HELP!!!!!How do you think cell phones affect attention in class? Describe an experiment you could perform to test your hypothesis. Include your hypothesis, operational definitions of your independent and dependent variables, who your participants would be, and how you would randomly assign them to experimental or control groups.

Answer:

The pronouns I, me, my

Details about sherman's march

Explanation:

as you may know, a letter is a manuscript that establishes interpersonal communication. The writer of a letter is telling about something personal about him, an experience, a memory, a feeling among others. In this case, it is correct that in a letter, the writer uses the pronouns "I", "me", "my". In addition, if the writer is on his way to Sherman, it is likely that he is participating in sherman's march and tell details of that experience in his letter.

Answer: Single-resource Economy: At greater risk for economic decline, save costs associated with developing many industries

Diversified Economy: Provide more opportunities

for financial security, provide greater variety in

employment opportunities.

Explanation: Just took the test on Edmentum and passed!

According to Kennedy, the ability to monitor weapons should be shared by the leaders of all nations.

President John F. Kennedy calls for antagonistic nations to develop suggestions that will enable arms control and inspections and bring the capability to kill other nations under the entire control of all nations in his 1961 inauguration address. His inauguration speech, which would characterize his presidency during a period of economic boom, burgeoning changes in society, and diplomatic difficulties, covered the key topics of his campaign. Kennedy made the case that a concentration on weaponry should be substituted with a concentrate on international relations and aiding the underprivileged of the world by highlighting the recently found hazards of nuclear power and the escalating arms race.

Learn more about Kennedy here:

https://brainly.com/question/1577421

#SPJ4

Feudalism, the dominant social, political, and economic system in Medieval Europe, can be seen as providing a certain level of stability during that time period. However, its success in achieving social, political, and economic stability varied across different regions and over time.

1. Social Stability: Feudalism established a hierarchical social structure in which individuals had clearly defined roles and responsibilities. The feudal system provided a sense of order and stability within local communities, as people knew their place in society and their obligations to their lords. However, this stability was accompanied by rigid social classes and limited social mobility, which created significant inequalities and limited opportunities for advancement for the lower classes.

2. Political Stability: Feudalism provided a decentralized system of governance, with power dispersed among local lords and vassals. The lord-vassal relationship created a web of personal loyalties and obligations, which contributed to a level of political stability within individual territories. However, this decentralized structure often resulted in fragmentation and conflicts among lords, leading to frequent disputes and power struggles. Overall, while feudalism provided some stability at a local level, it often lacked a centralized authority capable of maintaining broader political stability.

3. Economic Stability: Feudalism's manorial system, with the lord's estate as the center of economic activity, aimed to provide self-sufficiency and stability in agricultural production. Serfs worked the land in exchange for protection and the right to use a portion of the produce. This system contributed to the subsistence of local communities but limited economic growth and innovation. The lack of trade and economic mobility hindered overall economic development and prosperity.

In summary, feudalism provided a certain level of social, political, and economic stability in Medieval Europe, but it was also accompanied by significant limitations and drawbacks. While it established social order and local governance, it perpetuated inequalities and limited social mobility. Additionally, its decentralized political structure and agricultural focus hindered broader political stability and economic growth. Over time, feudalism gave way to more centralized systems of governance and economic organization as societies evolved.

To read more about Medieval Europe click here

https://brainly.com/question/1383468

#SPJ11

Answer:

The first 2

Explanation:

Answer:

e

Explanation:

eeeeeeeeeeeee

Answer:

to prevent tyranny

Explanation:

Answer:

I am writing regarding the case about Will Anthony’s stolen gardening tools. I believe that  

Matthew Farmer was the perpetrator of the crime of stealing Will Anthony’s gardening tools. The

most reliable piece of evidence leading me to believe that is Will Anthony’s diary, a primary  

source, which was made for Will Anthony to write down what was happening in his life. The  

diary states on February 10th that Matthew had told him that his family was having a hard time  

earning money and tending to their crops. Gardening tools were expensive back in their day and

many people would have to steal the tools because they couldn’t afford to buy them, like  

Matthew since he was having trouble with money. By stealing the tools, he could tend to his  

crops for things like food and other necessities.  

