With the adoption of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the US began to address the need to prevent or minimize workplace accidents and health hazards.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) was passed in 1970 and is administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The purpose of the act is to ensure that employers provide their workers with a workplace that is free from recognized hazards, such as exposure to toxic chemicals, excessive noise levels, mechanical dangers, and unsanitary conditions. OSHA sets and enforces standards for workplace safety and health, provides training and education, and conducts inspections to ensure compliance. The act has been credited with significantly reducing the number of workplace injuries and deaths since its passage.
To know more about Workplace accidents:
https://brainly.com/question/30686624
#SPJ11
(repost since it got taken down but non of the fakes did ) to everyone whos copy and pasting the paragraph EVERYONE STOP DOING WHAT YOUR DOING AND GO TO THE LEADERBOARDS ALL OF THOS PEOPLE PUT FAKE ANSWERS. AND BRAINLY MODS IF UR READING THIS DELETE ANLL THEIR ANSWERS ALSO FREE POINTS please stop your lagging out the brainly servers for me and everyone else using this site so please plan your attack on the fakes later please or even tomorrow thank you.
Answer:
dang...
Explanation:
well, don't worry. I don't copy and paste c.ra.p everywhere-
I agree, spamming is definitely not the right way to protest since peaceful people just trying to get help on their work are being affected by this.
may I have Brainliest? I'm stuck on Expert ( ╯︿╰ )
Answer:
thx
Explanation:
Describe the characteristics that make organized crime a unique type of criminality. Explain why defining organized crime is difficult. Explain and discuss the organizational structure of an organized crime group. Discuss the basic qualifications for membership in an organized crime group. What are the advantages and disadvantages of membership in an organized crime group?
Organized crime is a unique form of criminality characterized by a structured, hierarchical, and coordinated approach to illegal activities. The key characteristics that make organized crime distinct: Structure and Hierarchy, Coordinated Criminal Activities, Longevity and Permanence etc.
What are the responses to other questions?Below are the characteristics of an organized crime:
1. Structure and Hierarchy: Organized crime groups have a well-defined organizational structure with clear lines of authority and division of labor.
2. Coordinated Criminal Activities: These activities are carried out strategically and often span multiple jurisdictions.
3. Longevity and Permanence: Organized crime groups aim for long-term survival and establish durable criminal enterprises.
B Defining organized crime is challenging due to several reasons:
1. Complexity and Adaptability.
2. Global Nature
3. Lack of Uniformity.
The organizational structure of an organized crime group typically follows a hierarchical model, similar to a corporation which include:
1. Boss/Leader: The highest-ranking individual who holds ultimate authority and makes critical decisions for the group.
2. Underboss: The second-in-command who assists the boss and takes over in their absence.
3. Capos/Captains: These individuals are in charge of smaller units or factions within the organization.
4. Soldiers/Associates: They often report to the capos and follow their orders.
Membership in an organized crime group typically requires specific qualifications:
1. Criminal Skills and Experience:
2. Loyalty and Trustworthiness:
3. Networking and Connections
Advantages of membership in an organized crime group:
1. Financial Gain
2. Power and Influence
Disadvantages of membership in an organized crime group:
1. Legal Consequences
2. Internal Rivalries and Violence
3. Limited Exit Options
It is crucial to note that the disadvantages and risks associated with organized crime far outweigh the potential benefits.
learn more about Organized crime: https://brainly.com/question/30457855
#SPJ1
Thinking about the circular flow of income and the data you just analyzed, compose one well-written paragraph that
shows how you can apply the circular flow of income to the questions you just answered. In your writing, be sure to use
proper economic terminology, such as the labels in the circular flow model e.
Answer:
Circular flow of income is a theory that states that economy is a system of dependencies, flows of goods, services, factors of production and payments between all participants of economic life. It shows how the exchange process works, in which the government, enterprises, and households participate.
Households are fed by streams of payments in the form of wages, pensions and other similar benefits. Then they dispose of their income in such a way that they return some of the streams in the form of taxes, some leave as savings, in return for which they receive services and goods of public interest. The remaining stream of payments after these operations is passed back to enterprises (as a result of the purchase of goods and services).
Businesses, like households, spend part of their income on taxes and savings, receiving in return government investment from the state. Businesses obtain streams of labor and production services from households and can therefore produce goods.
