A military advisor could use the information in the article to persuade a country's leaders to follow International Law during times of war by highlighting the benefits of adhering to these laws. The article explains how following International Law can help reduce the negative impact of armed conflict on civilians, limit the use of weapons of mass destruction, and ensure that prisoners of war are treated humanely.
The military advisor could argue that following International Law during times of war not only demonstrates a country's commitment to justice and humanity but also helps to preserve its reputation on the global stage. The article highlights how violations of International Law can result in international condemnation, sanctions, and even military intervention, as seen in the case of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.
Furthermore, the military advisor could point out that following International Law during times of war can also benefit a country's own military personnel. For example, adhering to the Geneva Conventions and other treaties can help protect soldiers who are captured or wounded in combat and ensure that they are treated humanely.
In summary, a military advisor could use the information in the article to persuade a country's leaders to follow International Law during times of war by emphasizing the benefits of doing so, such as reducing harm to civilians, limiting the use of weapons of mass destruction, preserving a country's reputation, and protecting its own military personnel.
A military advisor could use the information in the article to persuade a country's leaders to follow International Law during times of war by highlighting the benefits of doing so.
The article states that respecting International Law can lead to greater legitimacy, increased cooperation from other countries, and better protection for military personnel. By following International Law, a country can avoid negative consequences such as being labeled as a rogue state or facing legal consequences for war crimes.
Additionally, a military advisor could point out that following International Law can also lead to more effective military operations. For example, respecting the laws of war can reduce civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure, which can help win the support of local populations and decrease the likelihood of retaliation from opposing forces.
Overall, by emphasizing the advantages of following International Law, a military advisor can persuade a country's leaders to prioritize compliance with these laws during times of war.
This can not only help protect the country's reputation and military personnel, but also lead to more effective military operations and increased cooperation from other nations.
To know more about International Law click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/18597093#
#SPJ11
What is the protection of individual rights?
Which of the following explains why the Bill of Rights was so appealing to the Anti-federalists?
A. It gave women the right to vote.
B.It put limits on the federal government.
C. It gave the federal government more power.
D. It protected the states' rights to print money.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
its d because I saw it in class
How did the romans conquering various Italian tribes' effect and
shape the roman civilization?
The Romans conquering various Italian tribes shaped the Roman civilization by expanding their territory and incorporating diverse cultural and political influences.
The Roman conquest of various Italian tribes had a profound impact on the development and shaping of Roman civilization. As the Romans expanded their territorial control, they encountered and assimilated numerous indigenous tribes, each with their own unique cultural and political systems. This process of conquest and assimilation played a pivotal role in shaping the Roman civilization in several ways.
Firstly, the Roman conquest allowed for the expansion of Roman influence and control over a vast territory, establishing a unified Roman state. The conquered territories provided resources, manpower, and strategic advantages that fueled the growth and prosperity of the Roman Empire. The assimilation of diverse Italian tribes into the Roman fold allowed for the consolidation of power and the establishment of a strong centralized government.
Secondly, the interaction with different Italian tribes exposed the Romans to a variety of cultural practices and traditions. The Romans were skilled at adopting and adapting foreign customs, technologies, and ideas, which greatly enriched their own culture. They incorporated elements of the conquered peoples' languages, religious beliefs, architecture, and art, blending them with their own to create a unique Roman civilization with a diverse cultural heritage.
Furthermore, the conquest of the Italian tribes also had a significant impact on the Roman political system. The Romans incorporated elements of the conquered tribes' governmental structures into their own governance. They adopted practices such as the organization of conquered territories into provinces and the incorporation of local elites into the Roman administrative system. This pragmatic approach helped to ensure stability and effective governance over the vast territories under Roman control.
In conclusion, the Romans conquering various Italian tribes not only expanded their territory but also had a profound impact on the development and shaping of Roman civilization. The assimilation of diverse cultures, the incorporation of foreign ideas and practices, and the adoption of effective governance methods all contributed to the formation of a powerful and culturally diverse Roman Empire.
Learn more about Roman civilization
brainly.com/question/15011869
#SPJ11
The family of Jin Huo, a farmer living during the Han Dynasty, has cultivated the same patch of land for many decades. Suddenly, Huo and his family are being forced off their land. Huo is a good Confucian and wants to do his part for the good of his society, but he also has an obligation to support his family. What is the most likely cause of Jin Huo’s dilemma?
