HELP PLEASE I WILL NARK BRAINLIEST

Answer:

182,490

      x60

_______

10949400

Answer:

10949400

Step-by-step explanation:

if you break it down into it units you will have 100 thousands, 80 thousands, 2 thousands, 4 hundreds, 9 tens, and 0 ones now if we do 60 times each one of theses uints we would get  6000 thousands, 4800 thousands, 120 thousand, 24 hundreds, 54 tens, and 0 ones add these all together and you would get 10,949,400 :))

Answer:1200

Step-by-step explanation:

have no time sorry

(a) The series Σ (3n + 4)/(2n^2 + 3n + 5) is absolutely convergent.
(b) The series Σ cos(na)/(n^2 + ln(n)) is absolutely convergent.
(c) The series Σ (-1)^n * ln(n) is conditionally convergent.

(a) To determine the convergence of the series Σ(3n + 4)/(2n^2 + 3n + 5), we can use the Ratio Test. The Ratio Test states that if the limit as n approaches infinity of |a_(n+1)/a_n| is less than 1, the series converges absolutely. If the limit is greater than 1, the series diverges. If the limit equals 1, the test is inconclusive.

In this case, we find the limit as n approaches infinity of |((3(n+1) + 4)/(2(n+1)^2 + 3(n+1) + 5))/((3n + 4)/(2n^2 + 3n + 5))|. After simplifying and finding the limit, we see that it is 0, which is less than 1. Therefore, the series converges absolutely.

(b) For the series Σ cos(na)/(n^2 + ln(n)), we can use the Comparison Test. We compare the given series with the series Σ 1/(n^2). Since cos(na) is between -1 and 1, the series is smaller than Σ 1/(n^2) in absolute terms. Since Σ 1/(n^2) converges (it is a p-series with p = 2, which is greater than 1), the given series also converges absolutely.

(c) For the series Σ (-1)^n * ln(n), we can use the Alternating Series Test. This test states that if the terms are decreasing in magnitude and approaching zero, then the series is conditionally convergent.

In this case, ln(n) is a decreasing function for n ≥ 1, and the limit as n approaches infinity of ln(n) is 0. Therefore, the series is conditionally convergent.

To learn more about : absolutely

https://brainly.com/question/29139100

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. 210 m³

2. 320 in³

3. 189 m³

4. 150 cm³

5. 576 ft³

6. 240 m³

7. 220 cm²

8. 150 ft²

9. 132 in²

10. 592 m²

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = l × w × h

Area = 2 (wl + hl + hw)

Volume is always cubed.(³)

Area is always squared (²)

Plug it in.

Answer:

If your shape is a regular polygon (such as a square in the example above) then it is only necessary to measure one side as, by definition, the other sides of a regular polygon are the same length. It is common to use tick marks to show that all sides are an equal length.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps love form india server

Answer:

they usually have double line on top of the lines of the shapes. for example square they have all the same lenght so they have double line signs on top of them

i hope this help. good luck

Answer:

23

Step-by-step explanation:

find 10% = 4

quadruple it = 16

half 10% = 2

half it again = 1

2.5% = 1

40% = 16

1 + 16 = 17

take 17 off of 40 = 23

Answer:

36h-36

Step-by-step explanation:

you have to use distributive law/rule

12×3h=36h

12×3=36

36h-36

The price per T-shirt should be at least $15 to achieve a profit of $250.

To calculate the price per T-shirt that will yield a profit of at least $250, we need to consider the cost of production, the desired profit, and the number of shirts to be sold.

Given that the cost to make each T-shirt is $10, and we want to sell 50 shirts, the total cost of production would be 10 * 50 = $500.

Now, let's calculate the minimum revenue needed to achieve a profit of $250. We add the desired profit to the total cost of production: $500 + $250 = $750.

Finally, to determine the price per T-shirt, we divide the total revenue by the number of shirts: $750 ÷ 50 = $15.

Therefore, to make a profit of at least $250, the price per T-shirt should be set at $15.