The least reliable piece of evidence/information in the case was the sales journal, a primary  

source, where all the store transactions were recorded by Matthew Farmer. We know that it was

written by Matthew Farmer, but it doesn’t give us any evidence pointing toward him or the other  

suspect.

Hope this helps ;)

Please mark me brainliest, I worked on this a hour for you. :( yw

On February 28th, 1755, there was a report from Will Anthony about his gardening tools, and that they were stolen from the blacksmith shop. With the leads that have been gathered, I have come to the conclusion that Matthew Farmer is the one responsible for this sudden disappearance. A very trustworthy source is Will’s journal, where he writes down things that have happened in his life. A few weeks earlier, Matthew told Will that his family was having a hard time with their crops. Gardening tools were pricey in old times, which would lead to many cases of theft. I have come to believe Matthew has stolen the tools for his own good.

A very untrustworthy source would be the newspaper. News Journalists don’t get there on time, therefore they will less likely have the full and accurate story.

Still, give the man above me a brainliest for his hard work.

Answer:

h m m m i'm not really sure to be honest.but i feel like we should open up more to third parties because they rarely win and i feel like there's more good people i'm not really sure.right now?maybe.both trump and Biden aren't good in ways so yeah.third parties should have a chance to speak

Explanation:

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an anti-Semitic text created in Russia in the early 1900s, purporting to be an account of a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world. It has been used to promote hatred and violence against Jews for more than a century and continues to be referenced in various anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today.

The Protocols were widely disseminated in Europe in the early 1900s and were used to justify discrimination and violence against Jews. It was also used to support various anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, such as the idea that Jews were responsible for the outbreak of World War I. It has been used to promote hatred and violence against Jews for more than a century and continues to be referenced in various anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today.

It is a fabricated document that purports to be an account of a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world. It was created to stir up hatred towards Jews and to promote the idea that Jews were behind all of the world’s problems.

To learn more about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion :

brainly.com/question/26205450

Answer:

Explanation:

Life was very regimented, controlled and monotonous and all inmates wore uniforms. They rarely received visitors and could not leave unless they were formally discharged to find or take up work and provide for themselves.

Patriots, also known as Revolutionaries, Continentals, Rebels, or American Whigs, were the colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America an independent nation in July 1776.

Many Patriots were active before 1775 in groups such as the Sons of Liberty, and the most prominent leaders are referred to today by Americans as the Founding Fathers. They represented a cross-section of the population of the Thirteen Colonies and came from many different backgrounds.

According to Robert Calhoon, between 40 and 45 percent of the white population in the Thirteen Colonies supported the Patriots' cause, between 15 and 20 percent supported the Loyalists, and the remainder were neutral or kept a low profile. The great majority of the Loyalists remained in America, while the minority went to Canada, Britain, Florida, or the West Indies.

learn more about the patriot revolution at -

brainly.com/question/24715256

the term alignment means when you align something

Option (A), Slavery increased within africa to provide labor for commercial crops such as palm oil and peanuts, is the correct answer.  

             Slave Trade took place across the Atlantic ocean, beginning from the Western coast of Europe where goods were brought to the Western part of Africa. Slaves were then shipped to the North America and were traded with goods, which were then brought back to Europe.

Thus, the ban was considered illegitimate only in the eyes of Europeans, while continued within the continent.  West Africans found it comfortable to focus on producing commodities like palm oil and peanuts, by using native slaves. The slave trade within the continent thus continued.

       The so- called triangular trade ended after the middle of the nineteenth century, as the terms of trade changed and so the fate of the slaves.

