In the US, FICA is a federal payroll tax. It is known as the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and is deducted from every paycheck.. Your nine-digit number enables Social Security to precisely record your self-employment or insured wages. You accumulate credits for Social Security benefits as you work and pay FICA taxes.
To all taxable compensation is applied the FICA tax rate. Salary, wages, tips, bonuses, commissions, and taxable fringe benefits are all included in this. A table listing different fringe benefits that are exempt from FICA and those that are subject to it may be found in IRS Publication 15-B. The FICA tax system. FICA taxes, which make up 15.3% of your wages, are a combination of Social Security and Medicare taxes. 7.65% of the overall cost is your responsibility; this comprises a 6.2% Social Security tax and a 1.45% Medicare levy on your salary. Federal income taxes do not include FICA. Although the employee's gross wages serve as the foundation for both taxes, they are two distinct elements that are computed separately.
Learn more about FICA taxes from
brainly.com/question/2288869
#SPJ4
An intentional or unintentional concealment entitles the affected party to which of the following?
A Rescission of a contract.
B Estoppel.
C Waiver of concealed conditions.
D Subrogation of a contract.
An intentional or unintentional concealment entitles the affected party to "B. Estoppel.
Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents a person from asserting something contrary to what is implied by a previous action or statement of that person, or by a previous related action or statement of another person. Estoppel is frequently used in litigation and can be utilized as a defense or an affirmative claim.
When there is concealment, it's the result of an action or statement of one party, and the affected party relies on that statement or action, believing that it is true. Then, the affected party cannot assert something that contradicts what was said or done earlier. That would be unconscionable. Therefore, estoppel is the best answer. It's worth noting that estoppel is used as a defense in cases like contract law, and its applicability.Correct option is (b).
To know more about Estoppel, visit:-
brainly.com/question/31870117
#SPJ11
Under the deterrence theory, who is deterred as a result of sentencing? de ut a. victims of crime b. the criminal being sentenced others who may be tempted to commit similar crimes both b and c
Answer:
Under the economic theory of deterrence, an increase in the cost of crime should deter people from committing the crime, and there is evidence that individuals who believe they are likely to be arrested and punished are less likely to commit a crime than those who do not expect to be captured or punished.
Explanation:
What is one problem with government regulation of monopolies?
Answer: In entertainment yes we have monopolies over our creative content we produce
Explanation: The legal monopoly status of government agencies leaves the public stuck with nowhere to turn. The legal monopoly status of government regulatory agencies is a problem. It means that when and if these agencies do a bad job of assuring quality in their industries, the public is stuck and they have nowhere to turn, so there are no systemic forces ...
As you approach an intersection blanks around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection
Answer:
As you approach an intersection scan around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection.
Explanation:
When approaching an intersection you need to get a good visual overview of what is going on from all directions.
If you are approaching an intersection with traffic lights you should be scanning well ahead, therefore you should be prepared to stop if you see that the lights are green from a distance because they will most likely be red by the time you get to the intersection.
At any rate, be prepared to yield to the traffic ahead of you or that are already in the intersection.
Which verb is a near-synonym for "to discriminate"?
a. to profile
b. to criminalize
c. to extinguish
d. to distinguish
Answer:
b. to criminalize
Explanation:
who is the speaker of the house (in general) and why is he important
In general, the Speaker of the House is the presiding officer of the lower chamber of a bicameral legislative body. They are important because they ensure that the House's rules and procedures are followed.
What does the Speaker do ?The role of the Speaker in the House is paramount as they hold the highest rank and assume responsibility for supervising and monitoring legislative procedures. Additionally, the Speaker has a duty to maintain order and decency within the chamber, ensuring adherence to protocols and guidelines set by the House.
To this end, the Speaker holds vital powers such as recognizing individuals who wish to speak, interpreting rules and precedents, and deciding on points of order. Their authority is integral to maintaining the proper course and civility during proceedings.
