Answer:
Explanation:
no entiendo
according to u.s. law, which of the following is not an element a company/plaintiff is required to prove to win a false advertising lawsuit about an ad containing a comparative claim?
The offending advertiser intended to damage the complaining company's business is not an element a company/plaintiff is required to prove to win a false advertising lawsuit. Option c. is correct
What is a plaintiff?A plaintiff is an individual or entity that submits a claim to the court. Plaintiffs seek legal remedies. If the search is successful, the judge will rule in favor of the plaintiff and issue the necessary warrant.
The United States Constitution, which provides the framework for the United States federal government and many civil liberties, is the most important written and unwritten law of the country. False advertising refers to the act of intentionally making false claims or statements and advertising such as posting and distribution for the purpose of promoting sales of goods and services.
To know more about false advertising, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15738473
#SPJ1
The complete question is as follows:
According to U.S. law, which of the following is NOT an element a company/plaintiff is required to prove to win a false advertising lawsuit about an ad containing a comparative claim?
a. False statements have been made about either product.
b. The ads actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of the audience.
c. The offending advertiser intended to damage the complaining company's business.
d. The deception was "material" and likely to influence purchasing decisions.
Do you think problem-solving courts are beneficial? Why or why not?
The problem-solving courts are beneficial or not may depend on numerous factors, like any kind of the specific needs of the community, the availability of any resources, and also the effectiveness of the court's programs and its interventions.
What are problem-solving courts?Problem solving courts are referred to as specialized courts that specifically aim to address all the underlying issues which usually contribute to any type of criminal behavior. These types of courts often offer treatment, counselling, and various other support services to help the defendants overcome challenges like addiction, mental illness, and homelessness.
Advocates practicing in these types of problem-solving courts usually argue that they can help in reducing recidivism rates, save money on incarceration costs, and also went on to provide more effective and compassionate justice.
Various researches has shown that problem-solving courts can be a very effective tool in reducing recidivism rates for certain type of populations, including drug offenders, veterans, and people with mental illness.
Apart from this, critics of these problem-solving courts often argue that these courts may be too lenient on offenders and that they also kind of divert resources away from traditional criminal justice approaches.
To know more about court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30039981
Yes, problem-solving courts are beneficial because it helps in the rehabilitation of selected defendants.
What is the problem-solving courts?The problem-solving courts can be described as the court that helps in the supervision of the treatment as well as the rehabilitation of the defendants .
It should be noted that the court do help in the process of helping people especially in the behaviour of the people and how tyhey can be reintroduced into the society so that theycab change their behaviour in the sense that the can become a new person and a better person.
Learn more about courts at:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
Liability that arises from not maintaining a building is referred to as a) medical foundation liability. b) premises liability. c) healthcare culpability. d) healthcare facility liability.
Answer:
fhjfgkllllkiuigfffjkhddhk
limits of neighbour principle
The neighbour concept is based on the claimant demonstrating that it was logically foreseeable that the claimant would be at risk of harm or injury from the defendant's negligence.
What rules apply to neighbours?In what has come to be known as the "neighbour principle," Stevenson laid forth a general understanding of the relationships that give birth to a duty of care: You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably predict would be likely to harm your neighbour.
Is the "neighbourhood principle" a moral or legal one?The "neighbour principle" of Lord Atkin is a broad principle that transcends the particulars of the case. It may be argued that this was not part of its legal justification.
To learn more about neighbour principle visit:
brainly.com/question/30936452
#SPJ1
what is a public opinion poll
Answer:
It's a survey.
Explanation:
Public opinion poll is a humane research survey of public from a particular sample.
Answer:
It is a survey used for human research.
I hope this helped at all.Which of the following is a factor that causes a change in supply?
Taxes and subsidies
Consumer income
Consumer interests/tastes
Number of consumers in the market
valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort. valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice T/F
The statement "valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort, valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice" is true because it is considered an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
The correct answer is true.
The NLRA is a federal law that protects employees' rights to organize and engage in concerted activity to improve their wages, benefits, and working conditions. This includes the right to form or join a union, bargain collectively with their employer, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid and protection.
Valley Mart's statement that employees would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort is considered an unfair labor practice under the NLRA because it is a form of interference, restraint, or coercion that can intimidate employees and chill the exercise of their protected rights.
