Answer:
Northern Europe
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Northern Europe
To what extent can historical events and their consequences be attributed to individual actions versus broader societal forces and structural factors?
Explanation:
The extent to which historical events and their consequences can be attributed to individual actions versus broader societal forces and structural factors is a complex and debated topic in historical analysis. Different historians may have different perspectives and emphasize different factors depending on their theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and interpretations of historical evidence. Here are some key points to consider:
Individual Actions:
1. Great individuals and their actions: Some historical events can be significantly influenced by the actions and decisions of specific individuals who played pivotal roles. These individuals may have had unique qualities, skills, or leadership abilities that shaped the course of events.
2. Agency and contingency: Individual actions can introduce contingencies and unforeseen consequences that may alter the course of history. The decisions made by individuals can have ripple effects and shape the trajectory of events.
Societal Forces and Structural Factors:
1. Social, economic, and political structures: Broader societal forces such as economic systems, political ideologies, social hierarchies, and cultural norms can shape the possibilities and constraints within which individuals operate. These structural factors can influence the choices available to individuals and impact the outcomes of historical events.
2. Collective actions and movements: Historical events often arise from collective actions and movements driven by societal forces such as revolutions, social movements, or shifts in public opinion. These movements are fueled by the actions and collaboration of many individuals, highlighting the significance of collective agency.
3. Long-term trends and systemic factors: Structural factors can shape long-term trends and historical developments. Factors like technological advancements, demographic changes, and geopolitical shifts can have profound impacts that transcend individual actions.
It is important to recognize that historical events are often the result of a complex interplay between individual actions and broader societal forces. The relative influence of these factors may vary depending on the specific context, the scale of analysis, and the specific event being studied. Historians strive to understand and evaluate the interactions between individual agency and structural forces to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of historical events.
Answer:Most historians of sociology agree that the historical event that lead to the establishment of sociology was the Industrial Revolution. However, the French Revolution also played a critical part in the establishment of sociology.
Explanation:
Which statements best describe the beliefs of Patriots during the colonial era?
Select each correct answer.
A. They believed that the British government knew what was best for the colonies.
B. They believed the colonies were capable of governing themselves.
C. They believed that war should be avoided at all costs.
D. They believed that freedom was important.
Justifiable for the United State to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?
Answer:
While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.
When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.
Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:
After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.
I just need the information please. What would it be for the Virginia Plan, and I already know who the creator was, it was James Madison.
Select all the correct answers.
Which two sentences explain the North's opposition to the use of slavery in the South?
The population of enslaved people increased the South's representation in Congress.
Northerners saw slavery as an immoral and unjust practice.
Northern farmers couldn’t compete with Southern plantations supported by the labor of enslaved people.
Southerners refused to trade enslaved people with plantation owners in the North.
The North believed that slavery prevented the South from using modern farm equipment.
Answer:
2 and 3 :) I took the test
Explanation:
Write a short essay on: What were the positive and negative impacts the Crusades had on the world?
please help meeeeeeeee
brainest
Answer:
The secession of South Carolina was followed by the secession of six more states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas–and the threat of secession by four more—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina. These eleven states eventually formed the Confederate States of America.
Explanation:
Identify 2 things that Europeans wanted to find in the East.
Answer:
The two main reasons for European exploration were to gain new sources of wealth. By exploring the seas, traders hoped to find new, faster routes to Asia—the source of spices and luxury goods. Another reason for exploration was spreading Christianity to new lands.
Explanation:
PLS HELP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO FASTEST AND CORRECT PERSON! GIVE AN EXPLANATION ALSO IN ORDER TO RECIEVE BRAINLIEST!!!
The Patriots fighting on their home land was an advantage because –
A. they were able to sleep in their beds unlike the Redcoats
B. they knew the terrain better than their opponents allowing them to travel faster as well as hide
C. they were able to use the riffles they were comfortable with
D. Britain caught diseases in the “New World” they were not accustomed to
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The patriots advantages included fighting on their home ground; fighting for the freedom of their own land, which gave them an advantage over the hired Hessians of the British army; and their brilliant leader George Washington.