Answer:
As consumer spending increased, less savings were placed in the financial sector. This resulted in reduced business investment. The government also spent less, meaning it injected less money into the economy. There was a trade deficit because imports were greater than exports. This means there was more leakage through imports than there was money injected through exports.
Explanation:
edmentum
Give your own view on human trafficking in South Africa
Answer: Human trafficing is a harsh this that must be stopped that hurts many people and family as well.But trafficking is a reality in South Africa. ... This means victims are trafficked from here to other countries; foreign victims are moved through the country to other areas for exploitation, while foreign victims are brought to the country as their final destination. It is real and I pray it will be stopped!
Explanation:The University of Johannesburg reports that trafficking occurs at a slightly higher rate for girls than boys, with 55.5% of all trafficked people in South Africa being female, and 44.5% being male. It is estimated that more than three-quarters of all victims are between the ages of 12–25.
Human trafficking in South Africa occurs as a practice of forced labor and exploitation among exported and imported men, women, and children.
What do you mean by human trafficking?Human trafficking refers to the unlawful act of coercing people so that benefits can be received from their work or service.
Human trafficking in South Africa is a practice of forced labor and exploitation of trafficked men, women, and many children.
Learn more about human trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/24024401
#SPJ2
company that is in the market with a few buying options for the consumer is enjoying a high amount of which of porter's five competitive forces
Porter's Five Competitive Forces is a framework introduced by Michael Porter to analyze the competitiveness of an industry. It consists of five competitive forces, including the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute products or services, and the intensity of competitive rivalry. The strength of each of these competitive forces determines the overall competitiveness of the industry.
If a student company is enjoying a high amount of success in the market, it is likely that one or more of these competitive forces are working in its favor. Let's examine each of these competitive forces in detail:
Threat of new entrants: This refers to the ease with which new companies can enter the market and compete with existing companies. If there are high barriers to entry, such as patents, economies of scale, or brand recognition, it becomes more difficult for new entrants to compete, which strengthens the position of existing companies.
Bargaining power of buyers: This refers to the ability of buyers to negotiate lower prices or better terms from suppliers. If buyers have a lot of bargaining power, it can put pressure on the student company to lower its prices or improve its offerings.
Bargaining power of suppliers: This refers to the ability of suppliers to negotiate higher prices or better terms from buyers. If suppliers have a lot of bargaining power, it can put pressure on the student company to pay more for inputs, which can affect its profitability.
Threat of substitute products or services: This refers to the existence of alternative products or services that can be used to satisfy the same need. If there are many substitutes available, it becomes more difficult for the student company to maintain its market position.
Intensity of competitive rivalry: This refers to the level of competition between existing companies in the market. If there is intense competition, it becomes more difficult for the student company to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage.
It's important to note that the strength of these competitive forces can change over time, so it's important for the student company to continually monitor and analyze its market and competition. By understanding the competitive forces at play in its market, the student company can make informed decisions to improve its competitiveness and achieve long-term success.
For more about competitive forces:
https://brainly.com/question/14765938
#SPJ11
true or false. a basic function of government is to protect its citizens from internal and external enemies
The given statement, "A basic function of government is to protect its citizens from internal and external enemies" is true because it is essential for maintaining social order and ensuring the safety and security of its citizens.
Internally, a government is responsible for protecting its citizens from threats such as crime, terrorism, and civil unrest. This involves the establishment of law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions to maintain law and order, ensure public safety, and administer justice.
Externally, a government is responsible for protecting its citizens from external threats such as invasion, terrorism, or other forms of aggression from other countries or groups. This involves maintaining a strong military and diplomatic corps to defend against such threats and to negotiate treaties and agreements with other nations to promote peace and stability.
To know more about government, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
a federally related transaction is one in which the loan won't be sold on the secondary market and isn't guaranteed or insured by the federal government.
A federally related mortgage loan is one that is either insured or guaranteed by a federal agency. These loans may be sold on the secondary market.
Therefore, the statement provided is incorrect.
Guaranteed by federal agency or entity such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), or the Rural Housing Service (RHS). These loans may be sold on the secondary market, but they are still considered to be federally related transactions because they are backed by a federal agency.
A federally related transaction is a real estate transaction in which a federal financial institution regulatory agency has regulatory authority, and it includes certain types of mortgage loans.
These transactions are subject to various federal laws and regulations, such as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), which sets forth guidelines for real estate transactions involving a federally related mortgage loan.
It's important to have a clear understanding of what constitutes a federally related transaction, as they are subject to specific rules and regulations that are designed to protect consumers and ensure transparency in real estate transactions.
