Answers
Documents filed by non-litigants that contain information and arguments for the judges or justices to consider are called amicus curiae briefs.
The term "amicus curiae" translates to "friend of the court" in Latin. These briefs are filed by individuals, organizations, or entities that are not directly involved in the case but have an interest in its outcome or possess relevant expertise or perspective. Amicus briefs provide additional information, legal analysis, and policy arguments to assist the court in reaching a well-informed decision.
Amicus curiae briefs serve several important purposes. First, they offer a broader range of viewpoints and arguments, providing the court with a more comprehensive understanding of the legal issues at hand. These briefs often present unique legal arguments or present alternative interpretations of existing law, enriching the court's analysis.
Second, amicus briefs bring attention to the broader implications of a case. They highlight potential societal or industry impacts, policy considerations, or constitutional concerns that may extend beyond the immediate parties involved. This information assists the court in considering the potential consequences of its decision and shaping the law accordingly.
Furthermore, amicus briefs allow non-litigants to contribute their expertise or perspective on complex legal matters. These briefs are often submitted by advocacy groups, professional associations, academic institutions, or other entities with specialized knowledge or experience in a particular field.
know more about amicus curiae briefs here:
https://brainly.com/question/31764627
#SPJ11
Related Questions
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Which term is used to describe the official judgement stating the guilt or liability of the defendant concerning the issue in question?
Answers
Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the decision of either a jury or a judge, that a person accused is not guilty of the crime for which he has been tried
I hope this is what your kind of looking for!
sorry if it isn't!
Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial; the accused is also referred to as the defendant. A person is declared innocent of the offence for which they have been convicted in court upon being found not guilty by a jury or a judge.
What is judgment?A court's official decision establishing the relative rights and claims of the parties to a lawsuit. The court's constitutional right to hear a case and make a decision.
Moral judgements about what is right or wrong in character traits, such as virtues or vices. Moral judgments about what is right or wrong in action. Moral judgments about what is good or evil in people.
A judgment is the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal. Following the judges' review of all relevant evidence from the legal trial as well as of all rights and obligations, the plaintiff and defendant will get the final verdict.
Thus, Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial.
For more information about judgment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ6
Balance of power is a state of stability between competing forces and states discuss the statement in line with indo-pak relations and application of balance of power theory
Answers
The balance of power theory applies to Indo-Pak relations by emphasizing the need to prevent one side from becoming too dominant.
The application of the balance of power theory in the context of Indo-Pak relations is essential. According to the theory maintaining a stable state necessitates the equitable distribution of power among opposing forces or states. Both India and Pakistan have experienced numerous wars and tense situations over the years.
According to the theory of the balance of power, instability and hostility can result from letting one side become overly dominant. Therefore, efforts are made to promote equality of opportunity and deter conflict as well as to prevent a power imbalance.
This is demonstrated by the involvement of the international community in mediating conflicts between the two countries and in promoting communication and diplomacy. To maintain stability, peace and deterrence in Indo-Pak relations, the balanced power structure principle is upheld.
To know more about power theory here
brainly.com/question/30019719
#SPJ4
which of the following statements is not true regarding a presentence investigation (psi)?
Answers
The following statement is not true regarding a presentence investigation (PSI).
A presentence investigation (PSI) is a comprehensive assessment conducted by probation officers or other authorized individuals to gather information about an offender before sentencing. It is used to provide the court with relevant information to make an informed decision regarding the appropriate sentence for the convicted individual. The PSI report typically includes details about the offender's personal and criminal history, social and family background, employment and education, substance abuse history, and any other relevant factors.
Based on this understanding, the statement "The PSI is conducted after the sentencing decision has been made" is not true. In reality, a PSI is conducted before the sentencing decision. The purpose of the PSI is to assist the court in making an appropriate and fair sentencing decision by providing a comprehensive understanding of the offender's background and circumstances. It is an essential step in the sentencing process that helps ensure that the punishment fits the crime and considers the individual's specific circumstances.