To know more about National Labor Relations Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8726856
#SPJ4
Besides the American revolution, Paine was also also involved in_____
A. The French Revolution
B. The Haitian revolution
C. The Mexican revolution
D. The Russian revolution
Answer:
A french revolution
Explanation:
I just know the answe
The world’s largest forms of corporations produce and sell goods in many countries, and are known as
Answer:
Explanation:
The chicken is out into the batter. Then shaken up in a bag. once you finish that, fry it. Then it’ll be good and kwispy
the MNC .multinational corporations is the world's largest forms of corporations
help if u can
200/200
yea yea yea
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is 1.
Explanation:
200/200
=1
Which situational condition decreases the chances of crimes?
O A.
ethnic heterogeneity
O B. Relative deprivation
O C. Ineffective schools
O D. Installation of security camera
Answer:
D: Installation of security cameras
Explanation:
I have the answer now .
yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Question 7 of 20
Which
the following is an example of a violation of civil law?
A. A group of children deface property.
B. A designer hasn't been paid for her work.
C. A passenger assaults a taxi cab driver.
O D. An individual commits credit card fraud
Answer:
It’s probably
Explanation:
C
Answer: the answer is B: a designer hat hasn't been paid for her work
Explanation:
because
A: is vandalism
C: is assault or battery
D: is scamming or credit card fraud
so B is the answer
thank you for your time.
ghost out
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the primary English law of employment was that, in theabsence of a contract, a worker was hired for a year at a time.TrueFalse
Yes it is true, that Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the primary English law of employment was that, in the absence of a contract, a worker was hired for a year at a time.
The History of labour law in the United Kingdom concerns the development of UK labour law, from its roots in Roman and medieval times in the British Isles up to the present. Before the Industrial Revolution and the introduction of mechanised manufacture, regulation of workplace relations was based on status, rather than contract or mediation through a system of trade unions.
Serfdom was the prevailing status of the mass of people, except where artisans in towns could gain a measure of self-regulation through guilds. In 1740 save for the fly-shuttle the loom was as it had been since weaving had begun. The law of the land was, under the Act of Apprentices 1563, that wages in each district should be assessed by Justices of the Peace. From the middle of the 19th century, through Acts such as the Master and Servant Act 1867 and the Employers and Workmen Act 1875, there became growing recognition that greater protection was needed to promote the health and safety of workers, as well as preventing unfair practices in wage contracts.
To learn more about labour law visit here ; https://brainly.com/question/28179111?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
why does amy coney barret deserve confirmation and why doesn't she?
please help
Answer: hope one of them are right
Explanation:
In her Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Amy Coney Barrett dodges ... Letters to the Editor: Amy Coney Barrett refuses to give basic answers that Americans deserve ... To the editor: Senator: "Judge Barrett, can a president issue an ... That's how Barrett answers any question she doesn't want to answer.
Barrett said Tuesday that she is an "originalist" when it comes to interpreting the U.S. ... She continued: "But I want to be careful to say that if I'm confirmed, you would not be ... Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett arrives to testify before the Senate ... “She doesn't deserve that,″ Graham said
Answer:
Explanation:
President Trump and even Obama said ingenious things. That a President is elected to 4 years. Not 3 1/2 years, not 4 1/2 years but 4 years! President Trump is officially President of the US and has all the rights/obligations/duties of the President until the next president (whether he gets reelected or Biden gets in) takes the official oath of office in January the 20th at 12:00 pm. Trump had every right to nominate Barrett and any other suggestion that he did not, is ridiculous.
which view of crime suggests that individuals are born "good" and become "bad" as they mature?
The view of crime that suggests individuals are born "good" and become "bad" as they mature is known as the sociological perspective on criminal behavior.
The view of crime that suggests individuals are born "good" and become "bad" as they mature is often associated with the social learning theory. This theory suggests that people learn how to behave by observing others, and this includes criminal behavior.
According to this view, people are not inherently predisposed to commit crimes, but rather learn this behavior over time. There are several factors that contribute to this learning process.
For example, children may learn criminal behavior from parents or peers who engage in criminal activity. Additionally, exposure to violence or other negative experiences can contribute to a person's tendency to commit crimes.
While this view of crime suggests that individuals are not born "bad," it is important to note that there are other factors that can contribute to criminal behavior.
For example, some people may have a genetic predisposition to certain behaviors or mental health conditions that make them more likely to commit crimes. Overall, the social learning theory provides a useful framework for understanding how criminal behavior develops.
By recognizing the various factors that contribute to criminal behavior, we can better understand how to prevent and address these issues in our communities.
This perspective emphasizes the role of social influences, such as family, peers, and socioeconomic factors, in shaping an individual's behavior and choices.
According to this view, people are not inherently predisposed to criminal behavior but may engage in crime due to environmental factors and social circumstances that influence their decision-making.
Visit here to learn more about Behavior:
brainly.com/question/29656202
#SPJ11
based on previous supreme court rulings, the form of speech in the image could be limited if it
The kind of speech in the photograph might be restricted if it takes place at a certain location, time, or in a particular way, according to past Supreme Court decisions.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the top court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution directly calls for. The number of Supreme Court justices is not clearly forth in the Constitution; rather, Congress determines the number. Along with the Chief Justice, the President of India has appointed 30 more judges to the Supreme Court of India. Judges of the Supreme Court begin their retirement at age 65. The supreme court is the highest court in the majority of legal systems. The terms "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal" are also used to refer to these courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/28046758
#SPJ4
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
100
20
10
50
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.
The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.
It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.
The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.
To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/27878011
#SPJ4
Correct question:
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
a) 100
b) 20
c) 10
d) 50
A corporation or other business entity must be in good standing (to have capacity to enter into a contract.
Answer:
A corporation or said businesses is an artificial organization or cadre that is made by humans and has complete power over it's rights, wealth , power and etc.
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when:.
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
What is exculpatory clause?An exculpatory clause is when someone or an organization is excused from liability from things like negligence or wrongdoing when faced with a lawsuit.
An example of exculpatory clause is when a venue print an exculpatory clause on tickets it sells for a concert, indicating that it is not responsible for personal injury caused by employees or others during the show.
Hence, an exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
Learn more about exculpatory clause here : https://brainly.com/question/4631290
a When a school bus
is stopped on the roadway, you must always stop when?
Answer:
When there is no land island between you and the bus.
Explanation:
If you are on the other side of Traffic you still have to stop, but if there is an island you don't have to stop.
Which is NOT a definition of "Demos"
a. Freedom
b. Districts within Athens
c. Populace
d. The people
Answer:
A. Freedom
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation: trust me yw
que es la economia colonial y sus caracterizticas?
Answer:
Elements of pilgrim economy Colonial economy was trade situated (for example creation of money crops, mineral. It was shady in nature, that is Africans were profoundly taken advantage of. It went connected at the hip with estrangement of (Africans were distanced from their territory which was utilized by the Europeans).
Hope this helped! :D
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
what would be a specific legal term used to describe a violation you may have interpreted to occur in bosley’s case?
One specific legal term that may apply to a violation in the Bosley's case is "breach of contract.
" This term refers to a situation where one party fails to uphold the terms of a contract that they have agreed to, resulting in harm or damages to the other party. In this case, if Bosley's did not fulfill their obligations to deliver the agreed-upon furniture to the customer, they may be in breach of contract. The customer may be entitled to remedies such as specific performance, where the court orders Bosley's to fulfill their end of the contract, or damages to compensate for any losses suffered as a result of the breach.
Learn more about legal term
https://brainly.com/question/13283420
#SPJ4
Abuse involves payment for items or services when there is no legal entitlement to that payment and the provider has not knowingly and/or intentionally misrepresented facts to obtain payment.
Abuse involves purchasing items or services whilst there's no prison entitlement to that charge, and the provider has now not knowingly or deliberately misrepresented information to achieve price.
An entitlement is something to that you have a right. An instance of entitlement is a government program that provides benefits to a person such as Medicare. An example of entitlement is the opportunity to revel in the use of belongings you personal, free of unwarranted intrusion.
Entitlement refers to a guarantee of getting the right of entry to benefits based totally on hooked-up rights or regulations. it is a provision made according to the prison framework of society. each proper is an entitlement related to a moral or social precept.
Learn more about legal entitlement here:https://brainly.com/question/921569
#SPJ4
Explain why is law is an instrument which regulate human conducts?
Answer:
Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Which system has a central government and local units that implement the central government’s decisions?
A.
monarchical system
B.
unitary system
C.
federal system
D.
parliamentary system
Answer:
i think its c.................