To know more about mortgage loan here:
https://brainly.com/question/29538161
#SPJ4
Explain and summarize the process the police must follow when it comes to providing a person their Miranda Warnings.
There’s not one target net worth value that is universally considered to be “rich” or “wealthy.” But right now, Sanya’s net worth is $12,000. Her goal is to have a net worth of at least $100,000 before she turns 35.
Setting specific financial goal, such as increasing one's net worth, is a great way to work towards financial security and stability.
What is security?Security refers to the measures taken to protect people, information, assets, and systems from harm or unauthorized access. It involves the use of various techniques and technologies to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of resources. Security is essential in today's digital age as threats to information and systems have become increasingly sophisticated and prevalent.
Common security measures include encryption, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, access controls, and security audits. Security is a complex and constantly evolving field, and it requires ongoing efforts to stay ahead of potential threats. The goal of security is to provide a safe and secure environment for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
To learn more about net worth, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16004568
#SPJ1
Complete Question
Use a student loans to finance education in order to earn a higher salary.Use a mortgage to buy a house that appreciates substantially in value. Take a personal loan to launch a small business or side hustle that allows her to save or invest more
There's not one target net worth value that is universally considered to be "rich" or "wealthy." But right now, Sanya's net worth is $12,000. Her goal is to have a net worth of at least $100,000 before she turns 35.Explain one way that using credit could help Sanya achieve her goal?
how is the fourth amendment and eight amendment similar
The relationship that the eighth and the fourth amendment have is that they are both amendments that talks about the way that the police have to act with the citizens of the nation.
What is the fourth amendment?This is the term that is used to refer to the amendment of the United States that forbids all forms of unreasonable searches by the police without first getting a warrant from the court of law.
What is the eight amendment?This is the amendment in the nation that forbids all forms of cruel punishments and excessive bail condition on the people by the police form of the United States.
Read more on the amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
How does the TSA enforce security regulations on
airports? Are there any limits to this enforcement and what are the
penalties for non-compliance?
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.
The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.
To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562
#SPJ11
Instructions: Please answer the following questions. Please make sure that your response is 100 words or more for each question.
1. Should additional penalties be imposed on people found guilty of committing bias crimes?
2. Do you feel that in most cases the police in your area are sensitive to crime victims' needs?
3. Do you think a police officer can be considered a :victim of crime" when carrying out their duties, having acknowledged and accepted the dangers ever-present in such a career.
Answer:
Under federal hate crime legislation, bias-motivated violence is punishable by ten years to life in prison, and some bias-motivated crimes are punishable by the death penalty. (18 U.S.C. §§ 245, 249.) For more information on federal prosecutions, see Federal Prosecutions for Civil Rights Violations. Civil Remedies
Explanation:
Once you find the court's decisions made during this current term, choose one of the cases to find the answers to the questions given below. The case may be lengthy so pay close attention to the
From an objective perspective, it would be safe to say that a police officer, as a citizen, could be the victim any conceivable crime. In practice, however, exceptions do arise. Here are just a few examples from my experience: From the PA Crimes Code: Section 3127. Indecent Exposure.
Which of the following is a difference between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution that is a response to a problem expressed in the passage?
A) The Articles of Confederation lacked federal executive and judicial branches, whereas the United States Constitution did not.
B) The Articles of Confederation allowed for the federal government to request revenues from states but did not permit it to tax citizens directly, whereas under the United States Constitution the federal government could tax citizens directly.
C) Under the Articles of Confederation, members of the national legislature were paid by the state governments, whereas under the United States Constitution they were paid by the federal government.
D) Under the Articles of Confederation, members of the national legislature were not able to regulate currency, whereas under the United States Constitution the federal government regulates currency.
Option (B) is correct. The federal government was permitted by the Articles of Confederation to ask the states for money, but it was not allowed to tax people directly; this was changed by the United-States Constitution.
Articles had been unicameral, had no strength of tax, had no status military, and there has been no change process. Constitution is bicameral, has the rights to levy taxes, has a military, have change process. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to alter commerce, making it not able to shield or standardize exchange among overseas countries and the diverse states.
Outwardly patterned on a lot of the US, it had 3 obtrusive modifications: 1) the Preamble makes clean that is a federal authorities of Sovereign, Independent States, 2) they invoked 'the choose of Almighty God', and 3) they outlawed the Slave Trade absolutely, a primary in American Constitutional law. Articles are the sections of the report that describe the powers and features of the authorities. The U.S. Constitution has 7 articles at the same time as the Florida Constitution has 12 articles. 21. Amendments are modifications which have been made to a constitution.
Learn more about Confederation visit: brainly.com/question/19875019
#SPJ4
If you were a Supreme Court Justice hearing a case involving legality of the death penalty, the issue mostly likely at hand
would be
the First Amendment.
O the Fifth Amendment.
the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
the right to privacy.
In a case regarding the legitimacy of the death penalty, the Fifth Amendment would most certainly be the subject of discussion if I were a Supreme Court justice.
Does the death penalty fall under the Fifth Amendment's protections?According to the Fifth Amendment, a grand jury must present an indictment or presentment before a person can be held accountable for a crime that carries the death penalty or other severe penalties It is prohibited to prosecute or punish someone more than once for the same offense .
Why should the death penalty be legalized?2,000,000 US residents, according to Time Magazine, have reportedly been victims of crimes ranging from murder to assault. Criminals would become irresponsible and fearless without the death sentence, committing crimes with greater frequency.
To know more abourt Supreme Court Justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11929760
#SPJ1
What is the concept of Death Penalty in Islam?
What’s an event that involves matter and energy
Question 6 of 10
What is one major problem created by globalization?
Answer:
Since developing countries like China and India can offer same products at cheaper rates, developed countries like the US are also bound to reduce their prices to stay in the competition.
Explanation:
hope this helped lol
Please provide an example of a scenario where a police officer would, or would not, be legally entitled to stop and potentially frisk someone. Please explain why this is or is not legal.
Answer:
When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street?
A look at the history of "stop and frisk," and the circumstances required to make its use legal.
by Marcia Layton Turner
updated September 04, 2020 · 3 min read
Man standing by crosswalk
The United States' “stop and frisk" rule originated from the Fourth Amendment's language regarding unreasonable searches and seizures.
The policy actually allows police to stop and “pat down" anyone they suspect may be committing, have committed, or are about to commit a crime. Their suspicion alone is what permits them to stop you and search you.
The current stop and frisk policy has been legal since 1968, when the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio to allow police officers the flexibility to temporarily detain and search someone they suspect has done or is in the process of doing something illegal.
Since then, all 50 states have adopted this ruling in some form.
Unfortunately, rather than rooting out crime, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New York reports that 9 out of 10 New Yorkers who have been stopped and frisked were innocent. Some people see stop and frisk as a form of harassment.
Explanation:
If a police officer suspects you are in some way involved in illegal activity, they have the authority to stop you, whether you're walking, driving, biking, boating, or engaged in some other activity.
“During a stop, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave," explains Tod Spodek, managing partner of the Spodek Law Group.
“When an officer stops your car, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that someone in the car committed a crime, or probable cause to believe the driver committed a traffic violation."
We hire more cops --- reported crime increases! What's going on? Seeing so many cops on patrol deters criminals from crime Newer cops are not experienced enough and cannot catch criminals in time Hiring more cops means that individual cops now don't feel so pressurized and don't work as hard as they used to. "The additional cops simply catch and record more of the # of crimes being committed. Nothing significant has been done to actually 'improve quality', that is identify and reduce the root economic/social causes of crime."
The statement "We hire more cops - reported crime increases!" can be explained by a combination of factors. On one hand, the presence of more cops on patrol can deter potential criminals from committing crimes, leading to a decrease in crime rates. However, it is also true that newer cops who lack experience may struggle to catch criminals in a timely manner, which could contribute to an increase in reported crime.
Additionally, hiring more cops may lead to individual officers feeling less pressure and consequently not working as hard as before. This can impact their effectiveness in preventing and solving crimes. It is important to note that while the hiring of more cops may result in an increase in the number of crimes being recorded, it does not necessarily address the underlying causes of crime.
To truly address crime, it is crucial to not only increase the number of cops but also focus on improving the quality of law enforcement efforts. This includes identifying and addressing the root economic and social factors that contribute to criminal behavior. By addressing these underlying causes, we can work towards reducing crime rates in a more significant and sustainable manner.
To know more about Potential visit:
brainly.com/question/14299140
#SPJ11
The new constitution in 1787 delegated a few powers to the federal government and reserved the rest for the states. this balanced form of government is called
In May 1787, delegates from every state—aside from Rhode Island—met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for a convention.