By selling each T-shirt for $15, the total revenue would be $15 * 50 = $750. From this revenue, we subtract the total production cost of $500 to calculate the profit, which amounts to $750 - $500 = $250. Thus, by charging $15 per T-shirt, the desired profit of $250 is achieved.

For more question on profit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30495119

#SPJ8

Answer:

If you're trying to find the area of the fabric it would be 13*358 or 4654 square yards of fabric.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the area you have to multiply the length by the width. In this case, it's 13*358, which the area equals to 4654 square feet.

Answer:

553

Step-by-step explanation:

The product of the volume and total surface area of the given right conical frustum is approximately 146520π². To find the product of the volume and total surface area of a right conical frustum, we first need to determine the individual values of volume and surface area.

The volume of a frustum can be calculated using the formula:

V = (1/3)πh(r₁² + r₂² + r₁r₂),

where h is the height of the frustum, r₁ and r₂ are the radii of the larger and smaller bases, respectively.

In this case, we are given that the radii of the larger and smaller bases are 12 and 9 units, respectively. We also know that the two bases are 4 units apart, which means the height of the frustum is 4 units.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we have:

V = (1/3)π(4)(12² + 9² + 12*9)

 = (1/3)π(4)(144 + 81 + 108)

 = (1/3)π(4)(333)

 = (4/3)π(333)

 ≈ 444π cubic units

Now, let's move on to calculating the total surface area of the frustum. The formula for the total surface area is:

A = π(r₁ + r₂)ℓ + πr₁² + πr₂²,

where ℓ is the slant height of the frustum.

Since the frustum is a right frustum, the slant height ℓ can be found using the Pythagorean theorem:

ℓ = √(h² + (r₁ - r₂)²)

Substituting the given values, we have:

ℓ = √(4² + (12 - 9)²)

 = √(16 + 9)

 = √25

 = 5

Now we can calculate the total surface area:

A = π(12 + 9)(5) + π(12²) + π(9²)

 = π(21)(5) + π(144) + π(81)

 = 105π + 144π + 81π

 = 330π square units

Finally, to find the product of the volume and total surface area, we multiply the two values:

VA = (444π)(330π)

  ≈ 146520π²

Therefore, the product of the volume and total surface area of the given right conical frustum is approximately 146520π².

Learn more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/21623450

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation: it would help to compare whitch the answer would be 5 to 7

Answer:

the prime factorization of 252 is. 252 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 7 = 22 × 32 × 7.

The 2 missing numbers are not given, so I'm unsure about the 2 missing numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Definitions

Prime number: A whole number greater than 1 that cannot be made by multiplying other whole numbers.

Prime Factorization: Prime numbers that multiply together to make the original number.

The first few prime numbers are:  2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, ...

To find which prime numbers multiply together to make 252, begin by dividing 252 by the first prime number, 2:

⇒ 252 ÷ 2 = 126

As 126 is not a prime number, we need to divide again.  

⇒ 126 ÷ 2 = 63

As 63 is not a prime number, and 63 is not divisible by 2, try dividing it by the next prime number, 3:

⇒ 63 ÷ 3 = 21

As 63 is not a prime number, divide again.  

⇒ 21 ÷ 3 = 7

As 7 is a prime number, we can stop.

Therefore, 252 is the product of:

⇒ 252 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 7

As 2 and 3 appear twice, we can write these using exponents:

⇒ 252 = 2² × 3² × 7

A linear inequality to represent how many hours, h, Regina will have to babysit before she has enough money to buy the Oculus is,

10h + 250 ≥ 400.

Inequality is a relation that compares two numbers or other mathematical expressions in an unequal way.

The symbol a < b indicates that a is smaller than b.

When a > b is used, it indicates that a is bigger than b.

a is less than or equal to b when a notation like a ≤ b.

a is bigger or equal value of an is indicated by the notation a ≥ b.

Given, The Oculus costs $400.

Regina has already saved $250, and she earns $10 an hour babysitting on the weekends.

Assuming no. of hours to be h.

∴  A linear inequality to represent how many hours, h, Regina will have to babysit before she has enough money to buy the Oculus is,

10h + 250 ≥ 400.

