helpp
graph y +2 <-2/3x+4

De Morgan's laws state that ~(p∧q) is equivalent to ~p∨~q and ~(p∨q) is equivalent to ~p∧~q. Using this, we can rewrite the second statement ~(p∧q)→r as ~p∨~q→r.

Now, we can compare the two statements:

(~p∨~q)→r  and  ~p∨~q→r

To determine if they are equivalent, we need to see if they have the same truth value for every possible combination of truth values for p, q, and r.

Let's create a truth table to help us:

| p | q | r | ~p | ~q | ~p∨~q | (~p∨~q)→r | ~p∨~q | (~p∨~q)→r |
|---|---|---|----|----|--------|-------------|--------|-------------|
| T | T | T | F  | F  |   T    |      T      |   T    |      T      |
| T | T | F | F  | F  |   T    |      F      |   T    |      F      |
| T | F | T | F  | T  |   T    |      T      |   T    |      T      |
| T | F | F | F  | T  |   T    |      F      |   T    |      F      |
| F | T | T | T  | F  |   T    |      T      |   T    |      T      |
| F | T | F | T  | F  |   T    |      F      |   T    |      F      |
| F | F | T | T  | T  |   T    |      T      |   T    |      T      |
| F | F | F | T  | T  |   T    |      T      |   T    |      T      |

As we can see, both statements have the same truth value for every possible combination of truth values for p, q, and r. Therefore, the two statements are equivalent.

We used De Morgan's laws to rewrite ~(p∧q)→r as ~p∨~q→r, then we compared the two statements using a truth table to see if they have the same truth value for every possible combination of truth values for p, q, and r.

Learn more about truth table here:

brainly.com/question/30588184

#SPJ11

The total area of the composite figure is 228 sq cm

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The composite figure with 6 sides

The total area of the composite figure is the sum of the areas of the individual shapes

So, we have

Area = Area of Rectangle + Area of Rectangle

Using the above as a guide, we have the following equation

Area = 12 * 14 + (22 - 12) * 6

Evaluate the products

Area = 228

Hence, the total area of the figure is 228 sq cm

Read more about area at

brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

Answer:

x =3

hope this helped you

please mark as the brainliest (ㆁωㆁ)

The exact area of each hexagonal shape is 181.5sqrt(3) cm^2. Option B

To determine the exact area of each hexagonal shape formed by the equilateral triangles, we need to calculate the area of one equilateral triangle and then multiply it by the number of triangles that make up the hexagon.

The formula to calculate the area of an equilateral triangle is:

Area = (sqrt(3) / 4) * side^2

Given that the side of each tile measures 11 cm, we can substitute this value into the formula to find the area of one equilateral triangle:

Area = (sqrt(3) / 4) * (11 cm)^2

= (sqrt(3) / 4) * 121 cm^2

= 121sqrt(3) / 4 cm^2

Now, since the hexagon is formed by six equilateral triangles, we can multiply the area of one triangle by 6 to find the total area of the hexagon:

Hexagon Area = 6 * (121sqrt(3) / 4 cm^2)

= 726sqrt(3) / 4 cm^2

= 181.5sqrt(3) cm^2

Therefore, the exact area of each hexagonal shape is 181.5sqrt(3) cm^2.

The correct answer is B: 181.5√3 cm^2.

For more such questions on hexagonal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25907410

#SPJ8

Answer:

205 because 8.4% of 17.22 is 205

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

37 - 5^5 = 12

ANSWER = 12*C

Answer: \(y=-\frac{1}{2}x+6\)

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of the line segment is \(\frac{-1-7}{4-8}=2\).

The midpoint of the line segment is \(\left(\frac{4+8}{2}, \frac{-1+7}{2} \right)=(6, 3)\).

Thus, the equation is:

\(y-3=-\frac{1}{2}(x-6)\\\\y-3=-\frac{1}{2}x+3\\\\y=-\frac{1}{2}x+6\)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

i cant see answers help my insta is 813.caden

Answer:

y+1=4(x-2)

y=4x+11

8x-2y+6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Week 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Week 3 you are 7-5

Week 4 you are 10-6

Week 5 you are 13-7

Week 6 you are 16-8

16/8 = 2 so week 6 is your answer

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

By adding both the x and y coordinates individually and dividing them by two u get the mid point

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that y varies directly as x then the equation relating them is

y = kx ← k is the constant of variation

To find k use the condition y = 7 when x = 3 , then

7 = 3k ( divide both sides by 3 )

\(\frac{7}{3}\) = k

y = \(\frac{7}{3}\) x ← equation of variation

When x = 7 , then

y = \(\frac{7}{3}\) × 7 = \(\frac{49}{3}\)

The segment is a straight line that connects the two points C and D. We want to determine the distance between C and D. Looking at the given points, the x cordinates are 3 and 7. The y coordinates are 6 and - 3.

The first step is to determine the distance between the x coordinate. We can subtract the higher value from the lower value but we must take the absolute value. Therefore, the distance between the x coordinate is 3 - 7 = - 4. The absolute value is 4

The distance between the y coordinate would be 6 - - 3 = 9. The absolute value is 9

The next step is to find the square root of the sum of both distances. It becomes

The length of the segment is 9.85

Answer:

A =bh

Step-by-step explanation:

2 1/2 times 5 1/4 = 13.125

The probability that the quarterback completes his first pass on his 4th attempt is 0.44

The term probability in math is defined as the ratio of the number of outcomes in an exhaustive set of equally likely outcomes that produce a given event to the total number of possible outcomes

Here we have given that assume a quarterback completes 44% of his passes.

Here we have to convert the percentage into decimal form, then we get,

=> 44/100

When we divide it, then we get the probability that the quarterback completes his first pass on his 4th attempt is written as,

=> 0.44

To know more about probability here.

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

It is true, as The term "ecological correlation" refers to correlations based on rates or averages that frequently appear in political science or sociology and tend to exaggerate the significance of a link.

Correlations describe the connections between different variables. Strong, weak, positive, or negative expressions are all possible. 1 = Causation need not always follow from correlation. A statistical measure of the linear relationship between two variables is called correlation (that is, do they change at a constant rate). Without defining cause and effect, this is a common method for illustrating straightforward connections. To illustrate the connection between two quantitative variables, statistical language employs correlation. Additionally, we consider that this connection is linear. In other words, when one variable changes by a given amount, the other variable also changes by a fixed amount, but only by one unit.

The term "ecological correlation" refers to correlations based on rates or averages that frequently appear in political science or sociology and tend to exaggerate the significance of a link.

So, it is true.

To know more about correlation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30016867

#SPJ4

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

The time Billy should get up to be right on time for school is 6:52 am.

The formula to calculate the time Billy should get up to be right on time for school is as follows: Time Billy Should Get Up = School Start Time - (Time to Get Dressed + Time to Eat Breakfast + Time to Walk to School). In this case, the formula is: Time Billy Should Get Up = 8:35 am - (32 minutes + 13 minutes + 17 minutes). In order to solve this equation, first we must convert the minutes to hours. 32 minutes is equal to 0.53 hours and 13 minutes is equal to 0.22 hours. 17 minutes is equal to 0.28 hours. Thus, the formula is: Time Billy Should Get Up = 8:35 am - (0.53 hours + 0.22 hours + 0.28 hours). Now, we can solve for the time Billy should get up. 8:35 am minus 0.53 hours is 7:42 am. Then, 7:42 am minus 0.22 hours is 7:20 am. Finally, 7:20 am minus 0.28 hours is 6:52 am. Therefore, the time Billy should get up to be right on time for school is 6:52 am.

Learn more about time here:

https://brainly.com/question/28050940

#SPJ4

the cost of full coverage insurance in female in her 50s as a percentage of the same insurance in a male in his 30s if female cost $819. 73 and male cost $1192. 64  was $ 68.73

We have the insurance coverage amount for men of 30 years and for women of 50 years. Therefore, to find the percentage that represents the cost of coverage of the 50-year-old woman based on the cost of coverage of the man, we need to perform the following operation:

Xw= Cw/Cm * 100%

Where:

Cw: cost of coverage for a woman of 50 years.

Cm: coverage cost for a 30-year-old man.

Xw= 819.73/1192.64 *100%

    = 68.73

learn more about of percentage here

https://brainly.com/question/11941499

#SPJ4

We have to make a suspicion based on the given data. The standard deviations of the three bunches are not given within the address, so we cannot straightforwardly decide whether the condition of equal standard deviations is met. Be that as it may, ready to make a few taught surmises based on what we know almost each gather.

The primary gather, which did not think about, is likely to have a bigger change in scores than the other two bunches since understudies with shifting levels of arrangement and capacity took the test. Subsequently, we might anticipate the standard deviation of this group to be bigger than that of the other two bunches.

It is conceivable that the condition of rise to standard deviations isn't met. In case the condition of equal standard deviations isn't met, we may require to utilize an altered adaptation of ANOVA, such as Welch's ANOVA, which does not expect a rise in changes. 

To learn about standard deviations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ4

Answer:

9.6kg

Step-by-step explanation:

If the mean mass is 2.1 we can count the mass of these six pumpkins

the total mass of the pumpkins divided by the quantity of them is equal 2.1

TO find the mass multiply 2.1 by the quantity of them (6)

2.1*6=12.6 - the summary weight of six pumpkins

12.6-3=9.6 - the remainder after using the heaviest pumpkin

The estimated federal income tax withholding using the percentage method for the given scenario would be $1,940 + $1,680 = $3,620.

To calculate the federal income tax withholding using the percentage method, we need the specific tax rates and brackets for the given income level. The tax rates and brackets may vary depending on the tax year and filing status.

Since you mentioned using the pre-2020 Form W-4, I will assume you are referring to the 2019 tax year. In that case, I can provide an estimate based on the tax rates and brackets for that year.