Learn more about Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: https://brainly.com/question/25873490

#SPJ4

Answer:

tipu sultan did on May 4, 1799

Answer:May 4, 1799

Explanation:

Answer:

Written arguments, oral arguments, conference, opinion writings, and announcement.

Explanation:

Answer:

Where's the picture??

Explanation:

I need the picture so I can help you

The passage one is a praise of Roman values and behavior. The passage two is also a praise of Roman values and behavior. The passage three is a critique of Roman values and behavior. Explanation: The passage one is a praise of Roman values and behavior because the passage describes how each part of the Roman government is enabled to either assist or obstruct other parts of the government. The passage praises the Roman government and it claims that it is impossible to invent a more perfect system.

Therefore, the passage one is a praise of Roman values and behavior. The passage two is also a praise of Roman values and behavior because it is written in such a way that it praises the Roman ruler for the power that he has over all peoples. The passage encourages the Roman ruler to use his power for the good of his people. Therefore, the passage two is a praise of Roman values and behavior.

The passage three is a critique of Roman values and behavior because it describes how men and women in Rome have lost all sense of modesty and have become too indulgent in their behavior. The passage highlights the negative aspects of Roman society and values. Therefore, the passage three is a critique of Roman values and behavior.

Learn more about values

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

Answer:

The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make their own political decisions. The idea of democracy has been unequivocally upheld by countries like the United States and Great Britain through centuries.Nov 8, 2019

Explanation:

The idea of democracy has been unequivocally upheld by countries like the United States and Great Britain through centuries.

The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make their own choices about the type of government they want to live under.

The Charter outlined the ideal outcomes of the conflict: no territorial expansion, no unauthorized territorial changes, self-determination, the restoration of self-government to those who had lost it, a relaxation of trade restrictions, and international cooperation to ensure better economic and social conditions.

It declared openly the United States and Great Britain's sentiment of unity against Axis aggression. It outlined President Roosevelt's Wilsonian-inspired plan for the postwar era, one that would emphasize self-determination, collective security, disarmament, and more open trade.

Learn more about the Atlantic Charter here:

https://brainly.com/question/20515280

#SPJ7

Answer: The Bantu people are an African indigenous group. They began in central Africa and expanded to other regions of the continent. This varied group today lives in Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa and speaks Bantu languages.

Answer:

Bantu people are the speakers of Bantu languages, comprising several hundred indigenous ethnic groups in Africa, spread over a vast area from Central Africa across the African Great Lakes to Southern Africa.

hope this helps :) !!!

Answer:

U.S. victory in the war produced a peace treaty that compelled the Spanish to relinquish claims on Cuba, and to cede sovereignty over Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the United States. The United States also annexed the independent state of Hawaii during the conflict

Hope this helps you

Answer:

U.S. victory in the war produced a peace treaty that compelled the Spanish to relinquish claims on Cuba, and to cede sovereignty over Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the United States.  

Although the argument in Document D is against the war with Mexico, what may have surprised some of today's readers is the fact that the author, Henry David Thoreau, was an outspoken advocate for civil disobedience and nonviolent resistance.

This document reveals Thoreau's deep conviction that it is the duty of every citizen to resist unjust government actions, even if it means breaking the law. This is a radical idea that challenges the traditional notion of obedience to authority, which is still a deeply ingrained cultural value in many societies today.

Moreover, Thoreau's argument goes beyond the immediate issue of the war with Mexico and raises questions about the role of government in society and the limits of individual liberty. He argues that a government that engages in unjust actions, such as the war with Mexico, forfeits its legitimacy and the allegiance of its citizens. This is a powerful critique that continues to resonate with many people today, especially in light of ongoing debates about government power and the rights of individuals.

To know more about civil disobedience click this link-

brainly.com/question/29553069

#SPJ11

Answer:

Bro Frrrrr like come on already

Answer:

No, it would have caused greater backlash by the British

Explanation: