HELP ASAP!!!
“Who were the two primary allies of the Americans? Why did they support
the Americans? “

Answer: agriculture

Explanation:

reeAnswer:

Explanation:

Answer:

hammurabi

Explanation:

Answer:

nasaan ung kwento hahahehe

Answer:

If an anti-American government were to be elected in an allied country, it is possible that the country would sever ties with the United States. This could have a large impact on U.S. foreign policy, as it would mean that the United States would lose an important ally.

Explanation:

Give me brainliest if that helped :)

The French and Indian War

Georgia took on a new shape as a result of that treaty, with its western boundary becoming the Mississippi River rather than the Pacific Ocean. ... West Florida, with Pensacola as its capital, extended west to the Mississippi River.

Answer:   the french and Indian war Georgia took on a new shape as a result of that treaty with its boundary becoming the Mississippi river rather than the pacific ocean

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer:

Looking at the above document, we can tell that Alexander's legacy extended to India because the religion that was most directly influenced by Greek art and ritual is Buddhism in India. Alexander was responsible for conquering the Persian empire all the way to India so if the Greeks are influencing anything in India - as they are Buddhism - this is a legacy of Alexander.

We can also see from the above that his influence extended to Italy as well because the Roman emperor, Marcus Macrinus had images of Alexander the Great sewn into his clothing. Italy was the seat of power for the Roman empire so for Alexander to have been depicted by a Roman emperor, his legacy must have extended to Italy.

The French Revolution became a period of predominant social upheaval that started out in 1787 and resulted in 1799. It sought to absolutely exchange the relationship between the rulers and contents.

The French Revolution become a watershed event in international records that started in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s with the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte. throughout this era, French citizens radically altered their political panorama, uprooting centuries-old institutions which includes the monarchy and the feudal machine.

Governed and redefined the character of politics The 3 foremost dreams of the French Revolution were liberty, equality, and fraternity. Liberty supposed that everyone had all of their herbal rights and freedoms. Equality intended that everyone would be the same in the eyes of the government. Fraternity meant that everybody would get along and recognize each different's rights.

Learn more about  French Revolution  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1046744

#SPJ4

Answer:

Lincoln's election in 1860 was seen as a threat to the institution of slavery by many southern states, who believed that his policies would lead to its eventual abolition. This fear, combined with long-standing tensions between the North and South over issues such as states' rights and tariffs, led to the secession of several slave states from the Union.

Explanation:

In his "Crisis of Confidence" speech, President Jimmy Carter makes an effort to persuade the country via the use of pathos how to respond to the 1978 oil shock and the ensuing recession.

The courageous deeds of Americans' parents during the Great Depression were not viewed as an inspiration. Instead, they questioned why President Carter was unfairly comparing their predicament to that of their parents. Carter's critiques of work and saving prevented Americans from reflecting on their behavior.

That shift from shame and guilt to drive and empowerment fell flat. The American people would not forgive Carter for what they perceived as an attack on their character, and Carter's attempt to employ pathos stalled out on an island of ill feelings.

To learn more about "Crisis of Confidence"

https://brainly.com/question/8729412

#SPJ1

Answer:

It can improve a product without worrying about competition. It can supply all the customers in a market with a good or service. It does not have to worry about costs because it is not run for profit. It can work to improve a product due to pressure from other producers.

Explanation:

Your Welcome.  Feel free to ask me any other questions i will be glad to answer :)

There are some benefits of a natural monopoly are:

If there is only one seller in the market, that is a monopoly. The railway department, which acts as a monopoly and is the only vendor for setting ticket prices for train services, is an example of this.  The monopoly was the one seller in the market are the sale the product and the services.

A natural monopolistic market in which a single supplier can produce the output due to its size. This suggests that a natural monopoly firm can create all of the production required in a given market. Examples include gas networks, power grids, and train infrastructures.

Therefore, option (a), (b), and (b) is correct.

Learn more about on monopoly, here:

https://brainly.com/question/5992626

#SPJ5

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.

The automobile and aviation trailblazer who became the first British man to be killed in a powered aircraft accident when he died in a 1910 crash at Hengistbury airfield was Charles Rolls.