The Articles of Confederation were to be abandoned in favor of a new constitution, it was agreed at this gathering, which became known as the Constitutional Convention. The Constitutional Convention was presided over by George Washington.
What exactly is a constitutional convention?
In order to draft a constitution for the United States, a formal gathering known as the Constitutional Convention was held in 1787. The United States' fundamental law is found in a document known as the Constitution.
What caused the request for a Constitutional Convention?
Many of the delegates had considerably more ambitious ambitions than the ostensible purpose of the Convention, which was to amend the current Articles of Confederation. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, among others, preferred to build a new government than reform the current one.
To learn more about Constitutional Convention from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/14018105
#SPJ1
What type of intent is necessary to violate the provisions of the Deadly Weapons Control Law? Are there exceptions? Under what conditions is the possession of a dirk or dagger a crime under the provisions of PC 12020?
Answer:
Are you just trying to get free points?
Explanation:
what international laws warrant these regional and international
control mechanisms making these apparently restrictive measures
fairly legitimate for sake of protecting health and wellbeing
International laws are critical in safeguarding public health and the general well-being of individuals in different regions worldwide. Several international treaties are designed to promote and protect global public health. For instance, the World Health Organization (WHO) directs and coordinates international health within the United Nations' system.
Other essential international laws that protect public health include the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), which seeks to reduce the public health risks of tobacco use. The United Nations General Assembly also proclaimed HIV/AIDS as a threat to international security and development.
Consequently, the UNAIDS organization was formed to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections.
The International Health Regulations (IHR), adopted by the WHO in 2005, are critical in safeguarding public health against international health risks. These regulations help countries detect, assess, and respond to significant public health threats globally.
Moreover, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) works in collaboration with WHO to promote food safety standards, which is essential for global health. Therefore, these international laws warrant regional and international cooperation for the sake of protecting health and wellbeing.
To know more about United Nations, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13680618#
#SPJ11
Were prosecutors influenced in their decision by Mayweather's wealth and fame? Did Mayweather benefit from hiring expensive, prominent attorneys to defend him?
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
when is a motion for a directed verdict properly made? group of answer choices after the defendant has filed its answer after summary judgment has been granted after the plaintiff has presented its case only at the appellate court level
After the plaintiff has presented its case, a motion for directed verdict can be properly made.
Additional details about directed verdict are provided below:
Whenever a plaintiff has made a prima facie case, the case may withstand a defendant's motion for a directed verdict.A disagreement in federal cases is resolved by the requirement that specific grounds for the motion for a directed verdict be properly made and stated.The practice of asking the jury to sign off on a decision they did not reach through their own deliberations after the court has granted or the judgment has been granted a motion for a directed verdict serves no purpose and may offend the jury members.Learn more about how to define Directed Verdict: https://brainly.com/question/15105356
#SPJ4
Corporations may underreport cybercrimes because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence.
A. True
B. False
It is completely appropriate and correct to mention that the corporations may underreport cybercrime, because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
What is the significance of cybercrime?A cybercrime can be referred to or considered as a form of criminal activity that takes place over the internet using a computer or a network of computers. Such crimes are handled by a completely different department of police authorities.
There have been instances where the plaintiffs have underreported their cybercrime, as they are concerned about the breach of their private data and confidential information.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of a cybercrime.
Learn more about cybercrime here:
https://brainly.com/question/28836591
#SPJ12
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
Which of the following is illegal?
(A) = Saying "hi" to someone politely.
(B) = Cooking Mash potatoes and accidentally made it ugly.
(C) = Swinging a bat around in public for no reason.
(D) = Making fun of the clouds.
(E) = Carrying a Firearm with a License for it.
(F) = Killing someone for self-defense purposes.
(G) = Saying the Word "Voldemort" in public.
(There is only one answer that is illegal and could get your bat taken away and fine, and maybe incarceration (Arrest), and this is an example called disorderly conduct.)
Answer:
c?
Explanation:
i'm guessing it is c because that is the most reasonable and well one that seems like it might be because you can either hurt someone or attempt murder or something. the other answers are just random and are all legal now that i come to think of it, which is weird.
How is the Multiagency Coordination (MAC) Group interconnected with the other NIMS Command and Coordination structures?
Answer:
A. The MAC Group provides on-scene management of incidents and receives support from the EOC and JIS. ... The MAC Group integrates incident information and Public Affairs across ICS, EOCs, and JIS.
Explanation:
The Multiagency Coordination (MAC) Group is a crucial component of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) that is responsible for coordinating the activities and resources of multiple agencies involved in a complex incident.
What is Multiagency Coordination (MAC) Group ?A Multiagency Coordination (MAC) Group is a group of representatives from various agencies, organizations, and jurisdictions that come together to coordinate and support incident management efforts.
The MAC Group is designed to promote coordination and communication among these organizations and to facilitate the sharing of information and resources.
The MAC Group is interconnected with other NIMS Command and Coordination structures through a hierarchical system of management and coordination.
Learn more about Multiagency Coordination (MAC) Group here:
https://brainly.com/question/28812655
#SPJ6
please help answer this asap!
Is this a criminal or civil case? explain why.
article:
With Mounties due for a pay bump, cash-strapped municipalities seek reprieve from Ottawa:
Mounties are due to receive a chunk of retroactive pay after negotiating their first-ever collective agreement. Some municipalities say the looming salary bump will stress their finances — and they want Ottawa to step up.
This summer, the federal government and the union representing RCMP members ratified an agreement to deliver a sizeable pay increase to nearly 20,000 members.
Constables — who account for more than half of all RCMP officers — will see their maximum salary jump from $86,110 as of April 2016 to $106,576 next year.
The deal also lays out retroactive pay increases going back to 2017. The RCMP last updated its wage scale in 2016 and for years Mounties' pay lagged behind that of other police services.
According to the agreement, the rates of pay will change within 90 days of Aug. 6, when the collective agreement was signed. It's then up to the RCMP to make its "best effort" to implement the retroactive payable amounts within 270 days of signing.
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) says communities that pay the RCMP for policing services are growing alarmed over the agreement's cost.
"It's widespread coast to coast to coast and our municipalities are actually very concerned, very, very concerned," said FCM president Joanne Vanderheyden, also the mayor of the municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc in Ontario.
"This issue is absolutely urgent given the potential impacts on municipal finances."
Municipalities with populations of less than 15,000 pay 70 per cent of the costs, while the federal government pays 30 per cent. Municipalities with more than 15,000 residents pay 90 per cent.
Vanderheyden said that while negotiations on the collective agreement were happening behind closed doors, municipalities were advised by the federal government to set money aside to cover the anticipated pay hike.
"Well, the percentage was way too low," she said, adding the retroactive pay also came as a surprise to most mayors.
"We are absolutely not against collective bargaining. That's not it. It's when you're not at the table and the direct impact comes to you."
Ottawa is asked to swallow retroactive costs
The FCM has written a letter to the federal government asking it to absorb all retroactive costs associated with the collective agreement.
Without federal help, Vanderheyden said, "municipalities will be forced to make incredibly difficult decisions because they're either going have to make cuts to their essential services or pass it along to the property tax, local residents. Because they can't go into arrears, they can't go to deficits."
Peter Brown, mayor of Airdrie in Alberta, said that while he firmly supports paying RCMP officers more, he was surprised by the final price tag. He said his city, just north of Calgary, has budgeted and held money back over the past few years but still has only about half of what it needs to cover the added policing costs.
"The message from me is, recognize that we've all been hit. We're all suffering," he said, referring to the pandemic.
Brown said the collective agreement's impact on Airdrie's budget is "probably in a $3.5 million to $4 million range. That's the equivalent [of] a five per cent tax increase."
Codiac RCMP spending rises to $39M in proposed 2022 budget
Malcolm Brodie, mayor of Richmond, B.C., said his municipality estimates the retroactive pay lump sum will cost it something between $9 million and $11 million, plus the annual pay increase itself.
"What that means for us is to cover that the amount going forward on our budget, that's about a one-time 2.5 to 3.5 per cent tax increase," he said.
"We certainly have stayed with the RCMP for a good reason. We think that they've done a good job for our community. Having said that, you know, it's getting a whole lot more expensive."
A spokesperson for the federal Department of Public Safety said the department has kept in touch with regions with RCMP contracts on a regular basis since 2018.
"Contracting jurisdictions were aware that the salary of RCMP officers had been frozen since 2016 and that the collective bargaining process began in 2020. With the new collective agreement for RCMP regular members and reservists, salaries are in line with other police services across Canada," said Tim Warmington.
"It is fair for regular members and reservists as well as reasonable for Canadian taxpayers."
answer please!!
Answer:
WE NOT FINNA READ ALL THIS YOU CRAZY