FILL IN THE BLANK _____ takes place when one who has a duty to act reasonably acts carelessly and causes injury to another.

Answer:

I do not understand your question.

Please be more clear on what you want to be answered.

Please and Thank you!

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

theorists from the positivist school

The impact that increasing number of social grants may have on teen mothers is:

This refers to the government cash incentive to take care of a particular social problem.

With this in mind, we can see that because of the increase in social grants, this can have an adverse impact on teenage mothers as they might have an incentive to give birth to more children and depend on the government.

Read more about social grants here:
https://brainly.com/question/4869427

When a plaintiff brings a lawsuit claiming harm, the court will examine the statute or regulation in question to determine if it was intended to protect against the type of harm the plaintiff has suffered.

The court will analyze the language of the statute or regulation and its legislative history to determine the purpose of the law.

Additionally, the court will look at the specific facts of the case and the harm suffered by the plaintiff to determine if it falls within the scope of protection of the law.

If the court determines that the statute or regulation was designed to protect against the type of harm suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff may have a viable claim.

However, if the court determines that the law was not intended to protect against that specific harm, the plaintiff's claim may be dismissed.

Ultimately, the court's decision will depend on a thorough analysis of the law and the specific facts of the case.

To know more about lawsuit refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28521301#

#SPJ11

The Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000 is a set of guidelines and procedures for Virginia state agencies and the administrative processes they follow.

The Act outlines the methods for developing, adopting, and implementing regulations, as well as hearing and decision-making procedures.

The Virginia Administrative Process Act is a set of state laws that govern the operations of Virginia's administrative agencies.

The Act establishes the procedures that state agencies must follow in adopting, developing, and implementing rules and regulations. The Act was enacted in 1981 and is designed to ensure that state agencies operate in a fair and open manner.

It outlines the procedures for public participation in the development of regulations, including opportunities for public comment, public hearings, and judicial review.

It also outlines the methods for enforcing agency decisions and appeals to those decisions.

In summary, the Virginia Administrative Process Act provides a structured process for state agencies to follow in conducting their affairs, ensuring that they operate in an open and fair manner that is consistent with the principles of democratic government.

To know more about Virginia Administrative Process refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20338178#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

The law that applies to this situation varies depending on the country or state you are in.

In the United States, most states have a zero-tolerance policy for drivers under the age of 21 who are found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. This is typically referred to as a "zero tolerance law." Under this law, drivers under 21 years old with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .02 or above can face penalties such as license suspension or revocation, fines, and mandatory alcohol education programs.

It's important to note that the specific penalties for violating this law can vary by state, and the legal drinking age is also different in some countries. It's always best to check your local laws to ensure you understand the specific regulations and penalties that apply to your situation.

According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, drivers who are under 21 years old with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of .02 or above may lose their license.

The Zero Tolerance Law was designed to protect underage drivers from the dangers of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. When a driver under the age of 21 is found to have a BAC of .02 or higher, their license will be automatically suspended for a certain amount of time. This law was put in place to discourage underage drivers from drinking and driving, as the consequences for doing so are much more serious than for adults.

Here you can learn more about zero tolerance law https://brainly.com/question/30706389

#SPJ11

Answer:

Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.

Explanation:

Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.

When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.

Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.

Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.

Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.

Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.

Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.

Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.

Learn more about Gideon here:

https://brainly.com/question/20791026

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

The Council of Economic Advisers, an agency within the Executive Office of the President, is charged with providing the President objective economic advice on the formulation of both domestic and international economic policy.

Answer: the Council of Economic Advisers

Explanation: trust me

Answer:

what/?

Explanation:

Answer:

Making treaties with other countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

Explanation:

In the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution. The correct option is (D).

The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also specifies the fundamental legislation of the United States federal government.

It is the oldest written national constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.

The states ratified a charter of governance, and it is still regarded as the ultimate law of the land. Both writings have had a significant impact on American history and the global development of democracy.

Therefore, in the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

To know more about the Constitution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ5

Answer:

The decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka on May 17, 1954 is perhaps the most famous of all Supreme Court cases, as it started the process ending segregation. It overturned the equally far-reaching decision of Plessy v. Ferguson .

So, in other words, segregation would not have been ended.

Explanation:

If the court had refused to overturn the decision of the court in Plessy vs. Ferguson, during its judgement in the Brown Vs Board case, then it is safe to estimate that slavery would have continued or taken longer to end.

The Supreme Court, in the above-named case, ruled that racial segregation of students in public schools was unconstitutional.

It went ahead to overturn the "separate but equal" principle established in the 1896 case between Plessy v. Ferguson decision.

This ruling marked the end of officially sanctioned racial segregation in American schools.

Learn more about the Brown Vs Board of Education Case at:
https://brainly.com/question/8473769
#SPJ6

Answer:

no

Explanation:

just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently

When we speak a different language or have a different culture, we seem 'alien' or foreign to those who do not follow the same as us. This makes us view each other differently as we do not have the knowledge to understand what the other person is doing, saying, or even implying.

It is true that language is an important factor in one's identity and belonging. It also determines who we are as a person, and reveals or is indicative of our origin.

When we don't understand a person with a different language, or culture, or language identity, we tend to view them differently because of the feeling of being different, strange in some sort, or even completely unique to us. This 'difference' makes them as 'the other', another type, and being seen as separate or unrelated.

Learn more about language here:

brainly.com/question/19898392

Answer:

it is how you characterize your self

The  law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.

The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:

https://brainly.com/question/5481344

#SPJ1

Answer:

DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.

Explanation:

Answer:

It matters where you live. Every state does it differently.

Explanation:

Answer:

A trade agreement

Explanation:

Answer:

B. A trade agreement

Explanation:

Answer:

Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think

Explanation:

The entire industry in the social system became highly unregulated as a result of the first real use of jury selection by Jay Schulman using scientific methods.

Jury selection can be referred to or considered as the process of electing members for the jury that is responsible for arriving at important decisions in the matters they are interested in.

When this method was brought into implementation by Jay Schulman, the entire industry in the American political and social systems became prone to least following of regulations.

Therefore, the significance regarding jury selection has been aforementioned.

Learn more about jury selection here:

https://brainly.com/question/14300638

#SPJ1

Answer:

A Earth?

Explanation:

'Cause you make my earth quake

Oh, you make my earth quake

Riding around, you tell me something, baby, and it's making my heart break

'Cause you make my earth quake

Oh, you make my earth quake (earth quake, yeah)

Riding around, your love is shakin' me up and it's making my heart break (you already know)

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.

An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.

Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.

Answer:

To summarize, the periodic table is important because it is organized to provide a great deal of information about elements and how they relate to one another in one easy-to-use reference. The table can be used to predict the properties of elements, even those that have not yet been discovered

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

Answer:

c

Explanation:

I think this is right its been so long since I did this test

Cultural learning may be accomplished in three ways:

Cultural learning is the process through which a group of people or animals within a civilization or culture learn and transmit knowledge. Learning styles are heavily impacted by how society interacts with its children and youth. In the last fifty years, a cross-cultural study has mostly concentrated on contrasts between Eastern and Western civilizations. Individuals can gain talents that they would not be able to master on their own during the course of their lives through cultural learning. Cultural learning is thought to be especially essential for humans. When compared to the appearance of adult teeth, humans are weaned at a young age.

To learn more about Cultural learning, click

https://brainly.com/question/29024017

#SPJ1

Answer:

This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.

Explanation:

The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.

But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.