find the transition matrix from b to b'. b = {(1, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 0, 1)}, b' = {(−2, 3, −1, −2), (−3, 3, −1, −2), (2, −2, 1, 2), (4, −4, 2, 5)}

Answer:

y = -x +2

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b

y=6

x=-4

m=-1 (m is the slope)

b=? (b is the y-intercept)

Putting these numbers into this equation,

6 = -1(-4) + b

b=6-4

b=2

So the equation is y = -1x + 2

or just y = -x +2

The correlation coefficient is negative, indicating a negative correlation between daily income and hours of exercise.  

Therefore, we do not have sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a strong correlation between a person's daily income and how many hours they exercise.

To test the claim that there is a strong correlation between a person's daily income and how many hours they exercise, we can use the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

The null hypothesis is that there is no correlation (r = 0), and the alternative hypothesis is that there is a correlation (r ≠ 0).

To calculate the correlation coefficient, we first need to find the means and standard deviations of both variables, income and hours of exercise:

mean income = (142 + 398 + 175 + ... + 242)/20 ≈ 246.85

mean hours = (13 + 39 + 17 + ... + 25)/20 ≈ 26.4

standard deviation of income: \(s_{income}\) = 80.76

standard deviation of hours: \(s_{hours}\) = 7.65

Using these values, we can now find the correlation coefficient:

r = ∑[(income - mean income)/\(s_{income}\)][(hours - mean hours)/\(s_{hours}\)] / (n - 1),

where n is the number of pairs of data.

Plugging in the values, we get:

r = [(142-246.85)/80.76 × (13-26.4)/7.65] + [(398-246.85)/80.76 × (39-26.4)/7.65] + ... + [(242-246.85)/80.76 × (25-26.4)/7.65] / (20-1)r

≈ -0.3308

However, the value is only -0.3308, which falls within the range of weak negative correlation.

We can interpret the correlation coefficient as follows:

-1 ≤ r ≤ -0.7: strong negative correlation

-0.7 < r ≤ -0.3: moderate negative correlation

-0.3 < r ≤ -0.1: weak negative correlation

-0.1 < r ≤ 0.1: no correlation

0.1 < r ≤ 0.3: weak positive correlation

0.3 < r ≤ 0.7: moderate positive correlation

0.7 < r ≤ 1: strong positive correlation

To know more about hypothesis, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30404845

#SPJ11

Answer

1.25% expressed in fractions is (1/80).

Explanation

We need to express

1 (1/4)% = 1.25%

1.25% = (1.25/100)

Hence, 1.25% expressed in fractions is (1/80).

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

The pool holds 660,000 gallons of water.

Step-by-step explanation:

63/100 = 415,800/x

cross multiply so 415,000 * 100 = 41,500,000

41,500,000 / 63 = 660,000

All four zeros are real solutions in the polynomial equation.

What are polynomials in equations?

A polynomial is an expression that consists of one or more variables, coefficients, and non-negative integer exponents of the variables. An equation is a mathematical statement with an equal sign between two algebraic expressions with equal values. 

x⁴ – 41 x² = – 400

Adding 400 on both sides to get rid 400 from right side and set 0 on right side, we get

       x⁴ - 41x² + 400 = -400 + 400

     x⁴ - 41x² + 400 = 0

Factoring by product sum rule.

We need product of 400 and sum upto -41.

We can see that 400 = -25 × -16 = 400 and -25-16 = -41.

Therefore,

         x⁴ - 25x² - 16x²  + 400 = 0

Making it into two groups, we get

  (x⁴ - 25x²) + (-16x² + 400) = 0

Factoring out GCF of each group, we get

  x²(x² - 25) (x² - 16) = 0

(x² - 25) = x² - 5²  = (x - 5) (x + 5)

x² - 16 = x² - 4² = (x - 4)(x + 4)

(x - 5) (x + 5) (x - 4)(x + 4) = 0

Applying zero product rule,

x-5=0

x+5=0

x-4=0 and

x+4=0.

Therefore,

x = -5, -4, 4 and 5.

All four zeros are real solutions.