To learn more about PSI visit:
brainly.com/question/32062309
#SPJ11
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately __________ percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016.
Answers
Answer:
28 percent
Explanation:
Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.
The term “Big House” originated _____.
Answers
Answer:
because prisons had grown to very large sizes to accommodate more prisoners
Explanation:
Just took the test
On the first day of Richard Skelton's trial for
drug distribution, Ed Pitts approached deputy
Fox in the Fairfax County Courthouse. Ed told
deputy Fox that he would pay Fox $5,000. if Fox would not go into the rest room with Richard, the prisoner, during the first recess called in the
trial. Ed told the deputy that while in the rest room, Richard would climb out the window,
where Richard's girlfriend would be waiting with
a car. Ed would most likely be charged with:
A. corruptly influencing a defendant.
B.attempting to embezzle an officer of the court
C. bribery
D.tampering with an officer.
Answers
Answer:
shakti Jayne Snell is eight Jersey hawk
PLEASE HELP
What is meant by “the rule of law”?
Answers
Source : Wikipedia
I HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU.
Answer:
The rule of law is a durable system of laws, institutions, norms, and community commitment that delivers: Accountability. The government as well as private actors are accountable under the law. Just Law. The law is clear, publicized, and stable and is applied evenly.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest.
source : g o o g l e
which law finally required states to release any relevant information aobut registered sex offenders necessary to maintain and protect public safety
Answers
States are still debating the best way to implement "Megan's Law."
States must implement the registration and notification requirements for sex offenders under this federal law, which was passed in 1996. States are required to make public any pertinent details about registered sex offenders in order to uphold and safeguard public safety.
LEARN MORE ABOUT "Megan's Law." HERE :
https://brainly.com/question/15027727
#SPJ4
You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.
1.What would you do?
Things to consider as you prepare
Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.
One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.
One should do what is best for everyone.
One should do one’s duty.
Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be
Answers
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.
What is an ethical duty?An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Answers
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
What is toxicology?
Toxicology is the study of the negative effects of
blank on living thing
Answers
Answer:
foreign fluids
Explanation:
coroners run a toxicology report when someone passes away to find any kind of drugs, alcohol or poisons in someone's system
Toxicology is the study of foreign fluids and not the study of the negative effects of blank on living things.
What is Toxicology?Toxicology is that branch of science that also helps in the understanding of the same. The most important thing is that Toxicology is that it talks about the harmful effects of the chemicals that are prevalent in society from time immemorial.
Toxicology thus talks about the various means and also the understandings based on the amount of poison that particular thing has got within itself. the other most important thing is that it has also talked about the understanding of the amount of harmfulness of the substance, particularly on some other substances.
Toxicology is thus defined by the amount of toxic or poison that is being generated.
Learn more about Toxicology here:
https://brainly.com/question/5020436
#SPJ2
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answers
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
Karen also doesn't trust judges, so she will demand a jury. Will an appellate court initially hear Karen's case deciding issues such as whether she has a claim and can act as a plaintiff? Yes, but only if Karen can prove that he would have had to wait at least a year for a trial at the trial court level No, but only because Karen did not have a lawyer Yes, so long as a state trial court judge approves and certifies the case for the appellate court without holding a trial first No, because Karen is required to first file the case in the appropriate trial court No, but only because Karen can avoid the requirement to wear a mask by Billy was robbed at gunpoint in a parking lot by a man wearing a mask. As the robber ran off, Billy grabbed his own gun and shot him in the leg. When the police arrived,Billy was arrested along with the thief. When Billy complained about his arrest, the officer in charge told him that because the state police were involved, federal constitutional rights were waived. Billy is trying to obtain legal representation. Which of the following is true regarding Billy's right to counsel? Billy has a right to counsel. Billy has no right to counsel. Billy has a right to counsel, but only if he can establish that he has no previous criminal record. Billy has a right to counsel, but only because felony charges are likely involved.