10h ≥ 150.

h ≥ 15

learn more about linear inequalities here :

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ1

The probability of the region not flooding the next year is 19/20.

Given that a region is prone to flooding once every 20 years, we can calculate the probability of flooding in any one year as:

Probability of flooding in any one year = 1/20 = 0.05

Since the probability of flooding in any one year is greater than 0, the probability of not flooding in any one year would be:

Probability of not flooding in any one year = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95

Therefore, the probability of not flooding the next year in this region would be 0.95 or 95%.
Hi, I'd be happy to help you with your probability question.

The probability of flooding in the region any one year is 1/20 (once every 20 years). To find the probability of not flooding the next year, we need to find the complement of the probability of flooding.

Step 1: Determine the probability of flooding.
P(Flooding) = 1/20

Step 2: Find the complement probability.
P(Not Flooding) = 1 - P(Flooding)

Step 3: Calculate the probability of not flooding.
P(Not Flooding) = 1 - (1/20) = 19/20

The probability of the region not flooding the next year is 19/20.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

We can approach this problem using the concept of probability and complement rule.

Given that a region is prone to flooding once every 20 years, we can assume that the probability of flooding in any given year is 1/20 or 0.05 (since once in 20 years means once in 20 trials, and the probability of success in any one trial is 1/20).

Now, the probability of not flooding in the next year can be calculated using the complement rule, which states that the probability of an event happening is equal to 1 minus the probability of the event not happening.

Therefore, the probability of not flooding in the next year can be calculated as follows:

P(not flooding) = 1 - P(flooding)

P(not flooding) = 1 - 0.05

P(not flooding) = 0.95

So, the probability of not flooding in the next year is 0.95 or 95%. This means that there is a high likelihood that the region will not experience flooding in the next year.

However, it's important to note that the probability of flooding in any given year is still greater than 0, which means that there is always a possibility of flooding occurring, regardless of whether it occurred in the previous year or not.

To know more about probability visit -

brainly.com/question/31469353

#SPJ11

Question: In a sale, the price of a book is reduced by 25%. The price of the book in the sale is £12. Work out the original price of the book

Answer: £16

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the original price of the book, we can use the fact that the sale price is 75% (100% - 25%) of the original price. Let's denote the original price as x.

75% of x = £12

To solve for x, we can set up the equation:

0.75x = £12

To isolate x, we divide both sides of the equation by 0.75:

x = £12 / 0.75

x = £16

Therefore, the original price of the book was £16.

Answer:

-7

Step-by-step explanation:

Quick math hack, if the first number is negative, subtracting from it is basically addition.

-1-6=-7

1+6=7

The probability of getting exactly one success in 8 trials is 0.3217. The probability of getting at most 4 successes in 8 trials is 1. The probability of getting at least 5 successes in 8 trials is 0.7708.

(a) The probability of getting exactly 1 success in 8 trials with a success probability of 0.35 is given by the binomial probability formula as:

\(P(x = 1) = (8 choose 1) * 0.35^1 * 0.65^7 = 0.3217\)

Therefore, the probability of getting exactly one success in 8 trials is 0.3217.

(b) The probability of getting at most 4 successes in 8 trials can be calculated by adding the probabilities of getting 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 successes:

P(x ≤ 4) = P(x = 0) + P(x = 1) + P(x = 2) + P(x = 3) + P(x = 4)

Using the binomial probability formula as before, we get:

P(x ≤ 4) = 0.1142 + 0.3217 + 0.3574 + 0.1826 + 0.0477 = 1

Therefore, the probability of getting at most 4 successes in 8 trials is 1.

(c) The probability of getting at least 5 successes in 8 trials can be calculated by adding the probabilities of getting 5, 6, 7, or 8 successes:

P(x ≥ 5) = P(x = 5) + P(x = 6) + P(x = 7) + P(x = 8)

Using the binomial probability formula as before, we get:

P(x ≥ 5) = 0.2271 + 0.3118 + 0.1923 + 0.0396 = 0.7708

Therefore, the probability of getting at least 5 successes in 8 trials is 0.7708.

