Answers
During an investigation, police officers find illegal drugs while searching a home for which they did not acquire a warrant. The exclusionary rule would prevent the drugs from being used as evidence at trial.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle based on constitutional law in the United States that forbids the use of evidence gathered or examined in defiance of the defendant's constitutional-rights in a court of law. This might be viewed as an illustration of a preventative rule created by the judiciary to safeguard a constitutional right. The Fifth Amendment's prohibitions that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" and that no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law" may be considered to directly follow from the Constitution in some instances, if not all.
For more info about 'exclusionary rule' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/28899354
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Probation officers primarily work with
a. victims of crime
b. offenders
c. legal and court officials
d. law enforcement officials
Answers
which of the following is classification system that uses the degree to which an offender is likely to recidivate and the amount of help required?
Answers
Criminal history, youth at discharge, and neighborhood characteristics were the three variables most frequently linked to the probability of recidivism across conditions.
How do you gauge the likelihood of recidivism?Recidivism is commonly calculated as the percentage of criminals in the cohort who have successfully completed the obey period who have participated in at least one recidivist incident.
What are the primary reasons recidivism occurs?Numerous factors can contribute to recidivism, such as social interactions while incarcerated, a lack of job and financial opportunity, depression, a failure to reintegrate into society, an invariable lifestyle and circle after release, and the failure to address the underlying issues that lead to crime while incarcerated.
To know more about risk of recidivism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19113884
#SPJ4
Explain how common law was imposed on the commonwealth countries.
Answers
The common law was imposed on the Commonwealth countries where the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth were founded on English common law.
The common law is considered to be the law which is declared by the judges, derived from precedent and custom. Thus, it is said to originate with the legal reforms of King Henry II in the 12th century and was called “common” because it tend to apply equally across the whole country.
So, it is said that the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth are founded on English common law. Where it is purely not the case, the system is applied in interlocked or parallel with other legal systems.
Hence, the English common law originated in the early Middle Ages.
To learn more about the common law here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ1
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answers
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
The failure on the part of a police officer to accurately document in a report the reasons why an individual was stopped, questioned without
having been provided information regarding his constitutional rights, and subsequently arrested as a suspect in unnamed criminal activity
would violate which provisions of the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
the First Amendment right to free speech
the Sixth Amendment right of an individual to be informed of the charges pending against him or her
the Fifth Amendment right to due process
the Second Amendment right to bear arms
Answers
Answer:
It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!
Explanation:
It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.
This provides a secure point of attachment for lifelines, lanyards, or deceleration devices. What is depicted
Answers
Have a paid subscription and want to cancel but when i request a password reset i get nothing in spam or regular email. Need this canceled asap. or will file charge dispute with my bank.
Answers
Answer: Call their customer service line if they have a number posted
Explanation:
the political organizations of the northeastern tribes. include two examples of confederacies.
Answers
Answer:
One was based on linguistic and cultural affiliation and comprised tribes made up of bands (for predominantly mobile groups) or villages (for more sedentary peoples). The other was based on kinship and included nuclear families, clans, and groups of clans called moieties or phratries.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
There are current and future paradigm shifts in health care that affect the leadership skills needed by nurses in the twenty-first century. What issue at the organizational and unit levels are nurse-leaders being directed to address? A) Active involvement in greatly needed health-care reform
B) Persistent and growing international nursing shortage
C) Shortage of qualified first-level nursing managers
D) High turnover rates by staff nurses
Answers
The issue at the organizational and unit levels that nurse-leaders are being directed to address is High turnover rates by staff nurses. The correct option is D.
The high staff nurse turnover rates, which can have a significant impact on patient care quality, organizational costs, and workforce stability, are a challenge for nurse leaders to address. They must come up with plans to increase nurse job satisfaction deal with issues that lead to burnout, offer assistance and resources for career advancement and cultivate an environment that encourages retention.
