Answers
Expert witnesses testify in more than 90 percent of trials today. The reason behind this is that there are complex cases these days that require the help of an expert to explain the concept to the jurors.
What is an expert witness?An expert witness is someone who possesses knowledge and skills in a specific area and who has been certified by the court to testify in a trial about their findings or opinions.
Expert witnesses are called in legal proceedings to provide evidence of a technical, scientific, or specialized nature that may be beyond the understanding of jurors or the court.
An expert witness is called to give a neutral opinion based on their expertise in a particular field of study or industry.
Learn more about witnesses at:
https://brainly.com/question/29596349
#SPJ11
Currently, expert witnesses testify in more than 90% of trials.
An expert witness is an individual who has a great deal of knowledge and expertise in a particular field and has been called upon to offer professional opinions in a court of law. The knowledge, expertise, and experience that an expert witness has are typically beyond the scope of a normal individual. They are able to testify in court and provide their expert opinions based on their experiences as well as their understanding of the case. The majority of the expert witness work that is carried out is provided in a court of law. The expert witness's primary function in the courtroom is to provide evidence that supports a particular argument or opinion that is being presented by one of the parties in the case. Expert witnesses can be called on in both civil and criminal cases, and they may be called upon to testify in a variety of different fields.
To know more about witnesses, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32240223
#SPJ11
Related Questions
What does it mean to have a public defender?
That a defendant is representing him-or herself.
That a defendant was found guilty of the crime.
That a defendant gives up the right to a jury trial.
That a defendant cannot afford to pay an attorney.
Answers
Help please ! Will Mark Brainly!
Answers
Answer:
I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B
Internet access has a measurable effect on political participation. Identify those groups that have greater and lesser access to the Internet.
*higher income
*less educated
*lower income
*more educated
-more access
-less access
Answers
Internet access has been shown to have a measurable effect on political participation.
Research has shown that internet access can have a measurable effect on political participation, allowing citizens to access information, communicate with others, and engage in online activism. However, not all groups have equal access to the internet, which can create digital divides in political participation. Below are some groups that have greater or lesser access to the internet:
Groups with greater access to the internet:
Higher income: People with higher income are more likely to have access to broadband internet and other technology devices, which can facilitate online political participation.More educated: People with higher levels of education are more likely to have digital skills and literacy, as well as access to online resources, which can enhance their political engagement.Groups with lesser access to the internet:
Less educated: People with lower levels of education may lack the skills or resources to use the internet effectively, which can limit their political participation.Lower income: People with lower income may face barriers to internet access, such as high costs or limited infrastructure, which can restrict their ability to engage in online political activities.Overall, the digital divide in internet access can have significant implications for political participation, as it may exclude some groups from participating in the democratic process and limit their ability to influence political outcomes. Efforts to bridge this divide, such as increasing internet infrastructure and providing digital literacy training, can help to promote greater inclusivity and democratic participation.
Learn more about internet access: https://brainly.com/question/529836
#SPJ11
Who has the right-of-way at a four-way stop?
Answers
Answer:
If 2 or even more cars reach a 4 stop junction at the same moment, the automobile to the right seems to have the right of way after halting. Red light is flashing - It really should be interpreted as a stop sign; halt and yield to vehicles travelling in the adjoining road.
In your own opinion, why do you think the Philippine National Police is national in scope and civilian in character. Explain your answer.
Answers
The Philippine Constabulary served as the core of a national police force that combined these disparate and fragmented local police groups.
A new Constitution was adopted during the People's Revolution in 1986 and it established a police force that is "national in scope and civilian in character."
OUR COMMAND
The Philippine National Police Reform and Reorganization Act of 1998, as revised by Republic Act 6975, An Act Establishing the Philippine National Police under a Reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government and Other Purposes, and further amended by Republic Act 9708.
OUR PHILIPPIA
Justice, Service, and Honor
OUR PRINCIPLES
Maka-Diyos (Pro-God) (Pro-God)
Makabayan (Pro-Country)
Makatao (Pro-People)
Makakalikasan (Pro-Environment)
Learn more about Philippine Constabulary here:
https://brainly.com/question/26599508
#SPJ9
rite
levelopment? W
What sorts of changes have
been observing in your society
comparison to the last three yea
Prepare a short note based on it.
art Making Activity
Answers
Answer:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs.
Explanation:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs are the changes have been observing in the society as comparison to the last three years. Technology such as transportation, devices, medical and other industrial instruments and media devices are more advanced as compared to previous years. Due to these devices, people depend more on technology which is a source of easiness as well as causes adverse effect on health of people.
georgia vs waller argument
Answers
Hi!
In this case, the court decided that the "aims and interests" of open trials are "no less pressing in a hearing to suppress wrongfully seized evidence."
information retrieved from the oral hearing
Hope this helps! :0)
describe the effects of the 13th 14th and 15th amendments, including the purpose and unintended consequences or challenges with enforcement of those amendments
Answers
Answer: The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, were designed to ensure equality for recently emancipated slaves.
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
Answers
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
You are legal counsel to the president. One of the Supreme Court justices has just announced his resignation. Many groups and individuals are suggesting names of people they think should be nominated by the president. Write a memo to the presi- dent describing the type of person who should be nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Answers
Presidents typically pick judges who appear to share their political beliefs. To put it another way, a president who holds liberal views will typically nominate liberals to the judiciary.
What is the Supreme court of the US?“EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" -
The supreme duty of the United States Supreme Court is summed up in these words, which are inscribed above the entrance gate to the Supreme Court Building. For all issues and conflicts arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the last arbitrator of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
The Chief Justice of the United States sits on the Supreme Court, together with whichever many Associate Justices Congress deems appropriate. According to 28 U. S. C. 1, there are now eight Associate Justices. The President of the United States has the authority to appoint Justices, and such decisions are made with the advice and agreement of the Senate.
Therefore, Presidents pick judges who appear to share their political beliefs. To put it another way, a president who holds liberal views will typically nominate liberals to the judiciary.
Read more about the Supreme Court, here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ2
Which of the following would disqualify an act from being considered fraud?
A. There was no force or threat of force used in the act.
O B. The individual accused of fraud knew that his statements were
false.
C. No loss was suffered nor intended.
D. The deception took place via mail rather than in person.
Answers
Answer:
The deception took place via rather than in person.
Answer:
C. No loss was suffered nor intended
Explanation:
How do political parties help candidate win elections?
Answers
Answer:
the political parties support the candidate and help with buying the materials to "put the candidate out there"
What do property tax and sales tax have in common
Answers
The thing that the have in common is some of that money goes to the government.
janet is called for jury duty and is selected for possible service on a jury. however, when the defendant's attorney sees her, he notices that she is wearing a green dress. both the defendant and the defendant's attorney hate green dresses, so they strike her name from the jury. this is:
Answers
А _____ system takes into consideration the educational requirements,
skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the
wage gap.
A. comparable worth
B. substantially equal worth
C. comparable titles
D. comparable working conditions
Answers
A comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.
What is meant by a comparable worth system?This is the term that is used to refer to the system that takes cognition of the work that is done by the females and the minorities and tries to bridge the gap that existed with the pay that the men receive.
Hence we can say that the comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.
Read more on wage systems here: https://brainly.com/question/25863464
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a FCC principle for EMS related responsibility?
Answers
Answer:
hhhhhkskskskskskisssss
The tendency to desire and seek out positive outcomes and avoid negative ones would best be considered a(n)
Answers
Answer:
⠀Positive one.
FOLLOW ME
MARK BRAINLIEST
Show an adequate demonstration of the relationship between
uncertainties and
risk against time on a graph.
Answers
In risk analysis, it is essential to assess potential losses and the likelihood of their occurrence. Uncertainties are quantified as probabilities and represented by a risk curve, which depicts the relationship between risk and time. The shape of the risk curve varies based on the level of risk and the duration under consideration.
Typically, the curve starts at a low probability, gradually increases to a peak representing the maximum probable risk level, and then declines.
This peak serves as a reference point for risk assessment.
Risk curves are constructed using historical data on past hazards, such as natural disasters or accidents, along with the associated probabilities.