Answer:
A wealthy landowner wants to combine Jin Hou’s farm with his own.
Explanation:
Not only were farmers heavily taxed during the Han Dynasty—they were constantly fighting to keep their land out of the hands of the wealthier landowners, who had more influence in the government.
A Dilemma is simply known as when an individual is in any situation that makes them to select or choose between things that are all bad or is not to one's taste or satisfaction.
Jin Hou's was faced with the dilemma of having make the right decision between the two decision that is before Him.Han dynasty uses confucianism as a basis for government so as to encouraged personal responsibility and loyalty to one's family and society.
Conclusively, Jin Hou's was faced with the dilemma of having to gives is land out and his beliefs.
Learn more from
https://brainly.com/question/20177663
Dr. Ambedkar said that "In politics, we will have equality, and in social and economic life we will have inequality". Study the statements below and generate a conclusion that is not true
(1 Point)
a) In politics, Dalits can enjoy the universal adult franchise but not in the economic field.
b) The constitution recognises equality before the law, but in real life, some Indians are more privileged than others.
c) Despite constitutional guarantees, the Dalits face violence and discrimination.
d) In politics, Dalits will be recognising the principle of one man one vote and one value and also enjoy equality in the social and economic field
The statement that is not true is option d) "In politics, Dalits will be recognizing the principle of one man one vote and one value and also enjoy equality in the social and economic field."
The statement in option d) is not true because Dr. Ambedkar's quote explicitly acknowledges that while there may be equality in politics, there will still be inequality in social and economic life. Dalits, who are a historically marginalized community in India, continue to face significant social and economic disparities despite political representation and the recognition of their rights in the constitution.
Options a), b), and c) align with Dr. Ambedkar's statement and reflect the reality of social and economic inequality faced by Dalits in India. Option a) recognizes that Dalits may have equal political rights through universal adult franchise, but they still experience inequality in the economic field.
Option b) acknowledges that although the constitution guarantees equality before the law, some individuals in India enjoy privileges and advantages over others. Option c) highlights the persistent challenges faced by Dalits, including violence and discrimination, despite constitutional guarantees.
Therefore, the statement in option d) contradicts Dr. Ambedkar's assertion that inequality exists in social and economic life, even if there is political equality.
Learn more about Dalits here :
https://brainly.com/question/11707391
#SPJ11
? Question
Choose all of the correct answers.
Which Enlightenment ideals can be found in the Declaration of Independence?
A.)Free enterprise
B.)Consent of the governed
C.) Individual liberties
D.)Freedom of religion
Answer:
individual liberties
Freedom of religion
Explanation:
The first thing that gets declared at the independence is individual liberties or independence of libertiesThe the independence of choosing religion of any kind is providedOption C and D
Answer:
C. Individual liberties
D. Freedom of religion
Explanation:
The Enlightenment ideals called for the use of senses to achieve human happiness through liberty, progress, etc.
Options C and D are the Enlightenment Ideals found in the Declaration of Independence
Marbury v. Madison established the principle of ______ review. According to _____ review, the ________ Court determines if laws and executive acts are unconstitutional.
Answer:
Judicial, Judicial, Supreme.
Explanation:
:3
16. the mystery document is actually andrew jackson’s what?
The mystery document that is actually Andrew Jackson's is known as the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Andrew Jackson, who was the seventh president of the United States, signed the act into law on May 28, 1830. The act allowed the federal government to exchange unsettled land in the western territories for Indian territory within existing state boundaries.The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was controversial and unpopular, as it required the forced removal of indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands. Thousands of Native Americans were forcibly relocated to the west of the Mississippi River in what is now known as the Trail of Tears.
The Indian Removal Act was a significant event in American history, as it led to the forced removal of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands. The removal process, known as the Trail of Tears, was a tragic and devastating event that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Native Americans due to disease, starvation, and exposure.
Learn more about Andrew Jackson's Visit: brainly.com/question/1297968
#SPJ11
which of the following represents a bourgeois principle that became a central underpinning of individual freedom for all citizens?
a. freedom from military service
b. freedom of assembly
c. gender equality
d. freedom from property requirements in order to vote
The option that represents a bourgeois principle that became a central underpinning of individual freedom for all citizens is "d. freedom from property requirements in order to vote."
Individual freedom is the essential aspect of a free society that offers equal rights and opportunities for everyone. The underpinning of individual freedom of citizens is a bourgeoisie principle, as per the given question. Property requirements in order to vote as a bourgeois principle, which became a central underpinning of individual freedom for all citizens. This bourgeois principle paved the way for many lower-class citizens to participate in the political process.
Therefore, freedom from property requirements in order to vote represents a bourgeois principle that became a central underpinning of individual freedom for all citizens.
Learn more about bourgeois
https://brainly.com/question/30782154
#SPJ11
Who helped launch the factory system in the united states?A. Eli WhitneyB. Samuel SlaterC. Francis Cabo Lowell D. Henry Ford
The correct option is B. Samuel Slater helped launch the factory system in the United States.
In the late 1700s, the Industrial Revolution had its beginnings in Great Britain. It quickly extended to the United States, where it altered how goods were produced as well as how people lived and worked. The Northeast was the site of the initial phase of the American Industrial Revolution.
According to many historians, the Industrial Revolution in the United States began in 1793 with the opening of a textile mill in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Samuel Slater, an English immigrant who had studied how to run a textile mill in his native country, founded the factory. Later, Slater would establish thirteen textile factories in the area.
Early English-American industrialist Samuel Slater is referred to as the "Founder of the American Industrial Revolution" and the "Father of the American Factory System."
To learn more about American Industrial Revolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/816588
#SPJ4
Why did Colonial America adopt only part of the English legal system
Why did Colonial America adopt only part of the English legal system?
Colonial America knew that they needed to adopt all of English law in order to keep order as it was only in the twentieth century that they dropped private prosecutors.
Colonial America knew that they needed to adopt all of English law in order to keep order as it was only in the twentieth century that they dropped private prosecutors.
Colonial America kept parts of the English system until they were able to substitute Dutch and French influences that abolished private prosecutors.
Colonial America kept parts of the English system until they were able to substitute Dutch and French influences that abolished private prosecutors.
Colonial America did not want any part of the English system and only kept the private prosecutors until the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Colonial America did not want any part of the English system and only kept the private prosecutors until the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Colonial America used the English legal system as a foundation and built the current system from the existing British system.
Colonial America used the English legal system as a foundation and built the current system from the existing British system.
The majority of American institutions have evolved along their own lines since the early eighteenth century and up until the present. This development was largely influenced by English development, colonial development, and American political thought and constructive statesmanship.
English legal system continued to have an impact on the creation of colonial legislation and court rulings throughout the eighteenth century, though maybe less so during the American Revolution. Even today, the American Common Law and Equity system is fundamentally the same as that of England.
Know more about English legal system here
https://brainly.com/question/1918391
#SPJ1
Which statement explains an immediate effect of the Spanish-American War on the United States?
It developed a policy of containment to stop the spread of communism.
It gained Texas, California, and New York from Mexico.
It was given control over territories in the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea.
It gained China and Japan.
The statement that gives an immediate effect of the Spanish-American War on the United States is that the country gained Texas, California, and New York from Mexico.
What was significance the Spanish-American War?During the 1800s, the Spanish-American War was a military conflict that occurred between the United States and Spain in which ended the Spanish colonial rule in the Americas and resulted in U.S. acquisition of regions both in the western Pacific and Latin America.
The conflict is said to originated from the Cuban struggle for their independence from Spain in February 1895 as the Cuban war was so injurious to U.S. because they had investments in the island which were estimated at $50 million and almost ended the U.S. trade with Cuban ports.
Furthermore, the Cuban war waged against the property led to the destruction of sugarcane and sugar mills and also had effect on U.S. monetary interests which was largely appealing to American humanitarian sentiment.
In conclusion, the main significance of the Spanish-American War was it ended the Spain's colonial empire in the west and helped to secured the position of the United States as a Pacific power.
Read more about Spanish-American War
brainly.com/question/10443525
#SPJ1
What were 3 major events that occurred leading up to the civil war?
Answer:
1619-1865 | The Peculiar Institution
Slavery arrived in North America along side the Spanish and English colonists of the 17th and 18th centuries, with an estimated 645,000 Africans imported during the more than 250 years the institution was legal. But slavery never existed without controversy. The British colony of Georgia actually banned slavery from 1735 to 1750, although it remained legal in the other 12 colonies. After the American Revolution, northern states one by one passed emancipation laws, and the sectional divide began to open as the South became increasingly committed to slavery. Once called a “necessary evil” by Thomas Jefferson, proponents of slavery increasingly switched their rhetoric to one that described slavery as a benevolent Christian institution that benefited all parties involved: slaves, slave owners, and non-slave holding whites. The number of slaves compared to number of free blacks varied greatly from state to state in the southern states. In 1860, for example, both Virginia and Mississippi had in excess of 400,000 slaves, but the Virginia population also included more than 58,000 free blacks, as opposed to only 773 in Mississippi. In 1860, South Carolina was the only state to have a majority slave population, yet in all southern states slavery served as the foundation for their socioeconomic and political order.
1820 | The Missouri Compromise
mo compromise 300
This 1856 map shows the line (outlined in red) established by the Missouri Compromise. (Library of Congress)
In the growth years following the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, Congress was compelled to establish a policy to guide the expansion of slavery into the new western territory. Missouri’s application for statehood as a slave state sparked a bitter national debate. In addition to the deeper moral issue posed by the growth of slavery, the addition of pro-slavery Missouri legislators would give the pro-slavery faction a Congressional majority.
Ultimately, Congress reached a series of agreements that became known as the Missouri Compromise. Missouri was admitted as a slave state and Maine was admitted as a free state, preserving the Congressional balance. A line was also drawn through the unincorporated western territories along the 36°30' parallel, dividing north and south as free and slave.
Thomas Jefferson, upon hearing of this deal, “considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed indeed for the moment. But this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence. A geographical line, coinciding with a marked principle, moral and political, once conceived and held up to the angry passions of men, will never be obliterated; and every new irritation will mark it deeper and deeper.”
1831 | Nat Turner’s Rebellion
nat turner
Nat Turner interpreted two solar eclipses as instructions from God to begin his rebellion. (Library of Congress)
In August of 1831, a slave named Nat Turner incited an uprising that spread through several plantations in southern Virginia. Turner and approximately seventy cohorts killed around sixty white people. The deployment of militia infantry and artillery suppressed the rebellion after two days of terror.
Fifty-five slaves, including Turner, were tried and executed for their role in the insurrection. Nearly two hundred more were lynched by frenzied mobs. Although small-scale slave uprisings were fairly common in the American South, Nat Turner’s rebellion was the bloodiest.
Virginia lawmakers reacted to the crisis by rolling back what few civil rights slaves and free black people possessed at the time. Education was prohibited and the right to assemble was severely limited.
1846 - 1850 | The Wilmot Proviso
The Wilmot Proviso was a piece of legislation proposed by David Wilmot (D-FS-R PA) at the close of the Mexican-American War. If passed, the Proviso would have outlawed slavery in territory acquired by the United States as a result of the war, which included most of the Southwest and extended all the way to California.
Wilmot spent two years fighting for his plan. He offered it as a rider on existing bills, introduced it to Congress on its own, and even tried to attach it to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. All attempts failed. Nevertheless, the intensity of the debate surrounding the Proviso prompted the first serious discussions of secession.
Explanation:
Which of the following documents was important to convincing the American colonists to break away from Britain?
Magna Carta
Mayflower Compact
English Bill of Rights
Paine's Common Sense
The pamphlet written by Paine helped to convince the American colonists to break away from Britain. Thus, option D is correct.
Who are colonists?A colonist is a person who moves or migrates to the other country and settles down in that colony with the people of their own nation are called colonist. These are the people who settle in a new land and start their life in that country.
He writes in that document that all should make a collective stand and even the colonist should join and make a radical decision of not being under anyone else's rule.
Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet named common sense in the 17th century, whose focus was to free the Americans from Britain and further make it into a democratic republic. Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about colonists, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17268974
#SPJ6
Answer:
The Answer is Option D or Plaines common sense
Explanation:
.
Why would sailors take a longer route along the coastline instead of the shortest distance between two points?
The longer coastal routes offer better navigational aids, access to sheltered harbors, and quicker access to safe havens, making them a safer and more practical choice for sailors.
Sailors often opt to take longer routes along the coastline instead of sailing the shortest distance between two points for several practical reasons.
First and foremost, coastal routes offer better navigational aids and landmarks, which can significantly enhance safety and reduce the risk of running aground or colliding with underwater hazards. By following the coastline, sailors can easily identify headlands, lighthouses, and other visual references that help them maintain their course and avoid potential dangers.