For a married employee filing jointly in 2019, the federal income tax rates and brackets are as follows:

- 10% on taxable income up to $19,400

- 12% on taxable income between $19,401 and $78,950

- 22% on taxable income between $78,951 and $168,400

- 24% on taxable income between $168,401 and $321,450

- 32% on taxable income between $321,451 and $408,200

- 35% on taxable income between $408,201 and $612,350

- 37% on taxable income over $612,350

To calculate the federal income tax withholding, we need to determine the taxable income based on the employee's earnings and filing status. Assuming no other deductions or adjustments, the taxable income can be calculated as follows:

Taxable Income = Earnings - Standard Deduction - (Withholding Allowances * Withholding Allowance Value)

For the 2019 tax year, the standard deduction for a married couple filing jointly is $24,400, and the value of one withholding allowance is $4,200.

Using the given information of earning $62,000 and claiming 1 federal withholding allowance, we can calculate the taxable income:

Taxable Income = $62,000 - $24,400 - (1 * $4,200) = $33,400

Now we can apply the tax rates to determine the federal income tax withholding:

10% on the first $19,400 = $19,400 * 10% = $1,940

12% on the remaining $14,000 ($33,400 - $19,400) = $14,000 * 12% = $1,680

Therefore, the estimated federal income tax withholding using the percentage method for the given scenario would be $1,940 + $1,680 = $3,620.

To learn more about federal income tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/30200430

#SPJ4

Answer: r= -3

Next 3 terms following 54 are -162, 486, -1458

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

See image

Step-by-step explanation:

Use y = mx + b called the slope-intercept form of the equation because you can pick the slope and also the y-intercept right off this equation. If you know what to look for, the information is just right there waiting for you to see it.

The m is the slope, that is the number in front of the x.

The b is the y-intercept, that is the number added on at the end of the equation.

Answer:

The value of 9f(3) is 1683.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a compound function, so let's call it \(g\), where it is equal to:

\(g = 9*f(3)\)

To solve it, we need to find \(f(3)\) and apply it on the expression above, this is done below:

\(f(3) = 4*(3)^3 + 8*(3)^2 - 2*3 + 13\\f(3) = 4*27 + 8*9 - 6 + 13\\f(3) = 108 + 72 + 7\\f(3) = 187\\\)

Applying it on \(g\) we have:

\(g = 9*187 =1683\)

Answer:

1,863

Step-by-step explanation:

First thing to do here is to substitute 3 for the value of x

f(3) =4)3)^3 + 8(3)^2 -2(3) + 13

= 4(27) + 8(9) -6 + 13

= 108 + 72 + 7 = 207

we now multiply this result by 9

= 9 * 207 = 1,863

The system of equations have no solution, the correct option is A.

For a solution to be solution to a system, it must satisfy all the equations of that system, and as all points satisfying an equation are in their graphs, so solution to a system is the intersection of all its equation at single point(as we need common point, which is going to be intersection of course)(this can be one or many, or sometimes none)

Given;

-1/2x+1/2y=-1   (1)

x-y=2   (2)

Now, multiplying equation 1 by 2

-x+y=-2

y=-2+x

Substituting the value of y in equation 2

x+2-x=2

Therefore, the equation have no solution.

Learn more about finding the solution of equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/26254258

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The strength of a linear relationship between two variables is typically measured by the correlation coefficient (r) or the coefficient of determination (r^2). A value of r or r^2 closer to 1 indicates a stronger positive linear relationship, whereas a value closer to -1 indicates a stronger negative linear relationship. A value of r or r^2 closer to 0 indicates a weaker or no linear relationship.

Looking at the given regression equations and their correlation coefficients, the regression with the weakest linear relationship between x and y is Regression 3:

Regression 1: y = -5.8x - 6.5, r = -0.7621

Regression 2: y = 2.4x - 14.7, r = 0.809

Regression 3: y = -7.4x - 17.4, r = -0.233

Regression 4: y = -3.4x - 8.5, r = -0.6121

Regression 3 has the lowest absolute value of r (0.233), indicating the weakest or no linear relationship between x and y. Therefore, Regression 3 represents the weakest linear relationship between x and y among the given options.

Answer:

1600 readers

Step-by-step explanation:

80*100=8000

5*n=5n

8000/5=1600

n=1600

Answer:

x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

5x - 8 = 2x + 7

-2x       -2x

3x - 8 = 7

     +8   +8

3x = 15

÷3    ÷3

x = 5

I hope this helps!

Answer:

  4√(3π) ft ≈ 12.28 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The formulas for volume of a cone and a cylinder can be used to find the radius of the silo. Then the formula for the circumference of a circle can be used to find the circumference.

__

Relevant formulas are ...

__

The total volume of the silo is the sum of the volumes of a cylinder of height (15 -6) = 9 ft, and a cone of height 6 ft. Both have the same radius: r. The total volume is given as 132 ft³.

  V = πr²h + 1/3πr²h' . . . . . . h = cylinder height, h' = cone height

  132 ft³ =  πr²(9 ft +1/3(6 ft)) = πr²(11 ft)

  r² = 132 ft³/(11π ft) = 12/π ft²

  r = √(12/π) ft = 2√(3/π) ft

Then the circumference of the silo is ...

  C = 2πr = 2π(2√(3/π)) ft = 4√(3π) ft ≈ 12.28 ft

The circumference of the base of the silo is 4√(3π), about 12.28 feet.