HELP!!

did the principle of separation of powers assist or hinder reconstruction?? explain

In Russia, efforts to build communism began after Tsar Nicholas II lost his power during the February Revolution, which started in 1917, and ended with the dissolution of the USSR in 1991. In 1922, the Communist Reds were victorious and formed the Soviet Union, making Russia communist.

Hope this helps!

The nationalist movements in the Ottoman Empire were a significant factor in the independence or self-rule for many territories. This movement began during the last years of the Ottoman Empire and gained momentum during World War I. the correct answer is option (B).

However, the victorious Allied forces managed to occupy its capital, which further intensified the nationalist movement, leading to the establishment of the Republic of Turkey.The nationalist movements were driven by the desire for self-rule and the preservation of cultural identity. Many territories within the Ottoman Empire, such as Greece, Bulgaria, and Serbia, sought independence and gained it through nationalist movements.Hence, the right answer is option (B).

The movement was successful in creating new independent states, as well as self-rule for territories such as Palestine and Iraq.The establishment of the Republic of Turkey was a significant development in the nationalist movement, as it marked the end of the Ottoman Empire and the beginning of a new era. The movement's success in creating independent states and self-rule for territories had a significant impact on the political and cultural landscape of the region, shaping it into what it is today.

To know more about nationalist movement  click here

brainly.com/question/990796

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is C. raise farm prices

Explanation:

the answer is C. raise farm prices

Answer:

C. raise farm prices

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question has no options, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown versus Board of Education of Topeka 1954 the separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Public response to this decision demonstrates that equal opportunity in education was legal in the United States and that white and black boys could attend school in peace, with no racial segregation issues. After so much struggle and activism form parents, activists, and lawyers, the Supre Court decided that it was unconstitutional to maintain racial segregation in public education.

Conservative- The government should be led by a monarch with legitimacy from God. The government should maintain stability through a social class system.

Liberals believe that people should be able to climb the social ladder. The government should place a strong emphasis on the rights guaranteed by the constitution.

For more info about 'Conservative' click on this brainly link - https://brainly.com/question/743663

#SPJ4

Answer:mb cuz im tryna get more answers my self

Explanation:

s

i dont know it but do u? bc i need it

The consequences of modern warfare are manifold, and it affects every single stratum of mankind, whether it be social, cultural, political or economic.

The consequences of war can be either long- or short-lasting and are widely dispersed. Soldiers' perspectives on war differ from those of civilians. Even though both sides suffer during a war, atrocities are particularly committed against women and children. Up to two million people killed in armed conflicts in the last ten years were children. Another legacy of these conflicts is the widespread trauma brought on by these atrocities and the suffering of the civilian population, which leads to significant emotional and psychological stress. Nowadays, internal conflicts often cause more harm to civilians than external conflicts. This is a result of the growing trend among combatants to strategically target civilians. Mass city destruction and long-lasting effects on a nation's economy are also consequences of war.

Social Effect of War - Forced migration or displacement occurs most frequently during times of war and can be harmful to both the community and an individual. When a war breaks out, a lot of people flee their homes out of fear for their lives and the lives of their families, which causes them to lose their way either internally or externally.

Cultural assets are at risk of being destroyed, taken away, looted, and robbed during a war. Archaeological artefacts, excavation sites, archives, and museums are examples of cultural heritage that are damaged by combatants to fund the conflict.

Health Effect of War- Women and men are negatively impacted by conflict, which frequently leads to gender-specific challenges that are not acknowledged or addressed by the majority population around the world. Because they are more probable to die from indirect causes than direct causes, women are affected differently by war.

Economic Effect of War -The effects of war on the economy could be devastating both during and after the conflict.  A community's or nation's regular activities are interfered with, and possible property damage results.

The labour force is impacted in many different ways, but it is most frequently impacted by the severe loss of life, changes in population, the shrinking labour force due to the influx of refugees and displacement, and the destruction of infrastructure, which in turn leads to a decline in productivity.

Read more about the consequences of war on

https://brainly.com/question/794997

Answer:

it is quite hard to understand

Explanation:

The fact that is left out of this account, and most clearly suggests bias, is option A. The governor supported the law, but the law was passed before she became governor.