Coastal routes also provide access to sheltered harbors and anchorages, allowing sailors to find respite during inclement weather or unfavorable sailing conditions. This is particularly important when facing adverse wind patterns, strong currents, or rough seas, as staying closer to the coast enables quicker access to safe havens and facilitates easier navigation in challenging environments.
To learn more about sailors
https://brainly.com/question/30256115
#SPJ4
n
a
All of the following were responsibilities of the presidio EXCEPT
attacking French colonies.
b. protecting the mission.
c. protecting the nearby settlement,
d. maintaining control of the Native Americans in the missions,
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Ο Α
B
ΟΟΟΟ
С C
D
Answer:
It is a.
Explanation:
Edg. 2020
Question 1 of 10
What does a trust do?
OA. Finds the best way to sell goods at a low price
B. Allows one group to control many companies
C. Chooses people to hire workers for a company
D. Looks for ways to make working conditions better
Which is not a way Christianity was diffused into the Americas, Africa and Asia?
A Populations remained the same
B Colonists migrated to new lands
C Influence from Catholic and Protestant colonies
D Indigenous populations converted
What did carter and warren argue that the major political trend of the 16th and early 17th centuries was?
The major political trend of the 16th and early 17th centuries was the shift towards centralized monarchies, driven by the decline of feudalism, the rise of nation-states, religious conflicts, and exploration.
Carter and Warren argued that the major political trend of the 16th and early 17th centuries was the shift towards centralized monarchies. During this time, many European nations experienced a consolidation of power under their respective monarchs. This trend was driven by several factors.
1. The decline of feudalism: Feudalism, a system where power was decentralized and land was granted in exchange for loyalty, began to lose its grip. Monarchs sought to centralize power and reduce the influence of feudal lords.
2. The rise of nation-states: The concept of nation-states emerged, where a central authority ruled over a defined territory. Monarchs sought to strengthen their own nations by consolidating power within their borders.
3. Religious conflicts: Religious divisions, such as the Protestant Reformation, led to power struggles between monarchs and religious institutions. Monarchs often used religion as a means to assert control and unify their realms.
4. Exploration and colonization: As European nations expanded their influence overseas, the need for centralized authority became more apparent. Monarchs needed to assert control over overseas territories and manage their expanding empires.
Learn more about political trend
https://brainly.com/question/32181429
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT evidence from your text to support the following claim:
PNW Coastal Natives and European/American explorers tended to get along when they first made contact.
Question 1 options:
They traded items with each other and learned about each other's cultures.
Europeans were respectful of Native rights to their land.
Furs, carved bowls and food were traded for explorers' knives, eyeglasses, and clothing.
Native people believed they were sharing the land, not giving it away.
Answer:
Europeans were respectful of native rights to their land...
Explanation:
I have read this passage... I am percent sure of the answer..
During Reconstruction, African Americans in the South gained the right to:
A. attend racially integrated colleges.
B. seize property from Confederate soldiers.
C. vote in state and federal elections.
D. work as farm laborers on plantations.
During Reconstruction, African Americans in the South gained the right to vote in state and federal elections.
What is reconstruction?This involves all the process that leads to rebuilding of a particular nation.
This will allow for restoration in case of separation and disunity and also defines the union among the states involved.
Therefore, During Reconstruction, African Americans in the South gained the right to vote in state and federal elections.
Learn more on reconstruction here,
https://brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ1
what are some possible explanations for the salem witchcraft trials?
Salem witchcraft trials report that "many contemporary ideas imply the girls were suffering from epilepsy, boredom, child maltreatment, mental illness, or even a condition brought on by eating rye contaminated with fungus."
What led to the Salem witch trials and why?Church politics, family disputes, and hysterical youngsters all came together to lead to the Salem witch trials and executions, which took place during a time when there was no political leadership.
What rationale do you have for the Salem witch trials?In colonial Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693, a series of hearings and trials for those accused of witchcraft were known as the Salem witch trials. 20 persons, including 14 women, were executed as a result of the trials; all but one were .
To know more about Salem witchcraft trials visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/5802397
#SPJ4
1 Choose five specific "artifacts" from the information covered in the module. Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event. You should definitely capture the feudal system in some way, the significance of the Church and the Crusades, the beginning of nationalism, and of course at minimum one artifact from Japan. Your artifacts should cover the content of at least three separate lessons. For example, four artifacts from the rise of nationalism and one from medieval Japan would only be from two lessons.