Hi! Please help! I will mark the first person to answer brainliest!!
Answer:
those answers look correct your all set
Explanation:
I think that the Underground Railroad was/not significant as form of resistance because...
A major agricultural product of the West Indies was _____.
pls help ill mark brainliest!! <3
Read the following quote from mill worker Lucy Larcom. Then answer the question.
In this quote, Larcom is describing a dressing-frame, a machine she uses at work.
What is Larcom’s main complaint about factory work?
1. She doesn’t earn enough money.
2. She dislikes the speed of the machinery.
3. She doesn’t have enough work to do.
She dislikes the speed of the machinery
Sure hopes this helps you
Answer:
she dislikes the speed of the machinery
Explanation:
mark brainliest!!
how did Geroge Washington as president increase the federal government's power
Answer:
B. He approved higher federal taxes on the states.
Explanation:
A. He shut down all banks other than the Bank of the United States.
B. He approved higher federal taxes on the states.
C. He banned immigrants from serving in government.
D. He refused to protect state governments from rebellions.
Our country's first president, George Washington, had a difficult time with tax policy in the late 18th century; testing the nation with a tax crisis, as previously there was no tax policy and the state had to pay.
how do you think the Olmec justified human sacrifices
Explanation:
These rituals of human sacrifice and bloodletting were probably performed to appease the Olmec gods, who were a combination of human and animal forms, both male and female. They could have also been used as a way to control the people through a mixture of spiritual beliefs and fear.
What was one difference between monastic and mendicant religious orders?
A. )Monastic orders were made up of friars; mendicant orders were made up of monks.
B. )Monastic orders were made up of monks; mendicant orders were made up of friars.
C. )Monastic orders were made up of monks; mendicant orders were made up of
D. )Muslims. Monastic orders were made up of Muslims; mendicant orders were made up of monks
Answer:
Explanation:
Then answer is B
PLEASE HELP THIS IS ALL MY 44 POINTS ILL ALSO GIVE BRAINLIEST TO FIRST PERSON WHO ANSWERS THIS ( please do all 3 )
Write a 5-7 sentence description of each person below and include an image of each ( you don't have to do the image part ill do that myself)
The people:
Siddhartha Gautama
Asoka
Mohandas Gandhi
Then explain if you think each person made a positive impact on Ancient Indian society. Why or why not?
help me answer this pls
Answer:1 is general granger 2
Explanation:
Based on these maps, which state listed below was located in the Southeast Native American cultural region?
California
Texas
Florida
Washington
Answer:
Florida
Explanation:
United States got Florida from Spain in 1819
americaslibrarygov
historystategov
Which of the following is the best example of civil disobedience? refusing to pay taxes because you disapprove of how the money is being used by the government not paying for a shirt at the store because you feel it was a product of child labor driving through stop signs because you believe there are too many in your neighborhood protesting outside the local jail because you feel inmates are being treated unfairly
Answer:
The answer is A on edgen
Explanation:
I just took the test
The best example of civil disobedience is refusing to pay taxes because you disapprove of how the money is being used by the government.
What best describes civil disobedience?Civil disobedience can be defined as refusing to obey a law, a regulation or a power judged unjustly in a peaceful manner. Civil disobedience is, therefore, a form of resistance without violence.
What is one act of civil disobedience?Choosing not to pay taxes to a government participating in unjust laws was Thoreau's idea of civil disobedience.
Learn more about civil disobedience here https://brainly.com/question/325929
#SPJ2
Read the quotation:
"The American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers"—President James Monroe, December 1823
Which of the following explains why President Monroe said this?
He wanted to build the U.S. military and work toward Latin American independence.
He wanted to make sure Congress knew he was not going to use war to enforce his doctrine.
He wanted to show that the United States would no longer allow new European colonies in the Western Hemisphere.
He wanted to use his new doctrine to hide U.S. intentions to annex parts of Europe.
Answer:President James Monroe said this to show that the United States would no longer allow new European colonies in the Western Hemisphere. This is known as the Monroe Doctrine, which was a U.S. foreign policy statement that declared the American continents off-limits to further colonization by any European powers. The statement was made in 1823, at a time when many Latin American countries were fighting for their independence from Spain and Portugal, and European powers were considering intervention in the region to protect their economic interests.