To know more about probability refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The probability will be b) 4/(52 13)

In a standard deck, there are four suits (hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades), each containing 13 cards. To find the probability of obtaining a bridge hand with all 13 cards of the same suit, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes (hands with all 13 cards of the same suit) and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes (all possible bridge hands).

Calculate the number of favorable outcomes

There are four suits, so for each suit, we can choose 13 cards out of 13 in that suit. Therefore, there is only one favorable outcome for each suit.

Calculate the total number of possible outcomes

To determine the total number of possible bridge hands, we need to calculate the number of ways to choose 13 cards out of 52. This can be represented as "52 choose 13" or (52 13) using the combination formula.

Calculate the probability

The probability is given by the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes. Since there is one favorable outcome for each suit and a total of 4 suits, the probability is 4 divided by the total number of possible outcomes.

Therefore, the probability that a bridge hand will contain all 13 cards of the same suit is 4/(52 13).

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this equation, we can illustrate the algebraic concepts being employed and solve for the variable.

3(x - 4) = 2x + 5 Distribute the 3 into the parentheses.

3x - 12 = 2x + 5 Subtract 2x from both sides of the equation to combine like terms.

x - 12 = 5 Add 12 to both sides of the equation.

x = 17

Answer:

\( \displaystyle \rm \longmapsto \:3(x - 4) = 2x + 5\)

\( \displaystyle \rm \longmapsto \:3x - 12 = 2x + 5\)

\( \displaystyle \rm \longmapsto 3x - 2x - 12 = 2x - 2x + 5\)

\(\displaystyle \rm \longmapsto x - 12 = 5\)

\(\displaystyle \rm \longmapsto x - 12 + 12 = 5 + 12\)

\(\displaystyle \rm \longmapsto x = 15\)

Answer:

1. 343^2/3 = 49

2. (2197^1/3)² = 169

3. 729^2/3 = 81

4. (1000²)^1/3 = 100

5. (³√9261)² = 441

6. ³√216² = 36

Hope this helps.

Answer:

$3,619.09

Step-by-step explanation:

liam deposits $2400 into an account that earns 8.3% interest compounded quarterly.

Compound interest formula is

where A is the final amount

P is the initial amount deposited

r is the rate of interest

n is the compounding period

t is the time in years

P= 2400, r= 8.3%= 0.083, t=5, n=4 (quarterly)

Plug in all the values

A= 3619.09

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

In ΔHBC and ΔACB,

            Statements                      Reasons

1). CB ≅ CB (leg)                          1). Reflexive property

2). BA ≅ CH (Hypotenuse)         2). Additional information for the

                                                       congruence of two right triangles by HL

                                                       property.

3). ΔHBC ≅ ΔACB                       3). HL property of congruence

Option D will be the correct option.

Therefore, the top of the ladder is sliding down the wall at a rate of 3.75 ft/sec (negative rate) when the bottom is 15 feet from the wall.

To solve this problem, we can use related rates and the Pythagorean theorem.

Let's denote the distance between the bottom of the ladder and the wall as x, and the height of the ladder (distance from the ground to the top of the ladder) as y. We are given that dx/dt = -2 ft/sec (negative because the bottom is sliding away from the wall).

According to the Pythagorean theorem, x^2 + y^2 = 17^2.

Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to time t, we get:

2x(dx/dt) + 2y(dy/dt) = 0.

Substituting the given values, x = 15 ft and dx/dt = -2 ft/sec, we can solve for dy/dt:

2(15)(-2) + 2y(dy/dt) = 0,

-60 + 2y(dy/dt) = 0,

2y(dy/dt) = 60,

dy/dt = 60 / (2y).

To find the value of y, we can use the Pythagorean theorem:

x^2 + y^2 = 17^2,

15^2 + y^2 = 289,

y^2 = 289 - 225,

y^2 = 64,

y = 8 ft.

Now we can substitute y = 8 ft into the equation to find dy/dt:

dy/dt = 60 / (2 * 8) = 60 / 16 = 3.75 ft/sec.

To know more about ladder,

https://brainly.com/question/11686990

#SPJ11

B

1) Gathering the data

Theresa, Brother 1, Brother 2 and her Sister

Ages: 12 15 18

Mean: 13

2) We can find out Theresa's age by applying the Arithmetic Mean formula. There are four siblings, so 4 in the denominator. Let's call Theresa's age by "t" and replace x by 13 (the mean):

3) Hence, Theresa is 7 years old.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry if this is different, but based on what I read, here is the answer.

100 x 0.85 = 85

therefor it is 85%, which is significantly more than 80%

Main Answer: The integral ∬(curl F) · dS = 0.

Supporting Question and Answer:

What is Stokes' theorem and how is it used to evaluate line integrals over closed surfaces?

Stokes' theorem relates a line integral of a vector field around a closed curve to a surface integral of the curl of that vector field over the region bounded by the curve. It states that the line integral of a vector field around a closed curve C is equal to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over the surface S bounded by C. Mathematically, it can be expressed as ∮C F · dr = ∬S (curl F) · dS. This theorem provides a convenient way to evaluate line integrals over closed surfaces by converting them into surface integrals using the curl of the vector field.

Body of the Solution:To evaluate the integral using Stokes' theorem, we first need to compute the curl of the vector field F = (-y, x, xyz).

The curl of F is given by: curl F = (d/dx, d/dy, d/dz) × (-y, x, xyz)

Let's calculate the individual components of the curl:

(d/dx) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dx)(-y) - (d/dy)(x))

= (0, 0, 0 - 1) = (0, 0, -1)

(d/dy) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dy)(-y) - (d/dx)(x))

= (0, 0, -1 - 1) = (0, 0, -2)

(d/dy) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dy)(-y) - (d/dx)(x))

= (0, 0, -1 - 1) = (0, 0, -2)

(d/dz) × (-y, x, xyz)= ((d/dz)(x) - (d/dx)(xyz), (d/dz)(y) - (d/dy)(xyz), 0)

= (0 - yz, 0 - xz, 0)

= (-yz, -xz, 0)

Now, we have the curl of F as curl F = (0, 0, -1) + (0, 0, -2) + (-yz, -xz, 0)

= (-yz, -xz, -3)

Next, we need to find the surface S, which is the part of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 25 lying below the plane z = 4. To determine the orientation, we consider the outward-pointing normal vector.

The equation of the sphere can be written as z = sqrt(25 - x^2 - y^2). Since the plane is z = 4, we have sqrt(25 - x^2 - y^2) = 4. Solving for z, we get z = 4.

So, the surface S is given by S: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 25, z = 4.

To apply Stokes' theorem, we need to calculate the surface area vector dS. For a sphere, the surface area vector is simply the outward-pointing normal vector, which is (0, 0, 1) for our surface S.

Finally, we can evaluate the given integral using Stokes' theorem:

∬(curl F) · dS = ∭(div(curl F)) dV

Since the curl of F is (0, 0, -3), the divergence of curl F, div(curl F), is 0.

Thus, the integral ∬(curl F) · dS = ∭(div(curl F)) dV = 0.

Final Answer:Therefore, the value of the given integral is 0.

To learn more about Stokes' theorem and how is it used to evaluate line integrals over closed surfaces from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28381095

#SPJ4

The integral ∬(curl F) · dS = 0.

What is Stokes' theorem and how is it used to evaluate line integrals over closed surfaces?

Stokes' theorem relates a line integral of a vector field around a closed curve to a surface integral of the curl of that vector field over the region bounded by the curve. It states that the line integral of a vector field around a closed curve C is equal to the surface integral of the curl of the vector field over the surface S bounded by C. Mathematically, it can be expressed as ∮C F · dr = ∬S (curl F) · dS. This theorem provides a convenient way to evaluate line integrals over closed surfaces by converting them into surface integrals using the curl of the vector field.

To evaluate the integral using Stokes' theorem, we first need to compute the curl of the vector field F = (-y, x, xyz).

The curl of F is given by: curl F = (d/dx, d/dy, d/dz) × (-y, x, xyz)

Let's calculate the individual components of the curl:

(d/dx) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dx)(-y) - (d/dy)(x))

= (0, 0, 0 - 1) = (0, 0, -1)

(d/dy) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dy)(-y) - (d/dx)(x))

= (0, 0, -1 - 1) = (0, 0, -2)

(d/dy) × (-y, x, xyz) = (0, 0, (d/dy)(-y) - (d/dx)(x))

= (0, 0, -1 - 1) = (0, 0, -2)

(d/dz) × (-y, x, xyz)= ((d/dz)(x) - (d/dx)(xyz), (d/dz)(y) - (d/dy)(xyz), 0)

= (0 - yz, 0 - xz, 0)

= (-yz, -xz, 0)

Now, we have the curl of F as curl F = (0, 0, -1) + (0, 0, -2) + (-yz, -xz, 0)

= (-yz, -xz, -3)

Next, we need to find the surface S, which is the part of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 25 lying below the plane z = 4. To determine the orientation, we consider the outward-pointing normal vector.

The equation of the sphere can be written as z = sqrt(25 - x^2 - y^2). Since the plane is z = 4, we have sqrt(25 - x^2 - y^2) = 4. Solving for z, we get z = 4.

So, the surface S is given by S: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 25, z = 4.

To apply Stokes' theorem, we need to calculate the surface area vector dS. For a sphere, the surface area vector is simply the outward-pointing normal vector, which is (0, 0, 1) for our surface S.

Finally, we can evaluate the given integral using Stokes' theorem:

∬(curl F) · dS = ∭(div(curl F)) dV

Since the curl of F is (0, 0, -3), the divergence of curl F, div(curl F), is 0.

Thus, the integral ∬(curl F) · dS = ∭(div(curl F)) dV = 0.

Therefore, the value of the given integral is 0.

To learn more about Stokes' theorem

brainly.com/question/28381095

#SPJ4

Answer:

y = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

If x = -7, plug the number in the equation

y = -(-7) + 6

-(-7) is equal to -1 x -7 which equals 7

y = 7 + 6

y = 13

Consider the complete graph K66, select a vertex, and ensure that at least 17 edges connected to it have the same color. This guarantees no monochromatic triangle, implying R4(3) ≤ 66.

To show that R4(3) ≤ 66, we consider the complete graph K66. Let's choose a vertex in K66 and analyze the edges connected to it.

When we choose a vertex in K66, there are 65 edges connected to that vertex. We want to find at least one triangle (K3) with all edges of the same color.

Now, let's assume that we have 16 or fewer edges of the same color connected to the chosen vertex. In this case, we can assign each color to one of the remaining 49 vertices in K66. Since we have 3 colors to choose from, by the pigeonhole principle, there must exist a pair of vertices among the remaining 49 that share the same color as one of the 16 or fewer edges connected to the chosen vertex.

This means we can form a monochromatic triangle (K3) with the chosen vertex and the pair of vertices that share the same color. Therefore, if we have 16 or fewer edges of the same color connected to the chosen vertex, we can find a monochromatic triangle.

However, we want to show that R4(3) ≤ 66, which means we need to find a coloring of K66 where no monochromatic triangle exists. To achieve this, we ensure that at least 17 edges connected to the chosen vertex have the same color. This guarantees that no monochromatic triangle can be formed.

Therefore, by considering K66 and selecting a vertex with at least 17 edges of the same color connected to it, we can conclude that R4(3) ≤ 66.

To learn more about monochromatic triangle click here: brainly.com/question/32720744

#SPJ11

The Tukey's "honestly significant difference" test is a post-hoc test.What is a post-hoc test?In statistics, a post-hoc test is a statistical test conducted after another test that has yielded statistical significance has been conducted.

The post-hoc test may be utilized to discover which group or groups within a larger population are responsible for the statistical significance of the findings.

The Tukey's "honestly significant difference" test is a post-hoc test which compares all possible pairs of means in a sample and determines if there is a statistically significant difference between them. It is frequently used in conjunction with one-way ANOVA and is useful in identifying where significant differences exist between groups when the ANOVA determines that a statistically significant difference exists. The "150" you mentioned is not relevant to the question and has not been used anywhere in the context.

Learn more about post-hoc

https://brainly.com/question/105597

#SPJ11