By omitting this crucial piece of information, the account creates a biased narrative that blames the governor for the perceived problem of the increasing number of deer in state parks. The statement implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the governor's support of the law against hunting and the current situation, suggesting that her actions directly led to the "price" the state is now paying.

However, if it were mentioned that the law was already in place before the governor assumed office, it would provide a different context and undermine the implicit criticism of the governor's decision. It would highlight that the governor's support of the existing law was not the direct cause of the perceived problem, as she did not have control over its enactment.

Including this omitted information would present a more balanced account, allowing readers to consider other factors that may have contributed to the increase in the deer population. It would encourage a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and prevent the reader from forming a biased judgment solely based on the information provided. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

know more about judgment here:

https://brainly.com/question/730438

#SPJ8

The leaders of Israel mentioned in the search results include patriarchs, judges, kings, prophets, and religious figures such as John the Baptist and Jesus.

Abraham: one of the first "patriarchs" and a man centric head of Israel.

Joshua: a head of Israel who succeeded Moses and drove the Israelites into the Guaranteed Land.

Judges: a time of Israel's set of experiences wherein the country was driven by a progression of judges, including Samson, Deborah, Gideon, and Jephthah.

Samuel: an adjudicator and prophet of Israel who blessed Saul as ruler and later blessed David as lord.

Saul: the principal lord of Israel, blessed by Samuel, who was subsequently dismissed by God.

David: the second lord of Israel, who laid out Jerusalem as the capital of the Unified Realm of Israel and was known for his tactical triumphs and his job in laying out the Sanctuary in Jerusalem.

John: otherwise called John the Baptist, a prophet who arranged the way for Jesus

Blanket: a reference to the Essence of God, who was guaranteed by Jesus to his followers.

Jesus: the organizer behind Christianity, who is accepted by Christians to be the Child of God and the Savior.

Learn more about on Jesus, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30164408

#SPJ1

Answer:

During the Great Depression Herbert Hoover opted for a "laissez-faire" policy with respect to the economy, meaning he believed the system of capitalism would self-correct and bounce back from devastation after the Stock Market crash of 1929 and the subsequent recession. Hoover felt that financial aid from the government would encourage people to stop working and was therefore against the develop of social services and public funds as a solution. In fact, Hoover championed the concept of "trickle down" economics, a theory that holds that the prosperity of big business and banks would trickle down to the average American because, according to him and his advisors, they would create more jobs, increase consumerism and expand production.  To facilitate this trickle-down economics plan he cut taxes for those with higher incomes. His response failed because the tax cuts for the rich simply translated to even more wealth for the wealthy, further spurring income inequality. The average American did not receive bailouts or tax breaks, bur rather was the victim of a government that was not prepared to handle such a crisis. Shanty towns developed quickly as millions of Americans suffered at the hands of insufficient crisis relief and will forever be remembered as being named after the sitting president who watched the country collapse and did little to stop it: they were called "Hoovervilles".

Explanation:

Answer:

As such, some form of water that moved was preferable. For this reason, many of the greatest early civilizations, such as the Egyptians and the Sumerians, developed near rivers. In some cases, such as the Nile in Egypt, a river could also bring nutrients for the soil, meaning that better crops could be grown.

Explanation:

hope this helps

please brainliest

Answer: C

Explanation:

Answer:

Many wealthy plantation owners relied on enslaved people to grow crops like cotton and sugar. The economy was largely based on agriculture and slave labor. Socially, there was a divide between the wealthy planters and the poor white farmers. Additionally, the state's location on the Mississippi River made it an important transportation and trade center.

In reading three different stories about immigrants' experiences, it becomes evident that despite arriving in America through different stations, these immigrants shared common qualities. Two examples of these shared qualities include resilience and determination.

Resilience: The stories highlighted how these immigrants faced various challenges and hardships but displayed remarkable resilience in navigating their new lives. They exhibited a strong ability to adapt to unfamiliar surroundings, overcome obstacles, and persevere in the face of adversity. Whether it was language barriers, discrimination, or economic hardships, these immigrants showed resilience in their pursuit of a better life for themselves and their families.

Determination: Another shared quality among these immigrants was their unwavering determination to succeed and create a better future. They were driven by a deep sense of ambition and a desire to improve their circumstances. Despite the difficulties they encountered, these immigrants displayed a relentless work ethic, embracing opportunities for education, employment, and entrepreneurship. Their determination propelled them forward, enabling them to overcome challenges and achieve their goals in their new homeland.

These shared qualities of resilience and determination illustrate the common traits that many immigrants bring to their journey of seeking a better life in America. Their stories inspire and remind us of the remarkable strength and determination that individuals possess when faced with new and unfamiliar circumstances.

for more questions on immigrants

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

#SPJ8

By declaring such exclusionary practices unconstitutional, these rulings helped pave the way for African Americans to exercise their right to vote and have a say in the democratic process.

One Supreme Court decision that increased access for African American Texans to participate in primary elections is Smith v. Allwright. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled in 1944 that the exclusion of African Americans from participating in primary elections, which were the key determinant of electoral success in the South, violated their rights under the Fifteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The decision effectively invalidated the white primary system that had been used to disenfranchise African American voters.
Another significant Supreme Court decision is Terry v. Adams, also known as the "Jaybird Case." This case, decided in 1953, held that the Jaybird Association's primary elections in Texas, which excluded African American voters, were unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that these racially discriminatory practices violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
These landmark decisions played a crucial role in dismantling racial barriers in Texas and improving access for African Americans to participate in primary elections. By declaring such exclusionary practices unconstitutional, these rulings helped pave the way for African Americans to exercise their right to vote and have a say in the democratic process.

learn more about democratic process

https://brainly.com/question/16236419

#SPJ11

Answer:

Johnson tasked state and local governments with creating work training programs for up to 200,000 men and women. A national work study program was also established to offer 140,000 Americans the chance to go to college who could otherwise not afford it.

Other initiatives the so-called War on Poverty offered were:

                                      -More Info If Needed-

Johnson knew battling poverty wouldn’t be easy. Still, he said, “…this program will show the way to new opportunities for millions of our fellow citizens. It will provide a lever with which we can begin to open the door to our prosperity for those who have been kept outside.”

The Head Start program started as an eight-week summer camp run by the Office of Economic Opportunity for 500,000 children ages three to five. Since the program’s inception, it has served over 32 million vulnerable children in America.

Many Great Society programs fell under the War on Poverty umbrella.

I hope this helped please mark me brainliest!!

- Good Luck

Due to the severe constraints on voting and political activism in American colonial times, these practices closely reflected the political history of North America's dominant colonial founders, who were primarily English.

What were the Seven Years War's most notable results, and how did it ultimately pave the way for the American Revolution?

As a result of the war, Great Britain gained a sizable amount of territory in North America, but tensions about enforcing frontier policies and how to pay for the war's expenses ultimately fuelled colonial discontent and fuelled the American Revolution.

What was one of the objectives of the Texas Presidio system?

A mission was shielded by a presidio. Forts known as presidios provided protection from hostile American Indians. The American Indians in the missions were also under their control. Presidio soldiers apprehended escaping American Indians.

To know more about American colonial voting visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14866939

#SPJ4

Athenian democracy and the system of government in the USA have significant differences in their structures. We need to do a structured research in books, articles and historical documents about both to compare such democracies.

In relation to citizenship and franchise, in Athens, only adult male citizens who were born in Athens or had undergone naturalization were eligible to participate in democracy. In contrast, the USA allows citizens who are at least 18 years old to vote, regardless of their gender, race, or country of origin.

The procedure to make laws and who had the power to do so, in Athens, the Assembly of citizens had the power to make laws and policies. In the USA, the power to make laws is divided between the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the President.

The Power of the Judiciary, in Athens, there was no separate judiciary, and the Assembly acted as the final court of appeal. In contrast, the USA has a separate judiciary, with the power to interpret and enforce the law.

The concept of judicial review, which allows the judiciary to declare acts of the legislature or executive as unconstitutional, is not present in Athenian democracy. In the USA, the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review.

Ways of Constraining the power of public officials, in Athens, the officials were selected randomly by lot, and they held their positions for a limited time. In contrast, in the USA, officials are elected by the people, and they hold their positions for a fixed term.

Therefore, Athenian democracy and the system of government in the USA have significant differences in their structures, such as citizenship and franchise, lawmaking procedures, the power of the judiciary, and ways of constraining the power of public officials.

Find out more about Athenian democracy at:

https://brainly.com/question/16736339

#SPJ1

First Manassas is known as the Great Ski Daddle. So, option A is accurate.

"First Manassas" is the common name for the First Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, during the American Civil War. It was the Confederate side's first significant win in the war. "Great Ski Daddle" is a humorous and colloquial term used to refer to the battle, but it is not an official or widely recognized term. The other options, Antietam, Gettysburg, and Cold Harbor, are other major battles that took place during the American Civil War, but they are not associated with the term "Great Ski Daddle."

To know more about First Manassas

brainly.com/question/1674472

#SPJ11

The actual question is:

Fill in the blank,

_____________ is known as the Great Ski Daddle.

A) First Manassas

B) Antietam

C) Gettysburg

D) Cold Harbor

Answer: Natural gas, petroleum, steel, and farming !

Explanation:

The entity that devised the original living will in 1967 was the Euthanasia Society of America. The living will is a legal document that specifies an individual's preferences for medical treatment in case they become unable to make their own decisions due to an injury, illness, or other incapacitation.

The living will was first proposed by attorney Luis Kutner in 1967 as part of his effort to allow people to die with dignity. The Euthanasia Society of America, later renamed the Society for the Right to Die, created the first living will form that same year to help individuals record their end-of-life care preferences and provide guidance to their healthcare providers.

In 1976, California was the first state to pass a living will statute, and now all states in the United States have some form of living will laws that authorize the use of living wills.

Know more about  living will:

https://brainly.com/question/29153181

#SPJ11

The Euthanasia Society of America devised the original living will in 1967. Living wills, part of advance directives, outline a person's wishes for medical interventions if they're unable to communicate. They often include a DNR order and health care proxy.

In 1967, the original living will was devised by an entity known as the Euthanasia Society of America. The concept of a living will came about with the increasing sophistication of medical procedures and the ability to prolong life, which led to ethical and personal considerations about quality of life and self-determination in medical decisions.

Living wills, as part of larger advance directives, allow individuals to specify what kind of medical interventions they would like in the event that they are unable to express their desires - including in their terminal stages. An example of this could be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, declaring that medical personnel should not take steps to revive or resuscitate the patient if their heart or breathing stops.

Health care proxies are also often included in living wills to assign a designated person to make medical decisions in the event of incapacitation. Understanding and implementing these legal instruments appropriately often raises ongoing debates, with respect to both personal wishes and legal implications.

https://brainly.com/question/35553342

#SPJ6

Answer:

The Puritans remained within the church, hoping to reform it.

Explanation:

The "Puritans" were members of Puritanism. They were Protestants who wanted to reform the Church of England in order to purify it. They believe God gave them such purpose. Their movement was centered on not becoming like the Roman Catholic Church. They wanted the Church of England to remove practices that cannot be found in the Bible.

This is the reason why some of the Puritans remained within the church while others separated from it. Unlike the Pilgrims, the Puritans were non-separatists while the Pilgrims were separatists.

Answer:

Printing production became more efficient.  Newspapers and Magazines became more affordable. Double sided printing did not become available till 1987.

Explanation:

Only with the allied invasion of Normandy did American troops assume a major presence in European combat was not a feature of American involvement in World War II.

The attack on Pearl Harbor did shock a reluctant nation into entering the war, but this was not a feature of American involvement. In 1941, President Roosevelt agreed to a wartime alliance with the Soviet Union, in part because Stalin promised to rid his country of Communism after the war. This was also not a feature of American involvement in the war.

Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was based in part on a fear that hundreds of thousands of Americans might otherwise die in a land war. This was a major feature of American involvement in World War II. The allied invasion of Normandy was the first major presence of American troops in Europe and was the largest amphibious invasion in history. This was an important feature of American involvement in the war. However, it was not the only feature of American involvement in World War II.

The American involvement in the war was not limited to only the invasion of Normandy. Other features of American involvement in the war included the dropping of atomic bombs, the strategic and material support for the Allies, and the mobilization of troops and resources on a global scale. This support helped to secure the Allied victory in World War II.

Know more about World War II here :

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ11

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Answer:

21 D

22 A

23 B

I am not entirely sure tho.