Answer:
Though a priest, he also benefited from the conquest as the owner of an encomienda, a plantation with Indian indentured laborers.
Explanation:
plz give me brainliest
What is an example of the second great awakenings influence on society?
Answer:
Many churches experienced a great increase in membership, particularly among Methodist and Baptist churches. The Second Great Awakening made soul-winning the primary function of ministry and stimulated several moral and philanthropic reforms, including temperance and the emancipation of women.
Explanation:
hope this helps!
Main focus of the war in the west
Answer:
Early in the war, the focus was on two key states: Missouri and Kentucky. The Union cause would have been crippled if either had been lost. Missouri was kept in the Union primarily due to Captain Nathaniel Lyon's successes, particularly his victory at Boonville in June.
Explanation:
Describe three technological developments in warfare during wwi.
Answer:
Gas
Machine Guns
Trenches
Explanation:
ww1 was all about using mustard gas and it was popularized before being banned after ww1 and ww1 was the first introduction to full auto machine guns similar to LMGs nowdays and trenches were created to prevent getting shot, gassed or sprayed down by enemies
Approximately how many bills did Johnson introduce to Congress as part of his Great Society?
Answer:
87 bills
Explanation:
A system if ____is the enlightenment idea proposed bu Baron Montesquieu in which there is a separation of the powers in the government. Thus, giving each branch the power to limit the actions of the other branches.
Answer:
checks and balances
Explanation:
Baron de Montesquieu, who is considered as French Philosopher during the Age of Enlightenment, was known for his philosophical works, particularly on theory of Separation of Powers, which is basically deals with a system OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.
This was defined by him, as a type of government in which state is made of three branches, specifically the executive, legislative and judiciary, such that, each branch has power that do not supercede one another but rather compliment and independent enough, for the purpose of curbing corrupt practices associated with power, while promoting CHECKS and BALANCES among the branches.
This idea is later entrenched in many system of government of the world today.
Why do you think most people remained indifferent to what was going on around them?
A person becomes indifferent to others, because a sense of responsibility and respect for humanity no longer means anything to him.
What does it mean to be a bystander?Bystanders are those who see acts of violence or the circumstances that support them. Despite not being directly involved, they have the power to step in, speak up, or take action. They are those who are there and may have the ability to deter, stop, or halt a potential incident.
There are two ways that the word "bystander" is employed in relation to the Holocaust. The first refers to foreign or worldwide "bystanders" who, due to their separation from the actual events, serve as figurative witnesses. The governments of the Allies and neutral nations, as well as Jewish organizations and institutions, are only a few examples of these "bystanders." The second—the subject of this article—refers to "bystanders" in communities around the occurrences who are frequently physically present.
To learn more about violence, click
https://brainly.com/question/8075105
#SPJ1
Help pls ill give brainlest
Answer:
D: Crusaders capture and loot Constantinople
Explanation:
in a Democratic government each individual's opinion_____.
A.) is based on the facts
B.) is of equal importance
C.) will determine the outcome of an election
D.) can be expressed publically
Given what you know about the state of affairs in Europe in 1914 as well as the main drivers
that ultimately caused the fighting to break out in Europe, why do you think that the leaders of
Britain, France, Germany and Russia were not able to prevent the outbreak of war? Why didn't
diplomacy work?
Answer:
As there had been tension between the countries for years as everyone wanted more land, more power and the strongest military and economic power. Also as they all had signed a load of treaties out of fear of invasion or war. So when a bunch of young Serbians assassinated the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, The Austrian government thought that the Serbian leaders had ordered the murder [they most likely did] and declared war on Serbia, as Austria- Hungary had an alliance with Germany they declared war on Serbia but Serbia had an alliance with France, who had an alliance with Britain so both of them declared war on Austria and Germany.
Explanation:
Fun Fact: the King of Britain, Emperor of Germany and Tsar of Russia were all first cousins and were all in power when they went to war.
How can bad U.S. domestic policy and foreign policy impact/affect people living in the United States ? Answer for each type of policy.
I.NEED.HELP
Answer:
It is widely recognized that foreign and domestic issues are now powerfully joined. But we need to fully understand how they intersect and what that means for the world. Earlier this year, the Geoeconomics and Strategy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace launched a series of case studies to help policy experts answer this fundamental question:
Are significant changes to U.S. foreign policy required to better advance the economic interests of America’s middle class?
Leading up to the U.S. presidential 2020 election, candidates will be seeking direction on how best to address Americans’ struggles amid uncertain domestic and global environments. However, before policy experts across the political spectrum share their views, they should first test their long-held assumptions about the economic fortunes of America’s middle class and how various U.S. foreign policies may impact them. Local economies across the country look very different today than they did in past decades, and sticking with traditional approaches, or radically departing from them, might ultimately do more harm than good.
Explanation:
Using a Bible and additional sources, type a report of no less than 125 words on how Rebekah suffered for aiding Jacob in deceiving Isaac. (Include Scripture references.)