President Monroe wanted to make it clear that the United States would not tolerate any European attempts to establish new colonies in the Americas. This was seen as a way to protect the new nations of Latin America from European imperialism, but it was also a way for the United States to assert its dominance in the region. The Monroe Doctrine became an important part of U.S. foreign policy, and it was used to justify American interventions in the region throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries.
President James Monroe made a statement in December 1823, which became known as the Monroe Doctrine.
The purpose of the Monroe Doctrine was to declare that the American continents were off-limits to further colonization by any European powers.
President Monroe wanted to ensure that the United States would not tolerate any new European colonies in the Western Hemisphere.
The Monroe Doctrine was meant to protect the new nations of Latin America from European imperialism, but it was also a way for the United States to assert its dominance in the region.
The Monroe Doctrine became an important part of U.S. foreign policy, and it was used to justify American interventions in the region throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries.
References:
"Monroe Doctrine," Encyclopædia Britannica, accessed May 14, 2023, https://www.britannica.com/event/Monroe-Doctrine.
"Monroe Doctrine," U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian, accessed May 14, 2023, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1801-1829/monroe.
MATCH THESE ITEMS PLEASE
Answer:
1. Rev. John smith - martyr
2. Aluminum - bauxite
3.Netherland - Tropical Diseases
4. El dorado -Chief of Gold
5. Devils Island -prison
6. Cayenne pepper - Spice
7. American Orange Juice - Suriname Citrus
8. Queen - Pasteur Institue
9. Carib Indians - Cannibals
10. Daniel Defoe - Robin Crusoe
I don't know for sure if this is all right but I hope its right I worked really hard finding these answers lol:)
1. Rev- John Smith - Robinson Crusoe
2. aluminum - bauxite
3. studied tropical disease - Pasteur Institute
4. chief of gold - El Dorado
5. French prison - Devil's Island
6. Cayenne pepper - Suriname citrus
7. American orange juice - Suriname citrus
8. Queen - Netherlands
9. Carib Indians - cannibals
10. Daniel Defoe - Robinson Crusoe.
What is the common thread that runs through all the terms above ?Note that the common thread that runs through all the terms above is their association with South America and its historical and cultural aspects.
The terms encompass various elements related to the region, such as its geography (El Dorado), historical figures (Rev- John Smith, Queen), indigenous populations (Carib Indians), colonial history (French prison, Devil's Island), resources (aluminum, bauxite), and literary works (Robinson Crusoe, Daniel Defoe).
Learn more about Robinson Crusoe:
https://brainly.com/question/1624877
#SPJ1
What physical feature shown here influenced the Incan civilization? (4 points)
a
The Amazon Basin
b
The Andes Mountains
c
The Brazilian Highlands
d
The Guiana Highlands
Use the map below to answer the following question:
Answer:
the answer would be B.The Andes Mountains
Explanation:
What's in a name? Events in history often get named in various ways, based on the time and perspective in which they are studied and based on the different viewpoints people have of the event. Think of several different ways you could name the War of Independence. How would different names for the war change how people see or think about the war? Please explain your answer
The Revolutionary War
Wars of Independence
Explanation The Revolutionary WarThe Revolutionary War (1775-83), also known as the American Revolution, arose from growing tensions between residents of Great Britain's 13 North American colonies and the colonial government, which represented the British crown.
2. People usually don’t take kindly to commands and demands. For as long as people have been overpowering one another, there has been resistance to power. And for as long as states have been ruling one another, there have been wars of independence. Here is a list of six groups of people or individual states that have battled against controlling powers in their own wars of independence.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIESTThe American Revolution Independence Wars Growing hostilities between citizens of Great Britain's 13 North American colonies and the colonial administration .
What was Revolutionary War ?Growing hostilities between citizens of Great Britain's 13 North American colonies and the colonial administration, which represented the British crown, led to the Revolutionary War (1775–83), also known as the American Revolution.
Demands and instructions are typically not well received by people. There has always been opposition to power, as long as people have been dominating one another. Additionally, independence wars have existed for as long as states have been controlling one another. The following are six examples of people or states that have fought for their independence from tyrannical regimes.
The war began in April 1775 with clashes between British forces and colonial militiamen at Lexington and Concord The rebels had already begun a full-scale struggle for their independence by the following summer.
13 of Britain's North American colonies rebelled against its imperial rule, sparking an epic political and military conflict known as the American Revolution that lasted from 1765 to 1783. The British crown and Parliament's imposition of taxes without the consent of the colonial population sparked the initial revolt.
Learn more about Revolution War here
https://brainly.com/question/29706701
#SPJ2
I am Chester Arthur . I was the 21st president. I was a reformer. I gave much power to the __________. People who wanted government jobs had to take an examination. My reforms probably cost me the nomination for a second term.
HELPPPPPPPPP I WIL GIVE BRAINLIST
Answer:
Civil Service Commission
Explanation:
Hope it helped
PLEASE HELP! THIS IS PART OF A PROJECT THAT'S DUE TODAY THAT I HAVEN'T STARTED ON!!!! I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!
Can someone create a short summary of Thomas Jefferson's outlook of the Whiskey Rebellion and what he would say to Alexander Hamilton on why it was bad?
Answer:
The rebels needed to be punished for their crimes. The rebels should be treated like national heroes. The rebellion proved that Hamilton's plans were oppressive to common people.The Whiskey Rebellion was a 1794 uprising of farmers and distillers in western Pennsylvania in protest of a whiskey tax enacted by the federal government. ... Opposition to the whiskey tax and the rebellion itself built support for the Republicans, who overtook Washington's Federalist Party for power in 1802. A whiskey tax imposed by Congress in 1791 was the reason for the Whiskey Rebellion. ... Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton (1755–1804) proposed that the federal government assume responsibility for all the debts and pay them off with funds collected from various taxes, including the whiskey tax.
PLEASE HELP!! WILL MARK BRAINLY!! 13 POINTS!!
Imagine that you are a colonist; how would you feel about the outcome of the French and Indian War? (Think about new laws and policies created.)
Answer:
plz mark me as BRAINLY
Explanation:
if i was a colonist in the outcome of the French and Indian War would be very scary to me. there would be a whole lot of laws, I feel like the police would always be lined up on the streets and that would scare me a whole lot more than the French and Indian War. it would be like they were just waiting to arrest you for some little law.
Which of the following are TRUE about Britain’s East India Trading Company?
Check all that are true.
A) The East India Trading Company eventually took command of Britain’s territory on the Indian subcontinent.
B) The East India Trading Company always shared its territory with other European trading posts on the Indian subcontinent.
C) The East India Trading Company began forcefully controlling the political and economic affairs on the Indian subcontinent.
D) The East India Trading Company first arrived on the Indian subcontinent to set up trading posts.
Claudio gathers four sources to research a current environmental problem. Which one is most likely to be credible?
a set of statistics that were collected in 1980
an interview with a scientist conducted last year
an opinion blog written by a high school student in 2018
a wiki site that was updated yesterday by an online user
Answer:
An interview with a scientist conducted last year
Explanation:
This is the most credible because it comes from a credible source, a scientist. It is also relevant.
An interview with a scientist conducted last year ,is one of the credible sources of the four sources gathered by Claudio on research for a current environmental problem.
Hence, the correct answer is option B. an interview with a scientist conducted last year.
Interview?According to Scott and others, "an interview is a planned exchange of ideas, the responding of questions, and conversation between two or more individuals." A "conversation with a purpose" is how Bingham and others characterize an interview.
What happens during an interview?For the purpose of hiring new staff, the interview process involves many stages. Writing a job description, advertising a position, arranging interviews, doing phone interviews, conducting in-person interviews, following up with candidates, and hiring a candidate are all common processes in the interview process.
To know more about Interview visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15128068
#SPJ1
was Hitler was kicked out of the League of Nations for invading the Rhineland.
Answer: No
Explanation: Please give brainliest I am so close to the next rank.