All of the following are suggested as a beginning point by experts in international communication, with the exception of making snap decisions and emphasizing the evaluation and interpretation of events.
What are the three things that are essential to improving cross-cultural communication skills?The core elements of intercultural competence. Language that people use to describe their surroundings and selves is known as orientation to knowledge. The capacity to act as though you see the world from the perspective of others is empathy. The ability to handle dialogue is referred to as interaction management.
What is the key to cross-cultural communication that works?Establishing a balance between showing similarities and noting differences is the key to successful cross-cultural communication. Contrary to popular belief, focusing excessively on our similarities to others or our differences from others can lead to just as many issues as the opposite.
Learn more about cross-cultural communication: https://brainly.com/question/14271958
#SPJ4
What are five situations in which it is legally permissible for co's to use Force
Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.
1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.
2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.
3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.
4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.
5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.
It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.
Know more about Enforcing laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ11
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
The force created when the court pushes LeBron James upwards is equal to
which force?y
Answer:
The force Lebron James drives into the court when he jumps
i hope this helps
The Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for espionage. t/f
Short Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Operation CHAOS or Operation MHCHAOS was a Central Intelligence Agency domestic espionage project targeting the American people from 1967 to 1974, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson and expanded under President Richard Nixon, whose mission was to uncover possible foreign influence on domestic race, anti-war and other protest movements.
if a depreciable asset is sold at a gain and the tax basis of the asset is greater than the book basis, the tax gain on sale will be than the book gain on sale.
If a depreciable asset is sold at a gain and the tax basis of the asset is greater than the book basis, the tax gain on sale will be higher than the book gain on sale.
This is because the tax basis is used to calculate the taxable gain, while the book basis is used to calculate the gain or loss on the sale in the company's financial statements.
When the tax basis is higher than the book basis, it means that the company has claimed more depreciation on the asset for tax purposes than it has recorded in its financial statements. This results in a higher tax gain on the sale compared to the book gain on sale.
To know more about tax gain,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/21438354#
#SPJ11
an exaggerated devotion to the interests of a region over those of a country as a whole. is called?
An exaggerated devotion to the interests of a region over those of a country as a whole. is called sectionalism.
Devotion refers to a strong feeling of dedication or commitment towards a particular cause, person, belief, or activity. It involves a deep sense of loyalty and faithfulness that drives one to consistently act in accordance with their beliefs or goals, often putting the interests of the object of their devotion above their own.
Devotion can take many forms, ranging from religious practices such as prayer, meditation, and worship, to personal relationships such as marriage, friendship, or parenthood. In essence, devotion is a powerful emotional connection that motivates individuals to pursue their goals with unwavering dedication and commitment. It often involves sacrifice, self-discipline, and a willingness to prioritize the needs of the object of one's devotion above one's own.
To learn more about Devotion visit here:
brainly.com/question/930352
#SPJ4
Anita runs a business supplying furniture for special events. She has a contract to provide 100 chairs for Bob's 60thbirthday garden party, for $500. On the morning of the party, Bob and his helpers are setting up for the day's celebrations. Anita arrives, but she has only brought 93 chairs. She first speaks to Bob's nephew, Jasper. When he hears that only 93 chairs have arrived, Jasper quickly gets into his car to go find another furniture hire business. He finds one that will provide 7 similar chairs, for a cost of $63. When Anita sees Bob inside, and tells him she has only brought 93 chairs, Bob is angry. Anita claims that Bob must pay her the full $500, but Bob disagrees. Is Anita entitled to any payment (and if so, how much)?
Answer:
She is entitled to a pro-rated payment of $465.00
Explanation:
You would take the $500 and divide it by the 100 chairs. That is $5 a chair. Then multiply $5 x 93. That is $465.
An officer grabs a reluctant suspect by the arm and escorts the suspect to the police
vehicle. In the use of force continuum, this is an example of
non-verbal
command
hard hand
soft hand
Answer:
hard hand
Explanation:
نعلم ان الحملة الفرنسية علي العالم العربي كانت عدوانية إذا كيف اسهمت في اليقظة الفكريي والأدبية؟
which of the following accurately describe ways in which interest groups can use litigation to advance their cause?
They can file amicus briefs activity businesses can use litigation to boost their cause.
Amicus briefs are filed by using humans who normally take the position of one facet in a case, in the procedure helping a cause that has some bearing on the issues in the case.
The agencies most likely to file amicus briefs are businesses, academics, government entities, non-profits and alternate associations.
Why are amicus briefs filed?Amicus curiae briefs (also acknowledged as pal of the court docket briefs) can play an important, and sometimes critical, function in appellate advocacy by using bringing applicable facts and arguments to the court's attention that the parties have no longer already addressed (see, for example, Sup. Ct. R. 37.1).