2 Find a picture that represents each of your artifacts. Do enough research to do better than grabbing images from the most popular reference websites. Quick research with the SPRITE Analysis Chart is a great way to study a lesson topic and find an artifact.
3 Write at least four sentences for each artifact. Your description should be at least two sentences and describe/define your artifact (Who, What, When, Where). Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history? Your writing should be clear and specific and you should avoid saying because 'I like it' or 'it's famous.’ Your description and explanation must be written in the following format and must be specific or points will be deducted. Following is an example of a correct explanation:
Tools, weaponry, and pottery are examples of artifacts—human-made items that have been produced, molded, or formed. The use of the phrase is most frequent in archaeology.
What examples of artifacts from daily life are there?We create and use artifacts in our daily lives just as we did in the past. The clothing we wear, the homes we live in, and the forks and knives we use to eat are all examples of artifacts. We also produce artifacts when we build a campfire, step in a concrete puddle, or discard chicken bones in the trash.
What are some examples of artifacts in sentences?Outside the restrooms, there is a glass presentation case with the antiquated artifacts on display. The cassette is become a piece of pop art. The gallery showcases an incredible the gathering of artifacts from both tombs.
To know more about artifacts visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/21322585
#SPJ1
Efferson delays mentioning the american colonies until late in the introduction. how does this delay affect his argument? check the two best answers. it draws readers into the argument and establishes that ideas apply to society. it prevents readers from quickly losing sympathy for the americans. it engages readers by creating a sense of mystery about the americans. it emphasizes that the principles involved are universal, not just american.
Efferson delays mentioning the American colonies until late in the introduction. It draws readers into the argument and establishes that ideas apply to society.
It engages readers and proves that concepts have social implications. The issue of creating one's own identity and running one's own affairs is the first thing Jefferson addresses. He wants everyone to hear this argument and understand its political logic. He would explain the context for this only afterward.
It underscores the fact that the guiding ideals are not simply American but also international. The "self-evident truths" apply to all of humanity, all nations, and every single person on Earth.
Because they possess a free will of their own and are aware of how challenging it is to defend this fundamental freedom, the colonists are those who appreciate and uphold free will because they "consider these truths to be self-evident."
To learn more about American colonies refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4802011
#SPJ4
STAGE 1
Answer the question correctly and you will be given a code that will unlock the next room.
* Required
The Ancient Egyptian referred to "Egypt" as "
"Black Land."
which means
1 point
Your answer
I
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Answer:
STAGE 1
Answer the question correctly and you will be given a code that will unlock the next room.
* Required
The Ancient Egyptian referred to "Egypt" as "
"Black Land."
which means
1 point
Your answer
I
Submit
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Explanation:
hi
question in pic! answer asap for brainliest!
Answer:
The Answer Is Option D
Explanation:
Answer:
D. is correct answe option
Newly independent countries might have been best prepared to establish stable governments if they
If they prioritize inclusive governance, invest in education, promote transparency, uphold the rule of law, and seek international cooperation.
Newly independent countries can establish stable governments by prioritizing several key factors. First, fostering inclusive governance structures that ensure representation and participation from diverse segments of society. Second, investing in education and capacity-building programs to develop a skilled workforce and strengthen institutions. Third, promoting transparency and accountability to combat corruption and build public trust. Fourth, adopting inclusive and consultative processes in drafting constitutions and legal frameworks. Fifth, fostering strong institutions and the rule of law to protect human rights and ensure justice. Finally, engaging in regional and international cooperation to leverage support and learn from successful models. By focusing on these aspects, newly independent countries can increase their chances of establishing stable and prosperous governments that cater to the needs of their citizens.For more such questions on Governance:
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ8
How do some scientists believe that
early people crossed a land bridge
and made it to North America ?
Answer:
It is widely believed that early eurasian people crossed a land bridge where the Bering strait is today between Alaska and Russia. These people eventually became Native Americans.
if i were to mail a letter how many stamps would i need !
Answer:
1
Explanation:
because putting two on is illegal
you believe it was a good choice for the United States to involve itself in imperialism as it did during the Spanish- American war?
Answer:
Why did the US get involved in the Spanish-American War?
Image result for you believe it was a good choice for the United States to involve itself in imperialism as it did during the Spanish- American war?
The reasons for war were many, but there were two immediate ones: America's support for the ongoing struggle by Cubans and Filipinos against Spanish rule, and the mysterious explosion of the battleship U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor.
Explanation:
-hope helps