Learn more about polynomial equation

brainly.com/question/25958000

#SPJ1

The solution to the initial value problem dy/dx = (x - 4)(y - 5) with the initial condition y(0) = 7 is y = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + ln(2)) + 5.

To solve the initial value problem dy/dx = (x - 4)(y - 5) with the initial condition y(0) = 7, we can separate the variables and integrate.

First, let's rewrite the differential equation as:

1 / (y - 5) dy = (x - 4) dx.

Now, we integrate both sides with respect to their respective variables:

∫(1 / (y - 5)) dy = ∫(x - 4) dx.

Integrating the left side with respect to y gives:

ln|y - 5| = ∫(x - 4) dx = (1/2)x^2 - 4x + C1,

where C1 is the constant of integration.

To simplify, we can exponentiate both sides:

|y - 5| = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + C1).

Next, we consider the absolute value. Since we have an initial condition y(0) = 7, we know that y - 5 is positive when x = 0. Therefore, we can remove the absolute value sign:

y - 5 = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + C1).

Now, we solve for y:

y = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + C1) + 5.

To determine the constant of integration C1, we substitute the initial condition y(0) = 7 into the equation:

7 = e^((1/2)(0)^2 - 4(0) + C1) + 5.

Simplifying, we find:

7 = e^(C1) + 5.

e^(C1) = 7 - 5 = 2.

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

C1 = ln(2).

Finally, we substitute the value of C1 back into the equation to obtain the solution to the initial value problem:

y = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + ln(2)) + 5.

Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is y = e^((1/2)x^2 - 4x + ln(2)) + 5.

Learn more about initial value problem from:

https://brainly.com/question/30883066

#SPJ11

Answer:

5,859,375

Step-by-step explanation:

pattern is x * 5

3, 15, 75, 375, 1875, 9375, 46875. 234375, 1171875, 5859375

\(10^{th}\) term of the geometric sequence is \(\boldsymbol{5859375}\).

A geometric progression, also known as a geometric sequence, is a non-zero numerical sequence in which each term after the first is determined by multiplying the preceding one by a fixed, non-zero value known as the common ratio.

Given geometric sequence is \(\boldsymbol{3,15,75}\)

Ratio is \(r=\frac{15}{3}\) that is \(\boldsymbol{r=5}\).

\(n^{th}\) term of a geometric sequence is given by \(\boldsymbol{ar^{n-1}}\) where \(\boldsymbol{a}\) is the first term.

So,

\(10^{th}\) term of the geometric sequence \(=(3)(5)^{10-1}\)

                                                         \(=(3)(5)^{9}\\=\boldsymbol{5859375}\)

Find out more information about geometric series here:

https://brainly.com/question/3924955?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

y

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer I think you didn't care about the bad days

Step-by-step explanation:Have a nice day, thanks for the points

Answer:

52

you take 5 ÷ it by 7 the ×it by 595

A ratio is an ordered pair of numbers a and b written as a/b where b is not equal to zero.

if the number of women in the social club is 595 then the number of men in the social club is 425.

A ratio is an ordered pair of numbers a and b written  as:

a / b where b does not equal 0.

A proportion is an equation in which two ratios are equal to each other.

We have,

The ratio of men to women:

= 5:7

= 5/7

Let,

The number of men = 5x

The number of women = 7x

Now,

If the number of women = 595

We have,

7x = 595

Multiplying both sides by 5/7 we get,

5/7 x (7x) = 5/7 x 595

5x = 5/7 x 595

5x = 5 x 85

5x = 425

This means if there are 435 men in the social club if the number of women is 595.

Thus if the number of women in the social club is 595 then the number of men in the social club is 425.

Learn more about ratios and proportions here:

https://brainly.com/question/2462048

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think the answers bc, ab, and ac

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry if it ends up being wrong i had the question before but im pretty sure that's the answer.

Answer:

The length is 6 feet and the width is 4 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the length of the yard

The width can be represented by x - 2, since it is 2 less than the length.

Use the perimeter formula, P = 2l + 2w, where l is the length and w is width

Plug in the expressions and perimeter:

20 = 2x + 2(x - 2)

Solve for x:

20 = 2x + 2x - 4

20 = 4x - 4

24 = 4x

6 = x

So, the length is 6. Plug this into x - 2 to find the width

x - 2

6 - 2

= 4

So, the length is 6 feet and the width is 4 feet

Answer:

24 months.

Step-by-step explanation:

168 sellouts.

7 times per month.

So to find the amount of months, all we have to do is divide the sellouts by the times per month.

168/7=24.

24 months.

Answer:

5000-4000=1000

Step-by-step explanation:

you subtract to get your answer

Answer:

3x+12

Step-by-step explanation:

When we multipy 3 with (x+4) it becomes 3x+12

Answer:

3x+12

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x+4)

3*x=3.....keep the x with 3 because x just represents 1

3*4=12

so your answer should be

3x+12

hope this helps :)

The perimeter ratio of the figures is given as follows:

9:16.

Considering the side length ratio of a:b, the perimeter ratio has the proportion given as follows:

a:b.

This is because both the side lengths and the perimeter are measured in units, hence the perimeter ratio is the same as the side length ratio.

Considering that the area is measured in square units and the volume in cubic units, their ratios would be given as follows:

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

A) The exact cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3771.70. B)  Using the marginal cost, the approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3741.40.

(A) To find the exact cost of producing the 31st food processor, we substitute x = 31 into the cost function C(x) = 1900 + 60x - 0.3x^2:

C(31) = 1900 + 60(31) - 0.3(31)^2

C(31) = 1900 + 1860 - 0.3(961)

C(31) = 1900 + 1860 - 288.3

C(31) = 3771.7

Therefore, the exact cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3771.70.

(B) The marginal cost represents the rate of change of the cost function with respect to the quantity produced. Mathematically, it is the derivative of the cost function C(x).

Taking the derivative of C(x) = 1900 + 60x - 0.3x^2 with respect to x, we get:

C'(x) = 60 - 0.6x

To approximate the cost of producing the 31st food processor using the marginal cost, we evaluate C'(x) at x = 31:

C'(31) = 60 - 0.6(31)

C'(31) = 60 - 18.6

C'(31) ≈ 41.4

The marginal cost at x = 31 is approximately 41.4 dollars.

To approximate the cost, we add the marginal cost to the cost of producing the 30th food processor:

C(30) = 1900 + 60(30) - 0.3(30)^2

C(30) = 1900 + 1800 - 0.3(900)

C(30) = 3700

Approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor ≈ C(30) + C'(31)

≈ 3700 + 41.4

≈ 3741.4

Therefore, using the marginal cost, the approximate cost of producing the 31st food processor is $3741.40.

Learn more about marginal cost here:

brainly.com/question/14923834

#SPJ11

the point which will fall in the line is (14, 7)

Explanation:

The coordinates o f S = (2, 1)

When we draw a line from the origin (0, 0) touching the point S, we will see the next point will be (4, 2). Followed by (6, 3).

So when we look at the trend, we see that the x axis is the double of the y axis:

(2y, y) = (x, y)

(2,1 ) , (4, 2), (6, 3)

From the above, we can say the point which will fall in the line will follow that trend:

When we check the options, the only point with that trend is (14, 7).

This because (2(7), 7) = (2y, y)

Hence, the point which will fall in the line is (14, 7)

Answer:

Linda makes 3 more cards for every 1 card that Paul makes

Step-by-step explanation:

Paul can make one card for every three cards Linda makes.

Paul : Linda = 1 : 3

P/L = 1/3

3P = L (1)

Linda can make three cards for every two cards that Aaron makes.

Linda : Aaron = 3 : 2

L/A = 3/2

2L = 3A (2)

During a week Aaron makes 72 cards. How many more cards does Linda make those Paul during this week?

From (2)

L = 3/2A

A = 72

L = 3/2*72

= (3*73) / 3

= 216/2

= 108

Linda = 108

From (1)

P = 1/3L

= 1/3*108

= (1*108) / 3

= 108/3

= 36

Paul = 36

Finally, the number of cards that Linda makes more than Paul is:

Linda : Paul = 108 : 36

= 108/36

= 3/1

Linda : Paul = 3 : 1

Therefore, Linda makes 3 more cards for every 1 card that Paul makes

Answer:

20.5

Step-by-step explanation:

 Rectangle:

         length = 5 units  ;  width = 3 units

Area of rectangle = 5 * 3 = 15 square units

Trapezium:

         a  =  5 units

         b = 3 units ; h= 1 unit

a and b are the parallel sides and h is the height.

\(\sf \text{Area of trapezium = $\dfrac{(a +b)*h}{2}$}\)

                            \(\sf =\dfrac{(5+3)*1}{2}\\\\=\dfrac{8}{2}\\\\= 4 \ square \ units\)

Triangle:

        base = 3 units ; h = 1 unit

\(\sf \text{Area of triangle =$\dfrac{1}{2}*base * height$}\)

                         \(\sf = \dfrac{1}{2}*3*1\\\\\\= 1.5 \ square \ units\)

Area of the figure = Area of rectangle + area of trapezium + area of triangle

                             = 15 + 4 + 1.5

                             = 20.5 square units

The area of △ABC is  √2/5 square units.

To find the area of the triangle, we can use the formula:

Area = 1/2 * base * height

where the base and height are any two sides of the triangle. Let's use the distance formula to find the lengths of the sides:

AB = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)² ] = √[(-3 - (-1))²  + (1 - (-1))² ] = √10

AC = √[(x2 - x1)²  + (y2 - y1)² ] = √[(-4 - (-1))² + (-4 - (-1))² ] = √26

BC = √[(x2 - x1)²  + (y2 - y1)² ] = √[(-4 - (-3))²  + (-4 - 1)² ] = √18

Let's use AB as the base and drop a perpendicular from C to AB to find the height:

The slope of AB is (1 - (-1))/(-3 - (-1)) = -1/2. Therefore, the slope of the perpendicular line through C is 2 (negative reciprocal).

The equation of the line through C is y - (-4) = 2(x - (-4)), which simplifies to y = 2x - 4.

To find the intersection of this line with AB, we solve the system of equations:

y = -1/2 x + 1

y = 2x - 4

Solving for x, we get x = -3/5, and therefore y = 11/5.

The height of the triangle is the distance from C to the point (-3/5, 11/5) on AB, which is:

h = |(-4) - (2(-3/5)) - (-4)| = 2/5

Finally, we can plug in the values into the formula for the area:

Area = 1/2 * AB * h = 1/2 * √10 * 2/5 = √2/5

Learn more about triangle at https://brainly.com/question/16860956

#SPJ11

The boiling point of a solution containing 310.3 grams of NiCl3 in 55 mL of water is higher than the boiling point of pure water.

To calculate the boiling point of the solution, we need to consider the effect of the solute (NiCl3) on the boiling point of water. The boiling point elevation (∆Tb) can be calculated using the formula:

∆Tb = Kb * m

Where Kb is the molal boiling point elevation constant and m is the molality of the solution. To find the molality, we need to calculate the moles of solute (NiCl3) and the mass of the solvent (water).

Moles of NiCl3 = Mass / Molar mass

Molar mass of NiCl3 = 58.69 g/mol + (35.45 g/mol * 3) = 164.29 g/mol

Moles of NiCl3 = 310.3 g / 164.29 g/mol = 1.886 mol

Mass of water = Volume * Density

Mass of water = 55 mL * 0.997 g/mL = 54.835 g

Molality (m) = Moles of solute / Mass of solvent

Molality (m) = 1.886 mol / 0.054835 kg = 34.380 mol/kg

Now, we can use the molality to calculate the boiling point elevation (∆Tb). The molal boiling point elevation constant (Kb) for water is approximately 0.512 °C/m.

∆Tb = 0.512 °C/m * 34.380 mol/kg = 17.610 °C

Finally, we add the boiling point elevation (∆Tb) to the boiling point of pure water, which is 100 °C.

Boiling point of the solution = 100 °C + 17.610 °C = 117.610 °C

Therefore, the boiling point of the solution containing 310.3 grams of NiCl3 in 55 mL of water is higher than the boiling point of pure water.