Answers
No, because Karen is required to first file the case in the appropriate trial court.
In order for an appellate court to hear a case, it must have gone through the trial court level first. Appellate courts do not initially decide issues such as whether a person has a claim and can act as a plaintiff. The trial court is the initial forum where such matters are addressed. Karen would need to file her case in the appropriate trial court and go through the necessary legal proceedings before it could potentially reach the appellate court.
The appellate court's role is primarily to review decisions made by lower courts, rather than initially deciding on the issues presented in a case.
To know more about appellate court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ11
Test strips are most often used for _____.
Answers
Answer: to test the drug content in the blood
Explanation:Option C
How many justices serve on the Supreme Court?
O9
O 10
0 11
O 12
Answers
Answer:
9
Explanation:
There can never be an even number because the decisions would never be made.
Answer:
There are 9 justices that serve on the supreme court.
Explanation:
These 9 justices have been serving their whole life in the Supreme Court. There were 9 justices in Supreme Court since 1869.
Conduct a case study on a location of your choice and identify sources of air or water pollution. Discuss any environmental laws the pollutants or polluters are violating. You will have the option to discuss a relevant factor in your location, such as environmental injustice, epigenetics, or sustainable development. This will be due at the end of Unit 7. Instructions: • Research, find, and describe a case of air or water pollution from a location of your choice from within or outside of the United States. • Discuss the pollutants and how they would be in violation of any current pollution laws or legislation in the area. If here in the United States, how they would be in violation of the Clean Air or Clean Water Acts? Or perhaps the country you have researched has no restrictions on pollution for air and water, discuss how this would further endanger the lives of humans and wildlife in the area. • Choose one (1) of the following special topics below and discuss how the source of pollution is contributing to it. Be sure to support your work with at least two (2) pieces of scientific evidence: o An Environmental Injustice o A threat to Epigenetics by potentially causing inheritable gene defects o Defies sustainable development (contributes to the degraded environment and causes harm to wildlife or the ecosystem) Requirements: • Provide multiple pieces of supporting evidence in your claims, using at least two (2) scholarly resources. • Include all references and citations formatted correctly in APA. • Project should be at least three (3) pages in length, with additional Title and Reference pages. • Use complete sentences and appropriate grammar and spelling.
Answers
One example of a case of air pollution is the city of Delhi in India. Delhi has been experiencing severe air pollution issues for many years, particularly during the winter season.
The main sources of air pollution in Delhi include vehicular emissions, industrial pollution, construction activities, and the burning of agricultural residues.
In terms of legislation, India has implemented various laws and regulations to address air pollution. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 is the primary legislation that empowers the central and state pollution control boards to regulate and control air pollution. The act provides for the prevention, control, and abatement of air pollution through measures such as emission standards, setting up pollution control committees, and conducting regular monitoring.
The pollutants in Delhi's air, such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), would be in violation of the air quality standards set by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in India. These standards aim to protect human health and the environment by defining permissible limits for different pollutants.
If we consider the special topics you mentioned, one aspect related to Delhi's air pollution is environmental injustice. The impact of air pollution is not evenly distributed across the population, with marginalized communities often being disproportionately affected. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and living conditions can exacerbate the health risks associated with air pollution, leading to environmental injustice.
To read more about Air Pollution click here
https://brainly.com/question/31023039
#SPJ11
What is the difference between income and wealth? How do people obtain wealth in the United States?
-Sociology
Answers
type of advance medical directive does the AMA recommend? Living will or Durable power of attorney
I need a definitive answer to this question, please
Answers
Answer:
C) Durable power of attorney
Explanation:
A Power of Attorney is a legal document that appoints an “Agent” to represent you and handle specific issues for you. Depending upon the terms of the Power of Attorney, your Agent could be authorized to make financial and health care decisions on your behalf.
What is the maximum amount of personal funds a broker can place in the property management escrow account
Answers
While committing a bank robbery you fire your weapon at the armed security guard but miss and kill
an unarmed customer instead. Although you did not intend to kill the customer, you may be found
guilty of murder under the doctrine of
intent.
Answers
While committing a bank robbery you fire your weapon at the armed security guard but miss and kill an unarmed customer instead. The 2005 Banco Central burglary in Fortaleza, Brazil, was once recognized by the Guinness Book of World Records as the world's greatest bank robbery.
Carl Gugasian (born October 12, 1947) is an American bank robber, known as "The Friday Night Bank Robber", who served a 17-year sentence for bank robbery. He is perhaps the most prolific of such criminals in US history, having robbed more than 50 banks over a 30-year period for a total of more than $2 million.
A robber who robs a person on the street is often called a mugger. A person who robs a bank is called a bank robber and the act of doing this is called bank robbery.
Learn more about bank robbery here
https://brainly.com/question/15873215
#SPJ9
based on previous supreme court rulings, the form of speech in the image could be limited if it
Answers
The kind of speech in the photograph might be restricted if it takes place at a certain location, time, or in a particular way, according to past Supreme Court decisions.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the top court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution directly calls for. The number of Supreme Court justices is not clearly forth in the Constitution; rather, Congress determines the number. Along with the Chief Justice, the President of India has appointed 30 more judges to the Supreme Court of India. Judges of the Supreme Court begin their retirement at age 65. The supreme court is the highest court in the majority of legal systems. The terms "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal" are also used to refer to these courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/28046758
#SPJ4
Do you know what human rights are
Answers
Answer:
yes and they are inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more
Explanation:
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
For your first DUI conviction, you will have to attend hours of DUI school. A. 3 B. 8 C. 12 D. 16
Answers
Answer:
It's C
Explanation:
12 hours of DUI school you have to attend
For your first DUI conviction, you will have to attend 12 hours of DUI school.
What is DUI?DUI is the act or crime of driving a vehicle while affected by alcohol or drinking. It may lead to arrest or conviction,
For the first device conviction, you will need to attend a minimum of 12 hours of education on drugs and alcohol. This education should be completed within 90 days.
Thus, the right answer is option C.
To learn more about DUI, Refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/988799
#SPJ2
how do you personally define truth and lie
Answers
That’s the difference between truth and lie
Five features of Federalism
Answers
Explanation:
features of federalism are
1 there are two or more level of government
2different tires of government the same citizen but each tier has its own jurisdiction specific matter of Legislature and taxation and administration
3 the level of jurisdiction of the respective level of or two tires of government are specified in the constitution so that existence and authority of each tier of government is constitutionally granted
4 the fundamental provisions of the Constitution cannot be an literally changed by one level of the government such changes required the contest of both level of government
5 sources of revenue for each level of government clearly specialised to ensure its financial authority
I hope it will help you
please mark answer as a brainliest answer
thank you
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
Answers
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
what The case of FTC v. Standard Education was important in the legal transition?
Answers
The case of FTC v. Standard Education was important in the legal transition because it marked the first time that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) successfully challenged false advertising claims made by a for-profit educational institution.
Explanatory answer: In the 1970s, Standard Education Corporation (SEC), a for-profit company that offered vocational training programs, launched a series of aggressive advertising campaigns that made inflated claims about the employment opportunities and earning potential of its graduates. The FTC launched an investigation into the company's practices and ultimately filed a lawsuit against SEC for false advertising. The case went to trial in 1975, and the court found that SEC had indeed made false and misleading statements in its advertising. This marked a significant shift in the legal landscape, as it was the first time that the FTC had successfully challenged false advertising claims made by a for-profit educational institution. The case helped establish the FTC's authority to regulate the advertising practices of for-profit schools and paved the way for further legal action against companies that engage in deceptive marketing. It also underscored the importance of truth in advertising and consumer protection in the education industry.
learn more about FTC at :
https://brainly.com/question/24304308
#SPJ4