Learn more about amicus briefs here:
https://brainly.com/question/1802096#SPJ4Which of the following may private club not do
Ken Dawson wants to be sure that he has Liability coverage if, in his consulting business, his advice causes a client financial harm. What step(s) could Ken take to provide this protection? .... I. Confirm that his firm has either a Commercial General Liability policy or a BOP. .... II. Confirm that his firm has a Professional Liability policy. .... III. Purchase a Professional Liability policy in his own name. .... IV. Add a Business Pursuits endorsement to his homeowner's policy. Select one: a. I and II only b. II or III only c. III only d. I, II or III e. II, III or IV
II. Confirm that his firm has a Professional Liability policy.
Professional Liability insurance, also known as Errors and Omissions (E&O) insurance, is specifically designed to protect professionals, such as consultants, from liability claims arising out of their professional services. It provides coverage for financial harm caused to a client as a result of errors, negligence, or omissions in the advice or services provided.
Having a Professional Liability policy in place is a crucial step for Ken to ensure protection if his advice causes a client financial harm. This policy would cover legal defense costs, settlements, and judgments associated with claims made against him. It helps safeguard his personal and business assets in the event of a lawsuit or claim.
Professional Liability insurance is different from Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance or a Business Owners Policy (BOP). While CGL or BOP policies provide coverage for bodily injury, property damage, and advertising claims, they generally exclude coverage for professional errors or negligence. Therefore, relying solely on a CGL or BOP policy may not be sufficient to protect Ken from claims related to his professional services.
By confirming that his firm has a Professional Liability policy, Ken ensures that he has a specialized coverage tailored to his consulting business and the potential risks associated with providing professional advice. This policy serves as an essential safety net, offering financial protection and peace of mind in the face of unforeseen circumstances.
Learn more about Liability policy
https://brainly.com/question/28341369
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a sergeant in a mid-sized police agency. You have been assigned to the IA unit as a supervisor. The Chief has given you the task of conducting an audit of racial profiling complaints by your fellow officers and reporting back to her with the results. What areas of the department would you look at first and why? How will you conduct this audit of complaints? What would you do to establish the validity of the complaints? What will your recommendations if you find there is indeed racial profiling? What if the audit shows there is no racial profiling going on? What will be some of the pitfalls you might come upon, and how will you address them?
As a supervisor, you should pay attention to the complaint and write down its specifics.
What is a supervisor?The supervisor's overall responsibilities include communicating organizational needs, monitoring employee performance, offering direction and support.
Also, identifying areas for development, and managing the mutually beneficial relationship between staff and the organisation to ensure that both parties succeed.
You should pay close attention to the complaint, take note of its specifics, take action right away, and follow up.
The term "racial profiling" describes the unfair practise of law enforcement authorities who single out someone for questioning on the basis of their race, ethnicity, religion, or country of origin.
The goal of racial reconciliation is for law enforcement and the community to realise three things: they fundamentally misunderstand each other, they both contribute to damages neither wants, and they share similar core desires in key areas.
Thus, this way, one can conduct this audit of complaints.
For more details regarding a supervisor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14936907
#SPJ1
What is the three-word phrase used to indicate that a body of congress shall approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges?.
The three-word expression used to describe whether a congressional body will approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges are senate, advice and consent.
What does advice and the consent of senate means?In the United States, the term "advice and consent" refers to the Senate's authority to consult with and approve the president's nominations to public positions, such as those of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, officers of the armed forces, US attorneys, ambassadors, and other lesser posts. This authority is shared by several state senates, which discuss with and approve the governor's appointments of state department heads, judges, and other statewide authorities (in some states).Learn more about the Constitution of US with the help of the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/838122
#SPJ4
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
Give an example of another criminal justice practice, program, or policy in Canada that you believe to be more influenced by factors (e.g., morals, ethics, politics, economics) other than evidence. Explain your views.
Another example of criminal justice policy in Canada which I believe to be a more more influenced factor is PARTNER VIOLENCE
In Canada, there has been three different police responses to partner violence. Strict measures of punishment are usually administered because it is a domestic violence. As a matter of fact there is no specific offence of family violence in the Criminal Code, most acts of family violence are crimes in Canada. These offences are usually related to the use of physical and se-xual violenceCanada criminal justice systemIn Canada, the criminal justice system is designed to ensure public safety by protecting the society from those who violate the law. The system does and regulate this by stating the types of behaviours that are unacceptable and defining the nature and severity of the punishment for a given offence.
Learn more about the criminal justice system:
https://brainly.com/question/5111667
is impeachment strictly political? Explain
Answer:
yes it is, the two sides (republicans and democrates) have to vote to have an impeachment, tho the public has say in stuff all the time, there needs to be 17 or more votes from the political party, in trumps case it was republicans, but they can also convict trump if he wasn’t impeached.
Explanation:
only the licensee not the server can be charged criminally for serving a minor. t/f
False. Both the licensee (establishment owner) and the server can be charged criminally for serving a minor, depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
The responsibility for serving alcohol to a minor varies depending on the laws and regulations of each jurisdiction. In many jurisdictions, both the licensee (establishment owner) and the server can be held criminally liable for serving alcohol to a minor. This means that if a minor is served alcohol at an establishment, both the licensee and the server may face legal consequences.
The rationale behind holding both parties accountable is to ensure that there is a shared responsibility in preventing the sale or provision of alcohol to underage individuals. However, it is important to note that specific laws and penalties can vary by jurisdiction, so it is necessary to consult the relevant laws and regulations in a particular area to determine the exact legal implications.
Learn more about jurisdiction here : brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Which is an example of discretionary spending?
A. Education
B. Social security
C.medicare
D.federal taxes
Question 7 of 10
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade with
wealthy partners.
B. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade.
O C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade.
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade.
Answer: C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more favorable terms of trade.
Explanation:
Just got it right!
in relation to marijuana traffic stops in kansas, the case of horton v. california effectively removed which requirement, previously embedded in the application of the plain view doctrine in warrantless search and seizures?
The United States Supreme Court dealt with the plain view doctrine in the case of a Horton v. California which discussed warrantless search and seizure.
In the Horton v. California case, the requirement that law enforcement officers have reasonable cause to believe that an item in plain view is contraband or proof of a crime before they can seize it without a warrant was eliminated. The plain view doctrine called for officers to have a legal right of access to the object and a strong suspicion that it is related criminal to activity prior to this case.
The Supreme Court ruled in Horton, however, that the requirement of a lawful right of access was unnecessary and that police only required probable cause to take something out of plain sight without a warrant.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
which type of damages are foreseeable damages that result from special facts and circumstances arising outside a contract itself? multiple choice compensatory damages nominal damages equitable damages consequential damages
Consequential damages are foreseeable damages that result from special facts and circumstances arising outside a contract itself.
What are Consequential damages?
Damages that can be demonstrated to have happened as a result of a party's failure to uphold a contractual commitment, or a breach of contract, are referred to as consequential damages, also known as special damages. Legally speaking, a contract is present when it satisfies the following criteria: it is expressed by a valid offer and acceptance, has sufficient consideration, mutual assent, capability, and legality. Consequential damages cover acts that result from a breach of the contract in addition to the contract itself. The guidelines or computations pertaining to a particular sort of damages can change depending on the type of claim giving rise to the damages, such as whether it is a breach of contract action or a tort claim. As an illustration, consequential damages are one kind of expectation damage that may occur in contract law.
To know more about Consequential damages refer:
https://brainly.com/question/11489978
#SPJ4
Please answer this......
When will America make us require in this year, microchip implanted in humans in 2020-2021?
Answer:
america will not force us to get the microchips but they might give us the option in 2011
Explanation:
teen driver ____ lead to a far greater crash risk than just being a new driver
a. inexperience and immaturity
b. experience and age
c. maturity and age
Answer:
un. inexpérience et immaturité
Explanation:
According to Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu, which option leads to human suffering? A. poverty B. greed C. compassion D. violence
A and D
Hope this helps
Answer: B
Explanation:
The theory draws from Tibetan Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu's principles to determine the causes of human suffering. According to the master, suffering is a result of six emotions: desire, anger, GREED, jealousy, pride, and ignorance.
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
Greg approaches a local dealer to buy a new car which costs $10,000. He wishes to seek finance to buy the car. The auto dealer asks for a co-signer as surety to sell the car on credit. Greg approaches his friend Claire to co-sign on the agreement. Claire agrees and becomes a surety for Greg's car. Which of the following is true in this case?
a.
Claire is secondarily liable for the payment.
b.
Claire is primarily liable for the payment.
c.
Claire is liable only if the auto dealer has exhausted all other remedies.
d.
Claire is not liable for the payment
The correct statement in the given case is Claire is secondarily liable for the payment. Option a is correct.
In this case, Claire acts as a co-signer or surety for Greg's car purchase. By agreeing to be a co-signer, Claire assumes the responsibility of ensuring the payment if Greg fails to fulfill his obligations.
However, Greg is primarily responsible for making the payments on the car loan. If Greg defaults on the payments, the auto dealer can first attempt to collect from Greg. If Greg is unable to make the payments, then Claire, as the co-signer, becomes secondarily liable and may be pursued for payment.
Therefore, a is correct.
Learn more about payment https://brainly.com/question/32320091
#SPJ11