For more questions like Molality click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30640726

#SPJ11

The option that which based on these points is Simple Linear regression will have high bias and low variance and polynomial of degree 3 will have low bias and high variance

So, the correct answer is B. 1 and 3.

If we use simple linear regression (degree 1) to fit this data, it would have high bias and low variance, as it would underfit the data by having only one feature. Therefore, we would miss most of the data’s details, which may lead to erroneous conclusions.

On the other hand, the polynomial of degree 3 would have low bias and high variance, as it would fit the data perfectly and capture all of its features, but it would fail to generalize well to new data, causing overfitting.

This is due to the fact that the model is too complicated and follows the data too closely. So, it will have high variance.A model with low bias and low variance is preferred as it will have good performance on both the training and test

Hence, the Answer is B.

Learn more about polynomial regression at

https://brainly.com/question/32270007

#SPJ11

Answer:

-0.6 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a(b+c) = (ab)+(ac)

by property of distribution

a(b+c) = ab + ac

Answer:

\( - 3x = 4.2 \\ - x = \frac{4.2}{3} \\ - x = 1.4 \\ x = - 1.4 \\ thank \: you\)

<HFG ≅ <JHI because they are corresponding angles, therefore: A. Cai used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

When two parallel lines are crossed by a transversal, the angles that are formed in matching corners along the transversal are regarded as corresponding angles which are congruent to each other.

In the proof, HFG and JHI are corresponding angles that are forrmed. Therefore, they are equal based on the fact that corresponding angles are congruent.

Thus, Cai's first error in the proof was made in his 4th statement. <HFG ≅ <JHI because they are corresponding anglles, therefore: A. Cai used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

Learn more about corresponding angles on:

https://brainly.com/question/2009183

Answer:Answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

just did it on khan academy

If 100 students participate in the fundraiser, each student needs to raise $137.50.If 25 students participate in the fundraiser, each student needs to raise amount $550.

Amount = (Total Amount Needed) ÷ (Number of Students)

For 60 students:

Amount = $275 ÷ 60 = $4.58

For 75 students:

Amount = $275 ÷ 75 = $3.67

For 40 students:

Amount = $275 ÷ 40 = $6.88

To solve this problem, we need to use a simple equation: Amount = (Total Amount Needed) ÷ (Number of Students). We can then plug in the given information to calculate the amount each student needs to raise. For example, if 50 students participate in the fundraiser, we can calculate that each student needs to raise $275 ÷ 50 = $5.50. We can then use this equation to calculate the amount that each student needs to raise if there are different numbers of students participating in the fundraiser. For example, if there are 100 students participating in the fundraiser, each student needs to raise $275 ÷ 100 = $2.75. Similarly, if there are 25 students participating in the fundraiser, each student needs to raise $275 ÷ 25 = $11.00.

Learn more about amount here

https://brainly.com/question/8082054

#SPJ4

Start from 7, then add 5 each time.

a7 is 7 plus 30, or 37.

Answer:

\(x=\frac{-9\pm3\sqrt{5} }{2}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Standard Form: ax² + bx + c = 0

Quadratic Formula: \(x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac} }{2a}\)

Step 1: Write equation

x² + 9x + 9 = 0

Since we cannot factor the expression, we will have to use the quadratic formula.

Step 2: Define

a = 1

b = 9

c = 9

Step 3: Solve for x

Answer:

 X1= -9-3\(\sqrt5\)  over 2    X2= -9+3\(\sqrt5\) over 2  (draw a line under the -9 to the 5

                                                                         and put a 2 under like a fraction

                                                                          i cant get the line all the way

                                                                          across on here   sorry

Step by step explanation:

x= -9 \(\sqrt9^2 -4x1x9\)    Over (draw a line under that) Put all that under sq root

             2 x 1                        also

x= -9+ \(\sqrt81-36\)         Over 2

           2

x= -9 + \(\sqrt45\)                 Over 2

         2

x=-9 +3\(\sqrt5\)                   Over 2

        2

separate solutions    gives your answer above  

Also ......note ..... put a line under each  + sign  ok I worked hard getting this all down best i can