--Game Riddle--

DETECTIVE TIME!

> Do not cheating and Do not lookup/searching in any website <

> u can use/say ( "use the hint" ) <

how to play:

3 question to answer and u got a scores. I'm gonna count the scores if ur answer right, but if ur answer carelessly I'm not gonna count ur scores and disqualified ( perm-report ), I hope u enjoyed! :>

(warning: may contain offensive language)

1. Accused of stealing the farmer’s chickens, Jack is locked up in an empty room in the local jail. His cell has a dirt floor and is completely void of any accessories except for a shovel. There is a window overlooking the hills outside. Jack is determined to break out and prove his innocence, but the window is too high to reach.
How can he escape?

Note: that digging a tunnel is not a feasible option because the ground beneath the dirt is rock hard. Jack doesn’t have the energy to dig through it as he is deprived of food and water.

2. An elderly woman lived alone in her house by the suburbs. She rarely left the house and knew only a few people. One Friday morning, the mailman called out for the woman but didn’t receive a prompt answer as usual. Upon peeking in through the window, the mailman realized that the woman was murdered. The police investigated the house and found Tuesday’s newspaper by the dead body. Also, by the door outside, there were three unopened bottles of milk, one of which had gone bad.
The police arrested the killer the very next day. How did they figure out so quickly?

3. A renowned chemist is found dead in his lab. There is no clear evidence except a piece of paper lying by the body. The paper is blank other than the name of five elements scrawled across it hastily:

• Nickel
• Carbon
• Oxygen
• Lanthanum
• Sulfur

The guard reported that three people visited the chemist that day – his sister, Lanaya, his colleague, Nicolas, and his wife, Teresa.
The criminal was arrested immediately. Who was it?

I hope u enjoyed! :>

Questions by imaginationYTB ( Me :> )​

Answer:

In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.

Explanation:

Significantly, a person holding a state-issued permit allowing the person to acquire or possess firearms (e.g., a concealed weapons permit) is not required to undergo a background check if the permit was issued: (1) within the previous five years in the state in which the transfer is to take place; and (2) after an authorized government official has conducted a background investigation to verify that possession of a firearm would not be unlawful.13 Permits issued after November 30, 1998 qualify as exempt only if the approval process included a NICS check.14

A lawyer boasting about winning a case in a blog post is prohibited due to concerns related to confidentiality, professionalism, and advertising regulations.

Firstly, confidentiality is a fundamental aspect of the attorney-client relationship, and discussing case specifics may inadvertently reveal sensitive client information. This breach of confidentiality can damage the trust between the client and the attorney, as well as negatively impact the lawyer's reputation.
Secondly, professionalism is crucial in the legal field. Boasting about a case victory may be seen as unprofessional, as it may give the impression that the lawyer is more focused on self-promotion rather than representing the client's best interests. This behavior can potentially damage the credibility of the legal profession as a whole.
Lastly, advertising regulations set by bar associations and other legal regulatory bodies often restrict or limit the ways lawyers can promote their services. Bragging about a case win in a blog post may be considered a violation of these advertising rules, as it may be viewed as an attempt to solicit clients based on past successes, rather than a legitimate sharing of information.
In conclusion, lawyers should avoid boasting about case victories in blog postings to maintain confidentiality, uphold professionalism, and adhere to advertising regulations within the legal profession.

Learn more about lawyer here

https://brainly.com/question/28315824

#SPJ11

The statement "The Enron scandal proved that self-regulation has only benefits and little to no drawbacks, as evidenced by the role of their accounting firm, Arthur Andersen." is false as Enron scandal actually demonstrated the drawbacks and limitations of self-regulation.

The auditing company for Enron's financial statements, Arthur Andersen, was linked to the scandal. They were charged with carelessness, using shady accounting methods, and failing to adequately disclose Enron's fraudulent activities. As a result, they were found guilty of obstructing the administration of justice which ultimately caused Arthur Andersen to cease to exist as a business.

The Enron scandal brought to light the dangers of relying solely on corporate self-regulation. It demonstrated the potential for conflicts of interest, a lack of transparency and inadequate oversight when businesses are allowed to regulate themselves without the proper external oversight. To avoid similar incidents in the future the scandal prompted calls for stricter regulations and more thorough oversight.

Learn more about Enron scandal at:

brainly.com/question/28076943

#SPJ4

The law that requires the transfer of real property ownership to be in writing is the Statute of Frauds. This law ensures that the transfer of real property ownership is legally binding and reduces the potential for fraud or misunderstandings in property transactions.

The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable in court. The purpose of the statute is to prevent fraud and misunderstandings by ensuring that parties have a clear and unambiguous record of their agreement. The types of contracts that typically require writing under the statute include contracts for the sale of real estate, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, contracts for the sale of goods over a certain value, and contracts in which one party agrees to pay the debt of another. It is important to note that while the Statute of Frauds requires writing, it does not necessarily require a formal written contract. In some cases, an email or other written communication may suffice as long as it contains all of the essential terms of the agreement.

Learn more about the Statute of Frauds: https://brainly.com/question/30998940.

#SPJ11

When a court issues an order that may either require or forbid a party to perform a specified act, the court has issued a consideration.

An injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or end up doing a selected action. There are 3 sorts of injunctions: everlasting Injunctions, brief restraining orders, and initial injunctions. Transient Retraining Orders (TRO) and initial injunctions are equitable in nature.

Appellate jurisdiction method that the courtroom has the authority to check the selections of decreased courts. Most of the cases the ideally suited courtroom hears are appeals from decreased courts.

Learn more about court here https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

The court should likely decide in favor of Summer, as Robert's failure to show up constitutes a breach of contract.

The court should probably rule in Summer's favor and hold Robert accountable for contract breach. When Summer agreed to accept Robert's offer of a ride to the airport, a contract was created. Robert breached his contract by failing to appear on the day of Summer's flight. He failed to deliver the promised service, which caused Summer harm or inconvenience.

A breach of a contract may result in legal repercussions, such as the payment of compensation to the injured party in the form of damages or other remedies. The proper outcome in this case would be decided by the court after taking into account the evidence and any applicable contract laws.

Learn more about breach of contract at:

brainly.com/question/29891945

#SPJ4

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

Answer:

before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...

we can prevent the climate change by applying the 5r.

Answer:

In a nutshell: Ensure adequate processes, financing and other resources to take five main steps: emissions reduction, resilience planning, addressing loss and damage, knowledge-sharing in alternative agricultural techniques, promoting gender equality and human rights across all activities

Based on the description of the statements, the Gold is one that have to be in the first box due to the fact that if the Gold was in the second box, the terms or text on the second box would have to be labeled false.

The riddle is one that tells of a situation where there are seen to be three boxes in a table and it has one of them having  gold and the other two does not.

 If the Gold was in the third box, one can say that the statement on the third box would be one that also would be false.

Therefore, the Gold have to be in the first box, and this is one where the  statement on the first box is seen as a lie.

Learn more about Gold  from

https://brainly.com/question/18044463

#SPJ1

Answer:

no he has no right to arrest you

Bilateral treaty promoting and protecting foreign investment between Canada and China, ensuring predictability, fair treatment, and dispute resolution are the main objectives of this treaty.

A bilateral agreement between Canada and China called the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) aims to encourage and safeguard foreign investment between the two nations. This treaty's main goals are to increase predictability and security for investors, ensure fairness and equity, ease the flow of capital, and create a process for resolving investment disputes.

A bilateral agreement called the Canada-Costa Rica Foreign Investment Promotion Agreement aims to encourage and facilitate foreign investment between Canada and Costa Rica. Its primary goals include fostering an environment that is conducive to investment, making sure that investments are protected and treated fairly, and setting up mechanisms for dispute resolution.

The agreement aims to promote economic cooperation, improve market access and give investors from both nations legal certainty and predictability. The provisions on non discrimination, expropriation compensation, and free fund transfers are among the rights and responsibilities of investors that are outlined in this document. The agreement aims to deepen economic ties and promote investment flows that benefit both Canada and Costa Rica.

Learn more about bilateral agreement at:

brainly.com/question/28214309

#SPJ4

This question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.

Read “The Idea of America” by Nikole Hannah-Jones

What examples of hypocrisy in the founding of the U.S. does Hannah-Jones supply? What evidence can you see for how “some might argue that this nation was founded not as a democracy but as a slavocracy”?

Answer:

Hannah-Jones explains the hypocrisy of a democracy based on slavery.

Explanation:

She finds hypocrisy in Jefferson’s original draft of the Declaration of Independence blaming the king of England for enforcing slavery on supposably reluctant colonists. In reality, the founders had no intention of abolishing slavery, so that passage got erased.

Therefore, the Declaration of Independence doesn´t even mention slavery and the Constitution would go as far as preserving that institution.

Slavocracy is termed as the situation of the people when they are treated as slaves are made to work ruthlessly and arrogantly. They are treated as animals in the slavery situation.  

The correct answer is:

She finds hypocrisy in Jefferson’s original draft of the Declaration of Independence blaming the king of England for enforcing slavery on supposably reluctant colonists. In reality, the founders had no intention of abolishing slavery, so that passage got erased.

Therefore, the Declaration of Independence doesn´t even mention slavery and the Constitution would go as far as preserving that institution.

To know more about the hypocrisy in the founding of the U.S. does Hannah-Jones supply, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18749573

Answer:

i need the whole document sent to me not a picture my school has blocked the pictures from loading i am willing to look at it though

Explanation:

Answer:

Factors influencing the rate of elimination also include tolerance, rate of consumption, and gender. At an elimination rate of 0.015% BAC per hour: It takes 3.3 hours to eliminate 0.05% BAC.

Collaboration between the government and public entities in South Africa is essential for the effective and efficient delivery of services to citizens. This collaboration also promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance.

One of the key benefits of collaboration is the pooling of resources and expertise, which can lead to better service delivery outcomes. This can include infrastructure development, healthcare, education, and other essential services.

The government and public entities also work together to address social and economic challenges, such as poverty, unemployment, and inequality.

Effective collaboration requires strong partnerships and communication between the government and public entities. It is important to establish clear roles and responsibilities, set shared goals and objectives, and measure progress and impact.

By working together, the government and public entities can achieve their common goals and deliver better outcomes for citizens.

To know more about government visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15077883

#SPJ11

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1

Answer:

That's correct! The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was passed in response to growing concern about the impact of human activities on the environment. The act established a national policy to protect the environment and created the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to advise the president on environmental matters.

Answer:

DWI 1st Offense: A first offense DWI is a Class B misdemeanor. A conviction carries a maximum fine of $2,000 as well as a jail sentence of up to 180 days. ... A first offense conviction will also lead to a license renewal surcharge of up to $2,000 per year for three years.

Explanation:

First Offense DWI in Texas can result in a fine and an imprisonment of up to 180 days.

The First Offense DWI can be referred to or considered as an offense in which the convicted person is held guilty of a crime that is punishable with fine as well as an imprisonment. The fine is limited, and the imprisonment is also normal.

The amount of fine for an individual held in a First Offense DWI is up to $2,000; whereas, an imprisonment or a jail sentence for such act may be limited up to a maximum period of 180 days. Such crimes typically have a strict punishment in first conviction in Texas, so that the person convicted is aware of the consequences of second conviction.

Therefore, the significance of a First Offense DWI has been aforementioned.

Learn more about First Offense DWI here:

https://brainly.com/question/27369536

#SPJ2

The decision to transfer a juvenile to a different facility is influenced by several factors. These include the severity of the offense committed, the juvenile's previous response to treatment and supervision, and the level of potential danger they may pose in the future.

When determining whether to transfer a juvenile to another facility, the severity of the offense committed is a crucial consideration. More serious offenses, such as violent crimes or repeat offenses, may lead to a higher likelihood of transfer. Additionally, the prior response of the juvenile to treatment and supervision plays a significant role. If the juvenile has shown a lack of progress or a history of non-compliance with interventions, transfer might be deemed necessary.

Furthermore, the decision to transfer a juvenile takes into account the level of danger they may pose in the future. This assessment involves evaluating the potential risk the juvenile poses to themselves, other residents, and the community at large. Factors such as a high likelihood of reoffending or a demonstrated inability to control impulsive or aggressive behaviors can contribute to the decision to transfer the juvenile to a facility with more intensive interventions or a higher level of security.

Overall, the decision to transfer a juvenile is a complex process that involves weighing multiple factors. By considering the severity of the offense, the juvenile's response to treatment, and the level of future danger they may pose, authorities aim to make informed decisions that balance rehabilitation, public safety, and the best interests of the juvenile.

to learn more about interventions

click here brainly.com/question/32098929

#SPJ11

The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is a federal agency that provides training and technical assistance to correctional agencies in the United States.

According to the NIC, probation officers who directly supervise offenders are at risk of experiencing "hazardous incidents" that can endanger their safety. However, the NIC does not provide a specific percentage of probation officers who have been victims of such incidents.

Probation officers may be at risk of experiencing hazardous incidents due to the nature of their work, which often involves working with individuals who have a history of criminal behavior. These individuals may be prone to violent outbursts or other dangerous behaviors, and probation officers may be required to deal with them on a regular basis.

Learn more about hazardous incidents

https://brainly.com/question/30418524

#SPJ4

Answer:

First offenders can easily be harmed by hardened offenders.

Explanation:

First offenders are people that have done a small or minor crime. Such as debt, reckless driving while drinking or etc. So if they put a person who has done a small offense in a cell with another person that has committed a murder or an assault to harm another person, or let's say a heavy offense. That person who done a small offense will have a chance of possibly dying or having a injury and will not be able to return home safely or in the state they were in when they came.

Answer:

2 & 3 I think

Explanation:

The statements about common law are not true is

A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.

The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law.  there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.

This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.

Learn more about Common Law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8476406

#SPJ2

Answer:

cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.

pros: no prison

Explanation:

Answer: Goals

Explanation:

Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.

Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.

Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.

Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.

Learn more about immigrants here:

https://brainly.com/question/28791683

#SPJ6