Rebecca went to God to ask why she was suffering so much because her pregnancy was so unpleasant
How did Rebekah suffer in the Bible?Rebecca went to God to ask why she was suffering so much because her pregnancy was so unpleasant. According to the Midrash, if she passed a home where people studied the Torah, Jacob would fight to leave, while Esau would fuss to leave a home where people worshipped idols. He covered his arms in lamb skin and clothed himself in Esau's finest attire so that if his blind father touched him, he would mistake Jacob for his more hirsute sibling. Isaac was served a plate of goat meat made by Rebecca to resemble venison.Rebekah was faced with the decision of whether to leave her family and wed a man she had never met and knew nothing about. It took a lot of faith to do this. The fact that marriage is about faith as well as love is one of the first significant lessons Isaac and Rebekah teach about faith.
To learn more about Rebekah refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29042895
#SPJ1
After the deadly bubonic plague of 1348 to 1352, the population of England was drastically reduced. This meant that the peasant class gained more power because of the lack of available labor. They started getting richer and could afford small luxuries. However, this displeased the noble class. They passed ______laws that prevented the peasants from purchasing luxurious goods.
Answer:
However, this displeased the noble class. They passed draconian laws that prevented the peasants from purchasing luxurious goods. The draconian law that was passed was "high tax law" which eventually lead to the Peasant Revolts.
Explanation:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 contained all of the following provisions * A) declaring Nebraska to be free territory B) creating two new federal territories C) repealing the antislavery provision of the Missouri Compromise D) allowing voters and territorial legislatures to decide the slavery issue for themselves E) creating popular sovereignty as a method of compromise
The correct answer is A) declaring Nebraska to be free territory.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 contained all of the following provisions, except declaring Nebraska to be a free territory.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act contained the creation of two new federal territories, repealing the antislavery provision of the Missouri Compromise, allowing voters and territorial legislatures to decide the slavery issue for themselves, and creating popular sovereignty as a method of compromise.
The basic element of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was that this legislation allowed people to decide if slavery was going to be authorized in the state. This created more and more confrontation between the northern and the southern states to the degree of being one of the causes that started teh American Civil War.
NEED HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE AWNSER CORRECTLY NO GUESSING
Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation:
u took the test
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Sorry if this is incorrect. I just googled it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
which term describes the view that only fundamental bill of rights protections should apply to the states
Answer:
The incorporation doctrine
Explanation:
The incorporation doctrine is a constitutional doctrine through which the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) are made applicable to the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
o/ PLS HELP SKJGSDFG
Which of the following presidents invoked the Monroe Doctrine to justify intervention in South America?
Theodore Roosevelt
All these answers
John F. Kennedy
Ronald Reagan
Answer:
All of these.
Explanation:
Many presidents, including these three, have used the Monroe Doctrine to justify intervention.
Hope this helped.
Explain the benefits of dividing the Islamic Caliphate into provinces and include what provinces are. Describe how this helped lead into the Abbasid Golden Age.
The division of the Islamic Caliphate into provinces or "vilayets" helped to decentralize the power of the caliphate and allow for greater local governance. This system allowed for efficient administration of large territories, ensuring that each region was effectively managed and governed.
The provinces were geographically defined regions within the caliphate, each with its own governor or "wali."
This division led to the growth of trade, industry, and agriculture, as governors were able to focus on the development of their respective regions. It also allowed for the implementation of effective tax systems and the redistribution of wealth, leading to economic prosperity throughout the empire. The decentralization of power also paved the way for the Abbasid Golden Age, which was a period of great cultural, scientific, and intellectual advancements. The Abbasid caliphs were able to focus on the development of art, architecture, literature, and science, leading to the establishment of great institutions like the House of Wisdom in Baghdad. Overall, the division of the Islamic Caliphate into provinces was a critical factor in the prosperity of the Islamic empire and the flourishing of the Abbasid Golden Age. It allowed for efficient administration, economic growth, and cultural advancement, paving the way for the Islamic world to become a beacon of knowledge and innovation.Know more about the Islamic Caliphate
https://brainly.com/question/30201752
#SPJ11
Describe how Rome consolidated its power.
Answer:
The Roman Empire was extremely successful and they were able to maintain, gain and consolidate their power mainly through EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION. In fact the Romans are considered the inventors of paved roads. The roads were very practical when it came to moving the armies to conquer new lands. The network of roads were vital to achieve this task. The Roman army was able to advance 40 kilometers a day on average. The Roman Empire, Rome had conquered many regions and there were people to be controlled and ruled over. The roads were also used to transport messages, officials, and tax revenue between the provinces.
Also, there were other factors that contribute to their success like CONTROL OF THE SEA, which Romans were able to obtain thanks to their naval power. This control of the sea allow them to increase economic wealth and military power which eventually gave them and strategic advantage.
At the same time, there was the ROMAN REPUBLIC which was an important contributor to the Roman success. Many politicians and aristocrats had an insatiable appetite for glory and conquer so they could get more prestige among their peers and also more authority.
Finally, it was a combination of all of these factors and even some smaller ones that together contributed to the rise of the Roman Empire :)
Explanation:
Hope this helps :) ( I had the same exact question for history )
What is a central idea of the excerpt?
Answer choices for the above question
A. The common images of Indians are unfair and far from the reality of Indian life.
B. Most American children have no idea that Indians live on reservations.
C. Indians won more battles against white men than they lost.
D. Most of the wars fought between white men and Indians were conflicts over Indian artistic creations.
The central idea of the text is that : The common images of Indians are unfair and far from the reality of Indian life.
What is the central idea of a text?The key concept may also be used to refer to the major notion. What, therefore, is the text's main theme or core notion? It's just what the text is mostly about. The author selects a subject and then choose the aspects of that subject to emphasize. The text's core theme is that focal point.
The reader must often make assumptions because the main point is frequently not presented directly. An inference requires the reader to extrapolate meaning from the context of the material.
When the reader employs a two-step procedure, an inference can be drawn.
Read more on central idea of text here: https://brainly.com/question/1914190
#SPJ1
What did the Petition of Right aim to prevent the monarch from doing? Choose three answers. restricting freedom of religion negotiating with foreign powers establishing martial law in peacetime imprisoning people without just cause raising taxes without Parliament approval
Answer:
1. establishing martial law in peacetime
2. imprisoning people without just cause
3. raising taxes without Parliament approval
Explanation:
The Petition of Right in 1628 was the petition written and sent by the English Parliament to the then King Charles 1. The purpose of the petition is to prevent the monarch from doing certain things such as:
1. establishing martial law in peacetime
2. imprisoning people without just cause
3. raising taxes without Parliament approval
This is to guide against the arbitrary use or abuse of power by the King.
Answer:
b d e
Explanation:
got it right
Which of the following characteristics did Rome share with Han China?
both went from a republic to an empire
" All of the choices are correct.
in both, a peasant could rise to a higher position by taking a civil service exam
both had trouble with nomadic raiders
Answer:both went from empire to republic
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights ensures that all U.S. citizens:
SAUNA
A. can travel between states at any time.
O B. can freely criticize the federal government.
O C. can vote regardless of their race or gender.
O D. can avoid paying taxes they believe are unfair.
Answer:
can vote regardless of their race or gender.
Explanation:
civil rights protect people of color and protect them from many other things like slavery and forced working but it also allows them the right to vote
What animals were native to the new world ?
A. Horses
B. Turkeys
C.Cows
D.Pigs
E.Shesp
Answer:I believe it is turkeys
Explanation:
help me with this!!!!
Answer:
The cell nucleus acts like the brain of the cell
The chloroplast turns energy from the sun into energy the cell can use
Explanation:
What justifications/reasons were used to take the land ?
Answer:
Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.
Explanation:
Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices.Listen
During the era of the lord-vassal society in Japan, which group of people actually ruled
Japan and truly held power?
1. the emperors
2. the artisans
3.the samurai
4. the shoguns
what does Mercenary mean?
which bicycle did women primarily ride in the 1890s
In the 1890s, the most common type of bicycle that women primarily rode was the safety bicycle
In the 1890s, the bicycle became increasingly popular among women as a mode of transportation and leisure activity. The most common type of bicycle that women rode during this time was the "safety bicycle," which had a lower crossbar, allowing for easier mounting and dismounting while wearing a skirt.
The safety bicycle was also lighter and more maneuverable than earlier models, making it more suitable for women to ride. Another popular style of bicycle among women in the 1890s was the "tricycle," which had three wheels instead of two, providing greater stability and balance. However, the safety bicycle became more popular than the tricycle because it was faster and more versatile.
Learn more about bicycle here
brainly.com/question/5338580
#SPJ4
evaluate the extent to which debates over slavery in the period from 1830 to 1860
The debate over slavery was one of the most contentious issues from 1830 to 1860. During this time, the discussion focused on whether or not slavery should be abolished in the United States.
The debate over slavery was characterized by intense arguments between supporters of slavery and those who opposed it. Those who supported slavery argued that it was essential to the South's economy and a legal institution protected by the Constitution. They also argued that slaves were better off under the care of their owners than they would be if they were free. Those who opposed slavery asserted that it was immoral and violated the principles of freedom and equality on which the United States was founded. They argued that slavery was a violation of the fundamental human rights of African Americans and that it was a stain on the moral character of the nation. The debate over slavery was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Civil War. As tensions between the North and South grew, the issue of slavery became increasingly divisive. While some politicians and activists worked to find a compromise solution, others were convinced that slavery could only be abolished through force. In conclusion, the debate over slavery in the period from 1830 to 1860 was intense and often contentious. It was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Civil War, and it reflected deep divisions in American society over the issue of slavery and the future of the nation.
Learn more about Slavery here: https://brainly.com/question/21151785.
#SPJ11
What do the 2nd, 3rd and 4th amendments protect citizens from?
Answer:
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Third Amendment
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Government workers entering your home