Nurse leaders can contribute to the stability and efficiency of the nursing workforce, improving patient outcomes and fostering organizational success by focusing on lowering turnover rates.
Learn more about workforce stability at:
brainly.com/question/32314029
#SPJ4
If one strand of DNA has the genetic code: TTGAGCTAC its complementary strand
would read:
Answers
Answer:
AACTCGATG
Explanation:
in most circumstances, a supreme court is best described as a(n) court. group of answer choices
Answers
A Supreme Court is best described as an appellate court. In most circumstances, it is the highest judicial authority in a jurisdiction, responsible for hearing appeals from lower courts and ensuring the consistent application of laws. The primary function of a Supreme Court is to review and decide on cases that involve significant legal issues or constitutional matters, providing clarity and guidance for future legal decisions.
This helps to maintain a stable and consistent legal system. These justices serve for life and can only be removed by impeachment. The Supreme Court hears cases from all over the country and decides on issues that affect the entire nation.
Some of the most important cases in US history have been decided by the Supreme Court, such as Brown v. Board of Education, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional, and Roe v. Wade, which established a woman's right to choose to have an abortion.
Know more about legal system here:
https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ11
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a ______________ for the year
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a budget surplus for the year. A budget surplus occurs when the government's revenue exceeds its expenses, which can be used to pay down debt, invest in infrastructure or public services, or returned to taxpayers through tax cuts or rebates.
Intellectual property can be legally protected even though it is not a physical object true or false?.
Answers
Intellectual property can be legally protected even though it is not a physical object. This statement is true.
Intellectual property (IP) refers to the set of property rights that arise from the creation of the mind. Some examples of intellectual property include inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols and names.
The term intellectual property refers to creations of the mind such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. Intellectual property is intangible, meaning it cannot be touched or seen. However, it is protected by law. Intellectual property rights are rights given to individuals over the creations of their minds, allowing them to control the use of their creations for a limited time.
Learn more about Intellectual property
https://brainly.com/question/30554069
#SPJ11
should the police be given the full power to control itscitizens? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
No, they should not. Police don't always know what is right and they can make mistakes. They should stick to protecting their citizens and not controlling. They should leave that to the government.
If maybe police had to be given full power to control its citizens they would need a lot more practices, and they would need more training. Their job would be much harder.
But altogether I don't think they should.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Three possible impacts of violent service delivery protests in south african communities
Answers
The possible impacts that may take place off the violent protests of the service delivery in South African communities are,
Lowered standard of LivingIncreased rate of UnemploymentLack of availability of resources What are violent protests?The social gatherings conducted by a group of individuals with similar intentions and ideologies where violence may lead to activities like innocent killings, and other harms to social peace and harmony are known as violent protests.
Hence, the significance of violent protests is aforementioned.
Learn more about violent protests here:
https://brainly.com/question/855927
#SPJ1
The Fourteenth Amendment establishes that no state can be allowed to remove any rights of citizens, that all persons who are born in the US or naturalized have citizenship regardless of race, that no person can be denied equal protection under the law, and that no person can be deprived of his or life, liberty, or property without a fair trial.
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.
Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.
3. What are the main points of similarity and differences between the two types of persons?
Answers
Answer:
Similarities:
1. Both types of persons are subject to the same laws and regulations.
2. Both types of persons are protected by the same rights and freedoms.
3. Both types of persons are subject to the same criminal and civil penalties.
Differences:
1. Natural persons are physical individuals, while legal persons are entities created by law, such as corporations, trusts, and other organizations.
2. Natural persons have certain rights and responsibilities that legal persons do not, such as the right to vote and the responsibility to pay taxes.
3. Natural persons are subject to certain legal restrictions that do not apply to legal persons, such as age restrictions and the inability to enter into certain contracts.
Refusing to hire or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as ethnicity, religion, or gender is referred to as workplace.
Answers
Refusing to employ or promote an individual or making other employment decisions based upon factors such as race, religion, or gender is referred to as workplace ratification.
RatificationRatify means to authorize or enact a legally binding act that would not otherwise be critical in the absence of such permission. In the constitutional context, countries may ratify an modification to an existing/adoption of a new constitution.
Ratification describes the international act whereby a state signifies its consent to be attached to a treaty if the parties intended to show their approval by such an act.
To learn more about ratification visit the link-
https://brainly.com/question/23842955
#SPJ4
Answer: workplace discrimination
Explanation:
if a corporation’s stock is traded on the major stock exchanges, the corporation must generally report periodically to a federal agency known as the
Answers
The corporation must generally report periodically to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) if its stock is traded on major stock exchanges.
In summary, the SEC is a federal agency responsible for regulating securities markets and protecting investors. Corporations with stocks traded on major exchanges must submit periodic reports to ensure compliance and maintain transparency.
Step by step explanation:
1. The SEC was established in 1934 to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities market. It enforces federal securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
2. Publicly traded corporations are required to register their securities with the SEC. This registration process includes providing detailed information about the company, its management, and its financial condition.
3. Once registered, corporations must submit periodic reports to the SEC. These reports include annual reports (Form 10-K), quarterly reports (Form 10-Q), and current reports (Form 8-K) for significant events. These filings provide investors with important financial data and updates on the company's operations.
4. The SEC reviews these reports to ensure that corporations are adhering to disclosure requirements and providing accurate, timely information to investors. If discrepancies or violations are discovered, the SEC can take enforcement actions against the company or its management.
5. By requiring publicly traded corporations to report to the SEC, the agency aims to promote transparency, prevent fraud, and maintain a fair and efficient securities market, ultimately protecting investors and contributing to economic growth.
Know more about the Securities and Exchange Commission click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9089676
#SPJ11
during the nineteenth century, party machines depended heavily on ________ in order to reward loyal party supporters.
Answers
During the nineteenth century, party machines in the United States depended heavily on patronage, also known as the spoils system, in order to reward loyal party supporters.
Under the spoils system, elected officials appointed individuals to government positions based on their political loyalty and support, rather than their qualifications or merit.
This allowed party machines to maintain power and control by rewarding their supporters with jobs and other benefits, while also ensuring their loyalty through the threat of punishment for disloyalty.
The spoils system was widely used by both the Democratic and Republican parties during the nineteenth century, but it was also criticized for promoting corruption and inefficiency in government.
The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883, which established a merit-based civil service system, was a major reform effort aimed at reducing the influence of patronage in government appointments.
To know more about patronage here:
https://brainly.com/question/29870571
#SPJ4
which u.s. supreme court case upheld the principle of implied powers?
Answers
The United States Supreme Court case that upheld the principle of implied powers is McCulloch v. Maryland.
McCulloch v. Maryland, decided in 1819, involved a dispute over the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland's attempt to tax the bank. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing the majority opinion, addressed the issue of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8).
The Supreme Court held that the creation of the Second Bank of the United States was within the scope of Congress's implied powers. Marshall's opinion established the doctrine of implied powers, stating that Congress possesses powers not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as long as they are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.
This landmark decision affirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and solidified the doctrine of implied powers, providing a broad interpretation of federal authority. McCulloch v. Maryland remains an influential case in constitutional law and has shaped the understanding of implied powers in the United States.
To learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/546157
#SPJ11
Which statement alligns with the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs board of education
Answers
Answer:
Separate treatment based on race is inherently unequal.
Explanation:
in united states versus verdugo urquidez, the supreme court has held that constitutional protections do not obtain in u.s. government actions against foreign nationals on ______________.
Answers
In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, the supreme court held that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
What happened in the case of United States v Verdugo Urquidez?In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, a Mexican national was arrested and his property was searched by U.S. agents. He was then brought to the United States to face drug charges. The defendant contended that his Fourth Amendment rights of the Constitution had been breached by the search and seizure of his house in Mexico, as well as by the search of his vehicle in the United States, without a warrant.
The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution does not cover illegal searches and seizures carried out by US government officials on foreign soil and that the protections under it do not extend to foreign nationals outside the United States. As a result, the search did not breach the Fourth Amendment.
Henceforth the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v Verdugo Urquidez, that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
Learn more about U.S. constitutional protections at: https://brainly.in/question/5984704
#SPJ11
jonathan kozol criticizes the u.s. educational system for ________
Answers
Jonathan Kozol criticizes the U.S. educational system for its inequities and inequalities.
He draws attention to the differences between schools in wealthy neighborhoods and those in less affluent ones in terms of funding, resources, and educational opportunities. According to Kozol, these inequalities keep marginalized students particularly students of color at a disadvantage in their educational pursuits. He criticizes unequal access to high quality education, subpar school infrastructure, crammed classrooms and a lack of funding for low income schools.
Kozol also discusses issues like tracking systems, racial segregation, and the effect of standardized testing on underprivileged students. He supports educational reforms that aim to eliminate systemic inequalities in the educational system and give all students equal access to education.
Learn more about Jonathan Kozol at:
brainly.com/question/31625694
#SPJ4
allow bartenders and bar owners to be held liable for a plaintiff’s injury although the bartender or bar owner did not directly cause the plaintiff’s injury.
Answers
In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."
Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.
If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.
It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.
To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11
What aspect of the Constitution was brought up as the central issue regarding the health care reform law?
Answers
The central issue regarding the health care reform law and the Constitution was the individual mandate. The mandate required individuals to purchase health insurance or face a penalty.
Opponents argued that Congress did not have the authority under the Commerce Clause to require individuals to purchase a product. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld the individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power. This decision set a precedent for the scope of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and the limits of the federal government's authority in regulating individual behavior.
For more such questions on insurance , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28562565
#SPJ11
Safety data sheets are only required when there are 10 gallons or more of a chemical present within a facility. True or false?.
Answers
Safety data sheets are the simplest required whilst there are 10 gallons or greater of a chemical present inside a facility is TRUE An SDS is needed in almost every case until there is largely no way that the amount of material should reason damage.
A datasheet is a report, revealed or digital that provides information about a product, like a laptop, pc component, or software program program. The datasheet includes facts that allow in creating a shopping for choice approximately a product by way of imparting technical specs about the product.
A datasheet is commonly used for industrial or technical conversation to explain the characteristics of an item or product. it could be published by means of the manufacturer to help people select products or to assist the use of the goods.
A datasheet shape helps you to display statistics from multiple reports at a time. The information is organized in rows and columns and multiple pieces of information are displayed at a time. A datasheet is a visible representation of the facts contained in a table, or of the effects again by a query.
Learn more about the datasheet here:
https://brainly.com/question/24756209
#SPJ4
How can a state such as Colorado control avalanches?
They can use mortars, a weapon that shoots an explosive projectile into the snowpack, causing it to fall when there is no danger to property or people
below
The can send crews up to the avalanche area to remove much of the snow by sled and trough
They can use expensive but very hot lamps to melt the snow before it falls
They can send volunteers on snowshoes up to the avalanche area to stomp it down to hard-packed snow
Answers
Answer: They can use mortars, a weapon that shoots an explosive projectile into the snowpack, causing it to fall when there is no danger to property or people below
Explanation:
Colorado is known for its ski resorts which are some of the best in the country but this comes with some risk as Colorado has seen a lot of death from avalanches in the state.
To reduce these unfortunate incidents, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is very proactive when it comes to avalanche control.
One way they control avalanches is to use explosives. One sort of explosives they have is the mortar which they are able to direct into a snowpack such that it explodes and dislodges the pack, causing it to fall where there is little danger to people and property.
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answers
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation: