How can a president get around the difficult process of getting the Senate to ratify a treaty?

A. enter into international executive agreements

B. bring the treaty to the Supreme Court for ratification

C. nothing at all

D. bring the treaty to the House of Representatives for ratification​

Answer:

The idea that those who govern must follow the laws; no one is above the law.

Explanation:

The Rule of Law has a huge impact on our government officials and institutions, from how they are held accountable (responsible) to how decisions are made to how laws are enforced! The Rule of Law protects us from tyranny (corrupt government) and is the foundation of liberty!

Answer:

a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.

The statement, "medicine entails the ordering of more tests, procedures, and consultations than are medically necessary, with the hope of decreasing the likelihood of a lawsuit" is an example of defensive medicine.

Defensive medicine is a practice in which healthcare providers order additional tests, procedures, or consultations that are unnecessary for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient's condition in order to protect themselves from potential malpractice lawsuits. This practice is typically associated with physicians, but it can also be observed in other healthcare professionals like nurses.

Defensive medicine is done with the goal of avoiding lawsuits and reducing the likelihood of malpractice claims. However, it comes with a number of negative consequences, including the cost and time required for extra tests and procedures, the risk of overdiagnosis, and the potential for harm to patients.

Learn more about lawsuit: https://brainly.com/question/31360444

#SPJ11

True. The Pen/Trace statute is a federal law that regulates the collection of communication content.

It allows law enforcement agencies to obtain information related to the communication activities of individuals such as the content of their phone calls or text messages. The Pen/Trace statute has been updated several times over the years to reflect advancements in technology and changes in the way people communicate. However, it is important to note that the law requires agencies to follow specific procedures and obtain court orders before collecting communication content to ensure that privacy rights are protected. Overall, the Pen/Trace statute plays an important role in regulating the collection of communication content and balancing the needs of law enforcement with individual privacy rights.

To know more about communication visit:

brainly.com/question/29811467

#SPJ11

Answer: the false answer is B

Explanation:

In terms of drug crime sentencing, numerous studies reveal discrepancies in the manner that different races and ethnic backgrounds are warranted for such offenses.

To exemplify, Black and Hispanic persons conventionally obtain lengthier prison sentences compared to Whites for a similar drug charges, even when controlling other variables like criminal record and quantity involved. This predicament is frequently known as racial or ethnic variation in drug stipulations.

Moreover, disparities in drug offense severity moreover depend on the kind of drug implicated. For instance, defendants convicted of crack cocaine typically suffer much more stringent sentences than those associated with powder cocaine convictions, irrespective of the fact they have an identical pharmacology. This difference has been widely viewed as racism and economic prejudice since crack-related violations occur more likely amongst low-income earners and marginalized communities.

Learn more about crime on

https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ1

The command for creating a revised draft is called "revising."

Revising is the process of improving the content, organization, and style of a document. It involves re-reading, editing, and making changes to ensure that your writing communicates effectively and clearly. To make a revised draft, start by reading through your work and taking notes about what needs to be revised. Once you have an idea of what needs to be changed, make any necessary edits, rearrange sentences, add/remove details, and make sure the tone of your writing is appropriate. Finally, make sure you proofread your document to ensure it is free of any spelling or grammar errors.

Know more about draft here:

https://brainly.com/question/29443724

#SPJ11    

1. Investigation: Police, prosecutors, and other law enforcement professionals gather evidence to determine whether a crime has occurred.

2. Arrest: Law enforcement officers make an arrest, which initiates the criminal justice process.

3. Bail/Pretrial Release: After an arrest, the court may decide to set bail or release the accused on their own recognizance pending trial.

4. Arraignment: The accused is formally charged with a crime and enters a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest.

5. Trial: The accused stands trial in a court of law and either pleads guilty or is found guilty by a jury.

6. Sentencing: The judge sentences the accused based on the severity of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

7. Appeal: The accused may appeal their conviction to a higher court.

8. Incarceration/Supervision: The court may order the convicted person to serve time in prison or on probation.

Read more about the criminal justice system.

https://brainly.com/question/10079130

#SPJ1

Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.

The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.

Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.

It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.

To know more about legal insanity

https://brainly.com/question/31445937

#SPJ11

George will get a deduction of $2 million/15 years, which is $133,333.33 per year over the next fifteen years.

Expenditure is referred to as money spent by the individual or business entity on buying goods.

When one company entity purchases another business entity or a commercial undertaking, there are a variety of costs associated with the transactions. Some of these charges can be deducted from your taxes, while others cannot.

According to tax regulations and legislation, section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code allows for the deduction of investigative costs related to company purchases as both an ordinary and necessary expense. The New York Yankee baseball team and the associated stadium are now in operation, hence the restrictions of section 195 will apply in this specific situation. According to section 195's guidelines, these costs must be depreciated over a 15-year period. In this case, the overall cost is $2 million, and George will not be able to get a deduction of the entire value of $2 million in that year itself.

Therefore, George Steinbrenner will get a deduction of $2 million/15 years.

Learn more about Expenditure, here;

https://brainly.com/question/30063968

#SPJ1

Code of Federal Regulations

Answer:

to have a law declared unconstitutional

Explanation:

Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.

Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.

Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her  and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.

Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Read more about Jane Roe case

brainly.com/question/10184794

Answer:

Duties to protect people in their cities, and to stop criminals from committing crimes; Such duties are;

True, when a statute is clearly designed to protect a certain class of people, a member of that class can enforce a contract in violation of the statute even though the other party cannot. This is known as the doctrine of "in pari delicto," which means "in equal fault."

Here is a step-by-step explanation:

1. Identify the statute: First, it's important to determine which specific statute is in question and whether it is designed to protect a certain class of people.

2. Determine the protected class: Next, identify the class of people that the statute aims to protect. This could be consumers, employees, or any other group specified by the law.

3. Analyze the contract: Review the terms of the contract to see if it violates the statute in question. If it does, then the contract is considered illegal.

4. Establish standing: Determine whether the person seeking to enforce the contract is a member of the protected class. If they are, then they have standing to enforce the contract despite its illegality.

5. Apply the doctrine of in pari delicto: Since the person enforcing the contract is a member of the protected class, the doctrine of in pari delicto allows them to enforce the contract even though the other party cannot.

This is because the purpose of the statute is to protect this specific class of people, and allowing them to enforce the contract serves that purpose.

In summary, when a statute is designed to protect a certain class of people, members of that class can enforce contracts in violation of the statute, even if the other party cannot.

This is because the doctrine of in pari delicto recognizes that the protected class should not be held to the same standard as the party violating the statute, as the law is intended to safeguard their interests.

To know more about pari delicto refer here: https://brainly.com/question/15095413#
#SPJ11

While starting a police chase, an officer also bears the duty of deciding when to terminate it. It may be determined for him by events or a higher power.

While in the chase, What do you do?

During the quest, this risk vs. return analysis should be ongoing. It's possible that the risks and conditions will change from one second to the next. Constantly reevaluating the situation may help to reduce danger and keep the officer focused and thinking logically rather than emotionally.

The police is relieved from having to take traffic density or congestion into account when a chase starts and continues on a mostly empty roadway. Sadly, chases frequently travel through locations with different levels of traffic congestion. The pursuit might shift from a rural route to the heart of the metropolis, or vice versa. The dynamics of an 80 mph chase on an open motorway differ from those on city surface streets.

To learn more about crime and murder:

https://brainly.com/question/13048126

#SPJ1

A systematic compilation of written law is best described as a code, also known as a legal code.

The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.

Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.

On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.

While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.

To know more about obligations.

https://brainly.com/question/32907342

#SPJ11

Answer:

Jurors

Explanation:

the victim in courts is the individual bringing charges against the defendant

the judge is the person who presides over the court

From the question given we evaluated statements concerning the recognition of traditional communities in South Africa, the discontinuation of courts of Traditional leaders, and the criminal liability of children under African customary law.

1. The statement is correct. Section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 provides that traditional communities must meet certain criteria to be recognized by the state. The Act specifies that traditional communities must have a distinct cultural identity, a traditional leader, and a system of governance that is recognized by the community members.

2. The statement is incorrect. The Constitution ofb recognizes traditional leadership and courts, and provides for their continued existence. Traditional leaders have a role to play in the administration of justice, and the Constitution recognizes their jurisdiction in certain areas.

3. The statement is incorrect. In terms of African customary law, a child can be held criminally liable for their actions. However, the age of criminal responsibility varies between different African countries and cultures. In South Africa, for example, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally liable, while children between the ages of 10 and 14 are presumed to lack criminal capacity unless it can be proved that they knew the wrongfulness of their actions.

Learn more on traditional governance here;

https://brainly.com/question/30374769

#SPJ1

Answer: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a major case challenging Environmental Protection Agency regulations of greenhouse

Explanation:

The activist advocate M.C. Mehra v/s. Union Of India AIR 1988 SCR (2) 583* filed a writ petition ordering the closure of a number of polluting tanneries near Kanpur.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal government agency established by the Nixon Administration to protect human health and the environment. The EPA develops and enforces environmental laws, inspects the environment, and provides technical assistance to reduce threats and aid in recovery planning.

Thus, The Court ruled that if the EPA wants to continue its inaction on carbon regulation, it must do so in accordance with the Act, which requires it to consider "whether greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change."

Learn more about Environmental Protection Agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/13055175

#SPJ2

False. Texas does not have a plural executive system. In Texas, the governor is the chief executive officer, and is the only one with the authority to appoint people to executive positions.

The governor has the power to appoint the heads of state departments, boards, and commissions, as well as to fill vacancies in the offices of lieutenant governor, attorney general, comptroller, commissioner of agriculture, and land commissioner.

The governor also has the authority to remove any appointed executive official. The governor can also veto bills passed by the legislature, and can call special sessions of the legislature when needed. The governor is assisted by the lieutenant governor and staff members, who can also appoint people to various executive posts.

Know more about executive system here

https://brainly.com/question/16601275#

#SPJ11

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

Based on the latest information from IRS on Health Savings Account (HSA), the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."

The IRS made the latest information for 2021 by stating that individuals aged 55 and below without family coverage under qualifying high-deductible health plans not less than $1,400 can contribute up to $3,600.

Therefore, given that Jack is not specified to have family coverage, it is assumed he is operating individual HSA. Also, since he is 45 years old, therefore, the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "$3,600."

Learn more about Health Savings Account here: https://brainly.com/question/3626279

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Ubuntu is the long tradition of african cultures where criminals or people that have done something wrong have to do right by the people they injured or hurt, and they have to help them healing the social tissue and restoring relationships in order to be able to go back into society.

It's a very close matter to rehabilitative justice, in the sense of wanting to restore the social tissue and helping the person get back to society as a good, productive and healthy member of the society, Ubuntu has proven to be a good method and state of mind when dealing with hurt societies by the narcotrafic and organized crime.

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

A key long-term effect of the carving up of China by European, Russian, and Japanese powers is the weakening of China's sovereignty and the rise of nationalist movements. This ultimately led to significant social and political changes within the country.

The carving up of China refers to the period during the late 19th and early 20th centuries when foreign powers such as Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Japan established spheres of influence and gained control over various parts of China.

This was primarily done through a series of unequal treaties, which forced China to give up significant portions of its territory and grant special privileges to these foreign powers.

As a result, China's sovereignty was weakened, and its political and economic systems were deeply affected. This led to widespread dissatisfaction among the Chinese population, who were frustrated by their government's inability to protect the country from foreign exploitation.

This dissatisfaction eventually gave rise to nationalist movements, such as the May Fourth Movement in 1919 and the subsequent formation of the Chinese Communist Party and the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang).

These nationalist movements played a crucial role in shaping China's modern history. They sought to reclaim China's lost territories, restore its sovereignty, and build a strong and independent nation. This eventually led to the Chinese Civil War, which ended with the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949.

In summary, a key long-term effect of the carving up of China by European, Russian, and Japanese powers was the weakening of China's sovereignty and the rise of nationalist movements. These movements ultimately led to significant social and political changes within the country, as well as the formation of the People's Republic of China.

To know more about China's sovereignty refer here: https://brainly.com/question/21879970#
#SPJ11