rights and remedies if the product does not meet the stated warranty.
Know more about warranty here:
brainly.com/question/31793570
#SPJ11
. Common law is judge-made law. It is the sum total of all the cases decided by Select . 2. Select two of the most important goals of common law: a. predictability b. spontaneity c. severity d. flexibility e. tenacity f. rigidity 3. Stare decisis means Select .
Answers
Answer:
Severity and Tenacity
Explanation:
Common law consists of the present day British court. The transgressions are generally based on severity and paying the right consequence.
are police bad? most of them are.
Answers
Answer:
I don't know I think that they sometimes just hurt people because they are doing their job but I honestly don't know.
Explanation:
it is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer? 12 21 8 18 submit answer
Answers
It is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
What is law?The precise definition of law, which is a set of rules created and enforced by social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, has long been debated.It has been described as both a science and an art form. State-enforced laws can be enacted by a group legislature or a single legislator, resulting in statutes; by the executive via decrees and regulations; or by judges via precedent, typically in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals may enter into legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that use alternative dispute resolution methods to traditional court litigation. A child under the age of 18 cannot, for example, ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.Therefore, it is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
Know more about laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
It is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer?
a. 12
b. 21
c. 8
d. 18
which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?
Answers
The correct answer is judicial activism that acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent.
According to the legal theory of "judicial activism," courts can and must consider societal effects in addition to the law that applies when making decisions. It is occasionally used in defiance of court restraint.
It refers to a judge deviating from precedent and relying more heavily on their own convictions while rendering decisions. Politicians disagree on both the overall concept of judicial activism and specific activist judgements.
Additionally, they contend that the judiciary invalidates the actions of both elected and unelected officials, including sometimes legislative acts that reflect the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time of passage rather than necessarily the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time the legislation is invalidated.
To find similar questions related with 'judicial activism'
visit- https://brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
If someone loses their court case in federal district court in Florida, they have a right to have their case heard a second time by the ______ U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals under that court's __________ jurisdiction.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
u
Privileges or immunities of national citizenship are most evident outside of the country.
Answers
Answer:
please say that! now what should we do?
Write one paragraph (3-4 sentences) that answer the following 2 questions:
1. Why is it important for a society to have laws?
2. Provide examples of 2 laws that, in your opinion, are necessary to our way of life in the United States.
Answers
An employer properly brought a conversion action against an employee in federal district court sitting in diversity jurisdiction. The employee's answer contained an age discrimination counterclaim against his employer based on federal law. The answer was prepared, signed, and filed by the employee's attorney. The employee's attorney did not act in bad faith, but did not reasonably investigate the factual contentions made in the counterclaim. The employer's attorney filed with the court and served on the employee's attorney a motion to dismiss the counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The next day, the employer's attorney served a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 on the employee's attorney based on the failure to reasonably investigate the factual contentions contained in the counterclaim, but did not file this motion with the court. Twenty days later and prior to the court ruling on the dismissal motion, the employee's attorney filed a notice of dismissal with respect to the counterclaim.May the employer's attorney continue to pursue its motion for sanctions by filing it with the court?
Answers
Yes, the employer's attorney may continue to pursue their motion for sanctions by filing it with the court.
This motion must be filed within 21 days after the opposing party's notice of dismissal. However, if the court has already ruled on the dismissal motion, then the motion for sanctions is no longer allowed. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an attorney must conduct a reasonable investigation into the facts and law related to the claims made in a counterclaim or other legal action. If the attorney does not conduct this investigation, then the court may impose sanctions on the attorney.
to know more about attorney:
https://brainly.com/question/22471236
#SPJ11
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.