Find out more on Speakers at https://brainly.com/question/25312785
#SPJ1
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Explanation:
There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls
tell me where u live(not a stalker just want to know if i live by u)
Answer:
with jewish mokeys
Explanation:
Answer:
on top of the moon\
so byeee
Explanation:
In a successful civil RICO action, what civil remedies are available to the prevailing party?
allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
wikipedia
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
A. Rose is lost and pulls her car into Micha's driveway for a moment to get her bearings. B. Oscar is a twelve-year-old neighbor of Micha's who has snuck into Micha's backyard to swim in his pool. C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates. D. Ron is Micha's friend whom Micha has invited to his home to watch the Super Bowl.
Answer:
C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates.
Explanation:
Micha is responsible for all the people in her cafeteria, as well as being responsible for the food security of her customers. For this reason, we can say that when Juanita enters Micha's cafeteria, she consumes her products, she becomes Micha's responsibility. The other scenarios shown in the question, do not have the direct responsibility of Micha, or do not require any responsibility from her, but from third parties.
Although rare, researchers have found neighborhoods where levels of
collective efficacy are high and so is crime.
True
O False
Criminal justice
the answer is true.......
Under which type of law would a dispute concerning copyrights be addressed?
a common law
b contract law
c civil law
d statutory law
A dispute concerning copyrights would be addressed under option D) statutory law.
Statutory law is a type of law that is established by written laws passed by a legislative body. These laws are enacted by Congress or the legislature, and they are codified in a jurisdiction's legal code. Statutory law takes priority over common law, which is law that is created by judges based on legal precedent and customary law.In the United States, copyright disputes would be addressed under statutory law.
Specifically, the Copyright Act of 1976 governs copyright law and provides a framework for addressing copyright disputes. This law defines what types of creative works can be copyrighted, how long copyrights last, and what rights copyright holders have. It also outlines the legal remedies available to copyright holders who have had their rights infringed upon.
To know more about statutory visit :
brainly.com/question/8868792
#SPJ11
Angelina and Brad have six kids. They have been secretly separated for a number of years, and they have finally decided to get a divorce. During their separation, the kids
lived primarily with Angelina. However, Brad insists he should get primary custody of the children. If he can't get custody of all of the kids, he is willing to settle for
custody of his three favorite kids and let Angelina have the other three.
What are some of the issues here?
- 12
Pararanh
lawyer's client, Consuela, reveals that she is cheating on her spouse, which is why she was taking an unusual route to work. While taking this different route, her tire got punctured and she had to step out of the car to check it out. While Consuela was taking a look at the tire, a random man (whom she did not know) ran past Consuela and slipped a murder weapon in her bag. Just as she was getting the murder weapon out of her bag, the cops arrived and arrested Consuela as an accessory to murder. Prosecutors contend that Consuela knows who the "random man" is, and they allege that she has assisted that man to escape capture. Despite the serious charges against Consuela, she tells her lawyer that she does not want to disclose the real reason why she was taking a different route to work (that she had gone that route in order to be with her paramour - the person with whom she was having an affair). Is the lawyer permitted to reveal what Consuela told her - the reason she was taking that route? Yes, because it serves as evidence and will prevent the client from getting framed. Yes, because the client told the lawyer, which automatically means the lawyer can reveal that information in courts. Yes, because of the mandatory disclosure rule. O No; in this case, the lawyer may only reveal a client's spoken intent to soon commit a crime (i.e., to carry out an impending crime). O No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty
The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".
The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.
Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486
#SPJ11
What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?
Answer:
The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.
Hope I helped
What is the Act that is governing private companies
Answer:
The call it the companies act
Explanation:
The Exchange Act created the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that has oversight, as well as regulatory authority and disciplinary power, over the U.S. Securities industry, including brokerage firms and their reps, transfer agents, and the nation's Securities Self-Regulatory Organizations (“SROs”).
Mr. Asif, a Salaried Individual, has following information for the Tax Year 2020.
• His Annual Tax Certificate from Employer shows, Annual Gross Salaried Income of Rs. 950,000
• His employer has deducted WHT under Section 149 (Salary of Employee) Rs. 17200. • His Mobile Tax Certificate shows WHT under Section 236 (Prepaid Telephone Card) Rs. 889.
• He received share of Profit from Investment in a Business Rs. 150,000.
• The details of his Personal Assets as follow:
Balances June 30, 2019 June 30, 2020
Cash at Hand 50,000 50,000
Bank Account (Salaried) 121,000 159,000
Bank Account (Saving) 150,000 265,000
Prize Bond 255,000 255,000
Investment in Business 2,000,000 2,000,000
Property (Residential) 3,200,000 3,200,000
Calculate:
• Total Income
• Tax Chargeable (Annual Income Tax)
• Admitted Income Tax (Remaining Tax Liability)
• His estimated Personal Expenses (Reconciliation of Personal Assets)
1. Total Income is Rs. 1,100,000.
2. Tax chargeable is, Rs. 21,787.65.
3. Mr. Asif's remaining tax liability, Admitted Income Tax, is Rs. 3,698.65.
4. Mr. Asif's estimated personal expenses for the tax year 2020 are Rs. 797,000.
Total Income:
Annual Gross Salaried Income = Rs. 950,000
Share of Profit from Investment = Rs. 150,000
Total Income = Rs. 950,000 + Rs. 150,000 = Rs. 1,100,000
Tax Chargeable (Annual Income Tax):
Taxable Income = Total Income - WHT under Section 149 - WHT under Section 236 = Rs. 1,100,000 - Rs. 17,200 - Rs. 889 = Rs. 1,081,911
Taxable income falls under the tax slab of Rs. 1,000,001 to Rs. 2,500,000, so the tax rate would be 15%.
Income Tax = Taxable Income x Tax Rate - Fixed Tax Amount
Income Tax = (Rs. 1,081,911 x 0.15) - Rs. 72,250
Income Tax = Rs. 21,787.65
Admitted Income Tax (Remaining Tax Liability):
Admitted Income Tax is the tax liability that remains after deducting the taxes already paid, including WHT and Advance Tax.
Total Taxes Paid = WHT under Section 149 + WHT under Section 236 = Rs. 17,200 + Rs. 889 = Rs. 18,089
Admitted Income Tax = Income Tax - Total Taxes Paid = Rs. 21,787.65 - Rs. 18,089 = Rs. 3,698.65
To estimate Mr. Asif's personal expenses, we need to reconcile his personal assets from June 30, 2019, to June 30, 2020. The increase in personal assets during this period represents his savings, and the decrease represents his expenses.
Cash at Hand: No change, so no expenses
Bank Account (Salaried): Increased by Rs. 38,000 (159,000 - 121,000), representing savings
Bank Account (Saving): Increased by Rs. 115,000 (265,000 - 150,000), representing saving.
Total Savings: Rs. 153,000 (38,000 + 115,000)
To estimate Mr. Asif's personal expenses,
Personal Expenses = Gross Salary - Total Savings
Gross Salary = Rs. 950,000
Total Savings = Rs. 153,000
Personal Expenses = 950,000 - 153,000 = Rs. 797,000
To know more about annual income, here
brainly.com/question/30444076
#SPJ4
state courts account for about what percent of all court cases in the u.s.?
State courts account for approximately 97% of all court cases in the U.S. These courts handle a vast majority of cases because they possess general jurisdiction, which means they can hear almost any type of case that arises within their state.
This includes both civil and criminal matters, family law issues, property disputes, and probate matters. State courts have the authority to interpret and apply state laws and constitutions. As a result, they handle cases involving state law, as well as local ordinances and regulations. Additionally, state courts address many federal law issues that have a direct impact on the lives of the residents within their jurisdiction.
In contrast, federal courts handle only a small percentage of cases, as they have limited jurisdiction. Federal courts primarily hear cases involving federal laws or constitutional issues, disputes between states or citizens of different states, and cases involving the United States government. Thus, state courts play a significant role in the American judicial system by addressing the vast majority of cases that impact people's lives directly.
To summarize, state courts account for about 97% of all court cases in the United States, and they are critical to the administration of justice as they handle a broad range of legal issues that directly affect the lives of citizens within their jurisdiction.
To learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896#
#SPJ11
what type of damages are designed to place a plaintiff in the same position as if there had been no breach of the contract? question 18 options: punitive damages specific damages compensatory damages monetary damages exact damages
Option compensatory damages is the correct option.
Compensatory settlements. damages that are intended to put a plaintiff in the same situation as if there had been no contract violation
Actual damages, commonly referred to as compensatory damages in tort law, are financial awards made by a judge that are equal to the loss a party experienced. A court may alternatively award minimal damages if a party's right was formally infringed but they did not experience any hurt or losses.
Actual monetary losses are covered by compensatory damages. For instance, a victim of negligence may file a lawsuit against the offender to recover lost earnings and medical expenses.
Money that is granted to an affected person as compensation for losses, injuries, or other losses is known as compensatory damages. In civil court situations when loss has happened as a result of another party's carelessness or illegal behaviour, compensatory damages are granted.
For such more question on compensatory damages
https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ4
Arthur Fairchild is accused of breaking into a top secret military installation and tampering with the records. Fairchild claims that at the time of the break-in he was with some friends smoking marijuana. Because that is against the law, his friends do not want to testify on his behalf. Will they have to?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway
50 POINTS CAREER
Part I
For this part of the activity, you will be looking at two different author’s perspectives on workplace skills and creating a written response that analyzes, compares, and contrasts these viewpoints.
Browse through the text choices and select two to use for this activity.
Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success
The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace
Communication Skills for Workplace Success
Specifically, in your response you should:
Compare and contrast the two authors’ differing opinions regarding the steps needed to obtain your desired job and/or the most important workplace skills for success.
Identify where the two articles/texts provide conflicting views or information and analyze whether you believe the conflicting information is based on fact or interpretation.
Cite any inferences that you draw from either/both texts on workplace skills necessary for success.
Be sure to cite any textual evidence that supports your claims, inferences, or thoughts on these two texts.
For this activity, I have chosen the following two texts:
Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success
The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace
In the text "Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success," the author emphasizes the importance of developing a wide range of business skills to succeed in the workplace. According to the author, the most important business skills include communication, teamwork, problem-solving, time management, and adaptability. The author suggests that individuals need to continuously learn and develop these skills in order to succeed in their desired jobs.
On the other hand, "The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace" article focuses on the top skills that are in demand in the modern workplace. The author identifies skills such as digital literacy, critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and cross-cultural competency as being essential in today's job market. The author argues that these skills are crucial for individuals to remain competitive in the fast-changing job market.
While both articles emphasize the importance of certain skills in the workplace, they differ in the skills that they prioritize. "Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success" emphasizes the importance of soft skills such as communication and problem-solving, while "The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace" highlights the importance of technical skills such as digital literacy and critical thinking.
The conflicting views in these articles may be due to differences in interpretation and perspective. For example, the first article may be more geared towards individuals seeking to develop their overall business acumen, while the second article may be more focused on the skills required for success in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
From these texts, it can be inferred that both soft skills and technical skills are crucial for success in the workplace. Employers are looking for individuals who possess a combination of technical and soft skills, and it is essential for individuals to continuously develop and improve their skills in order to remain competitive in the job market.
In conclusion, both articles provide valuable insights into the skills necessary for success in the workplace. While they differ in their prioritization of certain skills, they both highlight the importance of continuous learning and skill development. By combining both technical and soft skills, individuals can position themselves for success in the modern job market.
Ivan met with his friend Anthony, who was driving a flashy new red convertible. Ivan knew that neither Anthony nor his family owned this car, but it looked good, so he got in and let Anthony take him for a ride. Ivan also knew that Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. Anthony offered to sell Ivan an MP3 player he had in the back seat of the car for $40. Ivan agreed to pay him the money.
a. Have any crimes been committed? If so, which crimes and by whom?
b. Why does society make receiving stolen property a crime? Should it be?
c. Would you ever buy something for an extremely low price from a friend? How would you know for sure it was not stolen?
Yes, a crime was committed as Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. This was a crime of theft.
The crime of receiving a stolen property is defined as knowingly receiving the stolen property with the sole intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property stolen. So, receiving of stolen property is a crime.
So, this tends to prevent concealing of a property by a particular person who thus know that such property is thus obtained by an illegal way. Suppose if an item is sold by at a very low price so the item can be stolen. Thus, this is an act of crime which is called theft.
Hence, handling stolen goods is a crime.
To learn more about theft here:
https://brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ1
How are Texas judges selected?
O President Appoints, Senate Confirms
O Elected by the people
Appointed by the Governor
Voted on by the State Legislature
When turning, you must get into the proper turn lane at least before you turn.
O a) Half a block
Ob) One block
Oc) Two blocks
O d) Three blocks
before you turn.
Whilst turning, you have to get into the proper turn lane as a minimum earlier than you switch. c) Two blocks
Turn lanes are traffic lanes that permit you to make a proper or left flip at an intersection or to a side street. flip lanes are managed by street symptoms and pavement markings that show you the direction of the tour from the lane. Regulatory street signs and symptoms that control separate lanes are regarded as lane-use management signs.
Start the flip within the left lane closest to the middle of the road. entire the flip, if secure, in both lanes of the crossroad (proven by using the arrows). Use the center left turn lane if one is to be had. A left flip can be crafted from the other lane if accredited with the aid of signs and symptoms or arrows.
The median strip or imperative reservation is the reserved location that separates opposing lanes of visitors on divided roadways including divided highways, dual carriageways, freeways, and motorways.
Learn more about lane here: https://brainly.com/question/24637611
#SPJ1
in a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information obtained during discovery.
In a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information in the pleadings. This statement is TRUE.
A request for judgment on the pleadings is appropriately made in a federal civil action once all pleadings, including the complaint, answer, any counterclaims, cross-claims, and answers, have been filed. This kind of motion is made simply on the claims made by the parties in the pleadings, without taking any evidence into account.
A move for judgment on the pleadings asks the court to determine that there are no genuine factual disputes and to conclude the case by applying the law to these undisputed facts. When one party files a request for judgment on the pleadings, they argue that even if all of the facts asserted by the other party are true, the case should still be determined in their favor.
To know more about pleadings refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
what would be a negative effect economic effect of a government’s decision to build a new highway?
Answer:
the transport of goods. because it was a new highway people was on there and the goods that they were transferring would be delayed on both trading sides
Hi how do I create a answer on this thing i want achievments
Answer: You just click the answer button
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
(c) What are the similarities between the functions of the temple of Jerusalem and the church today?
The functions of the temple of Jerusalem and the church today share several similarities. Both serve as places of worship, where individuals can come together to pray and seek guidance from a higher power. They are also places where people can receive spiritual education and guidance through teachings and sermons.
In addition, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as places of community and social interaction. They provide opportunities for individuals to connect with others who share their beliefs and values. They are also centers for outreach and charitable work, serving the needs of the local community and beyond.
Moreover, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today emphasize the importance of rituals and traditions. They celebrate important religious holidays and events, providing a sense of continuity and connection with the past. Finally, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as symbols of faith and hope, reminding believers of the power of the divine and the promise of salvation.
For more such questions on church
https://brainly.com/question/28389583
#SPJ11