Charles Rolls was a British man and co-founder of the Rolls-Royce car company, as well as a pioneering aviator who was one of the first individuals to fly across the English Channel.

However, Rolls had a more personal interest in aviation, and in 1910 he became the first British man to be killed in a powered aircraft accident when he died in a crash at Hengistbury Airfield.

In his brief flying career, he had been a remarkable ambassador for the nascent aviation industry and had encouraged many others to become involved in the development of flight.

To know more about aviation click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13988898

#SPJ11

Answer:

The cost of production is increased.

Explanation:

The cost of production does not rise as a result of labor division. In fact, it frequently lowers expenses since workers are more productive and efficient.

Answer:

Wroclaw is located in western Poland along the Oder river. It has a population of 637,075. It was chosen as one of the European Capitals of Culture because of its multi-cultural heritage, including people of Czech, Polish, and German descent. Additionally, this city has a wide range of architecture seen in the houses, churches, and universities.

Answer: Wroclaw is located in western Poland along the Oder river. It has a population of 637,075. It was chosen as one of the European Capitals of Culture because of its multi-cultural heritage, including people of Czech, Polish, and German descent. Additionally, this city has a wide range of architecture seen in the houses, churches, and universities

Explanation:

When comparing the two, the correct answer is option C, values are more stable than attitudes, since values are formed in early life and tend to remain the same.

Values refer to deeply held beliefs and principles that guide an individual's behavior and judgment. They are typically formed early in life and tend to be relatively stable over time. Values are influenced by various factors such as culture, family upbringing, and personal experiences.

Attitudes, on the other hand, are evaluations and opinions towards specific objects, people, or ideas. They are more susceptible to change compared to values because attitudes are influenced by a variety of factors, including personal experiences, social interactions, and new information.

Therefore, we can conclude option C is the right answer.

This is the complete question:

In contrasting values and attitudes, which one of the following is true?

A) They come from different sources.

B) There is no significant correlation between the two.

C) Values are more stable than attitudes.

D) Attitudes are more stable than values.

Learn more about values and attitudes here:

https://brainly.com/question/27993504

#SPJ4

Congress could not restrict the expansion of slavery. "Bleeding Kansas" showed the divisiveness and how far people were willing to go over the issue of True

Three awesome political companies occupied Kansas: pro-slavery, unfastened-Staters and abolitionists. Violence broke out straight away between those opposing factions and persevered till 1861 when Kansas entered the Union as a unfastened state on January 29. this era became for all time known as Bleeding Kansas.

Bleeding Kansas verified that armed war over slavery was unavoidable. Its severity made country wide headlines, which cautioned to the yank human beings that the sectional disputes were unlikely to be resolved with out bloodshed, and it, consequently, acted as a preface to the Civil struggle.

Bleeding Kansas become a mini civil warfare among pro- and anti-slavery forces that took place in Kansas from 1856 to 1865. Following the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, heaps of Northerners and Southerners got here to the newly created Kansas Territory.

Learn more about Bleeding Kansas  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1352175

#SPJ4

Answer:

A and C

Explanation:

Even though it seems the President is the most important person in America, they actually have superiors to. They cannot just make decisions out of the blue, they have to run them by a lot of people that help them with that. The President may need a lot of help, yes, but they took into consideration how much this job would take from them when they ran as candidates.

(Not very good with helping people through text, but I hope this helps at least a little!)

Answer: The answer is A, hope this helps! :)

Answer:

In moral and political philosophy, the social contract is a theory or model that originated during the Age of Enlightenment and usually concerns the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.

Explanation:

Economic factors had a great influence on the Mexican Revolution because the majority of the population was poor and did not have land to work or jobs.

The Mexican Revolution is a term to refer to the armed conflict that took place in Mexico between the years 1910 - 1920.

The main cause for the beginning of this conflict was the situation in Mexico under the dictatorship known as the Porfiriato between 1876 and 1911.

During these 35 years, Mexico experienced economic growth and political stability. However, the development had high social costs that mainly impacted the lower strata of society and the political opposition to the Díaz regime.

This caused great discontent that motivated the lower classes to take up arms against the government to demand better living conditions for all.

Learn more about Mexican Revolution in: https://brainly.com/question/1071554

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Answer:

n order to understand Austria’s role in the dissolution of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the country’s position toward German Unification, one needs to analyze the events of 1989-1990 against a broader historical background. On the one hand, this consists of long-term developments, such as Austria’s relationship to the two German states prior to 1989 and the increasing permeability of the Austrian-Hungarian border in the 1970s and 1980s. On the other hand, Vienna’s integration policy, which changed in 1987, should be taken into account. This Working Paper introduces this historical background and is structured into four parts. The first section examines Austria’s relations with East Germany from the 1970s and West Germany’s reactions to this process. The second section offers a concise overview of Austrian-Hungarian relations in the 1970s and 1980s, focusing on the gradual transformation of the border regime, its significance for the events at the Austrian-Hungarian border in 1989 and their contribution to the collapse of the East German regime. Third, the Working Paper then interprets Austrian attitudes and policies towards the GDR and the question of German Unification in the crucial months from November 1989 to January 1990. In the final section, the Working Paper highlights how the process of German Unification influenced Austria’s ambitions to join the European Communities

The economy of countries without these precious metals to be affected China is the country that manufactures the most semiconductor chips globally, according to UN data.

The electronics value chain, which includes consumer electronics and ICT, has been more regionalized over time, with China emerging as a prominent global center for semiconductor chips production.

The lack of precious metals semiconductor chips has an effect on several industries, including the automobile, data center, video game, and others.

If you were thinking about purchasing a new or old automobile within the previous 18 months, you undoubtedly knew about the worldwide semiconductor chip shortage or were personally touched by it.

Learn more about precious metals, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27310206

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, so the most probable complete, question is,

The precious metals needed to make computer chips, graphic cards, and transistors are found in only a small population of countries. How will the economy of countries without these important metals be affected?

Answer:

These women were of the lower classes. Men and boys worked in factories. However, young women and children also did work in factories. ... After the industrial revolution, those women who did not work in factories were no longer involved in work that was economically valuable to their families.

hope that helps

Explanation:

U.S. Trade with Europe was worth almost one billion dollars was a reason for American neutrality.

American trade with Europe during the early 20th century contributed to American neutrality by allowing the country to maintain economic relationships with both the Allied and Central Powers.

By providing goods to both sides of the conflict, the US was able to avoid taking a political stance and maintain its neutral status. Additionally, trade allowed the US to remain economically stable, as cutting off trade with one side would have had negative consequences for the country's economy.

Find out more on American Neutrality at https://brainly.com/question/1447003

#SPJ1

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 limited contributions by individuals to no more than $25,000 in each primary or general election campaign for federal office.

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was enacted in 1971 by the United States Congress. FECA provides a framework for regulating federal elections in the United States and put limits on the size of contributions to federal political campaigns and expenditures by candidates and campaigns.

Under the law, an individual may contribute up to 2,900 to a candidate per election, with a maximum total of $5,800 per candidate for a primary and general election cycle. For PACs, individuals can contribute up to $5,000 per year, while corporations and unions may not contribute directly to campaigns but can create and fund political action committees to do so. Individuals are limited to a total of 117,000 in contributions over two years.

It is important to note that these limits can change over time as a result of inflation and other factors.In conclusion, The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 limited contributions by individuals to no more than 25,000 in each primary or general election campaign for federal office.

To know more about  result  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27751517

#SPJ11

The option "Stalin - members of the Communist Party" reflects the leader who was responsible for the Great Purge and the main group that was victimized by it.

The leader who was responsible for the great purge and the main group that was victimized by it was Stalin and members of the Communist Party. Stalin resisted all efforts for reform and established a totalitarian state, which led to the victimization and persecution of many members of the Communist Party. However, it is important to note that Stalin also pursued economic development during his reign.
To know more about Communist Party, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23961689

#SPJ11

Answer: The speech to a joint session of Congress is an opportunity for the president to review the past year's accomplishments

Explanation: