For which values of x is the expression undefined?

Answer:

y=4/3x+2

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct first step in solving the inequality –4(2x – 1) > 5 – 3x is option A: Distribute –4 to get –8x + 4 > 5 – 3x.

This is because we are trying to solve for x, so we need to get x on one side of the inequality and all the other terms on the other side. In order to do this, we need to apply distributive property of multiplication over addition, which means we need to multiply the -4 with the 2x-1. By doing this we get -8x + 4 > 5 - 3x. This can help us to move forward in solving the inequality. This is the correct first step as it gets us closer to isolating the variable x on one side of the inequality.

After this step, we can further simplify the inequality by adding or subtracting similar terms to get the final solution.

It is important to remember that when solving inequalities we need to be careful with the signs, specially when dividing or multiplying by a negative number, as it might change the direction of the inequality.

To know more about mathematical inequality click below:

https://brainly.com/question/19003099#

#SPJ4

50.2 should be the anwser i doubled checked with search

and it says it is correct so it should be good.

Step-by-step explanation:

math

Answer:

x = -2/ 3

Step-by-step explanation:

in order to cancel out the logs they should have common bases

\( \mathsf{ log_{5}(3x + 5) = 2 log_{25}(1 - 3x) } \)

we can write 25 as 5²

\(\mathsf{ \implies log_{5}(3x + 5) = 2 \: log_{ {5}^{2} }(1 - 3x) } \)

we know that the reciprocal of the exponents of the bases are multiplied to the log

\(\mathsf{ \implies log_{5}(3x + 5) = \frac{1}{\cancel{2} } \times \cancel{2} \: log_{ 5}(1 - 3x) } \)

and now since the logs have common bases

\(\mathsf{ \implies \cancel { log_{5}}(3x + 5) = \cancel{ log_{ 5}}(1 - 3x) } \)

we're left with

\(\mathsf{ \implies 3x + 5 = 1 - 3x} \)

\(\mathsf{ \implies 9x = -4} \)

x = -2/ 3

The lower and upper bounds of x + y are 1040 and 1058, respectively.

What are lower bounds and upper bounds?

Lower bounds and upper bounds are used to define the range of possible values for a given quantity or measurement.

A lower bound represents the smallest possible value that a quantity could have, based on the available information or constraints. This means that the actual value of the quantity must be greater than or equal to the lower bound. For example, if we know that a person's height is between 150cm and 170cm, then the lower bound of their height is 150cm.

An upper bound represents the largest possible value that a quantity could have, based on the available information or constraints. This means that the actual value of the quantity must be less than or equal to the upper bound. For example, if we know that a person's weight is between 50kg and 80kg, then the upper bound of their weight is 80kg.

In some cases, we may be able to determine a range of possible values for a quantity using both a lower bound and an upper bound. This range of possible values is sometimes referred to as an interval or a confidence interval.

To find the lower and upper bounds of x + y, we need to consider the possible values of x and y that would result in the maximum and minimum values of their sum when added together.

Let's start by considering the possible values of x and y that would round to 630 and 420, respectively, when rounded to the nearest 10:

x: Any number between 625 and 634 would round to 630 when rounded to the nearest 10.

y: Any number between 415 and 424 would round to 420 when rounded to the nearest 10.

To find the lower bound of x + y, we need to add the smallest possible values of x and y:

Lower bound = 625 + 415 = 1040

To find the upper bound of x + y, we need to add the largest possible values of x and y:

Upper bound = 634 + 424 = 1058

Therefore, the lower and upper bounds of x + y are 1040 and 1058, respectively.

To know more about bounds visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28725724

#SPJ1

Answer:

C hope this helps brother, I guess I really have to stall on

A perfect cube is a number that is the cube of an integer. For example, 125 is a perfect cube since 125 = 5 × 5 × 5= \(5^{3}\). Some examples of perfect cubes are 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, ..

16 does not have a perfect cube, but does have a  perfect square 4×4=16

Based on the given information in Exhibit Cape May Realty, the question is asking to test the significance of the slope coefficient at a significance level of a = 0.10. The p-value is less than 0.10, which means that the null hypothesis can be rejected. This leads to the conclusion that the population slope coefficient is different from zero. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

This means that there is a statistically significant relationship between square footage and property rental rate. As the slope coefficient is different from zero, it indicates that there is a positive or negative relationship between the two variables. However, it does not necessarily mean that there is a causal relationship. There could be other factors that influence the rental rate besides square footage.

In summary, the statistical analysis conducted on Exhibit Cape May Realty indicates that there is a significant relationship between square footage and property rental rate. Therefore, the population slope coefficient is different from zero. It is important to note that this only implies a correlation, not necessarily a causal relationship.

To know more about null hypothesis  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The ordered pairs in the relation r = {(a, b) | a divides b} on the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} are: (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 2), (2, 4), (2, 6), (3, 3), (3, 6), (4, 4), (5, 5), (6, 6).

The relation r = {(a, b) | a divides b} on the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} represents the set of ordered pairs where the first element divides the second element.

Let's determine all the ordered pairs that satisfy this relation:

For the element 1: (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (1, 6)

For the element 2: (2, 2), (2, 4), (2, 6)

For the element 3: (3, 3), (3, 6)

For the element 4: (4, 4)

For the element 5: (5, 5)

For the element 6: (6, 6)

Therefore, the ordered pairs are: (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 2), (2, 4), (2, 6), (3, 3), (3, 6), (4, 4), (5, 5), (6, 6).

To know more about ordered pairs refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28874341#

#SPJ11

Since the circle is divided into 9 equal parts, this will serve as our denominator. Each slice is 1/9 of the circle.

Since Vincent marked two parts of the circle, that measures 2/9 of the circle.

We know that one whole circle is one revolution and that is 360 degrees.

Hence, to measure the marked angle, we can use the expression:

Answer:

\(15^{4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Since 15 is being multiplied by itself four times, it is raised to the fourth power.

Answer:

C. 42 is 6 times as many as 252

Step-by-step explanation:

because 42×6 = 252

Answer:

10 - (-2) = 12, 10 + 2 = 12

Step-by-step explanation:

10 - (-2) = 12

10 + 2 = 12

Approximately 16% of the design is black.

Since the radius of each circle increases by 2 inches, the diameter of each circle increases by 4 inches. Thus, the diameter of the largest circle is 2 + 4(5) = 22 inches.

The area of each circle is proportional to the square of its radius, so the area of the smallest circle is π(\(2^2\)) = 4π square inches. The area of the second circle is π(\(4^2 - 2^2\)) = 12π square inches, the area of the third circle is π(\(6^2 - 4^2\)) = 20π square inches, and so on.

The total area of the design is the sum of the areas of all the circles, which is:

4π + 12π + 20π + 28π + 36π = 100π

The black area in the design consists of four quarter circles, each with a radius of 4 inches. The area of a one-quarter circle is:

(1/4)π(\(4^2\)) = 4π

So the total black area is 4 times this, or 16π.

The percent of the design that is black is:

(16π / 100π) x 100% ≈ 16%

Therefore, approximately 16% of the design is black.

To learn more about diameter, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/5501950

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember PEMDAS

1-1:5=

1-0.2=

0.8

The sum of the interior angles of a pentagon is 540°.

We can use this information to find the value of x by adding the rest of the interior angles and then substracting them from 540°:

It means that the correct answer is b. 155.

Answer:

B. 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Valorie made five times more baskets, so if you replace the V in the equation with how many baskets she made (55), it would look like 55=5n. Divide 55 and the n by five to get rid the five in the equation. 11=n. Thus, the answer is B.

Answer:

2 to 4 or simplified 1 to 2

Step-by-step explanation:

There 2 green marbles and 4 orange marbles so the ratio is 2 to 4

You can simplify that down to 1 to 2

Answer:

second term: 10

third term: 50

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for any geometric sequence is \(a_{n} = a_{1} *r^{n-1}\) where n is the term number you want to find, \(a_{1}\) is the first term in the sequence, and \(r\) is the common ratio. The equation for this sequence specifically uses 5 as its common ratio, so the equation is \(a_{n} =2*5^{n-1}\)

\(a_{1} = 2*5^{1-1}=2*5^{0} =2*1=2\)

\(a_{2} = 2*5^{2-1}=2*5^{1} =2*5=10\)

\(a_{3} = 2*5^{3-1}=2*5^{2} =2*25=50\)

\(a_{4} = 2*5^{4-1}=2*5^{3} =2*125=250\)

Answer:

The possible combinations of two letters is 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we want to count the possible combinations of two letters

Now, for the first letter any point in time, we have 4 letters to pick from,

For the second letter we have 3 letters to pick from

So therefore, we have the possible combinations as;

4 * 3 = 12

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The method you were doing was for permutation (nPr) and the question needs you to do the method for combinations (nCr).

To perform a one-way ANOVA, you need a dataset containing interest rates for different groups or categories. Each group should have independent samples, and the interest rates within each group should be approximately normally distributed.

To calculate the F-test statistic, we need to compare the variation between the group means to the variation within the groups. In this case, the groups are the different interest rates. The F-test statistic measures the ratio of the mean square between groups to the mean square within groups. It determines whether there is a significant difference in means across the groups. A higher F-test statistic indicates a greater difference between the group means and suggests a higher likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis. Conversely, a lower F-test statistic suggests that the group means are similar, supporting the null hypothesis.

learn more about  F-test statistic  here

brainly.com/question/30457832

#SPJ11

Answer:

OOOOOOOOHHH SHUTE BROTHER SORRY WISHED I COULD HELP but im blonde so sowwy

Dilation involves changing the size of a shape.

The scale factor of dilation that takes quadrilateral Q to quadrilateral P is 0.8

The corresponding sides of quadrilaterals Q and P are:

\(P = 2\)

\(Q = 2.5\)

So, the scale factor (k) of dilation that takes Q to P is:

\(k = \frac PQ\)

Substitute values for P and Q

\(k = \frac 2{2.5}\)

Divide 2 by 2.5

\(k = 0.8\)

This means that the scale factor is 0.8

Hence, the scale factor of dilation that takes quadrilateral Q to quadrilateral P is 0.8

Read more about dilations at:

https://brainly.com/question/11348620

Answer: 4/5

0.8 as a decimal which is the right answer options are

3/5   4/5  5/4 5/3

Set theory is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of sets, which are collections of objects. A subset is a set that contains only elements that belong to a larger set, called the universal set. In this context, let S, T, X, and Y be subsets of some universal set.

Assuming that S [T X [Y, we can conclude that if a belongs to T, then a belongs to S or a belongs to X or a belongs to Y. This is because T is a subset of S [T X [Y, and any element in T must belong to at least one of these sets.

Assuming that S \T D, we can conclude that if a belongs to T, then a does not belong to S. This is because S \T is the set of elements that belong to S but not to T, and D is the empty set, meaning that there are no elements in the set. Therefore, if a belongs to T, it cannot belong to S \T, and so it must not belong to S.

Assuming that X S, we can use all three assumptions to prove that T Y. Suppose that a belongs to T. Then, using assumption (i), we know that a belongs to S or a belongs to X or a belongs to Y. But since a cannot belong to S (using assumption (ii)), we must have either a belongs to X or a belongs to Y. But since X is a subset of S (using assumption (iii)), we know that if a belongs to X, then a belongs to S. Therefore, we must have a belongs to Y. This holds for any element a in T, so we can conclude that T Y.

Learn more about theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/14543764

#SPJ11

If we have coins = [1, 2, 5] and amount = 5, then the function should return 4, because there are four combinations of coins that make up an amount of 5: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 2], [1, 2, 2], and [5].

This problem can be solved using dynamic programming. Let's define dp[i][j] as the number of combinations of coins using the first i coins to make up an amount j. Then we can use the following recurrence relation:

dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i][j-coins[i]]

The first term on the right-hand side of the equation corresponds to the case where we don't use the i-th coin, while the second term corresponds to the case where we use the i-th coin at least once. Note that we only need to consider cases where j >= coins[i], because it's impossible to make up an amount less than the value of the i-th coin using that coin.

We can initialize dp[0][0] = 1, because there is exactly one way to make up an amount of zero using no coins. Finally, the answer to the problem is dp[n][amount], where n is the total number of coins.

Here's the Python code:

def change(amount, coins):

   n = len(coins)

   dp = [[0] * (amount+1) for _ in range(n+1)]

   dp[0][0] = 1

   for i in range(1, n+1):

       dp[i][0] = 1

       for j in range(1, amount+1):

           dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]

           if j >= coins[i-1]:

               dp[i][j] += dp[i][j-coins[i-1]]

   return dp[n][amount]

For example, if we have coins = [1, 2, 5] and amount = 5, then the function should return 4, because there are four combinations of coins that make up an amount of 5: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 2], [1, 2, 2], and [5].

Learn more about  dynamic programming

https://brainly.com/question/30868654

#SPJ4

Answer:

4/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Sample Space (List of possible outcomes)

Conditions

Space for Listed Outcomes (with conditions applied)

Probability