In summary, uncertainties and risks are interconnected, and a risk curve effectively portrays the temporal evolution of risk.
Read more about uncertainties
https://brainly.com/question/14650744
#SPJ11
What is the significance of the 2010 supreme court decision citizens united v. Federal election commission?.
Answers
Answer:
Citizens United v. FEC
Article Talk
Language
Watch
Edit
"Citizens United" redirects here. For the political organization, see Citizens United (organization). For other uses, see Citizens United (disambiguation).
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The court held 5-4 that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. FEC that corporations are people and abolished sensible political donation caps, allowing a select few wealthy donors and special interests to utilize dark money to sway elections.
Why was the Federal Election Commission created?For the purpose of overseeing and upholding the Federal Election Campaign Act, the Federal Election Commission was founded in 1975. The sources and sums of contributions that can be used to support federal elections are restricted by this law, and it also mandates that the sources and use of all contributions be made public.
The Federal Election Commission ruled that companies could be prohibited from using political advertisements. For independent expenditures and electioneering communications, the Court affirmed the reporting and disclaimer requirements. The prohibition on corporate contributions was unaffected by the Court's decision.
Learn more about the united v. Federal election commission here:
https://brainly.com/question/20364118
#SPJ4
(a) What is the definition of a contract?
(b) What are the required elements?
Answers
Answer: A contract is a written agreement that you follow by. For example an NBA Player signs a Contract to a Team and he has to play there for the amount of time with their rules and plays for the amount of money said.
The required elements of a contract are, offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, legality, and sometimes a written instrument
Explanation:
Must you have clear evidence to put away a criminal? Or can you have some evidence but not as valuable.
(What kind of evidence puts away a criminal)
Answers
How frequently do you think corruption and misconduct occur in policing? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Depends on what people think this is an opinionated question but here is what I thinks:
Explanation:
Not very often; as of 2020 with the murder of George Floyd people are way more decisive on police officers and how they do there job. This does not happen often. Up to many times of people saying corruption and police brutality there has been proof of someone handeling a gun, not co-operating, or being a threat. Im not saying it does ot happen but we need to look deeper than what we see and think.
the ucc requires that the mirror image rule be followed for all acceptances. T/F
Answers
False. The statement is not entirely accurate. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not explicitly require the mirror image rule to be followed for all acceptances.
The mirror image rule states that an acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer exactly for a valid contract to be formed.
However, the UCC provides certain exceptions and modifications to the mirror image rule in commercial transactions. Under the UCC, an acceptance with additional or different terms can still create a valid contract, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on the offeror's assent to the additional or different terms. Therefore, the UCC allows for some flexibility in the acceptance process beyond the strict application of the mirror image rule.
To know more about the Uniform Commercial Code visit:
brainly.com/question/30869012
#SPJ11
Suppose that, under a new city ordinance, police officers would have a choice when it comes to dealing with persons possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. relying on their discretion, officers could (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time; or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation. would this be a just and fair policy? would it make it easier or more difficult for police officers to protect the community? why or why not?
Answers
Under the proposed city ordinance, police officers would have discretion when dealing with individuals possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. They could either (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation.
Whether this policy is just and fair depends on various factors, such as the potential for unequal treatment, the prioritization of law enforcement resources, and the impacts on the community. On one hand, allowing officer discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential biases in how offenders are treated. On the other hand, treating minor marijuana possession as a traffic violation could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow officers to focus on more serious crimes.
As for the impact on police officers protecting the community, this policy could make it easier for them to allocate resources more effectively and concentrate on higher-priority issues. However, if discretion is not applied consistently and fairly, it could create mistrust and tensions within the community. Ultimately, the success of this policy would depend on how effectively it is implemented and monitored.
To know more about the Illegality of Marijuana Possession- https://brainly.com/question/29800924
#SPJ11
what destroys respect
Answers
Factors influencing the rate of elimination of alcohol include
Answers
Answer:
Factors influencing the rate of elimination also include tolerance, rate of consumption, and gender. At an elimination rate of 0.015% BAC per hour: It takes 3.3 hours to eliminate 0.05% BAC.
Understanding the Federal Justice System
Please choose the correct answer.
Which aspect of the federal judiciary
is specifically established in the
Constitution?
O The three-tiered structure of the
federal court system
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
O The number of justices serving
on the Supreme Court
The number of judges in the
entire federal court system
Answers
Answer:
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
Explanation:
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.
III . Think and write: Which statements refer to civil laws and which statement refer to criminal laws
1) A law that deals with people’s rights . ______
2) A law that is designed to protect people from others . _________
3) With this law, disputes are settled by a jury. __________
4) A law that deals with people who break national laws. ________
5) A law that is designed to keep society safe . ___________
Answers
1) A law that deals with people’s rights—civil law.
2) A law that is designed to protect people from others—criminal law.
What is Civil law?Civil law is an international legal system that has its roots in mainland Europe. Roman law serves as the intellectual foundation for the civil law system, and its key concepts have been codified into a referable system, which is the main source of legislation.
3) With this law, disputes are settled by a jury-Civil law.
4) A law that deals with people who break national laws-Criminal law.
5) A law that is designed to keep society safe—Civil law.
The corpus of law that deals with crimes are known as criminal law. It forbids behavior that is deemed to pose a threat to, be detrimental to, or otherwise pose a risk to the possessions, health, safety, and moral well-being of others, including oneself.
Therefore, statements related to civil laws and criminal laws are stated above.
Learn more about Civil law, here;
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
CHAPTER 6: END CASE DISCUSSION
Case Study 6.1: Surface Bargaining
Decision:
The arbitrator found that the substance of the company’s proposals and its inability or refusal to alter any of its proposals did result in bad faith bargaining. In addition, the arbitrator found that the company’s response to the union’s objections to the breadth of its original management rights and zipper clauses was to submit new proposals that were even broader. Clearly, the arbitrator found that the company’s insistence on proposals that were unusually harsh, and would result in the employees having fewer rights than they had before the contract, was an unfair labor practice.
Questions for Discussion
1. Was the company bargaining in good faith? Explain your answer.
Yes: There is no requirement that the parties agree—just that they meet and bargain. The company was bargaining, although agreement was not reached.
No: Although the company appeared to be bargaining, its refusal to agree to fairly routine demands indicated it did not actually intend to bargain, that is, the give-and-take necessary to successful bargaining.
2. Which company proposal was the most important in determining the in good faith issue?
Number 8—refusing to put a nondiscrimination clause in the agreement even while acknowledging that such was already available. (Any point with some reasoning would be correct.)
Answers
No, the company was not bargaining in good faith.
The arbitrator found that the company's proposals were unusually harsh and would result in employees having fewer rights than before. Additionally, the company refused to alter any of its proposals and submitted even broader proposals in response to the union's objections.
This shows a lack of willingness to engage in give-and-take necessary for successful bargaining, indicating bad faith bargaining.
To know more about company bargaining visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32938330
#SPJ11
9. Explain the difference between valid, void, and voidable
contracts.
Answers
A valid contract is legally enforceable, a void contract has no legal effect, and a voidable contract is initially valid but can be voided by one or more parties due to specific circumstances.
Valid Contract:A valid contract is a legally enforceable agreement that meets all the essential elements required for its formation. These elements typically include:
Offer: One party makes a clear and specific proposal to another party.Acceptance: The other party accepts the offer without any conditions or modifications.Void Contract:A void contract, also known as a void ab initio contract, is a contract that is considered null and invalid from the beginning. It lacks legal effect and cannot be enforced by either party. A void contract may arise in situations such as:
Illegal Purpose: The contract's objective is illegal or against public policy from the outset.Lack of Capacity: One or both parties lack legal capacity to enter into the contract, such as minors or mentally incapacitated individuals.Voidable Contract:A voidable contract is a contract that is initially valid and enforceable, but due to certain defects or circumstances, one party has the option to either affirm the contract or void it. Some common situations that may render a contract voidable include:
Misrepresentation: One party provides false information or conceals material facts, inducing the other party to enter into the contract.Duress: One party is coerced or forced into the contract through threats or undue influence.To know more about valid contract
brainly.com/question/6491012
#SPJ11